Dude, I can observe so many prejudices while you narrate your information. If you wanna be a historian then work on your way of delivering information. I won't pronounce any particular point when I observed you are under influence of your prejudices since your brain will trick you into providing some argument for that which you will find the logical rational conclusion. I wish someday you will be a historian if you are aspiring to be One.
Sorry to say it seems that your work is based on same existing works of Historians many of whom used their political agenda to distort history. #There are so many scientific evidences coming against AMT. Why don't you invite some of those researchers and debates with them on those points, like Genetics, linguistics,textual,etc.? There is a mathematical model also against it. On origin of Mauryan and Guptas also there seems to be Unnecessary confusion. Do remember that Buddhist Religious texts are full of Hindu hatered and so this point must be considered while using their text for Historical study.
I HAVE taught History for 40 years with a PhD in History and retired as a Professor of History in a Central University and I commend Shri Jay Vardhan Singh for his deep knowledge and grasp over Historiography. He is keeping Indian History alive after a 40 year drought.
That is why when talking about history, one must always keep the following phrases in mind : 1. "out of the sites excavated TILL NOW." 2. "Schools of Thought." 3. "Interpretation."
Yeh banda koi bohat naya khoj nahi kar rahe hain. Yeh joh available writings hain jiss mein Marxist views dominate kartein numbers ke hisab se, ussi ke basis pe apni study kar rahe hain. Aryan Migration ke time pe yeh kese muskara raha hain dekha? Aryan Migration theory ke against itne scientific evidences hain, genetics se leke archaeological tak,ki ab bhi woh agar ussko History mein phadhya jara hain toh woh sivayein political conspiracy ke aur kuch nahi kaha jaasakta. Maurya kshatriya hotein toh unnko Maghadh ke capture ke samayein magadh ke Brahmano ka virodh naa jhelna padta. Yeh fact koi deny nahi karsakta. Exact kya origin hain yeh pata nahi lekin Maurya lower origin ke teh yeh general consensus hain. Aur Chandra Gupta Maurya toh vedic religion hi follow kar rahe teh. Ashok ke time se Buddhism pe zor diya. Buddhist religion text shuru se Hindu hate aur Hindu phobia se grasit rahe hain.. toh unki historical literature mein woh point humshea rahe ga yeh point clear rehna chahiyein. Aur ganga ke pass dimonds ka kabhi koi evidence nahi raha...lol Gupta kings kushan ke vassals ke tod pe hi shuru huwe teh aur woh Merchants teh joh land lords ki tarah bane..jaha se kings bane. Marriage wala arguments toh unnpe bhi lagu hota hain.
48:33 Awanti has two capitals Northern capital Was Ujjaini and Southern Capital was Mahishmati Present day Maheshwar. Maheshwar was capital of Hehaiya King Sahtrarjun. An ancient temple of Sahtrarjun also here.
Amazing podcast with rare great content.This type of content is what I call ancient Indian history.Jay Vardhan Singh Sir has done an amazing job by doing reasearch about this topic,this podcast deserves at least 10 million views ❤❤❤👍👍👍
Bhai he is a pseudo-secular & eurocentric historian. Doesn't read a single academics outside of the missionary academia. Even the basic chronology of Bharatiya history he uses is so flawed. Furthermore, Greece was the real oligarchic slave state which is attested in their own texts. Socrates, born in an aristocratic family, hated democracy!
Arihant Bhai aur aise history, culture, civilization se related podcasts lao Aur ek request please 🙏 Annamalai ko bulane ka try karo and talk to him not only about Tamilnadu politics but also his life, his views on culture, history, Hindutva, Bharat,etc
@@dwight2762 do you know that all the left is politician, media, and historians call themselves and try to show them self as secular and unbiased where we Hindus are so much stupid that we proudly say that we are from right wing and that's why we lose our race for the long run
Bring AnnaMalai, and talk about his vision about India and TN. What issues he sees and how he plans to resolve? also ask him what keeps him going and why he wear expensive ⌚watches.
Traditionally, the Jambūdvīpa (Indian subcontinent) had many territorial kingdoms since early Rigvedic era. These territorial kingdoms gradually led to the development of territorial political identities and regional communities which came to be known as janapadas. Some of these janapadas had politically dominated over the neighbouring janapadas for a long period and came to be known as Mahājanapadas. Rigveda mentions Purus, Bharatas, Turvaśas, Yadus, Anus and Druhyus. Yajurveda has the reference of Magadha. Atharvaveda mentions Aṅga, Magadha, Gāndhāra and Mujavat kingdoms or janapadas. Numerous janapadas are found mentioned in texts like Aitareya, Śatapatha, Purāṇas, Rāmāyana, and Mahābhārata, etc. The Indian subcontinent was broadly divided into sixteen Mahājanapadas after Mahābhārata era. According to early Buddhist sources like Aṅguttara Nikāya of Sutta Piṭaka, Aṅga, Magadha, Kāshi, Kosala, Vajji, Malla, Chedi, Vatsa, Kuru, Pāñchāla, Matsya, Śūrasena, Aśmaka, Avanti, Gāndhāra and Kāmboja(Bāhlika) were the sixteen Mahājanapadas. Dirgha Nikāya refers to six pairs of Mahājanapadas of Uttarāpatha, namely, Aṅga-Magadha, Kāshi-Kosala, Vajji-Malla, Chedi-Vatsa, Kuru-Pāñchāla and Matsya-Śūrasena. In ancient times, the region north of Narmadā River was known as Uttarāpatha whereas the region south of Narmadā River was known as Dakśiṇāpatha. Seemingly, Dirgha Nikāya did not mention the Avanti-Aśmaka janapadas of Dakśiṇāpatha and the Gāndhāra-Kāmboja janapadas of north-western India. Thus, there were mainly sixteen janapadas. Chullaniddeśa mentions another Mahājanapada named Kaliṅga and also substitute Yona or Yavana for Gāndhāra. Post decline of Aśmakas during the reign of Nanda dynasty of Magadha, Kaliṅga also emerged as a Mahājanapada. Since the Yavanas occupied and reigned over the Gāndhāra region around 1800-1200 BCE, which also came to be known as Yavana Mahājanapada. Śivi, Daśārṇa, Sindhu, Sauvīra, Kāshmira, Paurava, Vaṅga, Paunḍra and Kāmarūpa were also important janapadas. The Kosala Mahājanapada of Ikśvāku kings dominated over north India during the period of Tretā Yuga (6777-5577 BCE) and the first half of Dvāpara Yuga (5577-4377 BCE) whereas the Kuru Mahājanapada of Kuru kings dominated over north India during the Mahābhārata era. The Magadha Mahājanapada emerged as a major political power after Mahābhārata era.
श्रीमान जी त्रेता और द्वापर युग (राम और महाभारत) का जो कालखण्ड आप बता रहे हैं उस समय का कोई उत्खनन प्रमाण प्राप्त नहीं हो रहा है जबकि रामायण, महाभारत ग्रंथों में उनके महान नगरों का वर्णन आता है। इससे संदेह पैदा होता है। पुरातत्वविद श्री बीबी लाल के नेतृत्व में महाभारत और रामायण कालीन स्थलों का उत्खनन कराया गया। किसी भी स्थल पर 700-800 बीसी से पुराने मानव बस्ती का प्रमाण नही मिलते। कृपया प्रतिक्रिया दें।
@@jagbirsinghmann1966 Can Sinauli burials be non-Vedic? Some analysts are dismissing Sinauli as un related to Vedic culture or Samskṛtī because the people are buried instead of cremated. It is sure cremation is popular in Sanātana Dharma, but burials are also present in our tradition. Burials are also mentioned in Ṛgveda as one of the ways in which the dead individuals are treated, as we have already seen. Another doubt that has arisen is due to the design of the head-gears. The head-gear of some of the warriors contains horns. In the current depictions of our ancient people, the horned-headgear is associated with the Daityas and the Dānavas. It will be misleading to conclude that Sinauli is non-Vedic based on these factors alone. The Bharatas and their ancestors were an admixture of the Ādityas, the Daityas and the Dānavas. The ancestral king Yayāti had two wives Devayāni and Ṡarmiṣthā. Devayāni, is the daughter of Daitya Guru Ṡukrāchārya. She is the mother of Yadu and Turvaṡa, the eldest sons of Yayāti. Ṡarmiṣthā is the daughter of the Daitya king Vṛṣaparvā. She is the mother of Anu, Druhyu and Pūru, the younger sons of Yayāti. The mother of all the Yadavas is Devayāni and the mother of Pūru, the founder of the Pūru dynasty is Ṡarmiṣthā, both Daitya women. The Bharatas descended from the Pūrus and the Kurus like the Pāndavas and Kauravas descended from the Bharatas. Kṛṣṇa, Balarāma and other Vṛṣnis descended from the Yadavas. The Dānavas like Maya were allies of the Paṇḍavas who gave them many weapons and chariots. The chariot of Arjuna came from Varuṇa, who is revered by the Bhargava sages like the Asura Guru Sukrachārya and by the sages in the lineage of Vasiṣṭha and Agastya. Vasiṣṭha was the priest of Sri Rama. Vyasa was the descendant of Vasiṣṭha and the grandfather and guide of the Paṇḍavas. The Ṛgveda mentions many wars and the Purāṇas render them as the wars between the Devas and the Asuras. But if we analyse the Ṛgveda closely, these wars are fought between the people who worship Indra (like the Purus and the Bharatas) and the other people who don't worship Indra (like the Anus and the Druhyus). The Purāṇas portrayed the people who do not worship Indra as the Asuras, categorizing them as Daityas and Dānavas. The word used by Ṛgveda for the non-Indra worshipers is anindra (those who are without Indra) and avrata (those who don't have any devotion to Indra). The Sinauli settlement with their burial practices and horned head-gears can as well belong to the groups affiliated to the Daitya-Dānavas like Maya Dānava. But this doesn't make them non-Vedic, because Dānavas like Maya do have a place in our Veda, Itihasa Purāṇas. The Analysis of the Place Names The place Sinauli falls in the Kuru Rāṣtra, or the Kuru Janapada, the region between Ganga in the