IT CAN PLAY ACTUAL GAMES?!?!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 сен 2024
- The integrated GPU on Intel's new Kaby Lake processors has big shoes to fill with the HD 530 performing fairly well. The HD 630 therefore was put through the test of playing Grand Theft Auto: V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, DOOM, The Witcher 3, League of Legends, Overwatch, and of course, Crysis. How does this bundle graphics card fair against actual games?
If you're in South Africa, check out Wootware for your next CPU purchase: goo.gl/8d0Pf4
Also, check out ASUS South Africa: www.asus.com/za/
To use my US Amazon affiliate link: amzn.to/2i64Md8
For the intro/outro music by Kalyptra: goo.gl/eVmyNVd
Join the UFDisciple Discord server! - / discord
My Twitter - / ufdisciple
My Facebook - / ufdisciple
My Instagram - / ufdisciple
lol he said "...even RX 460 will help..."
RX 460 is the new 'even'
Jarod Roach xD
the RX460 isn't bad at all. It can easily beat the 750Ti and it has a respectable overclocking performance and can be unlocked from 896 SC to 1024 SC, which overclocked give you up to 25% more performance. With my XFX RX460 4GB Dual Fan i was able to get over the level of a GTX960!
Yeah that's what made me laugh XD
I am considering replacing my old 7770 in my backup PC with a RX 460 to overclock
Go for it. I mean, if you prefer the red team and don't mind losing out on 1-3 fps in most situations over the 1050, I'd say it's a good option. Be sure to watch for the 4GB version, since the 2GB version just isn't worth it.
welll, if you take on hand that the 480, no 460, is competing with the 1060, not 1080, now you have an idea..
I feel like changing to 1366x768 would be a good compromise for some of those newer games.
+Sir_Sethery Fair enough. Would definitely give you better frames, as I mentioned in the video.
I played Borderlands 2 and Skyrim on a laptop with a 330M at 768p (1080p screen). Dunno the framerates but it was fun.
+Glenn Mitchell Anything is playable if you have no alternative.
Glenn Mitchell I played skyrim 720p intel hd 4000
Does playing in windowed mode increase FPS at all?
today's igpu's are as good as highend gpu's were a decade ago, which is understandable considering how liitle space they are packing into one die. maybe in the next 10 years igpu's will be able to play games like doom on ultra settings at 1080p at 60fps.
SteelCity1981 4k 60fps not 1080p
+jordocondi #rekt #consolemasterrace #vivalaresistance!
Except it's a dGPU...
if you think current integrated CPU are for gaming at 720p , they are totally ok. the GPU on my pentium G3260 can play Tomb Raider at 40fps at 720p... 720p isnt too bad, it's like gaming on PS3 !
imkow lol
Yeah and everyone buys a pc to game at ps3 level fps and graphics xD
*remember when intel said you don't need a discrete gpu for gaming*
Ignitablegamer they said that
*yes they did*
Technically, you don't. Gaming is kind of a broad term... you probably don't need a discrete GPU to play 2D games. I know plenty of people that get motion sickness from looking at fast-paced 3D anyway, and end up being limited to 2D gaming. And presumably, even some 3D titles work. I don't know why it is that when people talking about gaming on the PC, they assume you want to run really demanding games at high settings. If people can have fun on something as primitive as the NES or a DOS-era computer, why not the HD 630? I mean, sure it might not run a demanding 3D game like Far Cry or something, but then you don't have to play Far Cry to have fun with games on your PC, now do you?
they actually made a statement about a year or two ago...
+AdamantiteSpectre Ummmm no
Should be pretty good for 1366x768 laptops, right?
Considering that it's about 50% of the FullHD resolution, it should get some respectable framerates on games that got about 25-30 FPS.
i would recommend setting it at 1360 x 768 because those six rows of 6 pixels for some reason cost a lot of performance
Because it's not 6 extra pixels, it's 4608 extra pixels.
***** i know dude i meant six rows of pixels should i edit it for you?
+Pelle Sanders pls
Have you ever had to play games at a whopping 800x600 resolution in order to actually get playable FPS?
CaesarGamer i have...
