morons reading a script mate, I had an ex-cop (he's now a support worker for my partner who's dealing with a serious crime) and I mentioned how so many people quote policies as doctrine and just read a script...he told me how he was in 999 call centre and his mate was taking a call for someone to "come sort her daughter out", she was basically just having a tantrum..he went off script and told her this isn't a 999 situation and to not call again unless its an emergency...he got the sack...for using his brain.
@@temparalflux914 crazy mate, they’re mad with the stuff they get away with - literally breaking the law in a lot of cases - and then punished for actually helping people 🙄
literally cant walk down a fucking street without them harassing you for private information , this is insane it has to stop NOW i dont believe a fucking word they say !
Every premise they provided to demand to see his details/face are all perfectly legal, i.e., it is legal to wear a hat in public, it is legal to wear sunglasses in public, it is legal to wear a face mask in public (at one point it was illegal not too). They are demanding to see his face/id because he is doing what is lawful.
@@m4rt1n0nY0utub3 It was never illegal not to wear a mask, these are the rights that most auditors ignored, It's bizarre, it's almost like they are hired by the controllers to make us lose faith in the police and public servants, ready for a-g-e-n-d-a-2030
If they can’t even stick to their own policy of telling the public they’re recording them with body worn cameras or facial recognition, what makes you think they will stick to their own data collection policies regarding facial recognition.!?
He says the system is used for: _"People that we're looking for, that have been put into the system, specific people . . . if they came down this area [sic] they could identify them, and we'd go talk to them."_ The fact that 2 officers approached Absolute Audits, questioned him, asked for his details (etc) proves this is bullshit, he wasn't one of these specific people, he wasn't in their system, yet he still got stopped and questioned. Like every other police power this will be abused, misused and expanded way beyond its original scope.
@@davelordy 100% and this year the 'Government' are again looking to give the police even more powers and the police are looking for this 'because' they haven't enough? Yup you can get more, but show us you don't already abuse the ones you have (That's almost impossible thanks to RUclips)
@@SofianeHaciane Yep again. They are supposed to be the most trustworthy of all, yet here we are with a police force that will lie to incriminate people. They threaten us with prison if we lie. I don't think they make the country any safer, just more miserable and oppressive.
this aggravated me to no end. first they accost you as a pair, demand id when you refuse to fold to their demands, and they have the nerve to call a roadside interrogation a chat. the hypocrisy and double think is off the scale. and as you're already aware, ALL data is kept and archived regardless, that pamphlet was a waste of paper to push the copaganda.
@tirokopita No, in fact we don't have an id card of any description. Yes we might have a driving licence, passport etc, but for example when driving, we don't have to carry a driving licence. Obviously if stopped, we give details, and produce the licence at a later date, but no id required in the UK.
@tirokopita no, to the dismay of the police. that said, they routinely fabricate reasons to surrender correct personal information and actually get it to stick in courts that it was obstruction not to provide id sans suspected of a crime. UK law enforcement is a tasteless joke, ergo there is no law, only the man with the biggest stick. funny, you'd think with all the video evidence of police criminality it would slow them down, but given they're never held to account barring a massive public backlash, they carry on unhindered.
Criminal elements are part of the technical development and research of this kind of technology. They make so much money that they can create legitimate companies and sell the tech to governments. Deep trouble I'm afraid.
Once you let this proverbial "cat out of the bag" our rights of free movement has gone, and yes the government and their little crony gang will abuse it.
@@ImBaudits I watch that video by AB and I don't remember anything about that but maybe I missed it. So when they are wearing sunglasses the police have to ask them to take it off to recognize them.
@ might not have been him tbf, seen a few videos about facial recently Wouldn’t say they “have to” but they definitely will attempt to force people to put their face on it coz they’ll view it as “suspicious” Luckily suspicious isn’t a crime which criminals will know… but most normal people won’t and may be threatened into doing it In the wales trials, the home office pointed out various abuses of the system and the public 🙄
That's an easy one to answer. It will come down to that is their religion which is a protected characteristic. That's not to say it's illegal or wrong for anyone to wear a mask though.
Kent police a few years ago got in trouble for falsely arresting people for the sole purpose of fingerprinting them just for the data base then de arresting them. They were ordered to destroy those prints, we can only assume they did......
There is no longer such a thing as 'too much data.' All data is kept live, stored, and searched through millions of times, and this will continue into the foreseeable future.
