I think if you've got a variety of sizes, it's best to alternate putting them in. Every time you add in bigger pieces, gaps will form between them. Putting in smaller pieces to fill in these gaps will use up all the space. Keep alternating all the way up and you should end up with a dense cup.
because few people take the effort to fill the cup completely around. of 1*3 lego in total of 240 additionally, bring a cup for a discount. Most often, users simply scoop lego or handfuls at a time while purchasing a fresh cup each time at 100-140 lego. don't forget to factor in the different and odds side lego.
@@kaboomwinn4026 Also he cost of making a brick/piece is significantly lower than average pice you would pay at the store (or resell sites like bricklink)
@@kaboomwinn4026 what he said. People don't spend time with it. They chuck it and this it being opposite effect and being more expensive so lego gains money in that situation
It also doesn't cost lego 10 cents a brick to manufacture. That price for sets includes designers time making the set great which isn't needed for pick a brick
I remember when I was 11 I went to Legoland in NYC and grabbed a cup and started selecting pieces and my dad made me put it back because “You can just do that online for cheaper.” Biggest regret ever. I can’t even get into Lego in NYC anymore because the number of tourists has tripled! Last I got in some lady kept ramming me with her stroller and the pick a brick wall had a 2 hour wait!
Thank you for taking the time for trying several methods. I think stacking pieces that leave gaps like palm leaves and slopes isn't helpful, because the gaps in between the pieces is really hard to fill with other pieces. You could have done a slightly better job by fitting in a bunch of the smaller tiles in between the palm leaves. Also you waste a lot of space by stacking the plates with an offset. Stacking plates directly on top of each other is more space efficient, though it will be more annoying and time consuming to disassemble.
Right, I believe that stacking plates directly on top is not good for pick a brick because they are all fresh pieces and so you’re going to have to either have a grip of steel to get them off or ruin them by using other methods so in my mind, not worth it and therefore not an option. BUT you’re right, they would’ve conserved on space if I did it that way
Very helpful, thanks for sharing! So given that stacking 1x3 bricks is better than just chugging them in and the opposite is true for smaller parts with awkward shapes, I wonder about the following experiment: what would happen if you took two full cups, one with the neatly stacked 1x3s and one full of small parts, then took half of each, mixed that up and re-fill the cups (without stacking) with the mixed contents? I expect that you would be able to fill both of them up with very few leftover pieces. If this is true you could save a lot of time at the store by not stacking bricks and instead just alternating between bricks as much as possible when filling the cups.
Sometimes doing fill a brick would take hours to fill perfectly. I have no Lego store close, but an independent store has very small cups for 8 and 15 with new and used pieces all mixed. But, I did find a lot of cool printed pieces and other interesting Legos. No minifigs. Those were $5 each build your own.
Thank you. Regarding time, and such, I'll stick to shaking it, as I would be out way faster, and could experience other things, and or just work a bit and not spend 1 hour more just to get 60 pieces more. My time is more worth it than that. Thanks for showing it though
So I go to the Lego Flagship store in Rockefeller Center, and they have boxes. Still, using your techniques, I got an absolutely packed box, that even emptied out one of the bins!!! Saved EASILY $50 on bricks probably a lot more. Came home, in a $10 box just shocked at the weight of it. 250gs of bricks. Insane
hi aways pack them in like you do this why the prices have gone up i was doing 14 cups one x mas now watford shop in the uk is no more i will not buy alot any more as train fairs are not great like they were london has 3 lego shops
I don't think we have to be concerned about Lego losing money. The family who owns the company is worth many millions, and they're not losing money on anything. And you don't have unlimited time to stack your bricks evenly in the cup. How much do they charge in US dollars per cup?
It’s generally small cup $8.99 and large cup $15.99 and takes 50¢ off if you bring your own cup. It varies based on region though in America. I’ve bought large cups for $14 before and as much as $18.
Well lego is obviously not losing money on it😁 1 kilo of the plastic Lego use cost 4,5$ and there is obviously not 3,8 kilos of Lego bricks in that 16.99$ cup🧐🤨 Lego Also has to mild Them and ship the Lego out But that Will stil amount to around 2,6 kilo of Lego for Them to lose money on a 16,99$ cup soooo… I really like the rest of the vid tho🤟👍👍👏👏👏😊😆
Maybe. All I know is that when I asked a LEGO employee about it they said it’s the only thing LEGO does in which they lose money. Granted, I asked that a while ago so it could have changed.
