If you make movies with AI, no one will think it's "quality". It's Dollar Store filmmaking. A cheap watch that turns your wrist green because the metal is fake, but it looks nice at first, but it only exists because everyone can afford it.
Not even seen a ai p**n scene that is worth watching yet, so it feels like fullenght movies is farther away then the first impression was. But when/if that happens, that would mean a lot more competition for the big studios. If all of this ai hype become a reality i see a future (unless corruption stops it) where there is no big corps, because execution of a idea has become so cheap and easy.
What's cool about Kling too is you can take anything in GIMP software and PNG it, then just paste over your model video frame or image and Kling will just do the rest of the work. Kling is getting really cool. Literally a Gorillas arm, crab eyes, and even a robots tail. Great video by the way.
to be fair, why is the image of the girl, that was uploaded in this video, so blurry ? Because Kling has a very high crap rate, where there are mistakes, where the face will deform-ate, where there is no consistent character. By uploading a model, where you have no clear face structures, you minimize the failure by kling, but thats not the aim. The aim is, to have a consistent character for a video, and kling can not produce the side angle from a face with consistency, when it has only the front perspective of the face. Kling should have an open Kling-Lora model, where you can do the finetune of the model. Without deleting wrong parts, you can never create a kling-lora, that is accepted by your face recognition in every second of the produced video. ( the kling double chin issues - 17.51 minute )
@@TomSmith-yh9ju Kling does have an option for more consistent faces. It's expensive though. But here a trick: increase the sharpness in photoshop or some free image software. The AI can see it better. It blurs are warps when it can't see it well as the video produces the images at different angles.
lets be honest. that was being done since they invented mannequins. have you notice how male mannequins are all 6,3 ft tall, lean, wide shoulders, small hips, huge bulge? that's like 1% of population but you'll see plenty of short chubby guys be like "i want that suit so bad" and when they wearing they look terrible
17:27 There is also countless [Browser Extensions] that add the "Save webP as PNG or JPEG" option directly into the context menu, where you usually choose "Save Image as...". That way you spare one step. I ran into those limitations on Kling, too.
First, I want to say how much I appreciated the way you taught-it was perfect and helped me so much. And then, about your reflection at the end-I absolutely love when you share those insights, thank you for bringing that in. For me, I think you’ll really have to manage and bring things together, becoming the conductor who makes it all work. I also think that, for sure, fields like photography, modeling, image editing, and so many others will become undervalued and undergo transformations. Everything will evolve.
Well done Sampson with a return to form of some of your previous videos. I think people like it when you illustrate particular AI solutions but then tie them to a business model. I liked your thoughts on how AI is changing the relative value of many aspects of society. Keep 'em coming!
Another use case is photography, if you own a photo studio you can easily change your clients outfit and even give them an animated video for social media easily
Real models are already using AI to their advantage. by cloning themselves and reacting directly to many fans at once. They have managed to directly monetize it. So, meeting the "real' person will be the prize in a sense since most of the industry will go AI becoming just another pebble in the sand.
@@mariomills And real talent and hard work can now reach fans directly. But, Hollywood and agencies still have all the connections and revenue streams. We have had Free programs like Blender for years that could do similar to AI, buthe artists still end up signing on the dotted line.
@@MarcoCholo-iz9js But yet Vinyl record sales are still increasing? Why? because folks can't get that out of digital. AI is awesome but there are certain things AI will never be able to do because it "requires" the real world.
These combo moves so SO AMAZING!! I was an apparel/fashion designer back in the day and the amount of hours and money this saves from concept to catalogue and videos is many thousands!$
"Wow, this is mind-blowing! The possibilities of AI in fashion photography are endless-creating stunning visuals, experimenting with designs, and even personalizing e-commerce experiences! Love how you broke down the process and shared practical tips. Truly the future of creativity and technology! 🚀✨"
Thanks for the video and thorough explanation. Honestly I highly doubt that any large E-commerce would hire an "AI-fashion stylist" if the CEO can just tell his secretary to spend a couple of days learning the soft and generate an entire collection herself. The more accessible the tool - the less monetary value the result has.
Fashion photography had already suffered a lot from general economic changes. So called “fast fashion” compounded the problem, there was no time or money for carefully-crafted lighting, makeup, long photo shoots with live models, etc. A lot of other things changed too, but the bottom line is that budgets for fashion photography have been dropping for years. This will be completely kill off of everything but the very highest-end photography for top designer brands 🙁
The outfits feature is not ready for production , i v just tried it out , not good( like it messes up the hands and fingers of the model and the resolution is not very good ) but its impressive that we can do such stuff today in a few month with more fine-tuning of these models it will be supa cool
Hi Samson, thanks so much for your insightful tutorials. They are so useful. One quick question: If a dress has a special design at the back and you want your model to turn and show the back design, how do you do that in Kling AI? Note that the 'start/ End frame' doesn't work with the 'Virtual Try on'
Amazing stuff - ive been playing with the kling updates when i saw ur video come in which fantastically helpful in navigating the new features. I think you are spot on with your summing up at end about value and that actually being a generalist is becoming even more powerful - i struggled for years with companies turning me down for roles or the usual silence as a response because they want niche or specific skills but I do believe strongly that these days it makes more sense whether working as freelance or for a company that being a generalist will be even more in demand as these tools empower us. They are opening the door to those of us with traditional skills in multiple creative disciplines to do things we know would have taken hours/days/weeks and can now do within minutes/hours/a day - i find it exciting and empowering and thinking about which directions to steer the most with my photography, video, design work + A.I tools
Fascinating video. Thank you for making it. One comment though: even if all the videos of clothing look amazing, there will still need to be a tailor or seamstress to actually craft the clothing item and there is no way to generate the pattern with the desired proportions. For the marketing though, this is incredible. Well done :)
You also need a automatized cloth factory, and employees to brother with the cloths pattern, but not from the cost from a single tailor, a model and a photograph. There is no point in trying to cut the price from 1 photograph and 1 model, when you need to deal with the amount of money required, and the amount of employee, to do this factory buziness... Or i miss something? This is only good for Internet influencers who grab a little of money atm, who will also lost their instagram youtube job in 1or 2 years, with the underneat AI technology coming from Nvidia and Google.
