A collaboration of scientists is sounding the alarm on climate change
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 сен 2023
- The World Weather Attribution just released a report saying human-caused climate change played a big role in the catastrophic flooding in Libya.
WATCH the ABC News Live Stream Here:
• LIVE: Latest News Head...
SUBSCRIBE to ABC NEWS: bit.ly/2vZb6yP
Watch More on abcnews.go.com/
LIKE ABC News on FACEBOOK / abcnews
FOLLOW ABC News on TWITTER: / abc
#climatechange #scientists #libya #weather #flooding #abcnews
This will never change. Corporate greed prevails over all.
..C02 makes up only 0.04% of the Troposphere....that's only 4 one hundredths of ONE percent.(very small amount) If we lower that to 0.02%....? All plant life on the Earth will die and that means every living thing will die. Look it up
Well get off your computer or cell build a grass hut and wear leaves for cloths and hunt your own food i’m not
@@jackmeoff1148 There's always alternatives. Corporations take the cheapest way out to maximize profits.
Yes but, "Nature bats last! *prof. Guy McPherson
@@brooksanderson2599 You better believe it. I live close to a lake which is one of the dirtiest in the world due to corporate dumping. You can't swim or eat fish out of it.
Keep taking down trees and replacing them with industrial-sized parking lots with no water seeping thru anymore. Think about it! Trees = shade... Parking lots = BIG HEAT SINK COOKING THE GROUND BELOW
Takeaway - Would've happened anyway, but a bunch of narcissists say it happened worserer.
Yes
Your gonna pass away anyway
But your rampant cocaine use makes is worserer
"worserer"! AHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAA Yeah, tell us all about it, Mr. "worserer."
@@SteffiReitsch I'm saddened by your inability to detect and understand wordplay, but have fun abusing the hell out of those AHs.
Humanity has already lost the opportunity to prevent climate change. The lock down showed that carbon emissions could be significantly minimised due to everyone staying home. Now that it's lifted, it's back to business as usual and the pollution from vehicles and what-not is returning. Some opportunities only come knocking once.
Prevent like categorying
@@gppsoftware We did. It had an impact in reducing emissions. Your lack of understanding does not make you right. Learn or die.
@@gppsoftware We measured it. Can you not look up data yourself? Or more likely, do you just not understand it because you don't have the education? No shame in it. The shame is when you pretend you know better than experts. Because you don't. So obviously. Like no rational person would go "YUUUUP I KNOW MORE THAN THE 2 MILLION FOLKS WHO DUN SPENT THEIR LIFE RESEARCHING IT HUR DURRRRR".
@@gppsoftware: It was less effective than the extermination of the American Buffalo 🦬 wasn’t it?
@@Karlswebb: What was the extermination of the American Buffaloes 🦬 effect? The effect of the Centralia, PA fire 🔥 burning for over 60 years? The Massive War exchanges in Asia and the Middle East? The Super Jets flying around the World? The 9/11 Twin Towers fires?
I've been diagnosed with climate anxiety😮😂
Living in a cave will fix your problem...and ours too.
Mother Nature has 1200 gigatons of pressurized methane in the world's largest ocean shelf, the ESAS waiting for you - and it will have an "abrupt eruption" soon - no reason to be anxious. hahaha
No wonder, there are a billion people like you, mostly children, who shouldn´t be horrified with extreme lies about things. Check outside of juutuup and MSM, say rumble (if I can write it in juutuup) what for example Jordan B. Peterson said about the climate hoax, and from there you´ll find the links to the actual climate scientists who reveal what the data say, and what it do NOT say.
I already live in a cave
you should sue every media outlet that has been fear mongering climate change without mentioning the perfectly simple cheap and unskilled solution to all of it. Repair the Rhizosphere, end the Carbon Crisis. Every single piece of media that threatens you with the danger of climate change without mentioning the Carbon Cycle and the Rhizosphere CAUSED your anxiety. They didn't just trigger it. They engineered it. Sue the fk out of them. And tell all your friends.
If you want to slow it down you are going to have to plant a billion trees and planting that many trees could potentially stop it
Actually, reducing our CO2 and methane emissions is the most important way to slow down global warming. Plant-rich diets and the massive reforestation those would allow for come in second.
Actually, the removal of trees in the Amazon is contributing big time to the lack of oxygen being generated, fewer trees to remove CO2 from our atmosphere is catastrophic.
95 percent of electric cars are still on the road. The other 5 percent made it home.
Ill ditch my gas stove after you ditch your private jet.
Texas is hot, but I remember when it was colder in October
Ooooo a collaboration of scientists?? Sounds important
But nobody with the power to really change thingsis listening 😞
What are you talking about, abc is part of msm and therefore it is basically the govts propaganda tool. You would not have known about this issue if it wasnt for the people in power. So talk about being brainwashed.
If this is a issue, there is easy solution, like sai, marine clouding, but they dont want easy solutions, they want to use this topic as a excuse to oppress and control people. They will probably use the easy solution when it has gone really really far, but until then they will try to take advantage of it as much as possible.
