How chemists create SUPER-FULLERENE / GRAPHULLERENE | Organic Chemistry Physical Chemistry Materials

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 окт 2024

Комментарии • 36

  • @totalsynthesis
    @totalsynthesis  Год назад +5

    🔔▶ I’ve set up a YT membership option and Patreon for anyone interested in supporting the channel and accessing some perks, including more science insights!
    As you’ve noticed, I’m trying to adhere to a more regular posting schedule - 🪦RIP my christmas break, weekends and free time - so I’m grateful for your support and nice comments.
    www.patreon.com/totalsynthesis
    Thank you!

  • @Find-the-Devil
    @Find-the-Devil Год назад +11

    I mostly talk about graphene and its application in medicine on my youtube channel. Your content is really helpful, and this video is amazing. Thank you for your enormous effort to make these videos. Keep this up🌷🌷.

    • @totalsynthesis
      @totalsynthesis  Год назад +2

      Awesome, will check out

    • @cvspvr
      @cvspvr Год назад

      fuck graphene. it's just a buzzword. i've seen so many papers about how graphene can do things with 10x the efficiency/speed/accuracy/etc., but i've never once seen graphene used in an actual product

  • @helldad4689
    @helldad4689 Год назад +4

    Man we really are never going to run out of carbon allotropes! 2d polycubane sheets when?

  • @FoTeLulz
    @FoTeLulz Год назад +4

    Thanks for the video! This is really cool and seems really useful. I’m working in R&D right now as a chemE and seeing novel materials exhibit properties like this is awesome. Obviously there’s financial incentive to research this as we see all these publications, but it makes me wonder how just how far along the commercialization process are we. Again thanks and really cool vid!

  • @definetlynotacomment1184
    @definetlynotacomment1184 Год назад +2

    This is absolutely insane! C60 in a graphene like structure. This is fascinating.

  • @marcellszmilko4275
    @marcellszmilko4275 Год назад +4

    Wow, I'm early, just watched the kekulene vid and it lead me here. Wow. Good video, kinda no clue what is happening but good video nonetheless.

  • @moosehead4497
    @moosehead4497 Год назад +3

    Yes! More physical organic!

  • @kingfisher1638
    @kingfisher1638 Год назад +3

    Now we need graphullerene nanotubes.

  • @C4pungMaster
    @C4pungMaster Год назад +4

    I would absolutely dig a follow up fullerene chem vid. Doing wacky shit like diels alder, knoevenagel condensation, insertion (sus) of gas and other molecules. There is even dicarbon molecule bridging 2 lanthanum atoms (La2C2) encased in fullerene. Truly cursed stuff

    • @FiglioBastardo
      @FiglioBastardo Год назад

      I know absolutely nothing of which you speak other than agreeing with the fact of a follow up video would be cool! 😁

  • @NabinBhandari-nl9ge
    @NabinBhandari-nl9ge 5 месяцев назад +1

    ❤❤❤ it looks like ball

  • @seanclark6554
    @seanclark6554 Год назад +2

    n-Fullerenes (especially 60) aren't non-natural at all, but super rare on earth. They have been observed in abundance in planetary nebulae, and in red dwarfs. I can send the source if you'd like. Also, you should look into endohedral fullerenes and their synthesis, its a super interesting field.

    • @totalsynthesis
      @totalsynthesis  Год назад +1

      Yea I agree, I actually call out in the video that they are formed geologically so my wording was inaccurate lol :) please share that!

  • @brandonuhlemeyer3470
    @brandonuhlemeyer3470 Год назад +1

    Love it

  • @joseramirezgarcia232
    @joseramirezgarcia232 Год назад +2

    Graphullerene=sheet of fullerene
    Fullegraphullerenene=ball of sheets of graphullerene
    Graphfullegrafphullerenenenene=....

  • @ASlickNamedPimpback
    @ASlickNamedPimpback 10 месяцев назад +1

    So, graphene is a flat sheet of carbon. Fullerene is a folded sheet of graphene into a ball. Graphfullerene is a flat sheet of fullerene. Is there going to be Graphfullerenefullerene? Or Graphfullerene nanotubes?

    • @totalsynthesis
      @totalsynthesis  10 месяцев назад +1

      With enough time these crazy material scientists might get there but not sure if the tubes could be formed (e.g. what size)

  • @philidor9657
    @philidor9657 Год назад +1

    6:05 nooo the first question for me is HOW tf did they characterize such a complex structure and are confident they made such a compound. Is XRD that powerful that it can elucidate such complex and large unit cells and put it together?

    • @totalsynthesis
      @totalsynthesis  Год назад

      Yep. As long as you have a good quality probe, it works well, even for bigger networks

    • @philidor9657
      @philidor9657 Год назад +1

      @@totalsynthesis Man that's so cool.

  • @acompletelyawesomenameyay2587
    @acompletelyawesomenameyay2587 Год назад +2

    Carbon Nano-Onions anyone?

  • @Haplo-san
    @Haplo-san Год назад +1

    What is going on with the subtitles?

    • @totalsynthesis
      @totalsynthesis  Год назад +1

      Whats wrong with them?

    • @Haplo-san
      @Haplo-san Год назад +1

      @@totalsynthesis Didn't you have checked? What you have say in the video is not what is written in the subtitles. It seems subtitles are talking about something called "gibberelin" and it's critical role in plants and mankind.

    • @totalsynthesis
      @totalsynthesis  Год назад +1

      @@Haplo-san Oh dang, for some reason it used my other video's subtitles - fixed it. Thanks!!

  • @chemicalboy2106
    @chemicalboy2106 Год назад +2

    Bisch du ar ETH wül dini stimm chunnt mit bekannt vor

  • @Dr.Im-All-In
    @Dr.Im-All-In Год назад +1

    Same in German pls 😂

  • @sumeriandays86
    @sumeriandays86 Год назад

    It's ironic how ppl always get super excited about new science stuff that can potentially destroy and be incredibly dangerous

    • @Taiyōken-Dai
      @Taiyōken-Dai Год назад

      Is it though? Combustion engine, HCl, impact wrench, all potentially lethal to let untrained people just play around with... used properly, most dangerous things are incredibly useful. Danger is a consideration from usefulness, because if it's not useful you don't need to use it. Novelty is viewed under the lens of functionality, but danger should still factor in if it is useful... not trying to sound like a wisea$$, just trying to make that distinction