Having watched several different electromagnetism lectures I have to say that yours is my favorite one! Thank you for posting these. Your contribution to young minds is awesome.
@@ProfessorCarlson I wish that 272 still recorded videos like this they're so well put together now I wish I had discovered this channel before dead week haha
I laughed every time she asked if there were any questions, and nobody had any. We all know half the room was sitting there without a clue what's happening.
Dear Prof. Carlson - I do like your lectures and I have a question. Why do all lecturers say that permitivity constant is just a constant to get the units right? I have read some Steinmetz, Heaviside as well original Maxwell's memoirs and it does feel that dialectric is a very interesting concept, so permittivity it is different for different materials, it is important for capacitores etc. It was in fact Maxwells new idea that seemed to have been stridently resisted at his time that (according to a serious book by E. T. Whittaker on the subject which is now apparently considered as taboo in physics but written very close to actual sources in 1910 p 284) it was Maxwells core concept that "the dialectric was a seat of a process called - the displacement-current - which is proportional to the rate of increase of the electric force in the dialectric; and that this process producess the same magnetic effects as a true current, and forms, so to speak, a continuation , throught the dielectric, of the charging current, so that the latter may be regarded as flowing in a closed circuit". I have a feeling l it needs to be introduced/ discussed? to quote Steinmetz way back at the end of 19th century; "Unfortunately, to large extent in dealing with dielectric fields the prehistoric conception of the electrostatic charge on the conductor still exists, and by its use destroys the analogy between the two components of the electric field, the magnetic and the dielectric, and makes the consideration of dielectric fields unnecessarily complicated." Perhaps if physicists went back to the SOURCES, they would have been able to better present the ideas conceptually to students and then the students would start asking questions when asked for questions.
@@UKsebstack The sources are often so wrong that the pedagogical necessity makes it important to ignore some of the mistakes they made. Of course, you learn that Einstein thought the universe was static and the consequence of this. But, this is wholly different than the rambling and confused thing you are talking about.
The best professor I've even seen! I have watched so many videos trying to fully understand these equations, meaning that I hoped to combine what I learned from my math classes and physics classes, but it was so hard. Anything takes time to digest. I'm so thankful that you made these slides! They are what I've looking for all the time.
Outstanding tutorial for these four equations. This is Great for a student to get an overview for the nitty gritty. I've never seen a better overview. Perfect Pre-Final for an Electricity&Magnetism class - but doing homework and your ability to solve problems on your own is essential!
Not really, this is too dense and with too few illustrations of the actual physics. Also no mentioning of the history, why did Maxwell go to visit Faraday and what was it he had done. Even the later Lord Kelvin was involved. Heaviside was the one that made Maxwells 20 equations smartly condensed into the four we see. All this is very important not to speak of Einsteins special theory of relativity that is totally based on Maxwells equations, including the E= m c^2 that is easily derived from Maxwells equations. It is much easier to understand Einstein going through Maxwell. Einstein said he did not stand om Sir Isaac's shoulders but on Maxwells.
Thanks for the lecture. I'm preparing for my exam in Theoretical Physics 2 in Germany and your visualisation how to get from the integral form to the derivative form really helped. I am going to have a look on your other lectures as well. It's nice to finally see a female physics prof. Unfortunately there is nearly none diversity at our university among the professors.
Hi Professor Carlson! I dont know if you will get this message but you have been an amazing inspiration for me for the last two years. I have been studying Physics and astrophysics and quantum mechanics everynite for two to three hours. your videos have helped me enormously. Thank you sooo much💕💖💕 David Wallace
@@ProfessorCarlson I cant believe I didn't see this! Astrophysics has changed the way I see the dimension in which we exist. Changed everything for the better! I am not fast enough to be of any use to an organization. But am able to explain Maxwell's equation from start to finish thanks to you. I wish you had a video about Quaternion Mathematics. I posted a video about the similarity between Photons and Electrons using the Aharonoff-Bohm Effect to describe the movement of light waves and Photons in wave packets. I'm using various lenses to describe hypothetical Planetary Electromagnetic fields in the Kepler 90 system. Want a good laugh pop by. Many Blessings for your abilities. David P.S. Hermosa pie is my old moniker👍🏻🙏🏻
Hi Prof Carlson, stumbled onto your lecture series, and I've been loving every video! You have a wonderful ability to move back and forth between the math and the physical intuition behind it, and to bring your students along with you :)
While searching for the explanation of Maxwell's equations, my intuition guided me towards your video, and even before starting the video i was knowing somehow that I would get the concepts. Thanks a lot Mam 🙏.
