I represented myself Pro Se in a trial by Jury in Marin County, where I was charged with holding my two daughters for 5 extra days. After the trial, I was told that the Jury was hung. But apparently neither the jury nor the judge stated in court that there was a finding of Guilt. No sentence was imposed and I was granted probation without imposition of a sentence. In California, the Supreme Court has, in six cases, declared that a conviction requires a finding of Guilt and a sentence. The Supreme Court clearly stated that when there is no sentence imposed, there is no conviction. However, the Marin Court has told the Attorney General that I was convicted. The attorney general told the FBI that I was a convicted felon and the FBI claims that I have been convicted of a felony.. I am trying to correct the fraud that has been carried against me and which has denied my 2 daughters a father for 17 years. Please tell me whether you may have an interest in this case and whether you believe that I am correct in my interpretation of the criminal law in California.. Regards John Olagues
John, you may be able to hire us to look into your record if that is something you are interested in. Unfortunately, we can't determine whether or not your interpretation of the law is correct without more information. Please give us a call at 510-879-7549 to speak with a member of our team to provide more details about your situation and see if we are able to assist you.
@@TheNievesLawFirmAPC hey good video. Could you help me understand if there’s a state level writ of habeas corpus (post conviction) for Washington state? I feel like it’s one of the state remedies that needs to be exhausted before the federal one. I reached out to my local county clerks office they said they aren’t even aware of such a form for that writ here. Is it possible to skip over the state level writ? Thanks again, for the help.
So why is it that a man who put on a black robe get to decide on another man's welfare. Who gave him that delegation of authority? My understanding of the writ is that you should be given pen and paper to write the writ if your arrest was not lawful. Not all this stuff that you have explained.
I represented myself Pro Se in a trial by Jury in Marin County, where I was charged with holding my two daughters for 5 extra days.
After the trial, I was told that the Jury was hung. But apparently neither the jury nor the judge stated in court that there was a finding of Guilt. No sentence was imposed and I was granted probation without imposition of a sentence. In California, the Supreme Court has, in six cases, declared that a conviction requires a finding of Guilt and a sentence. The Supreme Court clearly stated that when there is no sentence imposed, there is no conviction. However, the Marin Court has told the Attorney General that I was convicted. The attorney general told the FBI that I was a convicted felon and the FBI claims that I have been convicted of a felony..
I am trying to correct the fraud that has been carried against me and which has denied my 2 daughters a father for 17 years.
Please tell me whether you may have an interest in this case and whether you believe that I am correct in my interpretation of the criminal law in California..
Regards
John Olagues
John, you may be able to hire us to look into your record if that is something you are interested in. Unfortunately, we can't determine whether or not your interpretation of the law is correct without more information. Please give us a call at 510-879-7549 to speak with a member of our team to provide more details about your situation and see if we are able to assist you.
If you accepted "probation," then you must have agreed, because you acquiesced by your silence, to object.
Administrative process . Study it
@@TheNievesLawFirmAPC hey good video. Could you help me understand if there’s a state level writ of habeas corpus (post conviction) for Washington state? I feel like it’s one of the state remedies that needs to be exhausted before the federal one.
I reached out to my local county clerks office they said they aren’t even aware of such a form for that writ here. Is it possible to skip over the state level writ?
Thanks again, for the help.
So why is it that a man who put on a black robe get to decide on another man's welfare. Who gave him that delegation of authority? My understanding of the writ is that you should be given pen and paper to write the writ if your arrest was not lawful. Not all this stuff that you have explained.