Iya nanti kita Akan Buat Banyak Dengan Modal IMF Perusahaan Indostri Perekonomian ekonomi Keuangan Bursa saham Efek Keungan Ekonomi Uang Dan Perusahaan IMF Bank Modal Dunia Saya oke !!. tapi jenis Sekarang Tolong Simpan Satu Untuk saya Untuk saya Kasih Ke Keluarga Saya ,untuk ia Gunakan ,Selain juga ia Promosi Pertama Pemakaian Di Provinsi Palangkaraya Kecamatan Dadahup Kalimatan Tengah Indonesia oke !! Sual Strip Sosialisasi Coming Dek bisa Saya dan anda Rundingkan .BY .Saya Franki \ Pran 👑 Pollpran King of the king Dim Muda baru \ Presiden Besar tertinggi dunia Baru Amerika \ PBB 🌐 Pemimpin Dunia Perserikatan Bangsa Bangsa: ( Petualang Penomenal Gitar 🎸 Heroes InasPer \ Tour Keliling dunia Pertujukan 2000 Negara Bangsa Bangsa Dunia 🌏🌎🌍🤟🇮🇩
@@yvangenesse1649 that thing seems like it certainly could, and that could be problematic in the real world. the g forces too, this thing looks like it can move a lot of air.
I was thinking that myself. I think visually it is cooler looking than any of the Star Wars Racers that Young Vader flew in. I only saw part of that movie; he watched the race or was in the race...not sure which one. Anyway this is cooler than any of those Star Wars concept vehicles. However the cool look while it would be really popular with people who like Blade Runner or Sci Fi, that look would mean the inside the passenger area would be cramped; people still would buy this version even knowing it is cramped, but the practical consumer would want more room.
@@tippedjungle I genuinely doubt it, as it's just plain impractical on what ends up feeling like an infinite number of levels, but it looks cool in movies, and is perfect for Dubai's fake economy.
@all4espi have you not seen the single person drone vehicles? Impractical? Why? Ofcourse something like this will become commercially viable.. I'm sure people thought the same about the aeroplane until the wright brothers built and flew one. Future technology is not beyond our capacity to believe it in some cases it is because we have no way of knowing. But this is going to be a reality maybe in our lifetime. Just you wait and see
Its a matter of energy economy. A fixed wing aircraft is a very energy cheap way to get stuff off the ground. This thing .. I wouldn't be surprised if it's $10k per hour to lift just one guy.
@@tippedjungle As an engineer, I can list off so many reasons why, but none of those reasons matter, as the laws of thermodynamics cut them off at the pass. A steampunk world with helium or hydrogen filled balloons and human powered propellers and rudders would be more practrical than any kind of heavier than air craft that relies on pushing the air down faster than it would otherwise fall. And lets not ignore the elephant in the room - the noise pollution caused by all those idiotic oversized drones hovering around. There is no commercial viability whatsoever, and it is impractical on all levels. It's just dumb.
Thing is. Making flying cars is relatively easy. We’ve been conceptualising the idea since the 1980’s. Some people even made em. The problem isn’t making a car fly. But making it safe. Car crashes are very common. But on the ground you have physical barriers that stop most from flying off and hitting someone’s house. Or populated buildings. But if every car was flying. You’ll have a thousand flying metal projectiles wizzing around everyone’s head all the time
We could bypass this by having emergency backup power that's used for emergency landing in the event of accidents, hazards, or battery dropping below a certain percentage. If the onboard computer could calculate the distance and time it would take to reach a destination while accounting for potential variables, efficiently reserving power would be much more possible. The questions then become how do we achieve this and how many variables should be counted for this to be even viable? Worse, how do we land safely if the chassis and or onboard flight system has been compromised due to hazards or accidents? I haven't even addressed the current constraints with battery capacity and charging. I could see this taking decades to solve.
Scaled down model, they've had flying RC drones for many years. If they can get this FAA approved, could be another was of transportation. It isn't gonna be cheap like the price of an uber though.
@Fuzzled369 I feel like you didn't even read the comment. I don't know why people wake up and choose chaos... Okay. They're testing it on sports first. Hooray! Congrats to them! But it's not a full scale... which was my point... so what's your point? What exactly are you burning me on and giggling like a schoolgirl about?
yea and people dont understand that if the flying car was so great it wouldnt come up every ten or so years as a "NEW TECHNOLOGY" and then dissapear again
@@cheese3024ngl at how fast technology is advancing rn i feel like i can get myself a little bit hyped about stuff like this since it may actually become reality. I would LOVE to see flying car races first for like the first 10 years or do, and if they decide to allow ppl to drive them around they should only allow experienced and trusted drivers
For anyone wondering, the company name is Bellwether Industries. A London-based Taiwan company. The 'flying car' model name is Volar. It uses 4 ducted fans as propulsion.
I'll just put it on my wish list of this is never going to happen. just below elio motors (trike car)... if I live to be 100 years old, this is just a pipe dream in real time. It's just never going to be real. And probably too expensive for rich people, let alone general population..
@ComdrStew Their not going to have a bunch of idiots flying above raining down on people. Besides it wouldn't even be affordable for the average person.
@@josephallen8044 I agree with the idiot drivers part yes, but if flying cars came to market then that I would think eventually they would become affordable similar to how cars evolved from being something only for wealthy people to then becoming common place like today.
Only way I can see this working is by having pilots operating them like ubers or private jets. Won't be available to the mass until AI is good enough to completely take over like in bladerunner
Thats what they said before the Wright Brothers flight. If this is like standing next to warp drive then I guess we warp drives since I know of one flying car you can actually buy for over $75k.
@@brianawilk285 Except it was easy to build a model and test it independently, There were gliders and airships, it was only a mater of time, really days or weeks before someone else beat the wright bros. This fantasy model is just that, fantasy.
