DID Garrett Adelstein GET CHEATED for A $270,000 pot??!?!?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 сен 2022
- The craziest poker hand in History happens on Hustler Casino Live stream
On the date of September 30th 2022 I am not accusing anyone of cheating or breaking the law.
Did Garrett get cheated or did Robbi make the best call in poker history?
Jaka coaches her. Did he invent see thru glasses 👓?? 😂
NO.
She was just sick of his bluffing her and made a fish/donkey call that held up.
Nothing to see there.
The real story is KAREN ADELSTEINS entitlement getting checked.
best call? More like I don’t know
wtf I am doing call
SHE DID BEST CALL
She made the dumbest best call in poker history
Garrett looks around as if he's expecting Ashton Kutcher to spring out any second and shout "you've been punked!"
Would be a hilarious punk episode to set up a televised high stakes game where everyone is in on it accept the high stakes pro being pranked. All in for like a million dollar pot on a 885 board. Guy getting pranked has 88, other guy has AA and turn and river come AA.
hahahaah
And for now on when someone missreads a hand and loses, Garrett then gives that money back. Then this Garrett`s logic makes sense. There is no poker player who has never ever missred a hand, it has happened even to Ivey so this Garrett`s whining is totally unforgivable. His reputation goes down to toilet in one sigle hand.
lol, I thought the same thing
Great idea!
Pearson saying “Garrets a deep sea fisherman” after he got the money back is a hilarious comment i cant stop laughing 😂
Pearson was a crying little bitch couple weeks ago when he punted off $500K and stormed out sooooo consider the source
Time stamp?
Wtf does that even mean?
What does that mean?
@@youbluethatone1017 15:05
She didn't think she had a 3. She asked if 3s are good BEFORE calling to either stall or get a read or just mess with Garrett. After she called, and before she showed her hand, she CLEARLY said that she didn't have a pair of 3s
This was an obvious lie… so many things adding up to be 100% sketchy
In Rip’s defense, it’s really distressing when a con artist gets made.
And to lower yourself to misandrist comments to prove ur point is for losers. Her story changed several times, no person in their right mind gives 100k up when they didn’t cheat. Her story is weird. Personally I would never give the $ back out if principle if I didn’t cheat
@TRAVELER it’s called guy behind scenes looking at cards letting her know
Phil Ivey just sitting there thinking “ these amateur’s don’t even know how to angle”😂😂😂
It’s looks like you don’t know who Garrett is !! His the goat of high stakes poker!!
Phil was like keep your relationship at home.. daddy was pissed at mama.. mistress
@@michaelmunoz3978 the goat crying like that. No sir. No Goat asking for a rebate.
@@michaelmunoz3978 From now on he’s the pussy of high stakes poker😂😂
Phil is the greatest.
And there is no way she misread her hand. When she flipped the cards over she would've reacted that she didn't have a 3 if she thought she did. So her saying that in the interview is suspicious AF too
Ask the doctor u will find out lot of times brain can control your eyes when you under pressure or excite or anxious emotionally
@@pennytang3306 actually, in a really tense moment like that, your brain would respond with shock realizing that you didnt have the hand you thought. Also, she literally LOOKED at her hand for like 10 seconds before calling, so that makes 0 fucking sense
Her poker hand reading skills are about as real as her breasts.
Garrett got cheated 100%.
That happened to me lots of times misread my card even I checked my card multiple times. It’s mostly happened to a woman, guys never get it.
She made stupid call before the river, but she wasn’t cheating. If she lost , g will give her money back because she misread the hand?
She changed her story. First she said she was making a hero call, then she said she misread her hand. Then she gives the money back. Very suspicious
She wasn’t even a favorite so why would she cheat this hand ?
She changed her story 5x
Cheating makes no sense here, and having j3 there would be a sick hero call
@@knorre111 I agree it would be. But she knew she didn’t have a 3. She said so herself right before and after she called. Someone asked her if she had a 3 and she said no. Then Garrett asked her if she had a small pair and she said “you give me so much credit?”.
She didn’t misread her hand. That’s just one of the many stories she came up with afterwards to justify the egregious (or illegal) call.
YEA MAN SHE CHANGED HER STORY ! SHE CHANGED HER STORY !! LMAO !! THAT MEANS SHES A FKIN CHEAT !!! ONLY CHEATS CHANGE THEIR STORIES ! SHES A CHEAT !! SHE CHANGED HER STORY !! LMFAO !!! CHANGED HER STORY !! THAT MEANS SHES A FKIN CHEAT !! LMAO
Lex, Thank you! I REALLY appreciate you showing the clips in full and not pausing and interrupting every few moments and just allowing us to watch the hand and then give your recap and thoughts! I cannot stand reaction videos that don't let the thing they are reacting to play and stop it and chime in every 30 seconds. It's so hard to get an understanding of what happens when anyone does this.
This was cool. Nice video!
I think the weirdest part was her reaction to winning. Imagine calling a 109k allin on the turn running it twice and winning both with Jack high. Wouldn't most people be celebrating a little after bricking in your mind only to see J High is good? She seemed to know she was good before the cards were turned over and her only worry was to make sure Garrett was OK. Also odd she misspeaks and says Jacob instead of Garrett. She had a lot of wordsalad that came across very nervous. Obviously no proof right now just very weird.
Great observations. This is what I wrote, wondering if you might agree "She kept checking her hole cards before she called, so hard to understand how she could think she had bottom pair. The J high call would almost certainly have to be cheating. You got to wonder if she really is that out of it. Doug Polk said she seems to be lol. But she has played a lot the last 10 years, and the fact that she gave her hole cards a good look over before she called, how could she think she had bottom pair? Then she said she called with J high cause the though he had A high. She is either the most unqualified person on earth to play poker, totally spaced out, or cheating lol. Who knows, I was certain she cheated, but it's just so strange, and people can act so unpredictable when questioned and accused, not really sure what to think anymore, but very very very suspicious, and should be looked into, perhaps the FBI should interview her."
Too much plastic surgery. She can't make excited facial emotions.