These facial recognition cameras have been known to pick out entirely innocent people. They have been cuffed, and then had to show ID as proof that they are not the person the camera says they are? What is the point of only having freedom when the police say so?
So we allow people to walk through our immigration process with no ID, but we then want to film and retain info on everyone born here or in the country legally. Talk about having your priorities all wrong.
This is papers please.....on the sly!!!.....they are building/ built a data base.....papers please is old hat!....this is a power grab from humanity to digital by the devil!!!...
7:00 Caught lying as per usual. Isn't it amazing how they always come up trying to incriminate the public and end up being exposed breaking the law themselves? Great audit. Just subscribed.
it wil not be called "abuse" when it is fully functioning. this is a standard way of slowly getting people used to losing their rights. like steping slowly into a hot bath, eventually you will be submerged
Exactly! It won’t be long before the streets are littered with facial recognition cameras that are linked to other databases (passports, driving licences etc.) and they will track all our movements and retain the data, just like they already do with vehicles, using ANPR cameras.
oh they KNOW, but they refuse to admit it. plausible deniability. that is one reason they NEVER witness a fellow officer breaking the law...even if they are standing directly in front og the infraction.
Interesting how they become paranoid when you film them from outside a police station and start crying about private car numbers and suspicious activity yet when they come out into public and record our images for their files, we're being suspicious when we don't want to be filmed.
Seeming as people are committing the worse possible crime when know to the police and the authority. Yet an innocent man creating his own privacy get a street interview
AA could have walked on and ignored them, he chose not to get this footage, to others --- you don't want to stop and engage? Don't...... There's nothing they can legally do.
You aren't the only one as soon as I saw how these work I bought a snood, ski mask and cap to beat this. Not because I am wanted but because it's a step too far in this country.
I got stopped & searched in Chelmsford when I walked past 1 of these. I saw him stalking me so started recording when an undercover jumped out & grabbed me while another 2 uniform cops searched me. 😡😡 Great vid mate ✌️✌️🫡👍
The Police nowadays would rather hang around a camera van in a High Street and intimidate innocent law abiding people rather than patrol dangerous crime ridden areas or investigate reported crimes. Pathetic !
Can we see your face? No you can't tell me how to dress. Of course this is a government over reach. He's recording you without telling you. His policy says different . Yet he has s problem with you covering your face. As if its illegal to protect your identity against this breach of our freedom.
Good to see a local(ish) auditor improving with every video ,this was superb and educational and caught them lying again but that's hardly a first, top stuff.
"We've stopped to talk with you because you're out of the norm... so it you'd like to explain yourself." 19 words that should scare the sh!t out of everyone. Welcome to "the ends justify the means" rationale... The camera scans AND CAPTURES the faces and compares them againat a database. That means they are, in fact, recording images. The fact that they are subsequently deleted, regardless of the time interval between capture and deletion, does not mean they weren't recorded, just that they weren't retained for a lengthy period of time. It would not take much to simply "forget" to take the last step of deleting the images. Nor will it be long before we see abuses of the "wanted" status for this technology as we have seen in the Licence Plate Reader technology.
Right to a private life is all they need to know. And although they say the FR scan only picks up wanted people, there are multiple cameras on the van, one of which is recording CCTV while another live scans from the same CCTV image. They have the ability to record everyone who walks in front of their cameras and can try to identify any of them at a later date.
@@matthewturner6342imo it’s less about vocabulary and more about the ideas and purpose where some of the auditors really show lack of independent thought. Not to go into the auditors I can’t stand but I think Yardley Ski is brilliant. Impressed with this guy too. Not so much with the auditors that tend to focus on stirring up racial tension (of which there are many it seems)
That was a very informative video, AA. I agree the authorities cannot be trusted with this technology and fear these facial recognition vans are merely a ploy to desensitise the public to their use. Give it ten years or less and these cameras will be permanently deployed on every road junction in every town and city in Britain. Lol, you said you had a Wayne Couzens mask, and I should have been prepared, but the moment I saw it I burst out laughing. 👍
You get one of these and scan it with your phone, it gives you the information on there website and then what does it do to your phone and all the information on your phone.
They were lying about you only showing up only if the police wanted you. If you'd been reported as a missing person you'd show up too. Also quite naughty that they stopped you and questioned you in the first place. Because they were intimidating you to show your face in future. They should have fully respected your right to cover your face, and allowed you to go about your day with no interference whatsoever.
