Narrator says: "China planning a windturbine the size of the Eiffel Tower." Hey, Denmark HAVE a windmill in working production making energy every day, that are higher than the Eiffel Tower, NOW!
Another thing to note: Denmark is simultaneously investing massively into power transfer, such as using wind power to aid the electrolysis to generate clean hydrogen -which can be used either as fuel for cargo ships or trucks, or it can be stored over time and provide energy back into the grid as an alternative to a battery. The energy islands will aid in this green hydrogen production and allow Denmark to become the world's biggest supplier of green hydrogen, as the future's alternative to natural gas.
Most often the UK turbine parks are made in Denmark. But of course, with a significantly larger population they're more visible without covering the same percentage. All the British Isles have a good potential as well. But in particular, the north sea is favourable as it's relatively shallow compared to most other seas/oceans, that makes it a whole lot cheaper to build an off shore windfarm. Anyway, we'll never be able to compete with Norway that has a lot of potential hydro, while also being rich on gas and oil. Nothing compares to the mountain sheikhs.
Amdi is still a target of ridicule as he and his followers were deemed a cult... he's now hiding somewhere in Mexico to avoid some serious tax evasion charges. He did some good, but he built a cult around him quite like scientology... So he's not popular.
To the Eiffel tower tall windmills the Danish parliament is in the process of approving 450 meter tall windmills at the national testcenter at Østerild. Why test off shore windmills on land you might ask. It is easier and cheaper to install on land, and the north west coast of Jutland in Denmark is notorious for being windy all the time.
Regarding the UK not building atefixial islands, I think it has to do with the fact that you have much deeper water around the UK, so it would simply cost too much. The Baltic Sea has an average depth of 55 meters. The North Sea has an average depth of 93 meters, while the Atlantic has an average depth of 3646 meters. When it comes to fishing in particular, there is more evidence that they are actually benefiting fishing in the long run (of course not during the build-up). For example, there was a lot of fear around this when the bridge between Denmark and Sweden was built, but it turns out that it rather creates free zones for fish, where trawling is not possible. They kill some birds but only a tiny fraction of what, for example, domestic cats, cars and ordinary windows do. Birds are not stupid in the head, they understand that they should not fly into a turbine, but it is during a storm, when they involuntarily end up in them.
I think the real reason that the UK isn't building artificial islands is that we are an island, all the stuff that Denmark is planning to put on its islands, we put on the island of Great Britain. The other reason for the Danish islands is that they are building them half way between Denmark and Germany, and half way between Denmark and UK/Netherlands, so that they don't need to bring all the power from their wind farms into Denmark when they actually want to export it in the opposite direction. For the UK, we normally want all the power in GB. We do have cables to Denmark,Norway,Netherlands,France, but they normally bring power in to the country, our exports normally go to Ireland, and our big island of Great Britain is actually half way between our wind farms and Ireland, no extra island needed! If we do want to locate stuff in the North Sea then we put it on an oil rig like structure, much cheaper than an island. The other reason for building an island is the same as the new artificial islands in the South China Sea - if you own an island then you can claim the waters around it as yours, more sea area that you can build your wind farms in!
@@nigels.6051 Meh - the "sea" boarders are already defined between us (UK and DK) so making an island wouldn't change that. The islands are made so that the power can be transported to that island from the mils, and then from that island to shore, instead of having all the mills connect to the shore. There are also talks of having storage capabilities on the islands so that some of the power made can be stored at the island... Im not an expert, these where dreams before Covid and apparently Belgium listened and did it, where we are still in the "think about it" stage (aka, not enough money, yet)
@@nigels.6051 Although the reason you build them out at sea is because they disturb too much especially if you are going to build huge ones, another reason is as mentioned in the video that they provide a more even power supply as it is easier to find places at sea where it is almost always blowing.
1:48 We are not actually planning to build wind farms in all those areas. We recently made a marine spatial plan and those areas are allocated to renewable energy but that only means they can not be used for other stuff that will prevent wind farms like marine protected areas.
Offshore wind is probably now our cheapest source of power, onshore is maybe still less per MWh capacity, but onshore wind turbines rarely achieve their capacity, offshore turbines do much better. We will end up with floating wind being the cheapest source, still needs a bit of development though.