It isn't like anything was ever just an authentic photograph or video, they were always heavily edited anyways, this just eliminates some steps and makes it easier, cheaper, etc.
imagine having celebrity actors that doens't exist... oh wait, we always had them as fictional characters in movies and series, so there's no actual difference, people will still prefer anime waifus, and real celebrities, this AI models are just a wannabe of things that already exist
Tribalism is a deep survival instinct so I don't think it will go away anytime soon, and living in a world where you can aspire to more than average seams like a more exciting proposition.
I totally agree on the generalist idea. The window of opportunity for advertisement however is probably here just right now as a job opportunity as a soft skill. Soon given the easiness of it all, everyone will just do that by themselves.
The potential value is in applying apparel, etc. not to AI models, but to the potential buyer proxy model. I see value in that, even as someone who has minimal interest in fashion. Although I think there would be even greater value in incorporating that with custom tailored manufacturing, based upon individual buyer profile, using scanned measurements. Doesn't matter if it looked good on the buyer's shopping avatar, if it doesn't fit or wear properly in real life, or has to be altered/tailored. Barring the inevitable use of posting virtual try on sessions on social media as though the virtual outfits were what one was wearing that day IRL, of course. As for AI models in general, unless the brand cares more about image than time efficiency and cost reduction, they'll be in more common use moving forward (fast fashion, etc.). It will become an "exclusive" selling point for higher end brands (maybe eventually just high end brands) to do things the traditional way, with expensively produced product shoots and campaigns. That's unlikely to go away for the foreseeable future.
This AI is going to take over those cam sites. you know the ones i mean.. it's going to totally level the playing field. Whoever can afford to hire the compute power to render them earns the highest income.
@@redbull19733 People think that's a joke when I mention it, but they do not realize that due to the amount of women in the West who will be affected, the stock market for pharmaceuticals (depression medication), pet food, and anything that deals with women are going to skyrocket.
Video generators need to polish until that cartoonish/blur is gone, then we can call it real. I dont know what is this, but we are one step from being perfect
Hi Samson, thanks for the video. 11.11, how to make sure that the design on the back is correct? If it is not a t-shirt, but a jacket with different design on front and back?
Hey this is Golden info! Question: I did that with my own garment (a wedding dress) but the wedding dress did not appear to be the same one…. If it doesn’t capture the same one I can’t advertise as my own wedding dress. What’s the fix for accuracy? Thanks!!
Amazing tutorial and endless possibillites . However like you, I tried the midjourney generated image of the model as it with the original dimensions midjourney generates. However in my case , Kling gives this error that image is not meeting the requirements. I cropped the image to make dimensions lesser than the original one. It worked . but I want to use the exam dimensions of the image as generated by midjourney. Has anybody also faced this issues? A little help would be wonderful here.
This is great for clothing but what about general products? Things like kitchen appliances or a car or whatever. Clothing is well defined to something on the body but other products need other scenarios. What if I wanted to sell my super special Hot Sauce? Have a model eating wings or something with the bottle on the table.
Ugh getting so close for a local image to vid... I can't wait till Hunyan completes the diffuser weight for it. The results are amazing already on Comfyui but there is no consistency for a model yet.
taste and social awareness will become incresingly valuable. Workingwith AI is largely about curation with a little technical know how mixed in. Understanding what is good... what is attractive... what is successful will all be key abilities in the upcoming economy.
Honestly im completely new to this. Could i in theory take a photo of a dress in a store, create models wearing said dress. Create a marketing campaign for said brand and then see if they would be willing to hire me a marketer? Im really new to all of this and just throwing out my ides? Or is this old new etc?
I predicted this workflow for fashion designers and fashion retailers 20 years ago. The technology didn't exist then, with the available Autodesk tech, Adobe products, and the state of the Internet at the time. I see now the tech has arrived.
Underneath select a model, I don't have "Recommended" or "Custom". Where I am going wrong? I've only got "AI Outfit, Default and Upload. I can't upload my own model
Very interesting. How about this: are you able to have AI "unwrap" clothing and create patterns to duplicate some outfit? Say a pair of jeans on a skinny model resized for a hefty model to make? Exotic runway dresses spread flat and pdf cuts? Obviously hard but perhaps it's possible "soon"? All those "knockoff handbags" or whatever.
me gustan muchos tus videos, podes usar ejemplos usan heroes de marvel como Scarlet witch o Black widow, siempre fallan al tratar de generarlas y es una buena prueba, o de DC SuperGirl o Wonder Woman
Do you have a video explaining how I can (very simply) change the clothes on a static photo of a person? (All I want to do is change a bikini top on a person to a crop-top t-shirt.) This could be using ANY AI model (preferably the simplest). I don't need video. Thank you.
