Scientists Now Believe a Star May Have Come Closer to Earth than the Voyager 1 Spacecraft

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 сен 2024
  • Join Territory to get access to perks:
    / @territoryspace
    A fascinating new study suggests that a close encounter with a wayward star might explain the unusual orbits of certain objects at the edge of our Solar System. The star, which came within 110 astronomical units (AU) of the Sun, may have disrupted the orbits of small celestial bodies and even some of our planetary moons. To put that into context, that's closer to us than Voyager 1, which is 164 AU from Earth.
    Researchers used over 3,000 computer simulations to test this stellar flyby theory. Their results support the idea that the star's gravity could explain the tilted, eccentric orbits of trans-Neptunian objects, including the distant dwarf planet Sedna, which is 937 AU from the Sun. Even more intriguingly, this stellar encounter may have caused some of the irregular moons of Saturn, Jupiter, and Neptune to be captured into their current orbits.
    The findings shed new light on our Solar System's history, offering a potential explanation for both the odd behavior of distant objects and the existence of retrograde moons. If confirmed, this event could mark a dramatic yet previously overlooked chapter in the evolution of our cosmic neighborhood.
    Subscribe to take a deep dive into the unknown with Territory - / @territoryspace
    Instagram - territoryspace

Комментарии • 102

  • @Flyingdutchy33
    @Flyingdutchy33 2 дня назад +17

    It wasn't that long ago that one was presumed to have a tin foil hat when talking about planet 9...
    _"Scientists warn that we will run out of conspiracies in 6 months at the rate at which they are coming true"_

  • @kevinp3550
    @kevinp3550 3 дня назад +32

    Hey! Voyager I was launched in 1977 NOT 1971!

    • @DavidHaft1970
      @DavidHaft1970 2 дня назад +2

      Pioneer 10 was launched in 1971 I think.

    • @HalloranIllustrations
      @HalloranIllustrations День назад +2

      @@DavidHaft1970 Close 1972

    • @boa1793
      @boa1793 День назад +1

      Kevin, Is that Voyager 1 was launched or YOU were launched? Funny typos, I think.

    • @RobertSilliams
      @RobertSilliams 21 час назад +1

      @@boa1793I is one in roman numerals

    • @jeffdavis5723
      @jeffdavis5723 15 часов назад +1

      *STILL CLICKBAIT‼️* 🤷🏼‍♂️ ⚡️

  • @JackFrost008
    @JackFrost008 2 дня назад +11

    we would be able to see another star if any was that close.

    • @Xianngg
      @Xianngg День назад +1

      That happened billions of year ago bud, that star must be either gone or too far away

    • @johnvasquez4442
      @johnvasquez4442 День назад +1

      A brown dwarf doesn't emit much light. Hard to find.

    • @JackFrost008
      @JackFrost008 День назад

      @@johnvasquez4442 yea but we would see it cos it would be so close and we would be affected by the gravitational pull.

    • @JackFrost008
      @JackFrost008 День назад

      @@johnvasquez4442 atleast its not brown rain.

  • @ccc822007
    @ccc822007 3 дня назад +32

    Most star systems are binary. Might be our binary companion.

    • @popacristian2056
      @popacristian2056 2 дня назад +5

      No.

    • @Xianngg
      @Xianngg 2 дня назад +7

      Yeah no thanks, earth being tidal locked or having a messed up orbit isn't good for us

    • @SkellyDrAgOn
      @SkellyDrAgOn 2 дня назад +4

      Nemesis

    • @QSwishGD
      @QSwishGD День назад +1

      Nope.

    • @r3yd164
      @r3yd164 8 часов назад

      ​@@popacristian2056yes

  • @bryansawyer5229
    @bryansawyer5229 3 дня назад +10

    Planet 9. Planet X was predicted in the 1800's and they still believe it exists because of the tilt of trans-neptunian satellites/brown dwarfs.

  • @participantparticipant506
    @participantparticipant506 День назад +6

    Wouldn't a passing star have it's own collection of planets? Not to mention comets, asteroids and other objects.