Even if you cover your face the technology is getting that advanced, if you are a person of interest that's being monitored, it can actually recognise your gait and your physical dimensions. It's getting very deep
3:43 here they go with their propaganda (nice choice of wording so I thought I’d use it) this won’t recognise you unless your wanted and we delete all other faces immediately 😂😂😂😂 What a load of bollox !!!!!
Maybe someone could commercially produce Wayne Couzens masks that everyone could wear when the facial recognition vans are around. That would just be hilarious
Arguing that you don't care about privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say.
I think it’s interesting that the constables think that they would be kept informed of any unadvertised activities that that equipment is performing, constable on the street are quite a bit down the food chain to be part of an inner circle of informed individuals.
It's ironic that while the police are using facial recognition to record everyone, supposedly under strict rules, the officer in the video didn’t follow basic body-worn camera guidelines for turning on his own body-worn camera, breaching police regulations and transparency principles under the Data Protection Act. If the police can’t get simple rules right that have been around for years, how can we trust them to handle new facial recognition tech responsibly? From watching this video, the auditor may have had his face covered, raising police suspicions, but the officer’s casual chewing didn’t exactly convey professionalism. I can’t think of any other job where it’s acceptable to chew gum while speaking to another person.
The nonsense about knife and machete attacks is ridiculous - they already know the thugs that carry knives, so why do they think that grabbibg facial details from Brenda who is off to the butchers is going to do anything about knife crime? These knife carrying individuals don't care, most of them will already have a long record of crime.
“I don’t want my face in there, it’s a government overreach”
“Oh… can I take your details?”
Absolutely stupid 😂😂
morons reading a script mate, I had an ex-cop (he's now a support worker for my partner who's dealing with a serious crime) and I mentioned how so many people quote policies as doctrine and just read a script...he told me how he was in 999 call centre and his mate was taking a call for someone to "come sort her daughter out", she was basically just having a tantrum..he went off script and told her this isn't a 999 situation and to not call again unless its an emergency...he got the sack...for using his brain.
Big up Baudits 👍
Facial technology is to make us safer , yea right .
@@temparalflux914 crazy mate, they’re mad with the stuff they get away with - literally breaking the law in a lot of cases - and then punished for actually helping people 🙄
@@ThatsDebatable101 ❤️❤️
Vans like that don't belong in a free country, time to mask up folks
it doesnt need your face just your eyes
China, Cuba , Peckham 🙆♀️🙆♀️🙆♀️🆘🆘🆘
@@joebloggs-xp7ubyou are correct you have to really cover up and even then it may not be enough due to gait.
They could have introduced this during Covid everyone was going to mask up like you said
You don't see it in Portsmouth
literally cant walk down a fucking street without them harassing you for private information , this is insane it has to stop NOW i dont believe a fucking word they say !
Rice VS Connolly 1966
Well said .
Police State UK is getting closer day by day. 😢
Every premise they provided to demand to see his details/face are all perfectly legal, i.e., it is legal to wear a hat in public, it is legal to wear sunglasses in public, it is legal to wear a face mask in public (at one point it was illegal not too).
They are demanding to see his face/id because he is doing what is lawful.
Has been a police state for a long time want support and freedom come in a 🚢
It's here already
@@m4rt1n0nY0utub3 It was never illegal not to wear a mask, these are the rights that most auditors ignored, It's bizarre, it's almost like they are hired by the controllers to make us lose faith in the police and public servants, ready for a-g-e-n-d-a-2030
Rice VS Connolly 1966 - The UK is a police state, not close, it is!
When someone from the government tells you its ok you know its not ok !
The most frightening words ... "We're from the Government and we're here to help."
Social Credit System - China
If they can’t even stick to their own policy of telling the public they’re recording them with body worn cameras or facial recognition, what makes you think they will stick to their own data collection policies regarding facial recognition.!?
They already illegally abuse the PNC data base to get unauthorised information on people for their own ends.
He says the system is used for: _"People that we're looking for, that have been put into the system, specific people . . . if they came down this area [sic] they could identify them, and we'd go talk to them."_ The fact that 2 officers approached Absolute Audits, questioned him, asked for his details (etc) proves this is bullshit, he wasn't one of these specific people, he wasn't in their system, yet he still got stopped and questioned. Like every other police power this will be abused, misused and expanded way beyond its original scope.
