Also, for everyone who seems to want a lower price for the new plane, the engine manufacturer charges about $820,000.00 for the engine, plus that same manufacturer will charge you about $200,000 to $500,000 when it's time for an inspection. And nobody else is authorized/certified to inspect or repair this engine. Same as for the vision jet on this issue.
There There, now unless you won the powerball or something, forget jetting, just inspection costs a million . I can buy a lot of first class tickets for that money and lot safer too. If they want to sell it they should make it free or sell it like apple care !
This is the most exciting Pvt JET in recent times would love to own and fly it also would love to see a stretched version with a step up in engine boost to achieve the 520 MPH CRUISE SPEED WOW😮 BEAUTIFULL AIRCRAFT INDEED 😊
@@rfresh1011 Because it can take awhile to get take off clearance in rush hour at large airports like DIA. Listen to some ATC tapes for the phrase "Line up and wait, you are number 9 in line for departure". If you are 9th in line, it will probably be at least 18 minutes before you can take off.
@@msnpassjan2004 I see. Your correct and you're assuming everyone else would be flying commercial. I'm a commercial rated pilot and business jet instructor. I know all about line up and wait, etc. I was coming from the point of view that others could take a private aircraft too and not have to wait, but now that you've clarified your statement I understand where you're coming from. You know, I don't what it is, but I'm OK with flying a single engine turbo-prop, but I'm not ok flying a single engine jet powered aircraft. I guess it must be that in all the years I've been training business jet pilots, we do so much single engine flying in training, shutting down an engine, etc. Mostly in two engine biz jets and some three engine jets.
Good job! Very detailed. I would however, liked to have seen inside the jet -controls, instruments, seating, entertainment (if applicable), storage et al. I've subbed, and I look forward to your next vid. ✌️😎
Great Presentation a very impressive JET AIRCRAFT FAST GOOD LOOKING VERY ADEQUATE RANGE AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST FABULOUS ECONOMY WITH A BASE PRICE THATS ATTAINABLE. WIN WIN AIRCRAFT HANDS DOWN !!! ✋️ one curious question ? Does it have a emergency Parachute ? 😕
I heard of it a couple of years ago. I think it's exceptional. I hope it makes it. The short takeoff and landing really make it safe. I would like to know how many hours the prototypes have on them. Thanks!
It is smaller than Cirrus SF 50. But it is faster and has a better range. Of course for the time being it is experimental. Pros It is like Piper cub of jets with STOL abilities. Low cost of maintainence. Also it is a great option for the military as a recon plane because of the ability to land on grass strips. Cons My major concern is the low service ceiling.May have to deviate course in bad weather. ** Guys I know some of you have concerns because it is from Poland. It is not US ,French ,German or Swiss. But the Russian T34 was a better tank than the German tiger tank. Embraer is Brazilian. Great things may come from humble beginnings. Good job .well done Poland.
Thanks for this excellent video! I APPRECIATE IT WHEN YOU CONVERT KILOMETERS TO MILES AND KILOGRAMS TO POUNDS....That puts things in the proper perspective....
I don't know. Still loving the Used Honda Jet. Only $2 Million used and it is Comfortable. They are also looking at adding the Safe Return in the Honda Jets. That will be Awesome.
The Vision has just the single engine. Making it more cost effective per hour of fuel. Also the yearly engine annual is half the price along with any motor repairs that can come along. I believe the onboard emergency parachute system, does add to the pilots keen peace of mind. Also you can add two lite wing mounts, to hang AIM-9 Sidewinder anti-aircraft missiles underneath. The Engineers left enough Room up front for a single M3 Browning machine gun with electrically-boosted feed in the nose areas.
just a thought!!! the ultra compact Flaris LAR01 would do great as a feather weight multi role fighter!!! the LAR01 can serve an EW aircraft for the navy, similar to the carrier borne EA-18J Growler (Block III) multi role EW fighter!!! which by the way is very expensive!!! the LARS01 has to be equipped with under wing hard points!!!
