Xpro 2 user here, ever since I got into film photography and came into medium format, not only I love the GFX system, the slow experience feels like shooting film camera and found the GFX adapting Vintage Lens is a culture itself now, the community are very supportive, currently I'm rocking with GFX50sii + Minolta Lenses.
Luis, the X-Pro2 was a hell of a camera. Truly the first camera I ever "lusted" after. And yes, the "slow experience" is crapped on by many folks who shoot Sony and ultra-fast cameras. I have an X-H2/s for the faster shooting (and taking photos of my toddler haha). I agree. I have really wanted to get into adapting vintage lenses but just haven't made the leap quite yet. Do you have a place where I can see some of the stuff you've made with the Minolta lenses??
"There is nothing quite like the GFX". 100%. Excellent conversation. Truly! Its funny, after putting out my rather controversial video (XF vs GFX), lot of people hating on the GFX for being crazy expensive, and some people even said the pros dont need it. Well lots of people buy the A7R5… they dont need a 6k body. It's really cool that in 2023, photography is still alive and well. And hobbyists, even beginners are spending tons of $$ on really expensive cameras to enjoy the craft!!!! Beautiful shots at the end Dylan! Really loved this video 👊💪
Yeah, at $3,900 for the A7R5, you're getting a hell of a camera but it's not close to the GFX (in my biased opinion haha). You're right though. I mean, even the Sony lenses (the great ones) are just as pricy as GF glass. Photography is in its golden age, even as AI ramps up and poses another threat to the space. But I saw someone say that what's happening right now with generative AI is a lot like when Photoshop came out - photographers said everything was done for. So, we'll see. For now, I will enjoy my "zoomed in at 200%" moments of "Holy hell look at that quality!" Thanks bro for all the support! I still think your XF vs GFX video is just so great - 56mm vs 110mm is such an interesting comparison, price point aside. So worthwhile.
I’ve been intrigued by the gfx system since the original 50s. What has held me back, barely, is the autofocus and burst speed. For what I do, I need more reliable continuous autofocus for moving subjects (really just one model not moving that fast) and burst rate at about 10fps (not crazy). I know the larger sensor and big glass make this difficult, but maybe it’s time to refresh some of these lenses (110 selfishly for me), as the original ones were made when only contrast detect was available.
I placed an order for the gfx 50r+50mm f3.5 g lens. There seem to be a lot of mixed reviews and opinions around the camera but I’ll try it anyway and sell it if it didn’t suit my style and tastes…
I think you'll quite like it. One of my favorite photographers on Flickr, Branden Frederick, uses that exact kit almost always: www.flickr.com/photos/riobranden/ It's a beast!
I am so so so tempted by this eco-system. I'm rocking Canon gear but would love to jump into Fujifilm too and the images and colours out of the GFX is stunning. Thanks for the review and the gentle nudge towards taking that plunge.
Hugo, this comment definitely made my day - thank you for watching and finding the time to leave this incredibly nice words. I love my GFX and as a bit of a fanboy, I feel inclined to talk about it at large. Let me know if I can help with the decision!
The GFX System is a game changer for sure, I innocently watched Mike Banom’s video where he was shooting cityscapes across the river, he zoomed in to tiny features which then filled the screen with incredible detail! From that moment I was hooked,😂 I jumped in with both feet and then sold everything else to buy lenses, Thanks Mike 😂 @MikeBanom
Hahha! Mike strikes again! He does a hell of a job covering the system in an easy, digestable way. He's a fantastic photographer, to boot. Thanks for the love, Niall! Anywhere I can check out your photos with the GFX? Would love to see what you're shooting!
I had the 50S II very shortly, and while the dynamic range and the sharpness are very good, the overall image (not in 100% view) was very much like the one of a X-T4 or X-T5. Same colors, very similar tonality. As I rarely ever print these days, let alone in poster sizes, I jsut do not need such a camera. An x-T5 with the new 33/1,4 or the new 56/1,2 does an incredible job. Oh, and those Gfx 50 bodies are quite clunky and slow in operation, no comparision with a Fuji X. and so heavy. Opinions differ....
Totally agree - I think the GFX is very 'special' and it, admittedly, is 'hard' to get just right, but when you do, it beats out any other camera on the market. With that said, I use my X-H2 more often with the 33/1.4 and 18/1.4. It's easier to 'get right' and produces amazing results. Not at the same level of the GFX, but in the same universe, for sure.
