And in another universe Simon takes over every RUclips channel and run the Monopoly on RUclips and is a billionaire and found a way to upload his conscience into a cybernetic body and has became immortal running RUclips for all times for his minions
in one other universe Simon has very long hair on his head and is shaved…. imagine that weird universe… pigs fly probably in it and cows give chocolate milk and we are all slaves of the crab people also his last name is Shouter, Simon Shouter… also hes a communist and likes Lord of the Rings lets call the long haired and shaved Simon the evil Simon Shouter…
There is a multiverse where Simon has hair and let Danny out of the basement? No...statistically that's still as much of a likelihood as the Scarlett Johansson chance.
I love how Simon can get savage at times, but also not take himself too serious. Also, his reactions to some of the script given him. Love all of your content, man. Always feel like I get entertained and learn something. Win win.
It is my estimation that if a traversable infinite multiverse did exist, we wouldn't have to worry about it, because in at least one of them, some horrible despot would have already crossed through to all the other multiverses and destroyed them so his could be the only one.
although I want to believe in a multiverse, when does a dream become just a dream, one could argue that fiction and science fiction are portals to other dimensions and multiverses, but aren't they just dreams. but then again we don't understand the brain enough to discount that if we can dream it, it may exist somewhere.
Very interesting video. I love all of your channels. It’s not often that you someone can both entertain and educate.. you do both perfectly! Well done Simon and team 😊👏🏻💯🙌🏻
There may never be a way to prove if other universes exist, but the best clues may be in Quantum Mechanics. I have always believed in the Infinite Earths Theory even before I know a name for it as I believe that every discission branches to a different reality and all of these happen simultaneously. I am also sure there is an Earth that is still ruled by dinosaurs because Earth was never hit by an asteroid that devastated life. I also believe there is a universe where Simon and Scarlett are in an alley sharing a needle.
Here, animated Simon runs from the one eyed tentacle monster, in another he's married to it, and in a third he is the tentacle monster, sharing a needle with Scarlett Johansen.
This channel is wild I like it, since BB got it’s nuts chopped off this is my new real blaze zone 😂. The OG BB is just like a podcast now and Simon sits down and just reads not true blazing
what about a serial multiverse? What I mean is, what if there is only 1 universe at a time, but it is alternating - there is a big bang, the universe expands but starts to slow down until gravity pulls it all back into a a single point which then explodes into a new big bang which creates a new universe that might be different from the last one.
In the multiverse who is me? Or nature vs nurture? The closest one might expect is, of course, identical twins, but even with the same inherited trait and learned behaviors, they are still different. Thus should a me, from a different universe, is not me, but is more, a weird identical twin?
I think the sensation of Deja Vu is caused by the brief synchronization in time of an action performed by an individual and their alternate self from another universe
3:20 - Chapter 1 - 4 levels of multiverse 3:45 - 1st level 6:00 - 2nd level 6:55 - 3rd level 9:05 - 4th level 9:55 - Chapter 2 - Why does anyone believe this ? 12:35 - Chapter 3 - Doing science backwards 14:40 - Chapter 4 - Dangerous for science ? 17:10 - Wrap up PS: Knowing the Whistlerverse and the many personas Simon employs, i can definitively affirm that it exists
Simon, I hope you see this. You’re my favorite RUclips personality. I know you work lots of channels but you are just so enjoyable to watch on all of them.
I would love to see a piece on the Three Laws of Robotics, Asimov "rules". Mainly because they keep getting brought up after the robot broke that kid's finger in a chess match, as if they are actual "laws", not something created by a science fiction writer as a basis for many of his books and stories.
It's a nice idea, but even in Asimov's work it only applied to sapient robots that think for themselves as opposed to just running through a programmed tree of options, a built-in safety to prevent the things shown in Terminator and The Matrix and Westworld &c. Current robots, it's on the human writing the code.
Ah, but sapient robots or androids- what if they began writing their own code? Robots improving their own AI, using pure logic, with no human unput? Would they still follow Asimov's Three Laws (which are flawed, as it is)? Or would they ditch them and create their own laws? Would we have Data or T-800?