Btw, no matter how much she want to troll with the numbers, china and india is the big issues when it comes to emissions. The climate do not care if it is fair or not.
I know its madness. Like um we even need to ban cooking at home because it puts off co2 and burnt food is carbon. So bad for the environment.
Carbon is the next most common element in the human body, making up 18% of the body by mass. Its role is mostly structural, forming the “backbone” of many organic molecules. Our climate has trace amounts of different gases....including C02.....C02 makes up only 0.04% of the Troposphere....that's only 4 one hundredths of ONE percent.(very small amount) If we lower that to 0.02%....? All plant life on the Earth will die and that means every living thing will die. Climate change "Protesters" are uneducated and probably all failed science class....yet if our Administration lowers the C02 level just 2 one hundredths of that single percent....well.....you tell me. But they won't be able to...it's too big and fortunately regulates it's self...but they'll spend countless billions trying. Am I the only one who passed science class?
You and people like you can change it give up modern society and move back into a cave😂
Seriously? 45 thousand views? How much fossil fuel is being consumed by 45,000 people. How many of these people are taking showers that are too long? Cooking with gas? Eating too much meat? Driving too much.
If everybody starts saying NO, things will change!
Is it the same scientists who say men can get pregnant?
That’s when you use a different semantic argument for a man
Your arguing semantics
Please grow up
@@palebluedot7435 How much are you being paid to litter in this comment section?
@@palebluedot7435 what is a woman?
@@gab4690 do you know what a semantic argument is
A women as an idea is one of the sexual extrema of the human sexual spectrum
Done
But I assume you mean in life, as you experience it
It could be defined as a person born xx
But is that a women it your born xx with a penis (yes it’s a this it’s called for one sry xx)
Are you a women if your born with a vagina
What if your born with a vagina and have XY
That’s a male thing but again happens
What if your born with xx and have a vagina
But all the other genes are male and swapped into one of your x
Well maybe you learned a few things to look into
This ain’t new, I’ve heard this over and over again
What is “new” is a the climate emergency is given the coverage it deserves by publicly recognized main stream news outlet. 😊
This is getting worse, you won't be missed 😅
Ok but like
Do a search of articles essentially saying “Scientist Sound the Alarm On Climate Change”. You can find dozens from practically every year
@@WalterWhiteOfBeansand why do you think that is, derp? Couldn't be because it's getting worse... nah... Not at all. 😂
That’s why President Biden is leading the most ambitious climate, conservation, and environmental justice agenda in history.
This has to head the list as:
Most embarrassing employment trends
This is for all the Homeowners and parents to figure out
#climatechange
Lay large pits, future ditches and ponds, such as when a lot of rain falls in a short period, the water will be retained for a long time. Make sure that the outside of the ditch pond is saturated so that the water is retained through the bottom of the pit and pond for longer.
Climate change is making our climate great again as illustrated by my 5-minute music video ... ruclips.net/video/DNeujL1IoCA/видео.html
Beetle change
Or better yet, just stop being capitalists.
@@nevadataylor Better yet - add more CO2 ... ruclips.net/video/RLnQo8l-BHc/видео.html
Who is going to pay for that? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Solar cooker one of the best example of to study solar eclipse or solar system. Suddenly ozone leyer weak particular areas as well as time
Across the country, Americans are experiencing the devastating impacts of climate change.
Yep. The weather changes. Always has always will
Thanks to China’s emissions, whatever we do won’t make a dent in the problem
@@lobola956 We're the ones changing it, and for the worse. Failure to take responsibility is your mental weakness.
Two dams broke in a country in the middle of a civil war🤷♂️was the dam in Ukraine from climate change as well?
Depends on context…. Climate change will cause more war
Uk contributions
This year, many countries are badly hit by climate disasters, no matter rich or poor nations. Climate change is the most serious world issues, all the world must play active roles to stop CO2 emissions.
not stop .. just reduce .. right? If we stop CO2 emissions all plant life will starve and die.
We are going to run out of food.
Would you rather it be 63 or 36 Fahrenheit on Christmas day? ..
extremely Cold global temperatures means water moving less, less rainfall or snow resulting less ocean water and fresh water moving to land filling the lakes, valleys and deserts. Warm temperatures causes water to migrates more easily from the ocean to land reducing the amount of water in the ocean. Ice melting only adds more water to the ocean that is constantly finding its way to land. A climb in water levels will go down. Rock and lava can displace water and raise it levels. Islands take up space.
Lol you talk shite
The complexity of the Earth's climate system makes predicting long-term temperature changes and controlling climate change extremely difficult. The small increase in global temperatures over the last 60 years suggests a slower rate of change than is often portrayed.
Misconceptions about the proportion of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, such as the belief that it makes up over half of the Earth's atmosphere, can fuel irrational fears and misunderstandings about the actual impact of CO2.