I think after a while people will tire of seeing AI generated imagery and wont want to see AI models and they will start to want to see some form of reality. (or illusion of reality) and in some aspects, sure websites/stores etc will use AI models to advertise their clothing etc, but I think there will eventually be a push back! and people will want to see real people wearing real products. As a hobby photographer that shoots glamour&art-nude style shots despite editing and enhancing/processing images to create an artistic image, I still want to work with a real Human Being a real person, capture their images, working with a real human, getting real facial expressions and real movements not simulated or programmed recreations of people. Its important to me the images that are created through are from a real person, your capturing the beauty of a real person. When I look through instagram now and facebook feeds and websites and AI is everyplace and you cannot believe your eyes and you start to look for glitches to see if people are real or not.
Using enhance filters is also AI, so you can't trust on real people's photos as well The same goes for makeup, though It will get here being very realistic, because AI has a lot of human material to learn from I think it will coexist, but will bite off a portion of market
Unfortunately, by the time there is pushback, of any weight that matters, the models will be indistinguishable from reality. The AI Tsunami will swallow and drown hundreds of millions of careers around the world, before the general public take it seriously. Look, you gotta realize that America chose Mr. Deregulation himself to be in charge as AI ramps up job capture. We're f'd. If you can't beat em, join em, while you still can.
If you're enhancing and post processing it, how is it real anymore? You want to sell fake beauty to the world but draw the line here. Please... homie, I can't wait for AI to replace actors and celebrities. We will finally celebrate the true beauty of humanity, our brains.
haha, 😂 that's like asking the (fashion) industry to not use skinny women and chiselled men to show their products. A handful have tried over the years and some have failed terribly (Dove, Victoria Secrets). Consumers will give a shit who's depicted, they already know models have been "fake" since the invention of Photoshop and they still don't care. Just like music _consumers_ give a shit about autotuned vocals and playlists on Spotify & Co. full of fake artists provided by the labels and auto generated music, where virtually all songs sound the same and don't exceed the 3 minute mark for those with short attention spans... If there's money to be made, any industry will try hard to save as much as possible at the expense of humans; in this case real models - pretty or not.
@@BobbyMasteria when you've created a video with kling, there's a buttom at the bottom which says lip sync, click that and you can either use kling to generate audio in english/chinese, or use your own audio clip and the video will be modified so that the character on it speaks whatever lines/audio you gave it
The whole point of having a model is to show people how the clothes will look on a human being. As a woman, I don't want to see a cartoon with no imperfections presenting those clothes.It's so off putting..
I think a question worth asking is why use any models at all? What reason was there ever to use human models in the first place? They added to costs and it would have been perfectly possible to simply display the clothes on manekins. Clearly the human models were adding a value of some sort that made the costs of using them worth paying. But what was that value? Until we know the answer to this question it's not clear that replacing those human models with AI Generated models is going to work. I can certainly imagine a future scenario in which robot women stride along a catwalk displaying clothes, for example- but even if those robots were cosmetically flawless and looked like real people, would this be the same as having actual human models? What is not yet clear I think is to what degree it matters that the people in advertising images and videos are real people- the working assumption seems to be that it does not matter at all. as long as the AI replacements are good enough to traverse the uncanny valley, they will be acceptable to consumers- this seems to be the belief. This may be true and it may not. The unexamined aspect here is the degree to which AI itself changes the world in which AI is going to be deployed. As AI replaces the real and the authentic with the unreal and the fake the possibility exists that this process will trigger a kind existential allergic response among consumers as their ability to trust in anything they see in media is eroded, which may in the long term generate a hostility to fake content made using AI, which could blow back on those using AI as a means to build relationships with their customers. At present AI is not yet the dominant form- it gets a free pass because most people still assume that the content they see is authentic. At a given point this perception will flip and the default assumption becomes that most content is fake- how this paradigm shift is percived will determine the long term viability of AI content as a commercial tool.
I guess using models makes people more likely to buy an item even if the mannequins are useful but I’d say seeing the clothes worn on a human being compared to a mannequin draw a lot more people in. I guess it creates a feeling of trust, unconsciously. And it can also be used as eye candy, a lot of people are going to buy the item because it looks good on a model that looks good and this gives a certain unconscious thought that 'oh, I want to look as cool wearing this' I think that’s why fashion videos where people try things on the internet are still so popular because it’s just a human thing. Now with AI, maybe there will come a problem of relatability from the consumer side, we’ll have people to be really open-minded - since there seems to be a pretty persistent boycott culture going on. The ai models will have to look really realistic.
The synthetic/artificial take over of the world is in progress. Synthetic drugs, GMO/artificial food, fake people, synthetic materials/clothing, fake news and information, immersive environments/virtual reality. Best to stay real, in an increasingly unreal world.