@@nigels.6051 no...Offshore is the most expensive form of energy (solar is the 2.), and will be so for years, if not forever...FYI nuclear is the cheapest, together with waterpower. But waterpower uses alot more materials..
@@JesperSandgreen That will depend on where you are, not much point installing solar in Alaska, not much point installing offshore wind at the equator. But we were discussing Denmark, and in Denmark Offshore Wind is cheap, solar is fairly pointless, although they do try, Nuclear is illegal, and how can you use hydro in a land that hardly has a hill 🤣
@@nigels.6051 No.... Offshore is not cheap.... It´s the most expensive, like i just said... Finland, France and Sweden have cheaper power then we do, because of nuclear... Again , Offshore is the most expensive of all ways to make power...
so with all of this "golden" talk about danish windmill technologi... we do not talk about the reality.. i am a danish guy, living in a part of denmark called Thy. here we (the local people) have been fighting against these giant companies for years. maybe they want to make the off shore windmill parks.. but they test those giants on land.. and they are testing it in (before) the local nature reserve.. in denmark we have a few nature locations that is so illigal to damage that you will go to jail for picjing the wrong flower.. Untill big companies like Vestas and Siemens pay the danish government. for about 12 years ago the government destroyed a BIG par of nature reserve (witch is the biggest area in northern europe for migratory birds) to put up 8 windmills, with the hight of 250 meters.. the locals fought against it, because we all feared that this was only the beginning. of course we (the locals) lost the case, and now we have a windmill test park, instead of our nature reserve. and on top of it all.. this year, the government and the big companys made new plans for new 450 meter windmills in the same area. and because of the noise of the windmills, the little danish towns around, will have to be expropriated. and the worst part is that after we got the first mills, is that the locals did not get offered cheaper energy. now we pay even more than before. not only are we destroying the little nature we have left in denmark. we also destroy the little danish towns that is the inspiration the the real danish culture. i dont know if it is worthy enought to make a video about this topic, because i still think it is a lost cause. but we need as mutch attention as we can, to show that this is good for the big companies and not for the "little man".
They only Say that the construction of the windmills was bad for the fish and Wheels but it's all So when the windmills is build it's vibration coming from that is also hammerfall to Wales and Fish.
Go to the "sort by" function of comments above and select "Newest first" instead of the default "Top comments" to read more comments. Hereunder the one where I explain how no batteries are needed to store energy but how it are stored anyway.
13:20 Unfortunately the energy island in the North Sea is indefinitely on pause and the "energy island" in the Baltic Sea is the island of Bornholm - not an artificial island that we have to build.
You build sustainable solutions in accordance to what is best for an area. Go for Sun if you have loads of sun and places to build it, Denmark (or the rest of the Nordics) is as known for sun as the UK is :D Sweden and Norway has Hydropower due to mountains and rain. (they have around 50 % of their need covered by that) Denmark has 0 mountains. They are experts in Hydro. Iceland handles it by Geothermal cause they are on Vulcanic ground 90% heat use and 25% of electricity. Denmark does not have volcanic areas. They are experts in Geothermal. Denmark has lots of Wind and shallow water. We get 50% of Electricity from Wind. Denmark is experts in Wind turbines. Each nation exports expertise and construction in those area to other nations such as Wind to UK.
- that's probably all well and good, but I live 500 meters from 2 onshore wind turbines they are so noisy, there is always a buzzing humming sound in the air it is so irritating
It's difficult this. What do we prefer, radioactivity that causes cancer, an irritating buzzing/humming, smog and shit in your lunges or that we build hydropower plants in our waterways? I don't think the world will ever agree . . .
Wind turbines only produce up to 10% of the energy consumed by Danes. I think he means electricity. Electricity is less than a third of the combined energy consumption. Heating takes much more.