The use of graphical representations to illustrate the proportion of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere helps clarify that CO2 is only a minor component, challenging the narrative that its increase is leading to catastrophic changes.
Assertions made by the media that scientists or organizations like NASA or the IPCC have provided definitive evidence of climate change impacts often lack direct sources or context, making it difficult to verify or challenge their claims.
The scientific method relies on the possibility of disproving hypotheses. However, long-term climate predictions often cannot be tested within a reasonable timeframe, making them less like scientific theories and more like untestable predictions.
The increase in plant biomass and agricultural yields observed with higher CO2 levels and warmer temperatures indicates that climate change could have beneficial effects, which contradicts the predominantly negative portrayal in media narratives.
The broad application of net-zero emissions goals may not consider the regional disparities in emissions changes, such as the increase in Asia compared to decreases in other regions, suggesting that a one-size-fits-all approach to climate policy may be misguided.
The focus on sensationalized climate disaster stories in the media often ignores the statistical context that shows a decrease in climate-related deaths over the past century, which indicates that technology and adaptation are effectively mitigating risks.😁
Why is deforestation never mentioned when discussing the climate? Maybe if they planted a forest in Libia or trees around the area the flooding wouldn't be such a problem.
Over 90% of Libia is desert , pops. Trees don't grow. You must be an American.
'deforestation' is part of every IPCC report.....
You already got the hint to plant trees in Death Valley.
@@SteffiReitsch And they couldn't irrigate it like they did in Israel?
@@Dmoriarty1993 And where is all that irrigation water going to come from? Why are there deserts, pops?
Deserts flood when there are sudden rainstorms. Always have, always will. The scorched earth of the deserts will never be able to absorb the water generated by thunderstorms. It happens all over the world's deserts. I see it every year here in America's Mojave Desert where it floods every year during the brief monsoon we get every summer. Low areas flood. Sheets of water travel all over the surface. This is NOT climate change.
"They're sounding the alarm"!
When have THEY started, stopped, or not sounded the alarm?
FYI. We don't believe you. Okay?
2 things which are not changing:
Human rights and climate change
2 things people gather to talk about
Human rights and climate change
We are still coming out of an ice age people
At a speed of 1 C in a 100 years?
@@mda. Nope. More like 1500 years.
Nope - more like 150 years....@@stopnato4158
@@stopnato4158We just increased by 0.5 degrees since the 1980s.
@@NashHinton Yeah, so we're told.
Governmental involvement is pivotal; robust policies must be enacted to champion environmental conservation and curtail carbon emissions.
Would you rather it be 63 or 36 Fahrenheit on Christmas day?
Hey one day this will all come to a stop and we shall be set FREE
And if it was up to you..
Historically the United States has twice as many GHG emissions since 1750 and the GHGs don't just fall out of the Sky, they stay up there for Centuries, Additionally 40% of China's GHG emissions come from producing products that will be consumed in the United States and Europe, so U.S. basically outsources a lot of its GHG emissions.
Don't forget to grease your Tesla.
I planted two trees now it's time to do your part
Key word, collaborate.
and everyone is waiting for the politicians to act, but the politicians just turn to their deaf ear...because that's not what the lobbyists are interested...and the vicious situation accelerates and we all blame each other in the end.
Signs & Tribulations! End of Days! Repent Your Climate Sins! Come to UN Jesus! Another f'g Vatican.
It’s only important for how they line their pockets.
They're only turning away because the doomers are hogging the mic and wasting their time, and our time as well.
What a bunch of BS !!! people are a wake up to this media BS.
I always troll their pages 😂
A good way to debunk the global warming doomsday bs is to show people things like.
🔍
Tony Heller climate fakery part 18
Don’t be crying when there’s no food on the shelves
Now we, who said this years ago, not crack pots anymore. Good to know.
My tatertot light went off and on
Nothing to do with the El-Nino we have this year ?
El Nino has gotten worse each time it's happened considering our CO2 emissions are 100 times faster than the 12 gigatons of CO2 emissions per 200 years as the natural background rate of the past 500 million years on Earth.
No. Successive El Nino years are warmer. So are successive La Nina years. The trend is up no matter how to slice and dice.
@@scottekoontz but wait there's more!
@@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885 Bot?
Poor infrastructure built 50 to 100 years ago puts us all at risk. Also wonder about other weather engineering. We have the knowledge to build structures that will withstand the challenges of modern civilization, we just want to appraoch this the hard way
Let this be a listen to you all stop cutting down trees. Start planting trees now save the earth
This is brought to you by the same people that say covid came from a bat.
How to say you don't understand science without saying you don't understand science 🤔
Fake news 😂 nice to see no one believes their lies anymore
@@okayfine506 Interesting snark. Sadly, it makes no sense.
@@prometheus5700 🥴
@@prometheus5700it’s just you not getting it lol
3:20 It realy does not matter - just make your politicians act now.