Of course I love this plane as I am from Poland but a much bigger and more comfortable Cirrus Vision Jet costs much less than this relatively small aircraft. To make it a market bestseller, they need to make its price by far more reasonable... I wish tem all the best but not at this price
It’s PSID (pressurization differential pressure) is far higher than the PC-12. The PC-12 can’t do much about that since that is designed into its structure. The Denali service ceiling is FL310. Higher than the PC-12. As far as pressurization and service ceiling goes, the Denali walks all over the PC-12.
@@johnf3305 Don't get me wrong, I DO like the PC-12. I'm just saying it was designed a long time ago and you can't change it's pressurization design now, so they don't have a lot of wiggle room (if any) to up it's service ceiling. I LOVE their new PT-6 E engine. I don't know why Cessna didn't go with a PT-6. Developing a new engine for the Denali wasn't at all necessary. Just a massive waste of certification money.
@@rfresh1011 In this video it says the service ceiling is 25,000 ft but in wikipedia it says 46,000 ft. Can anyone verify this? Actually most of the stats in this video don't match what's on wikipedia. The Cirrus Vision Jet which is very similar has a service ceiling of 28,000 ft and Eclipse has a service ceiling of 41,000 ft which is why I claimed that the s.c. for LAR01 is too low.
Does it come with a weather radar? The ground roll on takeoff and landing is really what makes this aircraft stand out... only shadowed by its design... I mean, it's exotic to say the least
because they came from the Imperial Rome system of measurements.. Roman numerals have ==>> no zero.. and require fractions to get any type of accuracy.. it's not accurate at all.. the metric system is based on the real World.. 10 million meters between the equator and pole.. for example.. I can do powers of 10 in my head.. try that with fractions.. that's exactly why most Americans tell me they think math is hard Romans could not do simple trigonometry.. go figure
it's absolutely impossible to do mathematics with no zero... that's the very best reason to convert to metric... I lived in Europe for a few years when I was a kid... I have always used metric.. I am a scientist, and it is the only system we use.. for all of the above reasons.. and lots more.. Imperial system measurements are absolutely arbitrary ... they have no rhyme or reason.. 100 is too hot.. 0 is too cold for a guy in Germany in the 1700s.. or something like that.. or.. 0 is the freezing point of water.. 100 is the boiling point... a mile was 10,000 steps for a Roman soldier... or something like that.. probably not a whole increment of 10.. because they don't use zero, 10 was just a symbol.. with no value or connection to 20.. or 15... it's arbitrary.. and it makes mathematics impossible, and science too.. it keeps the Americans from figuring out where all the money goes
Ronald Ray Gun thought the kiddies would be confused by learning 2 systems of measurements.. why we would continue to use Imperial system measurements is .. not, probably, the real reason.. not figuring out where the money goes probably is.. it was one of his last acts as president.. as he slipped into Alzheimer's dementia... crazy like a fox
Very nice aircraft! but too small, no anti ice or deice system, the price is close to the Vision Cirrus jet....it should cost less than 1.5 to be competitive(sure! also equipped with a valid icing removal) anyway i hope all the best for this lovely bird. Good luck!!!
