I love the idea of a group of researchers stumbling across a T-rex, but instead of rushing at them and trying to eat them it just kinda lazily looks at them and goes back to sleep. Or maybe a sauropod twisting in all sorts of weird ways trying to scratch an itch, like you see animals do today
If anything, it's herbivores you should be afraid of. Carnivores will not waste their energy and risk injury on a meal that's more trouble than it's worth. Herbivores will utterly pulp anything that enters their territory that can vaguely even be seen as a threat.
Its probably a bit dated now since the cgi was the main selling point at the time, but the documentary "Walking with Dinosaurs" made an effort to try to depict dinos more like you would see animals in a nature film than monsters from a hollywood movie. The brand went on to do live shows with animatronics and puppets but the documentary was around a long time before that. It might be nostalgia, but I loved those docos when I saw them on TV.
@@lekhaclam87 The worst example of the opposite of this in movies in Jurassic Park III when the team stumbles across a t-rex feeding off a several ton corpse, and for absolutely no reason what so ever the t-rex abandons the extremely large food source to chase a small group of human's who would be like a single bite to it. Like have you ever seen wolves just abandon a deer carcass to chase crows for hours?
*that one scene in Jurassic Park where the kids are in the car. The T.Rex sees them, the kids brace for its roar... and it just kinda itches its side like a bird and walks away.*
As a kid a had a book about dinosaurs and was obsessed with all these monstrous creatures, but now I'm kinda sad because we won't be able to see them and know for sure about them, only speculate...
Like, ok giant reptiles are cool and stuff, but things we know and see about today's animals is much more cool and fact that we won't see documentary about sleeping trex on natgeo is sad
i really find those animals more interesting now...as a kid i used to think they just fought like most kids but now that i grew up i find it so boring...just fighting? animals do so many more stuff and recently there were some marks on bones that maybe suggested young tyrannosaurus playing with those bones which makes sense if they were to practice their bone crushing bites from young age and animals do practice capabilities by playing today it gives a such peaceful vibe you know...that is my opinion
It did inspire a new wave of paleo art painting prehistoric animals looking and behaving more as animals than movie monsters, even got a sequel with “all your yesterdays” where artists submitted their own artwork on the subject.
Looking at a Utahraptor display, declaring it likely one of the most vicious predators ever, my sister suggested it might have been as chill as modern cheetahs
Or even like lions, which -are- vicious if you're a prey or another predator that might be competition (hyena, for example), but also pretty lazy most of the time, and definitely don't just roam around slaughtering at will. It's why there's old stories of cape buffalo being one of the most dangerous animals in Africa, not the lion or leopard or anything. Hippos, too, rank -way- up there. It makes you wonder just how dangerous the herbivore dinosaurs -actually were- compared to the predators. I bet some of them were really quite aggressive, just like we see in some modern day large herbivores.
@@TenereAMir That was another conversation my sister and I had at the same dinosaur exhibit. She works with large herbivores and is fully aware of their dangers. We also talked about dinosaurs being pink from a strict shrimp diet, like flamingos
You know what annoys me? When dinosaur shows depict the predatory dinosaur utter a roar as it pounces to catch its prey. Yeah like they'd really do that and alert the prey to their presence.
the most known dinosaurs are really strange...nothing like what a real dinosaur would look like...they look more like a dragon or some creature that only thinks of killing
I'll be honest: until now I never realised how "normal" dinosaurs could look like, yet on the other side, remembering the hippopotamus skull interpretation gave me the creeps a few years ago. Who would interpret such a chubby creature with a demonic shape? ...Well exactly the same point is here made. We do not know how dionsaurs really looked like. And by knowing the modern nature it is very likely they looked somekind of similar, because back then they inherit the niches modern animals ocupy now. Dinosaurs had millions of years to adapt. They are nor likely to be just simple reptiloids. It makes you think how normal those creatures really looked like for the modern human...
uhh, actual hippos are only cute from say, 1 km away, vertically but also in terms of distance between you and it. they will eat anything that fits in their maws and can flip an 4x4 humvee like a sixth grader flipping a half empty bottle
I guess I'm weird, since I've long adored adorable paleoart. There's just something about seeing a critter typically shown as ferocious doing something cute or just as simple as sleeping that puts a smile on my face. It's also a nice change from the usual, not even exclusively from a scientific perspective. Sometimes it's nice to mix it up a bit.
One of my favourites is the image of a t-rex just resting in a forest, and with lips (ie. teeth hidden), it just looks huge and strong without the unrealistic campiness of constantly roaring.
Same, my favorite animals are birds so i just enjoy avian dinousaurs more They look cute and i would like to pet one, but irl birds can also be hunters and violent (just look at cassowaries)
I've seen an art piece depicting velociraptors with modern pet bird patterns, doing modern pet bird things. I think one was designed to look like a cockatiel
I am bound to propose a game where I give people pictures of skeletons of a Rooster, an Owl, a Turkey, An Ostrich and a peacock to show people how it is impossible to distinguish those animals from their skeletons even though they are so different. I think it makes pretty clear how dinossaurs were probably much more diverse than we think
Well, I mean, the ostrich would be easy to tell apart in comparison to the other, listed birds. It's just the biggest. But as for the rest, that would certainly interesting to see and would maybe get those people who are stuck on the whole "dinosaur = movie monster" concept a push in the right direction
I think you should know that the scientists who try to reconstruct what dinosaurs might have looked like don't just take a look at the skeletons and let their imagination do the rest.
I really like the idea of dinosaurs finally being shown as animals not just props or a myth lmao and I also never liked the idea that all dinos looked similar, just hide or scales with sometimes feathers. Holy crap 3.5k likes? thanks yall lol
Sort of the problem is that the skeleton can only tell us so much, and soft tissue like skin rarely fossilises. Lions and tigers are regarded as different animals even by toddlers due to their different colours and behaviours, but we’d never know for sure if we only knew from fossils, since their skeletons are so similar. The book also features a segment called “All todays” which satirises the trends of depicting dinosaurs as skin wrapped monsters, applying behaviours to them with little to no evidence or basing reconstructions of animals on distant relatives due to incomplete fossils (as seen with Spinosaurus and Deinocheirus, which turned out to be marginally different from their cousins) by applying all of these artistic tropes to modern animals, such as elephants as emaciated trunkless monsters, humming birds as blood sucking parasites, and snakes having legs and feathers.
