Good job red state voters. So proud of my “fellow Americans”, treatment in the south. If you are able, leave red states. Also, women in the south, keep voting in these people, this is what happens. Ready to pay attention to politics yet?
I agree. When I see news like this, I'm glad I don't live in the Divided States of Embarrassment. How the hell can the "doctor" scramble to determine what to do (in that case)? Tomorrow there will be a news story about doctors refusing to treat a bullet wound, because the bullet might have a heartbeat
In my opinion denying a woman proper medical care when she presents in the ER with an ectopic pregnancy that's ready to burst is medical malpractice and negligence in the extreme! It is a well-known fact that there is no other option but to remove the ectopic fetus because there is no way that fetus can be viable within a fallopian tube and it is an eminent danger to the life of the mother! It is just appalling that doctors and emergency rooms are turning pregnant women away for fear of being sued or losing their medical license simply because they are doing what they were trained to do .. provide emergency medical treatment! In my opinion those Supreme Court judges that reversed Roe v Wade along with Donald Trump need to be held legally liable for each and every pregnant women that is turned away from the ER and denied medical treatment because of this absolutely insane unacceptable ruling! And in the event that a woman dies because of this barbaric Rule and treatment then they need to be charged with murder or at the very least manslaughter and gross medical practice and negligence!
Blame Abbott and Republican politicians in Texas. They did this….. and some voted for them. Careful what you wish for because it may touch you personally.
@@noigelskram2435 First of all, we don't pay for the healthcare of foreigners. We cover the emergency room, purely life-saving care only. Covering preventative measures would actually be cheaper overall. Secondly, we actually can afford both. Raise taxes on the wealthy and large corporations. Cut spending in other areas. It's a policy choice to focus on corporate subsidies and a bloated defense budget rather than healthcare for our citizens, or even housing for our veterans. If every other developed country (with lower GDPs and a higher number of immigrants per capita) can figure this out, so can we. I refuse to believe that the US is just too stupid to figure out something that EVERY other developed country has managed.
@@sbffsbrarbrr i agree "lets get better healthcare lets, lets tax the rich more, lets make these policies laws so people can keep their rights" then they let republicans charge us and our kids and increase our taxes and still want us to vote for them like they will do anything
*"every single Trump appointed supreme court justice said they wouldn't overturn Roe v. Wade"* False. - Barrett stated outright that she thought Roe was wrongly decided, indicating her intent to overturn Roe V Wade, stating that 'it can and should be overruled'. - Kavanaugh avoided answering whether Roe v. Wade was correctly decided, or how he might rule in a future case challenging that court ruling. Instead, Kavanaugh repeatedly said that Roe v. Wade was 'settled as precedent'. - Gorsuch said that the Roe decision was 'precedent' but declined to call it 'super precedent' a loosely defined term indicating a deeply rooted, repeatedly upheld precedent. He also declined to give his opinion on whether he thought the court’s ruling was correct.
Good luck getting that done too! Many women can’t have this done without 1) being married and/or have children already or B) being harassed endlessly with comments like “when you’re older, you’ll regret it.” “What about your future husband? Wouldn’t he want kids?” “You don’t know what you want right now.” All of this has been used to force women into less reproductive freedoms.
I wonder if you can sue the Supreme Court. I mean, when a group of people lie and screw up theirs job and people are harmed, you have the right to sue right.
@@noigelskram2435 ~155,959 square miles of land & you're only focused on one city, but hey we are doing just fine in San Francisco thank you for asking
Unfortunately that's not necessarily negligence but fear; the fear of losing one's license, the possibility of jail/prison time. This is the government's overreaching action! As a side note, no men were harmed in these cases (to the best of my knowledge). Unfortunately quite a few women and their now unborn fetus' became casualties to a judgement that was most likely heralded by quite a few men!
For any republican that should happen to see this video, is this your idea of freedom? What happened to republicans NOT wanting big government to get in between a person and their doctor? Isn't that what republicans claimed to hate about the ACA(Obamacare)? These horror stories should be forced into the faces of every politician and judge that played a part in these bans. Also I'm surprised there hasn't been a wave of lawsuits for these mishandled abortion complications yet, but I imagine that will come soon enough.
Moral of story if you are of child baring age or have female children move out of states that ban abortion. I have 3 daughters i would move them if need be
This is horrific, can anybody support this? We have returned to the middle ages. Please everyone vote for Dems, not great but a start. Love and Peace to all the women of the world. Shaking the Tree, Peter Gabriel
Biden has already addressed this, and Texas threw a tantrum. "Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) is suing the Biden administration over federal rules requiring abortions to be provided in medical emergencies to save the life of the mother."
If I was a medical professional in that situation I would save the mother’s life even if it cost me my career. Because there’s no way I would be able to live with myself for turning a patient away knowing there is a very good chance they will die. Sometimes you have to do the right thing even when your chain of command tells you it’s the wrong thing.
@@beeforeal5497 Isn't it open to interpretation? You say it's not malpractice, but the state then argues that it is. You'll be held up in court for a long time. Your practice will be restricted if not outright suspended.
No, it isn't open to interpretation when the law specifically makes exceptions for tubal pregnancies. This is nothing but hospital administrations playing politics with patience lives and I hope these women get millions of dollars from the jerk wads who are purposely putting them through torture even though the law is on the side of the women. I don't even blame the doctors. I believe the doctors are being told by higher ups what they can and can't do because administration calls the shots, not doctors, even though most people are completely unaware of that.
First of all, the responsibility lies with voters who put politicians, who appointed judges, into office. It's strange that such a concern for human life doesn't extend to providing pre/post natal care to ensure healthy mothers and babies or helping families who can't feed their children. Most of all, the same people who are most offended by "abortion" totally ignore the rampant child sex abuse in their own churches.
Make banning abortion make sense? I understand if people got help to pay for the child and the government had more care for kids, but sense they don't is ridiculous.
They should not complain about the hospials they should take action against them. They have made these woman prospectivly infertile through medical negligence.
@@Jenifer_R_ It should be the same here. In the meantime, the ACA has given MILLIONS of people affordable or free healthcare when they previously couldn't afford it.
I live in Texas. I had about ectopic pregnancy in 2011. I didn't have to go to an emergency room, just my gynecologist because I was having severe pain. She gave me the drug you mentioned.
To hell with that. Sue the piece of crap, hate mongering and corrupt republican lawmakers passing these laws controlling women. Nutcase American taliban weirdo republican lawmakers trying to control women.
This actions taken by the hospitals were legal, in the state of texas. No malpractice here. Look up texan woman Katie Cox and her attempt at health care.
So because abortion is illegal in some states, hospitals refuse to help pregnant women in ERs?? You really need to establish cause and effect because at face value this seems nonsensical
because when they treat them and that treatment technically involves ending the pregnancy to safe the mother's life, they have to make damn sure they can prove that the procedure was indeed necessary and is a legal exception. They know the law exists to punish them for any such procedure, and even if they believe they may be in legal territory with what they're doing, they're risking getting thrown in prison for doing it regardless. You'd need to at least have a lawyer present to even be half sure that just doing your job won't get you locked up. Would you risk that?
