Peoples results with teleconverters, especially the 2x vary a great deal, and it comes down to how you use them. Firstly they need a great main lens, like the 70-200 z. Then you need great light to get the best out of them. Good handholding technique / stable platform also works wonders. But by far the biggest differences between people who love and hate teleconverters, is people who use the 2x tc to try and photograph a subject that is far too far away and then heavily crop the image in post. In this case you have the wrong focal length lens, either buy a longer lens or practise better fieldcraft to get closer to your intended subject. I have seen, countless times, photographers putting on a tc to try and get a little bit closer to a tiny subject that is clearly far too far away to be captured. they then immediately zoom in on the back screen to inspect this tiny dot of a bird and wonder why there is no detail. If you use a tc as intended such as to fill the frame (say 50%) with your subject then they can be a superb addition to your camera bag. Used in this way my z9, 70-200z and 2xtc show very little image degradation from the 70-200 is used bare.
Thanks for the review, I currently have the 2.0 converter and Z 7 II on backorder, just recently received the Z 70-200 2.8 s, this setup is an upgrade from my DX 5300 which has the 55-300 Zoom Lens
Good choice! I hope you love it, the 2.0 converter I think the jury is still out on, have you considered the superb 1.4x teleconverter? ruclips.net/video/sTDQxL9K7v0/видео.html it's amazing.
so a year later. I got the z 2xTC as a stop-gap to give me some reach ahead of a longer z. Now we have the 100-400 zoom and a 400mm prime -- both can use it, tho the prime at £14k is way out of my reach. Call me an enthusiastic amateur. I also sold the F 200-500 which in fact, due to its weight, I rarely used. The z 70-200 is a dream,. light enough to be a carry around and super sharp. AFAIK ALL teleconverters tend to soften the image. The 1.4 is amazing, yet I'm really pleased with the images I get.
Nice one, the 100-400 looks tempting but I like my 200-500 too much haha. I would have loved to do some follow up videos - they are still in the works but honestly the last 6 months has been a bit of a roller coaster. I realise that TCs all soften but the 1.4 is almost imperceptible which is mad. I’m going to try and do more testing with the 2.0. I’ve got lots of good photos with it but for me I really want to do an analytical video on it - just need to find the time 😩
Great to hear and thank you for your kind comment. I think there's definitely a sweet spot at 1.4 and as you say the 280mm F/4 lens is basically as good as a 300 F/4 which is bonkers. Thanks also for being a subscriber :)
@@HamerReviews thats interesting as i part-ex'd my 300m f4 to help get the Z6ii and 70-200 as i didnt use it too much. if i get the 1.4 TC i can get it back then !
Thank you for such honest and helpful reviews. My f mount zoom is not great so I have been thinking about this combination. I think based on your rec I will go with the 1.4 converter and the lens instead of the 2.0 Very helpful!
I'm glad you found it useful. As I said in the video, I'm still working on my exact opinion on the 2.0 Z, but it's in no way as good as the 1.4 which is nothing short of stunning. You just can't tell it's on the lens! The other option if you need reach is the 200-500 F mount, which I think is superb as well! If you haven't already please consider subscribing, it really helps me :)
I have the Nikkor Z 70-200 mm f/2.8 S which replaced my Tamron 70-200 mm G2 since it struggles to focus when mounted on my Z6. The Tamron build quality was not as good as the Nikon. I bought the Tamron last November 2019 and brought it with me to the Galapagos. The markings for the buttons on the lens started to fade, and some were already hard to read. I was very disappointed. My experiences with third party lenses are not great so far. I'll be sticking with the main brands from now on. The Z 70-200 mm f/2.8 S is an amazing lens. It is really sharp and the autofocus is fast and silent. Build quality is very good as well. I also got the Z 1.4 TC. However, I was not able to use it since I didn't realize until I'm on the field that I have to upgrade the firmware on the Z6 to be able to use it. I was thinking of getting the 2X tele as well to make the 70-200 mm be a 140-400 mm f/5.6 and hoping the lens will become my wildlife lens with a small form factor. I saw a couple of reviews that are giving it a very good review, but I am still skeptical. And your review is very helpful. I leaning towards the F-mount 500 mm f/5.6 PF with its size and weight. And as a prime lens, it should be sharp and with very good contrast. I guess I'll wait some more. I'm glad the 1.4 TC is getting great reviews. I updated the firmware on the Z6 and I will have a chance to test it out soon.