Hi..I really appreciate your passion of teaching..I mean, I don't have sufficient words..I will try to be better teacher..my students more frequently sleep in class on this topic..Thanks Prof.
Good professor, good notes. BUT, very disturbing transitions between prof and notes... A good alternative is showing notes all the time and having a small rectangle on the corner of the prof.
I agree that videos of speakers with presentations that failing to keep the slide or board in view, the very things to which the speaker is trying to direct your attention, are thoroughly frustrating and greatly diminish the value of the effort. However, one work-around is to view the video in two browser windows, one large, one small. Play the video in the smaller window, and in the larger window have the video paused, and use arrow keys to advance from one view of the slide/board to the next.
It would have been nice when I took calculus 3 to have divergence and curl explained in the context of the EM equations as something with physical relevance, rather than as they were taught (not at Purdue but some other big engineering school) as random things from outer space. Nice lecture!
Your the only reason I'm passing Pushkars class, and for that I am eternally in your debt. Rest easy knowing our physics major discord channel is essentially your biggest fan club.
Absolutely incredible. You have a gift for clear explanation and presenting abstract concepts in an intuitive manner. I like how use analogies such as bubble wand for flux. Thanks for this video!
@@ProfessorCarlson What is the Sun ON BALANCE, AND how is the Sun's CORONA understood (ON BALANCE)? HOW CAN (AND DOES) WHAT IS THE SUN EXIST IN BOTH TIME AND SPACE?: What is the Sun is fully consistent WITH what is E=MC2 in accordance WITH what are SPACE AND TIME. Indeed, what is E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent. What is GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. Indeed, consider what is outer “space” ON BALANCE; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!!! INDEED, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE !!!! GREAT. I have explained the coronal heating ON BALANCE !!!! The Sun's corona is one, TWO, AND three dimensional gravitational/electromagnetic SPACE (ON/IN BALANCE) consistent WITH what is E=MC2 !!!! Therefore, c squared CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE !!!! Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! Therefore, ON BALANCE, a given PLANET (including what is THE EARTH) sweeps out equal area in equal TIME. Accordingly, stellar clustering ALSO proves, ON BALANCE, that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE !!!!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE !!!! c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE !!!! TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!!! I have mathematically (AND CLEARLY) proven and explained what is the fourth dimension ON BALANCE !!!! Perfect. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense ON BALANCE !!!!! INDEED, consider why and how that there is something instead of nothing ON BALANCE !!!!! GREAT. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!!! By Frank Martin DiMeglio The answer is that the corona is one, two, AND three dimensional SPACE ON/IN BALANCE. It is fully consistent WITH what is E=MC2. It is pure ENERGY on balance with what is the Sun. It is a balanced SPACE, without which (again, ON BALANCE) what is the Sun could not exist or be manifest. Great. INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON ON BALANCE !! The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. Great. “Mass”/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE (ON BALANCE); AS GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !!! GREAT. By Frank Martin DiMeglio
I discovered this course during my undergraduate yrs at the engineering school, n even if I know she is married n may be have kids.. still hits me like "Dang, man!! She looks so gorgeous when she talks bout Maxwell equations n does physics" n this makes me get back to watch u..
I’m sad it’s been so long. Glad your elsewhere. Just add in all the talks to my watchlist and I always try commenting on good channels to help the algorithm on the channels end and to help teach RUclips what I like better. 😅❤
Maxwell had calculated the speed of light before Einstein came up with his famous thereom. The man had an innate grasp of the workings of electricity and magnetism with the capability to see the big picture and put it all together with some excellent formula's. James had some pretty amazing insights. Some great teaching with easy to grasp concepts. The maximum speed of light was calculated by Maxwell before Einstein. 😎👍👍
On the subject of Edward Purcell - as she mentioned him - he wrote a beautiful book on electromagnetism. It was one of the Berkeley Physics course books. The best undergrad text for my money. Long out of print though.