“A bunch of living cells” that have their own unique DNA is what you are. Nobody has ever had any Right to take away your life from you. You are not a tonsil. Jeremiah 1:5 -google it.
@@hangingby-a-thread A tumor has its own unique DNA - who gaf? A human being is a complete, independent organism consisting of complex organs and organ systems that work together to sustain the whole. A human being has a functioning cerebral cortex that allows thought, feeling, sensation and self awareness. Mindless, insensate, nonviable tissue is NOT a human being regardless of its potential. Claiming it's a person is just stupid.
@@fay5479 It's not even an actual heartbeat because obviously there isn't a heart formed yet. They have equated electric pulses that can only be sensed by the advanced technology of ultrasounds with a beating heart. And while these pulses are generated because of the cellular shit that's happening to create that life, they still don't represent a heartbeat like all living humans have. But the way I see it is if it's in my body, it doesn't have any rights that supercede mine, not until it's capable of surviving outside of my body.
Just send J.D. Vance the bill, doc. Since he is 100% behind Nature “taking its course” in pregnancy. In fact, we’ll remember he said that if he ever has a grossly disabled or suffering child. God forbid. (But honestly, I’m so sorry this happened to you. No doctor I know would do such a thing).
Even if they oppose truly elective abortion, or oppose truly elective surgical abortion after 6, 8, 10, or 12 weeks, they still need to leave it to doctors to decide how to prioritize the woman’s safety, which means allowing medically indicated abortion up to 20 weeks, and then to prioritize live births after 20 weeks. No doctor should be liable criminally of civilly for performing abortion, so long as he had certified that there was a medical need to protect the woman’s safety in terms of an even moderately extraordinary risk. And no woman should be held liable for consenting to an abortion on her doctor’s advice that there is an even moderately extraordinary risk. Imagine the mistrust that conservative legislators must have for doctors that they think they can make a vague one time rule which a random judge can adjudicate the matter after the fact.
Idk the specifics of these cases but my medical 2 cents: methotrexate is typically not used if there is fetal cardiac activity because it has a high failure rate. The preferred choice is surgery, a salpingostomy or salpingectomy, which these women ultimately had anyway.
That's not correct. Women do not and have not ever had an absolute right to abortion, the life of the child has always been a consideration ; even Roe v Wade limited the period in which abortions can be obtained to 23 weeks.
@@gamefax5741 No man would risk the life of the woman over a fetus that could cause her death. These women lost being able to have a family over something that would’ve never been born. How is that right?
@@NNicholeHE *"In these situations it was no life."* - There is no legal prohibition on extracting an unborn child that is dead. - The refusal of medical practitioners to perform the procedure in such instances was most likely due to confusion resulting from the recent legal changes and we would not expect it to occur again now the new laws are firmly in-place.
@@noigelskram2435- False, yet again. The right have been trying to suppress abortion rights for decades. Why would they fund something they hate? Common sense, bro, quit lying.
God everyone, nothing but the most divine figure who cares for everyone. Unless of course we are taking the humans, who are telling us what he wants themselves. Religion is nothing but control by those who abuse it for themselves, people who can't accept reality and need anything to have them live in denial and take the easy way out. These actions enable these people who get to pass laws like this.
An ectopic pregnancy can’t in the first place _become_ a fetus (or even an embryo, I think) unless relocated to a proper womb (which might be technological rather than natural). So, using the term in this context is misleading.
An ectopic pregnancy IS a pregnancy. The embryo just isn't implanted where it should be to develop properly and be viable. There is no known medical technique permitting the transfer of the embryo to the uterus, and there is no safe outcome for the mother without medical intervention. The tissu around the ectopic pregnancy often ruptures from week 6 to week 16, with the embryo developing into a fetus around week 9.
A fallopian tube is at most 5 inches long and 0.6 inches in diameter. Does not seem possible that a fetus (10 weeks of pregnancy) would even be viable in the tiny fallopian tube, which means there could not be a heartbeat. Politicians are making rules about a potential being that is nowhere near a viable lifeform at that stage, but the woman could die if the tube ruptures and causes peritonitis
An ectopic pregnancy is never viable as it will eventually rupture the fallopian tube and it cannot be moved or re-implanted in the uterus, but cardiac activity (not quite the same as a heartbeat) can sometimes be detected via ultrasound as early as 6 weeks. That is how my ectopic pregnancy was diagnosed prior to 10 weeks (in my case closer to 7-8 weeks).
What a failure you are @Teddycheong, it's wanted pregnancies ending in rotting babies killing their mothers with sepsis or loss of fertility so they can't start a family at all. You don't go to the hospital for a 17$ pill to end a possible pregnancy chance the morning after, these are real women in crisis, you're the ghouls who will have to answer for having a hand in allowing a woman to die with the dead child she is carrying. If you could get pregnant, and that child began to rot you would be demanding help and we would be right to leave you to suffer the way you gleefully wish others do.
Some states will restrict abortions more than others. Whatever your state decides accept it, or decide to leave. It's your choice. It's a complete non-issue since the Supreme Court placed it in the jurisdiction of the states, not the federal government. All issues on abortion are the domain of the state legislatures.
@@TheJLHThe "democrats" are making an issue out of a non issue by acting like the federal government has some power over "abortion". The Supreme Court explicitly ruled that the states have the power, not the federal government.
People or government should start to percecute these doctors and judges that make these sort of illegal decisions. Like if the state tries to sue people for getting pregancies, government should make sure that everyone who does not go along with the US laws, will be put to jail for a long time, and that this includes doctors, judges and everyone involved in these decisions. I mean here the doctors neglected the patient, medical malpractice, putting her life on risk, caused them enormous emotional damage, caused her not to have kids anymore. I think they need to go to jail for a long time for doing this to anyone, especially since its illegal according to US laws. But US government or any officials does not seem to care much at all, other than using that stuff against their political opposition, but still not actually doing anything about it. Makes me wonder is DNC is actually even against these southern delusions. Or if they want to keep up the situation and use it as a political tool. Judges making illegal rulings, doctors putting patients life at risk and not following doctoral ethics, causing physical and mental harm to their patients, who they should be healing etc etc. But no one seems to care, except in talk. Biden and DNC could do so much about this right now, but they dont want to. And since it seems like trump has a good chance of winning, well then the democrats surely cant do anything about it anymore.
His polling seems to be a handful of numbers away from Harris, percentage wise, but isn't he having one gaffe after the other while alienating keys to power?
Men can get pregnant and give birth too, that’s why it’s important to say pregnant people instead of pregnant women. A little bit of care goes a long way.
@@4SteveKombolis clearly not, I’m a leftist who actually has principles, I did not suddenly forget Kamala’s complicity in the genocide when it became fashionable to support her.
@@shaniquajones4448 What was her complicity as VP? And identifying as a man isn't the same as being a man. I'll be glad be the Left can put the fringe crazies in the rear view. You're never happy, you don't understand how politics work or what a VP is responsible for and your outlandish claims that represent maybe 1% of the Left are used to make the rest look nuts.