Amateur here. I do like having good gear. Tools that are competent. Sony FX3 and GM glass for videos that nobody watches. Idk. I'd very much like to get into MF and holster my XE4 for a while. Looking at it from the outside, it seems like GFX (aside from the cost) is the most forgiving and approachable digital MF platform. Apparently 80 percent of users agree.
Yeah, honestly, the stuff you're taking lately and the stuff you're doing in Portugal would benefit so much from a GFX. I was hoping that long train ride was to get a GFX, not the X-T5! hahaa
Agreed - I've played with the X2D and thought it was a unique experience and certainly the files looked different in many ways than the 100S files, but I still think Fujifilm has a strangehold on the DMF market due to their unbeatable price:quality ratio.
How do I change the bit depth on my GFX 50sii I seriously don't get it. I understand what bit depth is but I don't get how to adjust it in the GFX? Great vid Dylan!
Chad, thank you sir! So, the 50S II is a 14-bit RAW output while the 100S and 100 have 16-bit RAW output. If you want to verify the bit depth, you can use the Image menu in Photoshop to verify. Need more help?
Heck yeah man. Love the GFX stuff! Had a show last year where I printed a file 15 feet wide. People were getting as close as possible to pick out stuff in the background. It was dope!
I remember seeing one of your many barn photos and was like damn, I need to shoot more with my GFX haha. Makes the simple photos look that much better, really.
@@oxeneers It does - and it's wild to look at the GFX files next to... anything else. And most people don't even know the TRUE value in GFX, which is in the absolutely incredibly rich files that can take a beating - when most other files would crumble, GFX continues to shine!
@@JerredZ Yes!! You know that feeling well, I'm sure - pulling the highlights or shadow slider down to -100 and seeing the most incredible image underneath. It's like fuckin' magic. Unbelievable results with dynamic range and overall IQ. I don't know how else to say it - there's literally nothing else like it out there. (Hasselblad and Phase One aside haha)
My prediction of the Fuji GFX lined up. I believe Fuji Japan corporation is going to re-map with a super chip that going to in par with any full frame camera.. They going to answer one of the most question that most of us found a negative in that is the lack focus speed by the time Fuji brings out other camera bodies out the GFX 50Rii is going to have a super X5 next Gen with a new sensor that would focus 10 time faster for the same price as the 50sii and will end all Hasselblad and Phase one long domination of the medium format. If Sony Nikon Canon full frame war if not careful they also be in that number. People want high resolution quality with a price they can afford, and Fuji Japan Corp is going to answer that.
Gosh, yeah, that's real detailed. I think you're quite close. The new GFX100 replacement is coming later this month and the integrated grip and new body style will be nice to see but it certainly will be pricey. With the 100S still available, I don't forsee the new GFX100 replacement having mirrorless full-frame or APS-C-level of AF performance. It's still MF after all and the glass needs to physically move (like the 80mm f1.7)... so we'll see. But drive modes and fast continuous shooting is almost here. What a time to be a photographer, huh Jean-Michel?
@@oxeneers yes it’s a great time. In 2012 I was living in Ireland 🇮🇪 doing photography and went to a camera shop that sold exclusively Hasselblad systems and I held for the first time a 60megapixel MF and the cost was 60K at the time and that was my experience with it for 30mins (way out of my price range) house note. How ever I was able to purchase the Fuji. x-Pro1 was a few lines. 2018 I purchased my first mirrorless camera Sony a7iii with an 24-70mm f2.8GM and the 85mm f1.4GM and had a bargain 90mm micro f2.8 I still have it-it’s my go to camera. But I been thinking about that Hasselblad and they did make an X1D mirrorless one but it did hit-it still look expensive. But behold the gods had answered my wishes. Fuji GFX 50sii for $4,000 or less. Now my true wish for the last 35 years has been fulfilled.. Exciting is that even the word. I can shoot any camera that anyone puts in front of me that’s because I know the mechanical fundamental of taking pictures. So in close I am once again a Fuji brother this time it’s personal..lol. I’m a studio portrait, photographer, and the GFX 50sii is what I need. I also like landscape photography and architecture more of the fine Arts black and white.
Interesting overview - as a hobbyist myself I confirm your thoughts about amateurs owning GFX system. I am curious why did you decide to go with the 63 considering you already have the 50 f 3.5 - I am myself an owner of the 63 and I am considering replacing it with the 50 due the more compact size for travel. This is currently my only lens due to economic reasons - I am looking at the 80 or 110 for my second lens at some point.