Moller's vehicle worked! His rotary engine works. His idea is valid but his business sense not so much. There is an interview with him on RUclips explaining how it all went wrong.
@@jamesvertrees5857 if it was only 'business sense' that was lacking, then somebody else would have picked up the idea and ran with it. But unfortunately the idea itself was the problem.
@@chriscampbell4857 The idea is not the problem. A generator powered by a wankel engine using energy dense fuel to have greater range is what some drones use now. The idea is solid because the math supports it and it is validated by many engineers using same concept in their designs. The Bellwether EVTOL uses many lifting surfaces in its design to take some of the load off the engines. Many drones uses this concept. I believe Moller has the right idea in using highly efficient engines to generate the power for the fans. New designs in vane shapes can increase lift and quiet the noise. Technology is always advancing but for a project to be successful the math must work. Bellwether has a design where the math works. Moller's idea worked. It was his business sense that ultimately was the problem along with skeptics with little imagination. The hybrid approach is becoming more popular in the drone biz just like Moller predicted because the math works.
Agree, Hoovering is more pratical and safer. We dont need to go hundred or thousday of feet in to air, we can just made wide strecth of land that isnt dusty for car to slightly hover over. Flying cars will need designated space and air to fly over anyways, why not just make some wider strecth of land for cars to hoover over.
3:50 is the model hovering by its own power (with safety tether) for those wondering if it's just a model. They have tested it flying as model scale, which how all the current rideable drones in production started.
Did you see the model? It is covered in delta wing shapes, ie lifting surfaces with forward flight. It will work. The question is will it be commercially viable.
Regulations certainly would take a big part in that happening, although research and development can be much faster now vs the past 20 years, such things tend to slow based on funding the projects, but the technology is here
I would say probably say in a slightly shorter time due to the people working on projects involved in EV flight. The problem is power for these concepts. It certainly needs a big leap in battery tech for it to be viable. Most are only any good for 20 minutes flight time. The first company to crack flight time will corner the market.
Yep, this is worst than concept cars. At least Concept cars are full size actual working models, here this thing is all lame Animation or a Small RC drone. Can we say Cheap Click Bait???
@@57HarleyDavidson Concept cars are real working cars that never make it to market, this as a concept isn't even full sized yet, it's just a toy at this point
It's a fancy looking quad copter that won't be able to achieve very dynamic flight capabilities specifically because it uses small ducted fans instead of open rotors, all to achieve a futurist aesthetic. The point of having coaxial props is to have redundancy incase of motor or propeller failure in one corner. Without redundancy, a failure in one corner will cause the craft to plummet into the earth.
Finally looking like someone took a proper step towards the future of hovering/flying cars!! Instead of open propellers they enclosed it to pressure the air only downwards, just like thrusters! Well done and hoping for best.
So apparently, if it applies air pressure downwards, it needs speed and it needs to be continuesly moving forward to fly upwards?, this will need alot of artificial thrusters when parking and slowing down to avoid damage, and it would require a whole lot more energy or gas
I love this. I’m very excited to an actual hover car be made for society. As a business man that lives near the city and is looking to eventually move to the city, a hover car will definitely come in handy, especially if it can seat 5 people. I’m also looking forward to watching sports leagues that will be racing these vehicles. That is so cool. This is another good way to introduce how cool this kind of car will be. I look forward to building this car in the future, and being able to see different design concepts and suv versions of this vehicle.
I designed one just like it but left out unnecessary body panels. I had 2 enclosed propellers in the rear using on an outer pivot system, so the motor is fixed separately and the maneuvering is done moving the enclosure. On the front a single larger enclosed propeller on the same set up. 3 all together to stablalize and maneuver good while reducing the demand 4 motors would draw. The center cabin could seat four or two and cargo. I dont think we will be able to accommodate larger designs with the volume taken from possible roads or landing areas. It would exceed lane and parking widths to do more. Their design would be controlled by wind easier an operate against more resistance with more weight. Mine would be the egg shape to reduce drag by simply not having the fancy looking wing body panels.
Smaller propellers / impellers at higher rpm also mean higher disc loading and less efficiency. With those very minimal lifting surfaces, I cannot imagine it to be very efficient.
Exaclty. its click bait at the moment. That probably why its only a small RC size scale. Its not true legit fully car until its full size, can carry atleast 2 grown adults + some extra weith for at least 100 miles
Just use more? I'm not worried about the speed but the battery. How far can you drive/fly this before it goes down. 18-100km for an hour at 80km/h would be awesome 😎
@@AndroidFerret You cannot just add more batteries as more batteries mean more weight. Eventually, you get diminishing returns. At this point, no matter how many batteries you add, the range won't increase.
To come to market is one thing, for people to buy these as it stands they will have to have a pilot's licence. There's only a few people that are wealthy enough with a pilot's licence that would be able to lease one of these never mind buy because the price tag will probably be about a million bucks if not more. And of these people only a few will even bother more than once, it's a very limited market. To sell these and be viable you have to sell to the greater populace so it would have to be cheap and reliable, and the government would have to approve it. Let's look at self-driving, Tesla's cars can all self-drive, you're not supposed to but the software is there. The reason it hasn't been legally deployed is that Tesla can't meet the safety standards required, the AI software will run over obstacles, make incorrect analysis of what it sees. Several stories of cars doing the incorrect actions. Elon keeps saying ext year but for all these self-driving cars in the works none are remotely close in the final analysis Now apply all of that data to average people driving in a city. As it is right now, they'll need a pilot's licence and log hours until qualified to fly one of these, perhaps 500 to a thousand hours in a real plane and then one of these hover cars but not on the road. Then there comes traffic control systems like stop lights and whatnot because you know people will just fly between buildings and won't see the cross traffic. These things count in terms of one of these things being able to be sold, because there will need to be MASSIVE infrastructure changes to incorporate these into a city environment Making these things a reality will cost time and effort to even remotely get off the ground.