In a free market economy mega windmills are now the cheapest means of electricity production if you have the conditions for it. The worlds largest transition project were signed in Jan 2023 by Belgium, Denmark, Germany and Netherlands and will transition 220 million Europeans away from fossil/nuclear fuel in just a decade. On top the worlds largest green hydrogen production. A small one digit percentage of the hydrogen will be used to ensure emission free electricity production even when the wind does not blow. The three large nations with highest emissions per capita are Australia, USA, Canada. All three nations have OPTIMAL conditions for offshore mega windmills and thus could decide to make a simple copy/paste of this project. They COULD thus transition away a considerable part of their emission fast and easy, create good taxgiving jobs at home AND laugh all the way to the bank. However it seems that the deep connections between the fossil fuel industry are the reason why these nations instead, in 2024, decides to spend billions and billions of taxpayer money to SUBSIDISE fossil fuels while climate change consequence costs explodes at the same time, as our atmospheric carbon content keeps climbing fast. NOTHING but the politicians and parties on offer prevents a fast and cheap transition. None of the governments in the three named nations have presented a plan to make their nations live up to their signed commitments in the Paris climate accord. The populations in those nations are being scammed and rest of the world are being held dangerously hostage by it. Climate tipping point after climate tipping point are being triggered and we are OUT OF TIME! We no longer have 2-3 election cycles to "wait and see". If someone want your vote a minimum requirement must be ability to present a credible transition plan for the nation they want to represent. Anything else is absurd
You are spot on there. Tvind was more of a cult than anything else. Mogens Amdi Petersen has had an international arrest warrant on him for many years. So give us a call if you see him.
The stereotypical attitude that You flash is really wrong and not thought out!!! I had a friend in Public School that was close to out of control in attitude and got in to fights with everybody! I am sure he had some problems at home because his home front was messy!! He had half sisters and brothes, one of them in a class of the same year!!! He was taken out of Public school and send to Tvind school as it was called and after a year I saw him again and he had changed radically from before! Was much calmer and straightened up as a person and stayed that way!!! Tvind was a good idea but the good got drowned out of greed and the part of the Left that want to break society from within........ I am sure You know the kind!?? This groop was the leadership of Tvind school and a lot of brilliant teachers with good intentions and ideas was caught in this mess!!! Just as a caveat to this I am political left leaning in most of my views so I am not talking smack of other political views here!!! Kind regards the Danish Viking
to give you som insight of what 1 kw will cost of wind energi when they done with then new 12.7 Gw wind farm in the north sea at Samsø and south of sea land. it will be 0,42 kr for 1 kw. plus taxes and delievering expensive. that mean around 2 dkr to 2.50. or in Pund sterling around 0,2 to 0,27 pund serling pr Kw. that is not expensive in our days after 2022 inflamation. that made El prices raise with over 80% in just a couple of month to over 200% at times. today the price for 1 kw is around 1 dkr. or 0,09 £ pr kw without any tax, with tax it around way higher than the price will be for the wind farm energi. Atm there is planned and started 12.7 Gw farms in north sea and at samsøe and south sea land. means that Denmark when they are done and should be around 2028 plus a couple of years, Denmark can produce study and cheap eletricity, to our own country and keep prices stabile, Its not just wind farm but also Sun farms, and more people invest in Wind turbines at home or ground warmed watersystem. meaning that eletricity is saved at those area, Again the repports shown that a whole new eco system have been started around those parks but and will give fish a more safe area of living. so again might be good investment for denmark. we already had a deal with England for delievering eletricity we couldnt use before brixit but falled throw due to brexit. sadly Also for this to work, Denmark have been working hard laying new cables throw east to vest and in jutland north to south and still working on that. so the energi net can handle the extreme high power that will be sent throw them. in all when denmark have finish the planned wind energi parks before 2050. we should have an estimated hourly production of new sea wind parks of around 24 GW. meaning that we produce between 5 to 10 for export every hour. meaning eletricity for between 1 and 3 million household more.
What failed due to Brexit? The Viking Link HVDC cable is right now busy delivering 1.5GW of electricity to the Great Britain electricity grid, I think most of it is electricity imported to Denmark from Norway, but you will be making a good profit!
I've been investing in Bitcoin by myself. I'm not really happy with what's going on, just few weeks ago I lost about $7,000 in a particular trade. Can you help me out or at least advise me on what to do?