How similar different species of animal look tends to vary. You would expect the Asian and African elephants to belong to the same genus but they actually don't. Meanwhile, lions and leopards belong to the same genus despite how different they look.
Wanted to add that invertibrates like to play, too! I keep aquatic snails, and they do plenty of things to entertain themselves when they're not eating. One species in particular loves to climb to the top of the tank and release themselves, floating down and having a blast.
I would love to see a movie like Jurassic park with this kind of Dinosaurs with a more attractive and creative designs and fascinating behaviors almost like magic.
Jurassic World kinda has moments like that, from Blu (or Blue) a raptor playing with Owen, to some dinosaurs having actual emotions instead of "im gonna kill you" Same with the Raptors in JP3 where they protect their eggs.
Don’t snap your fingers or else the dinosaurs’ll be turned into bricks and paper, the cats’ll be basically the same but do this real weird mating dance, and mankind- well their future might actually be a bit brighter but still
I have always found it frustrating that people close themselves off to the possibilities of what long dead creatures may have looked or behaved like. Always drawn with no fur or feathers, all muddy greens and browns. But that's not what animals look like! How could you know a chameleon can change it's colors just looking at it's bones? How would you know that a peacock has such large impractical feathers? Or that male lions have beautiful manes? Could you tell how friendly a dog is, just by looking at it's sharp teeth? How would you know that glass frogs have clear skin? You wouldn't. So why assume when you can wonder?
I tend to agree with your overall comment but I don’t think the dog is a good exemple, since it’s a human creation obtained trough selective breeding, its behaviour is by no mean something natural.
Tbf I also think you could figure out peacocks have some sort of extensive tail ornamentation like that, using something similar to the method used to determine the pores on dinosaur bones correspond to feather quills.
I think this is part of what makes monster hunter's ecology so fun and interesting. Even in a game explicitly about fighting these incredibly powerful beasts with magical elemental abilities and whatnot. They still take the time to animate things like how Diablos eats cactus because it's actually a herbivore despite its fearsome appearance. Or how Barroth rolls around in the mud and looks adorable doing it.
Actually really aggressive herbivores aren't too off the mark! Most big carnivores wouldn't bother with anything that's more trouble than they're worth, but herbivores? They just wanna wreck stuff. Think territorial hippos or bull elephants on musth.
The antelope which are a Tiger's primary prey are colour-blind & so find it difficult to discern between red & green pigments (possibly Deuteranopia), explaining the Tiger's apparently bizarre bright orange & white (with black stripes) fur colourings given it's environment filled with myriad hues of green. So, once you eliminate colour & compare the tonal values of their coat with that of the surrounding foliage of semi-tropical/tropical plants, a Tiger will vanish into the background in an astonishing exemplar combining both concealing & disruptive camoflage. Try to imaging all the parallel Predator/Prey Dynamics in Dinosaurs & you start to grasp just how challenging being a Paleoartist truly is. Typically the best that they can do is follow the science, with limited artistic license based on our understanding of modern animals.
Short of finding an entire preserved eye of a prey species that would tell us what colors they could see, it wouldn't be possible to entirely rule out that same sort of 'obvious' (to us) coloration on some predatory species!
I own Many Types of birds and every single time I see a Group of Ducklings, I can't help but imagine them as Little Baronyxs Roaming a river, Everything from the Posture, to the walk to the fighting seems like something a Baronyx would do, Same with with turkeys and the Spinosaur, Or a Rooster and a Velociraptor
It's great to see the "shrinkwrapping of skeletons" slowly change into something more realistic with muscles, fat, feathers and a social life like modern animals.
@@inactivated101 I think you should study a bit more how science works. Just because we can't directly experience the results of science with our own bodies and senses, does not invalidate experiements done with instruments and methods of science. The point of science is to create reproducable results. Scientific speculation, such as in this book, is there to fill in the gaps of knowledge we do not yet have access to with current data and methodology. Dinosaurs in particular have gone from slow, lumbering lizards to more active and agile avian-like creatures with the progression in paleontology. This transformation in appearance, would not be possible without science. Speculation then become the realm of both frontier and fantasy as scientists and artists can chalk up ideas that could later become testable as new specimens are found or new methodology become available to research those specimens.
I don’t know why but this almost made me cry. Just such beautiful creatures that I shall never know. But for millions of years these creatures lived lives which must have been wondrous. Science is truly amazing
After watching this, some cryptid videos, some speculative zoology videos, the video about inaccurate medieval animal art, the video about strange medieval monsters, and video about codex seraphinianus, makes me want to make an encyclopedia about alien creatures and monsters.
I’m sure gonna make an encyclopedia in the future! I have a project called “Mission: Neovita” where people are forced to leave Earth due to the extreme weather conditions and war. They colonize Mars and then they find a habitable planet in a nearby system and call it Neovita as for “New life”. The planet seams like a paradise, but they end up discovering a race of intelligent aliens living there and so much more.
To be honest, I just searched the skeleton of a rooster and I can totally see how I would imagine a Jurassic Park looking Dinossaur looking at just the skeleton, rather then imagining the top of the head (comb) , the big chest, the feathered tail... There is really much we don't know and have to speculate
I thought the part on the Laellynasarus to be interesting because the artists were conflicted on portraying them as cute. This is something I noticed in a lot of speculative biology works, on how sometimes it feels like the artists are obligated to make creatures as "uncute" and "unpretty" as possible. You can make a point that evolution doesn't need to conform to human's beauty standards (like, a birrin could think human are ugly as frick: "haha, they have only two eyes and no wings, what a bunch of fugly losers, my grandma is prettier than them"), but that doesn't stop animals in real world from being colorful and, as the meme says, "shaped like a friend". So I think speculative biology should consider this when making new creatures, obviously when it might work.
This channel is so detailed and is helping me with my speculative evolution project thank you :) ps: plz do part 2 of after man, have other interesting spieces.
You know how sometimes birds fly into windows? I'm just saying it's a good thing there were no glass windows in the Mesozoic! "Honey!" "Yes dear" "Guess what!" "What?" "The stego' ran into the window." "AGAIN?!" (sigh) "Again." "I swear they're more trouble than they're worth." "Guess so." "But, they do enjoy having lights draped over them at Christmas." "They do look so cute prancing about!" "Yeah!"
there's a scene in Walking with Dinosaurs where a group of Allosauruses is chilling in the shadows under a tree just looking at some Apatosauruses passing by and I always liked, there's also another scene of a female Allosaurus sleeping, lifting her head and going back to sleep
The depiction of a Tyrannosaur sleeping is very interesting to me, and I’d like to throw my hat in the ring. Given what we know of the creature right now, it doesn’t look like it even could get up from a sideways position without help unless it’s tail or neck was incredibly strong, even then getting up would be awkward. What if Tyrannosaurs laid down on their stomachs to sleep, with their legs folded up like a cats or modern bird’s? That way they’d likely be most comfortable, as well as being able to just use their legs to stand, with both their tails and necks available to help if they need it.