This isn't the states faults, it's the hospitals faults and that's why these women are filing complaints against the hospitals. If giving an abortion for a tubal pregnancy is legal in the state and the hospital refuses to do that then that is the fault of the hospital, not the law.
@@texasterri2002 - It's hospitals playing politics and not caring one iota about people's lives. There isn't one single state that doesn't have exceptions on abortion for the life of the mother.
Whatever the states decide on abortion so be it. If they decide on full legalization and you are opposed you can decide to leave the state. If a state places limits on abortion and you are opposed you can decide to leave the state. This is what democracy looks like.
@@bugsy9007you have no plausible argument for why a state even needs to have a say in an individuals medical and family planning decisions. Does the state tell us all if it’s ok to do a cartwheel on a Tuesday? No, they don’t. They don’t NEED to have a say, they just WANT to be able to force women to give birth against their will.
No he believe only woman can get pregnant so saying woman/women is the proper use of the english language. Unless you can find me a man who has ovaries.
@kathrynbaker7529 I think they mean stop all together, like a birth strike. I understand if you disagree with that take, but I think you misunderstood what the commenter was attempting to say. Hope this helps.
But no one should be forced to have a child any more than someone should be forced to have an abortion. Also poor women, teenage girls who become pregnant etc. are not incubators for rich women who waited too long to have children and their eggs dried up.
Another idiot that will cry their ass off as soon as it's their daughter, wife or 13yr old mistress. You people are the stupidest wastes of air on the planet.
*"She was initially denied an abortion in Texas inspite of a law making an exception for such emergencies"* - Right, so this and the other instances only occurred due to confusion resulting from the laws being changed and doesnt actually represent a legitimate problem anymore, now that the new laws are firmly in-place.
Wrong, the difficulty is proving the emergency. Right wingers have made it extremely hard to prove this. If the atty general looks at the emergency and believes there was no danger the doctor and mother can be arrested and charged with a felony. There’s fine print with their law.
Well if the woman dies and she should get an abortion to save herself but in places like Texas they won’t do it I wonder if her Life Insurance policy can be paid to the beneficiary or if it would be void?
Jesus you couldn't be more stupid generally if a human is pregnant it's a woman or in republican states any female over 5yrs old that is literally the stupidest thing I've ever heard someone say.
No you imagine men can get pregnant because your all uneducated morons that will literally believe any stupid shit a republican politition says.@@bugsy9007
Ectopic pregnancies are extremely painful and dangerous. Losing the Fallopian tubes is certainly heartbreaking. *However... why is she getting pregnant at the age of 35?* That's a high risk, geriatric pregnancy, waiting to happen. 🙄
It was the doctor's in the 1800s Victorian era that decided that women should have babies as young as possible, without actual research or medical knowledge. New studies show that women are fine to have children through their 30s, that the "risks" are not as scary or common as believed. Men just hate the idea of not having a little girl to order around and bully - men are just weak and afraid of real mature women who won't take their crap.
Because she may have gone to school to be a lawyer , doctor, teachers now are required to have phd. Yeah and finding a decent human to partner with is all kinda crazy. My daughter is 31 and has now changed her mind about having kids. Fertility issues....not judgemental much huh?
Wait did she just say pregnant "people" um that would be a woman, not a freak show. Besides, what about the thing's that identify as a cat, can't they just go to a vet if regular hospitals won't treat them. Afterall, they identify as a cat or dog or snail. WTF is wrong with today's society
Lmao you act like you see this everyday. When was the last time you saw someone pretending to be a cat at the hospital or your drs office? Oh, you haven't?! Where are the constant news reports and videos of the millions and millions of people that are sitting at the hospital doing this?! You're so dramatic.
@@sbffsbrarbrr First off, *people* with XY chromosomes (what you consider men) HAVE gotten pregnant and given birth. Look it up (Swyer syndrome). All that messy biology aside, why in tf would you devolve into emotional hysterics over women being called people? This is the hill you right wing idiots want to die on because you don't view women as fully human.
Til it happens to you and yours..you won't ever understand it because you lack empathy and compassion for those who suffer daily. I hope it never happens to you but your God may judge you for you inhumanity and show you himself. May you be ready for his blessings .
@The young Turks If that woman with etopic pregnancy had taken abortion pill she would have probably ruptured and bleed to death before she could even dial 911. She wouldnt have been diagnosed with a etopic pregnancy and sent home, surgery to remove the pregnancy would have taken place right away!!And why would she need an abortion if the baby was going to die anyway!!!! Y’all vet your stories, and maybe talk with a medical professional with a history of working with this type of situations, pathetic!!!
Methotrexate is not an “abortion drug”. It’s primarily used as a first line treatment for autoimmune disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis. However, because it is a folic acid antagonist it can be used off label to stop an embryo that has implanted outside of the uterus (which is NEVER a viable pregnancy) from growing by preventing cell division after which the woman’s body will the reabsorb the pregnancy. When diagnosed early, methotrexate can resolve an ectopic pregnancy without the need for invasive surgery thereby preserving a woman’s future fertility. I had an ectopic pregnancy nearly 20 years ago that was treated in this way. The ectopic pregnancy was diagnosed via ultrasound when cardiac activity was detected in my fallopian tube. Banning this medication would be detrimental for patients that require it for RA treatment as well as some cancer treatments. In the right circumstances (as determined by a physician), it can also be a very effective treatment for ectopic. I credit the ob-gyn that was on call when my ectopic was diagnosed with preserving my fertility and allowing me to have the child I desperately wanted 2 years after my ectopic. With already compromised fertility, losing my fallopian tube would have meant I’d likely not have been able to conceive. This was one of the most difficult years of my life, but had it happened now, and in a red state, I’d likely not only have lost a fallopian tube, but possibly my life, leaving my older son without a mother. We need better education for everyone (including our nurses apparently), and we need politicians who do not understand and are not educated about the medical complexities and nuances of “abortion” to stop making decisions for women and their doctors. I can’t believe how far we’ve gone backward in the 20 years since my ectopic experience.
@@danielleomvig839 But, it is a very risky gamble, as many women can’t tolerate an ectopic pregnancy past about 3 wks, and if I was working an ER and had a someone present with a complaint of an ectopic pregnancy, depending on her symptoms and how far along she was, I maybe would treat her, or tell her to go back to her OBGYN or whomever made that diagnosis. I’d have questions about it for sure. If she came in with abdominal pain, etc I would order an ultrasound, pregnancy test, etc, because I would need to have confirmation of her diagnosis before I could proceed, but If she just walked into the ER, asymptotic stating she had been diagnosed with a tubal pregnancy, I would probably recommend her see the dr who diagnosed it; or at minimum, want to know why that person didn’t follow through. But with a situation like a tubal pregnancy, it doesn’t matter, medically speaking or even morally, what the abortion laws for that state are or how that particular doctor feels. The fetus is not going to live under any scenario, and if not taken care of swiftly, can cause harm and even death to the mom. My main point was, that this has NOTHING to do with the abortion issue, there are at lest 25-30 variables right now that I can think of off of the top of my head, why a doctor possibly diagnosed this woman’s tubal pregnancy before she came to the ER, and that doctor prob didn’t prescribe the meds that she ask for, because in her situation he didn’t feel it was a safe option, not because he was pro life, that is just ludicrous to even suggest that, and she prob didn’t listen or understand, got emotional instead of using her head, then presents to the ER asking for treatment from one doctor, for a diagnosis that was given by another, in other words, she was asking this doctor to over ride the previous doctors decision, and it doesn’t matter, no doctor esp an ER dr, is gonna do that!