@@davelordy And the bloke in the charity shop.
Social Credit System - China
@@davelordy 100% and this year the 'Government' are again looking to give the police even more powers and the police are looking for this 'because' they haven't enough? Yup you can get more, but show us you don't already abuse the ones you have (That's almost impossible thanks to RUclips)
That's what police do when they are bored, harassing people, what a joke, the system is a joke
Yep, harass, hand-cuff, humiliate, and boss people around. Revolting. I feel unsafe whenever I see these dangerous people out in public.
@DaveThompsonfairlife4all it's ridiculous yeah if you can't trust the police, that's it then
@@SofianeHaciane Yep again. They are supposed to be the most trustworthy of all, yet here we are with a police force that will lie to incriminate people. They threaten us with prison if we lie. I don't think they make the country any safer, just more miserable and oppressive.
@@DaveThompsonfairlife4all not people 'thugs'
Why don't these police go and do something useful. They are the thin edge of the totalitarian wedge.
The officer chewing/eating while engaging with a member of the public needs disciplining or re-training.
Do they question the Muslim women to take their mask off?
of course not...
I might have to start wearing a Hijab and identify as a Muslim lady
Of course not Arab-Muslim-Saudi = Oil = Money 💵 just follow the money always and NEVER EVER EVER trust the police !! They’re not your friends!
this aggravated me to no end.
first they accost you as a pair, demand id when you refuse to fold to their demands, and they have the nerve to call a roadside interrogation a chat.
the hypocrisy and double think is off the scale.
and as you're already aware, ALL data is kept and archived regardless, that pamphlet was a waste of paper to push the copaganda.
Do you have to carry ID in the UK?
@tirokopita No, in fact we don't have an id card of any description. Yes we might have a driving licence, passport etc, but for example when driving, we don't have to carry a driving licence. Obviously if stopped, we give details, and produce the licence at a later date, but no id required in the UK.
@tirokopita no, to the dismay of the police.
that said, they routinely fabricate reasons to surrender correct personal information and actually get it to stick in courts that it was obstruction not to provide id sans suspected of a crime.
UK law enforcement is a tasteless joke, ergo there is no law, only the man with the biggest stick.
funny, you'd think with all the video evidence of police criminality it would slow them down, but given they're never held to account barring a massive public backlash, they carry on unhindered.
Why are Data Centre's popping up everywhere on industrial estates.....
@@tirokopita Nope, despite polices opinion (and now Governments opinion) that we should
DISGUSTING !!!! Well done AA.
Social Credit System - China
Welcome to the New North Korea, formally known as England
Wrong country, China would be correct since they use it actively there not just for criminals.
Facial recognition MUST be stopped. We all know it will be abused when it suits them and the truth will never be fully transparent.
So, in cases of the apprehension of rapists and murderers you'd disapprove of this technology?
Criminal elements are part of the technical development and research of this kind of
technology. They make so much money that they can create legitimate companies and sell the tech to governments. Deep trouble I'm afraid.
Rice VS Connolly 1966
Once you let this proverbial "cat out of the bag" our rights of free movement has gone, and yes the government and their little crony gang will abuse it.
@@jimbob356 you had an illusion of rights
Maybe you should Ask What did do if a muslim women totally covered going by do they ask her to remove her face covering?
It only needs the eyes so they’d be captured too without interference
Think that was on ABs video where he had some detailed chats with them
@@ImBaudits I watch that video by AB and I don't remember anything about that but maybe I missed it. So when they are wearing sunglasses the police have to ask them to take it off to recognize them.
@ might not have been him tbf, seen a few videos about facial recently
Wouldn’t say they “have to” but they definitely will attempt to force people to put their face on it coz they’ll view it as “suspicious”
Luckily suspicious isn’t a crime which criminals will know… but most normal people won’t and may be threatened into doing it
In the wales trials, the home office pointed out various abuses of the system and the public 🙄
@@ImBaudits I can't find tbf Can you give me the whole channel name
That's an easy one to answer. It will come down to that is their religion which is a protected characteristic. That's not to say it's illegal or wrong for anyone to wear a mask though.
It's an invasion of privacy and thank you for reporting and please keep up the good work reporting.
Whilst I disagree with these vans your comment is absurd.
No expectation of privacy in public.
