With a focal distance of 35mm, I have two, or, three lenses. The present one, a Contax Carl Zeiss f/1.4 (that I will do a review of it), and next to them the MIR1 37mm f/2.8, Version of Brusell's Grand Prix award winner (it's to be reviewed too). I'm not sure about the present lens being too one of the winners of the same Expo of 1958. Can anyone of you confirm this? By the way, recording this lens over my coffee table was taken by the Contax Carl Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 and another one of the same maker. Saying this, you already guessed it. 焦距為 35mm，我有兩個或三個鏡頭。 本鏡頭, Contax Carl Zeiss f/1.4（我將對其進行評測），之後MIR1 37mm f/2.8獲獎布魯塞爾大獎的版本（也將進行評測）。我不確定現在的鏡頭是否也是 1958 年同一屆布魯塞爾世博會的獲獎者之一。你們中可以證實這一點嗎？順便說一句，在我的咖啡桌上錄製本鏡頭是用 Contax Carl Zeiss 35mm f/1.4， 我還是用多一個同一製造商的鏡頭來拍攝的。說到這裡，你已經猜到了。
If you love the rendering of its bokeh maybe try a Jupiter 8 that's cheaper and easier to find in the market, no matter a normal one or Red V edition (just ad a polariser). The design, it's a "Y". I could do more if I'm not running out of time.
I agree with you, the front element is a magnifying glass for the rear element, removed, is like an ugly macro, you can use other lenses less precious for this purpose. My concern is this lens will come "expensive" if accidentally broke it. It's not a Helios that went into thousands of production. Production time was only from 1958 to 1963 aimed to be paired with the K, then after, from 1959 to 1962 was introduced another 35mm f/3.5, a very slow lens with incomparable bokeh. I will always handle this lens with care. Thanks for watching.🙂
With a focal distance of 35mm, I have two, or, three lenses. The present one, a Contax Carl Zeiss f/1.4 (that I will do a review of it), and next to them the MIR1 37mm f/2.8, Version of Brusell's Grand Prix award winner (it's to be reviewed too). I'm not sure about the present lens being too one of the winners of the same Expo of 1958. Can anyone of you confirm this? By the way, recording this lens over my coffee table was taken by the Contax Carl Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 and another one of the same maker. Saying this, you already guessed it.
焦距為 35mm，我有兩個或三個鏡頭。 本鏡頭, Contax Carl Zeiss f/1.4（我將對其進行評測），之後MIR1 37mm f/2.8獲獎布魯塞爾大獎的版本（也將進行評測）。我不確定現在的鏡頭是否也是 1958 年同一屆布魯塞爾世博會的獲獎者之一。你們中可以證實這一點嗎？順便說一句，在我的咖啡桌上錄製本鏡頭是用 Contax Carl Zeiss 35mm f/1.4， 我還是用多一個同一製造商的鏡頭來拍攝的。說到這裡，你已經猜到了。
The special magic of this vintage lens works well in night scenes on an old Fuji body...
found your channel yesterday, really a gem for ones who love vintage glass like me!
awesome review of a rare lenses.
Thank you.
One of my favorite lenses , great video 👍 , thank you)
I have to thank you too. This lens is rare in terms of wasteful overuse, which means, it doesn't come cheap to my collection.
Quite pleasing Bokeh, also the design is interesting!
If you love the rendering of its bokeh maybe try a Jupiter 8 that's cheaper and easier to find in the market, no matter a normal one or Red V edition (just ad a polariser). The design, it's a "Y". I could do more if I'm not running out of time.
@@red_code I love the bokeh and I like this focal length so I'll definitely search for the Jupiter 8! Thanks for the recommendation!
removing the front element of the lens allows for a reduction of mfd.
I agree with you, the front element is a magnifying glass for the rear element, removed, is like an ugly macro, you can use other lenses less precious for this purpose. My concern is this lens will come "expensive" if accidentally broke it. It's not a Helios that went into thousands of production. Production time was only from 1958 to 1963 aimed to be paired with the K, then after, from 1959 to 1962 was introduced another 35mm f/3.5, a very slow lens with incomparable bokeh. I will always handle this lens with care. Thanks for watching.🙂
Who says mm?
Hello, I'm lost in your comment. Thank you.