So we've experienced 1.2 degrees warming since before the industrial revolution. What happened when it was 5 degrees warmer in the last interglacial? And 5 to 10 degrees warmer during the Jurassic period? Carbon Dioxide was about 4 times greater then. What makes it so bad now? Is it "bad carbon" now and was it "good carbon" back then? And why is the map covered in blacks and reds? Is this really needed to show temperature differences or is it just to try to scare people? Sorry for all the questions good people but I really think we are being hogwashed here.
Mass extinction. Why do you think we’re at the edge of extinction now ?
Nothing startling about it
Scientists who get grants for such predictions.
Nice to know finger pointing ultimately returns to the owner of the blame-game.
World Weather Committee is asking the USA for 45.34 billion dollars to help the climate survivors of Libya. Please help climate survivors!!
Source
Even if we went to 1800 we probably the earth is or was influenced by human behavior. Could there possibly 1,000 year's of lag?
What upsets me about "climate change" is that we have all the answers to solve the problems, yet do absolutely nothing to fix them as it is always with the world. We know what not to do and we know how to prevent and we know how to solve, but here we are only ever just "talking" about it as it infinitely only gets worse according to....somebody...somewhere....out there...
China’s CO2 emissions alone mean that it won’t matter what we do in the long run. The process of creating electric vehicles and other solutions also requires consuming fuels
What is China doing to solve climate change?
China already has an estimated 54 million “green jobs”, with over 4 million jobs in renewable energy. China has also announced that it will no longer build coal-fired power plants abroad and will step up support for other countries in developing green and low-carbon energy.
No worries, man made climate change is a lie from the left!
Only God can change the climate!
Nobody is really serious about climate change unless we really seriously look at nuclear as an option for power. Obviously for generators and other portable power systems we use something else. But nuclear is wayyyy better than it ever has been. Safer by a lot too.
you couldn't be more delusionally wrong. Climate Change is as the result of consolidation and Industrialization of our Agriculture system. It does not matter where our energy comes from until we stop destroying all Life on Earth to pretend human life can be sustained separate from natural ecosystems. It can't. We've always known this. But your greed and the greed of your parents and grandparents prevent common sense from winning out.
Nuclear energy only puts more power in fewer hands. Quite literally. And that dependence model is the catalyst to the carbon crisis.
The only way to get "really serious about climate change" is to move out of the cities and suburbs, back to small farms, and start processing organic waste back into living soil and a living ecosystem.
Everything else you have been told or come to believe is a lie you tell yourself, and the media reinforces, to prevent the reality of this situation from dawning on your tiny echo chamber isolated perspective. Dirt Farmers are the solution to climate change. Not technology. Not the advancements in energy concentration or storage. Plain old waste management and unskilled human labor is the only actual solution.
Every minute of your carbon gluttonous and fully dependent life required a fixed amount of carbon. Every minute of a natural farmers life reduces atmospheric carbon by pulling it out of the air and storing it in living ecosystems and eventual under the lower meter line of soil where microbial life dies off. (this is the reverse of pulling oil out of the ground and burning it)
Get Woke. And I mean the kinda woke where you stop living in a manufactured dream created to placate the masses and establish permanent control through permanent dependence.
People like to rave about nuclear is more efficient, and the best alternative to every other energy source. But those same people never mention how absurdly expensive nuclear plants which may be the biggest reason hardly any are being built today. The cost of the new two Vogtle units in Georgia are now estimated to cost 34 BILLION $$!!
And all that talk of thorium reactors has produced nothing as of yet. The talk of small reactors to fill smaller markets is still just talk. If nuclear is so much better than the alternatives then why is nothing new being presented as a better option??
@@michaeldeierhoi4096 but if we are looking for an answer that will be available now then it’s the best and really only option. Also, there are numerous new designs for nuclear reactors that are safer and more efficient. Where those are at is not something I have knowledge of. I just know the power we can get from them is immense and clean.
Great points, when I was young the US was on the way to switching to nuclear power then 3 mile island happened and at the same time a movie called the China Syndrome was in theaters. After that nuclear was dead in the US. It was protested to death by environmentalist who really didn't care about the science. Ironically it is now considered green energy again. If we had made the switch in the 70's we would have hundreds of gigatons less CO2 in the atmosphere.
Fun fact... Everyone is just marking time until the completely 100% inevitable next CME/carrington event that's coming down the pike.
And then... major bigtime EMP. And then... eventual nuclear meltdowns of all the reactors and spent fuel pools as they lose their cooling systems. The planet will be quickly radiation sterilized from pole to pole.
Fun fact... No one survives. Not anyone anywhere. Everyone dies. And that's that. End of story.
Fun fact... There are hundreds and hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of nuclear reactors and spent fuel pools.
Fun fact... It is 100% inevitable that the planet will be in the wrong place at the wrong time for a CME/EMP.
Fun fact... nuclear war is hardly even worth mentioning compared to nuclear meltdowns.
Fun fact... A bomb goes boom and that's all the radiation it will ever produce. But meltdowns produce and spew out enormous amounts of new radioactive particles next to forever.