@V1V1DOFFICIAL I think the trust thing you mention may be the problem- if a brand tries to build trust with it's consumers by using fake people this sends a really odd message. Where in this scenario does the fake end and the real begin? If the model is fake are the clothes fake too? Or are we to trust that the clothes are real even if the 'person' wearing them is not? Advertising is a relationship between the brand and the consumer- and it's hard to see how you could build trusting relationships by using tools that operate by generating things are not what they seem to be.
@@MIchaelSybi It's the messaging that puzzles me- it's like 'Trust me because this fake person tells you to?' How does that work? If the model in the image or the video is not not real, why am I going to think that the clothes they are wearing are real? Once you start down this road of faking things the line between real and not real becomes blurred- and people are already exploiting this blurred line by showing images online of AI generated products that either don't exist or look nothing like the AI generated images when you buy them. Strange as it may sound advertising is built on trust- and generative AI is a technology defined by it's ability to create fakes. Personally I think generative AI will be a disaster for advertising because it will corrode the basis of trust between the advertiser and the consumer.
Can you better define *what you mean by* 'soft-skills' and being a 'generalist' - it' is hard to contemplate something that is left so open (imo) - otherwise, an amazing video - thank you 😁
Great point! I’ll dive deeper into these ideas in an upcoming video. The key takeaway: master multiple disciplines well enough to guide AI effectively, while prioritizing human qualities like empathy, connection, and trust.
Basically become a real person who fails alot and tries again with emotions, relationships and hardships until you die in a period. Perfect society tools make you a tool to be perfect but its not. We just need to chat anyone like we used to be in the past. Maybe a old phone with a ringer. Might work lol ha ha.
Is there nothing like Kling we can install on our pc, Kling is very expensive with the stupid credits system they currently have, to get anything consistent it involves spending a lot of money on credits to try different ideas.
I wonder if this could be stated as false marketing in EU, because the AI model is just taught how things should look, not how they ACTUALLY look. And this becomes especially true if there is a new unique garment that is being sold but the AI think that it is carried by the person like another piece of clothing that it was trained on.
Try AI Avatar Video Generator bit.ly/4g8PHE6
Can I use my existing AI influencer from Rendernet?
your mustache looks like Hitler 🤣
17:49 me trying not to cry after the barber cut my hair
LOOOOL
🤣
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I think 1 man director making whole movies will become possible. Quality will be key for success. 🚀 🎉😮
Unreal 5 allows for world building, add AI to that and you could simulate your own virtual world.
Probably won't even need a director.
If you make movies with AI, no one will think it's "quality". It's Dollar Store filmmaking. A cheap watch that turns your wrist green because the metal is fake, but it looks nice at first, but it only exists because everyone can afford it.
Not even seen a ai p**n scene that is worth watching yet, so it feels like fullenght movies is farther away then the first impression was. But when/if that happens, that would mean a lot more competition for the big studios.
If all of this ai hype become a reality i see a future (unless corruption stops it) where there is no big corps, because execution of a idea has become so cheap and easy.
@@shulmanator I would argue most movies now from Disney/Hollywood are no longer quality.
What's cool about Kling too is you can take anything in GIMP software and PNG it, then just paste over your model video frame or image and Kling will just do the rest of the work. Kling is getting really cool. Literally a Gorillas arm, crab eyes, and even a robots tail. Great video by the way.
to be fair, why is the image of the girl, that was uploaded in this video, so blurry ? Because Kling has a very high crap rate, where there are mistakes, where the face will deform-ate,
where there is no consistent character. By uploading a model, where you have no clear face structures, you minimize the failure by kling, but thats not the aim. The aim is, to have a consistent character for a video, and kling can not produce the side angle from a face with consistency, when it has only the front perspective of the face. Kling should have an open Kling-Lora model, where you can do the finetune of the model. Without deleting wrong parts, you can never create a kling-lora, that is accepted by your face recognition in every second of the produced video. ( the kling double chin issues - 17.51 minute )
@@TomSmith-yh9ju Kling does have an option for more consistent faces. It's expensive though. But here a trick: increase the sharpness in photoshop or some free image software. The AI can see it better. It blurs are warps when it can't see it well as the video produces the images at different angles.
The irony is thick: they're selling the illusion of perfection, while a truly perfect (and artificial) competitor is waiting in the wings.
lets be honest. that was being done since they invented mannequins. have you notice how male mannequins are all 6,3 ft tall, lean, wide shoulders, small hips, huge bulge? that's like 1% of population
but you'll see plenty of short chubby guys be like "i want that suit so bad" and when they wearing they look terrible
@@Cualquiercosa5049😂
17:27 There is also countless [Browser Extensions] that add the "Save webP as PNG or JPEG" option directly into the context menu, where you usually choose "Save Image as...". That way you spare one step. I ran into those limitations on Kling, too.
I was not expecting you to be in that photo array at 0:15 and I almost spilled my coffee. That was amazing!
Ha! I'm glad you enjoyed it,
pffffffftttt ha ha ha. Yeah right.
@@aisamsonreal My experience is at odds with yours. I am not paid by Kling, are you?
First, I want to say how much I appreciated the way you taught-it was perfect and helped me so much. And then, about your reflection at the end-I absolutely love when you share those insights, thank you for bringing that in.
For me, I think you’ll really have to manage and bring things together, becoming the conductor who makes it all work. I also think that, for sure, fields like photography, modeling, image editing, and so many others will become undervalued and undergo transformations. Everything will evolve.