Yes and I only got 20fps in league of legends :C
CaesarGamer I had a laptop with an AMD CPU with igpu.I really wanted to play witcher 2,okay?
I remember those days. I don't miss them.
CaesarGamer played and finished tomb raider(2013) on very low settings with 800*600 ....:( ...
I still game with HD 4400 :D on the go because its best I got.
An RX 460 is 100$-ish. Or a GTX 750 ti, if you want to save even more. Literally. Please. Buy a gpu. They're cheap as fuck.
He mean't in a laptop, hence, "on the go".
LaBomba Romba Meant*
I didn't really understand that. Weird to start a phrase with "On the go because".
If he meant to refer to a laptop, then he should've said something like "I'm on the go so it's the best I got". Not because. You can't be "on the go because its the best you got". That would imply that if you had worse, you wouldn't be on the go.
Anyway, my little rant about grammatical mistakes is over. lol
ManisCo OOOHHH... Now I see what you mean... I honestly didn't realise that the first time I read it...
Ayy I feel you bro, my Laptop has HD 4400 Graphics too!
The IGPU inside my i7 6700k is just sitting there not being used and taking up precious die space. My 980ti does all the worrk. This was the last time I've bought a CPU with an igpu. Should have gone with an X99 system and a hexa core.
Rem ko No, just no. it's normal that it doesnt do anything
Rem ko Big no. if you use the x99 processor you will only get less fps with much higher price and you can only get the benefit if you play cpu intensive game like cities skylines
Sion Theodorus who says all he does is use games?
Sion Theodorus
It's better to have an additional 2 cores in reserve than have the space occupied by the unnecessary iGPU.
A 5820K costs as much as a 7700K. I'm glad I went X99.
Krytern UK
The difference in gaming is negligible at best. It's the GPU that matters most and as long as that isn't bottlenecked you won't see any improvement after a certain point. As long as you're playing at a sensible resolution anyway.
I'd rather have a 6 core 12 thread 4.5GHz CPU rather than a 4 core 8 thread 5GHz cpu with a useless iGPU taking up valuable die space.
But hey if you want to pay for features you won't use its entirely up to you.
run the games at 1024x768 then everything is fine
Fair enough. Not sure I could appreciate that.
it will be just like playing old school gamecube on an old standard def crt. We put up with that back in the day lol. I could put up with that for a few months until money came around to get a gpu. I did that with my last build
Bad ideas that can be tolerated are not the same as good ideas. :D
You need to stretch it though, then it looks almost like 720p.
Intel HD 4400 on CS:GO is hurting on 768p resolution (like nuke lol) 1280x720 is fine on that game though
subscribed to you when you only had 100 followers.. and i told you your gonna go places.. glad to see this happening! but dude.. lose the scruff.. it doesnt fit you.. just my opinion.. but also keep up the great work!
+UFDisciple You're aware that it's only until I hit 10K subs and not a style choice, right?
+Geekazoid Network Thanks for the feedback. I don't personally have an issue with people disliking my facial hair. If they want to watch my videos, they will. If they leave because of my looks, well then I'm not sure I want them in the first place. The best option is everyone hates my facial hair and wants me to hit 10K to get rid of it, that's basically my motivation.
Just visited this channel for the first time and I immediately thought the same thing. He looks like Shaggy from Scooby Doo.
+Rem ko That I'm going to go places or my scruff is bad?
It's not free you pay for that die space used.
The CPU die is the actual CPU, and die space is the area of the die used for a certain propose. The bigger the die the more expensive it is as for every square millimetre you add you increase the chance of the CPU turning out bad exponentially and having to throw it away and increasing the cost of the good CPU's for the end consumer or the CPU manufacturer has to take a smaller profit.
That goldish glassy thing in the middle is the CPU die
images.bit-tech.net/content_images/2013/06/ek-supremacy-precisemount-review/ek-delid-kit-15-1280x1024.jpg
It's actually upside down all the components are actually on the other side so they can connect up to substrate and be connected upto the motherboard when the CPU is in the socket.
