Love this new series Marc. I was wondering if you could give some of us who have never been to tournament a lesson on what people are writing down after each game. Thanks 😊
Dear Mark Olsen, I truly appreciate your videos about backgammon and I am really glad to watch them, because, even though I am a simple amateur, I manage to learn every time from you. However Backgammon Galaxy is a real desaster regarding dices. The program is made to favorite the old customers by "playing stupid jokes" to the new ones, such as myself, using the "luck" of the dices. And I mean it. Two times out of two in two different games. The ONLY ONE combination that fits to the opponent to turn the entire events. Whatever... I've learned my lesson by not playing games in virtual even though I stay a low rated player. I just had enough of that type of virtual "luck". Best luck to you. And stay safe.
It's quite common for less experienced players to believe that the dice are rigged. We get this a lot actually. And we keep saying the same thing: The dice are not rigged. We gain absolutely nothing from this. Quite the contrary actually. So it makes no sense to have rigged dice.
Kay im quite good at chess time to get good at... this i watched your tutorial video and i have no idea what is a good move as long as i dont leave a one i feel its good but... yeah im need to learn
Hi Mark thanks for your great videos as you told in this video in DMP when we are in doubt we have to play the move that loses more gammon, ok so in the latest position we have to play 5*4 and 12 to 7 what do u think?
Agree on the concept and very interesting , but on the third problem playing 8 to 3 isn't better in case black rolls 16 or 25 from the bar+ more covering numbers for the blot?
@@jjoker2775 thanks, I knew it could not have been the correct play, you can make the 2 or 1 pt when they dance or more return shots when they jump out
in the second setup (at around 5 minutes, ruclips.net/video/emo_RtpZGO0/видео.html) the best move is 8/3 5/4* - not as pointed out 13/8 5/4* (which is actually a blunder >-0.147) - hitting is good but you don't want to stack you 8-point to 5 and rather want to say flexible for (a) closing the board later (b) having more return shots for black rolling 2+5 or 1+6. Even 12/7 5/4* is better than 13/8 5/4* but it leaves to many shorts for black on entering (+4 shots=18).
Thank you for this video but the ideal move you present is ... a *big blunder* (-0.128 according to xg). You're right about the 5/4 ! => Good, it's the point of the video :) But you forgot to apply your reasoning to the other checker ... 13/8 is wrong. You want to cover the field in case the opponent rolls 6/1 or 5/2 and play bar/7 (4/36=11% probability). By playing *8/3, you keep the checker way back on the 13 and have way more shoots in case your opponent plays bar/7* (33 against 22). With no negative effect as you don't care leaving blots (no gammon...). Perfect example :)
It’s called double match point because both players are a single point away from winning the match. If the score was say 4 to 3 in a game to 5, it would be considered “match point” and not “double match point” because only one of the players is a single point away from winning the match
In the position, where your opponent has a closed board, you rolled 51 and hit in DMP with the 1 on the 4-point, you lose more gammons if you leave a checker on 13, and play 8/3 with the 5. Guess what: it is the better play. Thanks for the video anyway.
I realize I don’t understand the terminology completely. I know a gammon is when you bear all your checkers off before your opponent gets one off, and a backgammon is the same only your opponent still has a checker in your back board. What is meant by “loose more gammons” in reference to one move. Are you just referencing the odds of winning a gammon or is there some other terminology at play here?
I greatly appreciate your videos, and throughly enjoyed From Basic to Badass. I just bought Pure Strategy. Please keep the content coming.
"Backgammon nerds" xD xD xD - absolutely creasing hahahah
As usual. Great insight - adjusting play based on the stakes.
wonderful vid , fall more in love with that board everytime i see it
you can get it for the XG computer software if you contact Rain in his channel
"and actually 14 is less than 20"
Your backgammon genius never ceases to amaze me!
That was an interesting watch
Thx!!
Amazing content
Love this new series Marc. I was wondering if you could give some of us who have never been to tournament a lesson on what people are writing down after each game. Thanks 😊
The score.
Top content. 👍📚📈
Thx!!
👍🏻 This was not what I expected, learned a lot of key concepts here.
Dear Mark Olsen,
I truly appreciate your videos about backgammon and I am really glad to watch them, because, even though I am a simple amateur, I manage to learn every time from you.