@@striker8961 This video shows it- the chess playing robot grabbed a 7-year old kid's finger while they were playing chess. Broke the kid's finger: ruclips.net/video/fixQWq3HNZg/видео.html
13:00 a big smile slowly creeps across my face as Simon begins to reacquaint us all with paradigm shifts in science. The one that's coming is a big'n !:-)
I am offended SIR!!!! I am neither dumb or very young lol, it's not outside the realms of possibility. A few weeks ago many people thought that galaxies take billions of years to form, but that has now been reduced to millions of years. Thanks to JWST, imagine what we will know in another 1000 years ( thank you dark ages ) BTW I love your videos 😀
Ahhh the age old rivalry between science and philosophy, or as I call it: the battle between Eggheads and Thinkers. Also, I could *realllllly* start a flame-war on this with...other topics...but I’m not in the mood today.
Human organs are now a thing. Star Trek teleportation could kind of work. We just need to remove the ban for experiments on human clones to work out the memory and habits transfer.
I think it's ok for 'we don't know and can't prove this one way or the other yet' to be a valid scientific stance. It's a good way to avoid rampant scepticism which in my opinion is incredibly unscientific in itself. Also as a side note I was interested while watching this video to realise that the multiple universe theory is entirely separate from the idea of additional spatial dimensions. It's so great to live in a world (perhaps one of many worlds even) so full of possibilities.
Where the script talks about there must be other universes because ours is perfectly suited to humans is a logical fallacy. In actuality, humans are evolved to suit the specific narrow parameters of the environment here on Earth; not the other way round. A consistent application of scientific method is needed throughout the script.
The multiverse concept is fascinating. The Mandela Effect, the people who lost their minds when they fired up the Hadron at Cern....thanks for the script Kevin, great writing as usual!!! Im a big sci fi and fantasy fiction fan, the "hard science" theories are a bit harder for my small brain are fascinating but mind bending, but the more fantasy rewrites of history are just plain fun sometimes, like the Whatif Machine in Futurama, or an "alternate history" series...
FWIW, It doesn't have anything to do with the Mandela effect; there is no way to end up in the "wrong" universe, there is no way one could possibly know which universe one's in, and the number of total universes is beyond anything we could possibly comprehend. To be clear: A given universe "splits" every time there is a quantum event (any interaction between subatomic particles, including a measurement). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Event_(particle_physics) I don't think Simon gave it a fair shake. Does it really make any more sense to propose that a given subatomic particle doesn't have an actual location until it's measured?
Another thing that a multiverse could allow is Faster than Light travel without the risk of causing causal loops (aka paradoxes), because if you travelled back in time and altered the timeline the alteration would merely be swallowed by another universe, instead of making the main one inconsistent.
Technically we “could” find evidence if, and only if, another universe impacted our own. The result would likely (speculation at best) leave a so-called “cold spot” where no matter is found cause it was pushed out of the way. This is extremely unlikely and only possible in “certain” types of multiverse so it may as well be impossible to test. On top of that even IF we were to find such a “cold-spot” it’s not even necessarily from such an event as it could be explained away as large quantum fluctuations being exponentially expressed in matter spread as the universe expanded.
Sometimes i watch and then i will think "but what about THIS theory?"... and then I remember I'm watching a fun science channel, and not one of the field specific physics lectures I watch lol. But god do I miss Star Trek's dedication to putting in real effort when it came to the science. The new stuff hurts my fucking soul. It isn't the only part of the older trek series that they left behind, but it feels so empty without.
And that's the beauty of Stience. never satisfied that we've figured it all out, even our understanding of gravity isn't completely off the table, as far as at the Macro and Quantum levels.
I think that the multiverses aren’t off at some infinite distance, I think they’re right here with life forms and everything but they have more or less dimensions and we can’t perceive them.