Me in school: *hates doing homework * Also me in the damn summer: time to learn about fossils, what wasn’t preserved, and logical hypotheses with little context.
i love the idea of t-rex and carnivore dinosaurs spent their day with sleeping, when not hunting. I mean, lions are the king of savannah and all they do all day is play, sleep, and chill. They only hunt, like 2 or 3 times a week.
yeah and have you hever heard a lion roar AS it chases their prey? I've rarely to never heard a real animal do that yet for some reason all dinosaurs on tv seem to need be making SOME noise at all times. Also they all sound like robotic lion roars for some reason
Also, I know that in this book is an illustration of a single individual of Tenontosaurus with no other dinosaur around. That breaks the cliche-like mold of always showing Tenontosaurus being attacked by Deinonychus in many book illustrations.
Loved the idea for camarasaurus, as my biggest problem with sauropod potreyal is that the animals seem to do nothing but stand around, walk long distances and eat, you never get to see how they rest or cool off or any interpretation of behavior or theory's of behaviors, they just stand or walk
Imagine a dinosaur movie where every dinosaur is imagined differently like this. Like a bunch of people go back to the past and all their knowledge didn't prepare them for what it was actually like. An almost alien world.
by the way there is actually a mummified dinosaur, you get to see the actual dinosaur skin ON the dinosaur and its real, so well preserved that it looks almost like a statue. its a tiny bit cracked here and there but its amazing, its the type of dinosaur that has an armored back. there are a few other mummified dinosaurs but not as good as this armored one edit: i think its called a nodosaur
I love this so much 🥲 as a kid, I've always loved dinosaurs but always questioned how they look and behave in contrast from what they were always portrayed to be
Good to know paleontology science evolves! Like most six year olds obsessed with Dinos, some depictions i.e. Pachycephalosaurus, always confused me. Great content as always
My first thought when hearing about the Leaellynasaura's long tails, given the climate they likely lived in, was the modern snow leopard sometimes wrapping their tails around their young for warmth.
Now I’m imagining a Dilophosaurus baby playing “hide & seek”/“peekaboo” with its frill, except instead of eating its playmate, it wanders away to take a nap with its mom.
I like to think that the trope of “gentle giant” that exists in animals today was also a thing when dinosaurs existed. I’d imagine at least a few large ass behemoth dinos would have the temperament of a horse or elephant. It really puts them in a different light
I rewatched "Jurassic Park" recently, it was really striking how off the mark the representations of dinosaurs were back then. Their "velociraptors" should have instead looked like cassowaries, IMO.
Well the Dinosaurs In Jurrasic park look Unrealistic on purpose, They do that because people find Shrinkwraped Therapods "Cooler" than the chunky slow Humming Hunters that they actually were. Just for example the Raptors In Jurrasic park 3 were explained in an official Jurrasic world website to be a failed "Feathered" dinosaur project by Dr Wu, And the Spinosaur was the first Advanced Genetic Hybrid, Aka the First Attempt to create an indominus rex
I want to note that the general appearance and aesthetic of the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park isn't that unrealistic by modern standards. Yes some of the dinosaurs like the Velociraptors (actually Deinonychus) haven't aged well, but things like the Brachiosaurus and T. rex aren't that off the mark. The levels of fat and muscle are pretty congruent with what we think the animals had nowadays, and the conservative shades of red, brown and grey are not unreasonable for large reptiles. The idea of depicting dinosaurs as thicker and more vibrantly colored than how we often depict them is a great thought experiment, but sometimes the pendulum swings too far in the opposite direction and we can end up with something just as unrealistic.
It's great to see a channel that makes good videos about the more speculative aspects of Palaeontology. Well explained while also keeping in mind that a lot of the speculations are just interesting ideas rather than definitive hypotheses
Considering it probably had no interest, at least as an adult, to waste energy chasing a small human its actually plausible, but if ever given the opportunity I wouldn't try it.
A really informative video. One can clearly see that the person who made this video put a lot of effort into it and has some degree of passion for the subject. Thanks for spreading the beauty of nowaday's paleontology!
I think that paleontologists should make a habit of pairing conservative as well as deeply speculative versions of reconstructions together when presenting things towards the general public and perhaps even towards each other because each one really can be considered equally plausible to some degree.
Someone, XKCD I think, made a venn diagram stating: People who think dinosaurs with feathers aren't scary / People who've never been attacked by an ostrich.
Between this, All Tomorrows and All Todays, C.M Koseman managed to make humans and modern animals into the scary monsters and dinosaurs into the normal, wholesome animals.
It makes me wonder if the reason why dinosaurs were commonly drawn to be these terrifying giant predatory lizards is that the human mind is naturally too receptive to see horror elements in skeletons of animals. For ages, we have been using skeletons as the imagery of death and inhuman entities so naturally anyone who sees a dinosaur skeleton for the first time will speculate that we're looking at a creature that would tear us to shreds and devour us in one bite in its past life.
The elasmosaurs remind me of giant grass eels, it's such a surreal picture. The therizinosaurus is my favorite though, I love the giant shaggy look like giant sloths
When you remember that dinosaurs are ancestors of birds, you then look at real world bird-like behaviours such as the bizarre courtships of various species of Birds of Paradise, Western Grebes and Prairie Chickens as well as various soft tissues found on various species like Condors and Frigatebirds, it really makes you wonder what we aren't seeing from the fossil record. As well as the limitless possibilities of species that never even got preserved. With tiny sparrow-sized dinosaurs found in amber fossils it even opens up even further possibilities of tiny 'songbird' dinosaurs contrary to the titans we associate with dinosaurs.
Imagine you're a protagonist on some time traveller show and you don't know it yet, however during your walk in the strange forest you all of a sudden encounter these strange tall feathery creatures that sort of resemble penguins in body shape, but all loom together, tall and silent like a feathery forest within the forest of bigger trees. They waddle along like a flock of penguins would, but slowly, more assuredly, and they waddle past you, towering over you and stunning you with their mystique as they hold their massive claws at their side and waddle silently. They look at you, inquisitive as they pass by, some stop for a few moments to sniff, not knowing what you are. And then you recognize the creature you just had an encounter with when one of them reaches its claws up to devour leaves. Therizinosaurus.