![GUILTY GEAR -STRIVE- Season Pass 4 Playable Character #1 [Queen Dizzy] Trailer](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nXDsAgYXXv4/mqdefault.jpg)
They shouldn't sue the hospitals; they should sue the ones who made this stupid law.
God help us. I'm sorry women. I'll do my part Nov. 5; I promise. Independents for Harris!!!
Good job red state voters. So proud of my “fellow Americans”, treatment in the south. If you are able, leave red states. Also, women in the south, keep voting in these people, this is what happens. Ready to pay attention to politics yet?
This is so shameful. Disgusting
It's an *ectopic* pregnancy. It's not going to come to term - there should be *no* debate here.
I agree. When I see news like this, I'm glad I don't live in the Divided States of Embarrassment. How the hell can the "doctor" scramble to determine what to do (in that case)? Tomorrow there will be a news story about doctors refusing to treat a bullet wound, because the bullet might have a heartbeat
In another century there might be a viable alternative, but with present technology it’s indeed not a live question.
In my opinion denying a woman proper medical care when she presents in the ER with an ectopic pregnancy that's ready to burst is medical malpractice and negligence in the extreme! It is a well-known fact that there is no other option but to remove the ectopic fetus because there is no way that fetus can be viable within a fallopian tube and it is an eminent danger to the life of the mother! It is just appalling that doctors and emergency rooms are turning pregnant women away for fear of being sued or losing their medical license simply because they are doing what they were trained to do .. provide emergency medical treatment! In my opinion those Supreme Court judges that reversed Roe v Wade along with Donald Trump need to be held legally liable for each and every pregnant women that is turned away from the ER and denied medical treatment because of this absolutely insane unacceptable ruling! And in the event that a woman dies because of this barbaric Rule and treatment then they need to be charged with murder or at the very least manslaughter and gross medical practice and negligence!
Blame Abbott and Republican politicians in Texas. They did this….. and some voted for them. Careful what you wish for because it may touch you personally.
Nope it won't
@@OGCHUCK1because women won’t touch you 💅🏻
@@OGCHUCK1 Why not you?
America is so dystopian. I'd be so scared being a woman there
@@byoung8529 Even if youre not afraid of being pregnant, the lack of affordable healthcare is scary for everyone.
@@noigelskram2435 First of all, we don't pay for the healthcare of foreigners. We cover the emergency room, purely life-saving care only. Covering preventative measures would actually be cheaper overall. Secondly, we actually can afford both. Raise taxes on the wealthy and large corporations. Cut spending in other areas. It's a policy choice to focus on corporate subsidies and a bloated defense budget rather than healthcare for our citizens, or even housing for our veterans. If every other developed country (with lower GDPs and a higher number of immigrants per capita) can figure this out, so can we. I refuse to believe that the US is just too stupid to figure out something that EVERY other developed country has managed.
Those women should be given the right to Sue governors and senators
of their states
@stevenwertz8886 Abbott needs to lose EVERYTHING for his monstrous policies. His freedom, his fortune.
@@stevenwertz8886 don't be an idiot
Remember when every single Trump appointed supreme court justice said they wouldn't overturn Roe v. Wade?
Pepperidge farm remembers...
they always say "we wouldn't do that you are crazy" then do the thing they said they wouldn't do
@@DPowered2 Sounds like Democrats to me.
@@sbffsbrarbrr i agree "lets get better healthcare lets, lets tax the rich more, lets make these policies laws so people can keep their rights" then they let republicans charge us and our kids and increase our taxes and still want us to vote for them like they will do anything
*"every single Trump appointed supreme court justice said they wouldn't overturn Roe v. Wade"*
False.
- Barrett stated outright that she thought Roe was wrongly decided, indicating her intent to overturn Roe V Wade, stating that 'it can and should be overruled'.
- Kavanaugh avoided answering whether Roe v. Wade was correctly decided, or how he might rule in a future case challenging that court ruling. Instead, Kavanaugh repeatedly said that Roe v. Wade was 'settled as precedent'.
- Gorsuch said that the Roe decision was 'precedent' but declined to call it 'super precedent' a loosely defined term indicating a deeply rooted, repeatedly upheld precedent. He also declined to give his opinion on whether he thought the court’s ruling was correct.
@@TotalWater-d2o shut your mouth ruclips.net/video/5cjjpaQzwxQ/видео.htmlsi=3PmI8LCS4mA1znmc
I am so sad that this is happening in your country. So very wrong😢
From the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness to the right to death, suffering, and crippling medical debt
At this point if I was a woman of baby bearing age I would get my tubes tied or to have myself sterilized if I were that young.
Good luck getting that done too! Many women can’t have this done without 1) being married and/or have children already or B) being harassed endlessly with comments like “when you’re older, you’ll regret it.” “What about your future husband? Wouldn’t he want kids?” “You don’t know what you want right now.”
All of this has been used to force women into less reproductive freedoms.
It's reeeeaaaalllllyyy difficult to find a doctor who will agree to the procedure if you've never had children before
It's crazy cause Republicans did this why they keep saying that babies are being at after born it's bull
I wonder if you can sue the Supreme Court. I mean, when a group of people lie and screw up theirs job and people are harmed, you have the right to sue right.
Who would preside over the case? 🤔
Moral of the story: don't move to Texas. Stay in California.
@@noigelskram2435 ~155,959 square miles of land & you're only focused on one city, but hey we are doing just fine in San Francisco thank you for asking
A woman and her doctor should be making these calls, not politicians.
And this is why pubs will lose in November.
Pubs will lose because democrat women can’t kill babies?
@@Jabari-q4d if you want a baby so bad you can raise all of the unwanted kids on the streets
@@Jabari-q4d Nobody is killing babies.
@@jaydoubleu3419 that literally makes no sense. If you want illegal immigrants you can house all of them with you
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
@@jaydoubleu3419 how do you get to ‘you have to raise all the children in streets’ from ‘stop ki***ng babies?
You literally make no sense.
Unfortunately that's not necessarily negligence but fear; the fear of losing one's license, the possibility of jail/prison time. This is the government's overreaching action! As a side note, no men were harmed in these cases (to the best of my knowledge). Unfortunately quite a few women and their now unborn fetus' became casualties to a judgement that was most likely heralded by quite a few men!
Every sane person must wonder in bewilderment: wtf in GOD'S name is wrong with these people???
This is what happens when religious zealots and nutjobs get any power.