Thanks for your comment, I hope you enjoy your new gear! The quality of the 70-200 2.8 S is second to none. I think if you need super telephoto, the 500mm PF would be the best best, and then maybe the 200-500 which is a very versatile very sharp lens. The 2.0 Z might be OK, but I need to spend much more time with it in better conditions. The upcoming 100-400 with 1.4 TC might be a good choice too? The firmware thing is an annoyance isn't it, I've had that too! I hope you enjoy the 1.4, it's a great teleconverter and perfect combo with the 70-200. Please consider subscribing to support the channel :)
Very well explained video ! I am exactly at the point where I should take a decision : 1) should I buy one Z-TC20x ? 2) should I buy an used 200-500 f/5.6 & FTZ ? (plenty are avaiable for good price) 3) shoud I wait upcoming 100-400 or better 200-600 ? My experience with TC20iii was so bad in the past (D850 & 300 / 500 PF). I was loosing so much sharpness. AF was quiet difficult with 500 PF in low light condition. Considering the high price tag of this Z-TC20iii, it is better to be excellent. Based on your review, I am not sure it deserve this price ...
Thanks for your kind comment, please subscribe to support my channel :). To answer your questions: 1) should I buy one Z-TC20x I think only you can choose that, I personally think the 1.4 is absolutely worth it, but the 2.0 I'm not sure, perhaps rent it or test it out - assuming you have the 70-200 2.8 S 2) should I buy an used 200-500 f/5.6 & FTZ ? (plenty are avaiable for good price) I think this is a fantastic combo and it works great for me, you can check out the review on my channel here: ruclips.net/video/7eSRgVxbyiw/видео.html 3) shoud I wait upcoming 100-400 or better 200-600 ? It depends, they will be good but I doubt as cost effective as the 200-500 (though Nikon could surprise us all) but it all depends on when you need the lenses? It could be that they don't come out till late next year... If you have the 500 PF I'd stick with that and maybe the TC 1.4 III but I don't think the 2.0 Z is going to be that much better on Z mount. And just remember that the Z teleconverters will only work with Z mount lenses. Not F mount ones.
@@HamerReviews Many thanks for your answers and comments. I own the fabulous Z 70-200 f72.8 S and it's fantastic when use with Z-TC14x and my Z6ii. Focal length almost reach 300 mm at f/4 which is still nice even in low light condition. Nevertheless, I am still missing few hundreds mm to be more close to my subjects. I am tempted by the 200-500 F/5.6 with FTZ adapter but I am not so keen to invest in F mount lens anymore, especialy after I sold all my F mount gears. I will probably follow your advice and rent for a few days a Z-TC20x. This will give me enough inputs to take my decision.
Very informative! I am only now trying my Nikkor Z 70-200 mm with (newly unboxed) Nikon Teleconverter 2.0x using auto-focus (which, according to the Nikon website is an acceptable mode). Do you know why the message "Either no lens is attached, or the attached lens is a non-CPU lens. To shoot with a non-CPU lens, change the shooting mode to "P", "S", "A", or "M"" gets displayed? Note: I am able to shoot with the 70-200 mm lens without issues.
Nice video! The new grip with duel batteries will totally solve the front heavy lens with the 2X Converter! Problem easily solved at a steep cost of course!
Thanks for sharing, I'm not sure I agree entirely as I use mine with the MB-N10 and Z6 II and it is still quite front heavy, nothing that is impossible to handle though 🙂
I have the 2.0X. I'm by no means a pro, but it seems to me the issue is that you're putting it on one of the most impressive lenses there is, and so it's always going to feel like more of a trade-off than if the lens wasn't so good to begin with! The 70-200Z without a TC is just a joy to use, I got the TC because of nothing more than convenience, and I'm not earning money from my photos so it's just less to carry round for the times I might need a little more reach - it's an expensive indulgence for sure but I don't regret it (yet). :-)
Absolutely, it's a valid point. The 70-200 2.8S is absolutely sublime! I think though, that there's such a disparity between the 1.4 and 2.0 and that's my issue. That being said, I need to look into the 2.0 in more detail. My opinion my change when shooting in more ideal conditions.
