"The thing about 600 elo chess is one game you're playing Magnus Carlsen, the next you're playing someone who doesn't know right from left" > *proceeds to do both in the same game*
That's litterally my gameplay I'm 614 elo rn and just played a game where I made 5 mistakes in first 8 moves and proceed to play 16 best + 3 excellent moves and win a game (it was 8 or smth in a row best moves which made me go from +3 to +8
It's so true. I was under 1100 for a minute, and people would play literal random moves following 0 theory for the first 5 moves and end up creating insane opening traps. They'd lose in mid and end game, but those openings and games you find yourself in are pure chaos
681 spotted a 7 move sequence involving a rook subtracted by knight sacrifice by bait leading to apparent (since it's actually defendable but the defense is not easy to spot either) mate in 5 by king manipulation, discovered check and last minute bishop support from the dynamic knight im at a loss for words
@@vikhyatchandan1897 After Bb2×Be5 oponent Could do Rd8×Rd6. Then after Knight text rook pawn text knight the material would be equal and black can still play on. But for a 600 It is great
@@Jumper123_it's not that obvious actually that putting the Bishop before the pawn is bad. You either gotta have experience of million matches or just remember what some RUclipsr said and believe in it like Gods word
Generally speaking. Yes, it's bad to put the bishop infront of the pawn, but please. The best move depends on what your enemy does, so just calculate the position man.
@@incitatuspersonified6586 something along the lines of Qg7 able to trap the rook,and I remember he played a4 or b4 to distract the queen which wasn't even guarding the g7 square
@@sahaiariaka4544 What are you smoking??? Do you know where I could buy that cuz ur on the good shit. Or ur just trolling idk but that didn't happen in this video.
From my experience lower rated players calculate more than higher rated ones. Lower rated players calculate a lot of non forcing lines in every position, even when there’s nothing to calculate, most of the calculations are non critical and or irrelevant lines. 🤔🤔🤔
Im betting he’s not rated 600 lol. The terminology he uses suggests he knows what he’s talking about, or at least has watched some RUclips videos on the topic, so I’d expect him to Ne at least 800/900
The opening in the beginning is the called the scandinavian. The main line is you take his pawn, he takes back with the queen and you develop your knight, attacking his queen. Yes, he's technically developing his queen for free, but not really, cause it's not good practice to take your queen out so early since it can be attacked, and now your opponent is developing for free while you're hiding your queen. that's what tempo is.
They can also bring out a knight and get your pawn back that way to avoid the knight immediately hitting the queen (with the idea of trading first) but in all the scandinavian games I've played, I have seen that happen like
FM here. This video was really entertaining; you've got a knack for explaining things in an engaging way. Best of luck on the way to 700 and onwards - you showed good self-awareness in this video, which will help a lot!
1350ish player here. That was the funniest and most brilliant chess video I have ever seen. And yes, saccing the rook on c5 was the right move, even you you don't seem to have understood why. Put very simply, if he recaptures, you can put your plan into effect, and if he doesn't, you've won a knight.
4:12 this is when I realized I will never be decent at Chess. This guy is rated 600 and seeing that far ahead already, I see like 2 moves ahead if I'm lucky. I don't even think I'm dumb but my brain cannot seem to process this game well at all.
Tbf the better you get at chess the harder you think about future moves because you know there could be subtle tactics right around the corner which is fun to find but paranoia inducing when you know your opponent has similar chances, which in turn increases stress levels that clouds your judgement. Now take someone who doesn't really know a whole lot and they'll use that blissful ignorance to come up with the most savage tactics.
Anyone's brain can process chess tactics if they spend enough hours practicing. I wouldn't see this shit when I was 600 either but it's been less than 2 years from that and I'm 1700 now.
The best advice I can give to you that I haven’t seen any other people give is that if you’re going to play a 15 minute long game then use all 15 minutes of your time. You only used 5 minutes in this game, but think of how much better you could’ve played if you had triple the amount of thinking time. That’s like, triple the brain power.