This is weird to compare to the cirrus price wise. So the cirrus price is just under 2mil whist this is about 450k more expensive right off the bat. So from price the cirrus is winning here, however the LAR01 cost about $180 less an hour to operate than the cirrus. This means you’ll have to fly it for 2500 hours just to break even. Now that’s all cool but if the LAR01 is more expensive to maintain especially after that many hours then you’ll never make your money back in the purchase. The other thing is that the cirrus can hold two more passengers which is a third more than the LAR01 but only cost a quarter more to operate an hour. This means if you’re running some type of business where the more people you can have the better you will be making about 5% more with the cirrus. The draw back is that the cirrus travel well over a 100knots slower at cruise speed so in a sense the farther you can go the more cost affective the LAR01 is. They expect about 2000 miles of rang with is about 800 larger than the cirrus. The only issue is that for a jet of that size with only four other seats to fly someone that far there is always a lost. So unlike the cirrus where there can be six passengers going somewhere the LAR01 can only carry 4 at most which will affect its range a lot. The issue is that it might not be as expensive to fly the aircraft an hour but maintenance and trying to make back that money will have the company up charge for a little while. The issue with this is that anyone who is able to pay that much will have more than three associates with them. The other issue is that the cirrus is cheaper and has a way more better equipped interior that even has a tv in it and is quiet enough to not have to wear ear protection. The LAR01 does not. What I’m saying is that this aircraft is more expensive and would require the owner to fly it a lot to make back as much money as they spent on it. The jet is not practical for a company to own and operate so it’ll be exactly what it’s meant for and that’s a personal private jet. The issue is that why would you buy a jet that is half a million more with less luxury and capability when it comes to carry weight? In order to break even the owner would have to spend well over another million on fuel alone just to break even with a cirrus that flew the same 2500 hours. That’s impractical and if I’m being honest sort of ruins the plane. If the plane was just as much as the cirrus then maybe it would be worth it but it’s not. I just checked their website and the price was lowered to about the same as the cirrus and now it’s more of a question of the mission of the aircraft. Would you rather have practicality or performance?
If the reported specs are true, and not BS, then this seems to be the only jet that will work with my 2,000 foot runway. I like it, but if there is no news soon, and it's not available to buy soon, then I'm buying something else.
Cirrus jet has so many features that this jet lacks. price should be 1 mil. even at 1 mil you will not get many takers. Heck, a used Eclipse jet is a better bargain.
totally agree.This Flaris not really attractive. the space inside seems small, the center stick its a no go to me, and yes the price should be so much less. for $2,3M, this plane will not find many takers.. The vision jet G2 full option, which is a AMAZING jet, cost $400,000 more than this Flaris.. so the choice is made I think.
Also if the CELERA 500L can actually perform anything like they claim, that should be another competitor out classing them on features with similar performance, but should have with lower operating costs (who knows on purchase price). Granted it still seems hard to believe they really will cut fuel costs nearly an order of magnitude.
It has many good qualities, I believe the car seat jet config has extreme potential but other than looking a little funky, where it fails is price. I don't care that it might still make cost sense compared to other products, it's still a big failure compared to what it could be. Williams may be a big part of the fault, depending on what they charge for such an engine. What could and should be done instead is developing a tiny turbofan jet engine such that an ultra light 4 seater would be well powered by 2 such engines. It would be engines in the 10-20kg range which can tell you that they shouldn't cost half a million dollars. An ultralight pressurized twin jet has extreme potential. Over 2 million euros is a complete failure. you can buy 2 used twin engine jets for that.
"An ultralight pressurized twin jet has extreme potential" I'm not certain if I agree with that or I understand what you're trying to say. Is it an ultralight? While U.S. and rest of the world ultralight categories are very different, both limit the flight envelope so much that pressurization or jet propulsion should be unnecessary. Is it a CS23 plane with the weight of an ultralight? Then I'm not certain you can include all those extra equipment needed and retain the weight of an ultralight... Or did I misunderstand it?
@@g.zoltan You are so rooted in what exists you have trouble imagining something new. If it had to conform to current regulations yes it would be C23/part 23 and key to the idea is low weight. What extra equipment? remember a 200kg aircraft would only need very very light jet engines, especially when it has two. And pressurization in a small hull is zero challenge for composites. Indeed it's a strength, windows aside. when you go small and light, things become effortless. Material strengths becomes advantageous at small scales. Which is important for a jet engine.
@@reinhart482 Yes, that door design is just looking for an accident!! Very bad design. However, at $1.5M they might just sell a lot of them. The avionics are not bad for the price. I'd like to have seen a G3000 in it with the new autoland feature if the pilot cannot land the airplane but those all add to the cost. $1.5M just might be their ticket to success!! The other thing I like about that single engine is it farther back behind the cabin than the Cirrus Jet. That has to help cut down on the engine noise getting into the cabin.