I also have the TC-2.0x since early September in The Netherlands. And I agree it makes the images soft. The result is better than cropping/enlarging the image. But I do wonder about what the result would be when using the TC-1.4x with cropping/enlarging and compare it to a shot with the TC-2.0x. If that difference is minimal enough I might buy an TC-1.4x and enjoy the extra light that comes in through the slightly wider aperture as well.
If someone can test the tc 1.4x with a z7 or 7zii and crop compared to the tc 2.0x I think that would be a great comparison for all those in the market for the best quality and smallest form factor. I'd love to see a video or sample shots!
@@HamerReviews Since the images on the Z6(ii) also look softer when using the TC-2.0x when compared to TC-1.4x or no TC I think it's safe to say the sharpness of the Z mount 70-200mm with the TC-2.0x is well below the 24mpix resolution of the Z6(ii). Therefor I think it still might be a valid comparison between no TC, 1.4 and 2.0 on the Z6 system when enlarging to the 100% size of the TC-2.0x output. Even when the sharpness of the TC-1.4x would exceed the resolution of the Z6 but not the resolution of the Z7.
Exactly the video I was looking for. I am currently using the Z50 FTZ Adapter with the Tamron 150-600 F 6.3 and the auto focus is very fast (Updated my Tamron 150-600 with latest software). I do not see any reason to upgrade. Thank you!
No, that videos on my eternal ‘To do’ list. To me the 1.4 is still significantly better than the 2.0. Maybe I was harsh on the 2.0 initially but in anything less than ideal conditions I’ve rarely been impressed with it.
I was wondering if you had any updates on your opinion between the 1.4x and 2.0x. I have a Z6ii+70-200 lens. I got a hold of both converters and need to return one. Any help would be awesome, as you said not much out there in terms of reviews. Thanks
You really do not need a new version of Adobe Lightroom to open the NEF format of the Z6ii. I do open my NEF images directly with LightRoom by doing a simple trick! Copy the NEF file to a folder, then right click on it and select PROPERTIES. Click the DETAILS tab, and scroll down to CAMERA MODEL field, then simply change the "NIKON Z 6_2" to "NIKON Z 6" and click APPLY. Now you can open the NEF file
Sorry! I know right, I can’t make my mind up about it.... I wish I’d had it to test in September with better light. Going to make a point of spending more time with it in the coming weeks. Will report back then. Thanks for watching, please consider subscribing- it really helps the channel 🙂
I have a feeling you're right, I think the 1.4x is a better way to go if the quality holds, no point in extending reach if the quality is different. Thanks for your honest review, better than most out there.
Thanks for the kind feedback, the 1.4 is phenomenal in my view, which is why I think this had such a hard job. It will be interesting to see how it fares in better shooting conditions. Please consider subscribing to support the channel as it really helps🙂
@@KarenVaisman1, from 98mm - 280mm. I've had one for several days now, and it works seamlessly. It's hard to believe a teleconverter works this well, but here we are. : )
Yes, in my opinion it works very well, even with the Z6 it was excellent but I’m seeing some improvements on the Z6 II, the 200-500 is a powerful combination 🙂
I’m still waiting for good weather to be honest. Realistically I’m aiming to upload it this feb. The weather has been so bad I haven’t been able to get the test shots I need 🙁
i have just received my tc z 2,0 converter and i am unable to test it as my camera still hasnt arrived however i was wondering if it is normal if its normal to hear a rattle when gently shaking it ?
Just what I have been waiting for ..my Wild Life photography ..Do I wait for the slower 100-400 or get the 70-200 plus 2 x Conv..Landscapes , Portraits Plus Wildlife
It’s a tough question to answer. We don’t even know when the 100-400 may Launch, it could well be Q2/Q3/Q4, at which point, are you Ok waiting that long? If you do landscapes, the 70-200 by itself is STUNNING, so perhaps having that lens might be worth it in itself. The 100-400 I have high hopes for. Sorry I can’t be of more use, but please do consider subscribing as it really helps!