@@ศกรโสมาภา knight takes rook looks like a good line to win back a lot of material there, I think it's still a winning idea anyways even w/o ending in mate
It was great to see how he has a lot of ideas and understanding of the game (about development, blocking pieces, etc...) but don't know which ideas to prioritize. Once he had one idea that he had to follow through, he did that really well and ended up with a nice result. Congrats on the beautiful ending
Dude! You're freaking hilarious, and as someone who just got in to chess and has finally surrendered to learning the sequential aspects of it and whatnot, your narrations are just so relatable. That was so funny how you called the bishop doing fancy shmancy moves and how sometimes I think a stupid elo opponent just isn't seeing something but in reality I just suck cheeks and am about to lose to a pawn. Subscribed and can't wait to casually enjoy your content.😂
0:24, i can definitely see why letting him get the queen to the centre looks bad, but the queen is actually misplaced there because it can be attacked so easily. For example after he takes the pawn with the queen, your next move can be attacking his queen with knight c3, then the queen will have to awkwardly scurry away and you can develop the rest of your pieces very easily and have a very nice game
Actually (☝️🤓) the Scandinavian is literally an opening made to support the queen going out there, so it is technically not misplaced if you follow the theory well. If you do, both sides (not just White) will have a pretty equal game. I bring this up because the Scandi is a little uncommon in low rank games, meaning his opponent definitely prepared a little theory at least (usually you see the King's Pawn Game rather than a Scandi so he definitely did it on purpose), so he definitely expected to have his queen out. Or he wanted to play a Portuguese Gambit which is even rarer but still...
@@yeetrepublic9142 yes, in the Scandi black aims to support the misplaced queen with either moving it straight back to d8 (which creates a pretty solid yet unambitious game imo) or plays moves like c6 to give the queen comfortable retreating squares in the qa5 variation, but the queen is still misplaced nonetheless, as it almost always has to move elsewhere (often multiple times) before meaningfully contributing to any of blacks ideas. yes i agree that black knew he was getting the queen out, and i agree it isnt a terrible opening, im just saying that taking the pawn on move 2 is by far the best move
LMAO! Great stuff! I love how you set it up, and he just ignores it... so utter and completely. So you move a pawn to catch his eye. That's insane, but I completely get it. And he's like "Oh, that... well, nope." LMAO! So out of spite, "I was sac'ing this anyways... EFF YOU!" to take the Knight and LOSE YOUR ROOK. But it did what you needed, cleared that space for your 2nd Bishop. Well freaking done.
I'm an 1800 (vids on my channel with proof), and this was and interesting analysis of a game. The opening was hilarious to watch because it was as simple as exd5. The idea is when he takes his queen out you respond with developing all of your pieces while he fiddles with his queen. I also liked the ideas in the middlegame where you created checkmate threats. In the end it was just ggwp.
@@erik4177 I think he's saying after 1. e4 d5 the main move is 2. exd5. After 2. Bd3 (as in the game) f5? just blunders a pawn, and exf5 would have been a good move there.
A bit hard to see, but after the dark bishop check, he could have blocked w the rook, at the end of 'takes with knight' 'takes with pawn' and 'takes back with bishop' it's just winning a pawn. Still a good plan overall, very good finish for 600
6:20 excellent idea and nice it worked, but the dude had a chance to block the initial bishop check with a rook and you would be just down a rook (if you took the rook in final position)
Its impressive that a 600 elo player spotted the tactics at the end and the sacrificing of the rook, must be the result is of puzzles and training You have potential 😉
i can't express how relatable this video video is. literally, every word is so pristinely relatable to, as if i were hearing my own thoughts. with the exception of the check mate part. i can only dream that i will be able to witness something like that ever again, not even in my own game, but whoever's.
The funny thing is, Rd6 would have completely stopped your checkmating attack (although, after they played g6 that would have still allowed you to win their Knight if Nxd6, exd6) and they would have come out of it up a pawn in material despite giving back the Rook (their King would have still been very open so there might have been tactical opportunities and definitely a positional advantage as long as they can't leverage their undeveloped material lead, but I don't see an immediately deadly threat against them as a 1600, so go ask an 1800 or a 2000).