Fun fact... You won't enjoy dying from radiation sickness even the least little bit.
Fun fact... Every day that goes by has become one day less to global meltdown radiation oblivion.
The existence of the many, many, many hundreds of nuclear reactors and spent fuel pools and the loss of their cooling systems will be the Final Word as to What Will Be What.
In case anyone didn't get the memo yet...
its worth devastating the Earth for me to be comfy !
this is the reality of the situation right here. It's all the people living in suburbs and cities creating the same problems they cry about in order to live in this sick state of utter dependence that is no less slavery than actual whips and chains slavery was. But master's whip is softer than nature's whip... so lets all just keep being dependents on a system that treats us like livestock. At least the cows don't have to find their own food.
@@ZennExile
Awesome.
@@ZennExileWould you rather it be 63 or 36 Fahrenheit on Christmas day?
@@greengreengreen5132 what an oddly specific way to be completely irrelevant.
Thank you for a great and depth explanation of this very Urgent and important subject: Man Made Climate Change! Thank you Ginger for a great piece 👏
American conservatives will still say it "needs further study". They will say that even if it turns into "Waterworld".
Earth has always had water
Lmao
@@palebluedot7435 Either you are a troll, bot, or completely missed the obvious point.
@@wanderer3004 no I was being silly pointing out that if the word was drowned that’s would be their response
Yeah because EVERYTHING should be political
@@michellepickering7267If you think that isn't a political issue, then, that's on you.
😂. Can't wait for Mad Max.
Oh yeah extinction sounds great. Early retirement for everyone😂
won't be no Max to get Mad. The dying out part that comes after a dramatic change in climate isn't slow. When an ecosystem collapses, it collapses in a single year and cannot return. There's no slow drawn out period of suffering to survive. 4 days without water, 4 weeks without food, 4 months without shelter. That's the rule of 4. Humans cannot escape it.
People Power has the potential to:
Make cheap clean power anywhere,
Reduce most unemployment anywhere,
Eliminate poverty through stored energy sales anywhere.
First what is people power?
Power out from a storm or disaster?
There's People Power, any low tech solution that would bring power to any stricken area where people are. Wind and water turn wheels to make power, but so can people. Yes it can be stored ahead of time. Yes it's portable. Yes it's inexpensive. Yes it's good for the environment. Yes it's safe.
People Power, free power in any emergency, anywhere there are people.
Next...
People Power not only could make energy in an emergency power outage, but that type of low tech could also store energy for future use. That stored energy could be kept for backup, used in that area, or transfered and sold somewhere else.
We also know that there are places in the world where many people need work. Why not combine the two. Out of work people could be hired to use their physical power to make energy. They would not need much training, and virtually any healthy adult could do it full time or part time.
Next the extra money generated, could be used to buy solar panels to augment their revenues.
What we must insure is that these workers are paid a fair, honest wage, and treated well. This can never be forced labor.
Sum up: This is clearly a win win for everyone: Healthy power, many new unskilled jobs, and the end of poverty anywhere in the world, all in a new power industry.
Sedgwi er casks da comgba earth
Yes, we should definitely help climate change at the cost of everything else, including blocking traffic, vandalizing public property, even neglect our own children.
Umm no
See that’s called feelies
Let’s stick to facts
The facts are we can take a moderate hit to our economy short term and increase it long term
And our current actions will increase our economy short term but be the actual neglect to our grandkids long term
Do you love your grandkids
@@palebluedot7435jeeziss
@@palebluedot7435Would you rather it be 63 or 36 Fahrenheit on Christmas day?
@@greengreengreen5132 either where we have long term food security
You know your argument is bad come one be serious here
ARE…..not…..IS………….Unless you’re trying to sound like Ali G 🤷♂️
About 69% of Libya's export earnings and 60% of its GDP comes from petroleum products.. The flood deaths were tragic but, it was a case of suicide by human-caused climate change. More to come. old geologist
Libya had nothing to do with climate change let’s be real. It was a crumbling infrastructure. I’m not denying climate change but let’s not ignore the real reason those dams failed
Here in the U.S. it’s not helping when the ABC News station (a liberal news station) just happens to be showing South Dakota and North Dakota being adversely affected by climate change in such a way that it compares to states such as Texas and Florida (obviously not possible). What goes through many peoples minds is that the only thing that these states have in common is that they are red states and for the most part, they are states that are Republican. These states also happen to be the very states that many Americans, affluent and otherwise, are moving to while fleeing the overwhelming liberal blue states. Just look at the dark red areas that ABC News is showing with their WORLD TEMPS NOW map. If only the whining Democrats would stop misleading Americans with their obvious propaganda, maybe we’d actually take climate change more seriously. The Democrats appear to be more afraid of losing congressional votes and the discretionary spending money that goes with all these people moving out of the blue states than they are with climate change. I’m sure that these hard working scientists did not intend for their research to be manipulated in such a diabolically cunning manner. It’s very subtle, and yet obviously deceptive. Climate change is real, but the Democrats really need to stop playing their games. COAL IS A FOSSIL FUEL, so please stop making up your statistics by manipulating the data. Socialism is not, and has never been the answer. If you truly think that Socialism is the best way going forward , then go live in Russia or China. Rs
One word, one small little word can send Hindenburg ego's into meltdown. What this word does is make certain people ' feel dumb' and then the ego demands that the offender be made to ' look dumb' to compensate. ready? GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Watch guys! There are bots throughout this section sharing 'the message'.