See the only thing i see the same as the cirrus vicion jet is the single engine. Other wise this is an entirety different aircraft, longer range, longer aircraft, cirrus has a V tail while the flari has a twin tail (which makes it more controllable in cross winds) there are a lot of technical and design differences.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
Beautiful aircraft! Haven't seen one yet, this was the first time. You have a winner here!!
Very short take off and landing. Amazing!
I will buy one
Wow 😲👌🏾 I love it thanks for the presentation 🇿🇦
You’re welcome!
Piękny samolot i na pewno też pięknie lata...
Impressive specs and a most beautiful design. 🙌🙌🙌
play at 1.25 speed and the audio almost sounds normal
But even more robotic. One of the better ones, but I think it's a bot.
I watch everything at 2 speed.
Looks pretty/organic. Not a bad looking plane.
Wow.... nice aircraft thanks again
It is! Thanks for watching
Wow!🎉Beauty, class economy🛫power... congrats👍Poland!
Also, for everyone who seems to want a lower price for the new plane, the engine manufacturer charges about $820,000.00 for the engine, plus that same manufacturer will charge you about $200,000 to $500,000 when it's time for an inspection. And nobody else is authorized/certified to inspect or repair this engine. Same as for the vision jet on this issue.
thanks a lot
There There, now unless you won the powerball or something, forget jetting, just inspection costs a million . I can buy a lot of first class tickets for that money and lot safer too. If they want to sell it they should make it free or sell it like apple care !
@@zendoc49 😂😂😂😂
It looks like a modern version of the Heinkel HE-162
Hummingbirds look like sunbirds. Not related. At all.
VolksJäger! A Jet for das Volk!
Exactly my thought !
This is the most exciting Pvt JET in recent times would love to own and fly it also would love to see a stretched version with a step up in engine boost to achieve the 520 MPH CRUISE SPEED WOW😮 BEAUTIFULL AIRCRAFT INDEED 😊
Great plane, very impressive and step above.
nice video , thanks for sharing , great ideas
Wow,I could get from Boulder,Colorado to Chicago while everyone else was still on the ground at DIA in Denver. That would be cool.
Lol
Take Green Ride Boulder to the airport. They are a great shuttle service.
Why is everyone else on the ground? Their are many other airplanes around. Your statement makes no sense.
@@rfresh1011 Because it can take awhile to get take off clearance in rush hour at large airports like DIA. Listen to some ATC tapes for the phrase "Line up and wait, you are number 9 in line for departure". If you are 9th in line, it will probably be at least 18 minutes before you can take off.
@@msnpassjan2004 I see. Your correct and you're assuming everyone else would be flying commercial. I'm a commercial rated pilot and business jet instructor. I know all about line up and wait, etc. I was coming from the point of view that others could take a private aircraft too and not have to wait, but now that you've clarified your statement I understand where you're coming from.
You know, I don't what it is, but I'm OK with flying a single engine turbo-prop, but I'm not ok flying a single engine jet powered aircraft. I guess it must be that in all the years I've been training business jet pilots, we do so much single engine flying in training, shutting down an engine, etc. Mostly in two engine biz jets and some three engine jets.
очень красивый самолет. даешь конкуренцию Cirrus-у
Good job! Very detailed.
I would however, liked to have seen inside the jet -controls, instruments, seating, entertainment (if applicable), storage et al.
I've subbed, and I look forward to your next vid. ✌️😎
This would make a good A-10 "light" with a
.22 lr rotarygun in the nose, 👍
Great Presentation a very impressive JET AIRCRAFT FAST GOOD LOOKING VERY ADEQUATE RANGE AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST FABULOUS ECONOMY WITH A BASE PRICE THATS ATTAINABLE. WIN WIN
AIRCRAFT HANDS DOWN !!! ✋️ one curious question ? Does it have a emergency Parachute ? 😕
Very cool! I would love to fly it!