Well done Sampson with a return to form of some of your previous videos. I think people like it when you illustrate particular AI solutions but then tie them to a business model. I liked your thoughts on how AI is changing the relative value of many aspects of society. Keep 'em coming!
Many thanks!
Great tutorial. Love the content. The best thing is when you reason about the possible future for these and possibly new professions.
I appreciate that!
I honestly love your videos! You are not just highly intelligent, you are also a very good tutor. Well done mate!
Thank you very much!
Another use case is photography, if you own a photo studio you can easily change your clients outfit and even give them an animated video for social media easily
Real models are already using AI to their advantage. by cloning themselves and reacting directly to many fans at once. They have managed to directly monetize it. So, meeting the "real' person will be the prize in a sense since most of the industry will go AI becoming just another pebble in the sand.
Artists should be grateful, now their work has increased irl in value
But what happens when studios stop using models altogether and create a virtual girl to circumvent royalties
@@mariomills And real talent and hard work can now reach fans directly. But, Hollywood and agencies still have all the connections and revenue streams. We have had Free programs like Blender for years that could do similar to AI, buthe artists still end up signing on the dotted line.
@@MarcoCholo-iz9js But yet Vinyl record sales are still increasing? Why? because folks can't get that out of digital. AI is awesome but there are certain things AI will never be able to do because it "requires" the real world.
@@insurancecasino5790 I doubt those buying Vinyl are Millenials or later. Boomers and older can only carry that trend so far. Then its game over.
These combo moves so SO AMAZING!! I was an apparel/fashion designer back in the day and the amount of hours and money this saves from concept to catalogue and videos is many thousands!$
"Wow, this is mind-blowing! The possibilities of AI in fashion photography are endless-creating stunning visuals, experimenting with designs, and even personalizing e-commerce experiences! Love how you broke down the process and shared practical tips. Truly the future of creativity and technology! 🚀✨"
Thanks for the video and thorough explanation. Honestly I highly doubt that any large E-commerce would hire an "AI-fashion stylist" if the CEO can just tell his secretary to spend a couple of days learning the soft and generate an entire collection herself. The more accessible the tool - the less monetary value the result has.
Happy new year AI Sampson
Fashion photography had already suffered a lot from general economic changes. So called “fast fashion” compounded the problem, there was no time or money for carefully-crafted lighting, makeup, long photo shoots with live models, etc. A lot of other things changed too, but the bottom line is that budgets for fashion photography have been dropping for years.
This will be completely kill off of everything but the very highest-end photography for top designer brands 🙁
The outfits feature is not ready for production , i v just tried it out , not good( like it messes up the hands and fingers of the model and the resolution is not very good ) but its impressive that we can do such stuff today in a few month with more fine-tuning of these models it will be supa cool
Hi Samson, thanks so much for your insightful tutorials. They are so useful.
One quick question: If a dress has a special design at the back and you want your model to turn and show the back design, how do you do that in Kling AI? Note that the 'start/ End frame' doesn't work with the 'Virtual Try on'
I don’t know who needs to hear this, but ebook titled The Elite Society's Money Manifestation might be the answer you’re looking for
spammers go to hell. and they are barbequed there.. so stop spamming.
0:12 This video was just an excuse for you to wear that dress. Admit it! 😂😂
Haha! You should see my wardrobe.
😂😂
@@aisamsonreal and when it moves it moves like 🙈
"FINALLY!" 0:15 "A video you can share those new shoes and matching outfit without worrying that someone might make fun of the shoes!"..Awesome!
Samson the new fancy fashion model! 😂
Amazing stuff - ive been playing with the kling updates when i saw ur video come in which fantastically helpful in navigating the new features.
I think you are spot on with your summing up at end about value and that actually being a generalist is becoming even more powerful - i struggled for years with companies turning me down for roles or the usual silence as a response because they want niche or specific skills but I do believe strongly that these days it makes more sense whether working as freelance or for a company that being a generalist will be even more in demand as these tools empower us.
They are opening the door to those of us with traditional skills in multiple creative disciplines to do things we know would have taken hours/days/weeks and can now do within minutes/hours/a day - i find it exciting and empowering and thinking about which directions to steer the most with my photography, video, design work + A.I tools
Great to hear! All the best with your projects
Love the stencil art. Just the idea I needed for what to do next.
Thank you for this! Are you also sharing your image prompt creation GPT mentioned at 5:38?
Fascinating video. Thank you for making it. One comment though: even if all the videos of clothing look amazing, there will still need to be a tailor or seamstress to actually craft the clothing item and there is no way to generate the pattern with the desired proportions. For the marketing though, this is incredible. Well done :)
You also need a automatized cloth factory, and employees to brother with the cloths pattern, but not from the cost from a single tailor, a model and a photograph. There is no point in trying to cut the price from 1 photograph and 1 model, when you need to deal with the amount of money required, and the amount of employee, to do this factory buziness... Or i miss something? This is only good for Internet influencers who grab a little of money atm, who will also lost their instagram youtube job in 1or 2 years, with the underneat AI technology coming from Nvidia and Google.
It isn't like anything was ever just an authentic photograph or video, they were always heavily edited anyways, this just eliminates some steps and makes it easier, cheaper, etc.