There are types of multiverse where it would be possible to observe the effects of another “universe” forces like gravity could leak across from other dimensions (a possible cause of dark matter), edge effects from other “universes” which share some coordinates in say spacial dimensions with our observable universe have been proposed a lot of them would be visible with gamma ray astronomy. One way of looking at it is we could be in the same position as someone proposing a heliocentric solar system with stars being other suns before the invention of the telescope. We can’t just look up and see the moons of Jupiter orbiting it, we can’t measure angles in the sky finely enough to observe parallax and get an idea of the distance to the sun etc etc.
When it comes to the question of if there are multiple universes, I think about it like this name anything in our universe that there is only one of lol. It's definitely not a definite answer I do believe if you see one of something there are probably more than one of them.
Okay. At least the Level 3 Multiverse is somewhat testable... But its a Major Engineering feat. There are some recent papers released in the last 2 years from multiple PhD's (Eric Lenz, Shaun Fell, Lavina Heisenberg to name a few) That show Positive Energy FTL warp field solutions are possible within GR. And that FTL Travel does not break causality in a Many Worlds universe. So "Simply" all we gotta do is Engineer a Warp drive Ship capable of theoretical FTL speeds. And see if it goes FTL. Or just relativistic. If it goes FTL, multiverse. If it just goes relativistic, Single universe.
I saw some physicist, maybe Michio Kaku, talking about how it is possible there is a univers where 1+1=3. So if that is true, then other universes could actually have vastly different laws of physics...and then maybe "superheros" could be a thing. Seems unlikey but still...
...I wouldn't doubt there is a universe where English evolved so that two equals (***) things and three equals (**) things. Wow. That is actually really hard to describe.
@@ravenwraith1017language would definitley be possible to have changes…but this physicist was literally talking math. I can’t even wrap my head around how that would work. I understand string theory before I can understand that. Lol.
It is a bit presumptuous to talk about multiverse as basically a belief system because lack of experimentation but string theory is in a similar situation. Just has pretty math to justify its belief. Which really just a pretty idea.
I am very upset that the entire video wasn’t just an extended version of the three-minute intro of high-energy ranting for the entire eighteen minutes.
So what you're saying, is that somewhere out there, I have just uploaded this video to RUclips. While Simon watches it after a line of "battle powder" while being locked in Danny's basement?
I believe in a virtual multiverse. A single finite universe that happens over and over in every possible way until this exact universe reoccurs. As on a long enough time scale every possibility becomes a certainty every possibility is virtually real.
5'32'': "There should be an observable universe inside our infinitely large universe that is identical to our own roughly 10^10^115 meters away from us." 1. Observable to whom? 2. That estimate depends solely on presupposition that the metrics for any physical phenomena within our Multiverse is discrete, i.e. may contain only a finite number of values within any finite volume of spacetime. If it is continuous instead, this inference doesn't hold.
Simon: string theory posits that gravity can travel across universes. If so, that would provide a way to send signals between universes. And if signals can go, then a transporter could also transport someone between universes. All highly, highly, speculative.
The cinematic problem with the Multiverse is that it makes every decision irrelevant: there is always another universe where it turned out "right" and the things that happened in one film can just be swept away by explaining that it happened in another strand of the multiverse.. and once they have used that explanation (spoiler alert: it's already happened) then nothing is fixed and I stop caring about what happens.
Alright let me try to break it down for you to where ever decision isn't irrelevant. To say there is only a yes no puts multiverse into a finite space. Only two branches on that growing tree of life. Instead consider how feelings can be different in a decisions making and for its desired outcome. So while you may have asked your wife to marry you because you felt like this was as good as it was gonna get for you. Vs you asked her because you were madly in love and couldnt spend a day without her. This continues not just a single branch from a single moments choice but now branches out like a tree into many many many branches. As someone who studied many religious texts but believes Science is our way of understanding the design god created. If that makes sense? So I couple them to ask why would god allow or even want a multiverse? Then I come to "God created us in his image." Thus we were all meant to become gods. To know everything to experience everything before we go and make our own. Or whatever end game god has planned for us. But if I wanted a soul to experience everyrhing life can give them in a 100 year span I am making a multiverse and that soul gets divided everytime it branches with choices and decisions. Originating with one soul and returning in one soul. So if you died in another multiverse that soul just empties into the pool until everything returns but instead of water you have wine 😏
@@laithamekir5778 That doesn't help me. Even if a God existed (and I'm pretty sure it doesn't) the "soul pool" would still be nonsensical. We can theorize about a multiverse at length but in the end it is how it's used in film that is relevant to my statement and in MCU's multiverse it appears very loosely defined so the writers can do whatever they want. That type of a multiverse makes they storytelling less compelling to me.