4:59-5:03 Look at this shit! The flying "The Matrix" hovercrafts are becoming a reality, so does A.I. too! I guess after 100 years later human-machine war and enslavement of humanity in the computer system called "The Matrix" can be a reality as well!
It's a real shame an expert like you isn't working for the team that has designed and built this - they'd have saved so much time and effort with this input.
This is basically like a giant wingsuit that can lift off from a standstill. Love the concept. Personally, I've always wanted to see something like this with wheels that can drive and lift off from a runway.
They could have made the flight mode more efficient if they had used a lifting body design. I love how it looks, but I would also love to see the lifting body concept included to help save energy during flight.
Even empty you can see the instability and wild pitching corrections necessary to hold hover position. He makes a point of shooting down large rotors and such but it is those large lifting configurations that yield stability they are lacking. Looks like we have another Moler sky car to watch...
There have been flying cars for decades. The biggest issue with bringing them to market is the licenses needed to operate and the vehicle has to meet both FAA and standard automobile regulations. Which changes often and puts the designers back to the drawing board.
Yeah nobody dies in F1 or nascar or anything either you're right... people definitely dont still do those regardless of the threat of death. Oh and base jumping AND skydiving. Way too dangerous... tf out bitch lmao
I think it's in the stage of development, right now it's mostly stimulated through computers, it hasn't been picked up by any brand, but they could give it a model name 😅😅
All companies that manufacture flying vehicles or drones must demonstrate what this vehicle can do in the event of an incident or accidental roll or rollover due to a machine error, human error or even a natural calamity such as a sudden increase in wind, what emergency actions a pilot will do and what it looks like while having a problem in the air and see what will happen in what maneuver the pilot will do or does.
Is anyone else just dying to know the obvious question or is it just me, they seemed to be very careful not to talk about what actually powers this thing or show any details of the underside wherein lies the secret I'm sure - is it EDF, DF, DP or anti gravity?
It's a good idea to put it in sports first since it'll be the perfect area to test for any needed upgrades and design modifications. I'd hate to see things falling out of the sky because of a malfunction or a news saying someone hacked the navigation and made these "flying cars" rockets for some terrorist organization.
@@abcxyz6606 Covering any blades add weight and reduces airflow, helicopter blades are above peoples heads at a safe distance so no need to cover them.
@@abcxyz6606 Answer is yes. A few jets were designed to lift off in hover mode, they're called VTOL's (Vertical TakeOff and Landing), one of which is called the Harrier
I don’t know how to tell you this, but there have been several flying cars built since 1917. Not all of them flew ofcourse, specially the first few attempts but lately there have been serious attempts at making flying cars commercially viable.
Is that a Click Bait Large RC?? There are Tons of RC plane/cars already. Don't try to claim it a legit flying car until its a full functional Size, can carry at least two grown adults, plus some luggage, for at least 100 miles plus of range in air, and 200 miles on road.
Wow! This looks really cool. The only problem is, people already have a serious problem with driving on the road, so I really don't trust people with a flying car.
I always see people say this and never understand what they mean. Roads are finite areas typically rife with hazards all around ( medians, telephone poles, street lights, construction crews etc.) not to mention other vehicles in close proximity at all times, and are prone to external conditions like weather (freezing, flooding, cracking etc.) and have to be maintained consistently for optimal efficiency/safety so it would make sense accidents are commonplace when there are so many variables. Wouldn’t it actually be much easier to navigate and maintain safety when you have the entirety of the atmosphere to escape to in a dangerous situation. Less costly to maintain air travel as well (virtually no cost whatsoever aside from maybe some guidance systems) Think how rare it is to hear about or witness two planes or helicopters or really any aerial vehicles crashing into each other vs how often it happens with vehicles. This is due to the inherent differences between the two travel modes. I think sky travel would be way safer as long as we had dependable vehicles and established altitude limits keeping you from risk of interrupting planes or crashing into skyscrapers.
This vehicle is all show and no go! It is just a quad copter with the prop motors hidden inside, with air fed to the prop motors via ducts in the top of the body. Unfortunately the fancy looking ducts block free flow to the prop motors and reduce the thrust and efficiency, which will give it poor range and will make it loud. The prop motors do not tilt, and in order to move forward, the entire vehicle has to tilt forward like a drone. But unlike a drone, it has a lot of body surface area that gives the vehicle a lot of drag and slows the vehicle down, and also generates negative lift as the air in the front pushes the nose down, which will also create serious control issues. The large surface area of the body will also make it susceptible to winds and will make it difficult to fly forward and control in high winds. Also, all those fancy looking fins all over the vehicle create a lot of drag. The vehicle has no wings, and the short fins on the body will not provide any lift unless the vehicle flies really fast, and this is not possible since it flies like a drone. Instead of focusing on a good flying design in the beginning, they started with a fancy looking body and then tried to find a way to make it fly. Given that batteries today are so heavy and have low energy densities, flying cars have to be very efficient aerodynamically to get decent performance. The specifications of the vehicle are ridiculous and completely fictitious. But it is a cool looking vehicle. Too bad it wont work very well. Lastly, it is not a real flying car, since does not have any wheels. It is just a poor performance manned drone with internal prop motors. But I will say that it is inspiring !
i understand everyone's skepticism yet they are going about it the correct way,, making models that are scaled up with each prototype allowing for more data, its why these things take years to complete. i cannot wait to see their full sized (human sized) prototype flying around.
The first flying car was licensed on March 8, 1946. The only reason they are not everywhere is because helicopters are very difficult to fly. "Flying cars" will only become popular when AI is advanced enough to fly them for us. So, until fully automated self-driving cars are ubiquitous, you won't have your "flying cars".
This. The only scenario where flying cars are allowed to exist without people crashing them into buildings and killing dozens of people is when we have autonomous self driving cars that communicate with each other to get around and avoid crashes.