  • @jackreisewitz6632
    @jackreisewitz6632 2 дня назад +5

    So since the estimation of exactly when a star may have come close enough to tilt planetary orbits is a best guess, wouldn't it make sense to wonder if that is what caused the Late Heavy Bombardment?

  • @marsrocket
    @marsrocket 2 часа назад +4

    A star comes within 500 AU every few hundred thousand years, but within 1500 AU every billion years? And no, none of the distances you mention are anywhere near Voyager 1 or 2, which are only about 160 AU from earth. This video is nonsense.

  • @Galacticnoob69
    @Galacticnoob69 2 дня назад +8

    3:19 how did bro mess up almost EVERY order of planets😭

    • @grimchameleon0546
      @grimchameleon0546 2 дня назад

      wtf is blud talking about🙏💀

    • @xtremefps_
      @xtremefps_ День назад

      ​@@grimchameleon0546 idk what this noob yapping about. OP only accidentally switched up saturn and jupiter in the video. In the following showing of the planets he shows it in the correct order so clearly just a minor slip up.

  • @mikedearing6352
    @mikedearing6352 2 дня назад +4

    Imagine the torque on our magnetic north pole, it's Moving kinda fast already, like it's attracted to something. Pole flip maybe ??

    • @WonneKroesPiano
      @WonneKroesPiano 5 часов назад +1

      I've been wondering about this too...

  • @toddkurzbard
    @toddkurzbard 14 часов назад +6

    As far as "Planet 9" goes, we've known about it for nearly a century.
    Its' name is, "Pluto".

    • @Svensk7119
      @Svensk7119 10 часов назад +1

      Agreed, Brother!

    • @sublimehypocrisy
      @sublimehypocrisy Час назад

      Pretty silly to consider it a planet when we have other bodies larger than Pluto which are not considered planets.

    • @fredwmanzo8580
      @fredwmanzo8580 Час назад

      @@sublimehypocrisy so call them
      Planets. The official definition of planets never made much sense to me. Among other things, according to the definition a planet must clear its orbit and must revolve around a star. So are “rogue planets” not planets? A sort of non-planet planet? And has Neptune cleared its orbit or Jupiter or Earth, for that matter?

    • @Svensk7119
      @Svensk7119 47 минут назад

      @sublimehypocrisy Perhaps, if scientists actually "demoted" it honestly.
      Personally, I think they deliberately picked a definition just to exclude Pluto, and waited until the end of that conference deliberately, so that only five percent of that body's membership would be there.
      And why does a star-scientist organization have the right to judge planets?

  • @megret1808
    @megret1808 3 дня назад +8

    72K yo, the human race nearly went extinct. Coincidence?

  • @michaelmallal9101
    @michaelmallal9101 3 дня назад +5

    Maybe this is what Velikovsky was describing in his book 'Ages in Chaos'? Also tilts in Earth's and Uranus's axis?

  • @jcj3374
    @jcj3374 2 дня назад +3

    Scholz's star
    70000 years ago a binary system a red dwarf and a brown dwarf. And it passed through the Oort cloud

  • @fredwmanzo8580
    @fredwmanzo8580 19 часов назад +1

    You seems to have mixed up your distances as 500 is less than 1500 AUs. If a star comes as near as 500 AUs once every few hundred thousand years it can’t be “even rarer” to come within 1500 AUs.

  • @omegafalconoriginal
    @omegafalconoriginal 2 дня назад +1

    So uranus and neptune were planets circling another star that our sun stole and the reason why they're magnetic poles are tilted different as their poles are still aligned as if they were still in orbit of their original star?

  • @David-jl1pk
    @David-jl1pk День назад +1

    Could the newly discovered Kuiper Belt objects be the start of the inner Oort Cloud or is that still too close?

  • @williammay5300
    @williammay5300 День назад +1

    Pluto is planet 9!!! The mystery planet is number 10

  • @psychiatry-is-eugenics
    @psychiatry-is-eugenics 3 дня назад +2

    Adrenaline can be addictive ?
    Wonder if skydiving would help with depression ?