This is tremendously fascinating! We're so infatuated with dinosaurs nowadays (just look the money Jurassic Park raked in over the course of all the films) yet our knowledge of them must be staggeringly incomplete. As you point out, behavior rarely fossilizes and it's challenging to reconstruct animals that have been dead for 65,000,000 years just from fossilized bones. Given what we know about biology we can make educated guesses but it's hard to know if what's true today was true 100,000,000 years ago. I applaud the authors for pushing the envelope and encouraging us to think beyond the way we presently think about these ancient animals.
I had this dream recently that a friend of mine had a ton of chickens, and one of them was kind of hidden and it slowly revealed itself and it was like the size of a horse. I was like what type of chicken is that ? how is it supposed to reproduce with the other chickens ? We were laughing about it but in retrospect it was pretty horrifying
the one with the t-rex sleeping really got me. An apex predator, possibly a scavenger, just taking a nap to recharge and gather its strength. i think i'm so used to seeing a t-rex ready to strike or in some sort of chase scene / battle that i forget sometims that dinosaurs arnt action figures that can be bashed into eachother by human hands to be shown on the tv screen. a certain episode of jurrassic world: camp cretaceous somewhat displays/tackles this too. but i won't get into too much details just for people who haven't watched the season 5 finale.
As for adorable, floofy dinosaurs--have you seen some pictures of the Sinosauropteryx? I would TOTALLY buy a plushie of that thing. FLUFFY RED LEMUR DINOSAUR. XD
the dino in the thumbnail just makes the thing "I just want to hug your soul out" with those arms out and then the beady, emotionless eyes of death staring at you
The camouflage thing for predators doest seem that odd. nearly all birds of prey are, and in fact the flashy coats tend to be one birds that you would consider more vulnerable to predation.
You have a good and clear audio, I really appreciate that. Good microphone with no noise. I think that might be important for getting into the 50-100k subs range where you are bound to go anyway with your very good content.
I would do just about anything to be able to scrub through time just to witness all the creatures that once were. I couldn’t interact, my presence undetected, almost like a ghost. It bothers me so much that we can’t know what these animals actually looked like.
I love the idea of a group of researchers stumbling across a T-rex, but instead of rushing at them and trying to eat them it just kinda lazily looks at them and goes back to sleep. Or maybe a sauropod twisting in all sorts of weird ways trying to scratch an itch, like you see animals do today
I never understand why giant dinosaurs in movies waste so much effort hunting down puny humans when there are bigger and easier preys nearby.
If anything, it's herbivores you should be afraid of. Carnivores will not waste their energy and risk injury on a meal that's more trouble than it's worth. Herbivores will utterly pulp anything that enters their territory that can vaguely even be seen as a threat.
Its probably a bit dated now since the cgi was the main selling point at the time, but the documentary "Walking with Dinosaurs" made an effort to try to depict dinos more like you would see animals in a nature film than monsters from a hollywood movie.
The brand went on to do live shows with animatronics and puppets but the documentary was around a long time before that. It might be nostalgia, but I loved those docos when I saw them on TV.
@@lekhaclam87 The worst example of the opposite of this in movies in Jurassic Park III when the team stumbles across a t-rex feeding off a several ton corpse, and for absolutely no reason what so ever the t-rex abandons the extremely large food source to chase a small group of human's who would be like a single bite to it. Like have you ever seen wolves just abandon a deer carcass to chase crows for hours?
*that one scene in Jurassic Park where the kids are in the car. The T.Rex sees them, the kids brace for its roar... and it just kinda itches its side like a bird and walks away.*
I never knew how much I would like speculative zoology/paleontology
Neither did I but yet here we are!.
I did always know how much I would fucking adore it)
Welcome to the fandom :)
Amazing theme.
A thinking man would think that each one of them didn't look like they came off of an assembly line..
As a kid a had a book about dinosaurs and was obsessed with all these monstrous creatures, but now I'm kinda sad because we won't be able to see them and know for sure about them, only speculate...
Like, ok giant reptiles are cool and stuff, but things we know and see about today's animals is much more cool and fact that we won't see documentary about sleeping trex on natgeo is sad
That's why we need to appreciate the beautiful animals we still have, like the tiger, they've almost disappeared forever 😓😓😓
i really find those animals more interesting now...as a kid i used to think they just fought like most kids but now that i grew up i find it so boring...just fighting? animals do so many more stuff and recently there were some marks on bones that maybe suggested young tyrannosaurus playing with those bones which makes sense if they were to practice their bone crushing bites from young age and animals do practice capabilities by playing today
it gives a such peaceful vibe you know...that is my opinion
Ikr😂
We don't know that, the future is a far away place
Yes this book needs more love since all tomorrow’s got a resurgence
It did inspire a new wave of paleo art painting prehistoric animals looking and behaving more as animals than movie monsters, even got a sequel with “all your yesterdays” where artists submitted their own artwork on the subject.
@@tompotter8703 it also predicted a filter feeding animal
@@truessencemua1718 oh yeah, Tamisiocaris.
Yeah, its so underrated
I don't want furry fanart of chonky parasaurolophus...
Looking at a Utahraptor display, declaring it likely one of the most vicious predators ever, my sister suggested it might have been as chill as modern cheetahs
Or even like lions, which -are- vicious if you're a prey or another predator that might be competition (hyena, for example), but also pretty lazy most of the time, and definitely don't just roam around slaughtering at will. It's why there's old stories of cape buffalo being one of the most dangerous animals in Africa, not the lion or leopard or anything. Hippos, too, rank -way- up there.
It makes you wonder just how dangerous the herbivore dinosaurs -actually were- compared to the predators. I bet some of them were really quite aggressive, just like we see in some modern day large herbivores.
@@TenereAMir That was another conversation my sister and I had at the same dinosaur exhibit. She works with large herbivores and is fully aware of their dangers. We also talked about dinosaurs being pink from a strict shrimp diet, like flamingos
@@MegaKnight2012 now I can’t get the image of a pink spinosaurus out of my head
@@pale_hispanic2429 my sister loved this, and spinosaurus is probably her favorite dinosaur
@@MegaKnight2012 Not a dinosaur, but I can't imagine a Pterodaustro not being pink in real life, that animal was a flamingo before flamingos
I love seeing dinosaurs behaving like actual animals, instead of bloodthirsty, brutal monsters
Same, it seems more natural to act like actual animals
You know what annoys me? When dinosaur shows depict the predatory dinosaur utter a roar as it pounces to catch its prey. Yeah like they'd really do that and alert the prey to their presence.