The other side of the CPU die will looks something like
infomars.fr/kyro/die//Niagara%20II%20%20(Ultrasparc%20T2).jpg
Also here is a labelled diagram
www.hardwarebbq.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/intel-cpu-substrate.png
The *TIM* is the *Thermal Interface Material* the IHS is the Integrated heat spreader, tbh though it was not really implemented to spread the heat as much as to stop people crushing dies as a heat spreader actually inhibits cooling, kind of an oxymoron really, but if they called it the IPS for Idiot Proof Shield I think some people might take offence and remove it.
So as I was saying the exponentul increase in cost for every millimetre added is part of the reason that Intels 24 core CPU's cost $4000 also it's because they know they can charge enterprise companies that kind of money realistically they could sell those for $2500 - $3000 and still make a killing but still it is true that it cost more to make 24 core CPU than making 6 x 4 core CPU's by a large margin.
100% resolution scale at 1080p on Doom? that killed the poor little iGPU, should've done 720p with a lower resolution scale and the average would have been about 28 to 30fps, playable if you've been through the pain of playing on iGPU's before....
Thanks for the feedback.
still having the pain of an almighty intel hd graphics 4400!
ran ark survival at 25 fps cant complain although it looked like clay
Drop it down to 720p, you will achieve 40+ FPS Godhood.
For those actually interested in using integrated graphics temporarily dropping that res to 1600x900 and you'll see a quite significant difference. 1080p is a *44% jump* in pixels over 900p which provides a similar fps dip of around ~35-40%. Meaning that games like Crysis that are getting ~20fps average would actually get around ~28fps average at 900p with the same settings in Crysis 3. (And for the record, if you plan to use integrated longer than a few weeks i'd definitely recommend getting a chip like the broadwell i5 5675C or one of the few Skylake chips which have both the Intel Iris Pro graphics (The "Intel NUC" you can buy online that has a mini case and cpu and motherboard built-in for a great portable gaming PC, has the Intel Iris Pro 580 graphics which is easily TWICE the power of the HD 630 on the 7700K) and all these CPUs with Iris Pro also have a built-in eDRAM (usually either 128MB or 256MB) which acts as extra VRAM for the integrated GPU but since it's directly on the chip it becomes SUPER fast compared to your normal system ram (yes, integrated graphics actually uses your SYSTEM RAM for the GPU. iGPU's don't have RAM usually) and makes games a fair bit faster and more reliable in general. Plus if you get a regular GPU later like an RX 460 or GTX 1050 TI or whatever etc.. then that 256MB of eDRAM will actually function as an L4 cache (make sure to turn off the iGPU in options and activate the new GPU. Otherwise your fps will still be shit lol) and in general seems to give up to 5% increase in framerate in many games. In fact you can STILL see Broadwell chips like the i7 5775C (that only runs at like 3.7ghz) still tying with the i7 7700K that runs at 4.5ghz in many games!
TheScaleless if only if such a thing existed in a "T" SKU... :D
I been promoting games on igpu for about two years! Iris540 is very impressive!! Awesome channel man!
lets see intel and AMD are teaming up with next gen intels processors will have amd igpus in them. its gonna be interesting.
I think Intel just needed to buy licenses for GPU technology that both AMD and Nvidia have or something, pretty sure Intel won't have anything like radeon GPUs integrated into their CPUs.
mistermaximal only time will tell :D but if its really radeon gpus inside intels next gen CPU it will be exciting.
I haven't heard anything about this :o can you share a link or something?
Raindrop511 www.forbes.com/sites/tiriasresearch/2016/12/06/is-amd-licensing-radeon-graphics-to-intel/#4a582bd87719
Afaik it's not even sure this will happen. And if it happens I'm still pretty sure that it's just for some technology licensing, and not actual Radeon GPUs in Intel chips.
I believe intel wants to push forward their iGPU's but they can't find the way to do it, maybe they want to implement the same architecture inside AMD APU's to make them better, these are certainly good news for AMD.
2:54 what kind of software let's you record video using "interlaced" frames? that's an ancient old technology, suited for crt tv's
Intel's HD graphics architecture was licenced from Nvidia. Essentially meaning the On-board igpu is running slightly modified Nvidia architecture. AND the HD 630 graphics have 48 graphics cores at around a 1.1GHz max boost, meaning the performance will be very similar to slightly better than a GT 610 at best, which also runs 48 graphics cores at around a slightly slower speed. Only difference being the increased cast latency on the memory due to it not being on board.
