The marking of the truck is irregular. The numbers are missing from the first ADR plate, which is unacceptable for a container transport, the danger number on the back plate is not 99, but 2Y. I don't understand why? The UN3257 bitumen has the hazard identification number 99 and not 2Y. It is interesting that the video is about safety and yet the basic marking is problematic.
Your correct if referring to ADR regulations. But as this is most probably a uk delivery from a uk collection point, it will run under CDG regulations. So ADR numbers are required once he travels abroad with it. CDG regulations don’t require any numbers on the front hazard board, and use the emergency action code (EAC), 2Y, above the UN number, rather than the hazard number, 99. So in the instance of this video it is acceptable.
I guess you're not in Britain, @Busman114 Nothing "irregular" about it when it is a UK domestic regulation journey under CDG (Carriage of Dangerous Goods and Transportable Pressure Equipment Regulations, 2009, as well as other amendments) "2Y"" is an Emergency Action Code, which is what is used under CDG, whereas HIN are only used for INTERNATIONAL road journeys (ADR) UN3257 ELEVATED TEMPERATURE LIQUID, N.O.S, Class 9, EAC is 2Y, HIN is 99
![Ice On My Teeth - ATEEZ エイティーズ 에이티즈 [Music Bank] | KBS WORLD TV 241115](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/c-n92OgbbwA/mqdefault.jpg)
The marking of the truck is irregular. The numbers are missing from the first ADR plate, which is unacceptable for a container transport, the danger number on the back plate is not 99, but 2Y. I don't understand why? The UN3257 bitumen has the hazard identification number 99 and not 2Y. It is interesting that the video is about safety and yet the basic marking is problematic.
Your correct if referring to ADR regulations. But as this is most probably a uk delivery from a uk collection point, it will run under CDG regulations. So ADR numbers are required once he travels abroad with it. CDG regulations don’t require any numbers on the front hazard board, and use the emergency action code (EAC), 2Y, above the UN number, rather than the hazard number, 99.
So in the instance of this video it is acceptable.
I guess you're not in Britain, @Busman114
Nothing "irregular" about it when it is a UK domestic regulation journey under CDG (Carriage of Dangerous Goods and Transportable Pressure Equipment Regulations, 2009, as well as other amendments)
"2Y"" is an Emergency Action Code, which is what is used under CDG, whereas HIN are only used for INTERNATIONAL road journeys (ADR)
UN3257 ELEVATED TEMPERATURE LIQUID, N.O.S, Class 9, EAC is 2Y, HIN is 99
Great