I heard of it a couple of years ago. I think it's exceptional. I hope it makes it. The short takeoff and landing really make it safe. I would like to know how many hours the prototypes have on them. Thanks!
Landing on grass with this thing seems like an amazing feat.
Definitely room in the market for a more minimalist Cirrus vision jet.
Extremely Interesting.
It will be limited unless it is available with anti-ice systems.
It has an anti ice system...
No anti-ice is visible on the prototype or listed in the specs.
@@markm6853 yeah, you’re right...where did I get the idea it had anti-ice?
@@rfresh1011 At the paris airshow they explained an electric anti ice system. It is reported in a number of articles.
It is smaller than Cirrus SF 50.
But it is faster and has a better range.
Of course for the time being it is experimental.
Pros
It is like Piper cub of jets with STOL abilities.
Low cost of maintainence.
Also it is a great option for the military as a recon plane because of the ability to land on grass strips.
Cons
My major concern is the low service ceiling.May have to deviate course in bad weather.
** Guys I know some of you have concerns because it is from Poland.
It is not US ,French ,German or Swiss.
But the Russian T34 was a better tank than the German tiger tank.
Embraer is Brazilian.
Great things may come from humble beginnings.
Good job .well done Poland.
Tbh, most europeans rather have “made in Poland” written on their stuff because “made in Germany” actually means made in China.
Thanks for this excellent video! I APPRECIATE IT WHEN YOU CONVERT KILOMETERS TO MILES AND KILOGRAMS TO POUNDS....That puts things in the proper perspective....
Glad you enjoyed and I agree!
Hahaha the americans...
Not the propers, just yours ;)
@@vincent5 Stay Anonymous FH.
@@vincent5 💯
Really Nice.
Amazing small personal Jet. Are they already taking orders for Flaris lar 1?
Finally something from Poland
I'll take two !!
Does it come with lavatory?
I don't know. Still loving the Used Honda Jet. Only $2 Million used and it is Comfortable. They are also looking at adding the Safe Return in the Honda Jets. That will be Awesome.
Yeah the HondaJet is really neat!
The Vision has just the single engine. Making it more cost effective per hour of fuel. Also the yearly engine annual is half the price along with any motor repairs that can come along. I believe the onboard emergency parachute system, does add to the pilots keen peace of mind. Also you can add two lite wing mounts, to hang AIM-9 Sidewinder anti-aircraft missiles underneath. The Engineers left enough Room up front for a single M3 Browning machine gun with electrically-boosted feed in the nose areas.
I was inside a Honda jet last weekend. Very claustrophobic feeling inside. I didn’t like it at all. But outside it’s a good size jet.
@@rfresh1011 I didn't have that feeling. Yet all have different preferences.
@@rfresh1011 How would it be for a 6'4" 256 lb pilot?
Is there a ballistic parachute?
I like it.
just a thought!!! the ultra compact Flaris LAR01 would do great as a feather weight multi role fighter!!! the LAR01 can serve an EW aircraft for the navy, similar to the carrier borne EA-18J Growler (Block III) multi role EW fighter!!! which by the way is very expensive!!! the LARS01 has to be equipped with under wing hard points!!!
The is a beautiful plane!
Of course I love this plane as I am from Poland but a much bigger and more comfortable Cirrus Vision Jet costs much less than this relatively small aircraft. To make it a market bestseller, they need to make its price by far more reasonable... I wish tem all the best but not at this price
I would love to see a jet variant of the tiny Sea Bee fling boat.
The service ceiling is very low but the other stats look good.
It’s PSID (pressurization differential pressure) is far higher than the PC-12. The PC-12 can’t do much about that since that is designed into its structure. The Denali service ceiling is FL310. Higher than the PC-12. As far as pressurization and service ceiling goes, the Denali walks all over the PC-12.
@@rfresh1011 PC-12...1,700 sold...Denali...0
@@johnf3305 Don't get me wrong, I DO like the PC-12. I'm just saying it was designed a long time ago and you can't change it's pressurization design now, so they don't have a lot of wiggle room (if any) to up it's service ceiling. I LOVE their new PT-6 E engine. I don't know why Cessna didn't go with a PT-6. Developing a new engine for the Denali wasn't at all necessary. Just a massive waste of certification money.