I love everything about your videos 👍
This makes a lot of sense...going from specialist to generalist. I myself, have witnessed this trend in the film industry
Just imagine a world where we don't have celebrity actors telling us how we should live, because there aren't any of them
🤨🤔😳
I can hardly wait
imagine having celebrity actors that doens't exist...
oh wait, we always had them as fictional characters in movies and series,
so there's no actual difference,
people will still prefer anime waifus, and real celebrities,
this AI models are just a wannabe of things that already exist
@@Mente_Fugaz people will create their own avatars and art
Tribalism is a deep survival instinct so I don't think it will go away anytime soon, and living in a world where you can aspire to more than average seams like a more exciting proposition.
@@tuckerbugeater stable diffussion is there since 2021, why you keep saying " will " like something in the future?
Thank you so much for making this video. I literally was telling myself yesterday that I wish I could do this and sure enough your video popped up🎉❤
Glad I could help!
I totally agree on the generalist idea.
The window of opportunity for advertisement however is probably here just right now as a job opportunity as a soft skill. Soon given the easiness of it all, everyone will just do that by themselves.
The potential value is in applying apparel, etc. not to AI models, but to the potential buyer proxy model. I see value in that, even as someone who has minimal interest in fashion. Although I think there would be even greater value in incorporating that with custom tailored manufacturing, based upon individual buyer profile, using scanned measurements. Doesn't matter if it looked good on the buyer's shopping avatar, if it doesn't fit or wear properly in real life, or has to be altered/tailored. Barring the inevitable use of posting virtual try on sessions on social media as though the virtual outfits were what one was wearing that day IRL, of course.
As for AI models in general, unless the brand cares more about image than time efficiency and cost reduction, they'll be in more common use moving forward (fast fashion, etc.). It will become an "exclusive" selling point for higher end brands (maybe eventually just high end brands) to do things the traditional way, with expensively produced product shoots and campaigns. That's unlikely to go away for the foreseeable future.
This AI is going to take over those cam sites. you know the ones i mean.. it's going to totally level the playing field. Whoever can afford to hire the compute power to render them earns the highest income.
Invest in catfood and boxed wine
Good. That needs distruption.
@@redbull19733 People think that's a joke when I mention it, but they do not realize that due to the amount of women in the West who will be affected, the stock market for pharmaceuticals (depression medication), pet food, and anything that deals with women are going to skyrocket.
It will also affect marriages when they put AI on robot dolls.
@@sun-eye well, it would have to be a bit more than AI in a robot doll. It would need to be nearly indistinguishable from the real thing.
Video generators need to polish until that cartoonish/blur is gone, then we can call it real. I dont know what is this, but we are one step from being perfect
You have already seen tons of AI videos.. without ever knowing
Give it a month.
Some are already very polished and not cartoonish at all !
Part of that look is because of AI was trained on real TikTokers who intentionally try to look like they are made out of rubber.
Snapchat filters...
Hi, very nice. What about necklace and bracelets? Is this also possible ?
People always love AUTHENTIC models 🥰🥰🥰😍😍😍😍🤗🤗🤗😘😘😘😘😘
This has come a long way! I like how your image has that wrap animation. Is that loom?
Hi Samson, thanks for the video. 11.11, how to make sure that the design on the back is correct? If it is not a t-shirt, but a jacket with different design on front and back?
I love these! I made a bunch of them from scratch since stable diffusion entered
Hey this is Golden info! Question: I did that with my own garment (a wedding dress) but the wedding dress did not appear to be the same one…. If it doesn’t capture the same one I can’t advertise as my own wedding dress. What’s the fix for accuracy?
Thanks!!
Interesting video, thanks. I wish you all the best to keep it up in 2025!
Amazing tutorial and endless possibillites . However like you, I tried the midjourney generated image of the model as it with the original dimensions midjourney generates. However in my case , Kling gives this error that image is not meeting the requirements. I cropped the image to make dimensions lesser than the original one. It worked . but I want to use the exam dimensions of the image as generated by midjourney. Has anybody also faced this issues? A little help would be wonderful here.
This is great for clothing but what about general products? Things like kitchen appliances or a car or whatever. Clothing is well defined to something on the body but other products need other scenarios. What if I wanted to sell my super special Hot Sauce? Have a model eating wings or something with the bottle on the table.
Ugh getting so close for a local image to vid... I can't wait till Hunyan completes the diffuser weight for it. The results are amazing already on Comfyui but there is no consistency for a model yet.
But how do you download the video or image to upload to a website for example?
I have to agree...that for models are a bit complicated position with A.I...
thanks man! much love from germany. keep up the great work
Appreciate it!
taste and social awareness will become incresingly valuable. Workingwith AI is largely about curation with a little technical know how mixed in. Understanding what is good... what is attractive... what is successful will all be key abilities in the upcoming economy.
Any alternative that works on jewelry?
@aiSamson how did you do the lipsyncing after the image to video part ?
kling lip-sync, will do a full rundown in future!
Honestly im completely new to this. Could i in theory take a photo of a dress in a store, create models wearing said dress. Create a marketing campaign for said brand and then see if they would be willing to hire me a marketer? Im really new to all of this and just throwing out my ides? Or is this old new etc?