The schools are called Tvind. Funnt because of the tVIND. Vind means Wind. But the "town" where the school starded are called Tvind. I have been to one of there schoold for 9 momths. I will call them close to a cult. They are far lefties and close to communists. And they try to BW people. But they ideas are good and they help many people who don´t fit into a daly life. But the problem with those schools are that they get or take to much money paid by the Danish taxpayer. The school still runs around the world today but they don´t get so much money from the Gov, today as they did then.
and our goverments advisors (vismændende ) just told the danish goverment to skip the project by bornholm. economicly it makes no sense, it was allready expensive 10 years ago. but today its 2-3 times more expensive
amdi petersen he ran whit the money and is hideing from the govement, now he is trying to get the govement to forget what he did so he can come home, that will never happen, if he come`s home a long jail time wait`s for him.
![Twenty One Pilots - “The Line” (from Arcane Season 2) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/E2Rj2gQAyPA/mqdefault.jpg)
Narrator says: "China planning a windturbine the size of the Eiffel Tower." Hey, Denmark HAVE a windmill in working production making energy every day, that are higher than the Eiffel Tower, NOW!
Another thing to note: Denmark is simultaneously investing massively into power transfer, such as using wind power to aid the electrolysis to generate clean hydrogen -which can be used either as fuel for cargo ships or trucks, or it can be stored over time and provide energy back into the grid as an alternative to a battery. The energy islands will aid in this green hydrogen production and allow Denmark to become the world's biggest supplier of green hydrogen, as the future's alternative to natural gas.
Most often the UK turbine parks are made in Denmark. But of course, with a significantly larger population they're more visible without covering the same percentage.
All the British Isles have a good potential as well.
But in particular, the north sea is favourable as it's relatively shallow compared to most other seas/oceans, that makes it a whole lot cheaper to build an off shore windfarm.
Anyway, we'll never be able to compete with Norway that has a lot of potential hydro, while also being rich on gas and oil.
Nothing compares to the mountain sheikhs.
Amdi is still a target of ridicule as he and his followers were deemed a cult... he's now hiding somewhere in Mexico to avoid some serious tax evasion charges.
He did some good, but he built a cult around him quite like scientology...
So he's not popular.
To the Eiffel tower tall windmills the Danish parliament is in the process of approving 450 meter tall windmills at the national testcenter at Østerild. Why test off shore windmills on land you might ask. It is easier and cheaper to install on land, and the north west coast of Jutland in Denmark is notorious for being windy all the time.
Wind turbines
Regarding the UK not building atefixial islands, I think it has to do with the fact that you have much deeper water around the UK, so it would simply cost too much. The Baltic Sea has an average depth of 55 meters. The North Sea has an average depth of 93 meters, while the Atlantic has an average depth of 3646 meters.
When it comes to fishing in particular, there is more evidence that they are actually benefiting fishing in the long run (of course not during the build-up). For example, there was a lot of fear around this when the bridge between Denmark and Sweden was built, but it turns out that it rather creates free zones for fish, where trawling is not possible. They kill some birds but only a tiny fraction of what, for example, domestic cats, cars and ordinary windows do. Birds are not stupid in the head, they understand that they should not fly into a turbine, but it is during a storm, when they involuntarily end up in them.
You're totally wrong. UK is building 2 GW windfarms on Doggerbank, where ocean debt is as low as 13-20m, so they don't need artificial islands.
I think the real reason that the UK isn't building artificial islands is that we are an island, all the stuff that Denmark is planning to put on its islands, we put on the island of Great Britain. The other reason for the Danish islands is that they are building them half way between Denmark and Germany, and half way between Denmark and UK/Netherlands, so that they don't need to bring all the power from their wind farms into Denmark when they actually want to export it in the opposite direction. For the UK, we normally want all the power in GB. We do have cables to Denmark,Norway,Netherlands,France, but they normally bring power in to the country, our exports normally go to Ireland, and our big island of Great Britain is actually half way between our wind farms and Ireland, no extra island needed! If we do want to locate stuff in the North Sea then we put it on an oil rig like structure, much cheaper than an island. The other reason for building an island is the same as the new artificial islands in the South China Sea - if you own an island then you can claim the waters around it as yours, more sea area that you can build your wind farms in!