Thanks for watching, Dimitar! I think I initially got the 50mm for walkaround reasons but once I realized that the camera wasn't nearly as big as I had thought, I wanted something with more 'oomph' than what the 50mm could provide. I have taken some of my favorite, "Woah is that for real?" photos on the 50mm but the 63mm is a more familiar focal length to me and I do benefit from the extra DOF with the f2.8 vs f3.5. However, the 50mm is unreal for what it is. I think it's a must have for any GFX owner, while the 63mm is a luxury purchase that is fun as hell. I do think the 110 and 80 are great choices. If you are annoyed with slower focusing, glass 'racking' lenses, the 80mm won't be a great choice because the 110mm has the LM in it. But it's much bigger and heavier. Decisions, decisions...
@@oxeneers Thanks for your feedback! I think the 63 is a bit underrated lens in the community. It is much faster than expected and I was hoping the 80 will be similar in experience. I tested the 80 for a few days and I agree it is noticeably slower than the 63. Considering the 80 is not a small lens itself I deem it is worth the extra size and money to go for the 110. One question - do you feel the 50 is significantly more compact than the 63 or the difference is negligible?
I need to get my GFX out to some snowy conditions like you experienced over the winter and play with the highlight recovery haha. Thanks man! Nothing else like it.
Hahah! You wouldn't believe it, but getting a GFX was a months-long back and forth of "Do I need it? Do I want it? What does it mean?" I'm glad I got it but it for sure is not a "must have" unless you're doing paid work, you know? But, if you can stomach the extra funds (especially in this environment), it is such a pleasure to use and shoot with. I am an incredibly happy customer.
Yes, it is a "bigger" sensor and will gather more light. Hassy is great - no doubt about it. But the price for the body + decent glass puts it in another category.
@@Rocky_KO Been a long day of Fujifilm discussion lol. Good catch! Yes, same sensor. ZP did a great video on the 63 comparison - ruclips.net/video/TN5ONdK7Uz4/видео.html I think the GFX outperforms the X2D easily.
Gilles, the Hasselblad and Phase One bodies and lenses are quite challenging to get a hold of, cost-wise. I have reviewed photos and videos online and have come to my conclusion, as have many others. Thanks for watching.
Hey man appreciate the feedback. I actually discuss much more than a press release in this video. In fact, there is no press release mentioned at all but instead an interview. Not sure where you are getting "press release" from. I mainly discuss my GFX journey and my own opinion (backed up with photos that I personally took) in the video. Again, appreciate the feedback. I'm always trying to grow and learn here.
Appreciate the feedback! I'd say that these are not your 'typical' jump cuts, as they are more just cuts to remove dead air or 'uhh' and 'ahh' filler words. I doubt you'd like to hear those, haha.
Also people, what are you waiting for? Subscribe now!!!
Need to give you a raise these days, Mike. Thank you sir!!!
Xpro 2 user here, ever since I got into film photography and came into medium format, not only I love the GFX system, the slow experience feels like shooting film camera and found the GFX adapting Vintage Lens is a culture itself now, the community are very supportive, currently I'm rocking with GFX50sii + Minolta Lenses.
Luis, the X-Pro2 was a hell of a camera. Truly the first camera I ever "lusted" after. And yes, the "slow experience" is crapped on by many folks who shoot Sony and ultra-fast cameras. I have an X-H2/s for the faster shooting (and taking photos of my toddler haha). I agree. I have really wanted to get into adapting vintage lenses but just haven't made the leap quite yet.
Do you have a place where I can see some of the stuff you've made with the Minolta lenses??
@@oxeneers I’ll hit you up on IG send you a few pics
My 100s is my favorite camera for 50” x 70” prints but my 50r is just magnificent.
Agreed! Although I printed a 40x30 shot from my 50S II and it came out unbelievably well. Thanks for watching Jorge!
"There is nothing quite like the GFX". 100%. Excellent conversation. Truly!
Its funny, after putting out my rather controversial video (XF vs GFX), lot of people hating on the GFX for being crazy expensive, and some people even said the pros dont need it. Well lots of people buy the A7R5… they dont need a 6k body.
It's really cool that in 2023, photography is still alive and well. And hobbyists, even beginners are spending tons of $$ on really expensive cameras to enjoy the craft!!!!