Hi, one thing i did to my 4790k to improve substancialy the performance of its igpu hd4600 was to downclock the processor clock since it does not make a real difference because it feeds much faster the gpu than it can take advantage of, and overclocked my igpu to 1.7 ghz. Another thing is in my case DDR3, i've added a 2400 mhz CL10 memory, i gained in most games like Crysis(the first one) almost 10 fps on average.
I would really like to see this hd 630 on better conditions, which means a much better ddr4 4000 or higher with low CL lowered cpu clocks speeds watercooled and overclocked.
Thanks!
came across your video just randomly in my recommended videos, Enjoyed it alot :)
+Zave Nice! Glad to have you as a viewer! Thanks for taking a chance on me!
You are one of the few who talked about integrated graphics and mentioned dual channel memory in it, props for that.
Just beware that lower end HD graphics with less shaders (eg: HD2500, HD4000)won't benefit from dual channel as even on slow memory as the card can't process data fast enough to require more bandwidth.
WHAT?The i630 have 8gb video memory on gta v?It says 8118mb...
Based on your system memory, not that the HD 630 had 8GB of dedicated VRAM.
i have an rx 460 and it runs the witcher 3 no problem
Thank you for proving my point! :D
yeah just letting people know :)
Dude in Witcher 3 you forgot to go into the performance department and turn stuff there off
pardon me, it's called "Post-Processing" not Performance. I can also see in your video a lot of blur, motion blur and anti-aliasing, and I believe that's the reason why your iGPU's decimated. Shader-intensive stuff molests iGPUs
I used to play with my hd 530 back in the summer cause i was waiting for gtc 1060 to come out , and i have to tell that i happen to run games far better in 720p than 1080p, for example 40 fps in gta v it was really playable
gtx 1060*
+Gasoline Stoner Of course it'll run better in 720P. But I'd rather test it at what resolution most gamers typically play at (according to Steam survey) to demonstrate its capabilities. Obviously if you want to firm up those numbers, you can drop the resolution.
Ah i see. but still. if using Integrated graphics like Intel HD, never try to have the resolution set to community standards. for low profile GPU's or Intel HD or AMD APU's. I never go higher than 720p. I like to make the game as playable as possible.
So I'm not supposed to test something that the community is typically using? I'm supposed to use something else? Until the community that uses the thing I leave out disagrees with that choice. 1080P covers 720p since you can assume better performance at the lower resolution, but you can't guess how much worse 1080p would be if I only tested 720p.
Yay finally i can play League on 60fps.
Aside from the disappointment of Kaby Lake, that's actually seriously impressive. If you went down to 720p you could probably play quite a few rather well.
yeah I play in 720p to stay in the high 30s FPS instead of 1080 and low 30s/20s FPS
ObiWanKeighobi shut up 8th gen is quad core
The best igpu by intel is the iris pro series, not intel hd series, incase anyone was wondering. The best iris pro is roughly between the performance of 7th and 8th gen consoles. I'm rockin' hd 4000 on my Dell Latitude e6230 (it has the i5-3320m)and at 900p (external display) it runs almost all 7th gen games at almost console settings (with some exceptions being higher, actually).
Plus, that's with 2x4gb ram at 1600mhz.
Overall, I have to say the biggest perk of apus and igpus is cheap mobile gaming, with a decent experience.
an intel i7 cpu has been labeled as 4.20GHz?
hand me the blunt, let's celebrate this dank achievement.
Yep. 7700K has a stock base clock of 4.20GHz
A lot of potential in this channel just on initial opinions, your gonna go far man!
I have an i3-7100 and it's 2 or 3 differences from the i7-7700 I bought after a year of solid pc usage. Now I need more ram and power just to game, but Destiny 2 free is great between the Steam/Bungie crashes. It ain't my pc. Thanks for the vid!