She knew she embarrassed her sugar daddy in front of millions and made him look like a girl.. she knew he's dumping her... They are f. Buddies
@@nsant yep she’s gonna look like an orc in about 20 years
@Jay Baker that's why I thought it was weird his name was in her head
I love Andy man. “ If she didn’t cheat, why would you give home the money back”? We’re all still waiting for that real answer…
Actually it was the guy next to Andy. The one who also said "I don't see how you could've cheated."
Wasnt her money and they thretend her.
There you go
You clearly never saw Garrett crying and begging for his money with those pityful dogeyes. He does that all the time to get his money back.
@@notro7672 You're being sarcastic but that's actually the case. When she sais "I put you on Ace high", the way Garrett answers "Why did you call with Jack high then?" obviously implies she made a mistake. In her mind he's talking about the small bet on the flop, that's when she calls with Jack high. Now he gets even more aggravated, understandably so because what she sais doesn't make sense to anyone who looked at the cards. He asks "So you called all-in on the turn because....?", and she is upset with this question because she just explained it to him, she hit a bottom pair on the turn so why not call against Ace high? Now clearly upset she responds "yeah... because you didn't have sht", as in "it was a perfect read, why do you look like you saw a ghost and why are you complaining and asking the same question twice".
I cannot blame Garrett at all for responding this way to a Jack high 3-bet all-in call especially considering the conversation. But playing the hand back and just imagining her hand is J3, which she had the previous hand, it all adds up. Now it's a giant misunderstanding, credit to the commentators for already guessing she misread it, don't blame them for thinking it's impossible because she stares at those cards but from what she sais and the decisions she makes it's clear.
The thing that really set up this disaster is the table talk I think. They say "that was sick!" when the cards are revealed. Everyone is so speechless, that nobody repeats exactly what happened. Everyone is talking about the action, nobody points out directly how she won with Jack high because everyone seems to have to digest that. The reaction of the table is one of the most confusing reactions ever in itself. She's pumped with adrenaline just won a big hand expecting everyone to cheer for her, I'm wondering if she only realized what hse had done when Garrett tried to figure out wtf happened or if she realized earlier already and was embarassed so she kept it to herself.
Instead of Survivor, Garret should on Naked and Afraid 😱
Since when in poker do we care WHY someone called, bet or folded. She won, whether Garrett understands why she called or not.
The guy shoved all in on a draw holding 8 high. You can't expect to win with that play and you can't be angry when you get called. What a big baby.
He had straight flush draw with lots of out. Regardless of what he had there is no way you van call all in for over $100k with J4.
She literally changed the story about the money conversation THREE TIMES
So.
On top of that she gives a long, rambling-ish interview that includes the kicker line "I don't like drama." OMG. Long live the Queen!
@@measlymitch778 stop being a fucking feminist for a sec..bitch
@@measlymitch778 Clearly proves that she has no idea wft she's doing. Pure Donkey
@TRAVELER Giving the money back was an admission of guilt. She was spooked that the matter would be looked into more closely, and thought well, if I give it back maybe they'll drop it. She doesn't have the presence of mind to deal with the situation any other way.
She rechecked her hand 2x after he put her all in, she 100% knew she didn't have a 3
Yep, I saw that
She also knew his hand she saw his cards when he picked them up he leaks out the back end.
Wtf you are right !! I just went back and saw it, also did you notice she seemed odd like in a weird state of silent mind like she had a listening device ? Or maybe Lauren the dealer and her know each other and colluded
That is just an act you do to make villain confused. I do that sometimes myself, and I can assure you i do NOT see the cards, but I literally eat all the information I can on my opponents reaction to my "2nd look on cards". ;)
@@raydalton1110 She does not need the dealer from where she is sitting. If he does not go all in if he misses she jams and does not have to show down. But why run it twice.
So glad I saw this live this was amazing
If you forget the actual cards for a minute it becomes obvious she cheated. She couldn't STOP smiling during the entire decision period of whether to call. She did KNOW she had a hand that should never call but she KEPT GETTING THE SIGNAL she was a winner. She was EMBARRASSED about calling (yet she knew she won). She couldn't figure out HOW TO ACT in the act of calling. She did it and had a big smile on her face -- it was a smile of embarrassment more than anything else.
Ridiculous. People don’t understand the pressure of playing on stream under the lights, against (the then) a star with a billboard of his face at the casino. It’s extremely intense.
She misread her hand, didn’t want to admit it, and then was forced to admit it because cry baby Adelstein made all these ridiculous accusations. You play with fish and they make fish moves. Then you cry about it and claim cheating? Garrett finally got exposed for who he really is.
@@johnlanton9363 Ridiculous.
Your comment is what I would call "ridiculous." I don't even like Garret but that hand is super suspicious and she switched her story so many times that I don't believe her. Remember when she said that she thought that he had ace high and he asked her then why did you call with a jack? I think that she was embarrassed to call even though she KNEW that she had A winner. @@johnlanton9363
@@johnlanton9363 how the hell do u forget whats in ur hand LMAO... smh i have watched it multiple times before... aint no way any PERSON let alone a poker player is calling anything.. she said she put him on ACES!!! if thats the case y not fold. na something was def going on u dont call that every unless ur gettin info from somewhere else.
I like the point you made at the end where she only came back with an explanation after being accused of cheating
Even if she misread her hand or not, she had no idea what the river cards are gonna be. If they split or she lost....we would not be accusing her of cheating
Someone else in the comments said this already and I had the same thought, but if you’re cheating, would you really call in a spot where it’s basically a coin flip? I think that makes even less sense than calling with jack-high without any cheating whatsoever.
@christian is this comment for realy. With the money thats already involved she get the right odds to call the jamm. there on the river
I’m not saying anything about pot odds - rather she can’t make that call while cheating without the thought of serious repercussions. It just doesn’t make sense to cheat in that spot.
@@chrisb.7835 really? Someone shoves on you with no pair or overs and you think that doesn’t call for cheating?
Exactly she was actually behind! Also cheating is hard to pull off so unless its clear that cheating is happening the assumption is always that there is no cheating. There are 10 cameras on all of them I'm sure if cheating was happening they can pick up on it..
He had 19 outs on the river and running it twice. If she knew his cards she would never have taken that risk.
By the way, love your videos. Can't wait to watch when the new ones are posted. Keep it up, you're a class act.