Beautiful shots at the end Dylan! Really loved this video 👊💪
Yeah, at $3,900 for the A7R5, you're getting a hell of a camera but it's not close to the GFX (in my biased opinion haha). You're right though. I mean, even the Sony lenses (the great ones) are just as pricy as GF glass.
Photography is in its golden age, even as AI ramps up and poses another threat to the space. But I saw someone say that what's happening right now with generative AI is a lot like when Photoshop came out - photographers said everything was done for. So, we'll see. For now, I will enjoy my "zoomed in at 200%" moments of "Holy hell look at that quality!"
Thanks bro for all the support! I still think your XF vs GFX video is just so great - 56mm vs 110mm is such an interesting comparison, price point aside. So worthwhile.
I’ve been intrigued by the gfx system since the original 50s. What has held me back, barely, is the autofocus and burst speed. For what I do, I need more reliable continuous autofocus for moving subjects (really just one model not moving that fast) and burst rate at about 10fps (not crazy). I know the larger sensor and big glass make this difficult, but maybe it’s time to refresh some of these lenses (110 selfishly for me), as the original ones were made when only contrast detect was available.
Excellent video. I love my 50sii with the 63mm & 110mm. You got yourself a New Subscriber :)
Man thank you! Really really appreciate that. Where can I see some of the photos you're taking with those lenses?
I placed an order for the gfx 50r+50mm f3.5 g lens.
There seem to be a lot of mixed reviews and opinions around the camera but I’ll try it anyway and sell it if it didn’t suit my style and tastes…
I think you'll quite like it. One of my favorite photographers on Flickr, Branden Frederick, uses that exact kit almost always:
www.flickr.com/photos/riobranden/
It's a beast!
Thank you for sharing the link.
It looks interesting and I can’t wait receive the product.
Really in-depth summary here, great job!!!
Thank you Sarynelli ❤️
I am so so so tempted by this eco-system. I'm rocking Canon gear but would love to jump into Fujifilm too and the images and colours out of the GFX is stunning. Thanks for the review and the gentle nudge towards taking that plunge.
It's wild man - I shoot with my other cameras (APS-C etc) and I always come back to the GFX and get blown away constantly. Unbelievable.
This was fun, Dylan! I have thinking about this system for a while and this type of content is quite helpful!
Hugo, this comment definitely made my day - thank you for watching and finding the time to leave this incredibly nice words. I love my GFX and as a bit of a fanboy, I feel inclined to talk about it at large. Let me know if I can help with the decision!
50Sii and the 50mm 3.5… my “big” X100 😅 To me… it’s like “the IMAX” of consumer photography.
Hahha yes! It's a hell of a combo.
The GFX System is a game changer for sure, I innocently watched Mike Banom’s video where he was shooting cityscapes across the river, he zoomed in to tiny features which then filled the screen with incredible detail!
From that moment I was hooked,😂
I jumped in with both feet and then sold everything else to buy lenses,
Thanks Mike 😂
@MikeBanom
Hahha! Mike strikes again! He does a hell of a job covering the system in an easy, digestable way. He's a fantastic photographer, to boot. Thanks for the love, Niall! Anywhere I can check out your photos with the GFX? Would love to see what you're shooting!
Used GFX50R for $2600 or...a brand NEW GFX50Sii for $2900...?! Think I know what to do lol.
The IBIS on the 50S II is great but if you prefer the rangefinder aesthetic, it's an easy choice. Also, I prefer the screen on the 50S.
I had the 50S II very shortly, and while the dynamic range and the sharpness are very good, the overall image (not in 100% view) was very much like the one of a X-T4 or X-T5. Same colors, very similar tonality. As I rarely ever print these days, let alone in poster sizes, I jsut do not need such a camera. An x-T5 with the new 33/1,4 or the new 56/1,2 does an incredible job. Oh, and those Gfx 50 bodies are quite clunky and slow in operation, no comparision with a Fuji X. and so heavy. Opinions differ....
Totally agree - I think the GFX is very 'special' and it, admittedly, is 'hard' to get just right, but when you do, it beats out any other camera on the market.
With that said, I use my X-H2 more often with the 33/1.4 and 18/1.4. It's easier to 'get right' and produces amazing results. Not at the same level of the GFX, but in the same universe, for sure.
