Mahabharat Unravelled: Debunking Myths spread against Vyasadev's Mahabharat;

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 44

  • @GandarDooM
    @GandarDooM 3 года назад +16

    Lord Vishnu is so merciful that He gives even the worst Ashuras a period for their flourishing. Kali yuga is their spring.
    It is interesting that the Slavs until their baptism celebrated one of the demigods named Svarog or Svarozhich whose name coincides with the name of the second Manu, Swarochisha Manu.
    Greetings to the host and his lovely guest from Rab in Croatia!

    • @sattology
      @sattology  3 года назад +3

      You are right.

    • @GandarDooM
      @GandarDooM 3 года назад

      @@sattology Thank You so much for your respond !
      Please I have one super interesting question about astrology/astronomy and yugas for one of your future guests, where I can send it to you because it is too big to write in a comment.

  • @dhirajjadhav29
    @dhirajjadhav29 3 года назад +6

    Beautiful lady explained such beautiful topic in beautiful way.

  • @kishansingh-nr6xk
    @kishansingh-nr6xk 2 года назад +3

    Mr Aditya you are doing a great service to our Hindu 🕉 religion God bless you

  • @cheenbang
    @cheenbang 3 года назад +6

    Thank you for this talk on on demystifyfying our Ithihaasas..

  • @sanatanidotnetdharmaplatfo3991
    @sanatanidotnetdharmaplatfo3991 3 года назад +4

    Thank you ami didi and Aditya bhai for ur work

    • @sattology
      @sattology  3 года назад +1

      Thank you so much 😀

  • @chetanbandekar3338
    @chetanbandekar3338 3 года назад +5

    Enlightening 🙏

  • @maulikmithani447
    @maulikmithani447 3 года назад +1

    Pandavs were also from Kuru dynasty so they can also be referred as kauravs ,its just that they were sons of Pandu they were called Pandavs or may be to distinguish between both sides of cousins.

  • @nitinpatil8446
    @nitinpatil8446 3 года назад +2

    Thanks! This discussion should in Hindi.

  • @yogesswaran9845
    @yogesswaran9845 2 года назад +1

    The world power to be are afraid of us and our brains of the Rishi.

  • @sontuudaybhasker5187
    @sontuudaybhasker5187 3 года назад +1

    Jambhudwepa.. Bharatha varsha....Bharatha khanda....... are all three different expanses

  • @lalithdas2093
    @lalithdas2093 3 года назад +4

    Thanks sir. .🙏

  • @Bharatvarsh45
    @Bharatvarsh45 3 года назад +3

    Thanks for this information

  • @kushpandey251
    @kushpandey251 3 года назад +2

    Is Jayasamhita also another name of Mahabharata?

    • @sattology
      @sattology  3 года назад +4

      All histories from Vedas are commonly referred to as Jaya

    • @buttegowda
      @buttegowda 3 года назад +1

      Yes jaya is another name. Vyasa himself says ‘ जयॊ नामॆतिहासॊयम् in adiparva.

  • @rubabu
    @rubabu 3 года назад

    For the political question on western textbooks wrong writing of MB, looks like you should have asked that question to political administrators or someone from Rajiv Malhotra school

  • @dananjayask7982
    @dananjayask7982 2 года назад +1

    the biggest misunderstanding in mahabharat is about arjun.. relationship between arjun and krishna.. what people now understand is very biased because of the blind believe that people get from krishna worshipper.. if you could know mahabharat before the krishna worshipper existing then you'll understand the real mahabharat.. bhagavad gita is not the real part of mahabharat.. it was written hundred maybe thousand years after mahabharat.. mahabharat never know krishna in brindavan with all his gopi.. krishna that mahabharat know is krishna whom is the cousin of arjun and he look for arjun because he need his help to destroy jarasandh the magadh king that already destroy his country and made him move to gujarat .. so krishna is need arjun and pandav .. and he has something to offer in return.. at the end of the day arjun and pandav give the hastinapur to parikshit,arjun's grandson, and indraprastha to bajra,grandson of krishna.. so,pragmatically we can say that arjun and krishna got all the benefit from bharatayudha .. why nobody trying to investigate what happen to both grandson of the two..??? why we only focus on janamejaya ..son of parikshit who then make us got mahabharat like what wehave today??? where is bajra ??? we need to understand mahabharat much much deeper and throw away all the biased part.

    • @19683
      @19683 Год назад

      Source?

  • @aronwilliam8547
    @aronwilliam8547 3 года назад +1

    I have a doubt in the basic concept itself. Ie.,
    A. Pandu has abandoned the Kingdom. Went to exile. Then how will it become their right?
    B. No cousin today will claim I am the next CEO of my uncle's company and their house. No uncle will give it too.
    Then how can the 5 brothers claim their right over a country? They were living in the forest happily. They should continue to live there, find a job and live with it.

    • @ni3070
      @ni3070 3 года назад +2

      Pandu took break from work, sabbatical of sorts if you will.......and went away, in the mean time Dhritarashtra wasn't made King, he was made representative of King, that is as such his heirs didn't have any legal right over the throne. So, when Pandu has sons, the very purpose of him taking a break is solved, that is he is not heirless anymore......hence, they have right on the throne
      What's more? Ancient India had joint family system so eldest child was made King amongst all brothers (reference Ramayan, Ram advising Sugriv to declare Bali's son heir apparent) and kingdom comes under ancestral right......to put that in perspective in today's time......what if the company was of Grandfather? Then all grandchildren have rights, right?

    • @aronwilliam8547
      @aronwilliam8547 3 года назад

      @@ni3070 Thank you firstly.
      Secondly, speaking of eldest son rule. There was a King called Bharata, in the same Puru clan. He did not consider any of his sons as the King. So the concept of eldest son rule is ruled out right?

    • @ni3070
      @ni3070 3 года назад +2

      @@aronwilliam8547 ofcourse, capability is one aspect, and by that Yudhishthir is best, but even if we assume the rest being constant, that Yudhishthir and Duryodhan are equally capable, even so, Yudhishthir is eldest so will get the throne.

    • @aronwilliam8547
      @aronwilliam8547 3 года назад

      @@ni3070 May I please know your sources? Is it Ami's book? Or Bramari scriptures? Preserved in Indian archives?

    • @ni3070
      @ni3070 3 года назад +1

      @@aronwilliam8547 😅I just have heard Mahabharat from childhood from elders and have keen interest on same

  • @mituls20001
    @mituls20001 3 года назад +1

    It seems she has limited knowledge on jambudweep. The lok is described in details in Jain aagams.
    Ucan check for dr Sanjeev Godha. He is Jain scholsr. He has shown entire universe using 3D model.
    Bharat was sin of lord Rishabhdev / Aadinath.even Vedas have references for it. Ther is bookon lord Rishabhdev by Mr Champat Rai Jain. He has collected lot of shlokas fr Vedas for cross referencing

  • @manojnair944
    @manojnair944 2 года назад

    Sorry do not agree no American school talks about Mahabharata. Stop this nonsense