@@HamerReviews Thanks very much I need a Wild Life Lens for my annual Kruger Park Trip in Sept 2021 latest ..Sold my D850 and Tamron G2 150-600 to get the Z7 ..all I have so far is the 14-30 and the 2.8 version S lens 24-70 which is like bringing a Knife to a Gunfight for Wild Life Photography LOL
Be interesting to see image quality difference between tele converter 1.4 vs no tele converter on a z50 body which will give you a 1.5x crop vs Z6/7. Not much of a price difference between the tele converter and the z50 body only price. Also, you technically then have a tele converter 1.5 for all your lenses, not just 70-200
Go watch "Ricci Talks" review on this Teleconverter because he did a Full Comprehensive review with tons of images and very thorough critiques and he shows that there isn't ANY image fall off at all. Don't know what the hell this guy is talking about
Ricci is also a Nikon UK employee. So as much as you might think is critique is thorough, it’s certainly not unbiased. As such, rather than trusting someone who works for Nikon, I’d rather make my own mind up thanks.
I'm still in doubt, even after ordering (not getting...) the 2.0 When it comes to reviews with different opinions: why the hell trust one over the other just because you don't like what one says?? I'd say, don't look at any review but grab a brochure from the supplier. I prefer honest reviews. Certainty when they're not bashing a product, manufacturer or other reviewer. In short: thanks! But now I'm in doubt to cancel the 2.0 order and select the 1.4 Or no TC at all... Since the 70-200 is excellent, I don't want to ruin sharpness in the long range.
@@Hart-en-Ziel Hi Peter, thanks for your comment. So I have had more time with the 2.0 Z, frustratingly not in ideal conditions. I think it might be better than I initially expected, but you do need the available light to match. I'm still finding it easier to get successful results with the 200-500 F5.6 at the moment, but I question whether that's because I'm more uses to it? One the UK lockdown ends I'll get out and take photos in better conditions and record my follow up video. I'd advise keeping your preorder, my logic being that you shouldn't lose much if you sell it on eBay if it turns out you don't like the results. Whereas getting another 2.0 if you aren't satisfied with 280mm could take a very long time. I hope that helps, and please do follow me to support the channel, it really helps me out!
Peoples results with teleconverters, especially the 2x vary a great deal, and it comes down to how you use them. Firstly they need a great main lens, like the 70-200 z. Then you need great light to get the best out of them. Good handholding technique / stable platform also works wonders. But by far the biggest differences between people who love and hate teleconverters, is people who use the 2x tc to try and photograph a subject that is far too far away and then heavily crop the image in post. In this case you have the wrong focal length lens, either buy a longer lens or practise better fieldcraft to get closer to your intended subject. I have seen, countless times, photographers putting on a tc to try and get a little bit closer to a tiny subject that is clearly far too far away to be captured. they then immediately zoom in on the back screen to inspect this tiny dot of a bird and wonder why there is no detail. If you use a tc as intended such as to fill the frame (say 50%) with your subject then they can be a superb addition to your camera bag. Used in this way my z9, 70-200z and 2xtc show very little image degradation from the 70-200 is used bare.
Thanks for the review, I currently have the 2.0 converter and Z 7 II on backorder, just recently received the Z 70-200 2.8 s, this setup is an upgrade from my DX 5300 which has the 55-300 Zoom Lens
Good choice! I hope you love it, the 2.0 converter I think the jury is still out on, have you considered the superb 1.4x teleconverter? ruclips.net/video/sTDQxL9K7v0/видео.html it's amazing.
Another brilliant video and honest review of the teleconverters for the z Mount
Thanks, I'm still working on an in-depth look at this one but the weather has not been playing ball.
so a year later. I got the z 2xTC as a stop-gap to give me some reach ahead of a longer z. Now we have the 100-400 zoom and a 400mm prime -- both can use it, tho the prime at £14k is way out of my reach. Call me an enthusiastic amateur. I also sold the F 200-500 which in fact, due to its weight, I rarely used. The z 70-200 is a dream,. light enough to be a carry around and super sharp. AFAIK ALL teleconverters tend to soften the image. The 1.4 is amazing, yet I'm really pleased with the images I get.
