I can't believe they have the sea bonnies in there but not Michael, phone guy or phone dude??? Idk what went wrong with this book. Also the wrong information too? this is so weird.
And do we need Mike exactly in that book? No one knows what awaits us in the future. Will he make another encyclopedia with new information, so we need Mike now?
This is obviously just an elaborate advertisement for the new FNAF stuff. They gave each Glamrock two pages, but the protagonist of like 50% of the games doesn't get acknowledged.
I think the reason Mike didn’t get in is because, technically, it’s not confirmed that we play as Mike in any of the games beside Sister Location, so the authors didn’t want to mess with that in the “Game Appearances” section
I hope this book is intensionally bad, so they could say this was a manipulation tactic by Fazbear entertainment. So who knows the movie and ruin might be the true answer, and the incorrect gender stuff is just a clue to its unreliability. Edit: I am wrong and this book likely wasn't written by Scott
It is very unlikely I am correct. Scholastic likely didn't care or know about the source material. For example Henry's page is just a poorly paraphrased version of FNAF 6's ending speech. But the Movie and Ruin will likely still give us answers anyway.
What would Scott Cawthon's purpose be in lying in the books? He never lied. Books are a different reality than games. Ex: Crying Child died in the games, but not in the books. He never lied.
I heard someone said in a comment week’s ago that Scott doesn’t want to reveal any lore. Also when I was commenting about me hearing about that, someone replied to me saying it ws about a detective character for the 1st Freddy file’s. Personally, I don’t think Scott will ever reveal the lore.
There are quite a few characters missing. The majority of them are book characters, like Fetch, Eleanor, all other human protagonists. Also I think the writers got confused with FNAF AR fan content as there are a handful of characters that they wrongfully marked as being in the game.
It says that: Nightmarionne, nightmare bonnie, nightmare Chica are in FNAF AR and they’re missing glamrock endos.(Reminding you that Scott approved this somehow)
Do you believe they are complaining about lack of information? They don't know what Scott is going to do in the future. And a proof that the number of pages and information are vague.
5:01 SpringBonnie never appeared in any of Scott’s game’s (I mean like the night, the main gameplay) but appear’s in the book’s. FredBear (for some reason) doesn’t appear but he does. 14:05 He’s holding a Hex FredBear plush, they are cannon.
They meesed up with lolbits,mangles,funtime foxys,babys,chicas.pupet and bonbons gender They just called all the fox animatronics male even if lolbit,funtime foxy,mangle are all girls and boys at the same time and So it would be better if they called them she/he and beyond that the lore in this book in confusing and has errors
While I like the book, I feel like this book should be updated and, this time, add the missing characters that we wanna see. And if FNAF is gonna add the movie characters, please don't miss a single character please. If the animatronics are the same as the ones we see every day, at least squeeze some details about them like "based off from the world's popular indie game movie" or something. Even though I'm getting this, I really do hope they make the updated one because, at first, I thought they're gonna have EVERY character from the Fazbear Frights books (minus the novel trilogy because they're revealed, right?), and the Terror tales of the Pizzaplex. That's what we, Fnaf fans want! MORE CHARACTERS with background info about them.
Michael he really saw the nightmares, however, who is in fact the main character of the gameplay of fnaf 4 is the crying child, the two saw the nightmares only the difference is that Mike started having nightmares after the bite of 83 before It was the crying child who had the nightmares and hallucinations.
@@saidbtk they are, there's nothing like an illusion disk or anything like that, in no game has this been addressed and not in the Freddy's files or in fnaf character encyclopedia.
@@sharkzilla7107 UCN nightmare freddy: “I am remade, but not by you…” UCN nightmare freadbear: “this time, there is more than an illusion to fear” and we know that we play as afton in UCN
@@saidbtk Even so they are nightmares, Scott himself said that in the book, ok the book was not literally written by him but he was supervising the people writing and he analyzed the facts of the book.
Tim: We're missing Great Escape Golden Freddy
Fans: What about Mike?
I can't believe they have the sea bonnies in there but not Michael, phone guy or phone dude??? Idk what went wrong with this book. Also the wrong information too? this is so weird.
And do we need Mike exactly in that book? No one knows what awaits us in the future. Will he make another encyclopedia with new information, so we need Mike now?
And other information is elsewhere. Like Michael, his information is in the Survival Lock Book.
This is obviously just an elaborate advertisement for the new FNAF stuff. They gave each Glamrock two pages, but the protagonist of like 50% of the games doesn't get acknowledged.
I think the reason Mike didn’t get in is because, technically, it’s not confirmed that we play as Mike in any of the games beside Sister Location, so the authors didn’t want to mess with that in the “Game Appearances” section
the michael afton drought in this book
On the cover of the book it's not a "fan render" of the Puppet, it's in fnaf vr when she comes out of the box she swings her arms like that so yeah
They forgot phone guy
I hope this book is intensionally bad, so they could say this was a manipulation tactic by Fazbear entertainment. So who knows the movie and ruin might be the true answer, and the incorrect gender stuff is just a clue to its unreliability.