@@jabujolly9020
I like to think predatory dinosaurs growled or hissed instead of full on roaring.
@@zvenafnazbalji7539 I'd like to think they would only really roar if being territorial to scare something away intentionally, or to call a mate.
the most known dinosaurs are really strange...nothing like what a real dinosaur would look like...they look more like a dragon or some creature that only thinks of killing
I'll be honest: until now I never realised how "normal" dinosaurs could look like, yet on the other side, remembering the hippopotamus skull interpretation gave me the creeps a few years ago. Who would interpret such a chubby creature with a demonic shape? ...Well exactly the same point is here made. We do not know how dionsaurs really looked like. And by knowing the modern nature it is very likely they looked somekind of similar, because back then they inherit the niches modern animals ocupy now. Dinosaurs had millions of years to adapt. They are nor likely to be just simple reptiloids.
It makes you think how normal those creatures really looked like for the modern human...
maybe theyre just giant versions/relatives of the animals we see today. 🤷🏽🕵🏽🤔
Where the hippopotamus skull interpretation can be found?
@@luma4902 it can be found at 1:39
Hippos are demonic
uhh, actual hippos are only cute from say, 1 km away, vertically but also in terms of distance between you and it. they will eat anything that fits in their maws and can flip an 4x4 humvee like a sixth grader flipping a half empty bottle
I guess I'm weird, since I've long adored adorable paleoart. There's just something about seeing a critter typically shown as ferocious doing something cute or just as simple as sleeping that puts a smile on my face. It's also a nice change from the usual, not even exclusively from a scientific perspective. Sometimes it's nice to mix it up a bit.
Yea, some variety is indeed very good
One of my favourites is the image of a t-rex just resting in a forest, and with lips (ie. teeth hidden), it just looks huge and strong without the unrealistic campiness of constantly roaring.
Same, my favorite animals are birds so i just enjoy avian dinousaurs more
They look cute and i would like to pet one, but irl birds can also be hunters and violent (just look at cassowaries)
I've seen an art piece depicting velociraptors with modern pet bird patterns, doing modern pet bird things. I think one was designed to look like a cockatiel
I am bound to propose a game where I give people pictures of skeletons of a Rooster, an Owl, a Turkey, An Ostrich and a peacock to show people how it is impossible to distinguish those animals from their skeletons even though they are so different.
I think it makes pretty clear how dinossaurs were probably much more diverse than we think
Hilariously ingenious.
I think that game already exists.
Well, I mean, the ostrich would be easy to tell apart in comparison to the other, listed birds. It's just the biggest. But as for the rest, that would certainly interesting to see and would maybe get those people who are stuck on the whole "dinosaur = movie monster" concept a push in the right direction
I'll name you one better. Show someone the skulls of a Borzoi, English Bulldog and Labrador and ask them if they are the same species.
I think you should know that the scientists who try to reconstruct what dinosaurs might have looked like don't just take a look at the skeletons and let their imagination do the rest.
I really like the idea of dinosaurs finally being shown as animals not just props or a myth lmao and I also never liked the idea that all dinos looked similar, just hide or scales with sometimes feathers.
Holy crap 3.5k likes? thanks yall lol
Sort of the problem is that the skeleton can only tell us so much, and soft tissue like skin rarely fossilises. Lions and tigers are regarded as different animals even by toddlers due to their different colours and behaviours, but we’d never know for sure if we only knew from fossils, since their skeletons are so similar.
The book also features a segment called “All todays” which satirises the trends of depicting dinosaurs as skin wrapped monsters, applying behaviours to them with little to no evidence or basing reconstructions of animals on distant relatives due to incomplete fossils (as seen with Spinosaurus and Deinocheirus, which turned out to be marginally different from their cousins) by applying all of these artistic tropes to modern animals, such as elephants as emaciated trunkless monsters, humming birds as blood sucking parasites, and snakes having legs and feathers.
@@tompotter8703 yup, already covered on this chanel
How similar different species of animal look tends to vary. You would expect the Asian and African elephants to belong to the same genus but they actually don't. Meanwhile, lions and leopards belong to the same genus despite how different they look.
@@shaunjimbangan1166 wait, they do? Damn, thats cool
@@FalconHgv i mean hell seals are actually sort of close related to bears
Wanted to add that invertibrates like to play, too! I keep aquatic snails, and they do plenty of things to entertain themselves when they're not eating. One species in particular loves to climb to the top of the tank and release themselves, floating down and having a blast.
Cute snail 💛✨
Awwww
My brother had a hermit crab that liked to dig itself underground, wasn't even shedding or anything. It ended up dying
My non-aquatic snail did that too, a lot. Chipped the pointy end of her shell that way.
@marieisthebestsquidsister oh why did you mention that
I would love to see a movie like Jurassic park with this kind of Dinosaurs with a more attractive and creative designs and fascinating behaviors almost like magic.
One of the points of the original novel was that we really aren't prepared for what dinosaurs actually are and our assumptions where probably wrong.
Jurassic World kinda has moments like that, from Blu (or Blue) a raptor playing with Owen, to some dinosaurs having actual emotions instead of "im gonna kill you"
Same with the Raptors in JP3 where they protect their eggs.
@@e4rlygames honestly, jp3 had the most dinosaurs that were actually animals. Except maybe the spino
thats not gonna attract the public now would it?
Also how they would more likely sound like than a big roar & such.
All Yesterdays, All Todays, All Tomorrows. Finally, I have them all.
All right, all mid, all left
Don’t snap your fingers or else the dinosaurs’ll be turned into bricks and paper, the cats’ll be basically the same but do this real weird mating dance, and mankind- well their future might actually be a bit brighter but still
All Your Yesterdays is still missing
Stan pines meme intensefies
E
I have always found it frustrating that people close themselves off to the possibilities of what long dead creatures may have looked or behaved like. Always drawn with no fur or feathers, all muddy greens and browns. But that's not what animals look like!
How could you know a chameleon can change it's colors just looking at it's bones?
How would you know that a peacock has such large impractical feathers?
Or that male lions have beautiful manes?
Could you tell how friendly a dog is, just by looking at it's sharp teeth?
How would you know that glass frogs have clear skin?