Just bought the msi gaming pro carbon cost 270$ the i7 8700k unlocked chip cost 570$ and 2 8gb adata 3000mhz rgb ram cost 315$ the thermaltake 360 water cooler cost 260$ and an ssd 250 GB crusiall 115$ and a 700 watt thermaltake rgb psu cost 100$ cheapest I could get it here in australia
how are you getting such low fps on crysis? I have my dell xps and runs crysis 3 on medium at 1080p at 35 fps and you get 3 times worse? how??????
"Overwatch" "Competitive"
*Those 2 don't go together*
The real problem is crashing. Got so many problems trying to play GTA V on my i5-6600K while waiting for my 1060.
*Battlefield 1:* 28-30 fps (Res. Scale 0.75)
*COD WW2:* 25-30 fps (light shutters, playable)
*Far Cry 5/New dawn:* Avg. 22 fps(All low, TAA enabled, res. scale 0.6)
*PUBG lite:* 30-35 fps (High graphics 720p)
*GTA V:* Avg. 35 fps(Low 720p, anti aliasing enabled)
*Watch Dogs:* 25-30 fps (FXAA, all low)
*Tom Clancy's Rainbow 6 siege:* 25-30 fps lowest
*Dying light:* 25-35 fps avg.(lowest 720p)
*Resident evil:* Every games playable(lowest)
*Crysis 2/3:* Lowest settings, 22-25 fps
*Warface:* FPS
This is the first video of yours I've watched and I have a few things to say.
First: SOUTH AFRICA??? Dude, no way! I heard you say that the RAM was provided by Wootware and my mind kind of flipped on itself like "He's American...but I he got his RAM from Wootware...Does not compute error404 logic not found..." then it clicked that you live here in the good ole land of milk and honey.
Second: Great channel man.
Haha, thanks. You from SA as well?
UFDisciple Ya, for sure. Lived here all my life. Love it here. Glad to see more tech channels to come out of this place, we need more higher profile RUclips channels like yours to propell our RUclips space XD Keep up the great work.
Nice! Thanks for the support!
I thought your shirt said Keep Calm and Keep Calm upside down. Also it's amazing to see these chips can pump out so much performance on such tiny thing.
i wonder why all the video that test this IGPU uses 1080p because i played withcer on it in 720p and its giving me more fps on in low settings.
I was surprised he could lift the computer with his mighty arms...
> benchmarks an iGPU
> runs all of them in 1080p
probably all of the games tested here will be playable 20-30 fps if you set it to 720p or even 1024x768 ofc if you set it to high res it will choke the GPU
On Overwatch did you even try turn the render scale down to 50%? Because on a i7 laptop CPU, it runs at a more solid 50-60 FPS. It isn't the latest cpu on the market but it is about a 2 year old cpu. Now I wonder what the desktop equivalent would be
+Polrous No, I didn't. Because I was attempting to see how it ran actually at 1080P. Render scale and lower resolution would increase the frame rate. The point wasn't to see how you could get games to be playable on the HD 630, but how the HD 630 handled games at a particular resolution set. Different objectives which led to different methods.
how does the integrated graphics compare to the lowest end discrete graphics, like, say, GT 710 - GT 740? Just out of curiocity
Slightly better than the GT 710, a bit worse than the others, but roughly the same. Check my GT 710 review to see how it compares to the HD 530 & AMD APU.
Please tell me the name of the song that's playing while Overwatchtest. 5min and so on.
I have used the HD 530 in my 6700K for gaming while I was between graphics cards. To my surprise it even overclocked well! But at 1080p it struggled in modern games apart from the likes of Rocket League. 900p was the sweet spot (with a hefty OC to 1450MHz mind you). Normally I just use it for an additional display, but not for actual games.
+Rich Tea Makes sense! Thanks for the feedback!
I have a question. what is faster, Intel G4620 hd630 ___ OR ____ G4620 w/ radeon 6670 dedicated card.
That's precious. The HD 630 is comparable to my Macbook Air's HD 6000.
I been testing both intel and amd igpus what's your opinion it seems like amd had a decent igpu back in 2012 and 2013 but so does intel with there first intel hd4000 and now even 630. It seems like intel is a lot more stable. I really wanted more affordable igpu gaming systems I just built two one with intel and one with amd I keep getting crashes on amd both builds are 300 dollars.