Edit: I am wrong and this book likely wasn't written by Scott
It is very unlikely I am correct. Scholastic likely didn't care or know about the source material. For example Henry's page is just a poorly paraphrased version of FNAF 6's ending speech. But the Movie and Ruin will likely still give us answers anyway.
Overall it's just not worth anyone's time
What would Scott Cawthon's purpose be in lying in the books? He never lied. Books are a different reality than games. Ex: Crying Child died in the games, but not in the books. He never lied.
Ruin blah blah blah
Your criticisms are not valid.
The Nightmare they are in the fnaf ar files
your video helped me redo the fnaf encyclopedia book
I heard someone said in a comment week’s ago that Scott doesn’t want to reveal any lore.
Also when I was commenting about me hearing about that, someone replied to me saying it ws about a detective character for the 1st Freddy file’s.
Personally, I don’t think Scott will ever reveal the lore.
the thursday arrived to me
There are quite a few characters missing. The majority of them are book characters, like Fetch, Eleanor, all other human protagonists. Also I think the writers got confused with FNAF AR fan content as there are a handful of characters that they wrongfully marked as being in the game.
It says that: Nightmarionne, nightmare bonnie, nightmare Chica are in FNAF AR and they’re missing glamrock endos.(Reminding you that Scott approved this somehow)
@@TimTamThomas i mean lefty was supposed to be in fnaf ar so i could kinda understand him, but all the others are like they rushed
@@TimTamThomasthis isn’t in the encyclopedia but in the ULTIMATE guide the picture of JJ is just another balloon boy render
@@TimTamThomas just realized I’m not subbed, lets change that.
This book will probably get updated over time just like the ultimate guide
Probably 😊, only time will tell.
Do you believe they are complaining about lack of information? They don't know what Scott is going to do in the future. And a proof that the number of pages and information are vague.
Angel (gumdrop angel)
Angels mom (gumdrop angel)
Oswald (into the pit)
Micheal (into the pit)
Rory (Sea Bonnies)
Mott (Sea Bonnies)
Stanley (Room For One More)
5:01
SpringBonnie never appeared in any of Scott’s game’s (I mean like the night, the main gameplay) but appear’s in the book’s.
FredBear (for some reason) doesn’t appear but he does.
14:05
He’s holding a Hex FredBear plush, they are cannon.
They meesed up with lolbits,mangles,funtime foxys,babys,chicas.pupet and bonbons gender
They just called all the fox animatronics male even if lolbit,funtime foxy,mangle are all girls and boys at the same time and
So it would be better if they called them she/he and beyond that the lore in this book in confusing and has errors
I edited it a little bit
pretty sure funtime foxy is just male, but you I know what you mean
@@shortstreet53 still its not confirmed and the book has errors anyway
@@ix_skillx_pxin4645 in ucn his voice lines only use male pronouns and his voicelines are male too
@@shortstreet53 are you a new fnaf fan? She never had male pronounce and she doesnt have voiclines? From where did you get that information?
3.15 well the blackligth are not funko’s OC they are scratched design
They were supposed to appear in help wanted but the idea was scratch
So amazing this book
While I like the book, I feel like this book should be updated and, this time, add the missing characters that we wanna see. And if FNAF is gonna add the movie characters, please don't miss a single character please. If the animatronics are the same as the ones we see every day, at least squeeze some details about them like "based off from the world's popular indie game movie" or something. Even though I'm getting this, I really do hope they make the updated one because, at first, I thought they're gonna have EVERY character from the Fazbear Frights books (minus the novel trilogy because they're revealed, right?), and the Terror tales of the Pizzaplex. That's what we, Fnaf fans want! MORE CHARACTERS with background info about them.
Michael he really saw the nightmares, however, who is in fact the main character of the gameplay of fnaf 4 is the crying child, the two saw the nightmares only the difference is that Mike started having nightmares after the bite of 83 before It was the crying child who had the nightmares and hallucinations.
they’re not nightmares
@@saidbtk they are, there's nothing like an illusion disk or anything like that, in no game has this been addressed and not in the Freddy's files or in fnaf character encyclopedia.
@@sharkzilla7107
UCN nightmare freddy: “I am remade, but not by you…”
UCN nightmare freadbear: “this time, there is more than an illusion to fear”
and we know that we play as afton in UCN
@@saidbtk Even so they are nightmares, Scott himself said that in the book, ok the book was not literally written by him but he was supervising the people writing and he analyzed the facts of the book.
@@sharkzilla7107 why would you trust a book not written by him over a game literally made by him lol
Where is the STAFF bots
Where can I get this book?
I ordered mine off Amazon
I have this book 😊
hey, for me foxy rennder looks diferent, is not a fix foxy draw is a foxy head 6:16
where is dj music man?
@@TimTamThomas and scrap chica
@@TimTamThomas oh and shadow mangle
@@TimTamThomas and shaterets glamrocks
@@-DriftYT- Scrap girl appeared once in a book and is not canon
@@isabelortiz1230 but is an animatronic, and where are the adventure animatronics
Secret code?
Melted chocolate bonnie isn’t hear 😅
Ok but that’s not it little red chica isunt there eva HA!