east and Sarasvati in the west and divided by Yamuna into two parts. A place named after Maya viz. Mayastali or Mayarāṣtra (Meerut, 52 km away) is close to Sinauli. The places mentioned in the Mahābhārata like the Vyāghra-prasta (Baghpat, 25 km away), Svarna-prasta (Sonipat, 29 km away), Paniprasta (35 km away), Varanavati (21 km away) are close to Sinauli. Hastinapura is 75 km to the east and Indraprasta is 55 km to the south of Sinauli. Paruṡurāma Kṣetra (now Alamgirpur, the eastern most Harappan settlement, 3300-1300 BCE) is 33 km away from Sinauli, where Paruṡurāma taught weaponry to Bhīṣma. The region around Sinauli is dotted with places resembling chariot construction such as Rathora (Rathakāra - chariot-maker, 6 km away) and Luhara (Lohakāra - metal worker, 2 km away). The name Sinauli is likely a derived form of Sina-sthali, similar to the other place-names in Kuru Rashtra ending with the suffix 'sthali' (meaning - a place) like Bastali (Vyasa-sthali), Bamanauli (Brahmana-sthali). The place names in Kuru Rashtra, contains suffixes like Prasta, Sthali and Kṣetra. The word 'sina' means a 'store’, 'garment' 'fetter', 'bond', 'body' etc, implying that it is one of the places associated with making chariots and weapons. Probably the people who lived in this Sinauli settlement were a warrior class of men and women supplying weapons to the army of the kings. Sinauli and the Kurukṣetra War Whether the warriors buried in the Sinauli burials participated in the Kurukṣetra War as one among the many small military units, depends on the chosen date of the Kurukṣetra War. Sinauli excavations are dated to 2100 BCE to 1900 BCE. One of the Kurukṣetra War dates close to it is 1793 BCE proposed by Shri Ashok Bhatnagar. If we take this Kurukṣetra War as the basis, then the Sinauli warriors were 100 to 300 years older to the Kurukṣetra War, placing them as part of the late Ṛgvedic period, during the formative periods of the 1st, 5th, 8th, 9th or the 10th Maṇḍalas, especially the 10th Maṇḍala. Several battles are mentioned in these Maṇḍalas too, like in the older Maṇḍalas. With the Kurukṣetra War date at 1793 BCE, we can date Samtanu mentioned in the 10th Maṇḍala of Ṛgveda to around 1930 BCE. Samtanu is the youngest king in the lineage of the Bharata kings mentioned in the Ṛgveda, who also appear as the ancestors of the Pāṇḍavas and the Kauravas who waged the Kurukṣetra War. In the linage of kings leading to the Pāṇḍavas, the Ṛgveda stops at Samtanu. In the linage of sages leading to Vyāsa, the Ṛgveda stops at Parāṡara. Samtanu’s son Vicitravīrya and Parāṡara’s son Vyāsa is in the future of Ṛgveda. Dhṛtarāṣtra and Pāṇdu are the next generation of Vicitravīrya and Vyāsa. The Kauravas and the Pāṇḍavas who took place in the Kurukṣetra War are in the next generation of Dhṛtarāṣtra and Pāṇdu. Thus, this date 1793 BCE corroborates well with our analysis that the chariot and the Sinauli burial sites belong to the 10th Maṇḍala funeral hymns which speaks about the burials. Another date of Kurukṣetra War 1952 BCE is from Shri Mohan Gupta. If we follow this date, then this settlement falls right in the Kurukṣetra War period. The 3K Kurukṣetra War dates of Shri Vedaveer Arya (3162 BCE) and Manish Pandit (3067 BCE) will make the settlement well into the future of the lifetime of the Kuru-Paṇḍavas during the lifetime of their descendants named in the Purāṇas like Viṣṇu Purāṇa. There is another date by Shri KK Ramamurthy at 1504 BCE and RN Iyengar at 1478 BCE which will make this settlement part of the middle Ṛgvedic period of Maṇḍala 2 and 4, closer to the lifetime of the sages like Gr̥tsamada and kings like Sahadeva and Somaka or even to the early period of Maṇḍala 6, 3 and 7, closer to the lifetime of the kings like Sudās and Divodāsa depending upon the variability in the chronology of the Maṇḍala wise evolution of the Ṛgveda.
@@nirmalchandrabiswas6403 शव को दफनाना भी एक धार्मिक मान्य विधि थी। आज भी कुछ हिन्दु और सन्यासी तो लगभग सभी शव को दबाते और समाधि देते हैं। बच्चों के शवों को भी दफनाया जाता है। दबाना या जलाना किसी धर्म विशेष की एकमात्र शव निस्तारण विधि नहीं है।
@@jagbirsinghmann1966 prepared for the burial rituals as a sub category of the Soma carts corresponding to the 10th Maṇḍala burial related hymns. A possible Ṛgvedic Connection The Ṛgvedic hymn 15 in the 10th Maṇḍala speaks about both burying the dead (anagni-dagdha) and cremating them (agni-dagdha). The hymn 18 of the 10th Maṇḍala talks about a burial house (gṛha) often compared to a womb (yoni) where ghee (clarified butter) is kept in pots. This matches with the 116 burial houses unearthed at Sinauli. They contain many earthen pots which could have been used to fill offerings like ghee, butter and medicines. The Ṛgvedic hymn 18 of the 10th Maṇḍala mentions about taking the bow from the hand of the dead. The bow of the warrior taken from his hand is placed beside the dead-body of the warriors in Sinauli. Along with the bow, other weapons of the warrior like the shields and swords are kept. Their chariots too are kept in the burial house. A pair of chariots are seen in one of the Sinauli burial house possibly belonging to a king or a chief. This is close to the descriptions of the pair of Soma Carts mentioned in the Ṛgveda (Hymn 13 of the 10th Maṇḍala). One of them represents mortality (Yamayāna) and another immortality (Devayāna). The pair, Yama and Yami, are the overseers of death since Yama, the son of Vivasvat, chose mortality instead of immortality and hence is the first mortal. The hymn compares the deceased with Yama and Yami pair and urges them to choose mortality instead of immortality for the sake of the devatas and for the sake of their offspring. The hymn talks about the five steps (pañca padāni) to climb the mount (rupa) and to ascend the four-legged bed (Catuṣpadī) as per the ritual injunctions. These four-legged death beds or coffins, where the dead body is placed are found in the Sinauli burials. The mount mentioned in the verse may be referring to the burial mounts. The Ṛgveda 10th Maṇḍala hymn 15 also talks about ritual offerings of Soma, butter and ghee (clarified butter) to the forefathers inside the burial house. The ritual pots found inside the Sinauli burials indicate offerings made to these forefathers. Thus, the Sinauli burial sites resemble very closely with the descriptions of the funeral hymns in the 10th Maṇḍala of Ṛgveda. Some individuals are mentioned in the Ṛgveda Anukramaṇi (as authors of hymns) with the suffix Yāmāyana indicating that they are deceased with some significant death ceremonies given for them. Śaṅkha Yāmāyana (RV 10.15), Damana Yāmāyana (RV 10.16), Devaśravas Yāmāyana (RV 10.17), Saṃkusuka Yāmāyana (RV 10.18), Mathita Yāmāyana (RV 10.19), Kumāra Yāmāyana (RV 10.135) and Ūrdhvakr̥śana Yāmāyana (RV 10.144). The name of the king or chief who is buried with the two chariots in the Sinauli burial site, could be any of these names. Kumāra and Ūrdhvakr̥śana are not directly related to the funeral though related to death. Devaśravas is an ancient king ancestral to Divodāsa and ancient than the oldest Maṇḍalas like 3, 7 and 6 and hence can be excluded. Mathita too can be excluded as the narrative is not close to funerals but to cows. Damana is cremated instead of buried as the corresponding hymn (RV 10.16) urges the fire (Agni) to be gentle with his body as it burns. The hymn of Śaṅkha too leans towards cremation. Saṃkusuka is surely buried as indicated by the corresponding hymn (RV 10.18). Hence this burial with two chariots could as well be that of Saṃkusuka. The hymn urges the earth to be gentle, be soft as wool, to his body as he is buried. उप सर्प मातरम् भूमिम् एताम् उरुव्यचसम् पृथिवीं सुशेवाम् | ऊर्णम्रदा युवतिर् दक्षिणावत एषा त्वा पातु निरृतेर् उपस्थात् ||
I know this guy. I started following his work/ channel when he had a small base. Call it my personal bias, stopped watching him after knowing the faact that he is a social science student from JNU. Arihant, you will make me follow his work again. I hope Jay's work actually tells us History and not Left Distory
History of India in the Iron age is marvellous, its absolutely shameful that it is not taught on a large scale and with great fervour in our educational institutes.
Great podcast. Jay Vardhan knowledge in Ancient History is awesome. I wish we had more sources to study Ancient History just like we have for Mediaeval History.
Yeh banda koi bohat naya khoj nahi kar rahe hain. Yeh joh available writings hain jiss mein Marxist views dominate kartein numbers ke hisab se, ussi ke basis pe apni study kar rahe hain. Aryan Migration ke time pe yeh kese muskara raha hain dekha? Aryan Migration theory ke against itne scientific evidences hain, genetics se leke archaeological tak,ki ab bhi woh agar ussko History mein phadhya jara hain toh woh sivayein political conspiracy ke aur kuch nahi kaha jaasakta. Maurya kshatriya hotein toh unnko Maghadh ke capture ke samayein magadh ke Brahmano ka virodh naa jhelna padta. Yeh fact koi deny nahi karsakta. Exact kya origin hain yeh pata nahi lekin Maurya lower origin ke teh yeh general consensus hain. Aur Chandra Gupta Maurya toh vedic religion hi follow kar rahe teh. Ashok ke time se Buddhism pe zor diya. Buddhist religion text shuru se Hindu hate aur Hindu phobia se grasit rahe hain.. toh unki historical literature mein woh point humshea rahe ga yeh point clear rehna chahiyein. Aur ganga ke pass dimonds ka kabhi koi evidence nahi raha...lol Gupta kings kushan ke vassals ke tod pe hi shuru huwe teh aur woh Merchants teh joh land lords ki tarah bane..jaha se kings bane. Marriage wala arguments toh unnpe bhi lagu hota hain.
@@chandra_himanshu Marxist historians are thousand times better than dindu nationalist pipedream sellers. Only good hindu nationalist historians R C majumdar.