In her interview after she said she misread and though she had a pair of 3s, that she didn't recheck her hand. Not only did she recheck her hand after Garrett shoved, when she called, someone asked if she had 3s and she said no she just thought garrett didnt have anything. She's clearly lying, which means she's covering something up.
Robbi has her cards peeled from 2:42-2:54. How in the world could she possibly think she had a 3? She stared at her cards for over 10 seconds.
She was table talking... asked him he could beat a 3 cuz she didnt have one even less of a hand than that. She did not cheat it was an epic move
2:42 she checked her hand
4:30 Andy and the people at the table ask her do she have a 3 and she said no.
LMFAO! @ 3:20 Robbi said' 3's no good?' She thought she had pair of 3s. Go and watch the whole video, earlier she played with J-8 suited vs. Garrett Q-4 offsuit.
@@solosensei8188 they asked pocket 3s , big difference, use your ears
@@jk8176 they asked pocket 3 then asked a 3. She said no no. How good is your ear? Lol
I have never seen so much emotion in a poker hand. I can feel the emotions!!
She seems a little green and unorthodox when it comes to poker etiquette but also 99% honest and 1% bashful at this point.
Garrett before the last river was shown “what a sick call 😅”
No sir, that was one of the sickest calls…
of all-time
Garrett clearly has never seen rampage play if he thinks that sort of call never happens
Nah dude come on something isn’t right in this hand we all know it
Haha love it.
I agree with you. Rampage is one of the worst poker player I've seen play on tv.
Hahaha after all the drama this gave me a good laugh ty 😆
@@TrollingCoyote she said she had 3 a bluff catcher.
“Garrett is is a deep sea fisherman. How did he dothat?” Eric Persons is great
legendary comment
Interesting how Rip went silent during the next hand while she "explains" her bullchit
Great video man. Best one I've seen on this whole ordeal
I agree with everything you said on your take with this....The question I am left with, is HOW could she possibly have cheated. When she confidently says this is purely a bluff catcher, that means she thought he was bluffing with two cards 87 or less and excluding the 3. Even if she knew his hand, they ran it two times, there is no way she could have known what the two rivers would be.
Her excuse/reasons were as fake as her......well you know
She loses to a lot of bluffs like QJ or ace high.
Bullshit bluff catcher with a J makes no sense, cheating definitely
She tired of getting buff all the time. Thought she had a 3. Was embarrassed to admit at first.
Because she knew one thing from the buzzer. That she had the best hand at that point in the hand.
Best part is Ivey just quietly watching children being children.
Real men only cheat the casinos. Though he was forced to give it all back.
@@cclouse14 if you dont think ivey cheated on fulltilt.
Lmao
He said " white people'
Ivey would've lost his mind and snap accused her of cheating if he was the one with the 98cc.
@@Etc...Sports_games 😂wtf
I’m addicted to seeing to seeing Garrets face drop when he sees her hand
If you were cheated wouldn’t you give that look?
The pain!
Yep, 100%. AFter you rewatch it a few times, you find that her story crumbes too.
SHe says she thought that Garrett only had Ace high, and says her J of cubs provided blockers.
SO why would you call an all in when you're quite far behind against ace high?
Her hand, in of itself at this point only really has good value if Garrett has 3-5 unsuited. SO really, at best she is hoping for a very marginal spot. At worst she's already drawing dead.
SHe cheated. And you can see Garrett's eyes narrow immediately afterwards. Normally he would just say, "good hand" etc, but he knows, and his mind is working
Her inconcistent stories are what making people think that something is definitely off. If she stuck with "i really thought my j high was good" then this is already over with and the story would be Garrett getting soul crushed by a rec.
Thats my tought. If you are cheatting you dont do any of this....because if she Is(I dont think so) just blown it didnt she?
I think the issue is all the emotions and drama surrounding it. Her first excuse wasn't accept well enough, so she embellished the story further. Don't see anything nefarious here, unless poker stupidity is nefarious.
The issue is her conflicting stories. If she straight up says she misread her hand from the get go, then easy and done with. But she tried to save face by insinuating she made an insane hero call with J high. Her giving the money back makes me believe her less
If she has the ability to cheat there are so many better spots.
Come on how can she cheat she was 47% againtst 53% for garett . cheating would be stupid because you have more chances to lose all your money . For me this is the craziest read i have ever seen a legendary hand from The girl .
No the issue is Garrett acting like a child after losing 100k with an 800k stack. Then having the nerve to take the money back and tell her she was 5k short.
Even if Garrett has nothing on the board, he can still have QJcc, AXcc, and other combinations of hands that would beat her. It’s just not adding up to me. If you think calling with J high there is reasonable in anyway or think that constitutes a hero call, you’re welcome to any house game I play at. She pretty much had to know he didn’t at least have another J or better…otherwise you’re risking $100k to chop?? Cmon now
yeah 100% changed her story, she tried to be a hero at first, then decided shed rather just have the dumb luck
I don't gamble. I don't play poker. I'm watching every stream about this. It's fascinating.
The biggest thing my argument would be (if she’s claiming she thinks she had a 3) is that she is looking at her hand and rechecking it over and over. She knows what she had, and there’s something fishy about her first remark.
I think that people have a tendency to not admit mistakes right up front and I think she obviously made one but benefited at the end
In addition to her saying she misread her hand an hour after, during the table talk when garrett said “unless you have 5s” and she said “you give me this much credit” she clearly had to know she did not have a pair. Very strange
Couldn’t she have meant she had a lower pair like 3’s? Because those are worse than 5’s?
@@mikefetters6674 I think on any other board, yes. But in this space I’d put a pair of 3s and 5s in the same class of hands credit wise.
Not strange. There is no excuses for Garrett. He was slapped around like bitch
She didn't have a pair because it got counterfeit in the river. Still rooting for G-Man though
she knew Gman cards for sure. that's why she called it. I don't know what trick. but I would call if I know Gman cards
In a way, I admire his nerve. Maybe anyone who can accuse her of cheating and ask for his money back deserves it. I never would have.