Nice one, the 100-400 looks tempting but I like my 200-500 too much haha.
I would have loved to do some follow up videos - they are still in the works but honestly the last 6 months has been a bit of a roller coaster.
I realise that TCs all soften but the 1.4 is almost imperceptible which is mad.
I’m going to try and do more testing with the 2.0. I’ve got lots of good photos with it but for me I really want to do an analytical video on it - just need to find the time 😩
Very much appreciate the honest review. I have the 1.4 and love it. It's like having a brand new nigh 300mm f/4 lens!
Great to hear and thank you for your kind comment. I think there's definitely a sweet spot at 1.4 and as you say the 280mm F/4 lens is basically as good as a 300 F/4 which is bonkers. Thanks also for being a subscriber :)
@@HamerReviews thats interesting as i part-ex'd my 300m f4 to help get the Z6ii and 70-200 as i didnt use it too much. if i get the 1.4 TC i can get it back then !
Thank you for such honest and helpful reviews. My f mount zoom is not great so I have been thinking about this combination. I think based on your rec I will go with the 1.4 converter and the lens instead of the 2.0 Very helpful!
I'm glad you found it useful.
As I said in the video, I'm still working on my exact opinion on the 2.0 Z, but it's in no way as good as the 1.4 which is nothing short of stunning. You just can't tell it's on the lens!
The other option if you need reach is the 200-500 F mount, which I think is superb as well!
If you haven't already please consider subscribing, it really helps me :)
I have the Nikkor Z 70-200 mm f/2.8 S which replaced my Tamron 70-200 mm G2 since it struggles to focus when mounted on my Z6. The Tamron build quality was not as good as the Nikon. I bought the Tamron last November 2019 and brought it with me to the Galapagos. The markings for the buttons on the lens started to fade, and some were already hard to read. I was very disappointed. My experiences with third party lenses are not great so far. I'll be sticking with the main brands from now on. The Z 70-200 mm f/2.8 S is an amazing lens. It is really sharp and the autofocus is fast and silent. Build quality is very good as well. I also got the Z 1.4 TC. However, I was not able to use it since I didn't realize until I'm on the field that I have to upgrade the firmware on the Z6 to be able to use it. I was thinking of getting the 2X tele as well to make the 70-200 mm be a 140-400 mm f/5.6 and hoping the lens will become my wildlife lens with a small form factor. I saw a couple of reviews that are giving it a very good review, but I am still skeptical. And your review is very helpful. I leaning towards the F-mount 500 mm f/5.6 PF with its size and weight. And as a prime lens, it should be sharp and with very good contrast. I guess I'll wait some more. I'm glad the 1.4 TC is getting great reviews. I updated the firmware on the Z6 and I will have a chance to test it out soon.
Thanks for your comment, I hope you enjoy your new gear! The quality of the 70-200 2.8 S is second to none.
I think if you need super telephoto, the 500mm PF would be the best best, and then maybe the 200-500 which is a very versatile very sharp lens.
The 2.0 Z might be OK, but I need to spend much more time with it in better conditions. The upcoming 100-400 with 1.4 TC might be a good choice too?
The firmware thing is an annoyance isn't it, I've had that too!
I hope you enjoy the 1.4, it's a great teleconverter and perfect combo with the 70-200.
Please consider subscribing to support the channel :)
Very well explained video !
I am exactly at the point where I should take a decision :
1) should I buy one Z-TC20x ?
2) should I buy an used 200-500 f/5.6 & FTZ ? (plenty are avaiable for good price)
3) shoud I wait upcoming 100-400 or better 200-600 ?
My experience with TC20iii was so bad in the past (D850 & 300 / 500 PF). I was loosing so much sharpness. AF was quiet difficult with 500 PF in low light condition.
Considering the high price tag of this Z-TC20iii, it is better to be excellent. Based on your review, I am not sure it deserve this price ...
Thanks for your kind comment, please subscribe to support my channel :).