@@SawyerStudios that has nothing to do with the metrics of time vs profit. That is something a low IQ person says that they think makes sense but it doesn't at all
@@marcuscostello5635 I think time over Profit is applicable when time is wasted. More time for better profit versus less time for worse profit. You’d have to measure how much time is spent in direct correlation to the profit. How much extra time does it really take to do one or the other? Also, if you are multi-tasking, say, I would’ve spent the same amount of time at the LEGO store if I piled the bricks into a cup and talking to employees versus meticulously placing bricks into the cup while talking to employees. Then the time is equivalent. But even if it’s two more minutes, is it really not worth it being in the store for two more minutes?
@@SawyerStudios depends on the brick's value the amount of time and the amount of that brick. All the other nonsense you are saying about talking to employees is irrelevant
@@marcuscostello5635 my point of bringing up talking with employees isn’t specifically about the equation of time vs profit so yes I agree, however I was talking about outside factors because businesses don’t only take time and profit into consideration when making a decision. Factors that contribute to the worth of doing this or not is stuff like: schedule, estimated spent time in LEGO store with and without doing it, likelihood of seeing someone you know to prolong the time, are you going with a friend, is this an all day event, is this in the context of stopping by briefly, etc. you would never make a decision solely based off of time vs profit measurements.
I think if you've got a variety of sizes, it's best to alternate putting them in. Every time you add in bigger pieces, gaps will form between them. Putting in smaller pieces to fill in these gaps will use up all the space. Keep alternating all the way up and you should end up with a dense cup.
This is what I do. Don’t wanna sit there all day meticulously putting in bricks one by one
If Lego was losing money at "Pick a Brick" they would stop doing it.
because few people take the effort to fill the cup completely around. of 1*3 lego in total of 240 additionally, bring a cup for a discount. Most often, users simply scoop lego or handfuls at a time while purchasing a fresh cup each time at 100-140 lego. don't forget to factor in the different and odds side lego.
@@kaboomwinn4026 Also he cost of making a brick/piece is significantly lower than average pice you would pay at the store (or resell sites like bricklink)
@@kaboomwinn4026 what he said. People don't spend time with it. They chuck it and this it being opposite effect and being more expensive so lego gains money in that situation
@@LooneyLunatic21 :)
It also doesn't cost lego 10 cents a brick to manufacture. That price for sets includes designers time making the set great which isn't needed for pick a brick
I remember when I was 11 I went to Legoland in NYC and grabbed a cup and started selecting pieces and my dad made me put it back because “You can just do that online for cheaper.”
Biggest regret ever. I can’t even get into Lego in NYC anymore because the number of tourists has tripled! Last I got in some lady kept ramming me with her stroller and the pick a brick wall had a 2 hour wait!
That’s so unfortunate… I’ve heard NYC is a pain to navigate LEGO-wise.
Leave nyc bro
I always like to make a big 4x4 tower of bricks in the middle up to the top and fill around with whatever piece available. thanks for sharing!
Thank you for taking the time for trying several methods. I think stacking pieces that leave gaps like palm leaves and slopes isn't helpful, because the gaps in between the pieces is really hard to fill with other pieces. You could have done a slightly better job by fitting in a bunch of the smaller tiles in between the palm leaves. Also you waste a lot of space by stacking the plates with an offset. Stacking plates directly on top of each other is more space efficient, though it will be more annoying and time consuming to disassemble.
Right, I believe that stacking plates directly on top is not good for pick a brick because they are all fresh pieces and so you’re going to have to either have a grip of steel to get them off or ruin them by using other methods so in my mind, not worth it and therefore not an option. BUT you’re right, they would’ve conserved on space if I did it that way
Very helpful, thanks for sharing! So given that stacking 1x3 bricks is better than just chugging them in and the opposite is true for smaller parts with awkward shapes, I wonder about the following experiment: what would happen if you took two full cups, one with the neatly stacked 1x3s and one full of small parts, then took half of each, mixed that up and re-fill the cups (without stacking) with the mixed contents? I expect that you would be able to fill both of them up with very few leftover pieces. If this is true you could save a lot of time at the store by not stacking bricks and instead just alternating between bricks as much as possible when filling the cups.
That is an interesting experiment, one I might have to do soon
@@SawyerStudios I would love to see that (if I don't try it myself first, but I'll have to see what the local store has to offer).
In the name of science! Very good job, and essential research, as I am going to the Lego store today!