@@nigels.6051 Meh - the "sea" boarders are already defined between us (UK and DK) so making an island wouldn't change that. The islands are made so that the power can be transported to that island from the mils, and then from that island to shore, instead of having all the mills connect to the shore. There are also talks of having storage capabilities on the islands so that some of the power made can be stored at the island... Im not an expert, these where dreams before Covid and apparently Belgium listened and did it, where we are still in the "think about it" stage (aka, not enough money, yet)
@@nigels.6051
Although the reason you build them out at sea is because they disturb too much especially if you are going to build huge ones, another reason is as mentioned in the video that they provide a more even power supply as it is easier to find places at sea where it is almost always blowing.
@@mcstaal Okay.
1:48 We are not actually planning to build wind farms in all those areas. We recently made a marine spatial plan and those areas are allocated to renewable energy but that only means they can not be used for other stuff that will prevent wind farms like marine protected areas.
And the plans are postponed indefinitely.
The Danish electricity costs for end consumers are high because of taxes but the production costs are low.
Offshore wind is probably now our cheapest source of power, onshore is maybe still less per MWh capacity, but onshore wind turbines rarely achieve their capacity, offshore turbines do much better. We will end up with floating wind being the cheapest source, still needs a bit of development though.
Only "normal" electricity for stoves, tvs, lights and so on is expensive, for heating and charging an ev, the average price is 8 pee.
@@nigels.6051 no...Offshore is the most expensive form of energy (solar is the 2.), and will be so for years, if not forever...FYI nuclear is the cheapest, together with waterpower. But waterpower uses alot more materials..
@@JesperSandgreen That will depend on where you are, not much point installing solar in Alaska, not much point installing offshore wind at the equator. But we were discussing Denmark, and in Denmark Offshore Wind is cheap, solar is fairly pointless, although they do try, Nuclear is illegal, and how can you use hydro in a land that hardly has a hill 🤣
@@nigels.6051 No.... Offshore is not cheap.... It´s the most expensive, like i just said... Finland, France and Sweden have cheaper power then we do, because of nuclear...
Again , Offshore is the most expensive of all ways to make power...
so with all of this "golden" talk about danish windmill technologi... we do not talk about the reality.. i am a danish guy, living in a part of denmark called Thy. here we (the local people) have been fighting against these giant companies for years. maybe they want to make the off shore windmill parks.. but they test those giants on land.. and they are testing it in (before) the local nature reserve.. in denmark we have a few nature locations that is so illigal to damage that you will go to jail for picjing the wrong flower.. Untill big companies like Vestas and Siemens pay the danish government.
for about 12 years ago the government destroyed a BIG par of nature reserve (witch is the biggest area in northern europe for migratory birds) to put up 8 windmills, with the hight of 250 meters.. the locals fought against it, because we all feared that this was only the beginning. of course we (the locals) lost the case, and now we have a windmill test park, instead of our nature reserve.
and on top of it all.. this year, the government and the big companys made new plans for new 450 meter windmills in the same area. and because of the noise of the windmills, the little danish towns around, will have to be expropriated. and the worst part is that after we got the first mills, is that the locals did not get offered cheaper energy. now we pay even more than before.
not only are we destroying the little nature we have left in denmark. we also destroy the little danish towns that is the inspiration the the real danish culture.
i dont know if it is worthy enought to make a video about this topic, because i still think it is a lost cause. but we need as mutch attention as we can, to show that this is good for the big companies and not for the "little man".
They only Say that the construction of the windmills was bad for the fish and Wheels but it's all So when the windmills is build it's vibration coming from that is also hammerfall to Wales and Fish.
Go to the "sort by" function of comments above and select "Newest first" instead of the default "Top comments" to read more comments. Hereunder the one where I explain how no batteries are needed to store energy but how it are stored anyway.
13:20 Unfortunately the energy island in the North Sea is indefinitely on pause and the "energy island" in the Baltic Sea is the island of Bornholm - not an artificial island that we have to build.
Because Energy Islands is also Home For The Ocean and the life in the ocean
You build sustainable solutions in accordance to what is best for an area.
Go for Sun if you have loads of sun and places to build it, Denmark (or the rest of the Nordics) is as known for sun as the UK is :D
Sweden and Norway has Hydropower due to mountains and rain. (they have around 50 % of their need covered by that) Denmark has 0 mountains. They are experts in Hydro.