To answer your questions:
1) should I buy one Z-TC20x
I think only you can choose that, I personally think the 1.4 is absolutely worth it, but the 2.0 I'm not sure, perhaps rent it or test it out - assuming you have the 70-200 2.8 S
2) should I buy an used 200-500 f/5.6 & FTZ ? (plenty are avaiable for good price)
I think this is a fantastic combo and it works great for me, you can check out the review on my channel here: ruclips.net/video/7eSRgVxbyiw/видео.html
3) shoud I wait upcoming 100-400 or better 200-600 ?
It depends, they will be good but I doubt as cost effective as the 200-500 (though Nikon could surprise us all) but it all depends on when you need the lenses? It could be that they don't come out till late next year...
If you have the 500 PF I'd stick with that and maybe the TC 1.4 III but I don't think the 2.0 Z is going to be that much better on Z mount.
And just remember that the Z teleconverters will only work with Z mount lenses. Not F mount ones.
@@HamerReviews Many thanks for your answers and comments.
I own the fabulous Z 70-200 f72.8 S and it's fantastic when use with Z-TC14x and my Z6ii. Focal length almost reach 300 mm at f/4 which is still nice even in low light condition. Nevertheless, I am still missing few hundreds mm to be more close to my subjects. I am tempted by the 200-500 F/5.6 with FTZ adapter but I am not so keen to invest in F mount lens anymore, especialy after I sold all my F mount gears.
I will probably follow your advice and rent for a few days a Z-TC20x. This will give me enough inputs to take my decision.
@@frd-kj5qu curious if you rented and came to a conclusion?
@@KarenVaisman1 Not yet, I haven't rented it. So, I'm not in a position to conclude something good or bad.
Very informative! I am only now trying my Nikkor Z 70-200 mm with (newly unboxed) Nikon Teleconverter 2.0x using auto-focus (which, according to the Nikon website is an acceptable mode). Do you know why the message "Either no lens is attached, or the attached lens is a non-CPU lens. To shoot with a non-CPU lens, change the shooting mode to "P", "S", "A", or "M"" gets displayed? Note: I am able to shoot with the 70-200 mm lens without issues.
Have you updated the firmware on your camera for both the camera and lens plus TC?
@@HamerReviews Thanks so much for your suggestion. I just updated my firmware and all's good!
Nice video! The new grip with duel batteries will totally solve the front heavy lens with the 2X Converter! Problem easily solved at a steep cost of course!
Thanks for sharing, I'm not sure I agree entirely as I use mine with the MB-N10 and Z6 II and it is still quite front heavy, nothing that is impossible to handle though 🙂
I have the 2.0X. I'm by no means a pro, but it seems to me the issue is that you're putting it on one of the most impressive lenses there is, and so it's always going to feel like more of a trade-off than if the lens wasn't so good to begin with! The 70-200Z without a TC is just a joy to use, I got the TC because of nothing more than convenience, and I'm not earning money from my photos so it's just less to carry round for the times I might need a little more reach - it's an expensive indulgence for sure but I don't regret it (yet). :-)
Absolutely, it's a valid point. The 70-200 2.8S is absolutely sublime! I think though, that there's such a disparity between the 1.4 and 2.0 and that's my issue. That being said, I need to look into the 2.0 in more detail. My opinion my change when shooting in more ideal conditions.
I also have the TC-2.0x since early September in The Netherlands. And I agree it makes the images soft. The result is better than cropping/enlarging the image. But I do wonder about what the result would be when using the TC-1.4x with cropping/enlarging and compare it to a shot with the TC-2.0x. If that difference is minimal enough I might buy an TC-1.4x and enjoy the extra light that comes in through the slightly wider aperture as well.
If someone can test the tc 1.4x with a z7 or 7zii and crop compared to the tc 2.0x I think that would be a great comparison for all those in the market for the best quality and smallest form factor. I'd love to see a video or sample shots!
I don’t own a Z7 so I’ll bow out of that. That being said I think the Z6 II has more than enough resolution to highlight flaws and issues.