@@chandra_himanshu Maurya were Kshatriyas of purest clan ...the first mention of so called shudra origin comes in Mudraraksham which was written 600 year later by Brahmin lobby to undermine as Mauryan patronized budhhism
Ancient Indian Geography as Described by Rājaśekhara (3rd century CE) Sanskrit poet Rājaśekhara was the teacher of Pratīhāra King Mahendrapāla. He divided Āryavarta into five parts, Pūrvadeśa, Dakśiṇāpatha, Paścāddeśa, Uttarāpatha and Madhyadeśa. 1. Pūrvadeśa The region lying east of Vārānasi is called Pūrvadeśa. It has the janapadas of Aṅga, Kaliṅga, Kosala, Tosala, Utkala, Magadha, Mudgara, Videha, Nepāla, Punḍra, Prāgjyotiṣa, Tāmraliptaka, Malada, Mallavartaka, Suhma and Brahmottara etc. 2. Dakśiṇāpatha The region lying south of Māhiṣmatī city or Narmadā River is called Dakśiṇāpatha. It consists of the janapadas of Maharashtra, Māhīṣaka, Aśmaka, Vidarbha, Kuntala, Krathakaiśika, Śūrpāraka, Kāñchi, Kerala, Kāvera, Murala, Vānavāsaka, Simhala, Chola, Dandaka, Pāndya, Pallava, Gānga, Nāsikya, Konkaṇa, Kollagiri and Vallāra, etc. 3. Paścāddeśa The region lying west beyond Devasabhā is called Paścāddeśa. It consists of the janapadas like Devasabhā, Surāṣṭra, Dāśeraka, Travana, Bhṛgukaccḥa, Kacchiya, Ānarta, Arbuda, Brāhmaṇavāha and Yavana etc. 4. Uttarāpatha The region lying north of Pṛthūdaka is called Uttarāpatha. It consists of the kingdoms like Śaka, Kekaya, Vokkāṇa, Hūṇa, Vānāyuja, Kāmboja, Bāhlīka, Pahlava, Limpāka, Kulūta, Kīra, Tangana, Tuṣāra, Turuṣka, Barbara, Hārahūṇa, Huhuka, Sahuda, Haṅsamārga, Rāmaṭha and Karakanṭha, etc. 5. Madhyadeśa Between these regions lies the Madhyadeśa. Apart from the history of janapadas as briefly discussed above, the chronology of Nepal, Tibet, Sri Lanka, and Burma is also integral part of the history of ancient India.
जो भी राजा हो जाता है वह क्षत्रिय संज्ञा पाता है चाहे पूर्व में वो किसी भी वर्ण से आता है। बाद में तो यह बहुत स्पष्ट ही हो गया कि जिस भी जाति ने आर्थिक व राजनीतिक शक्ति प्राप्त कर ली उसी को पुरोहित वर्ग द्वारा क्षत्रिय वर्ण घोषित कर दिया। राजपूत जाति का उदय भी उसी संकल्पना से समझा जा सकता है। अगली वार्ता में इस विषय पर प्रकाश डालने का अनुरोध है।
राजा तो और जातियों के भी रहें है लेकिन उन्हें समाज में कभी मान्यता नहीं मिली, उल्टा उन्हें हम निचा मानते हैं, मान्यता केवल राजपूतों को ही मिली, इसका स्पष्ट अर्थ है कि कहीं न कहीं राजपूत ही प्राचीन क्षत्रियों के वंशज हैं !
@@Bhatti_Saab_7773 nahi. Ye sab British ne caste censuses se ek nayi caste system hi bana di..vansha ka mahatva hai. Aur 1891 me toh Kai logon ko Kshatriya ki sangya di gayi hai. Poundra toh bengal ke ek region ke Kshatriyas hai.. British ne unko dalit bana diya. Bangal me kai kingdoms thenn waise alag alag
@@piyushjaiswal9283 Rajput too british logo ke aane se pehle bhi the... aur bhai agar vansho ka mahatva hai too Rajputo ke pass bhot se Prachin vansh hai... Bhati Raj Vansh 2000 saal se chal raha hai Sisodiya Raj Vansh 1500 saal se chal raha hai Chauhans Raj Vansh 1500 saal se chal raha hai Katoch Raj Vansh 2400 saal se chal raha hai... Aur bhai tu kaha Bangaliyo ko Kshatriya bana raha hai... Bangaliyo ki shakal dekh Bhai aur Rajputo ko dekh... Kitne well built hote hai.
@@Bhatti_Saab_7773 bhai Bengali me kuch vishesh jaatiyan kshatriya vansh ki hi hain. Aise. Magadh ke haraynaka dynasty ke descendants... Rajwar jaati ke log hain
Magadh ki aaj ki halat dekh kar bada afsos hota hai. Bharat me punching bags bang gaye hai modern Biharis and Eastern UP wale. Jo chahe mu utha kar kuch bhi bol deta hai Bhojpuri, Magahi bhashit logo ke bare me aur hum as a community hai bhi nahi, to khud ko defend bhi nahi karte.
That's because Biharis and UPites coming from the centre of the Indian civilisation don't have sub-nationalism in their heads. They identify themselves with India and don't consider them to be anything else other than being an Indian. Most of the other states' people have some sort of sub-nationalism too in their minds before calling themselves an Indian.
@@Samudra121 Yes I have pondered this too and one of the reasons for it IMO is that we accepted Hindi as our mother tongue or official language unquestioningly at the time of independence. When infact languages from the region are just as distinct from Hindi as say Punjabi or Bengali is from Hindi. Similar but quite different too. No Hindi speaker from Mumbai or Delhi can understand 'thet' Bhojpuri from my village for example.
@@Samudra121 Another fuel for sub regionalism in a state like MH is obviously immigration. People have to leave Bihar and UP for employment and education not come there. No wonder the us vs them thing isnt there.
1:19:40 *Cyrus the Great* sent an expedition to the Gedrosian desert between *_545 and 540 BCE_* (modern-day western Balochistan) and according to Herodotus, that expedition failed because of supply and other various issues ranging from weather to an unexplored area.
British history what he says. But timeline of mahajanpad kaal is very inaccurate because jarasandh was a very powerful king of magadh in mahabharat kaal and british historian also claim that magadh became strong in jarasandh rule. But the history is very much distorted .
"Magadha was a region and one of the sixteen Mahajanapadas, 'Great Kingdoms' of the Second Urbanization (600-200 BCE) in what is now south Bihar (before expansion) at the eastern Ganges Plain. Magadha was ruled by Brihadratha dynasty, Pradyota dynasty (682-544 BCE), Haryanka dynasty (544-413 BCE), the Shaishunaga dynasty (413-345 BCE) and the Mauryan dynasty by the end of it. " Before developing in to Mahajanapda, it might have existed as relatively smaller janapada even before that. Dynasties fall and rise. Boundaries change but area must have had a name and system to become mahajanpada.
@@nirmalchandrabiswas6403 Maybe. I quoted from wiki. Fee free to recheck from the book it referenced to, i.e. Keny, Liladhar (1943). ""THE SUPPOSED IDENTIFICATION OF UDAYANA OF KAUŚĀMBI WITH UDAYIN OF MAGADHA"". Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute. 24 (1/2): 60-66. JSTOR 41784405. What is it according to you and source reference?
@@AJAYSINGH-ns1vv The earliest known king of Magadha is Brihadratha. The name of Brihadratha appears in Rig-Veda (I.36.18, X.49.6). Magadha is too mentioned in Atharvaveda.[4] The puranic sources say that Brihadrath was the eldest son of Uparichara Vasu. -wikipedia reference book Gopal, Madan (1990). K.S. Gautam (ed.). India through the ages. Publication Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India. p. 80.
बहुत अच्छी तरह से वर्णन किया (कहानी की तरह बना दिया इतिहास जैसे नीरस विषय को)। कुछ तथ्य स्पष्ट करने से अलग-अलग दृष्टिकोणो को समझने में मदद मिलती। जैसे दो रेफरेंस दिए जा रहे हैं। बुद्धिस्ट साहित्य और पौराणिक साहित्य का यदि काल बता दिया जाता तो दृष्टिकोणो की तुलना करना अधिक बुद्धिगम्य होता।
I have heard arguments that Sri Krsna organized the Mahabharata war to stop the Magadh takeover. He depicted Kamsa as a Jarasandha proxy in the Yadu clan, trying to get a strategic position against the Kurus, who were impervious, protected by Bhishma. And again many of those who sided with Duryodhana were among those siding with the rising Magadha threat.
I am watching his videos from 1 year, yeah subscribers, watch time is not in match with other history channels but other history channels talked mainly about great wars, warrior, or great king etc but no one answer lifestyle, trade, soilders, army structure, feudalism, democracy, ancient cities , , tax system, mercenaries, Persian attack , huns sycthian attacks on india which this person does
Q1 - As per this person, if the population started moving towards Ganga, after Saraswati started drying up - How come Sri Ram existed in Ganga Planes with Janak and other kingdoms before 2k years of Mahabharat where mention of Saraswati is there, means the Saraswati was flowing. ?
@@rahultiwari-dx8qo Konsa Mythology? Kis duniya me hai ? Ramayan ke hone ke hundreds of proofs mil chuke hai . Par tum jaise Maccole Putra usko myth hi manoge .
@@rahultiwari-dx8qo Not your fault. Aise chutiye so called Historians ko follow Karoge to yahi hoga. Go and check works of Dr. Nilesh Oak and Rajiv Ranjan Prasad.
@@dhruveshsureshrathi8462 arey madar ..t kya facts Sri Ram ji ke ayodhya ka koi Avsesh mila hai yaa jaise Dwarka ko discover Kiya kya woh Mila yaa Rath ke Avsesh mile ek pull mila tha nasa ke satellite pe vo bhi 7,00,000 saal purana..jhooth bolega harami
7:53 Strongly disagree. Many Students learn history only till Class X. If interpretations are not told then children will start believing things as gospel truth.
Biggest gap in this explanation of Varna is its misunderstanding as hereditary but it's just a classification of the nature of work. Every individual performs different tasks with specific Varna characteristics with prominence of one due to time we dedicate for it. While more one progresses in unifying it within oneself is what we call yoga.
Your interpretation of Cast or Verna is wrong. In South Most of the kings are from so called 4th Verna, but they married with other Verna, it all depends on circumstances. nothing fixed like like antinational historians. Feel sorry for your understand when u are from JNU it is obvious.
One request to you, hope you find time for that. 1. Das Rajanya episode ( any tangible information about the internal disagreement - conflict between the Rigvedic tribes which drove the parashu s / parshab s to further west) and evolution of Indic inscriptions ( from sruti-smriti to inscriptions whether pictorial or phonetic, then evolution of scripts - like kharosti -brahmi- sharda etc. and where does pali / prakrit fit in ? linguistic automaton). 🙏
Shukriya aaj meri 7 saal ki history aab complete hogai apki wajah se me yutube channels apka special shukriya krunga kiyu ki apki wajah se me sampuran hogya jaise 16 kala sampuran hote hai esha mehsoos ho raha hai abh bataunga bharat k mullo ko bharat sanskriti ki real civilization jai hindutva 🙏🏻🚩
although Jay shows the Gupta Empire as small in his videos, claiming he has no archaeological evidence to show otherwise, shows the Sassanians as having conquered Sindh and Gandhar, despite having no archaeological evidence.
@@randomturd1415 they existed as a sub kingdom, and for only over a century, that too in Gandhar. Sassanids existed for much longer after that. Show me archaeological proof like rock reliefs, art, coinage proving long term mainstream Sassanid dominance in Sindh and Gandhar.