Hi,
I wish you can answer to my question. Ok, games run at a resonable FPS and some of them are playable. I am building a gaming PC and buying components every month. Right now I am at the last step, the GPU. I can't affoard it in 1 month so I have to wait 2 instad. My question is: am I going to harm my CPU in a certain way during long periods of time playing games on the intel HD graphics card? The games I am reffering to are CS GO, World of Tanks, Path of Exile and other low requiremant games like Half Life 2, Dishonored, Cod mw 2, 3.
The CPU that I have is the Intel i7 skylake 6700k.
Thank you for this video you provided me with some good info and I hope you or someone will give me an answer about my doubt (of getting my CPU harmed by playing long periods of time)
I'm in the process of a pc build and just can't afford my gpu for another month but I am running 32 gigs of 3200 ram and a kaby lake processor so I'm going to see what results I get while I wait for my gtx 1080 for kicks
As a 17 year old aspiring to work on computers for a living, I can only hope that by time I'm your age I too could have such an incredible beard.
+Animu Scrub Haha, I only hope that by the time I'm one month older I can get rid of this gigantic mess on my face. #10KSubsCantComeSoonEnough
You can easily play older titles at 720p high settings and get a constant enough 60FPS. I got a full play through out of the original Mass Effect on my 6600k before my GPU arrived.
but how do you install the graphics drivers. just built my first pc with the i7-7700k and every driver says "Your computer does not meet the minimum requirements to install this software." Even the ones straight of the intel site. Even the driver update software thinks there are no drivers to be installed. I mean unless I'm missing something here...
+James Logue Are you on Windows 10?
Yes
Actualy, not all HD630 performs the same. Take i7-7700 and i5-8400 for example, the HD630 embeded in them both have a base frequency of 350MHz, but 7700 has a max dynamic frequency of 1.15GHz whereas 8400 can only reach 1.05GHz. That's also the reason I have to give up 8400 and choose 7700.
+john blake The 8400 is a completely different CPU family
RAM speeds really don't affect gaming performance. RAM speed is never going to be the bottleneck of your system.
u tried to run 1080p on a IGPU? what were u thinking man?
How do you upgrade a Kaby Lake HD 630 integrated graphics card?
If I'm willing to run at 720p, and I'm using a 7350k (dual channel, 2x4gb 2400mhz), will any of these games run better? I hope that 720p will increase fps. I'm waiting for my 1060 to come in, so...
I made a super small itx portable gaming rig with 7860k a10 apu 8gb ram, 120gb SSD and an isk antec case this computer can run windows and play games it's smaller than a PS4 pro!
On Overwatch and some other games, you can turn down resolution scaling lower than 100% to get a smooth 60fps on Intel HD Graphics. I'm doing it on my laptop.
wow !! i did not think you are from south africa. job well done
5:50 background song ?
I can't wait until Vulkan supports multi GPU stuff. Just imagine using one of these IGPUs to give you a few extra FPS in games by default.
What's your take on AMD APU vs intel iris540 both system seem to game decently my testing shows amd can run older titles better but not some newer ones I love the value of amds systems but I'm so annoyed that it has instability!
You should have benched 720p, the rez better suited for these chips.
I don't agree.
720p Would make more sense, under 30 fps on Overwatch isn't very enjoyable and The settings are already on low.
+pinatasrule Please see my other comments on why 1080P was chosen for testing.
it's ridiculous using 1080p for integrated graphics, the memory bandwidth and computational performance of the iGPU isn't adapted for it. 720p is less than half the pixel count and would definitely make the performance more appealing.
It bought a laptop for school with an i5 7440hq and an intel hd 630. Could i play CS GO on full hd middle settings?
ScopeN0Ob yep if u turn the resolution to 720p easy 100 fps
I want to try but the GTX1050 is disturbing. Can anyone tell me a way to use the integrated graphics without removing the GTX1050
Rockstar really knows how to optimize games. And they also care.
I was thinking about upgrading old core2duo to quad extreme, but with new pentium out - fuck 775!
If you disable motion blur, depth of field and other blurring technologies and can get plenty more FPS.