Развлечения
The multiverse is real, as each channel Simon owns is actually hosted by his multiversal variants, which is exactly how he makes all the content.
This also explains why he doesn’t always remember whether he’s covered a particular topic before. 😊
This is Canon
Sounds right to me.
He uses a quantum computer. 😅
And one of him they oddly replaced with Simon Cowell which freaked me out a bit
In another universe, Simon restrains himself to one channel and the RUclips Gods reward him for doing so
And in another universe Simon takes over every RUclips channel and run the Monopoly on RUclips and is a billionaire and found a way to upload his conscience into a cybernetic body and has became immortal running RUclips for all times for his minions
Also in another universe he lets Sam and Danny out the basement 🤣
@@StevenLockey NEVER! That is a constant in every universe!
in one other universe Simon has very long hair on his head and is shaved…. imagine that weird universe… pigs fly probably in it and cows give chocolate milk and we are all slaves of the crab people also his last name is Shouter, Simon Shouter… also hes a communist and likes Lord of the Rings
lets call the long haired and shaved Simon the evil Simon Shouter…
😂😂😂😂
Somewhere out there are universes where Simon is watching videos on RUclips presented by us, the audience 🤯
Allegedly.
Oh sh*t!!!🤔
Mind blown!
I'm glad I'm not in that version. I'm too lazy for all that mess
I read the same comment on an other of Simon's videos... Did I travel to another universe? 🧐😅
i was about to file a case but I saw allegedly 😢
I'll take a universe that doesn't have any ads or commercials. That would be a good multiverse to live in.
Ya just a word of mouth for a product.
Maybe that's just a subscriptions to paid RUclips will get you there?
But then we wouldn't have Simon, who as we all know, loves that sweet sweet ad revenue 😁
There is a multiverse where Simon has hair and let Danny out of the basement? No...statistically that's still as much of a likelihood as the Scarlett Johansson chance.
I love how Simon can get savage at times, but also not take himself too serious. Also, his reactions to some of the script given him. Love all of your content, man. Always feel like I get entertained and learn something. Win win.
i like how i'm getting more Simon a week than i could ever need :D
Aspen is really bringing out Simon's chaotic side.
It is my estimation that if a traversable infinite multiverse did exist, we wouldn't have to worry about it, because in at least one of them, some horrible despot would have already crossed through to all the other multiverses and destroyed them so his could be the only one.
Ryan Reynolds watched this and is now sad that you aren't keeping up on his life.
multiverse theory explains how simon manages to run so many youtubes accounts at once. he must have twins from other universes
Simon was animated AF in this video. Liked the info too. Another channel to subscribe to
What if each of Simon’s channels is hosted by Simons from different universes? That’s the only way he could do so many channels at the same time
although I want to believe in a multiverse, when does a dream become just a dream, one could argue that fiction and science fiction are portals to other dimensions and multiverses, but aren't they just dreams. but then again we don't understand the brain enough to discount that if we can dream it, it may exist somewhere.
Very interesting video. I love all of your channels. It’s not often that you someone can both entertain and educate.. you do both perfectly! Well done Simon and team 😊👏🏻💯🙌🏻
Whoever is editing these is doing a great job. I love the new channel, it's like a sci-fi brain blaze.
This channel is Brain Blaze crossed with Proper Simon and it’s amazing!
