Part I Section I Ch. I 00:29 Part I Section I Ch. IV 35:30 Part II Section II Ch. I 3:21:34 Part II Section II Ch. II 3:35:28 Part III Ch. I 5:08:37 Part III Ch. II 5:17:30 Pg 127 5:53:27 Part III Ch. IV 7:12:12 Pg 158 7:16:40 Part III Ch. V 7:26:25 Part VI 9:55:10 Part VI Section I 9:55:50
I'm just playing minecraft with this running in the background. I feel so cultured and highly-educated now. Thank you. Informative and tolerably entertaining.
This is the most detailed accurate explanation of human passion and human nature I've ever heard but that doesn't mean exceptions don't exist . Thanks to all the readers even though some chapters were repeated
a table of contents would be much appreciated! I know it's a lot of work, but it would be good to know the beginning of each part in relation to a timestamp
Lovely torture, thank you. Im always in pain when listening to philosophy. It is a passion of mine and i cant ever share it, since i have adhd and cant get to university. Oh well
Don’t stop!!! I really got a charge from your post... I’m not diagnosed as anything.... but I , like you, feel I couldn’t possibly achieve an understanding of any thought greater than “here I am - this day plus another day equals another same such day.” Although enjoying this reading... (besides the constant distractions) you keep on absorbing and understanding for free NO CHARGE what many pay LOADS of money an may appreciate/absorb/learn even less than than you... I think you folk are referred to as ‘autodidact’. Never stop being interested.
"Moral scientists in this science".... yeah, no. Sorry, if you're asking us to do science, then you should simply let us do science. Unlike Smith, who made some very astute observations but was working without access to the resources and data we have today, we are doing mostly empirical work.Thus, morality does not play a part. Do not be mad at the science behind economics because it is disagreeable to you. What to do with the science is in the realm of policy makers and philosophers.
@@sinistril The dominant "science" in economics is Keynesian economics, and it's a shit show. What're you talking about? There's no empiricism here in the mainstream -- only corruption. We'd be better off with moral philosophers over the con artist sociopaths in control.
Without any grounding in more recent philosophy, Adam smith goes to great lengths to understand the *Other*. Thus, essentially pre-inventing deconstructionist philosophy, feminism, intersectional philosophy, and solid economic theory. I assume he was othered in his own life, which probably gave him the push to think in this direction.
Part I Section I Ch. I 00:29
Part I Section I Ch. IV 35:30
Part II Section II Ch. I 3:21:34
Part II Section II Ch. II 3:35:28
Part III Ch. I 5:08:37
Part III Ch. II 5:17:30
Pg 127 5:53:27
Part III Ch. IV 7:12:12
Pg 158 7:16:40
Part III Ch. V 7:26:25
Part VI 9:55:10
Part VI Section I 9:55:50
Also, I'm grateful for this recording. Much appreciated. I think Smith would disapprove if I failed to show gratitude.
That is correct, He was too grateful with people, I read this physical book 1 month ago, ia the best in economics!
I'm just playing minecraft with this running in the background. I feel so cultured and highly-educated now. Thank you. Informative and tolerably entertaining.
Feeling highly cultured and educated because you are playing Minecraft, or because you are listening to this?
;)
This is the most detailed accurate explanation of human passion and human nature I've ever heard but that doesn't mean exceptions don't exist . Thanks to all the readers even though some chapters were repeated
I wish that all psychologists who set up office to treat people with emotional problems had 50% of the insight Smith has into the human nature
Its must read book next to his work the wealth of nations both compliment each other.
Part I of the propriety of actions
Section 1 of the sense of propriety
00:29 Chapter 1 - of sympathy
Who ever this Adam Smith is, its fantastic. 4min in and he has already explained what the Observer is.
a table of contents would be much appreciated! I know it's a lot of work, but it would be good to know the beginning of each part in relation to a timestamp
Came here from the distractible podcast, talked about moral theory briefly and I am already so interested.
Lovely torture, thank you. Im always in pain when listening to philosophy. It is a passion of mine and i cant ever share it, since i have adhd and cant get to university. Oh well
dochmbi I assume where you're from, bad grades mean no university?
Don’t stop!!! I really got a charge from your post... I’m not diagnosed as anything.... but I , like you, feel I couldn’t possibly achieve an understanding of any thought greater than “here I am - this day plus another day equals another same such day.”
Although enjoying this reading... (besides the constant distractions) you keep on absorbing and understanding for free NO CHARGE what many pay LOADS of money an may appreciate/absorb/learn even less than than you... I think you folk are referred to as ‘autodidact’.
Never stop being interested.
2:12:59 - Part I, Section III, Chapter II
Very great book !
How low Economics has fallen since his time. We need Moral scientists in this science agin.
Russ Roberts
"Moral scientists in this science".... yeah, no. Sorry, if you're asking us to do science, then you should simply let us do science. Unlike Smith, who made some very astute observations but was working without access to the resources and data we have today, we are doing mostly empirical work.Thus, morality does not play a part. Do not be mad at the science behind economics because it is disagreeable to you. What to do with the science is in the realm of policy makers and philosophers.
@@sinistril The dominant "science" in economics is Keynesian economics, and it's a shit show. What're you talking about? There's no empiricism here in the mainstream -- only corruption. We'd be better off with moral philosophers over the con artist sociopaths in control.
Great reading skills i have no problem of hearing the reader.
Except for around 2:45 hour mark
6:06:58 Part III, Chapter III
Chapter 01 - 00:31
1:13:48
How is the spark of humanity quantifiable?
01:24:13 of the unsocial passions
The microphones used are poor quality guys.
How we have misconstrued this man's thoughts.
Thinking he was only about wealth, greed, economics
Thankyou
Please, put english subtitles
12:58
Great book by the author of the Wealth of Nations.
Ch vi sec ii 10:15:55
10:19:15 ch 1
10:50
50:34
1:49:23
@@LMGG522 7:07:39
7:26:38 Part III, Chapter V
I bet Adam Smith read the Stoics
He must have. I enjoy stoicism too. I enjoy learning, knowledge & wisdom.
Without any grounding in more recent philosophy, Adam smith goes to great lengths to understand the *Other*. Thus, essentially pre-inventing deconstructionist philosophy, feminism, intersectional philosophy, and solid economic theory. I assume he was othered in his own life, which probably gave him the push to think in this direction.
Young Joseph Hernandez Edward Young Maria
Nice voice
Great reading, and but I think I wish this was reD by some historic sounding old man.
Be careful what you think you wish for
@@jcorkable haha be careful what you think is great advice
2nd reader is bad.
Please edit these I can’t stand the wet smacking of the persons lips and it sounds like some of them have candy in their mouth
Then read it on your own
7:12:25 Part III, Chapter IV
8:19:46 Part IV, Chapter I