Iceland handles it by Geothermal cause they are on Vulcanic ground 90% heat use and 25% of electricity. Denmark does not have volcanic areas. They are experts in Geothermal.
Denmark has lots of Wind and shallow water. We get 50% of Electricity from Wind. Denmark is experts in Wind turbines.
Each nation exports expertise and construction in those area to other nations such as Wind to UK.
- that's probably all well and good, but I live 500 meters from 2 onshore wind turbines they are so noisy, there is always a buzzing humming sound in the air it is so irritating
It's difficult this. What do we prefer, radioactivity that causes cancer, an irritating buzzing/humming, smog and shit in your lunges or that we build hydropower plants in our waterways? I don't think the world will ever agree . . .
Like trafic... I can hear the konstant humming from the motorway.
Half of our energy is not covered by windpower. Half our electrical demand sure. But not 50% of the total energy demand.
Amdi Petersen is today a wanted man.
Wind turbines only produce up to 10% of the energy consumed by Danes. I think he means electricity. Electricity is less than a third of the combined energy consumption. Heating takes much more.
🤣🤣 from denmark
57,4 % of Denmarks energi comes from Green energi….
tribal axes generator in that eiffel tower mill - it,s a monster / why build 3 when you have the wind for 1 giant one
In a free market economy mega windmills are now the cheapest means of electricity production if you have the conditions for it. The worlds largest transition project were signed in Jan 2023 by Belgium, Denmark, Germany and Netherlands and will transition 220 million Europeans away from fossil/nuclear fuel in just a decade. On top the worlds largest green hydrogen production. A small one digit percentage of the hydrogen will be used to ensure emission free electricity production even when the wind does not blow. The three large nations with highest emissions per capita are Australia, USA, Canada. All three nations have OPTIMAL conditions for offshore mega windmills and thus could decide to make a simple copy/paste of this project. They COULD thus transition away a considerable part of their emission fast and easy, create good taxgiving jobs at home AND laugh all the way to the bank. However it seems that the deep connections between the fossil fuel industry are the reason why these nations instead, in 2024, decides to spend billions and billions of taxpayer money to SUBSIDISE fossil fuels while climate change consequence costs explodes at the same time, as our atmospheric carbon content keeps climbing fast.
NOTHING but the politicians and parties on offer prevents a fast and cheap transition. None of the governments in the three named nations have presented a plan to make their nations live up to their signed commitments in the Paris climate accord. The populations in those nations are being scammed and rest of the world are being held dangerously hostage by it. Climate tipping point after climate tipping point are being triggered and we are OUT OF TIME! We no longer have 2-3 election cycles to "wait and see". If someone want your vote a minimum requirement must be ability to present a credible transition plan for the nation they want to represent. Anything else is absurd
Its all due to taxes and EU !!!! Its so expensive because we pay high tax and Co2 charges on all our electricity to both the state and EU ....
You are spot on there. Tvind was more of a cult than anything else. Mogens Amdi Petersen has had an international arrest warrant on him for many years. So give us a call if you see him.
The stereotypical attitude that You flash is really wrong and not thought out!!!
I had a friend in Public School that was close to out of control in attitude and got in to fights with everybody!
I am sure he had some problems at home because his home front was messy!! He had half sisters and brothes, one of them in a class of the same year!!!
He was taken out of Public school and send to Tvind school as it was called and after a year I saw him again and he had changed radically from before!
Was much calmer and straightened up as a person and stayed that way!!!
Tvind was a good idea but the good got drowned out of greed and the part of the Left that want to break society from within........ I am sure You know the kind!??
This groop was the leadership of Tvind school and a lot of brilliant teachers with good intentions and ideas was caught in this mess!!!
Just as a caveat to this I am political left leaning in most of my views so I am not talking smack of other political views here!!!