All relaying on China 🇨🇳, including Japan, South Korea and India, EU
this year has been the hotest so yup
the dam had a crack and people warned the officials and was ignored.
I wouldn't recommend anybody get their news from ABC
if it's got commercials, it's not news.
Sounds about right
By volume, the dry air in Earth's atmosphere is about 78.08 percent nitrogen, 20.95 percent oxygen, and 0.93 percent argon. A brew of trace gases accounts for the other approximately 0.04 percent, including the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and ozone. To think that a small increase (200 parts per million in the last hundred years) of carbon dioxide would affect the weather is ridiculous.
DO NOT....I repeat, DO NOT pull your head out of your A$$ ! Leave it there !
Is it
Have you seen the video or ink In water
280 vs 540
Ppm
It’s significantly more opaque
Do we both agree that more opaque fluids will retain wavelengths internally for longer ?
This is a basic fact right
So all that left is for you to look up the video
Go look it up
Ink co2 demonstration
You can do it yourself
Ok so so far we covered
A change from 280 -580 is crazy significant
And we both agree it’s happening
All that’s left Bo’s proving co2 is opaque to infra red
Can you handle that or do you disagree with my earlier point
ruclips.net/video/OjD0e1d6GgQ/видео.htmlsi=7S_C6Xk_h1fLQAnk
CO2 and H2O both *resonate* to certain wavelengths then scatter the energy in ALL DIRECTIONS. You must agree solar incoming infrared radiation is 1,000,000x greater than Earth's black body radiation. CO2 resonates with INCOMING infrared and scatters more than half BACK TO SPACE, exactly the same as clouds shield the Earth. Therefore, _ipso facto,_ on a 24-hour basis, CO2 has a NET COOLING effect, as does the thermal Water Cycle of surface evaporation, cloud shielding, and release of vast amounts of energy to upper atmosphere and space.
How CORRUPT climate scientists only discuss black body.
Put another way, _every species alive today has survived known prehistoric periods of 4,000 to 10,000 ppm CO2, and methane is in only parts per BILLION,.
So it' s _infantile, venal, craven, hysterical_ to spread such anti-Science Signs and Tribulations! nonsense, and utterly CORRUPT for Mil.Gov.Sci.Edu to DISAPPEAR those UNAUDITED $100Billions in 'Climate Taxes. They are _picking our pockets_ with half-truths and fatwahs.
*Greens are American Taliban.*
Great you figured out how to google the composition of the atmosphere. Now you seem to think you are educated in earth and climate science lol. The argument you’re making proves you’ve never studied it
Melting from ice age
Cuz Ice age is magic right
It magically gets warmer
What causes a temp change after an ice age ?
@@palebluedot7435 it's called weather.
@@tahertz8544 no weather is the short term variation within a larger system
Climate is the larger system
@@palebluedot7435 if your ice water melts , it gets warmer. Weather doesn't have a timeline. It's what it is and what it was also what it's gonna be. Duh.
@@tahertz8544
No we are in a. Cooling person in an interglacial period
Also no if you ice melts it melts
This can vary from many factors
But temperatures heats up and that new energy melts the ice
Unless your speaking latent energy of crystallization which I doubt because that would be ridiculous in this context
The energy equilibrium of the earth has 3 factors
Sun
Core
Retention
Sun is cooler
Core is same
Energy retention increased
…… that’s the change
Either learn or be quiet
Absolute LIARS!
What is interesting is when all the planets align as they have in the past we have Biblical Floods.
The climate changes as it allways has done .
Never at this rate. You might want to research what caused previous mass extinctions
@@Jc-ms5vvWould you rather it be 63 or 36 Fahrenheit on Christmas day?
Not maintaining damn's cause that accident
Total BS.
You are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts! And there are many highly trained people who have been studying the climate as a career. What is your exposure to climate science? An occasional video on RUclips that you dismiss anyway?!?!
No!CLIMATE DISRUPTION is correct not"change".Cannot be believed if you cannot use correct term💯
China also has 1.4 billion people. The US has 333 million. So per capita the US is by far the biggest emitter of CO2.
Basic facts: the world was in the midst of a global ice age 15,000 years ago that had produced glacier over 5,000 feet thick on the north-eastern part of the North American continent. And that glacial system is what litterally "bull-dozed" out the Great Lakes of America - all five of them. Then about 10,000 years ago the world started to warm and the glaciers gradually melted leaving behind our beautiful Great Lakes, and, ocean level that rose approximately 350 vertical feet over that 10,000 year period. So, in a nutshell, the world got warmer, the glaciers melted, ocean levels rose, and countless landmass the world over were drowned because of Global Warming - that had nothing to do with humans. Climate alarms need to chill and consider taking some valium
How about going back to 1 billion people?