I guess then he could take the rook with the knight and if the pawn takes the knight, he can take the knight with bishop. Trading a rook and a knight for a knight seems solid and would leave the game a completion between a rook and a bishop (with the king trapped in the corner) versus two bishops with a king that is free to move. White’s pawn structure is fucked tho
fucking love this, only a minute in but him explaining the opening and how confused he is and the way he says "horrible mistake" after queen to b2 fucking love this video sm
This is exactly my games. 0 understanding of openings, one horrificly stupid blunder, and then a single beautiful tactic executed with precision for the ages.
If after E4 black plays D5 you should always immediately take with your pawn because if the queen takes back you can bring your knight to C3 to attack the queen. Then the queen will most likely give a check on E4 but then you bring your Bishop to E2 to block it and keep attacking the queen because if you keep attacking the queen black will have to keep moving it well you get really good development. Also you are really damn good at making attacks Also also the structure thing with the bishop is called fianchettoing here's how you pronounce it because it's a bit of a doozy ruclips.net/video/jg5UQl1YaB8/видео.htmlsi=_bW1WAke7kuOEVEB
I love this video bc everything else I’ve seen is players who know all the strategies… As a beginner player, understanding the thought process and seeing mistakes is a lot more useful for me!
That ending was fucking insane actually. Many 1000+ elo players can't even find stuff like that. Going from blundering over and over to finding a 7 move sequence leading to checkmate is crazy.
5:26 The thing is your game calculations are way better than any other 600 elos. As an 1100 Elo player, I would have seen all those moves only after taking the bishop check. But I also saw the thing that if rook on d8 blocks the check then the checkmate is preventative and black ends up with more material. re5 kxe5 bxe5 rd6 bxd6 and exd6
That part where they didn't take the rook with the knight is so relatable. You make this big smart plan and it's just that one possibility you didn't think about that ends up happening
I searched up "playing against 600 ELO" because I keep losing, then I see the first 20 seconds of this video quite literally describing my exact thoughts on this particular move in that particular order
This was brilliant bro! Thanks so much for sharing this most entertaining insight into some thought processes that you are experiencing at your current early level of practical chess understanding. I’m a Chess Coach (around 2250 elo USCF) and stuff like this is pure gold for old Patzers like myself to help us focus on the right elements in creating & teaching a lesson! I’ll probably watch this a few more times and then make a lesson plan to address some of the more naturally confusing choices and directions you so humorously highlighted early in the video. Great Stuff! PS. If your looking for some free tips just let me know in the comments. Peace
beginning: doesnt understand the scandinavian is actually kinda bad for black, ending: discovers 7 move rook sacrifice involving a double bishop mate
Nah scandi isnt bad, maybe suboptimal at the masters level, anything bellow its a fine opening
@@3looy thats why I said kinda bad, I understand it can be played well, it's just slightly in whites favor
The mating pattern doesn't work. He just got lucky that opponent was trash
@@shamassive he was playing knowing his opponent was also 600 elo tho. hes taking that into the calculation
scandinavian is not bad for black wtf are you talking about
Finally a relatable chess game analysis
Relatable
Fr that's why i just subed him
Most relatable analysis ever
Yesss
exactly
"The thing about 600 elo chess is one game you're playing Magnus Carlsen, the next you're playing someone who doesn't know right from left"
> *proceeds to do both in the same game*
Yeah so relatable I just started after long time and was shocked to see 600 ratings games but now I am going to 700s now
Lmao too true. It's a very mixed bag
That's litterally my gameplay I'm 614 elo rn and just played a game where I made 5 mistakes in first 8 moves and proceed to play 16 best + 3 excellent moves and win a game (it was 8 or smth in a row best moves which made me go from +3 to +8
600 elo players know how to play, we just don't have great foresight or concentration
It's so true. I was under 1100 for a minute, and people would play literal random moves following 0 theory for the first 5 moves and end up creating insane opening traps. They'd lose in mid and end game, but those openings and games you find yourself in are pure chaos
There are only two types of players @600 elo those on their way up and those on their way down. That’s why it’s so crazy.
