Some people say that the object used in a 把-sentence must be something specific (and not something vague). So … "He drank water, not beer" should not be translated as: xx 他把水喝掉了，而不是啤酒 xx (assuming we're talking about water in general). Also, some say that the 把-construction *must* be used in certain cases, since a verb cannot be followed by an object and the object's "disposition". So … 请你把沙发搬到客厅 cannot be stated as: xx 请你搬沙发到客厅 xx We could also say that the adverbial 到客厅 must directly follow the verb 搬 and cannot follow the object 沙发.
![Adjective Reduplication in Mandarin Chinese -- AA的 / AABB 的 [Chinese Grammar for AP, IB, HSK]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QJWUyM0YhFI/mqdefault.jpg)
![Adjective Reduplication in Mandarin Chinese -- AA的 / AABB 的 [Chinese Grammar for AP, IB, HSK]](/img/tr.png)
非常好❤
谢谢！
Find your explanations very clear and helpful. I also love the font you use. Which one is it? Thank you.
Thank you!! The font is Yuanti (圆体). :)
Some people say that the object used in a 把-sentence must be something specific (and not something vague). So …
"He drank water, not beer" should not be translated as:
xx 他把水喝掉了，而不是啤酒 xx (assuming we're talking about water in general).
Also, some say that the 把-construction *must* be used in certain cases, since a verb cannot be followed by an object and the object's "disposition". So …
请你把沙发搬到客厅 cannot be stated as:
xx 请你搬沙发到客厅 xx
We could also say that the adverbial 到客厅 must directly follow the verb 搬 and cannot follow the object 沙发.
老师好久不见
好久不见 好久不见! 呵呵 好久没有做视频了 不好意思... 要打起精神，继续努力! 呵呵 😊