For any republican that should happen to see this video, is this your idea of freedom? What happened to republicans NOT wanting big government to get in between a person and their doctor? Isn't that what republicans claimed to hate about the ACA(Obamacare)? These horror stories should be forced into the faces of every politician and judge that played a part in these bans. Also I'm surprised there hasn't been a wave of lawsuits for these mishandled abortion complications yet, but I imagine that will come soon enough.
They don't watch the video. They just come in and skip straight to the comments section to repeat the same misinformed BS.
She should sue
She can sue all she wants, she's infertile now.
@@barbthegreat586 yeah, and the ppl responsible for that are still free.
@@barbthegreat586I think she still has one tube so no infertile but definitely she will have a more difficult time 😢
Moral of story if you are of child baring age or have female children move out of states that ban abortion. I have 3 daughters i would move them if need be
This is horrific, can anybody support this? We have returned to the middle ages. Please everyone vote for Dems, not great but a start. Love and Peace to all the women of the world. Shaking the Tree, Peter Gabriel
Where's the DOJ? Shouldn't they help protect women against these unjust and cruel laws?!!
Hijacked by the far right 🤦🏻♀️
Biden has already addressed this, and Texas threw a tantrum. "Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) is suing the Biden administration over federal rules requiring abortions to be provided in medical emergencies to save the life of the mother."
You can’have a heartbeat without a heart. It’s an electric pulse.
Exactly. Embryos don't have hearts.
@@ashleybishop7248 not even embryonic at that point. Zygote.
If I was a medical professional in that situation I would save the mother’s life even if it cost me my career. Because there’s no way I would be able to live with myself for turning a patient away knowing there is a very good chance they will die. Sometimes you have to do the right thing even when your chain of command tells you it’s the wrong thing.
It certainly wouldn't even cost them their career since by law they are absolutely allowed to perform an abortion for a tubal pregnancy.
@@beeforeal5497Then remove all punishment for rendering treatment, including the 99-year sentence.
@@beeforeal5497 As if the "Pro-Life" lawmakers didn't take that law into account. Regardless, those stubborn jackasses wanted to steamroll it anyway.
@@beeforeal5497 Isn't it open to interpretation? You say it's not malpractice, but the state then argues that it is. You'll be held up in court for a long time. Your practice will be restricted if not outright suspended.
No, it isn't open to interpretation when the law specifically makes exceptions for tubal pregnancies. This is nothing but hospital administrations playing politics with patience lives and I hope these women get millions of dollars from the jerk wads who are purposely putting them through torture even though the law is on the side of the women. I don't even blame the doctors. I believe the doctors are being told by higher ups what they can and can't do because administration calls the shots, not doctors, even though most people are completely unaware of that.
Cue some pro life ghoul explaining how these women losing their future fertility is somehow worth it.
They'll say that's what god wanted or something equally as insulting
@@Balletcalvero Then you find the will of god differs markedly depending on how good your medical care is...
That has been happening to African American women since slavery.
@@angepatty who cares
First of all, the responsibility lies with voters who put politicians, who appointed judges, into office. It's strange that such a concern for human life doesn't extend to providing pre/post natal care to ensure healthy mothers and babies or helping families who can't feed their children. Most of all, the same people who are most offended by "abortion" totally ignore the rampant child sex abuse in their own churches.
Their concern for life begins at conception and ends at birth.
Make banning abortion make sense? I understand if people got help to pay for the child and the government had more care for kids, but sense they don't is ridiculous.
They should not complain about the hospials they should take action against them. They have made these woman prospectivly infertile through medical negligence.
When I get healthcare, I know my senator knows best.😮
@@noigelskram2435 How in the FCK did you arrive at that??
@@ashleybishop7248 I'm guessing it's still a mess.
@@Jenifer_R_ Not even. People love their ACA.
@@ashleybishop7248 I wouldn't know. I'm Australian. My healthcare is free.
@@Jenifer_R_ It should be the same here. In the meantime, the ACA has given MILLIONS of people affordable or free healthcare when they previously couldn't afford it.
Sue them for all there worth !!!!!!
I live in Texas. I had about ectopic pregnancy in 2011. I didn't have to go to an emergency room, just my gynecologist because I was having severe pain. She gave me the drug you mentioned.
American healthcare at its best in Canada you do t get denied it’s against the law
Thanks Fran ❤
The of sort thing i see makes so happy I was not born in the USA.
I am GLAD you weren't born in the U.S. either...Please do not live here either...
So start sueing hospitals for malpractice
You've never taken legal action against anybody, have you. lol
It's not that simple.
To hell with that. Sue the piece of crap, hate mongering and corrupt republican lawmakers passing these laws controlling women. Nutcase American taliban weirdo republican lawmakers trying to control women.
You people are so dumb.
This actions taken by the hospitals were legal, in the state of texas.
No malpractice here.
Look up texan woman Katie Cox and her attempt at health care.
So sue hospitals for following the laws that the morons you voted for made....gee that makes sense if you're a moron.
So because abortion is illegal in some states, hospitals refuse to help pregnant women in ERs?? You really need to establish cause and effect because at face value this seems nonsensical
because when they treat them and that treatment technically involves ending the pregnancy to safe the mother's life, they have to make damn sure they can prove that the procedure was indeed necessary and is a legal exception. They know the law exists to punish them for any such procedure, and even if they believe they may be in legal territory with what they're doing, they're risking getting thrown in prison for doing it regardless. You'd need to at least have a lawyer present to even be half sure that just doing your job won't get you locked up. Would you risk that?
Gee, just like the Middle ages. Yeah leave it up to thevery person who is pregnant. Cheers from the Pacific West Coast of Canada.
0:33 pregnant WOMEN...
We get it, you're a fuckhead, just keep it to yourself
What an absolute shame
How can there be a heartbeat if there's no heart formed, no organs...???
A pulse as a bunch of living cells is nowhere near the same !!!
“A bunch of living cells” that have their own unique DNA is what you are. Nobody has ever had any Right to take away your life from you. You are not a tonsil.
Jeremiah 1:5 -google it.
@@hangingby-a-thread A tumor has its own unique DNA - who gaf? A human being is a complete, independent organism consisting of complex organs and organ systems that work together to sustain the whole. A human being has a functioning cerebral cortex that allows thought, feeling, sensation and self awareness. Mindless, insensate, nonviable tissue is NOT a human being regardless of its potential. Claiming it's a person is just stupid.
@@fay5479
It's not even an actual heartbeat because obviously there isn't a heart formed yet. They have equated electric pulses that can only be sensed by the advanced technology of ultrasounds with a beating heart. And while these pulses are generated because of the cellular shit that's happening to create that life, they still don't represent a heartbeat like all living humans have. But the way I see it is if it's in my body, it doesn't have any rights that supercede mine, not until it's capable of surviving outside of my body.
@@christinerodgers1460 totally agree ! While it's dependent on my body, I'm at the wheel.
Even in Africa they don’t treat pregnant wooen like this. Is USA a third world country ??
Yea but for other reasons
It's a sh*thole country.