Not sure why so many people are sceptical. Have you seen how much more efficient a Dyson fan is? You know hidden blades and what not… they’re just making this into something drivable.
I remember playing f-zero on my Gameboy Advanced on the school bus back in the day, and now I see we are getting to see the real thing in our lifetime.
This creates a major problem. Not only accidents on the roads. But also puts Houses and any other Buildings into the equation when you try to insure it.
Finally a streamlined and SEXY flying car. It looks fast just sitting there. I can easily imagine this sporty beast whipping around our skies. I wanna fly one. Yay!!!!!
No one made a flying car. They made a model of a flying car.
Accurate statement. SMH
search flying car made in Slovakia
Iya nanti kita Akan Buat Banyak Dengan Modal IMF Perusahaan Indostri Perekonomian ekonomi Keuangan Bursa saham Efek Keungan Ekonomi Uang Dan Perusahaan IMF Bank Modal Dunia Saya oke !!. tapi jenis Sekarang Tolong Simpan Satu Untuk saya Untuk saya Kasih Ke Keluarga Saya ,untuk ia Gunakan ,Selain juga ia Promosi Pertama Pemakaian Di Provinsi Palangkaraya Kecamatan Dadahup Kalimatan Tengah Indonesia oke !! Sual Strip Sosialisasi Coming Dek bisa Saya dan anda Rundingkan .BY .Saya Franki \ Pran 👑 Pollpran King of the king Dim Muda baru \ Presiden Besar tertinggi dunia Baru Amerika \ PBB 🌐 Pemimpin Dunia Perserikatan Bangsa Bangsa: ( Petualang Penomenal Gitar 🎸 Heroes InasPer \ Tour Keliling dunia Pertujukan 2000 Negara Bangsa Bangsa Dunia 🌏🌎🌍🤟🇮🇩
Franki 👑 inasPer New Legend Dunia 🎸🤟🇮🇩
Helicopters are flying cars.
That thing looks fast! Probably moves at the speed of pretend!
😂
LOL I like the pretend speed comment, but yha if it flies 120 - 230 kmh
@@yvangenesse1649 that thing seems like it certainly could, and that could be problematic in the real world. the g forces too, this thing looks like it can move a lot of air.
😂
Mmm...speed of thought.
Even if it fails, still the sleekest looking prototype design I've ever seen. Could slip that thing into a Blade Runner movie, wouldn't even notice 👌
At least someone knows how to design..
If only Lamborghini would start churning out their vehicles into aircars !!!
It actually flies already they have done real life testing already. Now umm will it work once scaled up probably but we will have to wait and see.
Then you should check out 3d design and model.
I was thinking that myself. I think visually it is cooler looking than any of the Star Wars Racers that Young Vader flew in. I only saw part of that movie; he watched the race or was in the race...not sure which one. Anyway this is cooler than any of those Star Wars concept vehicles. However the cool look while it would be really popular with people who like Blade Runner or Sci Fi, that look would mean the inside the passenger area would be cramped; people still would buy this version even knowing it is cramped, but the practical consumer would want more room.
Vaporware: This car doesn't exist and will never exist. Prove me wrong.
In the future probly when we are dead and long gone something like this will be a reality
@@tippedjungle I genuinely doubt it, as it's just plain impractical on what ends up feeling like an infinite number of levels, but it looks cool in movies, and is perfect for Dubai's fake economy.
@all4espi have you not seen the single person drone vehicles? Impractical? Why? Ofcourse something like this will become commercially viable.. I'm sure people thought the same about the aeroplane until the wright brothers built and flew one. Future technology is not beyond our capacity to believe it in some cases it is because we have no way of knowing. But this is going to be a reality maybe in our lifetime. Just you wait and see
Its a matter of energy economy. A fixed wing aircraft is a very energy cheap way to get stuff off the ground. This thing .. I wouldn't be surprised if it's $10k per hour to lift just one guy.
@@tippedjungle As an engineer, I can list off so many reasons why, but none of those reasons matter, as the laws of thermodynamics cut them off at the pass. A steampunk world with helium or hydrogen filled balloons and human powered propellers and rudders would be more practrical than any kind of heavier than air craft that relies on pushing the air down faster than it would otherwise fall. And lets not ignore the elephant in the room - the noise pollution caused by all those idiotic oversized drones hovering around.
There is no commercial viability whatsoever, and it is impractical on all levels. It's just dumb.
Thing is. Making flying cars is relatively easy. We’ve been conceptualising the idea since the 1980’s. Some people even made em. The problem isn’t making a car fly. But making it safe. Car crashes are very common. But on the ground you have physical barriers that stop most from flying off and hitting someone’s house. Or populated buildings. But if every car was flying. You’ll have a thousand flying metal projectiles wizzing around everyone’s head all the time
Yep perfectly safe - NOT.
Don't worry, I am sure Boeing would guarantee their safety. Oh, right...
If they're reliably fully autonomous it could work.
We could bypass this by having emergency backup power that's used for emergency landing in the event of accidents, hazards, or battery dropping below a certain percentage.
If the onboard computer could calculate the distance and time it would take to reach a destination while accounting for potential variables, efficiently reserving power would be much more possible.
The questions then become how do we achieve this and how many variables should be counted for this to be even viable?
Worse, how do we land safely if the chassis and or onboard flight system has been compromised due to hazards or accidents?
I haven't even addressed the current constraints with battery capacity and charging.
I could see this taking decades to solve.
Imagine a drunk driver in a flying car a recipe for disaster.
SO in reality they haven't built a flying car. They built a small remote controlled toy.
exactly
and some futuristic looking renders
It doesn't appear to have any wheels either.
Scaled down model, they've had flying RC drones for many years. If they can get this FAA approved, could be another was of transportation. It isn't gonna be cheap like the price of an uber though.
They have built a 1/2 scale prototype. That's normal for any aviation company to do before building at full scale.
