There was nothing relevant "hidden." There were ZERO damages demonstrated and ZERO corruption exposed. This is nothing but a childish game that aimed to "get" certain people and accumulate attorney fees to collect. The case was thrown out on appeal.
I'm still waiting for the proverbial "I can't recall" that ALL the other deponents used. Looks like she did things correctly, not counting honest mistakes but she is DEFINITELY NOT hiding anything. Bless her
“Kamala Harris” ahh , Im star ⭐️ struck 😌 Martha seems truthful in her responses. At times I want to jump through the screen and tell the deposing attorney to stop being tough on her because I like her!
It is so dishonest and slimy for Briggs to pretend that someone giving a MISTAKEN answer means that they person committed perjury. He obviously beats off while saying "Under penalty of perjury... UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY!!!!!"
This lady is NOT lying... she made honest mistakes and the attorney is now harrassing her... he is blinded by the amount of money he is going to get and not seeing how honest she is ::(:(
Briggs, the deposing attorney, is a con man/shyster. This was a bogus lawsuit that he filed on a behalf of an organization that was started, at least in part, by him so that he could file a ridiculous lawsuit in order to manufacture legal fees for himself. There were no damages associated with anything connected to this lawsuit. It was thrown out of court on appeal. He was trying to get $930k for this nonsense and he got ZERO. LMAO. There was no corruption, but even if there was, he couldn't demonstrate any damages to his made up plaintiff. "They" didn't have standing. It was a bogus suit from the get go.
WOW... it seems that Martha is the only 1 not trying to hide something and her body language is telling the truth!!! Hallelujah
There was nothing relevant "hidden." There were ZERO damages demonstrated and ZERO corruption exposed. This is nothing but a childish game that aimed to "get" certain people and accumulate attorney fees to collect. The case was thrown out on appeal.
I'm still waiting for the proverbial "I can't recall" that ALL the other deponents used. Looks like she did things correctly, not counting honest mistakes but she is DEFINITELY NOT hiding anything. Bless her
“Kamala Harris” ahh , Im star ⭐️ struck 😌
Martha seems truthful in her responses. At times I want to jump through the screen and tell the deposing attorney to stop being tough on her because I like her!
It is so dishonest and slimy for Briggs to pretend that someone giving a MISTAKEN answer means that they person committed perjury. He obviously beats off while saying "Under penalty of perjury... UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY!!!!!"
This lady is NOT lying... she made honest mistakes and the attorney is now harrassing her... he is blinded by the amount of money he is going to get and not seeing how honest she is ::(:(
She's guilty she didn't do her job, and the attorney is fantastic she's hiding behind the old Lady card
Briggs, the deposing attorney, is a con man/shyster. This was a bogus lawsuit that he filed on a behalf of an organization that was started, at least in part, by him so that he could file a ridiculous lawsuit in order to manufacture legal fees for himself. There were no damages associated with anything connected to this lawsuit. It was thrown out of court on appeal. He was trying to get $930k for this nonsense and he got ZERO. LMAO. There was no corruption, but even if there was, he couldn't demonstrate any damages to his made up plaintiff. "They" didn't have standing. It was a bogus suit from the get go.