Heaviside is to thank. They are heavisides equations, NOT maxwells. Hertz deserves a little credit limit later in the story but maxwell deserves the speed of light relationship, but no more. Excellent description and explanation regardless.
Thank you. Practice exam concept is more interesting. A better way to help students about the subject. Can you please forward those practice questions, that will helpful for me.
Excellent story telling but I learn more if COMPUTER graphics and animations were included to prove her lecture visually to make it stick for a visual learner like me - instead of hearing things and visualizing it myself. I need an Electrical Engineer explain to me how those Formulas really are APPLIED to antennas - I am an Engineering Technician.
“There is no scientific study more vital to man than the study of his own brain. Our entire view of the universe depends on it.” ― Francis Crick The physics of the computer and the projector that are displaying the notes, and the physics of the brain that are moving the hands and conveying the verbal message, are all based on the standard model of physics. both the computer and the brain, can be of very little value to student learning based on the streaming output from each. from preschool teachers to university professors, they know very little about how people learn, selves included, even though they have expertise in their subject area, and can flawlessly stream the content without interruption. however that is the flaw, most educators have not kept up with neuroscience; how our brains work! all educators should start by reading,The Scientist in the Crib, ... followed up by, Scatterbrain... and How People Learn, 2nd ed.
16:21 How many different shape can you Come up with in flat space matching Curved space in current or voltage Dropped of capacitance . Thinking of different uses inside and out So far including optical too . Just thinking !
5:20 What is she talking about? Theoretical science has historically lagged behind experimental science. For instance, the telegraph was invented well before Maxwell's theoretical work. The early telegraph emerged in 1774, followed by many and the Morse system in 1838. Transatlantic cable -> 1854-1858. Maxwell published his early formulations in 1861. I miss the days of the blackboard, chalk, and sponge at the university.
Thanks for your lecture; do you really need to include the Lorentz Force as a fifth equation? I believe that it is already contained in the 4 Maxwell equations. If you write down the momentum conservation law from the Maxwell equations, you get it for free!!!
Not even a reply? You lecture on Maxwell but its Heaviside your students end up with. So! Any chance of ever seeing Maxwells work as he wrote it? 20 questions for 20 unknowns. You teach only what industry wants to be used. You miss SO MUCH out. My last comment was 3 years ago.
Force and motion inertia and acceleration.....magnetic permubility and dielectric permitivity.....field pressures placing dielectric static to charge results in a discharge of energy (electricity).....thats why we can’t have electricity without magnetism....three phase energy core is a spinning magnet (ac)....magnetism = resonance = vibrations = friction = heat = illumination....I’m English but I’m sure we’re on the same page....
this would be a lot better if the focus stayed on the board rather than the professor pointing to the board. If we want to show the professor it should be in a small window that doesn't block the equations on the board.. when she points to the board, we lose the ability to review the eqations.
I know the subject so i could understand, but i think the students wd hv struggled to catch the last part which was bit superficial. Curl could hv been explained better. Also i felt the interpretation of differential form as point relation wasn't given the importance it deserves.
Brilliant question! Need to derive a boundary condition, or solve Gauss' law? Use the integral form. Want to derive the wave equation or find the field throughout all of space? Use the differential form. It pays to be nimble in both forms! Extra bonus points if you teach yourself the beautiful Lorentz Invariant form.
Laws are mnemonic devices, not causes. The cross product turns numbers perpendicular through a math algorithm, so "WHY" electricity and magnetism are perpendicular is a concept that can be completely SKIPPED, and it is not even missed !?!? I had headaches in college from gritting my teeth through these classes. The perpendicular nature of electricity and magnetism is a huge clue to a fundamental truth that gets no attention at all.
Madam, would you be kind enough to guide me to a resource on this: I am looking for an explanation of wire antenna as a receiver. So the question is: a straight thin conductor (not necessarily connected to any circuit) is in a time varying electromagnetic field- what are the charges, current, potential, E and H at different points in the conductor? I want an analysis starting from Faraday's law or Maxwell's laws.