I love it when you say your concept is better than anything built right now. Especially when your concept isn't even full scale.
Because they're testing it for sports first they literally said that😂
@Fuzzled369 I feel like you didn't even read the comment. I don't know why people wake up and choose chaos...
Okay. They're testing it on sports first. Hooray! Congrats to them! But it's not a full scale... which was my point... so what's your point? What exactly are you burning me on and giggling like a schoolgirl about?
Batman would approve
Someone actually made a real model of a flying car for the 300th time.
yea and people dont understand that if the flying car was so great it wouldnt come up every ten or so years as a "NEW TECHNOLOGY" and then dissapear again
@@cheese3024ngl at how fast technology is advancing rn i feel like i can get myself a little bit hyped about stuff like this since it may actually become reality. I would LOVE to see flying car races first for like the first 10 years or do, and if they decide to allow ppl to drive them around they should only allow experienced and trusted drivers
Bc guys like this keep showing up😂
And people like me commenting and clicking,, oh and you as well, thanks for playing into the algorithm
@@f87115 Maybe they should bring back the dislike counter??? Wouldn't that be something.
Finaly a flying car that actually looks like a flying car and not looking like a helicopter with different design
Or an aeroplane.
But it doesn’t have wheels. So it doesn’t actually drive on the roads. Sucks.
Insurance company. "We're not covering damage to your house. You don't have the flying car coverage."
You’re gonna crash if you try to move a little bit. That thing looks unstable. No one would buy that
@@hexenhammer483 naaah they will give you the cover they just won't pay.
For anyone wondering, the company name is Bellwether Industries. A London-based Taiwan company. The 'flying car' model name is Volar. It uses 4 ducted fans as propulsion.
Ah, so they made a car shaped drone.
@@dompan9169so what
Has it got sublight engines
😳🤪😂🤣😅
I'll just put it on my wish list of this is never going to happen. just below elio motors (trike car)... if I live to be 100 years old, this is just a pipe dream in real time. It's just never going to be real. And probably too expensive for rich people, let alone general population..
The day people start driving flying cars is the day I move underground.
There are a lot of car crashes on the ground already, what's more in sky? Imagine the mortality rate going up.
**flying
@@noleal08Um not worried about sky crashes as much as them coming down, but I think this thing is limited in height it can fly
@noleal08 Can't be that high or our billionaires would invest... for carbon reduction, of course.
Ya that way you can really say "I live under a rock"😂
An actual flying car that doesn't fly , I can't believe that people still try selling these concepts out side of video games and films .
There is one that is FAA approved. It is probably the first one we will see. That is the problem with most of them the FAA will not approve them.
@ComdrStew Their not going to have a bunch of idiots flying above raining down on people. Besides it wouldn't even be affordable for the average person.
@@josephallen8044 I agree with the idiot drivers part yes, but if flying cars came to market then that I would think eventually they would become affordable similar to how cars evolved from being something only for wealthy people to then becoming common place like today.
Exactly. This is only a design for what a flying car could look like until we figure out how.😒
The gas prices for super petrol alone with make it impossible for any normal person😂
drunken flying is bound to make epic fail videos
Only way I can see this working is by having pilots operating them like ubers or private jets. Won't be available to the mass until AI is good enough to completely take over like in bladerunner
Like all such vehicles I'll believe it when I see it actually in use in any environment that isn't very carefully controlled .
Indian cities are exploding and would be a challenge to see them flying around without getting hit
@@SanjayGupta-nt9vn I've ridden in an Indian taxi. Forget about flying.😂
@@SanjayGupta-nt9vn :) or get tangled in powerlines....
Other companies already have their own versions of these but those ones I seen are more like flying one person ATVs with 45 minute fly times.
Air space is vary limited for personal flying, Any flight is going to be carefully controlled
you may as well be standing next to a Warp Engine, until it is actually hovering, it is about as realistic
I'm surprised they didn't claim it was going to mars.
Thats what they said before the Wright Brothers flight. If this is like standing next to warp drive then I guess we warp drives since I know of one flying car you can actually buy for over $75k.
@@brianawilk285 Except it was easy to build a model and test it independently, There were gliders and airships, it was only a mater of time, really days or weeks before someone else beat the wright bros. This fantasy model is just that, fantasy.
The warp engine is next on the to do list, be patient.
@@egrintarg230 O'reiley's already sells a flux capacitor.
Beautiful vaporware that will go the way that all flying cars have. Nowhere.
And nobody still won't answer the question why do we need flying cars??????????
Real flying cars wont be possible untill we have insane breakthrough in energy storage
And even then, you would still want an efficient design because that will cost less to use and maintain.
George Jetson would be very proud! Finally a design that looks truly futuristic!😎
And by the time he's grown up it'll be ready for him right now he's just a baby
Meet George Jetson, Jane his wife, his boy ElRoy...........
@@jerodoverfield9635 You mean his father is likely a baby or maybe a teen if we're optimistic.
@coreym162 if I remember correctly, (saw a post about it a while ago) according to details in the cartoon, George is born this year
Proof of flying concept is more important than another Dr Moller’s day dream.
Yup TOTAL BS hahahaha
Seen so many of these in the last 30 years, they all end up as a more expensive helicopter alternative or fail to meet regulation standards.
Moller's vehicle worked! His rotary engine works. His idea is valid but his business sense not so much. There is an interview with him on RUclips explaining how it all went wrong.
@@jamesvertrees5857 if it was only 'business sense' that was lacking, then somebody else would have picked up the idea and ran with it. But unfortunately the idea itself was the problem.
