Lady Michele Renouf and Norman Finkelstein discuss the 2006 Tehran Holocaust Conference
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 окт 2024
- Appearing on Sahar TV's Forum program in January 2007, Lady Michele Renouf and Norman Finkelstein discuss The International Conference to Review the Global Vision of the Holocaust, also known as the Tehran Conference. Renouf discusses Finkelstein and this debate in a speech to The London Forum on July 20, 2016, which can viewed here: • Video
Wikipedia:
The International Conference to Review the Global Vision of the Holocaust was a two-day conference that opened on December 11, 2006, in Tehran, Iran. Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki said the conference sought "neither to deny nor prove the Holocaust... [but] to provide an appropriate scientific atmosphere for scholars to offer their opinions in freedom about a historical issue."[1] Notable attendees included David Duke, Moshe Aryeh Friedman, Robert Faurisson, Gerald Fredrick Töben, Richard Krege, Michèle Renouf, Ahmed Rami and Yisroel Dovid Weiss of Neturei Karta.[2]
The conference was widely described as a "Holocaust denial conference" or a "meeting of Holocaust deniers" by the Western media.
The conference provoked criticism.[28] The Vatican condemned it, the US administration of President George W. Bush called it an "affront to the entire civilized world," and British Prime Minister Tony Blair described it as "shocking beyond belief."[29] Holocaust historians attending a separate conference in Berlin organized in protest against the Iranian one called it "an attempt to cloak anti-Semitism in scholarly language."[30] --Wikipedia
At last the awe in which Finkelstein held me has been lifted. I have seen his feet of clay.
with right-thinking people, it's the exact opposite.
Until this very moment, I was an unconditional supporter of Finkelstein courage and logical thinking. But with what I have just heard him say, he simply proved that he can be totally inconsistent with himself and shot himself in the leg.
Huge disappointment from a 10 years admirer of Finkelstein.
Nevertheless, as we are living in Judeocratie, I will take the fewer valid arguments he has been bringing in on other debates.
Trust no one - learn from everyone.
Finkelstein is incredible on many aspects related to zionism. He is atrocious on many aspects of the Nazi history, however.
For once in his life he did the right thing and you condemn him. Figures.
Great argument by Lady Michele Renouf
WoW! never have I seen anybody destroyed in such a way
and someone destroy themselves at the same time.
There is no comeing back for Mr Finkelsitne - the scolar who
couldn't be bothered to learn "the woman's" name.
Adolf wasn't a scolar just an artist. Him and Lady Michèle Renouf
had things in common.
Sorry Lady Michèle Renouf was only a Flat Earther.
Technical College, National Art School, Royal Academy of Dancing, English Gardening School, Heythrop College (University of London).
"Basics" ??? "Bottom Line" ??? Come on...
He means the established facts.
Renouf discusses Finkelstein and this debate in a speech to The London Forum on July 20, 2016, which can viewed here: ruclips.net/video/PjE5BPtm4iI/видео.html
gracias por el link. Y comparto tu postura
Link is dead, anywhere else we can find it?
Is it a UKAZ of THE LOBBY that we must see JEWIPEDIA quotes on all those videos???
And was the last time any conference on the Holocaust invited revisionists to speak their side? I'm fairly certain never .
The holocaust is res judicata.
@@Boudicca-the-musical Res judicata by kangaroo courts.
@@Weltschmerz14 prove
@@Boudicca-the-musical Abuse and torture at Nuremberg is well documented, see the memoirs of Himmler's daughter Gurdun Burwitz for one example. Kidnapped and forced to "testify" and then when she was released complained of abuse and torture.
Or people like Paul Rassinier, a French-resistance fighter who was sent to a concentration camp, somebody who had every reason to hate the Nationalsocialists, and yet was charged for "Holocaust denial".
Ursula Haverbeck as well, a 90 year old woman getting a prison sentence for "Holocaust denial". Imagine being arrogant enough to tell someone they are wrong about THEIR experiences. Haverbeck lived through the war and was alive at the time, and is judged by people who were not even born yet.
The entire thing is a giant Ponzi scheme.
@jugramhasch88 holocaust denial cases are outside the scope of this discussion. As for Himmler's daughter, I wouldn't trust her. But in any case the issue isn't one particular case but the sheer volume of them. There's a difference between arguing about a particular person's involvement in the holocaust and arguing falsely that it didn't happen. I believe that people should be free to deny the holocaust. But I, for my part, will call then the liars that they are.
(As for Ponzi scheme, I don't think you know what a Ponzi scheme is.)
Norman Finkelstein le jugo la carta de sus parientes y ella patino. Bien jugado Norman! creo que Michele Renouf le tendría que haber dicho: seguramente murieron en los campos pero ¿como murieron? porque en el "como" esta la respuesta si hay holocausto o si no lo hay.
Type in: How democracy really works.,The Other Side of the Talmud Debate: Michael Hoffman Refutes a Defense of the Talmud. enjoy
When antisemitic scum can't win the debate on the instant subject (in this case the factuality of the holocaust), they try to change the subject to something else (in this case the Talmud).
Fienkelstein just razed these people to the ground. "what about my parents?"
"a... a... may be they're living in Israel. Under a false identity..." and "you're taking this too much at a personal level". It takes guts. Or lack of any sense of logic. And decency.
Just because he doesn't know what happened to his parents, doesn't automatically mean the Germans murdered them. That's pretty tenuous thinking.
@@degrelleholt6314 Actually it does.
David Irving already lost this fair fight in British courts. Secondly, one must question her motivation as a lifelong holocaust "truther" who cares nothing for Palestinians or Iranians.
If you seriously believe that was a "fair fight" you are a moron.
Oh My, I've watched this video before and I still remember Norman's Easter Bunny comment. Norman was the only "sane" person in this debate. Truly, the other three were talking in circles. Norman's was the only clear voice in this comical debate. Wow, stupid dilettantes ARE on every post; that revisionist Lady is a bold example! I admire Norman for keeping his cool and taking the time to straighten all out for the listeners, coz I would have exploded right at the beginning and slammed the phone down on them. :-D
You definitely do not know Norman Finkelstein at all. He is a supremely educated, well-read man. He never wears a mask. He is my dear friend and I am very happy for that. He's a gem. :-)
+Cavallo: Well, OK, know what? I am just defending my dear friend here. I'm not interested in getting into stupid spats with jerks. Present some credible proof to all those stupidities you've spat out.You obvously can't see the tip of your nose. You just go around and throw stones at those you hate. In a debate like this, your comments are laughable and useless.