This Calculator Is Overpowered! (fx8200AU unboxing and review)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 окт 2024
- EXAM APPROVED!
The fx8200AU is the best calculator I've ever used. It has so many features, which this video will briefly cover.
Learn More: casioeducation.com.au/fx-8200-au/
Main Channel (game development): @donut_ask
MUSIC CREDITS
'Cirrus' by Scott Buckley - released under CC-BY 4.0. www.scottbuckley.com.au
Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
guys i think my ext 2 marks just increased by 2% so unbelievably worth
yes!
Bro you rlly don’t need a calculator that much for ext. 2. I honestly don’t think I used a calculator in that exam lol. You defs need one for adv. but it’s all just algebra in the extensions lol
this video convinced me to view math as a competitive field and a hobby. thanks.
just got a fx-991es+ 2nd ed. for my birthday, it has a lot of functions like this one
991 es + vs cw?
@@aywang7548 searching a bit I've found that cw is better but slower. I'm fine with es though
I seriously got this so I could compute the cubic formula and it worked. Runs out of space in just one function but if you do f(x) + g(x) and then just define your variables a, b, c, d the shit works!
Bro pulled up with the Mr Beast subtitles on a calculator video 😭
MR BEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAASSST!
the variable thing sold me the calculator thats very useful
think you forgot one of the other really nice feature being the function analysis table. Allows you to quickly see the value of your f(x) and g(x) for any value of x.
works for any other calc
My 991 ex has the undo button but I had forgotten about it long ago. I realised it just now. Gosh! I could have saved so many times retyping my calculations
POV: You've been hyperfixating on voltage glitching your TI-30xiis, but your hand cramps now, so your on RUclips.
But then you remember some Casio calculators have bugs.
Vector mode, change of log base, summation option were all present in fx 991 ex and fx 991 es as well.
If you need change of base in a calculator, you might want to consider dropping out in maths
Love your enthusiasm - if you're that buzzed about this then take a look at some of the HP classics like the 42S. That machine is legendary. A little pricey these days, but for a standard size scientific it truly is the most powerful in the world. Even does matrices and programming including graphics. Check it out
Does it saves the operations and results after shutting it down, or while switching modes?
Make sure it has complex mode and you have op calculator
For the most overpowered, have “solve for X” thing, sinh(),cosh(),… , logarithm with custom bases, variables, summation and most importantly inch to cm convention
Isnt the fx991DE-X Approved for you?
Advanced math moment
Imagine doing Advanced math smh.
fr ext on top@@whocares4598
This is not the most powerful. It is the most powerful that is approved by nesa. that dosent mean it's the most powerful.
What is the most powerful not approved??
@@SkylerThomes991 cw. It's the most powerful non programming calculator in the world. I have it. It's really really good
@@SkylerThomes basically any graphing calc
@@SkylerThomes HP48
@cassiebenavides6246 Good question. A few HP calculators, a few Casio calculators, and a few Texas Instruments calculators are in the running. But I believe that a few phone apps have them beat.
Is this an aussie version of the 991CW?
this is cheaper than the fx-100au for some reason
Bruh this video
Made my dad buy the best calculator I have ever used
HUUUGEEE, THIS IS A GAME CHANGER
Isn't this CW?
Better videos: www.youtube.com/@donut_ask
Learn more: casioeducation.com.au/fx-8200-au/
By the way can you remove the back cover?
I need to know this too!
@@anneog yes you can, I finally found it
@@sunnylm2045 Me too! It's in another video about a different model. Now it comes off easily but at first it seemed stuck!
Very nice calculator, when it will arrive in the US?
It's for Australia only, hence the name fx8200AU
@@coolcat-nq4mj It exists, branded as the fx-991CW in the US. They may have changed some features to meet US exam requirements but most of the core functionality is still there.
Does it do base-n (decimal / hexadecimal / binary / octal) like fx-100au does?
Yes
No.
@@barry2718 I thought not. Thanks.
Most powerful non-programmable in my opinion
More powerful than a HP Prime G2? A SwissMicro DM42? A Numworks? A TI-92? (iffy, but could be)? A freaking TI-Nspire? Is it faster than a speeding bullet? Able to leap tall buildings in a single bound?
Do you even know what processor it uses? Does it use a processor, or is it gnome-powered? (which admittedly would be cool). And I'll freely concede that anything with a battery beats my old slide rule. But I would lay off statements such as "Most overpowered..." You don't want to become one of *those* YT sites...
The 8200 kind of has a tiny screen, still better than the LEDs of the 70's... And did I blink and miss how you program it? :) As for buttons, my TI-92 has 80. Granted that it is so big that you could use it as a wheel chock. But it does have 80 buttons. Which is some amount larger than 48... And a Motorola 68000 CPU.
So I did some research and apparently "Exact values" is a thing for you. So what do "Exact values" mean to me? Did I mention slide rules? Ever hear of Log tables (usually located in the back of the school math book)
And on a happy note, my Casio fx-890P showed up today from Japan.
No programming ability? Really? How in the heck are you supposed to play lunar lander?
yeah but those arent nesa approved
@@Slugcat317 So, not all that powerful, just approved for the purpose. :)
How are you liking the fx-890P? Not sure I need one, but crazy how capable it is given its age.
He means it’s the most overpowered for the price.
@@ArturoGarzaID Ah, are you saying that words failed him? That certainly wasn't the impression that I got. If anything, he is far more capable than I am in the "being wordy" department.
This is what I heard: "This is the most overpowered calculator in the world." Not a lot of room for misinterpretation...
He even created a graphic stating the same thing. So, I'm fairly certain of what I heard and read. I'm easily confused, but even I have my limits.