@@chriscampbell4857 The idea is not the problem. A generator powered by a wankel engine using energy dense fuel to have greater range is what some drones use now. The idea is solid because the math supports it and it is validated by many engineers using same concept in their designs. The Bellwether EVTOL uses many lifting surfaces in its design to take some of the load off the engines. Many drones uses this concept. I believe Moller has the right idea in using highly efficient engines to generate the power for the fans. New designs in vane shapes can increase lift and quiet the noise. Technology is always advancing but for a project to be successful the math must work. Bellwether has a design where the math works. Moller's idea worked. It was his business sense that ultimately was the problem along with skeptics with little imagination. The hybrid approach is becoming more popular in the drone biz just like Moller predicted because the math works.
Honestly, all we need is a hover car not a flying one. Not having to deal with the harsh roads everyday would be nice.
Yes! It would be more realistic and could be used much safer and would be a REAL beginning to implement flying vehicles.
Agree, Hoovering is more pratical and safer. We dont need to go hundred or thousday of feet in to air, we can just made wide strecth of land that isnt dusty for car to slightly hover over. Flying cars will need designated space and air to fly over anyways, why not just make some wider strecth of land for cars to hoover over.
Agreed!😊
Agreed!😊
Yep 👍,am coming up with one pretty soon 😊
dude, very impressive. First flying car that’s impressed me since I heard about them in 2004.
We didn’t even get to see it genuinely working, though, just computer generated animations.
Can we see it fly? “NO, you freakin’ kidding me”!
That integrated wing design is just top tier aerodynamics. Exciting!!
3:50 is the model hovering by its own power (with safety tether) for those wondering if it's just a model. They have tested it flying as model scale, which how all the current rideable drones in production started.
"Prototypes are easy, Mass-production is hard" - Elon Musk
Is this a flying car or a Space craft ?!?
No wings or visible means of lift. Lots of cool shiny plastic. Excellent!
It will use antigravity (when it will be invented LOL)
The propellers are on the inside like dyson fan, did you miss that part if the video?
Did you see the model? It is covered in delta wing shapes, ie lifting surfaces with forward flight. It will work. The question is will it be commercially viable.
@@mythrin It looks like they are designed for the forwards thrust there is nothing for the vertical lift.
@@jamesvertrees5857 With wing so small it will need to fly at MACH 3 to generate enough lift. a car needs to be able to hover so wings are useless
I give it another 50 to 100 years before we see this come to fruition 😂!
Regulations certainly would take a big part in that happening, although research and development can be much faster now vs the past 20 years, such things tend to slow based on funding the projects, but the technology is here
Don’t be so negative.
Can’t they use AI to figure this out
I would say probably say in a slightly shorter time due to the people working on projects involved in EV flight. The problem is power for these concepts. It certainly needs a big leap in battery tech for it to be viable. Most are only any good for 20 minutes flight time. The first company to crack flight time will corner the market.
this is equivalent to concept cars that never get made, except this is way worse because they don't even know how they're gonna
Gonorrhoea
Yep, this is worst than concept cars. At least Concept cars are full size actual working models, here this thing is all lame Animation or a Small RC drone. Can we say Cheap Click Bait???
@@abcxyz6606 How is this worst?
@@57HarleyDavidson Concept cars are real working cars that never make it to market, this as a concept isn't even full sized yet, it's just a toy at this point
@@EndoftheBeginning17 This isn't a toy.
3:56, Wipeout 2025? :P Although less with anti gravity at this stage.
It's a fancy looking quad copter that won't be able to achieve very dynamic flight capabilities specifically because it uses small ducted fans instead of open rotors, all to achieve a futurist aesthetic.
The point of having coaxial props is to have redundancy incase of motor or propeller failure in one corner. Without redundancy, a failure in one corner will cause the craft to plummet into the earth.
Finally looking like someone took a proper step towards the future of hovering/flying cars!!
Instead of open propellers they enclosed it to pressure the air only downwards, just like thrusters!
Well done and hoping for best.
Facts I jus said this on another channel propellers n the whole drone design is flawed
So apparently, if it applies air pressure downwards, it needs speed and it needs to be continuesly moving forward to fly upwards?, this will need alot of artificial thrusters when parking and slowing down to avoid damage, and it would require a whole lot more energy or gas
The concept of this is cool and it looks great but I’ll believe it when I actually see it with someone in it and it flying!
I’ve never seen someone get so excited over a fiberglass shell
I love this. I’m very excited to an actual hover car be made for society. As a business man that lives near the city and is looking to eventually move to the city, a hover car will definitely come in handy, especially if it can seat 5 people. I’m also looking forward to watching sports leagues that will be racing these vehicles. That is so cool. This is another good way to introduce how cool this kind of car will be. I look forward to building this car in the future, and being able to see different design concepts and suv versions of this vehicle.
I designed one just like it but left out unnecessary body panels. I had 2 enclosed propellers in the rear using on an outer pivot system, so the motor is fixed separately and the maneuvering is done moving the enclosure. On the front a single larger enclosed propeller on the same set up. 3 all together to stablalize and maneuver good while reducing the demand 4 motors would draw. The center cabin could seat four or two and cargo. I dont think we will be able to accommodate larger designs with the volume taken from possible roads or landing areas. It would exceed lane and parking widths to do more.
Their design would be controlled by wind easier an operate against more resistance with more weight. Mine would be the egg shape to reduce drag by simply not having the fancy looking wing body panels.
So a mockup of an 'actual' flying car. Hmm. I smell actual equine manure.
Smaller propellers / impellers at higher rpm also mean higher disc loading and less efficiency. With those very minimal lifting surfaces, I cannot imagine it to be very efficient.
Exaclty. its click bait at the moment. That probably why its only a small RC size scale. Its not true legit fully car until its full size, can carry atleast 2 grown adults + some extra weith for at least 100 miles
Just use more? I'm not worried about the speed but the battery. How far can you drive/fly this before it goes down. 18-100km for an hour at 80km/h would be awesome 😎
@@AndroidFerret You cannot just add more batteries as more batteries mean more weight. Eventually, you get diminishing returns. At this point, no matter how many batteries you add, the range won't increase.