However Backgammon Galaxy is a real desaster regarding dices. The program is made to favorite the old customers by "playing stupid jokes" to the new ones, such as myself, using the "luck" of the dices. And I mean it. Two times out of two in two different games. The ONLY ONE combination that fits to the opponent to turn the entire events.
Whatever... I've learned my lesson by not playing games in virtual even though I stay a low rated player. I just had enough of that type of virtual "luck".
Best luck to you. And stay safe.
It's quite common for less experienced players to believe that the dice are rigged. We get this a lot actually. And we keep saying the same thing: The dice are not rigged. We gain absolutely nothing from this. Quite the contrary actually. So it makes no sense to have rigged dice.
Dear @hristog82 I truly appreciate your hilarious post about the dice being rigged.Thx for the lolz bro!!!🤣🤣🤣
Thanks for another great video! BTW Marc, you keep calling the anchor anger, that's so Viking of you...
haha :-D
Great instruction thank you! 🎲🎲
Excellent video.
Great video Marc!
Glad you enjoyed it
Great content Marc!
Appreciate it!
great stuff Marc. Keep 'em coming. Enjoy all you do for us.
Nice broom
😂
great video, thanks! would you consider doing a video where you play multiple 1-point matches and commentate?
👍💪🎲🎲Great!
why not play the 5 : 8-3 ?
Yes, more return shots when they jump out, I asked this same question
the insight is great. The camera gives you a headache. Just concentrate on the board.
Kay im quite good at chess time to get good at... this i watched your tutorial video and i have no idea what is a good move as long as i dont leave a one i feel its good but... yeah im need to learn
Hi Mark
thanks for your great videos
as you told in this video in DMP when we are in doubt we have to play the move that loses more gammon, ok
so in the latest position we have to play
5*4
and 12 to 7
what do u think?
Great content, stop your Hollywood camera man zooming in and out!
Does this kind of play also apply if you are in the Crawford game?
Good info but ruined by that goofy camera moving all over, zooming in and out. O got a headache watching
Agree on the concept and very interesting , but on the third problem playing 8 to 3 isn't better in case black rolls 16 or 25 from the bar+ more covering numbers for the blot?
8/3 is better. Playing 13/8 is even worse than not hitting and making the bar point. (-0.129 vs. -0.064).
@@jjoker2775 thanks, I knew it could not have been the correct play, you can make the 2 or 1 pt when they dance or more return shots when they jump out
What is a double match point?
in the second setup (at around 5 minutes, ruclips.net/video/emo_RtpZGO0/видео.html) the best move is 8/3 5/4* - not as pointed out 13/8 5/4* (which is actually a blunder >-0.147) - hitting is good but you don't want to stack you 8-point to 5 and rather want to say flexible for (a) closing the board later (b) having more return shots for black rolling 2+5 or 1+6. Even 12/7 5/4* is better than 13/8 5/4* but it leaves to many shorts for black on entering (+4 shots=18).
On your last example why not hit and play 8/3 in case they jump out to the outfield?
Thank you for this video but the ideal move you present is ... a *big blunder* (-0.128 according to xg).
You're right about the 5/4 ! => Good, it's the point of the video :) But you forgot to apply your reasoning to the other checker ...
13/8 is wrong. You want to cover the field in case the opponent rolls 6/1 or 5/2 and play bar/7 (4/36=11% probability).
By playing *8/3, you keep the checker way back on the 13 and have way more shoots in case your opponent plays bar/7* (33 against 22).
With no negative effect as you don't care leaving blots (no gammon...).
Perfect example :)
What board is this??
Why are they called "double" match games if they're only single games? Thank you very much.
It’s called double match point because both players are a single point away from winning the match.
If the score was say 4 to 3 in a game to 5, it would be considered “match point” and not “double match point” because only one of the players is a single point away from winning the match
Good commentary. May I suggest that your videographer stand still? I almost got seasick with the constant movement. It’s very distracting.
Noted!
In the position, where your opponent has a closed board, you rolled 51 and hit in DMP with the 1 on the 4-point, you lose more gammons if you leave a checker on 13, and play 8/3 with the 5. Guess what: it is the better play. Thanks for the video anyway.
I realize I don’t understand the terminology completely. I know a gammon is when you bear all your checkers off before your opponent gets one off, and a backgammon is the same only your opponent still has a checker in your back board. What is meant by “loose more gammons” in reference to one move. Are you just referencing the odds of winning a gammon or is there some other terminology at play here?
I beleive its said by Stick
Nerd