@@rusticagenerica , thanks for reminding. Am still looking for a master's analysis of this topic. Wire as transmitting antenna is easily available. Wire as receiver is rarely explained.
Physics okay....mostly the standard treatment... with not much added insight. But, why talk to students like they're 12 years old? Do you have to take this class, with this prof., to graduate?
Using all the following can have the advantage of non-reproduction and multiplication in matter as well as communication among the general public F=E^2/hc=c^4/G Thank you.
@@ProfessorCarlson it would be a great pleasure and enjoyement for us to know what you do in the department of phyics and astronomy how everything works there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@@PriyaKumari-sf5ti Hi, Priya. For more content, check out my other channel ruclips.net/user/quantumcoffeehouse, and ruclips.net/video/X9hLocsrFwY/видео.html Thanks for asking!
Very disturbing transitions between the notes and the professors. Couldn't even finish the video. Show the notes not the professor!!!! Make transitions less frequent!
Having watched several different electromagnetism lectures I have to say that yours is my favorite one! Thank you for posting these. Your contribution to young minds is awesome.
Thank you for the kind encouragement!
@@ProfessorCarlson I wish that 272 still recorded videos like this they're so well put together now I wish I had discovered this channel before dead week haha
Bro, the way she helps me visualise these things, tells me how well versed and the touch she is with the elegancy of physics, Well done mam.❤️
I laughed every time she asked if there were any questions, and nobody had any. We all know half the room was sitting there without a clue what's happening.
Aw, man! So sorry. This is, alas, the hardest thing about getting live feedback from a roomful of students... getting the questions out on the table.
Hhhhhhhhh...The same thing that is happening to us when we study difficult lessons ...hhhhhhh....no Questions ..
@@ProfessorCarlson The only option is to offer $1 per question asked.
Dear Prof. Carlson - I do like your lectures and I have a question. Why do all lecturers say that permitivity constant is just a constant to get the units right? I have read some Steinmetz, Heaviside as well original Maxwell's memoirs and it does feel that dialectric is a very interesting concept, so permittivity it is different for different materials, it is important for capacitores etc. It was in fact Maxwells new idea that seemed to have been stridently resisted at his time that (according to a serious book by E. T. Whittaker on the subject which is now apparently considered as taboo in physics but written very close to actual sources in 1910 p 284) it was Maxwells core concept that "the dialectric was a seat of a process called - the displacement-current - which is proportional to the rate of increase of the electric force in the dialectric; and that this process producess the same magnetic effects as a true current, and forms, so to speak, a continuation , throught the dielectric, of the charging current, so that the latter may be regarded as flowing in a closed circuit". I have a feeling l it needs to be introduced/ discussed? to quote Steinmetz way back at the end of 19th century; "Unfortunately, to large extent in dealing with dielectric fields the prehistoric conception of the electrostatic charge on the conductor still exists, and by its use destroys the analogy between the two components of the electric field, the magnetic and the dielectric, and makes the consideration of dielectric fields unnecessarily complicated." Perhaps if physicists went back to the SOURCES, they would have been able to better present the ideas conceptually to students and then the students would start asking questions when asked for questions.
@@UKsebstack
The sources are often so wrong that the pedagogical necessity makes it important to ignore some of the mistakes they made. Of course, you learn that Einstein thought the universe was static and the consequence of this. But, this is wholly different than the rambling and confused thing you are talking about.
The best professor I've even seen! I have watched so many videos trying to fully understand these equations, meaning that I hoped to combine what I learned from my math classes and physics classes, but it was so hard. Anything takes time to digest. I'm so thankful that you made these slides! They are what I've looking for all the time.
So glad to hear it! Thanks for the feedback - you made my day! 😄
Outstanding tutorial for these four equations. This is Great for a student to get an overview for the nitty gritty. I've never seen a better overview. Perfect Pre-Final for an Electricity&Magnetism class - but doing homework and your ability to solve problems on your own is essential!