Is the clothing modeling feature only available on upgraded plan?
Earned a sub, thanks!
Which Ai will you choose between runway and Kling 1.6 for animating a course influencer generated by rendernet
I predicted this workflow for fashion designers and fashion retailers 20 years ago. The technology didn't exist then, with the available Autodesk tech, Adobe products, and the state of the Internet at the time. I see now the tech has arrived.
Underneath select a model, I don't have "Recommended" or "Custom". Where I am going wrong? I've only got "AI Outfit, Default and Upload. I can't upload my own model
Amazing!
Thank you for another great video !
Thank you too!
any idea what to use for try on jewelry?
Are you aware of a similar tool to place objects for product photography? ie. consistent objects?
Very interesting. How about this: are you able to have AI "unwrap" clothing and create patterns to duplicate some outfit? Say a pair of jeans on a skinny model resized for a hefty model to make? Exotic runway dresses spread flat and pdf cuts? Obviously hard but perhaps it's possible "soon"? All those "knockoff handbags" or whatever.
Nice thumbnail lol. I did click on it tho because this feels actually kind of game changing - no ulterior motives here ;)
me gustan muchos tus videos, podes usar ejemplos usan heroes de marvel como Scarlet witch o Black widow, siempre fallan al tratar de generarlas y es una buena prueba, o de DC SuperGirl o Wonder Woman
Can this be used on your own physical products, for instance an air fryer or whatever you can think of?
If you can put a dress on it, it'll work.
Do you have a video explaining how I can (very simply) change the clothes on a static photo of a person? (All I want to do is change a bikini top on a person to a crop-top t-shirt.) This could be using ANY AI model (preferably the simplest). I don't need video. Thank you.
This video was so eye-opening as a photographer
can you upload both the front and back of a clothing item?
14:40 I'm sorry. "Star Wars space....ship." ??🤨
😂
It was mentioned that there was a special GPT for the prompts. What is it?
I'm also curious about this.
here you go
ruclips.net/video/c86ZyqJn6Q8/видео.html
What lip synching software do you use? I don't get those results in Kling
Is Midjourney still expensive?, maybe some video's of doing this using my very expensive GPU, localy?
Would this work for jewelry?
Unbelievable level of possibilities wow
Awesome :-) thank you!
second 11 - thank you for your sense of humour 💕
This is incredible.
Thanks going learn this think your channel has it all
can you put 60 different brand logos on to the cloth?
I think after a while people will tire of seeing AI generated imagery and wont want to see AI models and they will start to want to see some form of reality. (or illusion of reality) and in some aspects, sure websites/stores etc will use AI models to advertise their clothing etc, but I think there will eventually be a push back! and people will want to see real people wearing real products.
As a hobby photographer that shoots glamour&art-nude style shots despite editing and enhancing/processing images to create an artistic image, I still want to work with a real Human Being a real person, capture their images, working with a real human, getting real facial expressions and real movements not simulated or programmed recreations of people.
Its important to me the images that are created through are from a real person, your capturing the beauty of a real person. When I look through instagram now and facebook feeds and websites and AI is everyplace and you cannot believe your eyes and you start to look for glitches to see if people are real or not.
Using enhance filters is also AI, so you can't trust on real people's photos as well
The same goes for makeup, though
It will get here being very realistic, because AI has a lot of human material to learn from
I think it will coexist, but will bite off a portion of market
At the end the only thing to photography, would be the humanity with the ass on the floor, liking stones :/
Unfortunately, by the time there is pushback, of any weight that matters, the models will be indistinguishable from reality. The AI Tsunami will swallow and drown hundreds of millions of careers around the world, before the general public take it seriously. Look, you gotta realize that America chose Mr. Deregulation himself to be in charge as AI ramps up job capture. We're f'd. If you can't beat em, join em, while you still can.
If you're enhancing and post processing it, how is it real anymore? You want to sell fake beauty to the world but draw the line here. Please... homie, I can't wait for AI to replace actors and celebrities. We will finally celebrate the true beauty of humanity, our brains.
haha, 😂 that's like asking the (fashion) industry to not use skinny women and chiselled men to show their products. A handful have tried over the years and some have failed terribly (Dove, Victoria Secrets).
Consumers will give a shit who's depicted, they already know models have been "fake" since the invention of Photoshop and they still don't care. Just like music _consumers_ give a shit about autotuned vocals and playlists on Spotify & Co. full of fake artists provided by the labels and auto generated music, where virtually all songs sound the same and don't exceed the 3 minute mark for those with short attention spans...
If there's money to be made, any industry will try hard to save as much as possible at the expense of humans; in this case real models - pretty or not.
Great video, thank you!
does this only work for simple clothing?
to me the real revolution will occur when those models will be able to talk, as you did in the intro
You can do that already with kling
@@therightstuff where exactly ?
@@BobbyMasteria when you've created a video with kling, there's a buttom at the bottom which says lip sync, click that and you can either use kling to generate audio in english/chinese, or use your own audio clip and the video will be modified so that the character on it speaks whatever lines/audio you gave it
The talking isn't smooth yet
@@HarryClipzFilmz you mean the voice generation or the lip sync? I find the lip sync to be fine but the ai voices pretty generic
the intro reminds me of West World where they updated the hosts with "reveries" pretty scary stuff
You're awesome, thanks!!