There may never be a way to prove if other universes exist, but the best clues may be in Quantum Mechanics. I have always believed in the Infinite Earths Theory even before I know a name for it as I believe that every discission branches to a different reality and all of these happen simultaneously. I am also sure there is an Earth that is still ruled by dinosaurs because Earth was never hit by an asteroid that devastated life. I also believe there is a universe where Simon and Scarlett are in an alley sharing a needle.
That means there's a universe where I sold them the heroin.
Here, animated Simon runs from the one eyed tentacle monster, in another he's married to it, and in a third he is the tentacle monster, sharing a needle with Scarlett Johansen.
@@BaronVonQuiplytrue
There's a universe where Truman recognized Vietnams independence and avoid one of history's grestest blunders.
This channel is wild I like it, since BB got it’s nuts chopped off this is my new real blaze zone 😂. The OG BB is just like a podcast now and Simon sits down and just reads not true blazing
Keep the videos coming Simon learning more from ur videos than I did at school and I've never been tempted to skip one, yet😮
Loving this new channel Simon & team! Keep up the good work!
That was again awesome but when I saw you running away from that monster I laughed so hard it hurt. Thank you 😂 I needed that 👍
Your BEST channel, man. Keep it up! & big thank you :-)
what about a serial multiverse? What I mean is, what if there is only 1 universe at a time, but it is alternating - there is a big bang, the universe expands but starts to slow down until gravity pulls it all back into a a single point which then explodes into a new big bang which creates a new universe that might be different from the last one.
In the multiverse who is me? Or nature vs nurture? The closest one might expect is, of course, identical twins, but even with the same inherited trait and learned behaviors, they are still different. Thus should a me, from a different universe, is not me, but is more, a weird identical twin?
Your delivery has improved immensely over the years. I find all of your channels informational and entertaining.
Just have to say the way you you do your thing is unique and awesome.....as Frank Carson said...its the way i tell em....keep up the great work mate
This is very quickly becoming my favorite SW channel.
I think the sensation of Deja Vu is caused by the brief synchronization in time of an action performed by an individual and their alternate self from another universe
3:20 - Chapter 1 - 4 levels of multiverse
3:45 - 1st level
6:00 - 2nd level
6:55 - 3rd level
9:05 - 4th level
9:55 - Chapter 2 - Why does anyone believe this ?
12:35 - Chapter 3 - Doing science backwards
14:40 - Chapter 4 - Dangerous for science ?
17:10 - Wrap up
PS: Knowing the Whistlerverse and the many personas Simon employs, i can definitively affirm that it exists
This is fantastic! Awesome channel. Now. Stargate Wormholes vs DS9 Wormhole video, when? Or Warp Drive science video, also when? :)
Just when I thought I had all the Simon Fact Boy channels, bam! One escaped me
Simon, I hope you see this. You’re my favorite RUclips personality. I know you work lots of channels but you are just so enjoyable to watch on all of them.
I would love to see a piece on the Three Laws of Robotics, Asimov "rules". Mainly because they keep getting brought up after the robot broke that kid's finger in a chess match, as if they are actual "laws", not something created by a science fiction writer as a basis for many of his books and stories.
It's a nice idea, but even in Asimov's work it only applied to sapient robots that think for themselves as opposed to just running through a programmed tree of options, a built-in safety to prevent the things shown in Terminator and The Matrix and Westworld &c. Current robots, it's on the human writing the code.
And if we’ve learned anything, it’s that humans are awful at writing code.
Ah, but sapient robots or androids- what if they began writing their own code? Robots improving their own AI, using pure logic, with no human unput? Would they still follow Asimov's Three Laws (which are flawed, as it is)? Or would they ditch them and create their own laws? Would we have Data or T-800?
Excuse me , a robot did what?
