Great 3D printed speakers!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
  • Finally I am getting somewhere! I need to build a small subwoofer (6,5" or 4" driver) to complement these speakers. And perhaps add a DSP-module or go old school with an analog line level crossover. (Will try out both)
    STLs will be published (free) when I have completed the subwoofer and done some more listening tests. Subscribe to keep track of my progress!
    Update:
    STLs in the description on this video: • DIY-project with 3D pr...
    Audio clips/samples:
    Quartet, studio recording with a wonderful Steinway grand piano: • Great 3D printed speak...
    Female vocalist, my home recording. Singing to backingtrack: • Great 3D printed speak...
    Channel mentioned in the video:
    / @diy-audio
    Dayton PS95-8 3-1/2" full range driver:
    www.soundimpor...

Комментарии • 24

  • @keatonjones6115
    @keatonjones6115 Месяц назад +15

    If you havent stumbled across the Hexibase youtube channel, i could highly reccodmend. He's a sound engineer and has sooo many awesome 3d printable designs. If nothing else will surely inspire some ideas!

  • @ubacow7109
    @ubacow7109 22 дня назад +1

    I wish more companies used colorful surrounds instead of the typical dull black ones

  • @kesor6
    @kesor6 Месяц назад +6

    You could print this speaker standing at 45 degrees to the bed, then you wouldn't need any supports at all because all the angles are at 45 degrees to the bed and there are no big overhangs.

    • @v4projects
      @v4projects  Месяц назад +1

      Thanks for watching! Could be worth a try. Keep in mind that there is a port inside the vented version and a "brace" in the closed version. And there is a large opening for the backplate and speaker driver.

    • @v4projects
      @v4projects  Месяц назад

      I had to try this in the slicer :-) It did suggest some supports even for 45 degrees orientation. Print time 18:46 (3 mins longer then my print). 716 grams of filament vs 761 in my print. Interesting result and not what I expected.

    • @kesor6
      @kesor6 Месяц назад +2

      @@v4projects if the port is perpendicular to the front face, then it is also at 45 degrees.
      But I would also modify the model a little, and give it a 45degree face at the bottom instead of a sharp-ish corner. Then you don't need to support the structure, as it has a "leg".

  • @mdavisyates
    @mdavisyates Месяц назад +1

    I'm using the dayton PS95-8 in a build right now, its amazing how much more high end detail they provide compared to the coaxial!

  • @delscoville
    @delscoville Месяц назад +1

    My 1980 Ford Fiesta didn't have speakers in the doors, they were in the back seat area, and actually sounded quite good.

    • @v4projects
      @v4projects  Месяц назад +1

      @delscoville I had an Ford Escort. Two Kenwood speakers mounted in the rear shelf. First night the car was parked outside, someone broke the window and stole the Kenwoods. Never had a Fiesta, thanks for fact checking :-) i would like to add that even back then, most people preferred Kenwood or Clarion speakers, not Roadstar.

  • @impuls60
    @impuls60 Месяц назад +1

    I'd recommend you look for drivers with a smooth transition from the cone and all the way to your 3d printed box. Otherwise you get huge diffraction peaks/dipps in the frequency. Flushmounting is essential and large 3cm radius+ rounded corners on front baffle will also give way smoother vocals. Drivers with inverted rubber will often sound better because of the no rubber bulge creating diffraction effects. I would love to see some Markaudio drivers in these boxes since they are well made and theres soundclips comparing a ton of full range on youtube showing the general sound one can expect from all these drivers.

    • @v4projects
      @v4projects  Месяц назад

      I am currently printing some boxes for the Markaudio drivers. It’s a scaled up version. (About 20% larger and sealed, orherwise identical shape and driver placement

  • @Speedgaming802
    @Speedgaming802 Месяц назад +1

    awesome

  • @beatliner1009
    @beatliner1009 Месяц назад

    Try printing with 100% infill. For me it sounds way better. Also filaments with carbon fibres gives less resonances and more natural sound.

    • @v4projects
      @v4projects  Месяц назад +1

      If you watched part 2 you could see me try out micro cement/Jesmonite. It didn’t improve the sound. The speaker driver was too bad and the limiting factor. I’ll compare one box with cement and one without but with the same Dayton driver in my next video. Thanks for watching!

  • @devinpenny8615
    @devinpenny8615 18 дней назад

    Look up DIY perks, he designed a powered hifi setup that I would love to see someone make

    • @v4projects
      @v4projects  18 дней назад +1

      I think I have seen some of his stuff. With 4,5 mill+ subscribers he seem to have a slightly higher budget than me :-) Interestingly enough he had a similar idea when it comes to improving the 3D printed enclosures ruclips.net/video/XEspOD1NHr0/видео.html Impressive project. I think Jesmonite is a better solution for filling the speakers.

    • @devinpenny8615
      @devinpenny8615 18 дней назад +1

      @@v4projects That is the one! I am building this and not sure if I will finish it, but your videos are teaching me about Jesmonite and motivate me to push to the end. I am trying to learn about the electronics aspects of diy speakers and I do not see many videos that overview electronic components, and or discusses how to select them.

  • @davidperry4013
    @davidperry4013 Месяц назад

    The Dayton full-range drivers sound much better than the road star in terms of details and crispness but it's a little too bright for my tastes.

    • @v4projects
      @v4projects  Месяц назад

      I agree, it needs some correction. Too bright.

  • @audiarmadhani
    @audiarmadhani Месяц назад

    Great project! Do you have the STL shared somewhere?

    • @v4projects
      @v4projects  Месяц назад

      Thanks for asking! I will publish the STLs as soon as I have completed the subwoofer and done some more listening tests of that combo. (currently printing two sizes of subwoofers). I think most people would prefer to use a compact sub with these speakers. This will be a low cost build, but it sure uses some filament! 760 grams for each speaker. 580 grams for the small sub and about 1,3 kg for the bigger subwoofer.