In 20 years of poker this is the most insane hand I have ever seen.. especially for a 150k bet 😂😂😂
Go watch Titan... TOM Dawn 7-2 vs. Asian dude 8-4...something like that. The asian dude re-raised TOM on the turn...making TOM Dawn FOLD. Both have nothing with the board. Asian player win with 8 high! ..l$500K+++ raised. On nothing.... HUGE pot... win with 8 High..not Jack high...
@@edwardlopez1176 i don’t think you get it…i saw that hand on Triton but this is a complete different thing
@@edwardlopez1176 people bluff all the time nobody calls a $109000 all in with J high big difference.
@UCYIThaUVu7FIol-UaB-Iz4A this is different. She called the all in… she wasn’t bluffing.
@@edwardlopez1176 Bluffing with 8 high is one thing. Calling an all in for $150K is a totally different thing.
Garrett was embarrassed because it happened in front of Phil Ivey who is his idol
There was COLLUSION at that table last night lol
I've never seen her play a single hand. But this looked EXACTLY like Potripper.
Her answers and giving it back make everything look even more suspicious
Even if she originally misread her hand, after Garrett went all in, she looked at her hole cards for a good 10 seconds. How do you stare at a 4 for over 10 seconds and think it's a 3!
Agreed 100% she checked her cards before calling and she even said she didn't have 3 before opening her cards. I believe she cheated.
Watching his eyes get big and he looks directly over at the table at Andy and another player he trusts and who helps run games let’s you know exactly how shocked he was and he immediately thought something was up.
Reminds me of a hand I played with a solid player in 2/5 like 10 years ago. When I bluff-jammed 800 all in on the river and I was called by J high . The sick part was I was bluffing with the best hand and insta mucked my ace high. He said he had me on a lower str8 draw. I learned a valuable lesson not to ever muck my hand again
people also try the shady "I have 2 pair" when one of the pair is on the board and their other pair is shit just to get you to fold a better pair.
That’s your problem you should’ve been smart enough too bad you are good thing that the money went the other way paid his bills are not yours he deserved it
Did floor checked the cameras?
@@userac-xpg All the old people always say that shit dead serious "i have two pair" when board is paired its so annoying
@@userac-xpg this happened to me and worse than mucking my winning hand was that it out me on foot losing the rest of my profits
U know it’s serious when every poker RUclipsr makes a video regarding this issue😳
Hustler Casino should have immediately gone to the booth where the one person who can see the cards live was working and secure the area. This was potentially a 125k attempted theft. HCL dropped the ball.
Every last bit of my ability to analyze human behavior is telling me ONE THING. Every bit of my faith in the human race is telling me to believe another.
Personally I think her behaviour is very suspicious. As you said this isnt a big pot to Garrett. He didn’t even lose a quarter of his stack. He has been a consummate professional when previously lost big pots and been slow rolled. Would 100 percent believe his version of events. Also if you check the footage she re checked her hand before she called. No way you misread your hand pre flop then check and misread again and make that hero call especially in a game 10x what you normally play.
She misread her hand, Garrett lost it fair and square. She shouldn't have given the money back. I've misread hands before, but for 200 dollars pot not 120,000.00. Crazy money! Good video Lex!
How did she misread her hand? She stared at her hand for a solid 10 seconds before she called. It’s also fucking odd that when she flipped over her hand she had 0 reaction.
She stated during the hand she didn't have a 3 and that it was a "pure bluff catcher." She then changed her story. Nice try.
The using of the time chips is what really is giving the "maybe she had a friend watching the stream and to text when she is in hands and has the best or is winning" type scenario. Combine that with literally the only hand she could put Garrett on that she is beating, is exactly 78 off clubs, but the fact that she herself, NEVER utters that or begins to say something like yeah i thought that is what you had, thats what I put you on etc she kinda just mutters about the blockers and the odd Ace high, which beats her read, and other nonsense as she didn't have time to justify her call without giving away dead that she had some extra inside info. This is like a murder case where if you look at all the pieces individually, its not really suspicious or proof of guilt. But when you add all of them up and look at the big picture, it just does not make sense that she would make this call without knowing exactly what garrett was holding or be smart enough to defend your action by declaring the hand you think Garrett has. If you are that good at soul reading, why not proudly when J4 wins the hand say, yeah that is what I put you on rather than sit there looking like someone who didn't think far enough ahead to how you would answer the questions of why you called an all in for piles with Jack high and no draw. Any winning poker player knows something was up this hand and the likely scenario was her getting some kind of alert that her hand was ahead when Garrett shoved all in on the turn. Easy to program your phone to vibrate in a certain pattern when a certain person IE the person watching the live stream, sends a text message when you are facing a big bet or all in call. You would be naïve to think some of the degenerates who play poker at 2/5 won't cheat to get an edge, let alone the people playing for hundreds of thousands and with this sort of technology, its not the most difficult to cheat. Garrett had a right to think something was off.
No cell phones are allowed and they go through security and all to make sure they don’t have a cell phone.
Even if she knew what he had, it would still be hard to call with her specific hand if she thought she had a 3 and she put him on A high?? But if she knew what he had I think she folds, he had a lot of outs a lot!!!
If Robbi was getting a signal on a spy device it would have to be an inside job bc of the broadcast delay. Seams like a “Mission Impossible” effort. Especially when she just gives the money back at the end.
They should have checked her for any devices right there on the spot. Although it’s wrong it sure would’ve ended all of the cheating accusations
There is much more to this than meets the eye. I can't wait to see what "revelations" come out on Friday as promised by Nick (though he said they would not come from him/HCL), and how the whole thing shakes out.
1. It would be the most stupid spot ever, to try to cheat. Too obvious, and too lacking an edge. Garrett had an open ended straight flush draw plus two live cards. It was a coin flip. You don't cheat to "get the money in ahead" when your opponent has 21 outs (or even 19 with 2 of them in her hand).
2. If she knew the river card, or just knew "Texas style" who was going to win from the shuffler, she sure wouldn't have asked to run it twice. Are people REALLY accusing her of knowing her hand would win BOTH rivers? Would she want to DOUBLE the chance of the dealer screwing up a burn card or something? No way.
3. If she knew the river card or who was going to win a runout, then both the casino and the production team are at fault for dealing a crooked/insecure game.