@@striker8961 This video shows it- the chess playing robot grabbed a 7-year old kid's finger while they were playing chess. Broke the kid's finger: ruclips.net/video/fixQWq3HNZg/видео.html
13:00 a big smile slowly creeps across my face as Simon begins to reacquaint us all with paradigm shifts in science. The one that's coming is a big'n !:-)
This has got to be the most blips I heard from one of your videos got to say its funny to hear
I am offended SIR!!!! I am neither dumb or very young lol, it's not outside the realms of possibility. A few weeks ago many people thought that galaxies take billions of years to form, but that has now been reduced to millions of years. Thanks to JWST, imagine what we will know in another 1000 years ( thank you dark ages ) BTW I love your videos 😀
Could you do an episode on lightsabres please? These videos are solid gold by the way 👌👌
Ahhh the age old rivalry between science and philosophy, or as I call it: the battle between Eggheads and Thinkers.
Also, I could *realllllly* start a flame-war on this with...other topics...but I’m not in the mood today.
Suggestion: How close are we to having real food replicators as seen in Star Trek The Next Generation? I know that 3D printer cookies are now a thing.
Human organs are now a thing. Star Trek teleportation could kind of work. We just need to remove the ban for experiments on human clones to work out the memory and habits transfer.
I think it's ok for 'we don't know and can't prove this one way or the other yet' to be a valid scientific stance. It's a good way to avoid rampant scepticism which in my opinion is incredibly unscientific in itself. Also as a side note I was interested while watching this video to realise that the multiple universe theory is entirely separate from the idea of additional spatial dimensions. It's so great to live in a world (perhaps one of many worlds even) so full of possibilities.
Hey! Hey! Do more of these right now! This channel has the potential to be epic!
really enjoyable video. the only thing I can ask if you can cut back on the wired and wonderful graphics
Weird?
Awesome as always :)
That intro was powered by a lot of .... ummm energy drinks
Love your new channel, Simon! But do you happen to sleep from to time ?
Is a mater of Harmonic signature, vibrational intensity.
Like a… symphony!
The music of the multiverse.🙏
Simon has multiple channels in this Universe, image how many there are in the multitude of multiverses!
By the way, a slight curve has been found in space/time. The universe is not infinite, but a closed system. Albeit an expanding one.
HOLY SHIT!!! LMAO 11:11 That's brutal!! Well played sir.
It's like you took the excited, coked-up (allegedly) Simon clone who used to host Brain Blaze and put him on this channel.
I have ADHD and I love fast paced videos but doggam Simon the energy here!
Where the script talks about there must be other universes because ours is perfectly suited to humans is a logical fallacy. In actuality, humans are evolved to suit the specific narrow parameters of the environment here on Earth; not the other way round. A consistent application of scientific method is needed throughout the script.
I'm torn on this channel. I love the subject of it, but some of the videos are so full of sound effects that it is distracting.
The multiverse concept is fascinating. The Mandela Effect, the people who lost their minds when they fired up the Hadron at Cern....thanks for the script Kevin, great writing as usual!!! Im a big sci fi and fantasy fiction fan, the "hard science" theories are a bit harder for my small brain are fascinating but mind bending, but the more fantasy rewrites of history are just plain fun sometimes, like the Whatif Machine in Futurama, or an "alternate history" series...
Thanks! I really wanted to include the Futurama machine somehow but couldn't get it in there
FWIW, It doesn't have anything to do with the Mandela effect; there is no way to end up in the "wrong" universe, there is no way one could possibly know which universe one's in, and the number of total universes is beyond anything we could possibly comprehend. To be clear: A given universe "splits" every time there is a quantum event (any interaction between subatomic particles, including a measurement).
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Event_(particle_physics)
I don't think Simon gave it a fair shake. Does it really make any more sense to propose that a given subatomic particle doesn't have an actual location until it's measured?
Another thing that a multiverse could allow is Faster than Light travel without the risk of causing causal loops (aka paradoxes), because if you travelled back in time and altered the timeline the alteration would merely be swallowed by another universe, instead of making the main one inconsistent.
Great new channel man! Also u deff have a problem lol.
Technically we “could” find evidence if, and only if, another universe impacted our own. The result would likely (speculation at best) leave a so-called “cold spot” where no matter is found cause it was pushed out of the way. This is extremely unlikely and only possible in “certain” types of multiverse so it may as well be impossible to test. On top of that even IF we were to find such a “cold-spot” it’s not even necessarily from such an event as it could be explained away as large quantum fluctuations being exponentially expressed in matter spread as the universe expanded.