Everything this woman is saying is resonating to a relatable, comprehensive mindset. Bars after bars, knows how to speak on a student level
wow ...you have an amazing power of explaining with every details...thanks for our great lecture
Not really, this is too dense and with too few illustrations of the actual physics. Also no mentioning of the history, why did Maxwell go to visit Faraday and what was it he had done. Even the later Lord Kelvin was involved. Heaviside was the one that made Maxwells 20 equations smartly condensed into the four we see. All this is very important not to speak of Einsteins special theory of relativity that is totally based on Maxwells equations, including the E= m c^2 that is easily derived from Maxwells equations. It is much easier to understand Einstein going through Maxwell. Einstein said he did not stand om Sir Isaac's shoulders but on Maxwells.
It was really interesting looking at a proof of the differential forms without directly stating the Stokes's and Gauss's theorem. Really cool
Thanks for the lecture. I'm preparing for my exam in Theoretical Physics 2 in Germany and your visualisation how to get from the integral form to the derivative form really helped. I am going to have a look on your other lectures as well.
It's nice to finally see a female physics prof. Unfortunately there is nearly none diversity at our university among the professors.
That acting of making students visualize how flowing current produces a time-varying magnetic field was FANTASTIC!
Hi Professor Carlson! I dont know if you will get this message but you have been an amazing inspiration for me for the last two years. I have been studying Physics and astrophysics and quantum mechanics everynite for two to three hours. your videos have helped me enormously. Thank you sooo much💕💖💕 David Wallace
Thanks! You made my day!
@@ProfessorCarlson I cant believe I didn't see this! Astrophysics has changed the way I see the dimension in which we exist. Changed everything for the better! I am not fast enough to be of any use to an organization. But am able to explain Maxwell's equation from start to finish thanks to you. I wish you had a video about Quaternion Mathematics. I posted a video about the similarity between Photons and Electrons using the Aharonoff-Bohm Effect to describe the movement of light waves and Photons in wave packets. I'm using various lenses to describe hypothetical Planetary Electromagnetic fields in the Kepler 90 system. Want a good laugh pop by. Many Blessings for your abilities.
David
P.S. Hermosa pie is my old moniker👍🏻🙏🏻
Hi Prof Carlson, stumbled onto your lecture series, and I've been loving every video! You have a wonderful ability to move back and forth between the math and the physical intuition behind it, and to bring your students along with you :)
Thank you! I'm glad you find the lectures helpful. :-)
While searching for the explanation of Maxwell's equations, my intuition guided me towards your video, and even before starting the video i was knowing somehow that I would get the concepts. Thanks a lot Mam 🙏.
Hi..I really appreciate your passion of teaching..I mean, I don't have sufficient words..I will try to be better teacher..my students more frequently sleep in class on this topic..Thanks Prof.
Thanks for the lecture ❤.
I am preparing for my engineering Electromagnetism exam and this was really helpful .
well done Prof. Carlson, even so far from you here In brazil as a student eletric engineer, i understand you lecture very well. keep doing.
Prof. Carlson. thank you very much about your lecture for Maxwell's equations. You make me understand this important one.
Good professor, good notes. BUT, very disturbing transitions between prof and notes... A good alternative is showing notes all the time and having a small rectangle on the corner of the prof.
Thanks for the idea - maybe next time!
I agree that videos of speakers with presentations that failing to keep the slide or board in view, the very things to which the speaker is trying to direct your attention, are thoroughly frustrating and greatly diminish the value of the effort. However, one work-around is to view the video in two browser windows, one large, one small. Play the video in the smaller window, and in the larger window have the video paused, and use arrow keys to advance from one view of the slide/board to the next.
Not really, you either listen to her or read the notes.
It would have been nice when I took calculus 3 to have divergence and curl explained in the context of the EM equations as something with physical relevance, rather than as they were taught (not at Purdue but some other big engineering school) as random things from outer space. Nice lecture!
I agree. I had the same experience, and with a math professor I could barely understand.
Thanks professor for a beautiful and simply explaining one of the hardest topic.....love from INDIA
Well done.
Your the only reason I'm passing Pushkars class, and for that I am eternally in your debt. Rest easy knowing our physics major discord channel is essentially your biggest fan club.