Then they wonder WHY birthrates are low ...🤣😂🤣😂🤣 LMAO
Pro Life of Suffering
Just send J.D. Vance the bill, doc. Since he is 100% behind Nature “taking its course” in pregnancy. In fact, we’ll remember he said that if he ever has a grossly disabled or suffering child. God forbid. (But honestly, I’m so sorry this happened to you. No doctor I know would do such a thing).
Even if they oppose truly elective abortion, or oppose truly elective surgical abortion after 6, 8, 10, or 12 weeks, they still need to leave it to doctors to decide how to prioritize the woman’s safety, which means allowing medically indicated abortion up to 20 weeks, and then to prioritize live births after 20 weeks. No doctor should be liable criminally of civilly for performing abortion, so long as he had certified that there was a medical need to protect the woman’s safety in terms of an even moderately extraordinary risk. And no woman should be held liable for consenting to an abortion on her doctor’s advice that there is an even moderately extraordinary risk. Imagine the mistrust that conservative legislators must have for doctors that they think they can make a vague one time rule which a random judge can adjudicate the matter after the fact.
Horrific
Bigotry ruins lives.
Cenk is annoying as f when he suddenly says don't scroll. Scroll from 2.00 to 2.15
Idk the specifics of these cases but my medical 2 cents: methotrexate is typically not used if there is fetal cardiac activity because it has a high failure rate. The preferred choice is surgery, a salpingostomy or salpingectomy, which these women ultimately had anyway.
That's not really considered an abortion, but for some odd reason they clarified it as an abortion.
Ending a pregnancy is an ab0rtion.
It is nobody business but the woman, partner and DR should be making these decisions
Kudo's for including anyone else except the women. Some partners and Dr's would say no.
That's not correct. Women do not and have not ever had an absolute right to abortion, the life of the child has always been a consideration ; even Roe v Wade limited the period in which abortions can be obtained to 23 weeks.
@@TotalWater-d2o In these situations it was no life. They weren’t 23 weeks so again it’s nobody business
@@gamefax5741 No man would risk the life of the woman over a fetus that could cause her death. These women lost being able to have a family over something that would’ve never been born. How is that right?
@@NNicholeHE *"In these situations it was no life."*
- There is no legal prohibition on extracting an unborn child that is dead.
- The refusal of medical practitioners to perform the procedure in such instances was most likely due to confusion resulting from the recent legal changes and we would not expect it to occur again now the new laws are firmly in-place.
And the Children dying from incest pregnancies! 😠 😡
I feel so bad for all of the babies being murdered daily. Glad some states have stood up to this evil practice.
@@parkplaceproperties4818Do you ever post anything different?
@@ElizabethGeiger-ye1sfIs that your argument?
@@parkplaceproperties4818 Nobody is murdering babies.
I love RUclips censoring comments. Go RUclips! Don't breathe, you might upset RUclips and the god botherers.
They need to sue the state all they need to see is the add up of lawsuit money to repeal stupid laws😊
That last quote was actually first used by Michael Che on Weekend Update, I believe - except he used a twist at the end. 😅
When right-wingers get their way..
@@noigelskram2435- False, yet again. The right have been trying to suppress abortion rights for decades. Why would they fund something they hate? Common sense, bro, quit lying.
God everyone, nothing but the most divine figure who cares for everyone. Unless of course we are taking the humans, who are telling us what he wants themselves. Religion is nothing but control by those who abuse it for themselves, people who can't accept reality and need anything to have them live in denial and take the easy way out. These actions enable these people who get to pass laws like this.
Nice going republicans you got what you wanted.
When democrats support Islam, what’s Islam’s opinion on abortions? Many abortion clinics in Muslim countries?
@@Jabari-q4d Who cares?
@@DriveInFreak 🤣🤣🤣 you literally followed me down leaving the most ignorant comments possible didn’t you? 😂😂😂
You literally have no arguments at all🤡🤡
@@Jabari-q4d Cry more.
@@DriveInFreak clearly unprincipled fake democrat voters don’t
An ectopic pregnancy can’t in the first place _become_ a fetus (or even an embryo, I think) unless relocated to a proper womb (which might be technological rather than natural). So, using the term in this context is misleading.
An ectopic pregnancy IS a pregnancy. The embryo just isn't implanted where it should be to develop properly and be viable. There is no known medical technique permitting the transfer of the embryo to the uterus, and there is no safe outcome for the mother without medical intervention. The tissu around the ectopic pregnancy often ruptures from week 6 to week 16, with the embryo developing into a fetus around week 9.
F MISSISSIPPI!
A fallopian tube is at most 5 inches long and 0.6 inches in diameter. Does not seem possible that a fetus (10 weeks of pregnancy) would even be viable in the tiny fallopian tube, which means there could not be a heartbeat. Politicians are making rules about a potential being that is nowhere near a viable lifeform at that stage, but the woman could die if the tube ruptures and causes peritonitis
An ectopic pregnancy is never viable as it will eventually rupture the fallopian tube and it cannot be moved or re-implanted in the uterus, but cardiac activity (not quite the same as a heartbeat) can sometimes be detected via ultrasound as early as 6 weeks. That is how my ectopic pregnancy was diagnosed prior to 10 weeks (in my case closer to 7-8 weeks).
Sue ascension health!
When will you learn.
"What Happens To Child Murderers When They Are Denied Access To Hit Job." There, fixed it for you.
You obviously didn't watch the video
You sound like a chomo
What a failure you are @Teddycheong, it's wanted pregnancies ending in rotting babies killing their mothers with sepsis or loss of fertility so they can't start a family at all. You don't go to the hospital for a 17$ pill to end a possible pregnancy chance the morning after, these are real women in crisis, you're the ghouls who will have to answer for having a hand in allowing a woman to die with the dead child she is carrying. If you could get pregnant, and that child began to rot you would be demanding help and we would be right to leave you to suffer the way you gleefully wish others do.
The women in this story aren’t child murderers Teddy Cheong. The women in this story lost their baby because of draconian abortion laws.
@@HappyBanjo-oc3pc ah so you agree women who want abortion that are not in this story are child murderers. We all know, by the way.
Some states will restrict abortions more than others. Whatever your state decides accept it, or decide to leave. It's your choice.
It's a complete non-issue since the Supreme Court placed it in the jurisdiction of the states, not the federal government. All issues on abortion are the domain of the state legislatures.
Why are you repeating the same poorly-supported argument over and over. Keep thinking it’s a non-issue. I dare you. You’ll see.
@@TheJLHThe "democrats" are making an issue out of a non issue by acting like the federal government has some power over "abortion". The Supreme Court explicitly ruled that the states have the power, not the federal government.
Tell the women how much of a non issue this is. heh
@@bugsy9007you’re about to find out how much of an issue it is. So is the Supreme Court.
People made that same argument with slavery. And make no mistake, forcing a woman to carry to term is nothing less than slavery.
People or government should start to percecute these doctors and judges that make these sort of illegal decisions. Like if the state tries to sue people for getting pregancies, government should make sure that everyone who does not go along with the US laws, will be put to jail for a long time, and that this includes doctors, judges and everyone involved in these decisions. I mean here the doctors neglected the patient, medical malpractice, putting her life on risk, caused them enormous emotional damage, caused her not to have kids anymore. I think they need to go to jail for a long time for doing this to anyone, especially since its illegal according to US laws.