Lol ok bud
Sometimes i watch and then i will think "but what about THIS theory?"... and then I remember I'm watching a fun science channel, and not one of the field specific physics lectures I watch lol. But god do I miss Star Trek's dedication to putting in real effort when it came to the science. The new stuff hurts my fucking soul. It isn't the only part of the older trek series that they left behind, but it feels so empty without.
And that's the beauty of Stience.
never satisfied that we've figured it all out, even our understanding of gravity isn't completely off the table, as far as at the Macro and Quantum levels.
Love Simon, love the editing
I think that the multiverses aren’t off at some infinite distance, I think they’re right here with life forms and everything but they have more or less dimensions and we can’t perceive them.
There are types of multiverse where it would be possible to observe the effects of another “universe” forces like gravity could leak across from other dimensions (a possible cause of dark matter),
edge effects from other “universes” which share some coordinates in say spacial dimensions with our observable universe have been proposed a lot of them would be visible with gamma ray astronomy.
One way of looking at it is we could be in the same position as someone proposing a heliocentric solar system with stars being other suns before the invention of the telescope. We can’t just look up and see the moons of Jupiter orbiting it, we can’t measure angles in the sky finely enough to observe parallax and get an idea of the distance to the sun etc etc.
I don't know about the multiverse, but with how many channels you appear in, I'm starting to believe in the MultiSimonWhistler
When it comes to the question of if there are multiple universes, I think about it like this name anything in our universe that there is only one of lol. It's definitely not a definite answer I do believe if you see one of something there are probably more than one of them.
This channel has major og brain blaze vibes.
That 3-minute intro is VERY Simon.
This by far has to be his best channel!!!!!
Okay. At least the Level 3 Multiverse is somewhat testable... But its a Major Engineering feat.
There are some recent papers released in the last 2 years from multiple PhD's (Eric Lenz, Shaun Fell, Lavina Heisenberg to name a few) That show Positive Energy FTL warp field solutions are possible within GR. And that FTL Travel does not break causality in a Many Worlds universe.
So "Simply" all we gotta do is Engineer a Warp drive Ship capable of theoretical FTL speeds. And see if it goes FTL. Or just relativistic. If it goes FTL, multiverse. If it just goes relativistic, Single universe.
Tricks on you Simon, I'm not wearing socks!
I saw some physicist, maybe Michio Kaku, talking about how it is possible there is a univers where 1+1=3. So if that is true, then other universes could actually have vastly different laws of physics...and then maybe "superheros" could be a thing. Seems unlikey but still...
...I wouldn't doubt there is a universe where English evolved so that two equals (***) things and three equals (**) things. Wow. That is actually really hard to describe.
@@ravenwraith1017language would definitley be possible to have changes…but this physicist was literally talking math. I can’t even wrap my head around how that would work. I understand string theory before I can understand that. Lol.
Van Swan Science has some staunch objections to your tone good sir!
It is a bit presumptuous to talk about multiverse as basically a belief system because lack of experimentation but string theory is in a similar situation. Just has pretty math to justify its belief. Which really just a pretty idea.
According to one paper there is no universe in which a star will appear naturally green to our eyes
The Cool Words channel, hosted by Prof. David Kipping, explains this is detail too in "The Star that can't exist."
Brilliant really interesting any chance you can try to explain the different sizes of infinity drives me nuts 🤯
I'm a little surprised more people haven't mentioned Sliders.
An obscure TV show from 30 or so years ago?
I finally found a movement that feels like we're getting somewhere. #demexit.
I'm not voting for Democrats until they curb the far left and all their bs
Somewhere there is a universe composed entirely of my missing socks...
How many channels do you have ?
There is a version of me, in the multiverse, wearing a different pair of socks?!… and clothes? Wow
Been a while since I've seen one of Simon's videos...has he started doing speed?
“Either young or very dumb.”
Skinner: Yes.