You're welcome!
What if the actual person who looks like those Ai models sue you? Can we put someone images without their consent?
many people look like many people. that would only apply to top celebrities and top brands. smaller businesses will go 100% unnotice
The same should be done for hair styles... That would be awsomeness
The B cut jumpscare 😂🦄
Very beautiful and lovely ❤❤❤❤❤❤
The whole point of having a model is to show people how the clothes will look on a human being. As a woman, I don't want to see a cartoon with no imperfections presenting those clothes.It's so off putting..
I think a question worth asking is why use any models at all? What reason was there ever to use human models in the first place? They added to costs and it would have been perfectly possible to simply display the clothes on manekins. Clearly the human models were adding a value of some sort that made the costs of using them worth paying.
But what was that value? Until we know the answer to this question it's not clear that replacing those human models with AI Generated models is going to work. I can certainly imagine a future scenario in which robot women stride along a catwalk displaying clothes, for example- but even if those robots were cosmetically flawless and looked like real people, would this be the same as having actual human models?
What is not yet clear I think is to what degree it matters that the people in advertising images and videos are real people- the working assumption seems to be that it does not matter at all. as long as the AI replacements are good enough to traverse the uncanny valley, they will be acceptable to consumers- this seems to be the belief.
This may be true and it may not. The unexamined aspect here is the degree to which AI itself changes the world in which AI is going to be deployed. As AI replaces the real and the authentic with the unreal and the fake the possibility exists that this process will trigger a kind existential allergic response among consumers as their ability to trust in anything they see in media is eroded, which may in the long term generate a hostility to fake content made using AI, which could blow back on those using AI as a means to build relationships with their customers.
At present AI is not yet the dominant form- it gets a free pass because most people still assume that the content they see is authentic. At a given point this perception will flip and the default assumption becomes that most content is fake- how this paradigm shift is percived will determine the long term viability of AI content as a commercial tool.
I guess using models makes people more likely to buy an item even if the mannequins are useful but I’d say seeing the clothes worn on a human being compared to a mannequin draw a lot more people in. I guess it creates a feeling of trust, unconsciously. And it can also be used as eye candy, a lot of people are going to buy the item because it looks good on a model that looks good and this gives a certain unconscious thought that 'oh, I want to look as cool wearing this' I think that’s why fashion videos where people try things on the internet are still so popular because it’s just a human thing. Now with AI, maybe there will come a problem of relatability from the consumer side, we’ll have people to be really open-minded - since there seems to be a pretty persistent boycott culture going on. The ai models will have to look really realistic.
The synthetic/artificial take over of the world is in progress. Synthetic drugs, GMO/artificial food, fake people, synthetic materials/clothing, fake news and information, immersive environments/virtual reality. Best to stay real, in an increasingly unreal world.
@V1V1DOFFICIAL I think the trust thing you mention may be the problem- if a brand tries to build trust with it's consumers by using fake people this sends a really odd message.
Where in this scenario does the fake end and the real begin? If the model is fake are the clothes fake too? Or are we to trust that the clothes are real even if the 'person' wearing them is not?
Advertising is a relationship between the brand and the consumer- and it's hard to see how you could build trusting relationships by using tools that operate by generating things are not what they seem to be.
@@paulhiggins5165 It might not look like in AI version. But for a cheap online shop it could work, not for elite brands
@@MIchaelSybi It's the messaging that puzzles me- it's like 'Trust me because this fake person tells you to?' How does that work? If the model in the image or the video is not not real, why am I going to think that the clothes they are wearing are real?
Once you start down this road of faking things the line between real and not real becomes blurred- and people are already exploiting this blurred line by showing images online of AI generated products that either don't exist or look nothing like the AI generated images when you buy them.
Strange as it may sound advertising is built on trust- and generative AI is a technology defined by it's ability to create fakes.
Personally I think generative AI will be a disaster for advertising because it will corrode the basis of trust between the advertiser and the consumer.
Do you know how it does with tattoos on the models?
the try on version is for premium members ?
The only fan version it will be lol ha ha. Business to make the business happening still after a free model. Game over for everyone nw. 😂
Can you better define *what you mean by* 'soft-skills' and being a 'generalist' - it' is hard to contemplate something that is left so open (imo) - otherwise, an amazing video - thank you 😁
Great point! I’ll dive deeper into these ideas in an upcoming video.
The key takeaway: master multiple disciplines well enough to guide AI effectively, while prioritizing human qualities like empathy, connection, and trust.
Basically become a real person who fails alot and tries again with emotions, relationships and hardships until you die in a period. Perfect society tools make you a tool to be perfect but its not. We just need to chat anyone like we used to be in the past. Maybe a old phone with a ringer. Might work lol ha ha.
Is there nothing like Kling we can install on our pc, Kling is very expensive with the stupid credits system they currently have, to get anything consistent it involves spending a lot of money on credits to try different ideas.
Thx!
I wonder if this could be stated as false marketing in EU, because the AI model is just taught how things should look, not how they ACTUALLY look. And this becomes especially true if there is a new unique garment that is being sold but the AI think that it is carried by the person like another piece of clothing that it was trained on.
A young Liam Nielsen amazing likeness bro
Hell yea !! Can't wait for the entire entertainment industry to change. AI will fix this world.