It's exciting to see enthusiasm for the evolution of electric aircraft technology! Your point about the relative cleanliness of electric power compared to kerosene is an important part of the conversation about sustainable aviation. While electric aircraft currently face challenges like battery weight and range limitations, advancements in this field could lead to significant reductions in aviation's carbon footprint. It's a hopeful sign for the future of environmentally conscious travel. The transition to electric power in aviation, as in other sectors, is a complex process but one that holds great potential for creating a cleaner, more sustainable world.
@@Interestingengineeringofficial All it's gonna take is one more big advancement in battery tech and I think we'll be on our way. All the naysayers will have to eat their words overnight.
Absolutely, envisioning a future where electric planes like these are used for short, inter-city travel is both exciting and realistic. Their current range limitations make them ideal for shorter trips, potentially transforming regional travel by offering a faster, eco-friendlier alternative to traditional road or rail transport. This could significantly reduce travel times between cities and alleviate congestion on roads and railways. As technology progresses, we might see these electric aircraft becoming a common and efficient choice for short-haul travel, opening up new possibilities in how we move between cities.
You are right, for as long as they store electricity in heavy batteries - nothing really will change. I simply can't believe they are still doing this nonsense.
I like knowing that if it runs out of battery it still has a glide ratio instead of falling like a rock. Chance of survival seems much much higher than no wing type evtols.
No power equals no control - vectoring thrust is great until there is no thrust (and the solidity of the fans if stopped makes them airbrakes - glide ratio of a brick .
Creo que si es un vehículo híbrido, con un turbohélice en la cola, que propulsara y según la necesidad, recargase las baterías, dejando a estas para los aterrizajes y despegues así como la aproxinación a zonas urbanas, sería la aeronave perfecta.
Lilium is the most superior electric engineering of our life times. It's the only eVTOL designed to scale up commercially. Eventually we will see anything from 60-200 passenger commercial flights. It's going to interrupt air travel as we know it.
Even if the range is only 50 km that's good enough for taxi service. the airport to the CBD, I think the current goal is 300 km range which is too heavy,. The best application currently is short range taxi service for high-powered executives, wouldn't be hard to make $2,000 a day on this vehicle as a taxi.... I first became aware of this vehicle seven years ago ....still not in mass production which is really disappointing it should have been done by now
All in all, having money is gooood!!! I want to fly in one but my salary is side-eyeing me. Great innovation btw. The planet needs it. Hopefully, Taylor Swift can get one with all the emissions her plane is leaving on the planet
The Lilium Jet's eco-friendly approach is definitely a step in the right direction for sustainable travel. Here's to a future where such innovations become more accessible for everyone!
That's an interesting comparison! It highlights how different aircraft serve different purposes and markets. The Lilium Jet, with its advanced electric VTOL technology, represents a leap in aviation innovation, catering to a niche market that prioritizes sustainability and modern design. On the other hand, the Cessna 172, a tried and true workhorse of the skies, offers greater range and affordability. Both have their unique advantages and appeal to different segments of the aviation community.
Your perspective as a pilot adds valuable insight to this discussion. It's important to acknowledge the complexities and challenges in the quest for greener technologies. While electric aircraft and cars represent a shift away from fossil fuels, there are indeed concerns regarding their overall environmental impact, including battery production and electricity sourcing. It's a reminder that the path to truly sustainable solutions is multifaceted and requires addressing various environmental aspects, not just the immediate emissions. Your analogy strikingly points out that 'green' technology is not a simple black and white issue, but rather a spectrum where continuous improvement is essential.
Can you imagine the number of idiots that would take to the air, and how we would go out in fear of being hit by falling vehicles. It is bad enough on the roads, and even down to pavements, now to look to the air.
Indeed, the prospect of widespread personal air vehicles does raise significant concerns about safety and traffic management. While the idea of flying cars sounds thrilling, the practicality of it in terms of regulation, pilot training, and the potential for accidents is a complex issue. The current challenges we face with road traffic and pedestrian safety give us a glimpse of the complexities involved. However, with advancing technology and proper regulatory frameworks, it's possible that these concerns could be addressed in the future. For now, it remains a fascinating concept that requires careful consideration and planning.
@@Interestingengineeringofficial The rate of increase in battery tech has already peaked a while ago so it will take a decades at current increases to get anywhere close, and that's assuming that there are no physical limits which there obviously are.