Great idea man, really thinking out of the box
Get on that
You first. And anyone else that's been convinced that we are over populated! So long!
770,000 million people in 1760 started the industrial age.
Co2 breached 300 ppm in April 1912.
That means, if the population stayed the same, this would have happened anyway but just not for 800 years or so.
@@ImproveYourMagicwe can mitigate that
Not that I advise it
I say just be intentional better energy sources
And China's population is more than 4 times bigger, so per capita the US is still on top today.
Politics run this show and they don't care about People suffering. They acctually enjoy it.
Thats the biggest croc of s*** I've heard since the covid scam 😂
WHEN I WANT TO REMOVE CO2 FROM THE ATMOSPHERE I GROW MORE PLANTS...THEY ABSORB CO2 AND RELEASE OXYGEN. GRN LAWNS NEED TO BE REPLACED BY FOREST...PERMACULTURE IS NICE.
Did the math
You try is and see how many trees we need
Remember NEW trees
Not trees where trees already exist
Go ahead do the math and come back and say sorry
DEAR READERS.
SINCE THE WORLD IS ENDING PLEASE GIVE ME ALL YOUR MONEY.
THANK YOU.
No one said the world is ending
It’s simply that we are doing damage that will harm us and future generations
Talk the talks yet the rich became richer and this still happens...nothing changes...when human existing is 0...perhaps the world became SAFE@SAVE.
Lies
You still not getting it,, this is already written,,
Limited facts, lots of here-say.
But will they do a better job than the scientists and covid .
You need to factor in two things missing in your comment. One is the failure of the former president to take the pandemic seriously resulting in hundreds of thousands more deaths. The problem with facing Covid more effectively got off on the wrong foot by China suppressing information about it and two with a former US president who did not take the pandemic seriously, and worse spread misinformation to the public which only made some people less willing to cooperate with guidance from the medical community.
"Be better about building a future," What does that mean exactly?
I think she said, “building better IN the future”.
well what it should mean is, get your dependent ass out of whatever city you depend on and move back onto a farm. Then build a life that farm can naturally sustain. But for lazy narcissists trying to alleviate guilt without having to do anything that inconveniences them, just pretend you are doing something when you split your trash into multiple bins, and drive an electric car.
@@ZennExile
There’s already been research on that. The numbers show that it is not enough land for everyone to live on a farm. Partly because people refuse to live vegan.
Not everyone is able bodied either.
Or financially able.
There are no solutions that can prevent us from reaching 2.0 Celsius in the 2050’s, (that El Niño will peak at 2.5-2.8 Celsius).
It’s not possible to catch something that has abruptly run away.
@@ImproveYourMagic cite that research then? Because you've delusionally asserted that vegan farming takes up less land than holistic farming. So your understanding is flawed and your position is delusional, and I have a feeling that's because there is no research and you are just trying to support a vegan narrative.
In reality, Veganism leads to the death and dismemberment of exponentially more animals than just eating livestock. You don't have to clear all the life off of farmland intended to feed livestock. So the only thing that ends up dying is the livestock.
The solution is for humans to live as part of the ecosystem off of the excess production of that ENTIRE ecosystem. Not just the plants, but all the insects and animals have to be part of the circle of life and decay that actual scientists call "The Carbon Cycle".
Without the Carbon Cycle creating life and storing carbon, all your other delusions can't support their own weight.
All the bleeding heart nonsense you've been taught about human's position in the global ecosystem is a lie.
Humans cannot sustainably continue to inhabit this planet without returning human society back to one supported by the small farm economy and a holistic approach to human nutrition.
That means very simply, we eat absolutely EVERYTHING that doesn't harm us in direct proportion not with how much we can possibly produce per acre of working land, but instead in proportion to how much excess production a naturally thriving ecosystem can produce without catastrophic disruption.
Animals, insects, fruit, plants, EVERYTHING. Your delusional fixation on cash crops and the limits of Industrial Agriculture to produce them in isolation of any sort of sustainable ecosystem IS climate change.
Get Woke. That's someone else's dream you are living in.
LOL!
Lies... It has been sounded for years, just media did no broadcast it!
-57 degrees there what's Russia -12 -14 where I'm from it's only -1 -2 degrees city for city we are nothing pushing for compulsory service forced systematic labor it's what weak criminals do we're the best comparison.
The only solution is to replace fossil fuels with more profitable energy, which is good for the ecosphere. It is possible. It is. I wrote Pluvicopia to show how to take our energy from a much larger energy source, which is the source of life. By enriching life, we can reabsorb CO2, but better than that, we produce for all our needs while releasing natural environments back to nature to rebuild biodiversity. It is easy to do. The physics are simple, and with a bit of work, anyone can understand them.