Next you are going to tell me a switch is only on or off.
@@macdonaldnnadiim pretty sure this guy didn't get the joke lol
The Dunning kruger effect is a b word for sure
me going from 800 to 400 and then to 1200 be like
@@wohwel1384no this comment is just stupid as fuck
"... OR if he sees all this fuck shit" is my favorite chess analysis of all time
I laughed hard at that part too
“Fancy structure that I don’t know the name of where the king sucks off the bishop.”
Lmfaooo facts
Mine is fancy schmancy fucking bullshit structure
R
681 spotted a 7 move sequence involving a rook subtracted by knight sacrifice by bait leading to apparent (since it's actually defendable but the defense is not easy to spot either) mate in 5 by king manipulation, discovered check and last minute bishop support from the dynamic knight
im at a loss for words
As a 1200 I am shook
Yes. That's the life of a 600
I've done similar moves and planned ahead, but the very next game I end up blundering my Queen in the first 4 moves.
I saw this line right away, and was pleasantly surprised it was actually in the video!
Idk it is normal ngl , that move was obvious
I mean, even after Black falls for it Rd6 is still completely fine
your opening: -600 elo
your middlegame: 6000 elo
Yeah but the opponent was like 200 elo...
Bruh everything was kinda trash. There was thousands of mistakes and inaccuracies 🐸
@@iamdescent8650 thousands? I don't think it was that many
@@iamdescent8650i m 1500 and I never came up with a plan like this ever, at max i plan for 3 moves ahead, op saw like 6 moves ahead lol
@@vikhyatchandan1897 After Bb2×Be5 oponent Could do Rd8×Rd6. Then after Knight text rook pawn text knight the material would be equal and black can still play on.
But for a 600 It is great
you started the game as a 600 elo player and ended as Mikhail Tal.. ggs
bro im 660+ elo and what the heck was he doing at the start
@@Jumper123_it's not that obvious actually that putting the Bishop before the pawn is bad. You either gotta have experience of million matches or just remember what some RUclipsr said and believe in it like Gods word
Bro it’s obvious 💀
@@ridingryder1754 not only is it not obvious, its a common move in some kings pawn openings with the idea of c3 bc2
Generally speaking. Yes, it's bad to put the bishop infront of the pawn, but please. The best move depends on what your enemy does, so just calculate the position man.
This is why magnus has to step down
😂
Bro is not Paul morphy
That was a beautifully horrific game. Keep it up lmao
Would you please play a game with me 🥺
As a 1600, I completely agree
@@exotic_poiison9070 damn, I am currently 1240... How to reach 1600 in a month 🗣️👉👈
I'm a 1100 but like most 1100s I can't stop blundering 1 or 2 move blunders so I'm not climbing elo. How to stop blundering?
@@progian750Make anymmove if you don’t know what todo but make sure nothing attacks that square and defend your pieces
Gotham really have to see this video
I cant explain my 600elo moves
Yeah if this guy was in Guess the elo 😂😂
the most obsurd one I've heard was "I was trying to distract the opponent" WHEN THERE WAS A HANGING PIECE THERE
Nah he was cooking on that one
Where was the hanging piece? I’m not too good at chess and trying to figure out what would’ve been a better play
@@incitatuspersonified6586 something along the lines of Qg7 able to trap the rook,and I remember he played a4 or b4 to distract the queen which wasn't even guarding the g7 square
@@sahaiariaka4544 What are you smoking??? Do you know where I could buy that cuz ur on the good shit. Or ur just trolling idk but that didn't happen in this video.