4. The hand prior to this, she had J3, this hand she had J4. Have you ever remembered your cards from the previous hand instead of the current hand? I have. I bet every street thinking I had TPTK, when all I really had was the nut nothing. It was at limit holdem, where firing every barrel isn't always effective!
5. When she "was looking at her cards for 15 seconds" they didn't seem to be separated much, or raised much from the table. It's entirely possible that she just likes holding her cards that way, or was just staring at the Jack of Clubs, rather than checking that her kicker really was a 3. The brain also tends to see what it's expecting to see.
6. When she was talking after the turn card, while considering calling the shove, it really seemed like she thought she had a 3 which the turn paired, or was at least representing that she had a 3. The paired 3 fits the desciption of a pretty bad hand, but still a bluff catcher. Jack high, much less so.
7. When the first river card counterfeited the paired 3, her talking implied that she'd been counterfeited, or at least wasn't very hopeful about her chances. We all know the feeling of going from being ahead of an ace, to being behind an ace. Or in this case, suddenly behind an ace, king, or queen.
8. She claimed that she didn't have a "small pair" when Garrett asked. She could have interpreted the question to mean "small (pocket) pair". And it's OK to lie during a hand!
9. I find it completely normal to get confused about what I said during a hand, after a hand. Admittedly, I'm 65 and she's not, but it's easy to get flustered/defensive when embroiled in a controversy, especially in a hand you made big mistakes in, whether those mistakes are bet sizing, misreading cards, talking when you should have shut up, getting someone's stack size wrong, calculating outs wrong, calculating pot odds wrong, or anything else.
Regardless of whether Garrett thought he was cheated, his beef should have been with HCL, not with her. Once a pot is pushed to someone, it is theirs, and your beef becomes a beef with the casino. VERY unprofessional of him to take the money back from her away from the table, even if she was offering that. We've all given or at least seen little "refunds" AT THE TABLE, with the permission of the floor, in odd circumstances. Maybe an uninvolved player's card fouls/mucks an opponent's hand, or a chop wasn't spotted until after a pot was pushed, or an 80 year old fish misread the suit of a card at the other end of the table, etc. But moving chips between players away from the table, with or without accusations of cheating, simply should not be done, and I blame Garrett for accepting it, more than I blame her for offering it.
You nailed it. Great comment.
I have made mistakes during the 100000s of live hands I have played in my life. I must admit also I have blurted out some nonsense explanations instead of admitting it. Robi doesn't owe Garrett anything. If he proves she cheated, come with the evidence or at least a plausible scenario, otherwise be a good sport and give her her money back.
I once called a loose player with 10 6suited because I was so curious to make his previous action make sense to me and learn how he plays. It was a limit game and not an all-in call. He had 10 8off and took down the pot anyway with his kicker, was embarrassing to have to explain why I called when the other players all asked how I didn’t win but it really came down to just that, curiosity. Besides, I mostly thought I was beat by at least a pair and wouldn’t have to show my hand.
This drama that got started, then kept increasing, is unfortunate for both players because neither of their reputations will go unquestioned from now on in the comments of all the reaction videos of this hand. It’s going to be remembered for its novelty of a drama afterwards as well as just a bizarre call. As for ethical behavior, I think it’s gonna suck to be Garrett cause he’ll not hear the end of this for a long time.
Ya, this all was just a bizarre session.
Maybe she was only signaled that she was ahead but not knowing his exact hand? Any poker player should know there's something up with that call and her explanation and offer to return the money makes it even more suspicious 🤔
That’s what I was thinking no one is that dumb if they are cheating to call there. She obviously just thought fuck it
When I first saw the hand without any commentary I was thinking: she misread her hand as j3 (she basically said it during the hand) and didn't want to admit it. That's what happened 100 percent. Garrett should give the money back.
The problem with that story is she rechecks her hand multiple times before calling. But I still don’t how she cheated. I’ve seen terrible players make calls based on “reads” despite only beating one hand. 🤷♂️
Maybe once she realized she only had Jack high she played it off like she made an epic call instead of just saying she misread her hand. Also I believe that she did have J3 in the previous hand. And in the moment even though she looked at her cards she could of still mixed up the two hands imo
He got outplayed! If he coerced her to give back what she won, that's strong-arm robbery and he should be charged and serve prison time if he's guilty.
Before she makes the call , she asks him “do you want me to call” you can then hear someone else says something like , I would say no ….. then a few seconds later she calls
I admit that there’s a lot of awkwardly implausible moments that she even herself can't explain but what I’m really confused with is suppose she committed a cheating, how on earth could she possibly cheat when she’s given in a flip-a-coin situation. I mean, I can’t really make sense of it. If I were in her shoes, I’d definitely pull off that cheating skills when the situation is more stacked in favor of me. I was just wondering…
Eric
read garret's tweets. it explains a lot more about how it makes sense to be cheating in this scenario.
@Bobby Dillon Now that I can make much more sense of it, thanks to your well-thought-out account. Thanks!:)
@@aark89 Definitely, I will !! Thx
@Bobby Dillon He is her backer, stakes her at low level games, so makes sense hes staking her at this game too. Some people have also said they have a thing going on, but shes married so idk about that one.
Considering a guy who can see the cards live got arrested for stealing, I would say there was something crooked going on.
So he's a thief that was caught thieving from his partner in crime? That's a huge stretch
She said she made a hero call. She said she misread her hand. Then she gave the money back. Something was DEFINITELY up here.
It was a crazy hand. It was one in a million, but Robi didn’t cheat!! Garrett should return the money to Robi
I agree. How could she cheat? If you know Garrett’s cards, there’s no way in hell you’re calling that. He has so many outs. She thought she was using the Jack as a bluff catcher and then realized after the hand how stupid it was based on the players reactions and then started to change her story so that she didn’t look so amateurish.
Agreed, give it back. If this girl wants to make 100k punts with J high, encourage her! I guess her play short circuited Garrett's bot brain
She didn’t have to explain herself, it didn’t matter. She clearly made a bad call, and was somehow correct. Imo she wouldn’t have called if she knew his hand because he had sooooo many outs.
You dont need to know what someones cards are to cheat, all you need to know is that you are ahead.
There are so many ways to cheat with live stream.