U r the best Prof that I have seen ...a great thankful from Yemen dear Prof.
you have done more than it need thanks prof.Carlson
Knowledgeable and respectful professor
Greeting from Brazil, that was a great class!
Thank you! 😃
Absolutely incredible. You have a gift for clear explanation and presenting abstract concepts in an intuitive manner. I like how use analogies such as bubble wand for flux. Thanks for this video!
Thanks for the comment! Glad you liked it.
@@ProfessorCarlson What is the Sun ON BALANCE, AND how is the Sun's CORONA understood (ON BALANCE)?
HOW CAN (AND DOES) WHAT IS THE SUN EXIST IN BOTH TIME AND SPACE?:
What is the Sun is fully consistent WITH what is E=MC2 in accordance WITH what are SPACE AND TIME. Indeed, what is E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent. What is GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. Indeed, consider what is outer “space” ON BALANCE; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!!! INDEED, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE !!!! GREAT. I have explained the coronal heating ON BALANCE !!!! The Sun's corona is one, TWO, AND three dimensional gravitational/electromagnetic SPACE (ON/IN BALANCE) consistent WITH what is E=MC2 !!!! Therefore, c squared CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE !!!! Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! Therefore, ON BALANCE, a given PLANET (including what is THE EARTH) sweeps out equal area in equal TIME. Accordingly, stellar clustering ALSO proves, ON BALANCE, that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE !!!!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE !!!! c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE !!!! TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!!! I have mathematically (AND CLEARLY) proven and explained what is the fourth dimension ON BALANCE !!!! Perfect. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense ON BALANCE !!!!! INDEED, consider why and how that there is something instead of nothing ON BALANCE !!!!! GREAT. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!!!
By Frank Martin DiMeglio
The answer is that the corona is one, two, AND three dimensional SPACE ON/IN BALANCE. It is fully consistent WITH what is E=MC2. It is pure ENERGY on balance with what is the Sun. It is a balanced SPACE, without which (again, ON BALANCE) what is the Sun could not exist or be manifest. Great. INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON ON BALANCE !! The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. Great. “Mass”/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE (ON BALANCE); AS GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !!! GREAT.
By Frank Martin DiMeglio
smart way of teaching!
I discovered this course during my undergraduate yrs at the engineering school, n even if I know she is married n may be have kids.. still hits me like "Dang, man!! She looks so gorgeous when she talks bout Maxwell equations n does physics" n this makes me get back to watch u..
Brilliant explanation.
Superb clarity of concepts taught in this video. Thanks for making this video available. ☺️
I'm so glad you find the videos useful!
@@ProfessorCarlson thanks
Thank you very much for sharing this video it was very helpful. You are excellent lecturer ❤️
You are a GREAT instructor. Thank You!
How strange that nobody has any question. Great class though !! Well done professor !!
I’m sad it’s been so long. Glad your elsewhere. Just add in all the talks to my watchlist and I always try commenting on good channels to help the algorithm on the channels end and to help teach RUclips what I like better. 😅❤
Awesome - thank you so much! And so glad you found the new channel 🙂www.youtube.com/@thequantumage
I was there in that classroom. 😁 If I could survive phys172/272 and get a ms in engineering, you could do it too!
🎉🎉🎉😊 first lady to ever make my class thank you
You’re amazing prof carlson 🙏
Thank you!!
Thank you from india
Very clear explaned!
Good evening ! Thank you madam !
Thank you from morocco 😁😊
Maxwell had calculated the speed of light before Einstein came up with his famous thereom.
The man had an innate grasp of the workings of electricity and magnetism with the capability to see the big picture and put it all together with some excellent formula's. James had some pretty amazing insights.
Some great teaching with easy to grasp concepts. The maximum speed of light was calculated by Maxwell before Einstein.
😎👍👍
What famous theorem? Do you mean theory? Which one? Special Relativity?
Many many thanks!
On the subject of Edward Purcell - as she mentioned him - he wrote a beautiful book on electromagnetism. It was one of the Berkeley Physics course books. The best undergrad text for my money. Long out of print though.
Thank you
I love the way tht u teaching
Thanks for the amazing explanation!!!