@ 17:00 why most Indian don’t recognize the fact that Parthians, people that came with Indo Greeks, Scythians, Kushans, even Hun belonged to Deva sect of Aryans. There were Asur in power at same time also but base of all these empires followed Devas. Same as Indian Brahmins. First coins of Hindu Gods were not minted in India rather minted in Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, East Iran and Turkmenistan. It should be clear they were not threat to Brahminical system. Now we have Bactrian manuscript which invokes Ram to validate a agreement. There is no Ram archeology in India. Vasudeva coins started before Kushans ever entered Gangatic areas. These are solid proofs that if anything so-called invaders boosted Brahmanism
@@anahita934 tere Budh to aap Saka muni hai. Saka logo ka Sadhu. Saka vi invaders hi hai. Go eat gobar. Tumara jahan kush nahi. Sab Aryans ka diya hua hai
@@anahita934 vedeshio ke god le liye. Un se र, श, क्षेत्र, ज्ञ le liya. Tumare khoon mein 20 se 40% videshio ke beej hai. Vedeshi nikal do to Andaman ke advasi ke ande hi reh jayenge. Baccha School jao achi parahi karo kisi videsh mein nokri mil jayge. Nahi to rail patri par tatti karne layk hi rahoge
@@uprightwalkingape3483 sabit kar camel mutra peene wale ki videshiyon ke God le liye???sabit jar ki pali se sanskrit bani??Ye tum logo ki gappe truth nahi hai.. Theories ko chhor ke evidence provide karo phir aana gyan dene.
@@gujjewman96 तो phd कर रहा है तो क्या मतलब वो संपूर्ण ज्ञानी हो गया... आप लोगो डिग्री छोर ज्ञान को प्राथमिकता दे नहीं तो जीवन भार सत्य को नहीं पा सकते।
Jay Vardhan ji you mentioned about Arayan Migration theory being endorsed in all modern historical books. Do you endorse the same in light of Rakhigarhi which already demolished the same coupled with recent findings of Rath in UP?
@@rishavkumar1250 demolished ho chuka hai...aajkal foreign researchers bhi manne lage hai iss bat ko. Vaad ka hi iss topic pe ek interview hai iss mamle me ek archeologist ka, Maharashtrian hai wo vyakti. Dekhiye wo wala video.
@@dineshsharma6125 mandal politics in UP and Bihar and CPI rule in Bengal destroyed economic wealth of eastern corridor while the rest of the parts took off after 1991 reforms and we were doing agrda pichda politics.
भारतीय इतिहासकारों को एक विशेष मोतियाबिंद हो रखा है जिसमें 6 वी शदी ईसा पूर्व से पुराना इतिहास नहीं दिखता। - वेदवीर आर्य कृपया वेदवीर आर्या जी द्वारा सुझाए गए कालक्रम पर भी टिप्पणी का अनुरोध है।🙏
I wanted to ask you one question, what was spoken language used in Mahavir and Buddha period? was it Brahmi or Prakrit or Sanskrit? If Sanskrit then it was gradually reduced due to rise of foreign languages brought by Parsian, Hun and Khushaan invasion.
Not worth. It would've been more interesting if Arihant contested his points or at least put forward new findings which puncture many old theories. If one had to listen to this guy's lecture, it is already available on his channel. This podcast seems like an opportunity lost.
He is studying history from the lens of outsider and it is taught like that in India. Unless you change the discourse academically, you will always produce people like him. He also can't help because this is how history is being taught in college
@@dineshsharma6125 Nope, he has a strong grasp of Emic viewpoints but successfully adapts to standards of International scholarly history which other Indians, typically Nationalists, do a terrible job of doing.
Jay ji जिसे आप एकारथ कह रहे हैं(कदाचित अंग्रेजी में देखकर), वह वस्तुतः 'एकराट्' है। राट् शब्द राजा का बोधक है और एकराट् का अर्थ है एकमात्र शासक। जैसे सम्राट का अर्थ है सम् अर्थात सम्यक अथवा पूर्ण राजा।
गुप्त शासक गंगा घाटी के सैनिक ब्राह्मण थे जिन्होंने देश की रक्षा प्राचीन काल से की है। सिकंदर पराजित हुआ था पंजाब के में महीहार ब्राह्मणों से जो कालांतर में मोहियाल ब्राह्मण के रुप में जाने गए। इन्हीं सैनिक ब्राह्मणों ने भारत का इस्लामीकरण नहीं होने दिया। इनकी एक शाखा जो दिल्ली के आस पास हरियाणा, पंजाब, उत्तर प्रदेश एवं राजस्थान में रहते थे, उन्होंने बहुत दिनों तक मुस्लिम आक्रांताओं का प्रतिरोध किया। बिहार में गंगा घाटी के सैनिक ब्राह्मण जो भूमिहार ब्राह्मण के नाम से जाने जाते हैं, ने प्रतिरोध किया। इस क्रम में बनारस के भूमिहार ब्राह्मण शासक ने काशी को मुस्लिमों से मुक्त कराया। बनारस के भूमिहार ब्राह्मण शासकों ने ही अयोध्या एवं मथुरा में मंदिर की भूमि क्रय कर मंदिरों का निर्माण करवाया। बिहार के ही हथुआ राज, बेतिया राज एवं अन्य कई भूमिहार ब्राह्मणों ने बहुत ही प्रतिरोध करते हुए हिंदू धर्म को नष्ट होने से बचाया। गंगा घाटी में मंदिरों के नष्ट होने के पश्चात गांव गांव में ठाकुरबाड़ी एवं मठों की स्थापना हुई जो हिंदू धर्म के केंद्र थे। इन भूमिहार ब्राह्मणों का पूर्ण योगदान समयाभाव एवं स्थानाभाव के कारण वर्णित करना संभव नहीं है।
Magadh empire was founded by Jarasandha. But his grandson somadhi became emperor after last king of Pandavas. Magadh became empire after 150 years of Mahabharath.
Mai sabhi dosto se bus ye bolna chahta hoon History padhkar apas me na lade bus present me sabse milkar desh ko aage badahye🥰🙏🙏🙏🏻♥️💖 kyounki History me sab ek dusre se ladte they kyounki ki kingdom hua krta tha esliye to Democracy ki jarurat padi💖💖♥️🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🙏🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
that Time Brahmins were shatriya and shatriya were Brahmins. They have same Gotras and DNAs mostly . and there are thousands of Intermarriages mentioned in vedas and earlier History .
At 34:33, it should be Munger, not Champaran.
Been watching ur videos for a year I think love ur videos
Keep it up
Dude, I can observe so many prejudices while you narrate your information.
If you wanna be a historian then work on your way of delivering information.
I won't pronounce any particular point when I observed you are under influence of your prejudices since your brain will trick you into providing some argument for that which you will find the logical rational conclusion.
I wish someday you will be a historian if you are aspiring to be One.
One of the Honest Historian I have your see......
Sorry to say it seems that your work is based on same existing works of Historians many of whom used their political agenda to distort history.
#There are so many scientific evidences coming against AMT. Why don't you invite some of those researchers and debates with them on those points, like Genetics, linguistics,textual,etc.? There is a mathematical model also against it.
On origin of Mauryan and Guptas also there seems to be Unnecessary confusion.
Do remember that Buddhist Religious texts are full of Hindu hatered and so this point must be considered while using their text for Historical study.
Hi Jay Vardhan Good to see you on Vaad, I have been following you from quite sometime on your own channel. Good to see you are here.👏👏👏
I HAVE taught History for 40 years with a PhD in History and retired as a Professor of History in a Central University and I commend Shri Jay Vardhan Singh for his deep knowledge and grasp over Historiography. He is keeping Indian History alive after a 40 year drought.
Pls name your university, where u taught.
Glad to see jay vardhan bhai on this podcast.. I follow him on youtube and twitter.. Underrated history youtuber
आपको इस लड़के को अक्सर शो में लाना चाहिए
That is why when talking about history, one must always keep the following phrases in mind :
1. "out of the sites excavated TILL NOW."
2. "Schools of Thought."
3. "Interpretation."
A very underrated historian for sure!
Hope he gets tremendous success!
Yeh banda koi bohat naya khoj nahi kar rahe hain. Yeh joh available writings hain jiss mein Marxist views dominate kartein numbers ke hisab se, ussi ke basis pe apni study kar rahe hain.
Aryan Migration ke time pe yeh kese muskara raha hain dekha?
Aryan Migration theory ke against itne scientific evidences hain, genetics se leke archaeological tak,ki ab bhi woh agar ussko History mein phadhya jara hain toh woh sivayein political conspiracy ke aur kuch nahi kaha jaasakta.
Maurya kshatriya hotein toh unnko Maghadh ke capture ke samayein magadh ke Brahmano ka virodh naa jhelna padta. Yeh fact koi deny nahi karsakta.
Exact kya origin hain yeh pata nahi lekin Maurya lower origin ke teh yeh general consensus hain.
Aur Chandra Gupta Maurya toh vedic religion hi follow kar rahe teh.
Ashok ke time se Buddhism pe zor diya.
Buddhist religion text shuru se Hindu hate aur Hindu phobia se grasit rahe hain.. toh unki historical literature mein woh point humshea rahe ga yeh point clear rehna chahiyein.
Aur ganga ke pass dimonds ka kabhi koi evidence nahi raha...lol
Gupta kings kushan ke vassals ke tod pe hi shuru huwe teh aur woh Merchants teh joh land lords ki tarah bane..jaha se kings bane.
Marriage wala arguments toh unnpe bhi lagu hota hain.
@@chandra_himanshu aryan theory sahi hai
@@sohamshinde7978 accha😂😂😂😂
@@vimdhayakjigulambipurwale4536 ha
@@sohamshinde7978
Bakwas.
All u can say is EVERYBODY is migrated to India.
That doesn’t mean somebody else brought Indian Culture and Civilisation.
48:33 Awanti has two capitals Northern capital Was Ujjaini and Southern Capital was Mahishmati Present day Maheshwar. Maheshwar was capital of Hehaiya King Sahtrarjun. An ancient temple of Sahtrarjun also here.
Following him since 2 years already happy to see him here. He and @HistoryGuru are my fav
Amazing podcast with rare great content.This type of content is what I call ancient Indian history.Jay Vardhan Singh Sir has done an amazing job by doing reasearch about this topic,this podcast deserves at least 10 million views ❤❤❤👍👍👍
History is like: iska yeh kehna hai, uska woh kehna hai, par bahar wala yeh kehta hai 🤣
Right
Correct
Bilkul sahi
Khel gye guru😂🎉
Aur hum ghulam mind wale log bahari logo ko baat pahle rakhte 😂🤣🤣🤣😁
I watched his " Kharavela " Episode..... It was enlighting, cleared my doubts.
Finally. I didn't expect him to be sure. Great job ! One of my favourite historians online.
Bhai he is a pseudo-secular & eurocentric historian. Doesn't read a single academics outside of the missionary academia. Even the basic chronology of Bharatiya history he uses is so flawed.