But US government or any officials does not seem to care much at all, other than using that stuff against their political opposition, but still not actually doing anything about it. Makes me wonder is DNC is actually even against these southern delusions. Or if they want to keep up the situation and use it as a political tool. Judges making illegal rulings, doctors putting patients life at risk and not following doctoral ethics, causing physical and mental harm to their patients, who they should be healing etc etc. But no one seems to care, except in talk. Biden and DNC could do so much about this right now, but they dont want to. And since it seems like trump has a good chance of winning, well then the democrats surely cant do anything about it anymore.
His polling seems to be a handful of numbers away from Harris, percentage wise, but isn't he having one gaffe after the other while alienating keys to power?
I think TYT meant pregnant people.
BiRtHiNg PeRsOnS yOu BiGoT
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
Men can get pregnant and give birth too, that’s why it’s important to say pregnant people instead of pregnant women. A little bit of care goes a long way.
Is this a joke?
As someone on the Left, please stop posting.. And interesting you are bashing Kamala in other posts.
@@somebody701 trans rights are not a joke, honey. You should get educated before commenting
@@4SteveKombolis clearly not, I’m a leftist who actually has principles, I did not suddenly forget Kamala’s complicity in the genocide when it became fashionable to support her.
@@shaniquajones4448 What was her complicity as VP? And identifying as a man isn't the same as being a man.
I'll be glad be the Left can put the fringe crazies in the rear view. You're never happy, you don't understand how politics work or what a VP is responsible for and your outlandish claims that represent maybe 1% of the Left are used to make the rest look nuts.
Too bad, so sad.
Oh well.
They should of helped them
Believe that final quote was stolen from a Michael Che Joke
😢
I just wanna know who the doctors were - I just want names - I just want to talk.
This isn't the states faults, it's the hospitals faults and that's why these women are filing complaints against the hospitals. If giving an abortion for a tubal pregnancy is legal in the state and the hospital refuses to do that then that is the fault of the hospital, not the law.
shut up
@@waitz001 - Yeah, truth hurts.
In Texas, it's the State!@@beeforeal5497
@@beeforeal5497 it's a technicality, not some great truth; and I have no idea why you're defending Christian Nationalism.
@@texasterri2002 - It's hospitals playing politics and not caring one iota about people's lives. There isn't one single state that doesn't have exceptions on abortion for the life of the mother.
Whatever the states decide on abortion so be it. If they decide on full legalization and you are opposed you can decide to leave the state. If a state places limits on abortion and you are opposed you can decide to leave the state. This is what democracy looks like.
This is a beyond asinine opinion. You think everyone got money to just get the fuck up and move to another state?
@@KCJB22291You're free to go anywhere you'd like. They decided to stay in that state.
Should states be allowed to reinstate slavery? We literally had this "states' rights" bullshit argument 200 years ago. We fought a war over it.
@@bugsy9007 Republicans also want to make it illegal to cross state lines to get an abortion so....
@@bugsy9007you have no plausible argument for why a state even needs to have a say in an individuals medical and family planning decisions. Does the state tell us all if it’s ok to do a cartwheel on a Tuesday? No, they don’t. They don’t NEED to have a say, they just WANT to be able to force women to give birth against their will.
pregnant woman not pregnant people 0:40
Another right winger who believes women aren't fully human.
No he believe only woman can get pregnant so saying woman/women is the proper use of the english language. Unless you can find me a man who has ovaries.
PSA for right wingers: woman are people. Deal with it.
She hates biological women so bad
@@Hugh_Ishe does this on purpose she is a trans stand.
It's not a zygote...
At the end of the day, God will judge these 'leaders'.
God does not exist.
No.
Your psycopathic god dosen't exist.
how about we don't rely on a questionable god, but on the people to judge their leaders. That's what elections are for.
How exactly will a fairytale do that?
Okay I give up; -what?
Solution dont have kids
No more
That's what's going to happen. My friends and I have gotten sterilized!
Ridiculous comment! Thousands of us want children. And how about when rap* and incest happen, as talked about in this video?
@kathrynbaker7529 I think they mean stop all together, like a birth strike. I understand if you disagree with that take, but I think you misunderstood what the commenter was attempting to say. Hope this helps.
@@kaybrown7733Awesome. Let's watch those birth rates decline.
But no one should be forced to have a child any more than someone should be forced to have an abortion. Also poor women, teenage girls who become pregnant etc. are not incubators for rich women who waited too long to have children and their eggs dried up.
There’s no way a doctor denied her knowing it would be life threatening. Unless there’s proof of that I don’t believe it.
Another idiot that will cry their ass off as soon as it's their daughter, wife or 13yr old mistress.
You people are the stupidest wastes of air on the planet.
@@Andrew-tf8jtCouldn't have said it better myself. These people need to have their own country elsewhere!
@@Andrew-tf8jtget triggerd loser😂😂
Its only 100 woman. Big deal. They dont care.
2:33 and this is the butt
*"She was initially denied an abortion in Texas inspite of a law making an exception for such emergencies"*
- Right, so this and the other instances only occurred due to confusion resulting from the laws being changed and doesnt actually represent a legitimate problem anymore, now that the new laws are firmly in-place.
Wrong, the difficulty is proving the emergency. Right wingers have made it extremely hard to prove this. If the atty general looks at the emergency and believes there was no danger the doctor and mother can be arrested and charged with a felony. There’s fine print with their law.
Did you at least stretch before these mental gymnastics to justify what essentially is more yellow tape in regards to health care unnecessarily
Well if the woman dies and she should get an abortion to save herself but in places like Texas they won’t do it I wonder if her Life Insurance policy can be paid to the beneficiary or if it would be void?
They take responsibility and raise a child?
How do we know these are women??
Jesus you couldn't be more stupid generally if a human is pregnant it's a woman or in republican states any female over 5yrs old that is literally the stupidest thing I've ever heard someone say.
@@Andrew-tf8jtWe were told men can get pregnant????
No you imagine men can get pregnant because your all uneducated morons that will literally believe any stupid shit a republican politition says.@@bugsy9007
@@Andrew-tf8jtIt's the "democrats" who say men can get pregnant. Never heard it from a "republican". What gives??
Because....they identify as women. Not complicated.
Not my problem
I'm sure your parents are proud of you! (sarcasm)
Well I would have told you your house was on fire, but hey - you are a 'not my problem' kinda guy.....
CORRECTION: Pregnant "WOMEN" not People you silly Woman! Everyone knows Butt Babies DO NOT Live...
Ah, the problem is they consider women people. I can see where you disagree.
You don't think women are people?
@@Jenifer_R_ Oh no honey...Problem is that the commentator does not understand basic biology.
@@sunshinesun101 I think she understands it more than the men who wrote the laws banning abortion.
@@Jenifer_R_ Highly doubtful. It is apparent that she is willfully ignorant and without any ethics...