You can actually see her saying “ I have a bluff catcher” and for Garret to be such a sour looser this hand and this situation is going to hunt him down for the rest of his life.
Bro but what bluffs does she beat besides 87o or 87cc. It just bothers me after the pot she acts like she soul read owned Garret & obviously very nervous but can’t tell if it’s from her fishy play or being embarrassed she somehow won
It’s because she thought she had J3 supposedly, so yes, it is a bluff catcher.
But you can hear her saying that she had a bluff catcher. And as well just do the math and see how manny outs Garret had on the turn, 20 I think. If Garret would have won the pot he would have never complain about her calling his all in. Now do you think he was going to say “you lost the pot on the river let me return the money to you”
sorry, but her saying she had a bluff catcher only puts more blood on her hands, not less. the dupers delight/deceptive grin before she even called shows that she knows it's going to look bad when everyone sees her hand. note her pre-emptively mitigating the blowback by defending her call before she makes it because she knows the blowback is going to be strong the moment she turns her hand face up. that's also the reason it takes her so long to actually turn them up. she knew her hand was good, and she was slightly ashamed to have done what she did. when people make legitimate extremely strong calls on others who are bluffing, they are proud to turn it up and show everyone they knew the person was bluffing. she couldn't pass up the opportunity, but could sense the outrage that was coming.. her giving the money back (when has anyone ever done this willingly?) supports this and only makes it worse for her.
also, her hand isn't what most would consider a bluff catcher. typically, the minimum strength hand referred to a bluff catcher would be at least K/A high. that his hand was one of the ONLY hands that her hand was a bluff catcher against paints her into a corner for having said "but i have a bluff catcher" rather than getting her out of it.
equity wise Garrett is still the favorite before the river. The call was basically hoping to take the invested money back, in the long-run it's still just a chop.
Regardless of her terrible reasoning, the actions of her ‘business partner’ is literally proof of coercion and his / their little plan not working and getting rumbled. Innocent people don’t react like that.
I think she just made a fishy/lucky hero call that looked very sketchy to say the least. If she were cheating, she would pick a better spot to do it. I feel like she gave the money back because she felt pressured.
No such thing as a hero call with Jack high… Ace high fine, King high sure.. Queen high ehhhh probably not.. Jack high?? No such thing.
@@lordtraxx4217 100%. I've been playing poker for 13 years and I've NEVER at any level seen a jack high all in call.
This was, by far, one of the strangest hands I have ever seen. When she rolled her hand I feel like she felt like the table was going to explode and everyone was going to be like “ohhhhh shiiiiit!!!” but it was just a little awkward as everyone tried to process what the hell just happened. Garrett’s all in is great because he will get folds from better hands (small pairs, even over pairs, better flush draws). He has an open ended straight flush draw. Even if he gets called by a 10 (which will happen sometimes) he still has a ton of outs. That all in folds out better hands than J4o lol. I think it was great shove and a dumb call. Garrett does that for value with hands like A10 to cooler worse 10s. She 100% did NOT misread her hand because she checked her hand like 15 seconds before she called. She also said when she asked Garrett what would make him feel better about it, he said to split it. She just gave it all back to him. Andy asked her why she gave it all back and she said “I don’t know”.
she did an interview on the livestream and said much more than that. nice reporting tho, cnn
She responded with much more than "I don't know" c'mon man. Literally an entire explanation at the end.
@@maticus286 I am referring to right when she got back to the table and they were all talking about it. Andy asked her “why did you give it all back to him and she said “I don’t know”. What she said during the interview contradicted this response lol.
She got intimidate to give back the money.
Hello Lex, I love your videos thank you so much, I learn so much from your videos, I have been playing poker for years but I cant win, i am a losing poker player, your videos inspired me to keep playing and i am much better now, do you have any general advice for me to get me to the next level and thank you again. Ozman Abdel.
1. Staying true to your style of play is what gets you through the ups and downs of poker.
2. Patiently wait for tables that play to your strengths. (If you are tight find those loose tables.. etc. Etc.)
3. If you are not getting good vibes walk away.
4. If you can't spot the players you want to exploit in the first 20 minutes you can plan on being exploited.
5. Don't play outside of your means. Bankroll management is key to work through fluctuations.
6. Your poker bankroll should be separate from your bank account. If you start dipping into your utility bill money to fund poker you have a problem.
7. Bad beats.. part of life.. part of poker. Chin up and judge yourself by your play and getting in with the best of it and not by the runner runner someone pulled out of their ass to clean you out.
8. Always walk away after a bad beat. 5 min. 5 days. Whatever. Just walk away and give yourself time. Tilt is always realized retroactively.
9. Have fun. Poker is fun. Enjoy the ride.
Do they edit the live? Cause I didn’t see her look back at her hand on the live stream!! She never looked back at her cards on the live I seen at least!!!
I seen someone else analyzing this hand and they said she looked back at her cards!! That’s why I said this
This was SO bizarre! I have never seen Garrett act like that wtf. But like she's not a complete amateur, playing these huge stakes, so I kinda get where Garretts coming when he sees J4 os. I'm shocked still lol
Shock is one thing! but going to making cheating accusation and wants money $$$ with no prove is more outrageous shocking than her winning J high!!!
Either Robbi made a VERY questionable call or she knew what Garrett had. That’s it. Bothers me that she had a “business partner” at the table? What’s up with that? Then when she gave the money back, it looked REALLY bad for her. The story about “preserving production value”? What? She looks really bad. Agree that Garrett shouldn’t have taken the money back. I believe that was a mistake, but understand if he thought he was cheated and it belonged to him.
A cheater wouldn't give the money back. They would keep it, they are cheaters. An embarrassed person who is out of their element and is facing the crowd favorite, on camera with thousands of eyes on, could feel pressured by the situation to give it back and play peace maker.
Not only that, but she admitted on joeyIngrams RUclips show that he was backing her in this game. It was rips money she was playing w, that’s why he was butthurt when she gave it back.