Social Credit System - China
@@AndyPandy007 But you don't 'expect' to be identified by something like this in 'public'
They never delete anything never talk to them 😒
AB seen these vans, they said if your not wanted by police your image gets deleted. What a load of rubbish that is, we all know it's kept
They also mentioned on the AB Vid how much storage they have, said said oh but we don't store the footage.
@mattdoliver1984 sent to the cloud
Kent police a few years ago got in trouble for falsely arresting people for the sole purpose of fingerprinting them just for the data base then de arresting them.
They were ordered to destroy those prints, we can only assume they did......
trueeee, if i can get back my deleted stuff from years ago. surely they can get it back
There is no longer such a thing as 'too much data.' All data is kept live, stored, and searched through millions of times, and this will continue into the foreseeable future.
Your not a criminal until they decide you are one.
You're*
You're*
You are a criminal and you need to prove otherwise,
The police hate people that know there rights......
I don’t like police just walking in front of people, blocking their path, in order to “Force” a conversation onto someone.
Orwellian
Late 1930s germany
These facial recognition cameras have been known to pick out entirely innocent people. They have been cuffed, and then had to show ID as proof that they are not the person the camera says they are? What is the point of only having freedom when the police say so?
Guilty until proven innocent 😡
Yes, how often would a wanted criminal walk down the high street?
@@iandavies6575 Every day, (hopefully that's sarcasm)
The irony of being told to cover your face one minute. To uncover your face the next.
😂
One was for medical reasons so the virus could not spread, unless you think it was all a hoax. Weird comparison
That was part of the trial, to make people wear masks due to some bullshit covid, then see if their systems could recognise people through the mask.
“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety......" Ben Franklin
Minority report
So we allow people to walk through our immigration process with no ID, but we then want to film and retain info on everyone born here or in the country legally.
Talk about having your priorities all wrong.
Coppers the public DON'T trust you. With bloody good reason you should be charged with treason.
The pigs are allowed to lie to you, which means you can't trust them.
Having been through CONVID we should have all learnt lessons that we are NOT BEING TOLD TRUTH
This auditor is articulate and erudite to a high degree.
spot on - although I had to look up the word "erudite" 🙂
Well read. @@markosmith8037
@@markosmith8037 It’s a glue innit. Oh no, that’s Araldite. 😬
@@nocommentuk I honestly looked up the word "Araldite" the other day too, after hearing it in a Top Gear episode (Burma Special).
Focus Pocus is the king Makes everyone else look basic
Becoming a police state.
Soon be "your papers, please."
pretty itll be auto face recognition on their bodycams. if they havent got that already
This is papers please.....on the sly!!!.....they are building/ built a data base.....papers please is old hat!....this is a power grab from humanity to digital by the devil!!!...
7:00 Caught lying as per usual. Isn't it amazing how they always come up trying to incriminate the public and end up being exposed breaking the law themselves?
Great audit. Just subscribed.
Should have people standing either end of that street handing out cheap sunglasses and masks and everybody should put them on to walk past.
Even if it's not being abused now it will be later
it wil not be called "abuse" when it is fully functioning. this is a standard way of slowly getting people used to losing their rights. like steping slowly into a hot bath, eventually you will be submerged
@@dannygolightly865exactly 💯
Exactly! It won’t be long before the streets are littered with facial recognition cameras that are linked to other databases (passports, driving licences etc.) and they will track all our movements and retain the data, just like they already do with vehicles, using ANPR cameras.
Been abused for years
This is the thin end of a wedge. Never trust them.
They’ll never understand why anyone with any sense doesn’t trust em👎👎
oh they KNOW, but they refuse to admit it. plausible deniability. that is one reason they NEVER witness a fellow officer breaking the law...even if they are standing directly in front og the infraction.
This is a total infringement of our privacy and government overreach!
Interesting how they become paranoid when you film them from outside a police station and start crying about private car numbers and suspicious activity yet when they come out into public and record our images for their files, we're being suspicious when we don't want to be filmed.
So if Wayne Couzens breaks out of jail, the police cameras won't pick him up? Sounds about right.
Seeming as people are committing the worse possible crime when know to the police and the authority. Yet an innocent man creating his own privacy get a street interview
They are deleting feck all.....!
probably comparing images captured with passport and driving licence data bases compiling new databases
It’s called freedom to be anonymous, in a supposedly free country, its our right.
😂Two thick cops up against a beautifully put civil liberties argument - great work as always AA - you ran rings round them - thank you!