Furthermore, Greece was the real oligarchic slave state which is attested in their own texts. Socrates, born in an aristocratic family, hated democracy!
But he have his source from Rc majumdar
To bhai reason to de apni baat ka...
How does Socrates hating democracy supports your claim that there was no democracy in Greek city-states?
कहने का अर्थ यह कि पढ़ाये जाने वाले इतिहास का अधिकतर भाग केवल कुछ लोगों का विचार भर है। हमें facts की जगह opinion पढ़ाया जाता है।
Not opinion but Narrative
और इसी के आधार पर हम भारत से प्यार भी करते हैं और संस्कृति से नफरत भी करते हैं
Arihant Bhai aur aise history, culture, civilization se related podcasts lao
Aur ek request please 🙏
Annamalai ko bulane ka try karo and talk to him not only about Tamilnadu politics but also his life, his views on culture, history, Hindutva, Bharat,etc
That will be bad for his political career
@@akkkkk813 how so ?
@@dwight2762 do you know that all the left is politician, media, and historians call themselves and try to show them self as secular and unbiased where we Hindus are so much stupid that we proudly say that we are from right wing and that's why we lose our race for the long run
Bring AnnaMalai, and talk about his vision about India and TN. What issues he sees and how he plans to resolve? also ask him what keeps him going and why he wear expensive ⌚watches.
@@dineshsharma6125 why shouldnt he wear expensive watches?
if he has the money
he will buy it
also, this was answered in his episode with ANI news
Traditionally, the Jambūdvīpa (Indian subcontinent) had many territorial kingdoms since early Rigvedic era. These territorial kingdoms gradually led to the development of territorial political identities and regional communities which came to be known as janapadas. Some of these janapadas had politically dominated over the neighbouring janapadas for a long period and came to be known as Mahājanapadas. Rigveda mentions Purus, Bharatas, Turvaśas, Yadus, Anus and Druhyus. Yajurveda has the reference of Magadha. Atharvaveda mentions Aṅga, Magadha, Gāndhāra and Mujavat kingdoms or janapadas. Numerous janapadas are found mentioned in texts like Aitareya, Śatapatha, Purāṇas, Rāmāyana, and Mahābhārata, etc. The Indian subcontinent was broadly divided into sixteen Mahājanapadas after Mahābhārata era.
According to early Buddhist sources like Aṅguttara Nikāya of Sutta Piṭaka, Aṅga, Magadha, Kāshi, Kosala, Vajji, Malla, Chedi, Vatsa, Kuru, Pāñchāla, Matsya, Śūrasena, Aśmaka, Avanti, Gāndhāra and Kāmboja(Bāhlika) were the sixteen Mahājanapadas. Dirgha Nikāya refers to six pairs of Mahājanapadas of Uttarāpatha, namely, Aṅga-Magadha, Kāshi-Kosala, Vajji-Malla, Chedi-Vatsa, Kuru-Pāñchāla and Matsya-Śūrasena. In ancient times, the region north of Narmadā River was known as Uttarāpatha whereas the region south of Narmadā River was known as Dakśiṇāpatha. Seemingly, Dirgha Nikāya did not mention the Avanti-Aśmaka janapadas of Dakśiṇāpatha and the Gāndhāra-Kāmboja janapadas of north-western India. Thus, there were mainly sixteen janapadas. Chullaniddeśa mentions another Mahājanapada named Kaliṅga and also substitute Yona or Yavana
for Gāndhāra. Post decline of Aśmakas during the reign of Nanda dynasty of Magadha, Kaliṅga also emerged as a Mahājanapada. Since the Yavanas occupied and reigned over the Gāndhāra region around 1800-1200 BCE, which also came to be known as Yavana Mahājanapada. Śivi, Daśārṇa, Sindhu, Sauvīra, Kāshmira, Paurava, Vaṅga, Paunḍra and Kāmarūpa were also important janapadas.
The Kosala Mahājanapada of Ikśvāku kings dominated over north India during the period of Tretā Yuga (6777-5577 BCE) and the first half of Dvāpara Yuga (5577-4377 BCE) whereas the Kuru Mahājanapada of
Kuru kings dominated over north India during the Mahābhārata era. The Magadha Mahājanapada emerged as a major political power after Mahābhārata era.
श्रीमान जी त्रेता और द्वापर युग (राम और महाभारत) का जो कालखण्ड आप बता रहे हैं उस समय का कोई उत्खनन प्रमाण प्राप्त नहीं हो रहा है जबकि रामायण, महाभारत ग्रंथों में उनके महान नगरों का वर्णन आता है। इससे संदेह पैदा होता है। पुरातत्वविद श्री बीबी लाल के नेतृत्व में महाभारत और रामायण कालीन स्थलों का उत्खनन कराया गया। किसी भी स्थल पर 700-800 बीसी से पुराने मानव बस्ती का प्रमाण नही मिलते। कृपया प्रतिक्रिया दें।
@@jagbirsinghmann1966
Can Sinauli burials be non-Vedic?
Some analysts are dismissing Sinauli as un related to Vedic culture or Samskṛtī because the people are buried instead of cremated. It is sure cremation is popular in Sanātana Dharma, but burials are also present in our tradition. Burials are also mentioned in Ṛgveda as one of the ways in which the dead individuals are treated, as we have already seen. Another doubt that has arisen is due to the design of the head-gears. The head-gear of some of the warriors contains horns. In the current depictions of our ancient people, the horned-headgear is associated with the Daityas and the Dānavas. It will be misleading to conclude that Sinauli is non-Vedic based on these factors alone.
The Bharatas and their ancestors were an admixture of the Ādityas, the Daityas and the Dānavas.
The ancestral king Yayāti had two wives Devayāni and Ṡarmiṣthā. Devayāni, is the daughter of Daitya Guru Ṡukrāchārya. She is the mother of Yadu and Turvaṡa, the eldest sons of Yayāti. Ṡarmiṣthā is the daughter of the Daitya king Vṛṣaparvā. She is the mother of Anu, Druhyu and Pūru, the younger sons of Yayāti.
The mother of all the Yadavas is Devayāni and the mother of Pūru, the founder of the Pūru dynasty is Ṡarmiṣthā, both Daitya women. The Bharatas descended from the Pūrus and the Kurus like the Pāndavas and Kauravas descended from the Bharatas. Kṛṣṇa, Balarāma and other Vṛṣnis descended from the Yadavas. The Dānavas like Maya were allies of the Paṇḍavas who gave them many weapons and chariots.
The chariot of Arjuna came from Varuṇa, who is revered by the Bhargava sages like the Asura Guru Sukrachārya and by the sages in the lineage of Vasiṣṭha and Agastya. Vasiṣṭha was the priest of Sri Rama. Vyasa was the descendant of Vasiṣṭha and the grandfather and guide of the Paṇḍavas.
The Ṛgveda mentions many wars and the Purāṇas render them as the wars between the Devas and the Asuras. But if we analyse the Ṛgveda closely, these wars are fought between the people who worship Indra (like the Purus and the Bharatas) and the other people who don't worship Indra (like the Anus and the Druhyus). The Purāṇas portrayed the people who do not worship Indra as the Asuras, categorizing them as Daityas and Dānavas. The word used by Ṛgveda for the non-Indra worshipers is anindra (those who are without Indra) and avrata (those who don't have any devotion to Indra). The Sinauli settlement with their burial practices and horned head-gears can as well belong to the groups affiliated to the Daitya-Dānavas like Maya Dānava.
But this doesn't make them non-Vedic, because Dānavas like Maya do have a place in our Veda, Itihasa Purāṇas.
The Analysis of the Place Names
The place Sinauli falls in the Kuru Rāṣtra, or the Kuru Janapada, the region between Ganga in the east and Sarasvati in the west and divided by Yamuna into two parts. A place named after Maya viz. Mayastali or Mayarāṣtra (Meerut, 52 km away) is close to Sinauli. The places mentioned in the Mahābhārata like the Vyāghra-prasta (Baghpat, 25 km away), Svarna-prasta (Sonipat, 29 km away), Paniprasta (35 km away), Varanavati (21 km away) are close to Sinauli. Hastinapura is 75 km to the east and Indraprasta is 55 km to the south of Sinauli. Paruṡurāma Kṣetra (now Alamgirpur, the eastern most Harappan settlement, 3300-1300 BCE) is 33 km away from Sinauli, where Paruṡurāma taught weaponry to Bhīṣma. The region around Sinauli is dotted with places resembling chariot construction such as Rathora (Rathakāra - chariot-maker, 6 km away) and Luhara (Lohakāra - metal worker, 2 km away).
The name Sinauli is likely a derived form of Sina-sthali, similar to the other place-names in Kuru Rashtra ending with the suffix 'sthali' (meaning - a place) like Bastali (Vyasa-sthali), Bamanauli (Brahmana-sthali). The place names in Kuru Rashtra, contains suffixes like Prasta, Sthali and Kṣetra. The word 'sina' means a 'store’, 'garment' 'fetter', 'bond', 'body' etc, implying that it is one of the places associated with making chariots and weapons. Probably the people who lived in this Sinauli settlement were a warrior class of men and women supplying weapons to the army of the kings.
Sinauli and the Kurukṣetra War
Whether the warriors buried in the Sinauli burials participated in the Kurukṣetra War as one among the many small military units, depends on the chosen date of the Kurukṣetra War. Sinauli excavations are dated to 2100 BCE to 1900 BCE.
One of the Kurukṣetra War dates close to it is 1793 BCE proposed by Shri Ashok Bhatnagar. If we take this Kurukṣetra War as the basis, then the Sinauli warriors were 100 to 300 years older to the Kurukṣetra War, placing them as part of the late Ṛgvedic period, during the formative periods of the 1st, 5th, 8th, 9th or the 10th Maṇḍalas, especially the 10th Maṇḍala. Several battles are mentioned in these Maṇḍalas too, like in the older Maṇḍalas. With the Kurukṣetra War date at 1793 BCE, we can date Samtanu mentioned in the 10th Maṇḍala of Ṛgveda to around 1930 BCE. Samtanu is the youngest king in the lineage of the Bharata kings mentioned in the Ṛgveda, who also appear as the ancestors of the Pāṇḍavas and the Kauravas who waged the Kurukṣetra War.
In the linage of kings leading to the Pāṇḍavas, the Ṛgveda stops at Samtanu. In the linage of sages leading to Vyāsa, the Ṛgveda stops at Parāṡara. Samtanu’s son Vicitravīrya and Parāṡara’s son Vyāsa is in the future of Ṛgveda. Dhṛtarāṣtra and Pāṇdu are the next generation of Vicitravīrya and Vyāsa. The Kauravas and the Pāṇḍavas who took place in the Kurukṣetra War are in the next generation of Dhṛtarāṣtra and Pāṇdu. Thus, this date 1793 BCE corroborates well with our analysis that the chariot and the Sinauli burial sites belong to the 10th Maṇḍala funeral hymns which speaks about the burials.