Jeroen. The 1.4 is absolutely the sweet spot
@@HamerReviews Since the images on the Z6(ii) also look softer when using the TC-2.0x when compared to TC-1.4x or no TC I think it's safe to say the sharpness of the Z mount 70-200mm with the TC-2.0x is well below the 24mpix resolution of the Z6(ii). Therefor I think it still might be a valid comparison between no TC, 1.4 and 2.0 on the Z6 system when enlarging to the 100% size of the TC-2.0x output. Even when the sharpness of the TC-1.4x would exceed the resolution of the Z6 but not the resolution of the Z7.
Exactly the video I was looking for. I am currently using the Z50 FTZ Adapter with the Tamron 150-600 F 6.3 and the auto focus is very fast (Updated my Tamron 150-600 with latest software). I do not see any reason to upgrade. Thank you!
Glad it was helpful! And thank you for subscribing 🙂
Did you release a full review on the TC 2.0x? I'd like to know your opinion on it after having used it extensively. I bought mine 3 weeks ago
No, that videos on my eternal ‘To do’ list.
To me the 1.4 is still significantly better than the 2.0. Maybe I was harsh on the 2.0 initially but in anything less than ideal conditions I’ve rarely been impressed with it.
Excellent and Honest Review... Thank You !
Glad it was helpful! Please subscribe as it really helps!
I was wondering if you had any updates on your opinion between the 1.4x and 2.0x. I have a Z6ii+70-200 lens. I got a hold of both converters and need to return one. Any help would be awesome, as you said not much out there in terms of reviews. Thanks
It’s on my list to do a more detailed comparison
You really do not need a new version of Adobe Lightroom to open the NEF format of the Z6ii. I do open my NEF images directly with LightRoom by doing a simple trick! Copy the NEF file to a folder, then right click on it and select PROPERTIES. Click the DETAILS tab, and scroll down to CAMERA MODEL field, then simply change the "NIKON Z 6_2" to "NIKON Z 6" and click APPLY. Now you can open the NEF file
This was the case on launch when Nikon released the cameras. It took about 1.5 months for Adobe camera raw to be updated 😉
excellent review much better than lots of crappy reviewers with head full of birds nest...
Thanks very much, appreciate the comment! I’ll be posting and updated review soon - make sure you subscribe so you don’t miss it! 🙂
Useful as I’m sitting on the fence too about purchasing the 2x converter and I’m still on the fence! 😂. I shall watch and see as I’m in no hurry.
Sorry! I know right, I can’t make my mind up about it.... I wish I’d had it to test in September with better light.
Going to make a point of spending more time with it in the coming weeks. Will report back then. Thanks for watching, please consider subscribing- it really helps the channel 🙂
I have the Tamron 70-200, do I need a Tamron teleconverter or will the nikon TC work with the Tamron?
They will work on F mount lenses, the Z mount ones won't.
I have a feeling you're right, I think the 1.4x is a better way to go if the quality holds, no point in extending reach if the quality is different. Thanks for your honest review, better than most out there.
Thanks for the kind feedback, the 1.4 is phenomenal in my view, which is why I think this had such a hard job. It will be interesting to see how it fares in better shooting conditions.
Please consider subscribing to support the channel as it really helps🙂
The 1.4 shoots at what fstop on the 70-200? You felt the quality on that tele was excellent?
@@KarenVaisman1 f4
@@cziegler1976 and extend the range to what? Thanks 🙏
@@KarenVaisman1, from 98mm - 280mm. I've had one for several days now, and it works seamlessly. It's hard to believe a teleconverter works this well, but here we are. : )
Great Hamer as usual
What do you think of the AF tracking for birds with the 200-500mm??? Is the hit rate good??
Thanks again
Mina
So the TC 2.0 Z won't work with that lens, but as a lens by itself it works very well in my opinion.
@@HamerReviews thanks for your reply and does it work with well with the new Nikon z6ii for AF tracking of moving objects??
Yes, in my opinion it works very well, even with the Z6 it was excellent but I’m seeing some improvements on the Z6 II, the 200-500 is a powerful combination 🙂
Do you know when the follow up video might get uploaded?
I’m still waiting for good weather to be honest. Realistically I’m aiming to upload it this feb. The weather has been so bad I haven’t been able to get the test shots I need 🙁
i have just received my tc z 2,0 converter and i am unable to test it as my camera still hasnt arrived however i was wondering if it is normal if its normal to hear a rattle when gently shaking it ?