Kind regards the Danish Viking
Energy Prices in DK are regulted by EU ! 😢 and runs in billions in taxes and in DK we love paying taxes!
to give you som insight of what 1 kw will cost of wind energi when they done with then new 12.7 Gw wind farm in the north sea at Samsø and south of sea land. it will be 0,42 kr for 1 kw. plus taxes and delievering expensive. that mean around 2 dkr to 2.50. or in Pund sterling around 0,2 to 0,27 pund serling pr Kw. that is not expensive in our days after 2022 inflamation. that made El prices raise with over 80% in just a couple of month to over 200% at times. today the price for 1 kw is around 1 dkr. or 0,09 £ pr kw without any tax, with tax it around way higher than the price will be for the wind farm energi.
Atm there is planned and started 12.7 Gw farms in north sea and at samsøe and south sea land. means that Denmark when they are done and should be around 2028 plus a couple of years, Denmark can produce study and cheap eletricity, to our own country and keep prices stabile, Its not just wind farm but also Sun farms, and more people invest in Wind turbines at home or ground warmed watersystem. meaning that eletricity is saved at those area,
Again the repports shown that a whole new eco system have been started around those parks but and will give fish a more safe area of living.
so again might be good investment for denmark. we already had a deal with England for delievering eletricity we couldnt use before brixit but falled throw due to brexit. sadly
Also for this to work, Denmark have been working hard laying new cables throw east to vest and in jutland north to south and still working on that. so the energi net can handle the extreme high power that will be sent throw them. in all when denmark have finish the planned wind energi parks before 2050. we should have an estimated hourly production of new sea wind parks of around 24 GW. meaning that we produce between 5 to 10 for export every hour. meaning eletricity for between 1 and 3 million household more.
What failed due to Brexit? The Viking Link HVDC cable is right now busy delivering 1.5GW of electricity to the Great Britain electricity grid, I think most of it is electricity imported to Denmark from Norway, but you will be making a good profit!
Hit $135k today. I'm really grateful for all the knowledge and nuggets you had thrown my way over the last months. Started with 14k in January
How please
I've been investing in Bitcoin by myself. I'm not really happy with what's going on, just few weeks ago I lost about $7,000 in a particular trade. Can you help me out or at least advise me on what to do?
I will advise you stop trading on your own if you keep losing. And i don't trade on my own anymore, I always required help and assistance
She's my family personal Broker and also a Broker to many families here in the United states, she is a licensed Broker.
😱Sounds familiar, I have heard her names on several occasions.. And both her success stories on wall street journey!
maby the polar bears we save can catch and eat the deaf whales
The schools are called Tvind. Funnt because of the tVIND. Vind means Wind. But the "town" where the school starded are called Tvind. I have been to one of there schoold for 9 momths. I will call them close to a cult. They are far lefties and close to communists. And they try to BW people. But they ideas are good and they help many people who don´t fit into a daly life. But the problem with those schools are that they get or take to much money paid by the Danish taxpayer. The school still runs around the world today but they don´t get so much money from the Gov, today as they did then.
Wind turbines are so cheap and good that you will get paid for using wind power! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
thats why we pay 5kr per kw/h tomrrow in dk 🙃
with our tax no one gets paid, the producers are just loosing money..
dont fool yourself
@Hansen710 You are clearly a stupid Dane! You must go to your doctor to get some stronger tablets!🏳️🌈🇩🇰🏳️🌈🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤣🤣🤣🤣
Down with windpower. Up with nukepower.
Electric energy CAN be stored as Hydrogen. Actualle the first hydrogenpipe Denmark-Germany has just been completede.
Yes, but it's VERY inefficient..🧐
and our goverments advisors (vismændende ) just told the danish goverment to skip the project by bornholm.
economicly it makes no sense, it was allready expensive 10 years ago.
but today its 2-3 times more expensive
the only reason it's so expensive and Denmark gains energy is because of US corporate greed that I've seeped into the entire EU
No its bc. Of taxes.
The UK are so large, that it can achive, what we are trying to do with the platforms, simply by placing windmills in each corner of the realm.
amdi petersen he ran whit the money and is hideing from the govement, now he is trying to get the govement to forget what he did so he can come home, that will never happen, if he come`s home a long jail time wait`s for him.
The mills spread microplastic that the fish absorb and later we eat.
I just hope we also invest in nuclear. If we want to meet increasing energy needs AND reduce carbon, we need every method we have available.
Read up on Copenhagen Atomics.