Thanks for the feedback - I'm glad you find them helpful!
Thanks very much easy to understand
Super beautiful slides.
Thanks prof
Nice
This is great!
nice lecture
5:55 the electrical telegraph predates Maxwell's publication by 20 years....
very good
Heaviside is to thank. They are heavisides equations, NOT maxwells. Hertz deserves a little credit limit later in the story but maxwell deserves the speed of light relationship, but no more. Excellent description and explanation regardless.
Lol. You ignorant fool. Einstein said he stood on the shoulders of Maxwell...and YOU say differently 🤣🤣
Thank you.
Practice exam concept is more interesting. A better way to help students about the subject. Can you please forward those practice questions, that will helpful for me.
Dear professor, where can I get the ppt for this class?
thank you so much🥰😍🤩
Excellent story telling but I learn more if COMPUTER graphics and animations were included to prove her lecture visually to make it stick for a visual learner like me - instead of hearing things and visualizing it myself. I need an Electrical Engineer explain to me how those Formulas really are APPLIED to antennas - I am an Engineering Technician.
Reduced the playback speed to
0.75 c. Now it makes sense 😁😁
Simply beautiful
The eyes of the Lord are on the righteous,
and his ears are attentive to their cry.
Psalm 34:15
I love that verse!
What, no mention of Maxwell's 4th Equation that links gravity with an alternating E field? Oh yeah, they made that one classified...
And how it can be taken into account if permeability and permittivity are depend on coordinates (x,y,z)?
Mostly, you'll need to add extra notation, but all of the concepts will carry over.
“There is no scientific study more vital to man than the study of his own brain. Our entire view of the universe depends on it.”
― Francis Crick
The physics of the computer and the projector that are displaying the notes, and the physics of the brain that are moving the hands and conveying the verbal message, are all based on the standard model of physics.
both the computer and the brain, can be of very little value to student learning based on the streaming output from each.
from preschool teachers to university professors, they know very little about how people learn, selves included, even though they have expertise in their subject area, and can flawlessly stream the content without interruption.
however that is the flaw, most educators have not kept up with neuroscience; how our brains work!
all educators should start by reading,The Scientist in the Crib, ... followed up by, Scatterbrain... and How People Learn, 2nd ed.
16:21 How many different shape can you
Come up with in flat space matching
Curved space in current or voltage
Dropped of capacitance .
Thinking of different uses inside and out
So far including optical too .
Just thinking !
Einstein said he stood on the shoulders of Maxwell....Ich stehe auf den Schultern von Maxwell
5:20 What is she talking about? Theoretical science has historically lagged behind experimental science. For instance, the telegraph was invented well before Maxwell's theoretical work. The early telegraph emerged in 1774, followed by many and the Morse system in 1838. Transatlantic cable -> 1854-1858. Maxwell published his early formulations in 1861. I miss the days of the blackboard, chalk, and sponge at the university.
Thanks for your lecture; do you really need to include the Lorentz Force as a fifth equation? I believe that it is already contained in the 4 Maxwell equations. If you write down the momentum conservation law from the Maxwell equations, you get it for free!!!
Maxwell's Equations corrected.
E=cB=zH=zcD, r=ct
XE=[d/dr,Del][e,E]
XE=[de/dr - Del.E, dE/dr + Del e + DelxE]
0=XE=[de/dr - Del.E, dE/dr + Del e]
0=[dd/dr - Del.D, dB/dt + Del e]
Charge Continuity and Faraday's Law, all from Quaternion Calculus!
THANKS .
Heaviside & Gibbs.
Any chance of Maxwell's Quaternion 20/20??
Not even a reply?
You lecture on Maxwell but its Heaviside your students end up with. So! Any chance of ever seeing Maxwells work as he wrote it? 20 questions for 20 unknowns. You teach only what industry wants to be used. You miss SO MUCH out.
My last comment was 3 years ago.
At 35:40. If B is coming out of the plane, that is in z direction, then how can we take components of B in ''x'' and "y" direction?