While it might seem disappointing at the moment, it's important to remember that many groundbreaking innovations and technologies didn't achieve success overnight. Sometimes, what appears to be a flop initially can pave the way for significant improvements and breakthroughs in the future. It's often through trial, error, and continuous refinement that great ideas eventually find their footing and make a lasting impact.
No a good battery capacity , and posibble range was given in the vodeo... How many hours. And how far it can travel were not given here.. one big problem I would.say have not been overcome yet ..is the resistance to cold or very low temperatures..Tesla just show us this. Year how unreliable the batteries can be under extreme cold temperatures ..I would like they. Can get a. Solution to that problem..and to possible fires.
now load it up with people, a serious battery pack and the structural integrity required by the aviation industry and let's see if it can take off. This is nothing to talk about it having to survive the rigors of testing.
⚙ Want to know more about the latest tech and innovations? Don’t Miss Out!
*SUBSCRIBE & HIT THE BELL* 👉bit.ly/SubscribeNowIE
Thank you, Interesting Engineering for covering our groundbreaking proprietary technology, that will redefine the skies. 🛩🔋
I buy Lilium Shares, this will Fly!!!
Gamechanger Lilium!
Definitely.
I really hope this is the first of many electric aircraft. Anyone who thinks kerosene is cleaner than electricity needs to have an MRI ASAP...
😂
Just remember to wear your tin helmet to protect you from the falling parts as vehicle crashes into vehicle
It's exciting to see enthusiasm for the evolution of electric aircraft technology! Your point about the relative cleanliness of electric power compared to kerosene is an important part of the conversation about sustainable aviation. While electric aircraft currently face challenges like battery weight and range limitations, advancements in this field could lead to significant reductions in aviation's carbon footprint. It's a hopeful sign for the future of environmentally conscious travel. The transition to electric power in aviation, as in other sectors, is a complex process but one that holds great potential for creating a cleaner, more sustainable world.
@@Interestingengineeringofficial All it's gonna take is one more big advancement in battery tech and I think we'll be on our way. All the naysayers will have to eat their words overnight.
Great video.
Thank you.
This documentary was so my type ... i love it ❤
Thank you.
So we can think of a future where these type of planes can be used for inter city travels, since they won't travel much longer distances.
Absolutely, envisioning a future where electric planes like these are used for short, inter-city travel is both exciting and realistic. Their current range limitations make them ideal for shorter trips, potentially transforming regional travel by offering a faster, eco-friendlier alternative to traditional road or rail transport. This could significantly reduce travel times between cities and alleviate congestion on roads and railways. As technology progresses, we might see these electric aircraft becoming a common and efficient choice for short-haul travel, opening up new possibilities in how we move between cities.
You're wrong. This design is capable of scaling up to multiple passengers & longer distances. It's the only evtol capable of that
@@EarthCreature.😂
You are right, for as long as they store electricity in heavy batteries - nothing really will change.
I simply can't believe they are still doing this nonsense.
@gpaull2 Yep it's clear you're a half wit.
Excellent 👌👌
This could be very useful for islands like The Maldives 🇲🇻 and Greece 🇬🇷
Right, also Philippines, Caraibic, etc.
This is the space X of future air mobility...lilium jet looks dope.....cool as fk. 👍
I like knowing that if it runs out of battery it still has a glide ratio instead of falling like a rock. Chance of survival seems much much higher than no wing type evtols.
No power equals no control - vectoring thrust is great until there is no thrust (and the solidity of the fans if stopped makes them airbrakes - glide ratio of a brick .
Ill take some wings vs none. It would be a great test to do for sure. Could be the difference between living and dying…
wow this is amazing
Thank you.
Creo que si es un vehículo híbrido, con un turbohélice en la cola, que propulsara y según la necesidad, recargase las baterías, dejando a estas para los aterrizajes y despegues así como la aproxinación a zonas urbanas, sería la aeronave perfecta.
Lilium is the most superior electric engineering of our life times. It's the only eVTOL designed to scale up commercially. Eventually we will see anything from 60-200 passenger commercial flights. It's going to interrupt air travel as we know it.
I’ve got a bridge for sale…
Even if the range is only 50 km that's good enough for taxi service. the airport to the CBD, I think the current goal is 300 km range which is too heavy,. The best application currently is short range taxi service for high-powered executives, wouldn't be hard to make $2,000 a day on this vehicle as a taxi.... I first became aware of this vehicle seven years ago ....still not in mass production which is really disappointing it should have been done by now
Lilium will be delisted on nasdaq
Problem is its extortionate price of $10m each. Must have highly automated manufacture in volume to bring this down by 90%.