@@rfresh1011 In this video it says the service ceiling is 25,000 ft but in wikipedia it says 46,000 ft. Can anyone verify this? Actually most of the stats in this video don't match what's on wikipedia. The Cirrus Vision Jet which is very similar has a service ceiling of 28,000 ft and Eclipse has a service ceiling of 41,000 ft which is why I claimed that the s.c. for LAR01 is too low.
@@justaninja1 Their website says the service ceiling is 25000 feet.
She's a beauty!!!
celera 500 is doing 480 miles per hour and 4500 nauthical miles range consuption is around 18 - 25 miles to the gallon.
Doesn't it have an emergency parachute system?
Yes it does
Very cool 😎
How does this compare to the SF50. It seems like it’s a direct competitor in price to the SF50
For this price it should go above the weather
it can do 45000; that is way above the weather
Reminds me of the WW2 Heinkel HE162 jet that the Luftwaffe produced in the later 1940,s?
Wow
It’s a Heinkel He 162
whoa ! a real beauty !!!!!!
Price?
How does it compare with the Eclipse?
5:37 The first crash of this aircraft on a beach...?
Is it pressurized?
Any plans for an unmanned or optionally-manned version, I wonder? It looks like it'd lend itself well to an ISR role.
What will the wait time be? How much time, in years, for one to be delivered?
How about the payload with full fuel.
Impressive specs. FAA IFR certified? FIKI?
Absolutely love this.
How does such a lightweight jet behave at speeds over 700km/h? Would it not be very uncomfortable even with small turbulence?
It would be like if Godzilla hurled it down from a mountaintop lol 😂
Nice presentation. What about maintenance and parts? How expensive would those be?
What about the door configuration though doesn’t look safe
But does it fly?
Does it come with a weather radar?
The ground roll on takeoff and landing is really what makes this aircraft stand out... only shadowed by its design... I mean, it's exotic to say the least
comes with whatever you want to spend your money on
@@stevemyers2092 that is not how the aviation industry works…
Why not show the specs of both the smaller versions you mentioned in this video.
VERY IMPRESSIVE
Rewelacja!
Will like the twine engine version
What will you need a second mill for, George...?
What serious aviator uses Kilometers or Miles per hour? We use knots!
The Cessna 177 Cardinal measures airspeed in mph...just saying.
I was flying in a plane which had km/h on a gauge so ...
because they came from the Imperial Rome system of measurements.. Roman numerals have ==>> no zero.. and require fractions to get any type of accuracy.. it's not accurate at all.. the metric system is based on the real World.. 10 million meters between the equator and pole.. for example.. I can do powers of 10 in my head.. try that with fractions.. that's exactly why most Americans tell me they think math is hard
Romans could not do simple trigonometry.. go figure
it's absolutely impossible to do mathematics with no zero... that's the very best reason to convert to metric... I lived in Europe for a few years when I was a kid... I have always used metric.. I am a scientist, and it is the only system we use.. for all of the above reasons.. and lots more.. Imperial system measurements are absolutely arbitrary
... they have no rhyme or reason.. 100 is too hot.. 0 is too cold for a guy in Germany in the 1700s.. or something like that.. or.. 0 is the freezing point of water.. 100 is the boiling point... a mile was 10,000 steps for a Roman soldier... or something like that.. probably not a whole increment of 10.. because they don't use zero, 10 was just a symbol.. with no value or connection to 20.. or 15... it's arbitrary.. and it makes mathematics impossible, and science too.. it keeps the Americans from figuring out where all the money goes
Ronald Ray Gun thought the kiddies would be confused by learning 2 systems of measurements.. why we would continue to use Imperial system measurements is .. not, probably, the real reason.. not figuring out where the money goes probably is.. it was one of his last acts as president.. as he slipped into Alzheimer's dementia... crazy like a fox
Very nice aircraft! but too small, no anti ice or deice system, the price is close to the Vision Cirrus jet....it should cost less than 1.5 to be competitive(sure! also equipped with a valid icing removal) anyway i hope all the best for this lovely bird.