Amateur here. I do like having good gear. Tools that are competent. Sony FX3 and GM glass for videos that nobody watches. Idk. I'd very much like to get into MF and holster my XE4 for a while. Looking at it from the outside, it seems like GFX (aside from the cost) is the most forgiving and approachable digital MF platform. Apparently 80 percent of users agree.
One day I will reunite with my gfx 😂❤
DO IT NOW
Yeah, honestly, the stuff you're taking lately and the stuff you're doing in Portugal would benefit so much from a GFX. I was hoping that long train ride was to get a GFX, not the X-T5! hahaa
What he said!
My 100 produces really nice images by using ultra sharp industrial lenses for micro and close-up photo shootings.
Yes, totally - the 100 can output some insanely detailed images with the right glass and conditions. As I said, nothing comes close to GFX.
I have both the Hassy X2D and the Fujifilm GFX100S both very good but way different character.
Agreed - I've played with the X2D and thought it was a unique experience and certainly the files looked different in many ways than the 100S files, but I still think Fujifilm has a strangehold on the DMF market due to their unbeatable price:quality ratio.
How do I change the bit depth on my GFX 50sii I seriously don't get it. I understand what bit depth is but I don't get how to adjust it in the GFX? Great vid Dylan!
Chad, thank you sir! So, the 50S II is a 14-bit RAW output while the 100S and 100 have 16-bit RAW output. If you want to verify the bit depth, you can use the Image menu in Photoshop to verify. Need more help?
Heck yeah man. Love the GFX stuff! Had a show last year where I printed a file 15 feet wide. People were getting as close as possible to pick out stuff in the background. It was dope!
I remember seeing one of your many barn photos and was like damn, I need to shoot more with my GFX haha. Makes the simple photos look that much better, really.
@@oxeneers It does - and it's wild to look at the GFX files next to... anything else. And most people don't even know the TRUE value in GFX, which is in the absolutely incredibly rich files that can take a beating - when most other files would crumble, GFX continues to shine!
@@JerredZ Yes!! You know that feeling well, I'm sure - pulling the highlights or shadow slider down to -100 and seeing the most incredible image underneath. It's like fuckin' magic. Unbelievable results with dynamic range and overall IQ. I don't know how else to say it - there's literally nothing else like it out there. (Hasselblad and Phase One aside haha)
My prediction of the Fuji GFX lined up. I believe Fuji Japan corporation is going to re-map with a super chip that going to in par with any full frame camera.. They going to answer one of the most question that most of us found a negative in that is the lack focus speed by the time Fuji brings out other camera bodies out the GFX 50Rii is going to have a super X5 next Gen with a new sensor that would focus 10 time faster for the same price as the 50sii and will end all Hasselblad and Phase one long domination of the medium format.
If Sony Nikon Canon full frame war if not careful they also be in that number. People want high resolution quality with a price they can afford, and Fuji Japan Corp is going to answer that.
Gosh, yeah, that's real detailed. I think you're quite close. The new GFX100 replacement is coming later this month and the integrated grip and new body style will be nice to see but it certainly will be pricey. With the 100S still available, I don't forsee the new GFX100 replacement having mirrorless full-frame or APS-C-level of AF performance. It's still MF after all and the glass needs to physically move (like the 80mm f1.7)... so we'll see. But drive modes and fast continuous shooting is almost here.
What a time to be a photographer, huh Jean-Michel?
@@oxeneers yes it’s a great time.
In 2012 I was living in Ireland 🇮🇪 doing photography and went to a camera shop that sold exclusively Hasselblad systems and I held for the first time a 60megapixel MF and the cost was 60K at the time and that was my experience with it for 30mins (way out of my price range) house note. How ever I was able to purchase the Fuji. x-Pro1 was a few lines.
2018 I purchased my first mirrorless camera Sony a7iii with an 24-70mm f2.8GM and the 85mm f1.4GM and had a bargain 90mm micro f2.8 I still have it-it’s my go to camera.
But I been thinking about that Hasselblad and they did make an X1D mirrorless one but it did hit-it still look expensive. But behold the gods had answered my wishes.
Fuji GFX 50sii for $4,000 or less.
Now my true wish for the last 35 years has been fulfilled.. Exciting is that even the word.
I can shoot any camera that anyone puts in front of me that’s because I know the mechanical fundamental of taking pictures.
So in close I am once again a Fuji brother this time it’s personal..lol.
I’m a studio portrait, photographer, and the GFX 50sii is what I need.