Yeh, I can just picture cops trying to chase after this contraption
I think of the F-Zero game right away when I saw this. Nice concept.
I've been following bellwether industry for a while and they've been getting better and better and I'm confident they will come to the market
LOL I'm not
@@andrewthomas8233 why not?
To come to market is one thing, for people to buy these as it stands they will have to have a pilot's licence.
There's only a few people that are wealthy enough with a pilot's licence that would be able to lease one of these never mind buy because the price tag will probably be about a million bucks if not more. And of these people only a few will even bother more than once, it's a very limited market.
To sell these and be viable you have to sell to the greater populace so it would have to be cheap and reliable, and the government would have to approve it.
Let's look at self-driving, Tesla's cars can all self-drive, you're not supposed to but the software is there. The reason it hasn't been legally deployed is that Tesla can't meet the safety standards required, the AI software will run over obstacles, make incorrect analysis of what it sees. Several stories of cars doing the incorrect actions. Elon keeps saying ext year but for all these self-driving cars in the works none are remotely close in the final analysis
Now apply all of that data to average people driving in a city.
As it is right now, they'll need a pilot's licence and log hours until qualified to fly one of these, perhaps 500 to a thousand hours in a real plane and then one of these hover cars but not on the road.
Then there comes traffic control systems like stop lights and whatnot because you know people will just fly between buildings and won't see the cross traffic. These things count in terms of one of these things being able to be sold, because there will need to be MASSIVE infrastructure changes to incorporate these into a city environment
Making these things a reality will cost time and effort to even remotely get off the ground.
An artplane is an airplan when it flies. Not before.
Always nice to see something like this and that people put effort and time in it. It would surprise me if I realy see it someday in action though!
4:59-5:03 Look at this shit! The flying "The Matrix" hovercrafts are becoming a reality, so does A.I. too! I guess after 100 years later human-machine war and enslavement of humanity in the computer system called "The Matrix" can be a reality as well!
Flying coffin 😮
Trouble is it won't work , not enough power or lift .
It's a real shame an expert like you isn't working for the team that has designed and built this - they'd have saved so much time and effort with this input.
@@ned_biggsYes I will try to contact them .
@@ned_biggs Comment of the year here 😂😂😭😭
@@ned_biggs It won't work.
This is basically like a giant wingsuit that can lift off from a standstill. Love the concept. Personally, I've always wanted to see something like this with wheels that can drive and lift off from a runway.
Exactly, hence the term Flying car!!!
@@jamessmith6162 something like that.
It looks like a standard quad drone with a fancy fascia.
Automobiles were like that too. Took about fifty years before they were able to get the public onboard.
It is and and the scale model has a lot of dipping/diving when in flight. It almost looks too unstable for a commercial air vehicle...
And you sound like someone that has sight impairment.
Flying car ❌
Flying boat ✅
They could have made the flight mode more efficient if they had used a lifting body design. I love how it looks, but I would also love to see the lifting body concept included to help save energy during flight.
Even empty you can see the instability and wild pitching corrections necessary to hold hover position. He makes a point of shooting down large rotors and such but it is those large lifting configurations that yield stability they are lacking. Looks like we have another Moler sky car to watch...
Nikola: This is an actual electric truck! (Then films it rolling down a hill) 🙄
very ambitious! it’s people like them that vehicles from fiction will become reality in the near future. kudos to them!
There have been flying cars for decades. The biggest issue with bringing them to market is the licenses needed to operate and the vehicle has to meet both FAA and standard automobile regulations. Which changes often and puts the designers back to the drawing board.
Im not going to be impressed until someone actually flies in it. Right now you have a nice looking drone
Making any vehicle look good is the easiest part. It's the actual flying is the hard part.
Wipeout is almost here.....WOW!!!! Just need to build the racetracks from the game
Racing is going to work out so well, no one will die from this.
Maybe it'll be time trial based?
Yeah nobody dies in F1 or nascar or anything either you're right... people definitely dont still do those regardless of the threat of death. Oh and base jumping AND skydiving. Way too dangerous... tf out bitch lmao
Finally a future car that actually looks like the future we imagine & not futuristic look with wheels or future air vehicles with modern propellers 😮
So where's the flux capacitor located? 🤔
That race they are going to be doing, especially in the desert is going to be something out of Star Wars.
I was also thinking F- Zero style races...
@@jacobe1942 Hell yeah! F-Zero too🤘
@@itzamia I remember how many tries it took me to master some levels.... actually kings court 2 is near impossiple. So racing them is not for me.
It’s all fun and games till your future kids snatch it for a joyride
What's the name of this concept?
I think it's in the stage of development, right now it's mostly stimulated through computers, it hasn't been picked up by any brand, but they could give it a model name 😅😅
Name of the concept is Volar
@@g0d182 Thanks
XR-1 Deathtrap.
All companies that manufacture flying vehicles or drones must demonstrate what this vehicle can do in the event of an incident or accidental roll or rollover due to a machine error, human error or even a natural calamity such as a sudden increase in wind, what emergency actions a pilot will do and what it looks like while having a problem in the air and see what will happen in what maneuver the pilot will do or does.
Captain Falcon’s raceway is becoming a reality bruh we got to get it together first.
Is anyone else just dying to know the obvious question or is it just me, they seemed to be very careful not to talk about what actually powers this thing or show any details of the underside wherein lies the secret I'm sure - is it EDF, DF, DP or anti gravity?
It's a good idea to put it in sports first since it'll be the perfect area to test for any needed upgrades and design modifications. I'd hate to see things falling out of the sky because of a malfunction or a news saying someone hacked the navigation and made these "flying cars" rockets for some terrorist organization.
I have never understood with all the other ideas how anyone thinks open blades is a good idea! This looks better!
Covered blades reduce efficiency.
You're so smart, you should ask why they dont cover Helicopter blades already.
