Epistemology; the study of knowledge, comes from two words: Epistēmē, which is Greek for knowledge. And Ology, which is Latin for... knowledge. I cannot conceive another word that better describes the beauty and lunacy of the English language.
1:43 - I don't think that metaphysics requires us to adopt an externalist framework, does it? "Out there in the real world?" Or else internalists would be incapable of even holding their own position. They can't be internalists because metaphysics is the study of the real, external world, right?
@@Dr.DonAshe in that respect wouldn't that contradict what you said, how you said someone can't simply perceive a chillegon by looking at it and saying yeah that's a chillegon...? Idk what you meant exactly... because if someone told you what a chillegon is, i figured one could be considered capable of perceiving it by simply looking (if that entails counting the points also)
@@timesn7774 You can use both means to perceive anything. The point is to understand the definition of rationalism as a means to knowledge. Remember, even if you sit down with a chiliagon and counted each side to arrive at 1000, you are still defining it by a numerical symbol, namely "1000" which is a rational thought. So sometimes we use the method of rationalism to move forward in our knowledge of our world, rather than taking the time to count one thousand side every time we see a chiliagon in order to verify what it is.
@@Dr.DonAshe Ah i see what you mean so when you or i see a chillegon you would consider it, perceiving one? Or conceiving one? Or objectively seeing one? Just wondering how you would give a term to someone seeing one and all the while knowing it is one.
Very lucidly explained 👌
Sir can you create more philo terms videos.
This video is pretty good. Thank you so much.
Thank you you help me .
Epistemology; the study of knowledge, comes from two words:
Epistēmē, which is Greek for knowledge.
And
Ology, which is Latin for... knowledge.
I cannot conceive another word that better describes the beauty and lunacy of the English language.
Very helpful. Thank you.
1:43 - I don't think that metaphysics requires us to adopt an externalist framework, does it? "Out there in the real world?" Or else internalists would be incapable of even holding their own position. They can't be internalists because metaphysics is the study of the real, external world, right?
I can percieve a Chilegon if i use reason to count the points
Well said!
@@Dr.DonAshe in that respect wouldn't that contradict what you said, how you said someone can't simply perceive a chillegon by looking at it and saying yeah that's a chillegon...? Idk what you meant exactly... because if someone told you what a chillegon is, i figured one could be considered capable of perceiving it by simply looking (if that entails counting the points also)
@@timesn7774 You can use both means to perceive anything. The point is to understand the definition of rationalism as a means to knowledge. Remember, even if you sit down with a chiliagon and counted each side to arrive at 1000, you are still defining it by a numerical symbol, namely "1000" which is a rational thought. So sometimes we use the method of rationalism to move forward in our knowledge of our world, rather than taking the time to count one thousand side every time we see a chiliagon in order to verify what it is.
@@Dr.DonAshe Ah i see what you mean so when you or i see a chillegon you would consider it, perceiving one? Or conceiving one? Or objectively seeing one? Just wondering how you would give a term to someone seeing one and all the while knowing it is one.
The Holy Spirit of the Lord will give you knowledge and wisdom beyond human capabilities
The Koki have you got yours?
Amen 🙏🏽
false