I also like landscape photography and architecture more of the fine Arts black and white.
Interesting overview - as a hobbyist myself I confirm your thoughts about amateurs owning GFX system. I am curious why did you decide to go with the 63 considering you already have the 50 f 3.5 - I am myself an owner of the 63 and I am considering replacing it with the 50 due the more compact size for travel. This is currently my only lens due to economic reasons - I am looking at the 80 or 110 for my second lens at some point.
Thanks for watching, Dimitar! I think I initially got the 50mm for walkaround reasons but once I realized that the camera wasn't nearly as big as I had thought, I wanted something with more 'oomph' than what the 50mm could provide. I have taken some of my favorite, "Woah is that for real?" photos on the 50mm but the 63mm is a more familiar focal length to me and I do benefit from the extra DOF with the f2.8 vs f3.5. However, the 50mm is unreal for what it is. I think it's a must have for any GFX owner, while the 63mm is a luxury purchase that is fun as hell.
I do think the 110 and 80 are great choices. If you are annoyed with slower focusing, glass 'racking' lenses, the 80mm won't be a great choice because the 110mm has the LM in it. But it's much bigger and heavier. Decisions, decisions...
@@oxeneers Thanks for your feedback! I think the 63 is a bit underrated lens in the community. It is much faster than expected and I was hoping the 80 will be similar in experience. I tested the 80 for a few days and I agree it is noticeably slower than the 63. Considering the 80 is not a small lens itself I deem it is worth the extra size and money to go for the 110. One question - do you feel the 50 is significantly more compact than the 63 or the difference is negligible?
GFX is all Fuji. A few compromises in speed or whatever….but the image quality makes all the null IMO. Love my GFX! Great vid Dylan 👍
I need to get my GFX out to some snowy conditions like you experienced over the winter and play with the highlight recovery haha. Thanks man! Nothing else like it.
@@oxeneers I just pulled in some highlights from a waterfall in the full sun recently that blew me away.
i wish i hadn t seen this video. i feel that i already have money set asside to buy it now. :))
Hahah! You wouldn't believe it, but getting a GFX was a months-long back and forth of "Do I need it? Do I want it? What does it mean?" I'm glad I got it but it for sure is not a "must have" unless you're doing paid work, you know? But, if you can stomach the extra funds (especially in this environment), it is such a pleasure to use and shoot with. I am an incredibly happy customer.
Shot both gfx 100s and hasselblad x2d and hassy has better final image quality
Yes, it is a "bigger" sensor and will gather more light. Hassy is great - no doubt about it. But the price for the body + decent glass puts it in another category.
They both have the same sensor.
@@Rocky_KO Been a long day of Fujifilm discussion lol. Good catch! Yes, same sensor.
ZP did a great video on the 63 comparison - ruclips.net/video/TN5ONdK7Uz4/видео.html
I think the GFX outperforms the X2D easily.
@@Rocky_KO yes but it's hasselblads colour science that steals the show
@@oxeneers same sensor its hasselblads colour science that prevails 👍🏻
Take advantage of me papi
The 50 mm is not a pancake lens.
Hi Gilles, the GF50mm f3.5 has long been referred to as a pancake lens within the GFX system. Thanks for the feedback.
It’s as pancake as it’s gonna be on GFX for now.
What about Hasselblad and Phase One ? You never test them ?😂
Gilles, the Hasselblad and Phase One bodies and lenses are quite challenging to get a hold of, cost-wise. I have reviewed photos and videos online and have come to my conclusion, as have many others. Thanks for watching.
If you’re not making money from photography, those systems are a lot more money than a 50Sii/50mm.
I do photographe for the pleasure and. passion,@@MikeLikesChannel
You made a whole video for reading off press releases. I think I'd prefer just reading the press releases myself
Hey man appreciate the feedback. I actually discuss much more than a press release in this video. In fact, there is no press release mentioned at all but instead an interview. Not sure where you are getting "press release" from.
I mainly discuss my GFX journey and my own opinion (backed up with photos that I personally took) in the video. Again, appreciate the feedback. I'm always trying to grow and learn here.
Dial back the jump cuts and I’ll sub in a heartbeat
Appreciate the feedback!
I'd say that these are not your 'typical' jump cuts, as they are more just cuts to remove dead air or 'uhh' and 'ahh' filler words. I doubt you'd like to hear those, haha.