@@duckfacemcgee3271 I quote from myself "the most obsurd one I'VE heard" it's obviously not in the video
fianchetto = one of those fancy structures that the king hides behind and sucks off the bishop. gotcha
As one who only plays that I had to laugh
"Sucks off the bishop" 💀💀💀
I think he meant the King's Indian
You’ve got some great calculation for a 600
Endgame yes, opening… I mean wtf was that 💀
@@josku5 True lmao. But I like how genuine his opening mistakes were lol
From my experience lower rated players calculate more than higher rated ones. Lower rated players calculate a lot of non forcing lines in every position, even when there’s nothing to calculate, most of the calculations are non critical and or irrelevant lines. 🤔🤔🤔
Im betting he’s not rated 600 lol. The terminology he uses suggests he knows what he’s talking about, or at least has watched some RUclips videos on the topic, so I’d expect him to Ne at least 800/900
@@L333gok A 900 should have a basic grasp of opening principles. Be3 is not a grasp of opening principles ☠️
The opening in the beginning is the called the scandinavian. The main line is you take his pawn, he takes back with the queen and you develop your knight, attacking his queen. Yes, he's technically developing his queen for free, but not really, cause it's not good practice to take your queen out so early since it can be attacked, and now your opponent is developing for free while you're hiding your queen. that's what tempo is.
perfectly explained
@@eu-daemonic thanks!
@@eu-daemonic Except that, at the start of the comment, "you" means White, and then in the middle "you" morphs to meaning Black.
They can also bring out a knight and get your pawn back that way to avoid the knight immediately hitting the queen (with the idea of trading first) but in all the scandinavian games I've played, I have seen that happen like
He would need to learn how to properly deal with the queen first since there are a lot of pitfalls that can lose him material if he does it wrong
Normal person's response to the clinically insane Scandy opening
nah I got to 1700 in rapid&bullet singlehandedly playing d5 as black
When opponent goes Scandinavian, my thoughts are they probably need a therapy.
FM here. This video was really entertaining; you've got a knack for explaining things in an engaging way. Best of luck on the way to 700 and onwards - you showed good self-awareness in this video, which will help a lot!
Thank you sir. I really appreciate that.
900 elo here... so this is why im losing all my games lately
I was also a 650 elo player but Gotham came in my dream and creamed all over me... I gained 600 elo in a single month and am currently 1220 haha 🗣️
@@albatrossxpubgmobile5275 tf
@@albatrossxpubgmobile5275 i miss 10 seconds ago
@@albatrossxpubgmobile5275he surely came in your dream
Im also roughly about a month into the game and I am 750 elo @@albatrossxpubgmobile5275
1350ish player here. That was the funniest and most brilliant chess video I have ever seen. And yes, saccing the rook on c5 was the right move, even you you don't seem to have understood why. Put very simply, if he recaptures, you can put your plan into effect, and if he doesn't, you've won a knight.
Black can cover the bishop check with the rook and it would be just equal
Also, if white captures the rook with the bishop, black would STILL be up a rook and 2 pawns 💀
I’m 1450 we are not good
@@michaelcadden1464true
@@matiasnahuelgodoyborniai could be missing something but i dont think they would be equal. I think black is winning then
4:12 this is when I realized I will never be decent at Chess. This guy is rated 600 and seeing that far ahead already, I see like 2 moves ahead if I'm lucky. I don't even think I'm dumb but my brain cannot seem to process this game well at all.
Tbf the better you get at chess the harder you think about future moves because you know there could be subtle tactics right around the corner which is fun to find but paranoia inducing when you know your opponent has similar chances, which in turn increases stress levels that clouds your judgement.
Now take someone who doesn't really know a whole lot and they'll use that blissful ignorance to come up with the most savage tactics.
Anyone's brain can process chess tactics if they spend enough hours practicing. I wouldn't see this shit when I was 600 either but it's been less than 2 years from that and I'm 1700 now.
I am 1300 and I doubt I could have seen all that shit in an actual game, maybe in puzzles
The best advice I can give to you that I haven’t seen any other people give is that if you’re going to play a 15 minute long game then use all 15 minutes of your time. You only used 5 minutes in this game, but think of how much better you could’ve played if you had triple the amount of thinking time. That’s like, triple the brain power.