If there is a bright center of the multiverse, we're in the universe that's furthest from.
Damn, lighten up, mate! I guess there is always one misanthropic, nihilistic person.
I am very upset that the entire video wasn’t just an extended version of the three-minute intro of high-energy ranting for the entire eighteen minutes.
So what you're saying, is that somewhere out there, I have just uploaded this video to RUclips. While Simon watches it after a line of "battle powder" while being locked in Danny's basement?
That does it ... time to ask Scarlett Johansson out on a date. Let's put this multiverse thing to the test. :-)
I keep seeing your face in thumbnails Simon, and it’s ALWAYS a different channel.. WTF how many channels does this man have?!
The ‘now know’ at 7:45 was dangerously close to Nigel Thornberry. I can’t unhear it, neither should you.
So, today we learned there's no String and Multiverse theory but rather hypothesis.
Have you already done a video on the theory we are a computer simulation due to the double slot experiment?
I'm gonna die if I see a mint mobile commercial where at the end Ryan Reynolds goes, and btw, hi Simon 😂
I see a Simon from universe 2003.4-a7 has leaked into our universe. I am taking note of this and continuing to watch with interest.
I believe in a virtual multiverse. A single finite universe that happens over and over in every possible way until this exact universe reoccurs. As on a long enough time scale every possibility becomes a certainty every possibility is virtually real.
At the edge of our galaxy ,there is an observation of repetition.They can see the next universe to ours interaction with ours.
That Eels documentary is cool. Watch it if you can find it.
5'32'': "There should be an observable universe inside our infinitely large universe that is identical to our own roughly 10^10^115 meters away from us." 1. Observable to whom? 2. That estimate depends solely on presupposition that the metrics for any physical phenomena within our Multiverse is discrete, i.e. may contain only a finite number of values within any finite volume of spacetime. If it is continuous instead, this inference doesn't hold.
Simon: string theory posits that gravity can travel across universes.
If so, that would provide a way to send signals between universes.
And if signals can go, then a transporter could also transport someone between universes.
All highly, highly, speculative.
You’re right, it’s time I put the heroine down and got my life in order.
I just have to find which one of me picked up the heroine
To quote an episode of 'Rick and Morty's; "What about the universe where Hitler cures cancer? The answer is to not think about it."
3:04 Oh, well, you sure do know how to destroy my self esteem.
The cinematic problem with the Multiverse is that it makes every decision irrelevant: there is always another universe where it turned out "right" and the things that happened in one film can just be swept away by explaining that it happened in another strand of the multiverse.. and once they have used that explanation (spoiler alert: it's already happened) then nothing is fixed and I stop caring about what happens.
Alright let me try to break it down for you to where ever decision isn't irrelevant. To say there is only a yes no puts multiverse into a finite space. Only two branches on that growing tree of life. Instead consider how feelings can be different in a decisions making and for its desired outcome. So while you may have asked your wife to marry you because you felt like this was as good as it was gonna get for you. Vs you asked her because you were madly in love and couldnt spend a day without her. This continues not just a single branch from a single moments choice but now branches out like a tree into many many many branches.
As someone who studied many religious texts but believes Science is our way of understanding the design god created. If that makes sense? So I couple them to ask why would god allow or even want a multiverse? Then I come to "God created us in his image." Thus we were all meant to become gods. To know everything to experience everything before we go and make our own. Or whatever end game god has planned for us. But if I wanted a soul to experience everyrhing life can give them in a 100 year span I am making a multiverse and that soul gets divided everytime it branches with choices and decisions. Originating with one soul and returning in one soul. So if you died in another multiverse that soul just empties into the pool until everything returns but instead of water you have wine 😏
@@laithamekir5778 That doesn't help me. Even if a God existed (and I'm pretty sure it doesn't) the "soul pool" would still be nonsensical. We can theorize about a multiverse at length but in the end it is how it's used in film that is relevant to my statement and in MCU's multiverse it appears very loosely defined so the writers can do whatever they want. That type of a multiverse makes they storytelling less compelling to me.