    • @seanhewitt603
      @seanhewitt603 2 дня назад

      It's a practice run for a jumper... You want to encourage wrong minded actions?

  • @JohnKuhles1966
    @JohnKuhles1966 5 часов назад

    "Scientists Now Believe" ... who? ... NO SOURCES GIVEN! ... "new research suggest" Who? NO SOURCES GIVEN!

  • @ncdave4life
    @ncdave4life День назад

    The artwork with this video, showing space teeming with rocks, is highly misleading.

  • @michaelanderson3096
    @michaelanderson3096 День назад

    Maybe some trans Neptunian objects came from close encounter from other stars ??? Sedna ??? Or interstellar objects captured by Earth's star's gravity ???

  • @Svensk7119
    @Svensk7119 9 часов назад

    I would say "red dwarves".
    Perhaps, I am over-Tolkiened... nah, not possible.

  • @katesisco
    @katesisco 17 часов назад

    There is always a new name but the results are the same: a close call that produced disturbances and cosmic close-calls and even meteorite showers.
    The Gaminga nova is the most recent event per Firestone, et al.
    While proposing contacts, we should begin not with the Kuiper belt but the Oort shell which appears from outside to a PLANETARY NOVA.

  • @bigdave6390
    @bigdave6390 19 часов назад

    Seems like scientists will believe just about anything. Throughout history.

  • @karpabla
    @karpabla День назад

    "Scientists now believe" is e coming the prelude to some random findings that, probably, will be negated short time after. 😉🙂
    Anyway, those things are pretty interesting, be it speculation or not. Thanks!

  • @JohnLinares-g7v
    @JohnLinares-g7v 4 часа назад

    A passing near miss with another solar system would be ideal for transpermia

  • @johnishikawa2200
    @johnishikawa2200 22 часа назад

    This massive planet nine, if it exists, would it be a rocky planet, or a gas or ice giant, do they know?

  • @wheeljork
    @wheeljork 2 дня назад

    I am guessing you are not aware that the 'recent encounter' and 'planet 9' are mutually exclusive hypotheses.

  • @stringedassassin
    @stringedassassin День назад

    No f'n way a star coming that close wasn't in the gravitational influence of the sun. No way.

  • @TheZachatree
    @TheZachatree 3 часа назад

    Planet X. Not a star. If it was a star and was that close, we would all have saw it.

  • @mikehartman5326
    @mikehartman5326 2 дня назад

    I think that some of the irregular moons are from the other stars Oort cloud. It would be interesting to have them visited and found out their age.

  • @billyhomeyer7414
    @billyhomeyer7414 День назад +8

    Computer models are for the most part, usually not accurate. Just look at the hilarious climate models that concluded Earth would be uninhabitable by 1990, 2000, 2010, 2020 and now 2030 (AOC said so and she’s smart)

    • @gcallananpainting
      @gcallananpainting 16 часов назад

      Exactly, they're never accurate because they don't have all the data.

  • @popacristian2056
    @popacristian2056 2 дня назад

    One of these retrograde satellites should be the target of future probes to collect samples for analysis. 5:14

  • @greglusienski8550
    @greglusienski8550 2 дня назад

    Not possible the sun gravity would have slung all the planets into outer orbits or into each other.

  • @RandyMachoSavage
    @RandyMachoSavage 12 часов назад

    Ever heard of nemesis? Our suns counterpart.

  • @dreameonify-sucksatlife-on8438
    @dreameonify-sucksatlife-on8438 2 дня назад

    This could finally disprove Planet 9

  • @NV..V
    @NV..V День назад

    Our star identifies as non-binary...

  • @waz2day
    @waz2day День назад

    Uranus is upside down………

  • @kennethquinnies6023
    @kennethquinnies6023 Час назад

    I call this BS.