You wouldn't. So why assume when you can wonder?
I tend to agree with your overall comment but I don’t think the dog is a good exemple, since it’s a human creation obtained trough selective breeding, its behaviour is by no mean something natural.
@@armandbrn3281 quokka
@@armandbrn3281 quokkas
Tbf I also think you could figure out peacocks have some sort of extensive tail ornamentation like that, using something similar to the method used to determine the pores on dinosaur bones correspond to feather quills.
@@snakewithapen5489 only if by luck a fossil of the quills/feathers survives, which is unlikely.
I think this is part of what makes monster hunter's ecology so fun and interesting. Even in a game explicitly about fighting these incredibly powerful beasts with magical elemental abilities and whatnot. They still take the time to animate things like how Diablos eats cactus because it's actually a herbivore despite its fearsome appearance. Or how Barroth rolls around in the mud and looks adorable doing it.
Actually really aggressive herbivores aren't too off the mark! Most big carnivores wouldn't bother with anything that's more trouble than they're worth, but herbivores? They just wanna wreck stuff. Think territorial hippos or bull elephants on musth.
"Carnotaurus asserts it's dominance" -72 million years ago, colorized
by T-posing, no less
The trex after going fishing " the fish I caught was this big!" *flails mini arms around wildly*
The antelope which are a Tiger's primary prey are colour-blind & so find it difficult to discern between red & green pigments (possibly Deuteranopia), explaining the Tiger's apparently bizarre bright orange & white (with black stripes) fur colourings given it's environment filled with myriad hues of green.
So, once you eliminate colour & compare the tonal values of their coat with that of the surrounding foliage of semi-tropical/tropical plants, a Tiger will vanish into the background in an astonishing exemplar combining both concealing & disruptive camoflage.
Try to imaging all the parallel Predator/Prey Dynamics in Dinosaurs & you start to grasp just how challenging being a Paleoartist truly is. Typically the best that they can do is follow the science, with limited artistic license based on our understanding of modern animals.
Short of finding an entire preserved eye of a prey species that would tell us what colors they could see, it wouldn't be possible to entirely rule out that same sort of 'obvious' (to us) coloration on some predatory species!
I just imagine that they were all wonky looking like gigantic terrifying turkeys 🦃
Same, I just imagine them being similar to modern flightless birds but larger
Probably made similar sounds as well
I want to believe that brachiosaurus is covered in feathers
I own Many Types of birds and every single time I see a Group of Ducklings, I can't help but imagine them as Little Baronyxs Roaming a river, Everything from the Posture, to the walk to the fighting seems like something a Baronyx would do, Same with with turkeys and the Spinosaur, Or a Rooster and a Velociraptor
I can assure you they probably didn't sound or look like a rooster lol (also note that not all dinosaurs had feathers, including Tyrannosaurids)
really cool how everyone is talking about CM Kosemen now.
Can't respect the man for ordering r34 of his own work.
@@thespecter6416 lmao you fr?
@@samshakuskysglasses3370 Yep, I heard it was art of Satyriacs with Gravitals as anal beads. I'll need to do... research
@@thespecter6416 I saw that art recently. Didnt know he was the one who ordered it
@@mcvibing2785 didn't really order it,he just suggested it as joke
It's great to see the "shrinkwrapping of skeletons" slowly change into something more realistic with muscles, fat, feathers and a social life like modern animals.
I got this book when it was first published in 2012. It's such a beautiful piece of art that merge science with fantasy.
Are you really the author of this book?
“Merge science with fantasy” whats the difference?
@@inactivated101 I think you should study a bit more how science works. Just because we can't directly experience the results of science with our own bodies and senses, does not invalidate experiements done with instruments and methods of science. The point of science is to create reproducable results.
Scientific speculation, such as in this book, is there to fill in the gaps of knowledge we do not yet have access to with current data and methodology. Dinosaurs in particular have gone from slow, lumbering lizards to more active and agile avian-like creatures with the progression in paleontology. This transformation in appearance, would not be possible without science. Speculation then become the realm of both frontier and fantasy as scientists and artists can chalk up ideas that could later become testable as new specimens are found or new methodology become available to research those specimens.
I don’t know why but this almost made me cry. Just such beautiful creatures that I shall never know. But for millions of years these creatures lived lives which must have been wondrous. Science is truly amazing
After watching this, some cryptid videos, some speculative zoology videos, the video about inaccurate medieval animal art, the video about strange medieval monsters, and video about codex seraphinianus, makes me want to make an encyclopedia about alien creatures and monsters.
I’m sure gonna make an encyclopedia in the future! I have a project called “Mission: Neovita” where people are forced to leave Earth due to the extreme weather conditions and war. They colonize Mars and then they find a habitable planet in a nearby system and call it Neovita as for “New life”. The planet seams like a paradise, but they end up discovering a race of intelligent aliens living there and so much more.
Crazy fun idea!
To be honest, I just searched the skeleton of a rooster and I can totally see how I would imagine a Jurassic Park looking Dinossaur looking at just the skeleton, rather then imagining the top of the head (comb) , the big chest, the feathered tail...
There is really much we don't know and have to speculate
and there were discoveries which tell us we must speculate more, like edmontosaurus had a fucking fleshy comb and all those unexpected stuff
I thought the part on the Laellynasarus to be interesting because the artists were conflicted on portraying them as cute. This is something I noticed in a lot of speculative biology works, on how sometimes it feels like the artists are obligated to make creatures as "uncute" and "unpretty" as possible. You can make a point that evolution doesn't need to conform to human's beauty standards (like, a birrin could think human are ugly as frick: "haha, they have only two eyes and no wings, what a bunch of fugly losers, my grandma is prettier than them"), but that doesn't stop animals in real world from being colorful and, as the meme says, "shaped like a friend". So I think speculative biology should consider this when making new creatures, obviously when it might work.
This channel is so detailed and is helping me with my speculative evolution project thank you :) ps: plz do part 2 of after man, have other interesting spieces.
You know how sometimes birds fly into windows?
I'm just saying it's a good thing there were no glass windows in the Mesozoic!
"Honey!"
"Yes dear"
"Guess what!"
"What?"
"The stego' ran into the window."
"AGAIN?!"
(sigh) "Again."
"I swear they're more trouble than they're worth."
"Guess so."
"But, they do enjoy having lights draped over them at Christmas."
"They do look so cute prancing about!"
"Yeah!"
Barry the Black-nose Bronto has a very shiny nose... and if you ever see it... some could even say it glows.