Sometimes doing fill a brick would take hours to fill perfectly. I have no Lego store close, but an independent store has very small cups for 8 and 15 with new and used pieces all mixed. But, I did find a lot of cool printed pieces and other interesting Legos. No minifigs. Those were $5 each build your own.
Seems like it's best to build a central column of solid bricks, then fill in the gaps with miscellaneous pieces
Thank you. Regarding time, and such, I'll stick to shaking it, as I would be out way faster, and could experience other things, and or just work a bit and not spend 1 hour more just to get 60 pieces more. My time is more worth it than that. Thanks for showing it though
So I go to the Lego Flagship store in Rockefeller Center, and they have boxes. Still, using your techniques, I got an absolutely packed box, that even emptied out one of the bins!!! Saved EASILY $50 on bricks probably a lot more. Came home, in a $10 box just shocked at the weight of it. 250gs of bricks. Insane
That’s insane!!!! Awesome story!
thanks for the insight! I'm always stacking but I guess from now on I'll change a bit haha
I don’t think LEGO Loses money but they definitely don’t gain a lot from this.
Update with the new pab boxes?
It’s funny, none of the stores near me have made the switch over yet 😂😂 as soon as I get my hands on one though!
hi aways pack them in like you do this why the prices have gone up i was doing 14 cups one x mas now watford shop in the uk is no more i will not buy alot any more
as train fairs are not great like they were london has 3 lego shops
Wait can u get each piece like 1 in one cup from pick a brick or one of evrything
Yes, you can mix and match whatever you’d like with pick a brick.
I don't think we have to be concerned about Lego losing money. The family who owns the company is worth many millions, and they're not losing money on anything. And you don't have unlimited time to stack your bricks evenly in the cup.
How much do they charge in US dollars per cup?
It’s generally small cup $8.99 and large cup $15.99 and takes 50¢ off if you bring your own cup. It varies based on region though in America. I’ve bought large cups for $14 before and as much as $18.
If you’re paying 100 for bulk manufactured plastic, I’m pretty sure there’s no way they are losing money.
I agree. In a later video I explain how I was mistaken but yes, you are correct.
Well lego is obviously not losing money on it😁 1 kilo of the plastic Lego use cost 4,5$ and there is obviously not 3,8 kilos of Lego bricks in that 16.99$ cup🧐🤨 Lego Also has to mild Them and ship the Lego out But that Will stil amount to around 2,6 kilo of Lego for Them to lose money on a 16,99$ cup soooo…
I really like the rest of the vid tho🤟👍👍👏👏👏😊😆
Maybe. All I know is that when I asked a LEGO employee about it they said it’s the only thing LEGO does in which they lose money. Granted, I asked that a while ago so it could have changed.
Good info
I think ull save alot of money doing this but not against the time u spend doing it
I think it makes it worth it when you’re friends with the employees and so you can catch up with them as you do it.
@@SawyerStudios that has nothing to do with the metrics of time vs profit. That is something a low IQ person says that they think makes sense but it doesn't at all
@@marcuscostello5635 I think time over Profit is applicable when time is wasted. More time for better profit versus less time for worse profit. You’d have to measure how much time is spent in direct correlation to the profit. How much extra time does it really take to do one or the other? Also, if you are multi-tasking, say, I would’ve spent the same amount of time at the LEGO store if I piled the bricks into a cup and talking to employees versus meticulously placing bricks into the cup while talking to employees. Then the time is equivalent. But even if it’s two more minutes, is it really not worth it being in the store for two more minutes?
@@SawyerStudios depends on the brick's value the amount of time and the amount of that brick. All the other nonsense you are saying about talking to employees is irrelevant
@@marcuscostello5635 my point of bringing up talking with employees isn’t specifically about the equation of time vs profit so yes I agree, however I was talking about outside factors because businesses don’t only take time and profit into consideration when making a decision. Factors that contribute to the worth of doing this or not is stuff like: schedule, estimated spent time in LEGO store with and without doing it, likelihood of seeing someone you know to prolong the time, are you going with a friend, is this an all day event, is this in the context of stopping by briefly, etc. you would never make a decision solely based off of time vs profit measurements.
In my country is 20usd a cup :( maybe lego isn't loosing money
Sorry, I can't speak English.but...我非常喜歡你這支影片，對新手的我來說，帶來了極大幫助！希望可以看到你的更多分享🧐🤩
感謝您的收看
wow great video man !! Like and sub go to you!!