Hey! I'm currently 900 elo and I'm always so scared of using my time because I'll eventually end up being low on time and may lose
@@bucketsarecoolrealExactly. Im also 900 elo and every time i sit there and think my time gets low and my opponent has like 5 minutes left
He was still in the middlegame though?
@@j_ray01 I lost three freaking games wheremy opponent simply used all of his 10 mins to checkmate me. He had 1 min and I had 8
@@ghostoflego3390time to change
"Guess wot mo*****fu*****" gave you the confidence of 3000 elo 🤣
Your analysis of the e4 d5 opening is hilarious, keep it up
This was the funniest shit I've seen a while...
The finishing was really good for 600 elo 👍
I mean, rook can block bishop. And both of them missed it.
@@ศกรโสมาภา fr i saw that too and im only 400 elo lol
@@ItzPato a 600 elo wont sac a rook for bishop
@@ศกรโสมาภา knight takes rook looks like a good line to win back a lot of material there, I think it's still a winning idea anyways even w/o ending in mate
Me a 900 at midnight trying to recover my 5 losing streak
It was great to see how he has a lot of ideas and understanding of the game (about development, blocking pieces, etc...) but don't know which ideas to prioritize.
Once he had one idea that he had to follow through, he did that really well and ended up with a nice result.
Congrats on the beautiful ending
iconic bro. iconic.
very entertaining commentary, you should keep doing more of these
Dude! You're freaking hilarious, and as someone who just got in to chess and has finally surrendered to learning the sequential aspects of it and whatnot, your narrations are just so relatable. That was so funny how you called the bishop doing fancy shmancy moves and how sometimes I think a stupid elo opponent just isn't seeing something but in reality I just suck cheeks and am about to lose to a pawn. Subscribed and can't wait to casually enjoy your content.😂
0:24, i can definitely see why letting him get the queen to the centre looks bad, but the queen is actually misplaced there because it can be attacked so easily. For example after he takes the pawn with the queen, your next move can be attacking his queen with knight c3, then the queen will have to awkwardly scurry away and you can develop the rest of your pieces very easily and have a very nice game
Actually (☝️🤓) the Scandinavian is literally an opening made to support the queen going out there, so it is technically not misplaced if you follow the theory well. If you do, both sides (not just White) will have a pretty equal game. I bring this up because the Scandi is a little uncommon in low rank games, meaning his opponent definitely prepared a little theory at least (usually you see the King's Pawn Game rather than a Scandi so he definitely did it on purpose), so he definitely expected to have his queen out.
Or he wanted to play a Portuguese Gambit which is even rarer but still...
@@yeetrepublic9142 yes, in the Scandi black aims to support the misplaced queen with either moving it straight back to d8 (which creates a pretty solid yet unambitious game imo) or plays moves like c6 to give the queen comfortable retreating squares in the qa5 variation, but the queen is still misplaced nonetheless, as it almost always has to move elsewhere (often multiple times) before meaningfully contributing to any of blacks ideas.
yes i agree that black knew he was getting the queen out, and i agree it isnt a terrible opening, im just saying that taking the pawn on move 2 is by far the best move
@@yeetrepublic9142bro I’m 300 elo and I encounter the Scandinavian almost every game ☠️☠️☠️
I love your choice of words
Bro i laughed way hard when you said i was panicking like any other dude and gave a check
Amazing commentary. Finally someone who actually explains the thought process
LMAO! Great stuff!
I love how you set it up, and he just ignores it... so utter and completely.
So you move a pawn to catch his eye. That's insane, but I completely get it. And he's like "Oh, that... well, nope." LMAO!
So out of spite, "I was sac'ing this anyways... EFF YOU!" to take the Knight and LOSE YOUR ROOK. But it did what you needed, cleared that space for your 2nd Bishop.
Well freaking done.
Holy shit man, be careful, Magnus may start another cheating allegation.
Kramnik
@@EnverHalilHoxha1917 so real
Crammed nick
As a 1200 rated player. I didn't even look for that mating sequence, that was insane man
Never doubted you for a second
I'm an 1800 (vids on my channel with proof), and this was and interesting analysis of a game. The opening was hilarious to watch because it was as simple as exd5. The idea is when he takes his queen out you respond with developing all of your pieces while he fiddles with his queen. I also liked the ideas in the middlegame where you created checkmate threats. In the end it was just ggwp.