Like the chewing of the gum……..is that against their policy
That was very entertaining @AA. Well done.
I loved the Wayne Cousins idea.
Stay safe chap.
A short while back you could be nicked for not wearing a mask. Now look. Shameful.
Haha at the Wayne Couzens mask
This isn't about catching criminals ,this is all about data capture of every citizen in the UK apart from the dingy divers who won't have any ID.
They have no right to accost a member of the public going about their lawful business.
Burkas perfectly legal 🙈🧌🎬🆘
AA could have walked on and ignored them, he chose not to get this footage, to others --- you don't want to stop and engage? Don't...... There's nothing they can legally do.
@@ianhill4585 I bet if he ignored them they would have detained him.
@@adiohead More than possible. On the suspicion of being "suspicious". Yet another unlawful detainment.
@@ianhill4585 They did step in front of his path a few times so I'd bet money he'd have been grabbed.
You aren't the only one as soon as I saw how these work I bought a snood, ski mask and cap to beat this. Not because I am wanted but because it's a step too far in this country.
Facial recognition makes us safer , yea I beleve that .
This removes consent of identifying to police and is wrong, plus it’s not infallible and is extremely inaccurate with people of colour.
Dam now the cameras are racist. Bloody 🇬🇧 😂
It will be misused. As the police computers are
Great vid & balls of steel as always!
Yeah, he's doing good work.
So when are they going to ban muslim women from wearing face coverings?
How very Orwellian
I can hardly wait for the police to be told by they're bosses WE don't need to employ you because use facial recognition now.
I got stopped & searched in Chelmsford when I walked past 1 of these. I saw him stalking me so started recording when an undercover jumped out & grabbed me while another 2 uniform cops searched me. 😡😡 Great vid mate ✌️✌️🫡👍
copper u should not be chewing gum what a disgrace
Unprofessional
Is it not enough that we are the most watched nation in the world?
They had me at "puts it into the system" big brother.
The more this is exposed the more people will cover their faces!
All the crime in the country and these two idiots approached a law abiding citizen
The Police nowadays would rather hang around a camera van in a High Street and intimidate innocent law abiding people rather than patrol dangerous crime ridden areas or investigate reported crimes. Pathetic !
Can we see your face?
No you can't tell me how to dress.
Of course this is a government over reach.
He's recording you without telling you. His policy says different . Yet he has s problem with you covering your face. As if its illegal to protect your identity against this breach of our freedom.
Good to see a local(ish) auditor improving with every video ,this was superb and educational and caught them lying again but that's hardly a first, top stuff.
'We're just having a conversation.'
Translation: ' You've exposed my bullshit so now I'm trying to worm myself out of it with even more bullshit.'
"I'm talking to myself". Police: "That's fine". Oh how nice to be allowed to talk to oneself. I feel so liberated.
It’s data collecting thats going on.
Probably collecting and using it to train the AI systems.
@@adiohead It’s AI they’re using to collect ur face details and log it. They don’t delete nothing. It’s collecting.
@@richardwalker5721equally every pcr test taken or submitted,your DNA was harvested and added to their data base!....allegedly
Wayne Couzens mask? Somehow, I don't think that would trigger their system alert.
😂😂😂😎😎😎
why dont they park it in the middle of the crime ridden estates
because they would have to do some work
Why don't they actually look for burglars and thieves?
They always have to have the last word.
"We've stopped to talk with you because you're out of the norm... so it you'd like to explain yourself." 19 words that should scare the sh!t out of everyone.
Welcome to "the ends justify the means" rationale...
The camera scans AND CAPTURES the faces and compares them againat a database. That means they are, in fact, recording images. The fact that they are subsequently deleted, regardless of the time interval between capture and deletion, does not mean they weren't recorded, just that they weren't retained for a lengthy period of time. It would not take much to simply "forget" to take the last step of deleting the images. Nor will it be long before we see abuses of the "wanted" status for this technology as we have seen in the Licence Plate Reader technology.
"ILLEGAL immigrants welcome" is what the stand should have said at the end
Wait for the 'Hits' to pour in for them when everyone who uses 'Social Media' is forced to upload a photo and ID info.....(Oh it's coming people!)
I liked you saying that you're not normal, neither am I, I'm not normal and wouldn't want to be. Normal is boring.