  • @StryKhymorodnyk
    @StryKhymorodnyk 2 дня назад +2

    Two merging stones in space don't prove the way plantets were built. It is more like static electricity induced from the Sun's activity and gravity together. Perhaps, there are more complex things working together with these.

  • @kristjiannne
    @kristjiannne 2 дня назад

    What was that- Nibiru?!

  • @kennethesposito5279
    @kennethesposito5279 День назад

    It's possible.

  • @maz3563
    @maz3563 2 дня назад +3

    Since NO ONE has ever traveled “out there” to VERIFY, in real time, all of these distances, interactions, and calculations, I consider all this information, at best, educated theories on the best available information, and at worst, conjectures based upon again, best information and the knowledge and expertise of the theoretical physicists.
    I don’t see how anyone can take these explanations as gospel truth.

    • @pikachu6031
      @pikachu6031 2 дня назад +1

      Simple…..Because the speed of light is constant, and using Einstein’s E=MC2, and observations of position changes in objects over a certain period of time….It is quite easy to calculate these things….By the use of trigonometry, Calculus, Blue and Red Shift in light from distant objects, it isn’t really that difficult to work out very accurately, size, distance and orbits of objects!…..Using the light spectrum, it’s also not difficult to work out atmospheric compositions of distant Planets as well!….So, yes it is very possible to work out most of what you seem to think isn’t possible, simply because we haven’t physically been there…..A ridiculous statement in itself!

    • @maz3563
      @maz3563 2 дня назад

      @@pikachu6031
      So,

    • @pikachu6031
      @pikachu6031 День назад

      The speed of light is quite easy to calculate actually….If you understand anything about Physics and Mathematics, which you obviously don’t…..And, I suppose you’re one of those fools who believe the Moon Landings were faked, or that the Mars missions are all NASA lies and propaganda!….You’re nothing but a denier of provable scientific Facts, and deniers are nothing but idiots who don’t understand anything……Because they don’t understand it, they deny it or refuse to believe it, just like you!!!

  • @johnmcque4813
    @johnmcque4813 3 дня назад +5

    Having a planet moving the opposite direction than the sun rotates, iss highly unlikely, The sun's gravity would slow it down, and force it to rotate with the spin of the sun I believe..

    • @parkerottoackley6325
      @parkerottoackley6325 3 дня назад +8

      Wrong

    • @bosco_georjo9842
      @bosco_georjo9842 3 дня назад +1

      ​@@parkerottoackley6325Please explain

    • @popacristian2056
      @popacristian2056 2 дня назад +1

      Not at all.

    • @JackFrost008
      @JackFrost008 2 дня назад

      I don't think so but have we ever found any planet orbiting the other way round a star? they all go the same way here

    • @OOOOOOOOOF
      @OOOOOOOOOF 2 дня назад

      Did you even graduate university 😏

  • @SkellyDrAgOn
    @SkellyDrAgOn 2 дня назад +1

    More and more I'm starting to think the Sumerians were right about the Annunaki, the planet Nibiru and our binary star Nemesis.

  • @DavidGreen-n1s
    @DavidGreen-n1s День назад

    SCIENTISTS can 'believe' whatever they want.
    The REST of "US" just wonder "WHEN" our iwn government decided to "HIDE" shit from the PEOPLE who made the 'Government' POSSIBLE in the first place😂

  • @chucksucks8640
    @chucksucks8640 3 дня назад +7

    I think this is clickbait

    • @seanhewitt603
      @seanhewitt603 2 дня назад +2

      I think you're a bot...

    • @steelcelt5939
      @steelcelt5939 2 дня назад +2

      Might it be that a rogue star has disrupted Uranus?

    • @pikachu6031
      @pikachu6031 2 дня назад

      I think you’re another one with this “click bait” nonsense on the Brain!

    • @ronaldchives2486
      @ronaldchives2486 День назад

      @@steelcelt5939 I thought it was a mild touch of diarrhoea🙂

    • @jeffdavis5723
      @jeffdavis5723 15 часов назад

      *Definitely CLICKBAIT‼️* 🤷🏼‍♂️ ⚡️