Good luck!!!
if all numbers come in as stated (maybe cheaper) it would have me interested
the price was 1 million not 2 .... Top plane in he's category. i want it
is the interior airtight?
I love it!
This is weird to compare to the cirrus price wise. So the cirrus price is just under 2mil whist this is about 450k more expensive right off the bat. So from price the cirrus is winning here, however the LAR01 cost about $180 less an hour to operate than the cirrus. This means you’ll have to fly it for 2500 hours just to break even. Now that’s all cool but if the LAR01 is more expensive to maintain especially after that many hours then you’ll never make your money back in the purchase. The other thing is that the cirrus can hold two more passengers which is a third more than the LAR01 but only cost a quarter more to operate an hour. This means if you’re running some type of business where the more people you can have the better you will be making about 5% more with the cirrus. The draw back is that the cirrus travel well over a 100knots slower at cruise speed so in a sense the farther you can go the more cost affective the LAR01 is. They expect about 2000 miles of rang with is about 800 larger than the cirrus. The only issue is that for a jet of that size with only four other seats to fly someone that far there is always a lost. So unlike the cirrus where there can be six passengers going somewhere the LAR01 can only carry 4 at most which will affect its range a lot. The issue is that it might not be as expensive to fly the aircraft an hour but maintenance and trying to make back that money will have the company up charge for a little while. The issue with this is that anyone who is able to pay that much will have more than three associates with them. The other issue is that the cirrus is cheaper and has a way more better equipped interior that even has a tv in it and is quiet enough to not have to wear ear protection. The LAR01 does not. What I’m saying is that this aircraft is more expensive and would require the owner to fly it a lot to make back as much money as they spent on it. The jet is not practical for a company to own and operate so it’ll be exactly what it’s meant for and that’s a personal private jet. The issue is that why would you buy a jet that is half a million more with less luxury and capability when it comes to carry weight? In order to break even the owner would have to spend well over another million on fuel alone just to break even with a cirrus that flew the same 2500 hours. That’s impractical and if I’m being honest sort of ruins the plane. If the plane was just as much as the cirrus then maybe it would be worth it but it’s not. I just checked their website and the price was lowered to about the same as the cirrus and now it’s more of a question of the mission of the aircraft. Would you rather have practicality or performance?
Well you really didn’t show the interior at all!
If the reported specs are true, and not BS, then this seems to be the only jet that will work with my 2,000 foot runway. I like it, but if there is no news soon, and it's not available to buy soon, then I'm buying something else.
From the front it looks like that electric razor that sang "How dry I am" on that old cartoon.
I want one.
Cirrus jet has so many features that this jet lacks. price should be 1 mil. even at 1 mil you will not get many takers. Heck, a used Eclipse jet is a better bargain.
totally agree.This Flaris not really attractive. the space inside seems small, the center stick its a no go to me, and yes the price should be so much less. for $2,3M, this plane will not find many takers.. The vision jet G2 full option, which is a AMAZING jet, cost $400,000 more than this Flaris.. so the choice is made I think.
Also if the CELERA 500L can actually perform anything like they claim, that should be another competitor out classing them on features with similar performance, but should have with lower operating costs (who knows on purchase price). Granted it still seems hard to believe they really will cut fuel costs nearly an order of magnitude.
Price no high ?
Wow, Short Take off roll!
This is a beautiful airplane waw I which I can own one.
It has many good qualities, I believe the car seat jet config has extreme potential but other than looking a little funky, where it fails is price. I don't care that it might still make cost sense compared to other products, it's still a big failure compared to what it could be. Williams may be a big part of the fault, depending on what they charge for such an engine.