My man Kosemen out here showing that dinosaurs could’ve been pretty chill dudes, I dig it
there's a scene in Walking with Dinosaurs where a group of Allosauruses is chilling in the shadows under a tree just looking at some Apatosauruses passing by and I always liked, there's also another scene of a female Allosaurus sleeping, lifting her head and going back to sleep
The depiction of a Tyrannosaur sleeping is very interesting to me, and I’d like to throw my hat in the ring. Given what we know of the creature right now, it doesn’t look like it even could get up from a sideways position without help unless it’s tail or neck was incredibly strong, even then getting up would be awkward.
What if Tyrannosaurs laid down on their stomachs to sleep, with their legs folded up like a cats or modern bird’s? That way they’d likely be most comfortable, as well as being able to just use their legs to stand, with both their tails and necks available to help if they need it.
Me in school: *hates doing homework *
Also me in the damn summer: time to learn about fossils, what wasn’t preserved, and logical hypotheses with little context.
Learning is awesome! I however came to the conclusion that the school system doesn't know how to do it right.
@@lordurvogel6100 I figured it was me learning on my own terms with no consequences if I didn’t do it
I wonder how this channel doesn’t have more subscribers
Traditional depictions: Ripped behemoths
True look: probably fluffy chonks
Both are fine for me^^
i love the idea of t-rex and carnivore dinosaurs spent their day with sleeping, when not hunting.
I mean, lions are the king of savannah and all they do all day is play, sleep, and chill. They only hunt, like 2 or 3 times a week.
yeah and have you hever heard a lion roar AS it chases their prey? I've rarely to never heard a real animal do that yet for some reason all dinosaurs on tv seem to need be making SOME noise at all times. Also they all sound like robotic lion roars for some reason
Also, I know that in this book is an illustration of a single individual of Tenontosaurus with no other dinosaur around. That breaks the cliche-like mold of always showing Tenontosaurus being attacked by Deinonychus in many book illustrations.
Everyone: Talking about dinosaurs
Me: 4:15 did we just get............ *stickbugged* ?
Loved the idea for camarasaurus, as my biggest problem with sauropod potreyal is that the animals seem to do nothing but stand around, walk long distances and eat, you never get to see how they rest or cool off or any interpretation of behavior or theory's of behaviors, they just stand or walk
This is my new most favourite speculative zoology channel ❤️
10:28 Trex sleeping like that is so goddamn cute
Yes! I've been waiting for this!
people need to remember that dinosaurs were animals, not monsters.
I just got done bingeing a bunch of your videos! Great work!
Same!
Imagine a dinosaur movie where every dinosaur is imagined differently like this. Like a bunch of people go back to the past and all their knowledge didn't prepare them for what it was actually like. An almost alien world.
Prehistoric Kindom is kinda like this, i guess all times that T rex were shown they were mostly chilling
by the way there is actually a mummified dinosaur, you get to see the actual dinosaur skin ON the dinosaur and its real, so well preserved that it looks almost like a statue. its a tiny bit cracked here and there but its amazing, its the type of dinosaur that has an armored back. there are a few other mummified dinosaurs but not as good as this armored one
edit: i think its called a nodosaur
I love this so much 🥲 as a kid, I've always loved dinosaurs but always questioned how they look and behave in contrast from what they were always portrayed to be
Finally, Prehistoric Planet gives us the Carnotaurus and his adorable tiny display arms 😭❤
Good to know paleontology science evolves! Like most six year olds obsessed with Dinos, some depictions i.e. Pachycephalosaurus, always confused me.
Great content as always
My first thought when hearing about the Leaellynasaura's long tails, given the climate they likely lived in, was the modern snow leopard sometimes wrapping their tails around their young for warmth.
Good to see CS Koseman finally get the recognition he deserves
Amazing! I always criticized artists making dinosours look too skeletal.
This has become one of my favourite channels.
Now I’m imagining a Dilophosaurus baby playing “hide & seek”/“peekaboo” with its frill, except instead of eating its playmate, it wanders away to take a nap with its mom.
the image of the t-rex sleeping is absolutely adorable, and i love it.
So many of these are included in the new prehistoric planet series it’s impressive
I discovered this channel 2 days ago. I watched everything and was sad that there is nothing new. Then this!!
I like to think that the trope of “gentle giant” that exists in animals today was also a thing when dinosaurs existed. I’d imagine at least a few large ass behemoth dinos would have the temperament of a horse or elephant. It really puts them in a different light
A herd of enraged Argentinosauruses is a terrifying thought.
Just wanna say, the parrot footage you showed at the beginning is super cute! Lovely little birdies!
I rewatched "Jurassic Park" recently, it was really striking how off the mark the representations of dinosaurs were back then. Their "velociraptors" should have instead looked like cassowaries, IMO.
Well the Dinosaurs In Jurrasic park look Unrealistic on purpose, They do that because people find Shrinkwraped Therapods "Cooler" than the chunky slow Humming Hunters that they actually were. Just for example the Raptors In Jurrasic park 3 were explained in an official Jurrasic world website to be a failed "Feathered" dinosaur project by Dr Wu, And the Spinosaur was the first Advanced Genetic Hybrid, Aka the First Attempt to create an indominus rex
Actually veloceraptors, were about 3ft tall. So more like...angry pheasants. Lol
Yup. I saw a cassowary in a local zoo some years ago and my immediate thought was : velociraptor.
@@hungchoonghow5857 weird, shouldn’t your immediate thought have been: cassowary!
I want to note that the general appearance and aesthetic of the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park isn't that unrealistic by modern standards. Yes some of the dinosaurs like the Velociraptors (actually Deinonychus) haven't aged well, but things like the Brachiosaurus and T. rex aren't that off the mark. The levels of fat and muscle are pretty congruent with what we think the animals had nowadays, and the conservative shades of red, brown and grey are not unreasonable for large reptiles. The idea of depicting dinosaurs as thicker and more vibrantly colored than how we often depict them is a great thought experiment, but sometimes the pendulum swings too far in the opposite direction and we can end up with something just as unrealistic.
It's great to see a channel that makes good videos about the more speculative aspects of Palaeontology. Well explained while also keeping in mind that a lot of the speculations are just interesting ideas rather than definitive hypotheses
What if the T-Rex was only potentially dangerous, like a cheetah, and actually chill af and you could pet it?
Considering it probably had no interest, at least as an adult, to waste energy chasing a small human its actually plausible, but if ever given the opportunity I wouldn't try it.