What about bird strike
Price ??
All in all, having money is gooood!!! I want to fly in one but my salary is side-eyeing me. Great innovation btw. The planet needs it. Hopefully, Taylor Swift can get one with all the emissions her plane is leaving on the planet
The Lilium Jet's eco-friendly approach is definitely a step in the right direction for sustainable travel. Here's to a future where such innovations become more accessible for everyone!
let me know when you can do $100k flying cars :P
Lilium Jet: Range: 160NM. Price: $10MM -- 1960 CESSNA 172A: Range 420NM. Price: $50K Just sayin.....
That's an interesting comparison! It highlights how different aircraft serve different purposes and markets. The Lilium Jet, with its advanced electric VTOL technology, represents a leap in aviation innovation, catering to a niche market that prioritizes sustainability and modern design. On the other hand, the Cessna 172, a tried and true workhorse of the skies, offers greater range and affordability. Both have their unique advantages and appeal to different segments of the aviation community.
$50k for a 172 😂 not even
Yeah but you can’t land your 172 in a roof 😂
@@jamesengland7461 you’re right. The listing I looked at before original comment just sold for $44.5K. I’m saying close enough.
From a pilot:
Electric aircraft and cars are as a "Green" as arsenic.
Your perspective as a pilot adds valuable insight to this discussion. It's important to acknowledge the complexities and challenges in the quest for greener technologies. While electric aircraft and cars represent a shift away from fossil fuels, there are indeed concerns regarding their overall environmental impact, including battery production and electricity sourcing. It's a reminder that the path to truly sustainable solutions is multifaceted and requires addressing various environmental aspects, not just the immediate emissions. Your analogy strikingly points out that 'green' technology is not a simple black and white issue, but rather a spectrum where continuous improvement is essential.
Is this a paid commercial?!
Cool but in Africa we fair behen
Get ahead then.
Can you imagine the number of idiots that would take to the air, and how we would go out in fear of being hit by falling vehicles. It is bad enough on the roads, and even down to pavements, now to look to the air.
Indeed, the prospect of widespread personal air vehicles does raise significant concerns about safety and traffic management. While the idea of flying cars sounds thrilling, the practicality of it in terms of regulation, pilot training, and the potential for accidents is a complex issue. The current challenges we face with road traffic and pedestrian safety give us a glimpse of the complexities involved. However, with advancing technology and proper regulatory frameworks, it's possible that these concerns could be addressed in the future. For now, it remains a fascinating concept that requires careful consideration and planning.
It's not intended to be sold to the public. It will be used commercially and we all know it's the future of travel.
@@mtailor5529 Not as yet, but given time we shall see monies change hands, as is the way of the world
Just a company commercial
Cool toy, but without a 10x increase in energy density and energy per kg it is not going to fly a meaningful distance.
True, energy density is crucial for longer flights, but with advancements in battery technology, we're hopeful for what the future holds!
300 km isnt enough? YOU TROLLS...
@@Interestingengineeringofficial The rate of increase in battery tech has already peaked a while ago so it will take a decades at current increases to get anywhere close, and that's assuming that there are no physical limits which there obviously are.
It would not last five minutes with the idiots we have in cars. Give them an air craft and that will finish us
It's a flop.
It hasnt been released. How can it? LOL YOU TROLLS...
ever seen a vertical takeoff that makes it possible ?? u just proved your own dumbness 😅
While it might seem disappointing at the moment, it's important to remember that many groundbreaking innovations and technologies didn't achieve success overnight. Sometimes, what appears to be a flop initially can pave the way for significant improvements and breakthroughs in the future. It's often through trial, error, and continuous refinement that great ideas eventually find their footing and make a lasting impact.
@@JoeyBlogs007 lets see how your comment will age......
No a good battery capacity , and posibble range was given in the vodeo... How many hours. And how far it can travel were not given here..
one big problem I would.say have not been overcome yet ..is the resistance to cold or very low temperatures..Tesla just show us this. Year how unreliable the batteries can be under extreme cold temperatures ..I would like they. Can get a. Solution to that problem..and to possible fires.
now load it up with people, a serious battery pack and the structural integrity required by the aviation industry and let's see if it can take off. This is nothing to talk about it having to survive the rigors of testing.