What could and should be done instead is developing a tiny turbofan jet engine such that an ultra light 4 seater would be well powered by 2 such engines. It would be engines in the 10-20kg range which can tell you that they shouldn't cost half a million dollars. An ultralight pressurized twin jet has extreme potential. Over 2 million euros is a complete failure. you can buy 2 used twin engine jets for that.
2 million euros definitely is a high price
Couldn't agree more!
"An ultralight pressurized twin jet has extreme potential"
I'm not certain if I agree with that or I understand what you're trying to say.
Is it an ultralight? While U.S. and rest of the world ultralight categories are very different, both limit the flight envelope so much that pressurization or jet propulsion should be unnecessary.
Is it a CS23 plane with the weight of an ultralight? Then I'm not certain you can include all those extra equipment needed and retain the weight of an ultralight...
Or did I misunderstand it?
@@g.zoltan You are so rooted in what exists you have trouble imagining something new. If it had to conform to current regulations yes it would be C23/part 23 and key to the idea is low weight. What extra equipment? remember a 200kg aircraft would only need very very light jet engines, especially when it has two. And pressurization in a small hull is zero challenge for composites. Indeed it's a strength, windows aside. when you go small and light, things become effortless. Material strengths becomes advantageous at small scales. Which is important for a jet engine.
@@DanFrederiksen So you're thinking of a Subsonex JSX-2T?
I may be old fashioned, but I find it difficult to watch aviation reviews when speeds are not referred to in knots.
No offense but I’m not a dog I’m not worried about knots
How can it be that much faster than the Cirrus SF 50? 477mph? GS with 100 knt tailwind at FL250?
That door sure puts the suicide in suicide door. Can you imagine that thing popping open on take off ?
On takeoff is where I’d want a door malfunction to happen...not at cruise altitudes.
Yes bad door design idea. Door and hatch malfunctions are not uncommon. Fatal Crashes have occurred due to them
@@reinhart482 Yes, that door design is just looking for an accident!! Very bad design. However, at $1.5M they might just sell a lot of them. The avionics are not bad for the price. I'd like to have seen a G3000 in it with the new autoland feature if the pilot cannot land the airplane but those all add to the cost. $1.5M just might be their ticket to success!! The other thing I like about that single engine is it farther back behind the cabin than the Cirrus Jet. That has to help cut down on the engine noise getting into the cabin.
Bloody good airbrake though!🧱
Deadly doors. Can you imagine getting into an argument with the wife at 35,000 feet and she said she was getting out and walking.
That's a feature
It has a ceiling of 25,000 ft and it's pressurized. That door isn't opening.
great plane to ship m3th n kokaina around
😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
I like!!!!!!! Just don’t have the money. 😭
Lol
There are companies that will loan money for this particular aircraft because it's bankable.
Really small cabin for the cost! The Eclipse 550 is still my favorite, larger cabin, almost same speed.
lol normal, your jet is 50% more expensive xD
and flaris got 1000km more range! :D
There’s a reason why the Eclipse has terrible depreciation. I would rather a PC12. I don’t know one pilot who wouldn’t.
and 2 engine safety - BIG SAFETY difference.
I wouldn't mind the eclipse given the economy and safety except tgat the company is bankrupt. Yes, serial bankrupters the plane is cursed.
C'mon Cirrus. Step up your game. The vision jet is pretty, but the TBM 930 out performs it in every aspect.
why miles, not knots?
Advertising gimmick, mph appears faster than knots.
Wow!!! Only the price ?
Looks like there may be a few tailstrikes with this airplane
It’s just as low as a piper warrior.
Bro this Aircraft is cirrus vision jet upgrade version
Lol
it has an OV-1 Mohawk vibe to it
Promising solution for easy & fast movement, but price two times too high !
LOL
A cirrus SR22 is 1.2 million... you're the most delusional I've ever seen here
See the only thing i see the same as the cirrus vicion jet is the single engine. Other wise this is an entirety different aircraft, longer range, longer aircraft, cirrus has a V tail while the flari has a twin tail (which makes it more controllable in cross winds) there are a lot of technical and design differences.