A really informative video. One can clearly see that the person who made this video put a lot of effort into it and has some degree of passion for the subject. Thanks for spreading the beauty of nowaday's paleontology!
10:19 that dog winked at me like it's in a commercial
oh my god you put the subtitles in portuguese!! Thank you very much for your attention and for placing my order!!
I think that paleontologists should make a habit of pairing conservative as well as deeply speculative versions of reconstructions together when presenting things towards the general public and perhaps even towards each other because each one really can be considered equally plausible to some degree.
That trex sleeping is the most adorable thing i have seen
I like dinosaurs being seen as animals, like playing and all that makes it seem more ‘realistic’
This channel is EXPLODING and I’m v happy abt it
“You can see the feathers make it less scary” that thing looks death incarnate
Someone, XKCD I think, made a venn diagram stating: People who think dinosaurs with feathers aren't scary / People who've never been attacked by an ostrich.
@@Stothehighest why osterich?
Aren't geese deadly enought?
Between this, All Tomorrows and All Todays, C.M Koseman managed to make humans and modern animals into the scary monsters and dinosaurs into the normal, wholesome animals.
It makes me wonder if the reason why dinosaurs were commonly drawn to be these terrifying giant predatory lizards is that the human mind is naturally too receptive to see horror elements in skeletons of animals. For ages, we have been using skeletons as the imagery of death and inhuman entities so naturally anyone who sees a dinosaur skeleton for the first time will speculate that we're looking at a creature that would tear us to shreds and devour us in one bite in its past life.
This channel is so high quality ! Great research, interesting subjects, professional voiceover and editing : congrats !
05:51 - "The thick layer of feathers certainly makes the animal look less frightening...." Uh, no it doesn't.
Imagine opium bird's dark skin sub species
This channel has content similar to huge channels. I love it, keep up the good work.
6:58 I want one
Sadly they didn't exist. If only we found their DNA before they were vanish.
Been watching this all afternoon. Subscribed, really enjoying this channel so far.
The elasmosaurs remind me of giant grass eels, it's such a surreal picture. The therizinosaurus is my favorite though, I love the giant shaggy look like giant sloths
I absolutely love your channel! Keep up the good and weird work!
When you remember that dinosaurs are ancestors of birds, you then look at real world bird-like behaviours such as the bizarre courtships of various species of Birds of Paradise, Western Grebes and Prairie Chickens as well as various soft tissues found on various species like Condors and Frigatebirds, it really makes you wonder what we aren't seeing from the fossil record. As well as the limitless possibilities of species that never even got preserved. With tiny sparrow-sized dinosaurs found in amber fossils it even opens up even further possibilities of tiny 'songbird' dinosaurs contrary to the titans we associate with dinosaurs.
9:19 Well, crocodiles can also climb trees, which is not a well-known fact, yet we live in the same time period as them.
Nature is full of surprises .
10:50 those are some chonky lions absolute units
Fr
Diamond in the rough channel right here, Boyz.
0:33 NEMO THE DINASOUR
The plesiosaur neck competition was absolutely mind boggling because it was 100% believable...
Imagine you're a protagonist on some time traveller show and you don't know it yet, however during your walk in the strange forest you all of a sudden encounter these strange tall feathery creatures that sort of resemble penguins in body shape, but all loom together, tall and silent like a feathery forest within the forest of bigger trees. They waddle along like a flock of penguins would, but slowly, more assuredly, and they waddle past you, towering over you and stunning you with their mystique as they hold their massive claws at their side and waddle silently. They look at you, inquisitive as they pass by, some stop for a few moments to sniff, not knowing what you are. And then you recognize the creature you just had an encounter with when one of them reaches its claws up to devour leaves.
Therizinosaurus.
Dude, these videos are so good honestly. I know you're gonna do a video about all tomorrow's next AND I CANNOT F@%$!ING WAIT!!!!!!
For some reason I find cute a T. Rex slepping on it's side
This is tremendously fascinating! We're so infatuated with dinosaurs nowadays (just look the money Jurassic Park raked in over the course of all the films) yet our knowledge of them must be staggeringly incomplete. As you point out, behavior rarely fossilizes and it's challenging to reconstruct animals that have been dead for 65,000,000 years just from fossilized bones. Given what we know about biology we can make educated guesses but it's hard to know if what's true today was true 100,000,000 years ago. I applaud the authors for pushing the envelope and encouraging us to think beyond the way we presently think about these ancient animals.
I had this dream recently that a friend of mine had a ton of chickens, and one of them was kind of hidden and it slowly revealed itself and it was like the size of a horse. I was like what type of chicken is that ? how is it supposed to reproduce with the other chickens ? We were laughing about it but in retrospect it was pretty horrifying
the one with the t-rex sleeping really got me.
An apex predator, possibly a scavenger, just taking a nap to recharge and gather its strength. i think i'm so used to seeing a t-rex ready to strike or in some sort of chase scene / battle that i forget sometims that dinosaurs arnt action figures that can be bashed into eachother by human hands to be shown on the tv screen.
a certain episode of jurrassic world: camp cretaceous somewhat displays/tackles this too. but i won't get into too much details just for people who haven't watched the season 5 finale.
As for adorable, floofy dinosaurs--have you seen some pictures of the Sinosauropteryx? I would TOTALLY buy a plushie of that thing. FLUFFY RED LEMUR DINOSAUR. XD
Tigers blend into the jungle, and this is a wonderful exploration of the homogenization of Dinosaurae.
these books are very interesting
I've seen the picture of sauropod, covered in black and white stripes like a zebra and this really shows how unexpected such interpretations can be
the elasmosarus's necks looks like the parasitic pinworms
the dino in the thumbnail just makes the thing "I just want to hug your soul out" with those arms out and then the beady, emotionless eyes of death staring at you
The camouflage thing for predators doest seem that odd. nearly all birds of prey are, and in fact the flashy coats tend to be one birds that you would consider more vulnerable to predation.
maybe because prey animals need that impressive mate-attracting coloration to continually repopulate?
You have a good and clear audio, I really appreciate that. Good microphone with no noise. I think that might be important for getting into the 50-100k subs range where you are bound to go anyway with your very good content.
I would do just about anything to be able to scrub through time just to witness all the creatures that once were. I couldn’t interact, my presence undetected, almost like a ghost. It bothers me so much that we can’t know what these animals actually looked like.
Something simple like this makes me feel like I have been blind for most of my life