Since we're running a race to the bottom, here's a cheaper one that compares well to the Casio: Texas Instruments TI-36X Pro.
In other news, I have a pretty little Sharp PC-G850VS on its way from Japan. Did you know that you can create programs on it in Assembler? How cool is that?!
And because of you, I found two non-working TI-92 calculators for ~$27 USD - with shipping (they are cheap donors so they don't need to work). Thank you for that! There's a couple of Hackaday projects to convert TI-92 calculators to a color screen running a Raspberry Pi.
BTW, the one thing that TI does well is that they don't do a particularly good job of locking down their calculators. Very hackable, and there are a ton of homebrew programs out there for them. Check out ticalc dot org if you are interested.
Isn’t that the same with Casio fx-991 CW
Naah 991 cw is much more superior than this
@@tombesports7213 How is the 991cw superior? They look the same.
That one isn’t nesa approved
@@DerekDavis213bruh. Cw has more options. Like it has 13 apps in the home menu. Also there are many scientific constants and other stuff like 991 ex. I think 991 cw has better processing speed than the au one
imo 991 EX is best@@tombesports7213
the box opens on the bottom... not at the hanging ear...
as I can see, you never used EX. These new (CW family) calculators are a big step backward (except f() g() definition).
Naah they aren't going backward that much. As i can see, You didn't even use a cw calculator. I use both of them (ex and cw). Cw is much faster than ex but yea you have to press a lot of button in cw. That's the only negative thing you can say about cw
User interface wise, correct. About the only thing I think they improved is the function definition and the solve, which is much more stable than before. Almost everything else is worse -- I particular dislike the change in behavior of the decimal exponent button (you no longer can enter a number with an decimal exponent like 1.4e6, it always treats it as a product of the 1.4 and the 10⁶. Also, this whole menu thing is getting ridiculous, like the menu for output options with the "FORMAT" (yes, you could use the SHIFT-EXE, but if you already have done a calculation and press it, it starts a new calculation, which messes up all the UI improvements they made with regards to user history).
I don't know about hardware/processing speed as I think that's irrelevant for a school calculator for decades.
Where did u bought it?
it's available at office works
Find it somewhere in a shop
where is the integration ;(
Damn, didn’t make it to the main channel 😭😭
I made the fx8200 in Scratch!
@@charlesbelcastroI recreated the twin towers in scratch
@@charlesbelcastroI violated the Geneva convention in scratch
🤨📷
@@liveson08I recreated a guy commenting about recreating the twin towers in scratch in a unity emulator built in scratch
how do you convert fraction to decimal? I can't find the s-d button
Format button?
Format then press decimal
brilliant
Is there female characters?
Nice calculater I have a calculater that can text
lol the camera quality sucks
HOW DO I DO A % PLS IM IN BUSINESS RN AND I CANT DO ITTT
Press the catalog button, probability then percentage
Just do /100,x1/100
but can it run doom?
no
@@vahetarayanthey’ve done it on less
Lol. This is a kids toy. Try a real calculator like the hp 42 s
HP 42s: low-res LCD screen, slow, and made with a 1970's mindset. For young engineers today, RPN is dead.
@@DerekDavis213That's true, but nevertheless most things engineers do is math. So, craving for good tools should be the first thing engineers do. I also use modern calculator like fx 991 classwiz. Most calculators there days are purely made for students and teachers and not to do real work with them. I own about 20 Pocket Calculators and only the old HP models i would call a solution for engineers. The more modern ones are just for students doing classes made for calculators.
TI has some very strange models that offer useless things like random coin toll apps but are not able to work with more than 10 significant numbers. Also computer science functions are implemented as a toy
@@markusfischhaber8178 If you like the HP 42s, there are some excellent emulators for Android phones.
And I am curious how many engineers today need more than 10 significant digits? haha
@@markusfischhaber8178My TI's can work with more than 10 Sig. Dig.'s. But they are awkward to use requiring excessive keystrokes. An older scientific calculator is easier to use and sometimes faster.
This calculator clearly wasn't made by people who do math, probably just product designers who don't use calculators. Why on earth would you need to press shift to use ln or log10? Seriously, when are you actually going to use log a x when you can just use change of base like how normal people do it?
Another NESA common L, I thought those exact values tested your ability to manipulate fractions, now it is automated. Who is in charge of NESA? They made English compulsory and allowed this calculator which allows stupid people to get high marks.... Nesa might as well allow calculators with computer algebra systems that can do integration and differentiation
"Let's just don't hope the exams don't get any harder because of it" quite egotistical and self centred, do you realise there are many people who don't have the new calculators will be disadvantaged just because stupid NESA allowed it?
Here’s my perspective: These fancy functions aren’t going to be much help if you don’t actually understand how they work. (Competent) teachers expect you to show work, you can’t just write the answer. This calculator isn’t going to magically help people that don’t understand what they’re doing to suddenly get a passing grade, but it will help people who do know what they’re doing to save time by not having to check and double check their fractions during an exam.
Sure, people using traditional 1-line calculators will be at a disadvantage, but only because they need to redo calculations in order to check them. On this thing or any suitably advanced scientific calculator, you just need to peek at the history to make sure you typed everything in right. But compared to how much I’ve spent on college and textbooks, the price of this calculator is a mere drop in the bucket.
overpower
Not a great calculator. A lot of functional has been moved from button combinations to deep menus, as if to appeal to the new generation, but all they did - was produce a clunky ineffective calculator with features no one asked for. If you're in the market for a calculator, whether you are a high school student or doing advanced maths in uni - buy casio fx-991ex, you won't regret it.
Oj
CA it game