I saw the Crysis and Witcher had these on.. I wonder if you had these disabled how better would perform.
can an old VGA card (radeon HD 4600 series) improve performance if combined with HD 630?
So good to see another Will it Play video! Whoooo! :D
how about its performance on the older titles? those 2010's and older would be more appropriate
I played ARMA 3 on only a i3 6100 3.7GHz and i have settings mixed from Med, High, and Ultra and avg a 38FPS in a full server of deathmatch.
I need help please. Will intel plus 640 graphics with 8 gb of ram, 2.3ghz dual i5 run sims 4 on medium? Or higher
This is fucking amazing. My crappy laptop can't even run CSGO 30 FPS low settings. 980x678 and I used regedit to make it look even worse. Skins are like wet paint on a gun. Then smeared. This is fucking great.
Pretty awesome progress in the iGPU space. In years to come some people will be able to consider using just that for lesser demanding games.
Do you reckon it can handle PS2 games like Shadow of the Colossus at 1080p?
Help a buddy out.
*Edit* so should I use my intel hd 4600 wich has 1gb ddr3
I have a radeon hd 5670 512mb
gddr5 almost fullu oc'd.
900mhz core clock
1050 memory clock
I5 4590s 3.0ghz, 3.9 turbo
4gb ddr3 1600mhz
Any experience with World of Warcraft, War Thunder, Overlord games?
Isn't Intel 630 using the ram memory! so how big to make my ram to take it's maximum? & how is it's maximum?
I got a question if I only use to play games on my pc does overclocking worth it? I mean I've i5 6500 gtx 1070 and ddr4 2133mhz do I need to go for z-board and unlocked chip?
7100 is what 7350 should have been priced around, what a dunderfuck of a cpu.
Where does the claim "without dual channel frame rate is 40% lower" come from? I'm asking since
for CPUs dual channel or not isn't much of a difference these days (like 2% or so).
+Conenion My previous videos where I've tested out single vs dual channel. CPUs don't need the dual channel, but the iGPUs do since it's their source of VRAM.
Also, keep in mind, I did say "up to" many games won't experience a loss like that, but still a noticeable dip.
its called HD and not FullHD iGPU. so why you didnt give a try to test the igpu in 720p?
Wow, really?
hi, im just to buy one i5 of thats. can somebody how knows tell me if it's apu runs street fighter V, killer instinct and Moral Kombat x in low grapfics plase ? thaks
And me here, waiting for my new Power Supply to arrive and not shut my PC off everytime it goes over 300W...
Intel HD Graphics Accelerator bros! My CPU was an i3-350M codename: Arrandale.
Why only 1080p? Come on.
Using a 630 as a videogame chip requires fast ram setup in a dual channel.
atleast 3000 MHz recommended .
And judging by the peformance this isn't the case. Kinda looks like a standard 2133 ram setup.
i really like you put so.much effort into bugdet builds and solutions!
not everyone can afford the builds of ltt and jayztwocents...
yea i am greek :-D :-P :-P
+Lazarus The adventurer Thanks!
you should have fun the tests at lower resolutions that would have been interesting
I'll get a i7-7700k next week, after that I only need a GPU, which I'll buy in March.
So, with the i7-7700k and 16GB DDR4 RAM can I at least enjoy Dragon Age Origins, Day of Defeat Source, till I buy a GTX 1070?
That is crysis 3, not crysis. So we still don't know if it can run crysis or not. Also 2400mhz ram as "the fastest ram possible"?! At least I was expecting 3000mhz memory.
if anyone can help me. My laptop have Kingston 2400 8g ram, can I for example buy a crucial or corsair 8g 2400 ram and put it in with the Kingston ??
thanks in advance
Im only going to rely on Intel hd graphics for about 2 weeks then I'm getting a gtx 1060 so I don't need dual channel ram.
You really should get dual channel regardless.
can you watch HD clips (1080p) on VLC and youtube with Intel HD 630?
+Hulla Baloo Should be alright.
overwatch can be a memory hog for the intel 530 and 630 graphics. If you want to play anywhere near 80fps turn down the resolution to 720p and if you want lower the scaling for that too.
when can we expect a new intel hd igpu that surprasses the hd630?
1 year? 2?