Can Jet's hoover the same way these Spinning Drone/Heli's can?
@@abcxyz6606 Covering any blades add weight and reduces airflow, helicopter blades are above peoples heads at a safe distance so no need to cover them.
@@abcxyz6606 Answer is yes. A few jets were designed to lift off in hover mode, they're called VTOL's (Vertical TakeOff and Landing), one of which is called the Harrier
Kobe bryant should've bought a car like that.
I don’t know how to tell you this, but there have been several flying cars built since 1917. Not all of them flew ofcourse, specially the first few attempts but lately there have been serious attempts at making flying cars commercially viable.
would be nice to know the name of the vehicle or at least the name of the company.
I was intrigued by the car and it's advancements that I didn't hear the name of it the first time, so I watched again, but no name revealed
Their name is BS Industries
Is that a Click Bait Large RC?? There are Tons of RC plane/cars already. Don't try to claim it a legit flying car until its a full functional Size, can carry at least two grown adults, plus some luggage, for at least 100 miles plus of range in air, and 200 miles on road.
Ive been promised this in the year 2000. 24 years later and I'm still on the ground like a peasant.
Wow! This looks really cool. The only problem is, people already have a serious problem with driving on the road, so I really don't trust people with a flying car.
I always see people say this and never understand what they mean. Roads are finite areas typically rife with hazards all around ( medians, telephone poles, street lights, construction crews etc.) not to mention other vehicles in close proximity at all times, and are prone to external conditions like weather (freezing, flooding, cracking etc.) and have to be maintained consistently for optimal efficiency/safety so it would make sense accidents are commonplace when there are so many variables. Wouldn’t it actually be much easier to navigate and maintain safety when you have the entirety of the atmosphere to escape to in a dangerous situation. Less costly to maintain air travel as well (virtually no cost whatsoever aside from maybe some guidance systems) Think how rare it is to hear about or witness two planes or helicopters or really any aerial vehicles crashing into each other vs how often it happens with vehicles. This is due to the inherent differences between the two travel modes. I think sky travel would be way safer as long as we had dependable vehicles and established altitude limits keeping you from risk of interrupting planes or crashing into skyscrapers.
By the time we get to flying cars, everything will be AI controlled
damn it. my idea!!! concept cars like these would definitely work as sports racing first. welp. moving onto another idea.
Until I see it fly, it's just another concept vehicle that may or may not ever see the light of day
Almost there then. Just need to invent the anti-gravity drive to power it and put it into production. No worries!
Coming from someone who has no interest in conventional racing, I would actually consider watching a race with these.
Truth is we don't even need flying cars it's just a cool flex
flying is the future! I can hardly wait until i get to own something like this!
Musk has a ride on a hyperloop for sale, too.
... muito top o carro voador, tem um design bem futurista! 🛸
I agree 💯
This vehicle is all show and no go! It is just a quad copter with the prop motors hidden inside, with air fed to the prop motors via ducts in the top of the body. Unfortunately the fancy looking ducts block free flow to the prop motors and reduce the thrust and efficiency, which will give it poor range and will make it loud. The prop motors do not tilt, and in order to move forward, the entire vehicle has to tilt forward like a drone. But unlike a drone, it has a lot of body surface area that gives the vehicle a lot of drag and slows the vehicle down, and also generates negative lift as the air in the front pushes the nose down, which will also create serious control issues. The large surface area of the body will also make it susceptible to winds and will make it difficult to fly forward and control in high winds. Also, all those fancy looking fins all over the vehicle create a lot of drag. The vehicle has no wings, and the short fins on the body will not provide any lift unless the vehicle flies really fast, and this is not possible since it flies like a drone. Instead of focusing on a good flying design in the beginning, they started with a fancy looking body and then tried to find a way to make it fly. Given that batteries today are so heavy and have low energy densities, flying cars have to be very efficient aerodynamically to get decent performance. The specifications of the vehicle are ridiculous and completely fictitious. But it is a cool looking vehicle. Too bad it wont work very well. Lastly, it is not a real flying car, since does not have any wheels. It is just a poor performance manned drone with internal prop motors. But I will say that it is inspiring !
i understand everyone's skepticism yet they are going about it the correct way,, making models that are scaled up with each prototype allowing for more data, its why these things take years to complete. i cannot wait to see their full sized (human sized) prototype flying around.
The first flying car was licensed on March 8, 1946. The only reason they are not everywhere is because helicopters are very difficult to fly. "Flying cars" will only become popular when AI is advanced enough to fly them for us. So, until fully automated self-driving cars are ubiquitous, you won't have your "flying cars".
This. The only scenario where flying cars are allowed to exist without people crashing them into buildings and killing dozens of people is when we have autonomous self driving cars that communicate with each other to get around and avoid crashes.
When the flying cars come out we'd be able to fly in the skies I'm going to be listening to some old school gangster rap
The video isn't about an actual flying car. It's about dreams of a flying car.
Yay! A sky full of missiles packed with 5 people who don't realize they are already dead!
all those gravity defying race fames of the early 2000s are about to be the coolest drone races!
Not sure why so many people are sceptical. Have you seen how much more efficient a Dyson fan is? You know hidden blades and what not… they’re just making this into something drivable.
I remember playing f-zero on my Gameboy Advanced on the school bus back in the day, and now I see we are getting to see the real thing in our lifetime.
This creates a major problem. Not only accidents on the roads. But also puts Houses and any other Buildings into the equation when you try to insure it.
'so, what's the next step? '
'well, we are hoping to fit a person inside one day'
So this concept is more real than the real stuff that is flying now. COOL........
Finally a streamlined and SEXY flying car. It looks fast just sitting there. I can easily imagine this sporty beast whipping around our skies. I wanna fly one. Yay!!!!!
I think that would be cool to fly like a witch in real life on a real flying broomstick
The only place this will fly is in a videogame.