Why is taking f5 bad/ worse?
@@erik4177after e4 d5, there is no taking on f5
@@erik4177 I think he's saying after 1. e4 d5 the main move is 2. exd5. After 2. Bd3 (as in the game) f5? just blunders a pawn, and exf5 would have been a good move there.
A bit hard to see, but after the dark bishop check, he could have blocked w the rook, at the end of 'takes with knight' 'takes with pawn' and 'takes back with bishop' it's just winning a pawn.
Still a good plan overall, very good finish for 600
Bishop is protecting d6 as well
@@pepijnstreng4643 ik
@@pepijnstreng4643he’s already down loads of material
After Nxd6 exd6, you can capture the knight on f6 for free. But black is still up an exchange and two pawns there.
@@oishiine6781Oh yeah, missed that
This video made me cry laughing, good shit bro
"I'm not sure if I gain tempo, or what tempo even is"
fucking hell this guy's literally me
Bro made 1 brilliant and 2 great moves by sacking the rook in 3 moves I'm pretty sure
Honestly impressed by your grand master plan, good job
Honestly, good job finding that Checkmate. I'm around 900, and I probably wouldn't have seen that!
I am a terrible player and I saw it. How come you didn't see it it was obvious cause black blundered Castling Queen side instead of King side.
As a 1700 elo rated guy that was a master plan and played out as a master piece
Unironically the most helpful chess analysis I've seen
6:20 excellent idea and nice it worked, but the dude had a chance to block the initial bishop check with a rook and you would be just down a rook (if you took the rook in final position)
Holy shit, you perfectly captured my thoughts during a game, thats so cool
5:11 "So I don't know if he missed it or he sees all this fuck shit" ahh best chess analysis ever
Its impressive that a 600 elo player spotted the tactics at the end and the sacrificing of the rook, must be the result is of puzzles and training
You have potential 😉
I was genuinely excited taking that journey with you through that end game. Awesome stuff lol
Bruh im subscribing after that. Never seen 1 of ur videos but this was funny and awesome
i can't express how relatable this video video is. literally, every word is so pristinely relatable to, as if i were hearing my own thoughts. with the exception of the check mate part. i can only dream that i will be able to witness something like that ever again, not even in my own game, but whoever's.
Fantastic tactic at the end for a 600!
haha unfortunately it doesn’t work his opponent has rd6 multiple times
I need more of this guy. Great storytelling!
The funny thing is, Rd6 would have completely stopped your checkmating attack (although, after they played g6 that would have still allowed you to win their Knight if Nxd6, exd6) and they would have come out of it up a pawn in material despite giving back the Rook (their King would have still been very open so there might have been tactical opportunities and definitely a positional advantage as long as they can't leverage their undeveloped material lead, but I don't see an immediately deadly threat against them as a 1600, so go ask an 1800 or a 2000).
Bro at the middlegame I couldnt stop laughing that was such a fun match to watch😂. Keep it up buddy
This is FR the most relatable guy on the planet 🌎 😂😂
Especially this part😅 1:37
you may not like it but this is what peak performance looks like
The wild part is the plan doesn’t work if your opponent blocks the bishop check with their rook, but it still worked!
I guess then he could take the rook with the knight and if the pawn takes the knight, he can take the knight with bishop. Trading a rook and a knight for a knight seems solid and would leave the game a completion between a rook and a bishop (with the king trapped in the corner) versus two bishops with a king that is free to move. White’s pawn structure is fucked tho
@@alanpage4075its losing if blacks blocks with rook
fucking love this, only a minute in but him explaining the opening and how confused he is and the way he says "horrible mistake" after queen to b2 fucking love this video sm
Has Gotham or a similar RUclipsr reacted to this video, i would very much love to see that.