Just what I have been waiting for ..my Wild Life photography ..Do I wait for the slower 100-400 or get the 70-200 plus 2 x Conv..Landscapes , Portraits Plus Wildlife
It’s a tough question to answer. We don’t even know when the 100-400 may Launch, it could well be Q2/Q3/Q4, at which point, are you Ok waiting that long? If you do landscapes, the 70-200 by itself is STUNNING, so perhaps having that lens might be worth it in itself. The 100-400 I have high hopes for.
Sorry I can’t be of more use, but please do consider subscribing as it really helps!
@@HamerReviews Thanks very much I need a Wild Life Lens for my annual Kruger Park Trip in Sept 2021 latest ..Sold my D850 and Tamron G2 150-600 to get the Z7 ..all I have so far is the 14-30 and the 2.8 version S lens 24-70 which is like bringing a Knife to a Gunfight for Wild Life Photography LOL
I have to say, I LOVE the 200-500 Nikon lens with FTZ adapter - I’ve got a review of that on my channel too
@@HamerReviews That would also be my recommandation or the fabulous 500 f5.6 PF & FTZ.
Be interesting to see image quality difference between tele converter 1.4 vs no tele converter on a z50 body which will give you a 1.5x crop vs Z6/7. Not much of a price difference between the tele converter and the z50 body only price. Also, you technically then have a tele converter 1.5 for all your lenses, not just 70-200
Being thinking of that too. Z50 + Z 70-200 + x2= 600mm vs Sigma Cont 150-600... Sure the 2X will work with future Z lens
Thanks both, will have to look at that!
Is the quality of sharpness good enough for aps-c? It would give you 600mm.
In ideal conditions, yes.
Can we use with Nikon d750 and 200-500mm
@@HamerReviews thank you so much 🙏
No .These are for Z mount camera like Z6 . There are F mount teleconverter for DSLR.
Sorry! I thought you were replying to a different video @sandeep! These are only for Z mount as Tony rightly points out
Thanks tony! I thought this was on a different video 🙄 my mistakeb
would this work with d3400?
Actually, what you are saying is that the quality with TC 2.0 is lower than without. Nothing new.
Actually what I’m saying is that the 1.4 is incredible and at this point I felt this wasn’t on par with the 1.4.
Jheeez £600!? 😨😨
Yeah I know right, I remember paying £400 for an older one many years ago and thinking that was steep - little did i know.
Go watch "Ricci Talks" review on this Teleconverter because he did a Full Comprehensive review with tons of images and very thorough critiques and he shows that there isn't ANY image fall off at all. Don't know what the hell this guy is talking about
Ricci is also a Nikon UK employee. So as much as you might think is critique is thorough, it’s certainly not unbiased. As such, rather than trusting someone who works for Nikon, I’d rather make my own mind up thanks.
I'm still in doubt, even after ordering (not getting...) the 2.0
When it comes to reviews with different opinions: why the hell trust one over the other just because you don't like what one says?? I'd say, don't look at any review but grab a brochure from the supplier.
I prefer honest reviews. Certainty when they're not bashing a product, manufacturer or other reviewer.
In short: thanks!
But now I'm in doubt to cancel the 2.0 order and select the 1.4
Or no TC at all...
Since the 70-200 is excellent, I don't want to ruin sharpness in the long range.
@@Hart-en-Ziel Hi Peter, thanks for your comment.
So I have had more time with the 2.0 Z, frustratingly not in ideal conditions. I think it might be better than I initially expected, but you do need the available light to match. I'm still finding it easier to get successful results with the 200-500 F5.6 at the moment, but I question whether that's because I'm more uses to it? One the UK lockdown ends I'll get out and take photos in better conditions and record my follow up video. I'd advise keeping your preorder, my logic being that you shouldn't lose much if you sell it on eBay if it turns out you don't like the results. Whereas getting another 2.0 if you aren't satisfied with 280mm could take a very long time.
I hope that helps, and please do follow me to support the channel, it really helps me out!
@@HamerReviews have you made a second review? I am now fully z mount and am trying to decide 1.4 or 2.0 or wait for 100-400. Thanks for your opinion!