Ectopic pregnancies are extremely painful and dangerous. Losing the Fallopian tubes is certainly heartbreaking. *However... why is she getting pregnant at the age of 35?* That's a high risk, geriatric pregnancy, waiting to happen. 🙄
Nah dude, that's not until over 40 and sometimes even older, it's an induvial thing. not some old rule of thumb😅
@@AlexR_44 Jeebus... who wants to be getting a 49 year old pregnant? 😆😅🤣😂 feel sorry for those guys. harharharharharharharharhar
It was the doctor's in the 1800s Victorian era that decided that women should have babies as young as possible, without actual research or medical knowledge. New studies show that women are fine to have children through their 30s, that the "risks" are not as scary or common as believed. Men just hate the idea of not having a little girl to order around and bully - men are just weak and afraid of real mature women who won't take their crap.
so what is a good age to you? You look over 40.
Because she may have gone to school to be a lawyer , doctor, teachers now are required to have phd. Yeah and finding a decent human to partner with is all kinda crazy. My daughter is 31 and has now changed her mind about having kids. Fertility issues....not judgemental much huh?
Don't kill babies 👶
WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
It's a troll. He stalks here every now and again. Just ignore him.
@@seanadams25 abortion
@@straightwhitemale966 Fetuses don’t have feelings
Fetuses are not babies.
Wait did she just say pregnant "people" um that would be a woman, not a freak show.
Besides, what about the thing's that identify as a cat, can't they just go to a vet if regular hospitals won't treat them. Afterall, they identify as a cat or dog or snail.
WTF is wrong with today's society
Is that your honest response to women bleeding out in bathrooms? Just gonna cry about libs and ignore real problems like always?
@@aswfishing4319 Obviously they don't consider women people, so there ya' go.
Lmao you act like you see this everyday. When was the last time you saw someone pretending to be a cat at the hospital or your drs office? Oh, you haven't?! Where are the constant news reports and videos of the millions and millions of people that are sitting at the hospital doing this?!
You're so dramatic.
@@polysom6345 We also haven't seen anyone other than a woman be pregnant so your point is moot.
@@sbffsbrarbrr First off, *people* with XY chromosomes (what you consider men) HAVE gotten pregnant and given birth. Look it up (Swyer syndrome). All that messy biology aside, why in tf would you devolve into emotional hysterics over women being called people? This is the hill you right wing idiots want to die on because you don't view women as fully human.
I always found it strange to call intentionally ending a human life healthcare.
You don't see treatment of an ectopic pregnancy as healthcare? Not getting an abortion could kill the mother. Keep your thinking cap on.
The health of the mother, maybe????
@@glenndesmedt8789 The overwhelming majority of abortions have nothing to do with the health of the mother.
@@waveygravey9347 One hundred percent of abortions have nothing to do with ending a human life.
Til it happens to you and yours..you won't ever understand it because you lack empathy and compassion for those who suffer daily. I hope it never happens to you but your God may judge you for you inhumanity and show you himself. May you be ready for his blessings .
@The young Turks If that woman with etopic pregnancy had taken abortion pill she would have probably ruptured and bleed to death before she could even dial 911. She wouldnt have been diagnosed with a etopic pregnancy and sent home, surgery to remove the pregnancy would have taken place right away!!And why would she need an abortion if the baby was going to die anyway!!!! Y’all vet your stories, and maybe talk with a medical professional with a history of working with this type of situations, pathetic!!!
Methotrexate is not an “abortion drug”. It’s primarily used as a first line treatment for autoimmune disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis. However, because it is a folic acid antagonist it can be used off label to stop an embryo that has implanted outside of the uterus (which is NEVER a viable pregnancy) from growing by preventing cell division after which the woman’s body will the reabsorb the pregnancy. When diagnosed early, methotrexate can resolve an ectopic pregnancy without the need for invasive surgery thereby preserving a woman’s future fertility. I had an ectopic pregnancy nearly 20 years ago that was treated in this way. The ectopic pregnancy was diagnosed via ultrasound when cardiac activity was detected in my fallopian tube. Banning this medication would be detrimental for patients that require it for RA treatment as well as some cancer treatments. In the right circumstances (as determined by a physician), it can also be a very effective treatment for ectopic. I credit the ob-gyn that was on call when my ectopic was diagnosed with preserving my fertility and allowing me to have the child I desperately wanted 2 years after my ectopic. With already compromised fertility, losing my fallopian tube would have meant I’d likely not have been able to conceive. This was one of the most difficult years of my life, but had it happened now, and in a red state, I’d likely not only have lost a fallopian tube, but possibly my life, leaving my older son without a mother. We need better education for everyone (including our nurses apparently), and we need politicians who do not understand and are not educated about the medical complexities and nuances of “abortion” to stop making decisions for women and their doctors. I can’t believe how far we’ve gone backward in the 20 years since my ectopic experience.
@@danielleomvig839 But, it is a very risky gamble, as many women can’t tolerate an ectopic pregnancy past about 3 wks, and if I was working an ER and had a someone present with a complaint of an ectopic pregnancy, depending on her symptoms and how far along she was, I maybe would treat her, or tell her to go back to her OBGYN or whomever made that diagnosis. I’d have questions about it for sure. If she came in with abdominal pain, etc I would order an ultrasound, pregnancy test, etc, because I would need to have confirmation of her diagnosis before I could proceed, but If she just walked into the ER, asymptotic stating she had been diagnosed with a tubal pregnancy, I would probably recommend her see the dr who diagnosed it; or at minimum, want to know why that person didn’t follow through. But with a situation like a tubal pregnancy, it doesn’t matter, medically speaking or even morally, what the abortion laws for that state are or how that particular doctor feels. The fetus is not going to live under any scenario, and if not taken care of swiftly, can cause harm and even death to the mom. My main point was, that this has NOTHING to do with the abortion issue, there are at lest 25-30 variables right now that I can think of off of the top of my head, why a doctor possibly diagnosed this woman’s tubal pregnancy before she came to the ER, and that doctor prob didn’t prescribe the meds that she ask for, because in her situation he didn’t feel it was a safe option, not because he was pro life, that is just ludicrous to even suggest that, and she prob didn’t listen or understand, got emotional instead of using her head, then presents to the ER asking for treatment from one doctor, for a diagnosis that was given by another, in other words, she was asking this doctor to over ride the previous doctors decision, and it doesn’t matter, no doctor esp an ER dr, is gonna do that!
“Pregnant People”, lol, I’m gonna stop listening now.
Definitely a weirdo republican then.
Good idea if you are easily upset
Okay, snowflake.
Oh, so you do not think that women are people.
Duly noted.
@@DriveInFreak
Can men get pregnant? No. So saying “Pregnant People” is just virtue-signaling nonsense, and sounds forced as hell.
Don't Murder Your Children.
YOUR MOM SHOULD HAVE HAD AN ABORTION
Like God does in the bible you mean?
Don't rape 5 year old girls or force them to marry 50 year old rapist pedophiles, then. Ban all child marriage up to age 18 and above.
Fetuses don’t have feelings and it’s not anyone’s responsibility to give birth.
Fetuses are not children.
This is the sacrifice we have to make for our freedom and liberty.