I was looking for this to did she se his card but if you look Garett did protect his cards very good and she couldn’t se his cards ,even if you se his cards and you know what he have I don’t think anybody would call in that case to,Garett have huge advantage to win this hand anyway
In high stakes games this is common practice, rip had 50%
@@MikeySmithJones that depends on the personality. Some cheaters would give the money back, others wouldn't
The only bad thing she did was trying to explain her horrible but lucky play. Garrett entitlement attitude has no place at any table...the poker world has Phil Helmuth for that. Smh
Even if she knew his hand at that point, Garrett still has half the deck to bail him out and she agreed to run it twice so Garrett has two chances with half the deck I'm his favor. Unless she knew the order of the deck, as in, knew the full run out even with running it twice, then I'd say she just made a stubborn crying call hoping he had low clubs like he did
I agree, she would need to know what was coming to make a call like that and that’s unlikely. She made a foolish call and it worked.
If she folds, Garrett wins $161k
If she calls, Garrett has 53% of $270k or an equity of $143k
If she was cheating she would've stolen $19,000 worth of equity.
In poker most hand except like AA, KK, QQ make money from getting some percentage of folds when you are behind, even AK makes more money by making ppl fold than value betting.
So her not folding a must fold hand costs Garrett.
Obviously this is a terrible spot to cheat, there's much better spots where you steal more money and remain hidden from suspicion. But most cheaters are greedy they take every little edge they can, or the smart ones remain free of suspicion.
After he lost, Garrett could not accept the fact she called with such a bad hand and still won so he went to Ryan. To be fair, I think Robbi OFFERED the money back to Garrett. I don't think he demanded it. But he did take it.
Weird stuff happens in poker hands. Without knowing exactly what she had, Garrett tried to force her out and knew that even if his opponent calls the all in, he still had a good chance to win it with the straight and the flush draw. In fact he was a slight favorite. But she called and lady luck didn't smile on him this time.
The announcer Bart seems to have a bias in favor of Garrett and immediately started asking if something nefarious was going on. (Bias also shown in Charles/Garrett incident)
If Garrett would have won, there is NO WAY Garrett would have given the money back because she misread her hand.
I agree it was a bad call but she doesn't have to explain it at all. If Garrett would have won there would be no talk of cheating, only how bad a call it was. Wouldn't a cheater have to know what the river was going to be anyway? That brings in all kinds of conspiracy theories.
Garrett really looks like a sore loser. I wonder how Nick will defend him on this one.
I don't know but I think eventually Garrett will say he was wrong and try to give the money back to save his reputation. However Robbi might not take it lol. What a fiasco for HCL and their Golden Boy.
Great analysis! I agree with you 1000%!
Yeah no matter what really happened and what happens in the future, this has had a really negative impact on the players and the hustler live game. I personally think it wasnt cheating but conspiracies will fly and people will lose faith/not want to be associated with it anymore. Prob never see Ivey back either.
she made a donk call expecting to lose but ended up winning. THEY RAN IT TWICE, she didn't cheat. the way garrett reamed her off stream until she gave the money back was ridiculous. lost respect for G man over this, but not that he cares, i'm just some internet troll.
Really she made a good call she tells him I'm playing you not the hand. Every time Garrett does that bully play everyone folds and you cockriders call him the goat. Someone called his bluff . We all know it takes 5 cards for a straight not 4
What I don’t understand is why she says after the hand “I put you on ace high” and he then asks why she called w J high and she says “you didn’t have shit.” I do not think there was cheating involved, I just think that maybe she saw she had blockers and figured he was on a draw. Everything she said after the hand confused me
Who's the biggest sore loser?
Light Yagami (death note), Magnus Carlsen (chess), Garrett Adelstein (poker), Magnus Carlsen (chess960)
I've only watched this a couple times, but Garrett's expression is not one of disappointment... Even the commentators don't know what to make of it.
I interpreted his face after the she revealed her card as how did she cheat this hand. Looking around and all over her just to find a clue, a device, or a signal giver maybe?
We saw it all. She did not cheat regardless of her poor play.
I hope you are at my next poker table.
@@adrianamatlack532 I hope you you are as well.
@@adrianamatlack532 let me know when, I wanna join too.
Same i'd clean out your account with that mindset
There is a lot more info coming out indicating cheating along with her partner RIP. Stay tuned
Thanks for sharing this video. I read about after seeing video she shouldn't have given the money back unless he could prove she cheated. Even if she knew his cards he was still a favorite to win and they ran it twice.
Hmm, tough one…. Neither party will come out looking good here. Great video Lex…!
At one time I use to play with a guy named Ronny at Foxwoods, he's now a WSOP bracelet holder. He was beaten by Miss Finland in a televised game by a bizarrely played hand while he was holding trips and she had nothing, happens once in a while against clueless players.
So she called with nothing and beat trips? Wow!
In low level games sure. But calling off $100k? You would think someone would check their cards first.
RIP WAS HER BOYFRIEND TOO
100k and you give back the money... your full of crap robbie...you should be banned and garrett too
@@richardpoplis6777 No its not. Rip said a few streams ago he just had another baby with his wife.
Garrett was quiet for that moments because he was rethinking the hand
:Robbi to Garrett after winning the hand, “You look like you want to kill me.”
Garrett didn't get cheated.
If the money doesn't matter to him, why the hell does he ask for it back/ take it when she offers?
She's not the swiftest thing on two legs, why does her excuse have to make sense, sometimes players do dumb shit and really can't explain why.
She just made an emotional call on the turn and it worked out.
If he had a better hand and she lost, no one cares.
It just happened to work.
Even a broken clock is right every once in a while.
Accusing someone of cheating is bad form unless you can prove it or at least have some evidence.
Probability on one hand isn't a smoking gun.
And I imagine if this was another man instead of a woman, Garrett would not say anything unless he had proof.
The fact that a woman beat him with a shit hand just has to mean she cheated, no woman is that good is the mindset here.
10H 10C 9C 3H
i don't think you can really trust what anyone says at the table though. she could have been flustered and then embarrassed if she realized she had misread her hand. you do have to keep some sort of image at the table, so she does need to be careful what she says, but at the same time, she probably doesn't want to be in the middle of drama or called a cheater. giving it back, seems odd.
How do you explain her saying that he let her do it to him off stream. What other significance is there to that aside from her protesting too much that she isn't cheating?
She seems pretty confident saying 'I'm gonna get the money back' anyway when she gave back the money to Garrett.