Right to a private life is all they need to know. And although they say the FR scan only picks up wanted people, there are multiple cameras on the van, one of which is recording CCTV while another live scans from the same CCTV image. They have the ability to record everyone who walks in front of their cameras and can try to identify any of them at a later date.
" People We put Into The System", whether you're wanted or not.
You were very articulate for an auditor. Good work!
For an auditor ? ? ? 🤪🤪🤪
“How tae Win friends and influence people” eh ? 🙄🙄🤡
😆🤣😁😂😆🤣😆
Do you think that most auditors are inarticulate then? That’s a bit unfair in my opinion.
@@Kittiesdawn I like AB; he's smart and very funny but occasionally let down by his vocab limitations. Some are super dumb.
@@matthewturner6342imo it’s less about vocabulary and more about the ideas and purpose where some of the auditors really show lack of independent thought. Not to go into the auditors I can’t stand but I think Yardley Ski is brilliant. Impressed with this guy too.
Not so much with the auditors that tend to focus on stirring up racial tension (of which there are many it seems)
That was a very informative video, AA. I agree the authorities cannot be trusted with this technology and fear these facial recognition vans are merely a ploy to desensitise the public to their use. Give it ten years or less and these cameras will be permanently deployed on every road junction in every town and city in Britain. Lol, you said you had a Wayne Couzens mask, and I should have been prepared, but the moment I saw it I burst out laughing. 👍
Interesting stuff.
Who knew that pigs chewed the cud before this video dropped?
That propaganda leaflet looks legit tho
I believe every word of it, it was approved by the government so it must be true
@ImBaudits Our government only wants the best for us 🤭
@@T1mPanda EXACTLY! You get it 🥰😍
🤮🤮🤮💩
You get one of these and scan it with your phone, it gives you the information on there website and then what does it do to your phone and all the information on your phone.
The nine scariest words in the English language,"i'm with the Government and i'm here to help".
BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING!!!! POLICE STATE UK - SUPERB INTERACTION THE PUBLIC DO NEED TO SEE THIS KIND OF INTERACTION! 41,000 VIEWS SO FAR!
They were lying about you only showing up only if the police wanted you. If you'd been reported as a missing person you'd show up too.
Also quite naughty that they stopped you and questioned you in the first place. Because they were intimidating you to show your face in future.
They should have fully respected your right to cover your face, and allowed you to go about your day with no interference whatsoever.
They all know their mate Wayne Couzens , don't make me laugh
The Starzy State is here to be seen 😂😂
Even if you cover your face the technology is getting that advanced, if you are a person of interest that's being monitored, it can actually recognise your gait and your physical dimensions.
It's getting very deep
3:43 here they go with their propaganda (nice choice of wording so I thought I’d use it) this won’t recognise you unless your wanted and we delete all other faces immediately 😂😂😂😂
What a load of bollox !!!!!
Power and control.
Maybe someone could commercially produce Wayne Couzens masks that everyone could wear when the facial recognition vans are around. That would just be hilarious
Debating the difference between the police and criminals is just semantics.
Arguing that you don't care about privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say.
Absolutely brilliant, well fone uou.
I think it’s interesting that the constables think that they would be kept informed of any unadvertised activities that that equipment is performing, constable on the street are quite a bit down the food chain to be part of an inner circle of informed individuals.
It's ironic that while the police are using facial recognition to record everyone, supposedly under strict rules, the officer in the video didn’t follow basic body-worn camera guidelines for turning on his own body-worn camera, breaching police regulations and transparency principles under the Data Protection Act. If the police can’t get simple rules right that have been around for years, how can we trust them to handle new facial recognition tech responsibly?
From watching this video, the auditor may have had his face covered, raising police suspicions, but the officer’s casual chewing didn’t exactly convey professionalism. I can’t think of any other job where it’s acceptable to chew gum while speaking to another person.
The nonsense about knife and machete attacks is ridiculous - they already know the thugs that carry knives, so why do they think that grabbibg facial details from Brenda who is off to the butchers is going to do anything about knife crime? These knife carrying individuals don't care, most of them will already have a long record of crime.
They dont follow body worn policy so why would you believe they follow policy on this over reach?
Nicely done 👍
The type of person who would do this job is void of any independent thought process
Haha. Love it.
My man
Goat!
Fishing... fishing... fishing! They think we're all so in awe of them that we'll spill our guts in an instant.
Corporate goons