Another date of Kurukṣetra War 1952 BCE is from Shri Mohan Gupta. If we follow this date, then this settlement falls right in the Kurukṣetra War period. The 3K Kurukṣetra War dates of Shri Vedaveer Arya (3162 BCE) and Manish Pandit (3067 BCE) will make the settlement well into the future of the lifetime of the Kuru-Paṇḍavas during the lifetime of their descendants named in the Purāṇas like Viṣṇu Purāṇa. There is another date by Shri KK Ramamurthy at 1504 BCE and RN Iyengar at 1478 BCE which will make this settlement part of the middle Ṛgvedic period of Maṇḍala 2 and 4, closer to the lifetime of the sages like Gr̥tsamada and kings like Sahadeva and Somaka or even to the early period of Maṇḍala 6, 3 and 7, closer to the lifetime of the kings like Sudās and Divodāsa depending upon the variability in the chronology of the Maṇḍala wise evolution of the Ṛgveda.
@@nirmalchandrabiswas6403 शव को दफनाना भी एक धार्मिक मान्य विधि थी। आज भी कुछ हिन्दु और सन्यासी तो लगभग सभी शव को दबाते और समाधि देते हैं। बच्चों के शवों को भी दफनाया जाता है। दबाना या जलाना किसी धर्म विशेष की एकमात्र शव निस्तारण विधि नहीं है।
@@jagbirsinghmann1966 prepared for the burial rituals as a sub category of the Soma carts corresponding to the 10th Maṇḍala burial related hymns.
A possible Ṛgvedic Connection
The Ṛgvedic hymn 15 in the 10th Maṇḍala speaks about both burying the dead (anagni-dagdha) and cremating them (agni-dagdha). The hymn 18 of the 10th Maṇḍala talks about a burial house (gṛha) often compared to a womb (yoni) where ghee (clarified butter) is kept in pots. This matches with the 116 burial houses unearthed at Sinauli. They contain many earthen pots which could have been used to fill offerings like ghee, butter and medicines. The Ṛgvedic hymn 18 of the 10th Maṇḍala mentions about taking the bow from the hand of the dead. The bow of the warrior taken from his hand is placed beside the dead-body of the warriors in Sinauli. Along with the bow, other weapons of the warrior like the shields and swords are kept. Their chariots too are kept in the burial house.
A pair of chariots are seen in one of the Sinauli burial house possibly belonging to a king or a chief. This is close to the descriptions of the pair of Soma Carts mentioned in the Ṛgveda (Hymn 13 of the 10th Maṇḍala). One of them represents mortality (Yamayāna) and another immortality (Devayāna). The pair, Yama and Yami, are the overseers of death since Yama, the son of Vivasvat, chose mortality instead of immortality and hence is the first mortal. The hymn compares the deceased with Yama and Yami pair and urges them to choose mortality instead of immortality for the sake of the devatas and for the sake of their offspring. The hymn talks about the five steps (pañca padāni) to climb the mount (rupa) and to ascend the four-legged bed (Catuṣpadī) as per the ritual injunctions. These four-legged death beds or coffins, where the dead body is placed are found in the Sinauli burials. The mount mentioned in the verse may be referring to the burial mounts.
The Ṛgveda 10th Maṇḍala hymn 15 also talks about ritual offerings of Soma, butter and ghee (clarified butter) to the forefathers inside the burial house. The ritual pots found inside the Sinauli burials indicate offerings made to these forefathers. Thus, the Sinauli burial sites resemble very closely with the descriptions of the funeral hymns in the 10th Maṇḍala of Ṛgveda.
Some individuals are mentioned in the Ṛgveda Anukramaṇi (as authors of hymns) with the suffix Yāmāyana indicating that they are deceased with some significant death ceremonies given for them. Śaṅkha Yāmāyana (RV 10.15), Damana Yāmāyana (RV 10.16), Devaśravas Yāmāyana (RV 10.17), Saṃkusuka Yāmāyana (RV 10.18), Mathita Yāmāyana (RV 10.19), Kumāra Yāmāyana (RV 10.135) and Ūrdhvakr̥śana Yāmāyana (RV 10.144). The name of the king or chief who is buried with the two chariots in the Sinauli burial site, could be any of these names. Kumāra and Ūrdhvakr̥śana are not directly related to the funeral though related to death. Devaśravas is an ancient king ancestral to Divodāsa and ancient than the oldest Maṇḍalas like 3, 7 and 6 and hence can be excluded. Mathita too can be excluded as the narrative is not close to funerals but to cows. Damana is cremated instead of buried as the corresponding hymn (RV 10.16) urges the fire (Agni) to be gentle with his body as it burns. The hymn of Śaṅkha too leans towards cremation.
Saṃkusuka is surely buried as indicated by the corresponding hymn (RV 10.18). Hence this burial with two chariots could as well be that of Saṃkusuka. The hymn urges the earth to be gentle, be soft as wool, to his body as he is buried.
उप सर्प मातरम् भूमिम् एताम् उरुव्यचसम् पृथिवीं सुशेवाम् |
ऊर्णम्रदा युवतिर् दक्षिणावत एषा त्वा पातु निरृतेर् उपस्थात् ||
And from where did you came to this conclusion that 6000 years back was treta yug are you delusional or what
I am regular viewer of Jay vardhan sigh, have watched all video
I know this guy. I started following his work/ channel when he had a small base. Call it my personal bias, stopped watching him after knowing the faact that he is a social science student from JNU. Arihant, you will make me follow his work again. I hope Jay's work actually tells us History and not Left Distory
Here, I would like to clarify here, that I am an academic student of History and what I am referring to here is "INTERPRETATION"
@@abhinavghosheven a statement of history coming from JNU is suspect.
@@abhinavghosh in fact even he himself believe in Aryan migration theory
Pata hai yee kahan ka hai?. Yee bangali hai
So just because he is from JNU you stopped watching him. This says a lot about you not him.
History of India in the Iron age is marvellous, its absolutely shameful that it is not taught on a large scale and with great fervour in our educational institutes.
1:24:45 - Tree which is talking about is known as SEEMAL. Today also pillows of SEEMAL cotton is made for infants because of its softness.
1:19:44 which battle he is talking about? Can U tell if U know?
He is from JNU, could be student of Romila Thapar,. We should believe him really? Every one must keep suspicion.
No he's trustworthy,
I saw one guy expressing buddha to be older than krishna in his cmnt section but he shut him up with evidences.
Right. That's why I don't pay taxes as FM is from JNU.
Great podcast. Jay Vardhan knowledge in Ancient History is awesome. I wish we had more sources to study Ancient History just like we have for Mediaeval History.
Yeh banda koi bohat naya khoj nahi kar rahe hain. Yeh joh available writings hain jiss mein Marxist views dominate kartein numbers ke hisab se, ussi ke basis pe apni study kar rahe hain.
Aryan Migration ke time pe yeh kese muskara raha hain dekha?
Aryan Migration theory ke against itne scientific evidences hain, genetics se leke archaeological tak,ki ab bhi woh agar ussko History mein phadhya jara hain toh woh sivayein political conspiracy ke aur kuch nahi kaha jaasakta.
Maurya kshatriya hotein toh unnko Maghadh ke capture ke samayein magadh ke Brahmano ka virodh naa jhelna padta. Yeh fact koi deny nahi karsakta.
Exact kya origin hain yeh pata nahi lekin Maurya lower origin ke teh yeh general consensus hain.
Aur Chandra Gupta Maurya toh vedic religion hi follow kar rahe teh.
Ashok ke time se Buddhism pe zor diya.
Buddhist religion text shuru se Hindu hate aur Hindu phobia se grasit rahe hain.. toh unki historical literature mein woh point humshea rahe ga yeh point clear rehna chahiyein.
Aur ganga ke pass dimonds ka kabhi koi evidence nahi raha...lol
Gupta kings kushan ke vassals ke tod pe hi shuru huwe teh aur woh Merchants teh joh land lords ki tarah bane..jaha se kings bane.
Marriage wala arguments toh unnpe bhi lagu hota hain.
@@chandra_himanshu Aryan migration is true
@@chandra_himanshu Marxist historians are thousand times better than dindu nationalist pipedream sellers. Only good hindu nationalist historians R C majumdar.
@@chandra_himanshu Maurya were Kshatriyas of purest clan ...the first mention of so called shudra origin comes in Mudraraksham which was written 600 year later by Brahmin lobby to undermine as Mauryan patronized budhhism
@@chandra_himanshu tune ek book ni padhi hai ..gawar sale 😂😂😂😂
Ancient Indian Geography as Described by Rājaśekhara (3rd century CE) Sanskrit poet Rājaśekhara was the teacher of Pratīhāra King Mahendrapāla.
He divided Āryavarta into five parts, Pūrvadeśa, Dakśiṇāpatha,
Paścāddeśa, Uttarāpatha and Madhyadeśa.
1. Pūrvadeśa The region lying east of Vārānasi is called Pūrvadeśa. It has the janapadas of Aṅga, Kaliṅga, Kosala, Tosala, Utkala, Magadha, Mudgara, Videha, Nepāla, Punḍra, Prāgjyotiṣa, Tāmraliptaka, Malada, Mallavartaka, Suhma and Brahmottara etc.
2. Dakśiṇāpatha The region lying south of Māhiṣmatī city or Narmadā River is called Dakśiṇāpatha. It consists of the janapadas of Maharashtra, Māhīṣaka, Aśmaka, Vidarbha, Kuntala, Krathakaiśika, Śūrpāraka, Kāñchi, Kerala, Kāvera, Murala, Vānavāsaka, Simhala, Chola, Dandaka, Pāndya, Pallava, Gānga, Nāsikya, Konkaṇa, Kollagiri and Vallāra, etc.
3. Paścāddeśa The region lying west beyond Devasabhā is called Paścāddeśa. It consists of the janapadas like Devasabhā, Surāṣṭra, Dāśeraka, Travana, Bhṛgukaccḥa, Kacchiya, Ānarta, Arbuda, Brāhmaṇavāha and Yavana etc.
4. Uttarāpatha The region lying north of Pṛthūdaka is called Uttarāpatha. It consists of the kingdoms like Śaka, Kekaya, Vokkāṇa, Hūṇa, Vānāyuja, Kāmboja, Bāhlīka, Pahlava, Limpāka, Kulūta, Kīra, Tangana, Tuṣāra, Turuṣka, Barbara, Hārahūṇa, Huhuka, Sahuda, Haṅsamārga, Rāmaṭha and
Karakanṭha, etc.