If you misread a hand it's a funny situation, everybody makes it at least once in their career. Hell even Phil Ivey himself made misreads.
Also a winner you would want your opponent to think you were worse than you are and underestimate you, that's how you make money
@@maheshpun4804 i don't think she realized that she didn't have a pair until after she had all her chips in. for her to be cheating, that is going to take a number of other actors, and would have some pretty large implications. and the particulars are odd. she'd have to know the cards to come somehow as well in this case, it seems.
I’ve been in a hand like this and if the board is low and your opponent overbet shoves, he’s either got the nuts or a semi bluff with a draw. The most obvious draw is a straight. He probably doesn’t do this with Q, K, A or Pair plus because those have some showdown value. He’s is polarizing his hand. If he bets smaller, she folds. That sizing screams bluff with no showdown value or nuts and his behavior screamed bluff so she did nothing wrong. People are overreacting because of the dollar amount. If it was 1k at 5/10, people wouldn’t care but it’s a very smart play.
You are absolutely correct. It screams bluff........like Q-J for the open ended straight or A-K and I am still behind with jack high. She cheated badly.
So her J of clubs blocks his draws though. He can’t have KJ or QJ or AJ or clubs
@@joeltroughton3021 he probably value bets or checks since he’ll have show down value if he misses. This was clearly a bluff or nuts bet. She chose bluff.
@@holdemNE1 those hands you mentioned have value if he misses so why shove? If he bets smaller like for value, she folds. Betting to much is suspicious. She knew he had no value of winning if he misses his draw. People are only making a big deal because of the stakes
@@holdemNE1 you’d have more of a leg to stand on if this one at River but it was turn and he was polarizing his bet to say nuts or nothing. Those hands are not nothing. He had nothing but a draw. Zero value or nuts is what he was saying he had.
Robbi had 54% odds on the turn, Adelstein had 45% odds.
She put in her money with the best hand.
I guarantee you if she was a man, no one would be saying anything.
This even broke me. Just watching this with Garrets reaction to this unskilled girl at that table makes me sick!
What is the most disconcerting about this entire event is that Garrett coerced her into giving him the money back. Even if she offered to give the money back he should not have taken it back until a complete investigation was done. She won the hand fair and square. There doesn't appear to be any evidence of any kind of cheating and Garrett is not judge jury and executioner. Casino security or the man in the cowboy hat should have summoned the police and they should have arrested Garrett for theft. Theft by coercion. He cannot steal her money. In that moment she may be under duress or vulnerable? Garrett has issues. He should have said "nice hand. You caught me bluffing".
King simp right here. Everyone with a brain knows she cheated. You dont make that call, you lose to most bluffs. She gave the money back because she felt guilt. You also need to look up the defenition of theft. Voluntarily handing over money is not it bud.
Anon…exactly how did she cheat. Turns out she wants to save herself by not getting uninvited to future poker play, and, she wanted Garrett to not leave, which like a sore loser he was ready to leave. Under those 2 terms she gave half of pot back to him. Garret stealing the $, no, so yeah yer correct about that. But again, exactly how did she cheat?? She thought he was pushing her. She pushed back, if she misread her hand or not. She won, 100% fair and square.
it's not just what she said.. it's the totality of the situation. there are some incredibly accurate body-language clusters that indicate she knew exactly how bad the situation looked, from an omnipotent/omnipresent perspective -- meaning, she understood the entire scope of the hand, and then pre-emptively tried to mitigate the blowback she knew was incoming EVEN BEFORE SHE SAID CALL. examples of this: (a) dupers delight / her grinning a short time before she says call, (b) her asking him if he wanted her to call (to shift responsibility onto him, instead of her). It was only when she realized that all of this wasn't going to be worth the 120k she took from him that she decided to ret-con some made up story that she thought she had a 3 (she literally stares at her hand for 20 seconds when the action was on her, after he shoved).
in body-language analysis, it's never one thing that leaves a smoking gun. it's the odds that multiple things put together occur at the same time leading you to know whether someone is being deceptive or not. in that moment, she had no reason to appear deceptive because if she were truly conflicted about the call, all the smirking and dupers delight wouldn't have occurred.
I agree with this from a non expert perspective. Her grinning and gloating preemptively was the weirdest part of all of this for me.
I think she knew she made it too obvious with her call. After that her body language was just weird. Like she didn’t want to show. Then afterwards she didn’t seem happy that she won. Just looking away. I would have been stoked as hell.
Sadly, the odds of getting for sure incriminating evidence against her won't happen, but what this does signify is that cheating can easily happen at these events and that they need to crack down on check ins...pat downs, metal detectors, possibly lie detector tests before and after walking off the stage, especially when hundreds of thousands of dollars are on the line, which are stakes anyone would potentially cheat to take.
Guess she had Love-Sense Lush inside and the commentary of the stream sends vibration pattern when she is good to call 😂
I’m having a difficult time paying attention to her speak post hand. She’s fun to watch. Additionally, Some people just don’t care about money as much as others do.
Fun to watch? She looks scary with all the 🤡 makeup and plastic surgerys
My first thought was how she must be loaded
1.) why cheat against the best draw known to poker
2.) why make it so obvious if you were cheating, do it in a spot where you know you’ll win w high frequency and in a disguised spot
And 3)why run it twice
Another important point missed by everyone. Mathematically Garrett is favored to win at that point before the river. I'd take those odds any day.
At least Andy has some wherewithal to keenly ask the heated now cowboyless hat guy, how did he make her give the money back ? And follow up questions to figure out what happened because he was quite suspicious Garrett of all people would rob or steal from her as in a casino that would be the only way for him to force her to give the money back. Andy knew damn well she gave it back and it even further heightened his senses as to something sneaky happening.
She is undoubtedly telling the truth. Garret embarrassed himself and left.
Garrett got absolutely berated by Rick though, like he was being harassed, I'd leave at that point regardless.
If he can’t prove she was cheating Garrett is completely in the wrong. He’s the one who is always shoveling money in pots trying to bully people and now he’s taken it off the felt and bullied her for the money back.
What does her *_"Let me scratch my face, cuz that’s the shit I got"_* comment even mean?