Not that I know about, but I would very much be okay with that LMAO
@@OutrightIgnite you need to get in his stream and get him to react to it
Your unfiltered kind of commentary is soo pleasant to listen to. A breath of fresh air in an ocean of all the censorship.
Magic - great finish!
It’s always great to see a reckless rook sacrifice actually pay off.
Ok, this was a lot more entertaining to watch than I thought it would be when I saw 69 (nice) views.
Damn u were here at 69 views
I've decided to glaze this channel 🤚✋
💦 😳
this is the only yt video ever that got me talking irl tf is this
Actually beatiful finishing combination.
This was very fun!
Bro panicked so hard he increases his rating + 1000 at that moment
This is funnier than regular chess tbh 😂
This is exactly my games. 0 understanding of openings, one horrificly stupid blunder, and then a single beautiful tactic executed with precision for the ages.
Lol thats too good this opening made me laugh hard
I absolutly love the whole video! Its like He Is in my head listening to all my thoughs 😄
Brilliant plan for mate
This was so funny and relatable i genuinely laughed out loud. So good
If after E4 black plays D5 you should always immediately take with your pawn because if the queen takes back you can bring your knight to C3 to attack the queen. Then the queen will most likely give a check on E4 but then you bring your Bishop to E2 to block it and keep attacking the queen because if you keep attacking the queen black will have to keep moving it well you get really good development.
Also you are really damn good at making attacks
Also also the structure thing with the bishop is called fianchettoing
here's how you pronounce it because it's a bit of a doozy
ruclips.net/video/jg5UQl1YaB8/видео.htmlsi=_bW1WAke7kuOEVEB
Honestly the best postgame commentary I’ve ever seen
I just LOVE this video.
That checkmate pattern is tremendously good - the rest is... well, it can be improved :D
I learned a lot from this video alone compare to hikaru or even Gotham. This calls for a subs... Bring more of such analysis 👍
Impressive finish, horrifying start
He gambled on the opponent being so bad that he misses that mate. Now that's a gambler.
I love this video bc everything else I’ve seen is players who know all the strategies… As a beginner player, understanding the thought process and seeing mistakes is a lot more useful for me!
That was a crazy checkmate! Well played!
These are the chess analysis I need in my life - relatable asf, subbed
That ending was fucking insane actually. Many 1000+ elo players can't even find stuff like that. Going from blundering over and over to finding a 7 move sequence leading to checkmate is crazy.
5:26 The thing is your game calculations are way better than any other 600 elos. As an 1100 Elo player, I would have seen all those moves only after taking the bishop check. But I also saw the thing that if rook on d8 blocks the check then the checkmate is preventative and black ends up with more material.
re5 kxe5 bxe5 rd6 bxd6 and exd6
That part where they didn't take the rook with the knight is so relatable. You make this big smart plan and it's just that one possibility you didn't think about that ends up happening
I searched up "playing against 600 ELO" because I keep losing, then I see the first 20 seconds of this video quite literally describing my exact thoughts on this particular move in that particular order
That final plan was just insanely smart, this man is the real undercover Magnus Carlsen.
You were both moving so fast at the beginning, I thought it was a 3 minute blitz game.
This guys the final boss of 600’s
As a 1200ish elo, I wouldn't be able to see that rook sac following with mate in 4
This was brilliant bro! Thanks so much for sharing this most entertaining insight into some thought processes that you are experiencing at your current early level of practical chess understanding. I’m a Chess Coach (around 2250 elo USCF) and stuff like this is pure gold for old Patzers like myself to help us focus on the right elements in creating & teaching a lesson! I’ll probably watch this a few more times and then make a lesson plan to address some of the more naturally confusing choices and directions you so humorously highlighted early in the video. Great Stuff! PS. If your looking for some free tips just let me know in the comments. Peace
3:39
"Or what tempo even is" so real
This was great lol, enjoyed it till the end!😂✊🏻
"I just check the king cuz that will get me out of all my fucking problems" most relatable chess analysis I've ever heard
This was the best Video i have seen in a while
I'm here for the ride. You went Sherlock Homie in the middle game.