5. Madhyadeśa Between these regions lies the Madhyadeśa.
Apart from the history of janapadas as briefly discussed above, the chronology of Nepal, Tibet, Sri Lanka, and Burma is also integral part of the history of ancient India.
Bharatvanshi ko Jai Shree Ram 🚩
Where is region of Andhra in ancient times?
This guy really2 is knowledgeble when it comes to ancient history... i really like this guy
Very informative episode. Really appreciable.
beautiful. After a long time, I watched such a great presentation on ancient India which is devoid of biases and bigotry.
जो भी राजा हो जाता है वह क्षत्रिय संज्ञा पाता है चाहे पूर्व में वो किसी भी वर्ण से आता है। बाद में तो यह बहुत स्पष्ट ही हो गया कि जिस भी जाति ने आर्थिक व राजनीतिक शक्ति प्राप्त कर ली उसी को पुरोहित वर्ग द्वारा क्षत्रिय वर्ण घोषित कर दिया। राजपूत जाति का उदय भी उसी संकल्पना से समझा जा सकता है। अगली वार्ता में इस विषय पर प्रकाश डालने का अनुरोध है।
राजा तो और जातियों के भी रहें है लेकिन उन्हें समाज में कभी मान्यता नहीं मिली, उल्टा उन्हें हम निचा मानते हैं, मान्यता केवल राजपूतों को ही मिली, इसका स्पष्ट अर्थ है कि कहीं न कहीं राजपूत ही प्राचीन क्षत्रियों के वंशज हैं !
@@Bhatti_Saab_7773 nahi. Ye sab British ne caste censuses se ek nayi caste system hi bana di..vansha ka mahatva hai. Aur 1891 me toh Kai logon ko Kshatriya ki sangya di gayi hai.
Poundra toh bengal ke ek region ke Kshatriyas hai.. British ne unko dalit bana diya. Bangal me kai kingdoms thenn waise alag alag
@@piyushjaiswal9283 Rajput too british logo ke aane se pehle bhi the... aur bhai agar vansho ka mahatva hai too Rajputo ke pass bhot se Prachin vansh hai...
Bhati Raj Vansh 2000 saal se chal raha hai
Sisodiya Raj Vansh 1500 saal se chal raha hai
Chauhans Raj Vansh 1500 saal se chal raha hai
Katoch Raj Vansh 2400 saal se chal raha hai...
Aur bhai tu kaha Bangaliyo ko Kshatriya bana raha hai... Bangaliyo ki shakal dekh Bhai aur Rajputo ko dekh... Kitne well built hote hai.
@@Bhatti_Saab_7773 bhai Bengali me kuch vishesh jaatiyan kshatriya vansh ki hi hain.
Aise. Magadh ke haraynaka dynasty ke descendants... Rajwar jaati ke log hain
रामायण से जुने सवाल
Great as always 👍👍👍👍
Magadh ki aaj ki halat dekh kar bada afsos hota hai.
Bharat me punching bags bang gaye hai modern Biharis and Eastern UP wale. Jo chahe mu utha kar kuch bhi bol deta hai Bhojpuri, Magahi bhashit logo ke bare me aur hum as a community hai bhi nahi, to khud ko defend bhi nahi karte.
That's because Biharis and UPites coming from the centre of the Indian civilisation don't have sub-nationalism in their heads. They identify themselves with India and don't consider them to be anything else other than being an Indian. Most of the other states' people have some sort of sub-nationalism too in their minds before calling themselves an Indian.
@@Samudra121 Yes I have pondered this too and one of the reasons for it IMO is that we accepted Hindi as our mother tongue or official language unquestioningly at the time of independence.
When infact languages from the region are just as distinct from Hindi as say Punjabi or Bengali is from Hindi. Similar but quite different too. No Hindi speaker from Mumbai or Delhi can understand 'thet' Bhojpuri from my village for example.
@@Samudra121 Another fuel for sub regionalism in a state like MH is obviously immigration. People have to leave Bihar and UP for employment and education not come there. No wonder the us vs them thing isnt there.
1:19:40 *Cyrus the Great* sent an expedition to the Gedrosian desert between *_545 and 540 BCE_* (modern-day western Balochistan) and according to Herodotus, that expedition failed because of supply and other various issues ranging from weather to an unexplored area.
धन्यवाद बहुत ही ज्ञानवर्धक
British history what he says. But timeline of mahajanpad kaal is very inaccurate because jarasandh was a very powerful king of magadh in mahabharat kaal and british historian also claim that magadh became strong in jarasandh rule. But the history is very much distorted .
"Magadha was a region and one of the sixteen Mahajanapadas, 'Great Kingdoms' of the Second Urbanization (600-200 BCE) in what is now south Bihar (before expansion) at the eastern Ganges Plain. Magadha was ruled by Brihadratha dynasty, Pradyota dynasty (682-544 BCE), Haryanka dynasty (544-413 BCE), the Shaishunaga dynasty (413-345 BCE) and the Mauryan dynasty by the end of it. "
Before developing in to Mahajanapda, it might have existed as relatively smaller janapada even before that. Dynasties fall and rise. Boundaries change but area must have had a name and system to become mahajanpada.
@@thehawkseye3412 your timelines for the janapadas are totally false
@@nirmalchandrabiswas6403 Maybe. I quoted from wiki. Fee free to recheck from the book it referenced to, i.e. Keny, Liladhar (1943). ""THE SUPPOSED IDENTIFICATION OF UDAYANA OF KAUŚĀMBI WITH UDAYIN OF MAGADHA"". Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute. 24 (1/2): 60-66. JSTOR 41784405.
What is it according to you and source reference?
@@thehawkseye3412 who was father of brihdrath.
@@AJAYSINGH-ns1vv The earliest known king of Magadha is Brihadratha. The name of Brihadratha appears in Rig-Veda (I.36.18, X.49.6). Magadha is too mentioned in Atharvaveda.[4] The puranic sources say that Brihadrath was the eldest son of Uparichara Vasu. -wikipedia
reference book Gopal, Madan (1990). K.S. Gautam (ed.). India through the ages. Publication Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India. p. 80.
Sheer BRILLIANT . I have found another gem it seems.
This guys youtube channel is mindblowing.
"India ka apna podcast" 👍👍👍
Rise of Iron was definitely the reason for excessive warfare. Bronze age Sindhu - Saraswati, ancient Egypt and Elam were definitely more peaceful.
इस पीएचडी स्कॉलर को मैं दिल से शुभकामनाएं देता हूं। स्वस्थ और प्रसन्न रहो मेरे दोस्त।
बहुत अच्छी तरह से वर्णन किया (कहानी की तरह बना दिया इतिहास जैसे नीरस विषय को)। कुछ तथ्य स्पष्ट करने से अलग-अलग दृष्टिकोणो को समझने में मदद मिलती। जैसे दो रेफरेंस दिए जा रहे हैं। बुद्धिस्ट साहित्य और पौराणिक साहित्य का यदि काल बता दिया जाता तो दृष्टिकोणो की तुलना करना अधिक बुद्धिगम्य होता।
I have heard arguments that Sri Krsna organized the Mahabharata war to stop the Magadh takeover.
He depicted Kamsa as a Jarasandha proxy in the Yadu clan, trying to get a strategic position against the Kurus, who were impervious, protected by Bhishma. And again many of those who sided with Duryodhana were among those siding with the rising Magadha threat.
I am watching his videos from 1 year, yeah subscribers, watch time is not in match with other history channels but other history channels talked mainly about great wars, warrior, or great king etc but no one answer lifestyle, trade, soilders, army structure, feudalism, democracy, ancient cities , , tax system, mercenaries, Persian attack , huns sycthian attacks on india which this person does
Super and Thank you for getting him
Good information 👍
Jai Shree Ram
Oh man ... good one... have been watching Jay for some time now ... and boy I am a big fan of him.
Kitna kuch sikhne ko mil rha h m to khush hogya hu bahot sach m...Mera question jarur Lena Sikander aur porus ki sachayi sir please
You should make a podcast on Maurya Empire in detail 🙏
Q1 - As per this person, if the population started moving towards Ganga, after Saraswati started drying up - How come Sri Ram existed in Ganga Planes with Janak and other kingdoms before 2k years of Mahabharat where mention of Saraswati is there, means the Saraswati was flowing. ?
History mein mythology mat Mila Bhai
@@rahultiwari-dx8qo Konsa Mythology?
Kis duniya me hai ? Ramayan ke hone ke hundreds of proofs mil chuke hai . Par tum jaise Maccole Putra usko myth hi manoge .
@@rahultiwari-dx8qo Not your fault.
Aise chutiye so called Historians ko follow Karoge to yahi hoga.
Go and check works of Dr. Nilesh Oak and Rajiv Ranjan Prasad.
To tere hisaab se udne Wala plane bhi hoga pehle time mein?
@@dhruveshsureshrathi8462 arey madar ..t kya facts Sri Ram ji ke ayodhya ka koi Avsesh mila hai yaa jaise Dwarka ko discover Kiya kya woh Mila yaa Rath ke Avsesh mile ek pull mila tha nasa ke satellite pe vo bhi 7,00,000 saal purana..jhooth bolega harami
7:53 Strongly disagree. Many Students learn history only till Class X. If interpretations are not told then children will start believing things as gospel truth.
Have been watching Jay vardhan's video. He explains so nicely
i am doing Masters in history and jay vardhan helping me thanks Vaad
Subscribed to Jay's channel 😀
Biggest gap in this explanation of Varna is its misunderstanding as hereditary but it's just a classification of the nature of work. Every individual performs different tasks with specific Varna characteristics with prominence of one due to time we dedicate for it. While more one progresses in unifying it within oneself is what we call yoga.
India ka Most Based Podcast
Matlab
???
@@Mayankchandra24 Based Matlab बढ़िया
Wonderful video, looking forward to the series. Subscribed his channel.
Your interpretation of Cast or Verna is wrong.
In South Most of the kings are from so called 4th Verna, but they married with other Verna, it all depends on circumstances. nothing fixed like like antinational historians.
Feel sorry for your understand when u are from JNU it is obvious.
Saaaar
One request to you, hope you find time for that.
1. Das Rajanya episode ( any tangible information about the internal disagreement - conflict between the Rigvedic tribes which drove the parashu s / parshab s to further west) and evolution of Indic inscriptions ( from sruti-smriti to inscriptions whether pictorial or phonetic, then evolution of scripts - like kharosti -brahmi- sharda etc. and where does pali / prakrit fit in ? linguistic automaton). 🙏
Great
Shukriya aaj meri 7 saal ki history aab complete hogai apki wajah se me yutube channels apka special shukriya krunga kiyu ki apki wajah se me sampuran hogya jaise 16 kala sampuran hote hai esha mehsoos ho raha hai abh bataunga bharat k mullo ko bharat sanskriti ki real civilization jai hindutva 🙏🏻🚩
Amazing podcast. Maja aa gaya 🔥
🙏🙏
Very insightful episode 👌🏻
Such stone also found in Balaghat, Jabalpur madhya pradesh, India 🇮🇳
although Jay shows the Gupta Empire as small in his videos, claiming he has no archaeological evidence to show otherwise, shows the Sassanians as having conquered Sindh and Gandhar, despite having no archaeological evidence.