This was solid information.
you can, physically, walk out of the survivable atmosphere ...pumping huge amounts of chemicals into it is; problematic
Throw some money at it and it goes away
Rally, what's new among scientists, the Earth is warming, at the moment it seems unstoppable, and these "scientists" just figured t out?
Weather has nothing to do with it . Just listen to the CarboNostra Satanist gang.
Seems unstoppable at the moment?
Soooo,…..when do you think it will stop?
@@ImproveYourMagic
When everyone is controlled
@@absmith6237
Controlled in what way?
Except the same science and media people threatened we were going into another ice age repeatedly until the 70's, and gave dates. Look it up. Now we're heating up, and making completely wrong predictions about that. The "scientists" have been completely wrong for decades. It's all propaganda to help politicians do their money laundering.
an executive action must be made. congress wake up y'all.
Solid dams over flow, they don't fail. I am aware of our climate changing. But it's not why my toast burnt this morning.
Thank you Ginger AmaZeeng for your excellent analysis of this latest story of big loss in the human caused climate casino new world we live in. Wonder why the 13 attribution study authors referenced 1.2C when our best climatologists like James Hansen, Paul Beckwith, Peter Kalmus, etc. have reported 1.3-1.4? They also say we’re heading for 1.5C next year. And 2C by 2030. Huston, we have a problem…
There is no "Climate Crisis". There has been no increase in hurricanes, tornadoes, sea levels, wildfires, heatwaves, or wildfires. What happened in Libya, is what happens when you have C.I.A, and U.S State Department, manage a regime change. Infrastructure was destroyed by NATO, and you bought into the propaganda 100%, it's sad...... once again.... there is no "Climate Crisis"
No, you have a problem with your brain? You can call anyone an "expert" you want, but the fact of the matter is they can not predict the future. They have been wrong over and over for 70 years now. You know what normal people do in that situation? They start over from the beginning and analyze if the "so called cause in the hypothesis is actually the cause". You can't come up with a solution if you don't know what is causing the problem. You definitely don't just keep doubling down. You for sure don't tell people your unproven theory is fact just because a group of people agree with you and ignoring every other possibility. That's not science at all , that's a cult or religion. So are you a member of the climate cult or climate religion? Climate Cult sounds better. Wake up! You are being played by world leaders.
@timwmartin12, "best climatologists like James Hansen". Hansen is the second biggest climate liar right behind Michael Mann and his hockey stick. Oh, I forgot about Al Gore and his movie that predicted global devastation by 2018, and the Maldives flooding by 2020...just in case his 2018 prediction was wrong (and it was). BTW, the Maldives are just fine and it is 2023. Lets see, Obama bought a mansion less than 1 meter above sea level, and it hasn't flooded yet.
This report is misleading and biased.
As someone who was alive on the first earth day i can say that i bought into it when i was young but the climate activists (no science envolved) have yet to be right on their predictions even one tiime. They have actually been predicting climate doomsday for over 3000 years now. Lol
Maybe you do some research on previous mass extinctions and compare it to the rate of this one
@@Jc-ms5vv I will if you promise to do the same - read the book "Chicken Little" and you may start to understand my friend!
Falling for big oil propaganda
You're right. The predictions ARE wrong! What was predicted to happen around 2100 is happening now. It is all "Faster Than Expected!"
@@nsbd90now let me explain it like this: Climate activism has nothing to do with climate science. The model they keep showing on tv and news feeds was a worst case scenario base on burning several times the amount of coal that we burned at the peak of coal use. Actually more coal than is extractable. I have a cousin that works at NOAA and a daughter that has a degree in environmental sciences. Also Greta is not a scientist she is an activist. Please step back from the ledge my friend and have the courage to listen to those with a differing opinion. Peace
Hi. Why after 30+ years of climate change predictions they are at 0.0000% right. Absolute 0.0%.
We have to add "made in China" to OUR carbon footprint.
Every single product or part of product produced in China for OUR market (Walmart for instance) means WE should bear a good % of the 'pollution cost'.
Q: What % of China's pollution would be reduced if they were not exporting to the "West"?
🤣🤣🤣🤣 YOU MUST BE VERY SPECIAL
True, but what are the alternatives? We want stuff. We try to reduce the stuff we consume as much as possible, but the solution has to go deeper than that. Please take a look at my comment above.
Answer, maybe lesser but then they would also be a lot poorer. So china has done it more than willingly. It is china carbon footprint, not west. If it would be been produced in west, west would have been richer and china etc poorer.
If we shall put the carbon footprint on the buyer, it should go both ways, and all countries import and export, even west is exporting to china, so then you have to add carbon footprint to china of things that has been produced in the west. So maybe it would not be so big difference.
We need to ban the internet because servers need AC running 24/7to keep from over heating. Internet users are causing global warming!!!
And ban cooking at home too because it produces heat. If you burn the food thats carbon and BAD
China, huh? I guess it could be another communist conspiracy to make the growing season last a week longer in the Midwest. If only it was real.