Force and motion inertia and acceleration.....magnetic permubility and dielectric permitivity.....field pressures placing dielectric static to charge results in a discharge of energy (electricity).....thats why we can’t have electricity without magnetism....three phase energy core is a spinning magnet (ac)....magnetism = resonance = vibrations = friction = heat = illumination....I’m English but I’m sure we’re on the same page....
Wooow real Quaternion Maxwell equations.
this would be a lot better if the focus stayed on the board rather than the professor pointing to the board. If we want to show the professor it should be in a small window that doesn't block the equations on the board.. when she points to the board, we lose the ability to review the eqations.
isn't "J" at 32:39, the current density of a conductor ? Or if it is not please tell something more about it.
The post mortem lecture!
I know the subject so i could understand, but i think the students wd hv struggled to catch the last part which was bit superficial. Curl could hv been explained better. Also i felt the interpretation of differential form as point relation wasn't given the importance it deserves.
When do we use the differential form of Maxwell's eqn and when to use the integral form?
Brilliant question! Need to derive a boundary condition, or solve Gauss' law? Use the integral form. Want to derive the wave equation or find the field throughout all of space? Use the differential form. It pays to be nimble in both forms! Extra bonus points if you teach yourself the beautiful Lorentz Invariant form.
@@ProfessorCarlson So, using a Lorentz transformation, these equations hold true for any frame of reference? What about time dilatation?
It should be better if screen shows more notes instead of prof self
Laws are mnemonic devices, not causes. The cross product turns numbers perpendicular through a math algorithm, so "WHY" electricity and magnetism are perpendicular is a concept that can be completely SKIPPED, and it is not even missed !?!? I had headaches in college from gritting my teeth through these classes. The perpendicular nature of electricity and magnetism is a huge clue to a fundamental truth that gets no attention at all.
Search on RUclips : Maxwell's fallacy journal.
What hell was that about soap bubble thru the capacitor catching current and not catching current. Does math allow that? This is at 11.48
The soap bubble model does nothing for me.
Area of your square, which part?😁😁
Madam, would you be kind enough to guide me to a resource on this: I am looking for an explanation of wire antenna as a receiver. So the question is: a straight thin conductor (not necessarily connected to any circuit) is in a time varying electromagnetic field- what are the charges, current, potential, E and H at different points in the conductor? I want an analysis starting from Faraday's law or Maxwell's laws.
Still no answer after 1 year ?
@@rusticagenerica , thanks for reminding. Am still looking for a master's analysis of this topic. Wire as transmitting antenna is easily available. Wire as receiver is rarely explained.
Have you stopped uploading?
This series has concluded. However, you can find new content at ruclips.net/user/QuantumCoffeehouse
MM Moop Likey! Good Good Science!
Physics okay....mostly the standard treatment... with not much added insight. But, why talk to students like they're 12 years old? Do you have to take this class, with this prof., to graduate?
They are undergraduates. Not much older.
How does Maxwell’s silver hammer come into it?
this is the way University teaches students now. Not demonstrations not Mathematical Analysis. Just watch and believe in the ecuacion !!!!!
Using all the following can have the advantage of non-reproduction and multiplication in matter as well as communication among the general public F=E^2/hc=c^4/G Thank you.
Where are you now we are waiting for you
Hi, Priya. I am right here. I am always here. :) Are you, by chance, wanting more videos? Just curious! I have a few possibilities in mind.
@@ProfessorCarlson it would be a great pleasure and enjoyement for us to know what you do in the department of phyics and astronomy how everything works there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@@PriyaKumari-sf5ti Thanks for asking! Okay... I'll think about what I could do. Stay tuned... :)
@@PriyaKumari-sf5ti Hi, Priya. For more content, check out my other channel ruclips.net/user/quantumcoffeehouse, and ruclips.net/video/X9hLocsrFwY/видео.html Thanks for asking!
Very disturbing transitions between the notes and the professors. Couldn't even finish the video. Show the notes not the professor!!!! Make transitions less frequent!
This was low budget. I'm working with a real production team on new stuff. :)
曾经想到普渡大学去读博
Sigh…”a curling magnetic flux causes a change in electric flux and a changing electric flux causes a curling magnetic field”….not what she said
Take your practice exam FOR REAL! D:
44.44