There is definitely evidence of sassanid authority in gandhar what are you talking about
@@randomturd1415 show me where archaeological evidence lies
@@kanhaibhatt913 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kushano-Sasanian_Kingdom
@@randomturd1415 they existed as a sub kingdom, and for only over a century, that too in Gandhar. Sassanids existed for much longer after that. Show me archaeological proof like rock reliefs, art, coinage proving long term mainstream Sassanid dominance in Sindh and Gandhar.
@@kanhaibhatt913 coinage for Kandahar is already in the link. Sindh coinage below
@ 17:00 why most Indian don’t recognize the fact that Parthians, people that came with Indo Greeks, Scythians, Kushans, even Hun belonged to Deva sect of Aryans. There were Asur in power at same time also but base of all these empires followed Devas. Same as Indian Brahmins.
First coins of Hindu Gods were not minted in India rather minted in Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, East Iran and Turkmenistan. It should be clear they were not threat to Brahminical system.
Now we have Bactrian manuscript which invokes Ram to validate a agreement. There is no Ram archeology in India. Vasudeva coins started before Kushans ever entered Gangatic areas. These are solid proofs that if anything so-called invaders boosted Brahmanism
Aaya nav buddhu channel ka gajput jhooth bolne🤣🤣🐘🐘
@@anahita934 tere Budh to aap Saka muni hai. Saka logo ka Sadhu. Saka vi invaders hi hai.
Go eat gobar. Tumara jahan kush nahi. Sab Aryans ka diya hua hai
@@uprightwalkingape3483 camel mutra peene wale buddha shakya the toh wo saka ho gaye?? 🤣🤣ye videshiyon ki theory mat bata hume..
@@anahita934 vedeshio ke god le liye. Un se र, श, क्षेत्र, ज्ञ le liya. Tumare khoon mein 20 se 40% videshio ke beej hai. Vedeshi nikal do to Andaman ke advasi ke ande hi reh jayenge.
Baccha School jao achi parahi karo kisi videsh mein nokri mil jayge. Nahi to rail patri par tatti karne layk hi rahoge
@@uprightwalkingape3483 sabit kar camel mutra peene wale ki videshiyon ke God le liye???sabit jar ki pali se sanskrit bani??Ye tum logo ki gappe truth nahi hai.. Theories ko chhor ke evidence provide karo phir aana gyan dene.
This is the interested way to understand history
अभी इस भाई को और पढ़ने की अवयस्कता है.. अभी इनका ज्ञान बहुत निम्न है।
Bhai yeh PhD kar raha hai.
@@gujjewman96 तो phd कर रहा है तो क्या मतलब वो संपूर्ण ज्ञानी हो गया... आप लोगो डिग्री छोर ज्ञान को प्राथमिकता दे नहीं तो जीवन भार सत्य को नहीं पा सकते।
@@ANILSINGH-kf9cl PhD ke liye research karni padti hai bhai kitab ratne se nahi milti
@@gujjewman96 तो फिर रोमिला thapar, b n jha or sare communist bhi ko bhi sahi man le e bhai....
@@ANILSINGH-kf9cl Bhai me khudh vampanthi vichardhara ka naxali hoon
Great video , maza aya💥💥
Jaivardhan bhai maza aa gya
kuru capital was hastinapur(modern meerut), not indraprastha...
U are right ,, indraprastha to pandav ne banaya tha kanha sang milkar ,, ganga ji ke pass hastinapur
Avanti king Pradyota and Bimvisara's royal physician Jivaka
please upload all video of conversation with Jay
Nice conversation
Jay Vardhan ji you mentioned about Arayan Migration theory being endorsed in all modern historical books. Do you endorse the same in light of Rakhigarhi which already demolished the same coupled with recent findings of Rath in UP?
It hasn't demolished anything
@@rishavkumar1250 demolished ho chuka hai...aajkal foreign researchers bhi manne lage hai iss bat ko.
Vaad ka hi iss topic pe ek interview hai iss mamle me ek archeologist ka, Maharashtrian hai wo vyakti.
Dekhiye wo wala video.
@@vickydonor5922 AMT is related to genetics,not archeology
great one
Interesting 😊
Wow great stream
Dhanybad ❤😂
DhanyaVaad 😂
Magadha, Kasi, Kausal, Vriji Supremacy 💪💪💪💪💪bhaiya land supremacy 💪💪💪💪💪💪
Sochne ki baat hai kya se kya ho gye ye areas ajj
@@dineshsharma6125 full caste politics
@@dineshsharma6125 mandal politics in UP and Bihar and CPI rule in Bengal destroyed economic wealth of eastern corridor while the rest of the parts took off after 1991 reforms and we were doing agrda pichda politics.
भारतीय इतिहासकारों को एक विशेष मोतियाबिंद हो रखा है जिसमें 6 वी शदी ईसा पूर्व से पुराना इतिहास नहीं दिखता। - वेदवीर आर्य
कृपया वेदवीर आर्या जी द्वारा सुझाए गए कालक्रम पर भी टिप्पणी का अनुरोध है।🙏
Very interesting
I wanted to ask you one question, what was spoken language used in Mahavir and Buddha period? was it Brahmi or Prakrit or Sanskrit? If Sanskrit then it was gradually reduced due to rise of foreign languages brought by Parsian, Hun and Khushaan invasion.
Excellent
1:02:56 PLZ read Vishnu Puran in mentions chandragupt is son of Nands
Not worth. It would've been more interesting if Arihant contested his points or at least put forward new findings which puncture many old theories. If one had to listen to this guy's lecture, it is already available on his channel. This podcast seems like an opportunity lost.
एकराट् not ekaarat
Puranas do not mention mauryas as shudras, later commentaries do say.
This guy is still biased, for those who don't know. Take his words with a pinch of salt.
He is studying history from the lens of outsider and it is taught like that in India. Unless you change the discourse academically, you will always produce people like him. He also can't help because this is how history is being taught in college
@@dineshsharma6125 you are wrong... You don't have any idea about this guy. It is totally judgemental view.
@@akk7791 I have seen his videos, he is quite informative but the narratives he goes along aren't his but European.
@@dineshsharma6125 Nope, he has a strong grasp of Emic viewpoints but successfully adapts to standards of International scholarly history which other Indians, typically Nationalists, do a terrible job of doing.
@@tvrulz46 Nationalist? Who national, National people, Nationalist scholars? Can you name some scholars?
Jai Vardhan ji ab apne channel par hindi main bhi videos upload kare taki hum apki videos ko aur circulate kar sake 🙏
Waiting for the 2nd one
Wow it's good ❤️
Jay ji जिसे आप एकारथ कह रहे हैं(कदाचित अंग्रेजी में देखकर), वह वस्तुतः 'एकराट्' है। राट् शब्द राजा का बोधक है और एकराट् का अर्थ है एकमात्र शासक। जैसे सम्राट का अर्थ है सम् अर्थात सम्यक अथवा पूर्ण राजा।
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏👏👏
गुप्त शासक गंगा घाटी के सैनिक ब्राह्मण थे जिन्होंने देश की रक्षा प्राचीन काल से की है।
सिकंदर पराजित हुआ था पंजाब के में महीहार ब्राह्मणों से जो कालांतर में मोहियाल ब्राह्मण के रुप में जाने गए।
इन्हीं सैनिक ब्राह्मणों ने भारत का इस्लामीकरण नहीं होने दिया। इनकी एक शाखा जो दिल्ली के आस पास हरियाणा, पंजाब, उत्तर प्रदेश एवं राजस्थान में रहते थे, उन्होंने बहुत दिनों तक मुस्लिम आक्रांताओं का प्रतिरोध किया। बिहार में गंगा घाटी के सैनिक ब्राह्मण जो भूमिहार ब्राह्मण के नाम से जाने जाते हैं, ने प्रतिरोध किया। इस क्रम में बनारस के भूमिहार ब्राह्मण शासक ने काशी को मुस्लिमों से मुक्त कराया। बनारस के भूमिहार ब्राह्मण शासकों ने ही अयोध्या एवं मथुरा में मंदिर की भूमि क्रय कर मंदिरों का निर्माण करवाया। बिहार के ही हथुआ राज, बेतिया राज एवं अन्य कई भूमिहार ब्राह्मणों ने बहुत ही प्रतिरोध करते हुए हिंदू धर्म को नष्ट होने से बचाया। गंगा घाटी में मंदिरों के नष्ट होने के पश्चात गांव गांव में ठाकुरबाड़ी एवं मठों की स्थापना हुई जो हिंदू धर्म के केंद्र थे। इन भूमिहार ब्राह्मणों का पूर्ण योगदान समयाभाव एवं स्थानाभाव के कारण वर्णित करना संभव नहीं है।
What do you think of Christopher Beckwith 's identification of Sakas with the Shakyas
please provide some substance on south india and north east
Magadh empire was founded by Jarasandha. But his grandson somadhi became emperor after last king of Pandavas. Magadh became empire after 150 years of Mahabharath.
6:14 with that logic, Guptas could have been Vaishya/Shudras too
Historian Meenakshi Jain has said that the Guptas were pottery traders and thus were Vaishyas
@@nirmalchandrabiswas6403 pottery traders are shudras
@@burberry7353 so that implies Guptas were shudras 😏
Nothing was said about Kalinga that is the region of Odisha. What is the earliest mention of Kalinga in history?
River bank ke pass khudai Karo sab itihas niklega ,, sonouli ka sach dekha kya ? Rakhigarhi ka sach dekha kya ??? Secret of sonouli dekh lo .
Magadha empire became powerful when kuru vamsa( Pandavas ) became weak. Magadha empire king was Somadhi.He was the grandson of Jarasandha.
TRUTH HAMESHA ZYADA BELIEVABLE NAHI LAGTA ... WOH HATHI KI CHORI WAALI STORY SAHI HAI ...
JNU wala Romila Thapar Ki History ?
Truth hurts
Mai sabhi dosto se bus ye bolna chahta hoon History padhkar apas me na lade bus present me sabse milkar desh ko aage badahye🥰🙏🙏🙏🏻♥️💖 kyounki History me sab ek dusre se ladte they kyounki ki kingdom hua krta tha esliye to Democracy ki jarurat padi💖💖♥️🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🙏🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
that Time Brahmins were shatriya and shatriya were Brahmins. They have same Gotras and DNAs mostly . and there are thousands of Intermarriages mentioned in vedas and earlier History .