DISCLAIMER: This was an experiment purely for fun and doesn't fully replicate a real-life scenario as it is of course done in a flight simulator. And results would vary greatly depending on weather conditions, the airport, aircraft type and so much more... To anyone who wants to know more about autolandings, autolandings use onboard instruments and ground-based systems to guide an aircraft to a safe landing without direct input from the pilots. It increases safety during low-visibility conditions and reduces pilot workload, but pilots are still required to monitor the system and take over if necessary. This isn't a common procedure and almost all landings are manual --------- As for critiquing the landings for what they are: Human landing was early, and firm, and good on centerline Autopilot landing floated a lot (particularly due to the sloped runway) and touched down smoothly. Was quite a bit left of the centerline but nothing horrible. The nose did raise way too high after main gear touched down, that was my fault though as I was rather sloppy on the controls when regaining manual control
This is a unfair comparison between the two as while the autopilot did flare, the nose did rise up due to the air pressure causing the nose to come down in a hard landing but on the humans hand, while the landing was firm, the landing gear is designed to handle these firm landings. And you should also take in account that a “butter” landing isn’t always the best landing (plus Ryanair has good landings idk why everyone thinks that they can’t decently land a plane.)
Guys do you know how an autopilot works? From the moment the main gear touches the ground normally the pilot has control. The autopilot would never flare the front gear up again so the moment it raised up a ”human“ had control!
Actually, the lower one looks more like an Autoland. Autoland isn't designed to achieve a smooth butter landing, it's there to make sure the plane can touch down with an acceptable descend rate without any visibility. So the pitch and flare are stable, with not too many small adjustments like humans normally do, and usually not a butter landing.
@@Sway392 I have heard from pilots that during autoland, the pilots has to see so many parameters at once that they prefer to land manually than autoland. But yes, in zero visibility, its necessary. as then its not about smooth landing but non-crash landing.
@@Issthiu dont need a flare, especially not the one the autopilot did, it floated for too long and likely couldn’t brake which would result in a crash or overrun. so basically human was better bc it was firmer and the brakes would immediately work
Main landing gear touchdown: Autopilot: butter 🧈🧈🧈🧈 Human: Ryanair landing 💀💀💀💀 Front landing gear touchdown: Human: *B U T T E R* 🧈🧈🧈🧈 Autopilot: *R Y A N A I R landing* 💀💀💀💀
Autopilot has a better approach and back gear landing, but it lets the nose up for too long which leads to the aircraft bouncing on the runway. Manual has a rougher landing overall but gets the nose down on time, making the nose gear landing much smoother, preventing the bouncing and braking much earlier. So TL:DR: Autopilot has a smoother rear gear landing but much rougher overall, leading to delayed braking. Manual has much rougher initial landing, but leads to earlier braking and smoother operation overall
1. Autopilot was not in the perfect line 2.human is landed with perfect line 3.human landed more like Ryanair 4.Autopilot was too long to downing the front gear Soo i choose human who agrees? 👇🏿
Autopilot (Emirates): „Shut Up I‘m Landing an A380“ Human (Worked at Emirates and Hired at Ryanair after beeing fired): lets try to break the Front wheel 😁
I think that manual landing is better because sometimes you need to hit the plane on the runway because the wheels send a signal to the engine to open the valve and release the hot air and help in the engine braking process. Note that soft landing is sometimes dangerous and causes the plane to leave the runway.
Autopilot one was controlled by MSFS AI and not to be confused with Airbus Autoland. Both in real life and simulators (MSFS and XP), autoland didn't pass the butter check.
AI had a higher speed on approach, not sure how much I trust that, and they kept their nose gear up so long that it slammed down, the human on the other hand, kept a relatively good speed on approach, and had both main, and nose gear down on the ground pretty quick. When it comes to comfort, I think the AI did good on the initial main gear touch down, but the human did better at a quick touch down.
DISCLAIMER:
This was an experiment purely for fun and doesn't fully replicate a real-life scenario as it is of course done in a flight simulator. And results would vary greatly depending on weather conditions, the airport, aircraft type and so much more...
To anyone who wants to know more about autolandings, autolandings use onboard instruments and ground-based systems to guide an aircraft to a safe landing without direct input from the pilots. It increases safety during low-visibility conditions and reduces pilot workload, but pilots are still required to monitor the system and take over if necessary. This isn't a common procedure and almost all landings are manual
---------
As for critiquing the landings for what they are:
Human landing was early, and firm, and good on centerline
Autopilot landing floated a lot (particularly due to the sloped runway) and touched down smoothly. Was quite a bit left of the centerline but nothing horrible. The nose did raise way too high after main gear touched down, that was my fault though as I was rather sloppy on the controls when regaining manual control
But i would know its xplane
Human on top
Dud this ain't gmail
Game name
It is Microsoft flight Simulator
Which one was better? ❌
Which one was butter? ✅
Autopilot best😊
Nah humas
Humans
Autopilot
Smooth like butta like a cwiminal undacovah
Human: Ryanair
Auto:ooooooo yeahhh let's butter
But it was very late making it unsafe
@@Tyhanson0315It wasn’t even late learn your aviation dude
Human
Autopilot: Lets have a flare…Landed!
Manual: ThAnK yOu FoR fLyInG rYaNaIr!
Bruh
This is a unfair comparison between the two as while the autopilot did flare, the nose did rise up due to the air pressure causing the nose to come down in a hard landing but on the humans hand, while the landing was firm, the landing gear is designed to handle these firm landings. And you should also take in account that a “butter” landing isn’t always the best landing (plus Ryanair has good landings idk why everyone thinks that they can’t decently land a plane.)
@@zhangletjuthey want it fast that's all
Autopilot: lets butter
Human: thank you for flying ryanair
😐
Last year, over 90% of our flights arrived.
I m rayan
Human was better
My name is rayan
I like the way the autopilot landed the back wheels, but the nose wheels were up too high for too long.
When the wheels are up its called a flare by the way
@@BShala-g5lhe means the back wheels was on the ground but the front gear was up for a while
Buddy anything less than a tail strike is good. The more nose up on landing the better.
Guys do you know how an autopilot works?
From the moment the main gear touches the ground normally the pilot has control. The autopilot would never flare the front gear up again so the moment it raised up a ”human“ had control!
@@Random_AviatorYTthat’s aero-braking, not sure what the utility of it is for airliners but for the f-16 it’s kinda required to land it
Centerline:human
Smooth:autopilot
Nose touchdown:human
Early:Human
Late:robot
Ryanair : both 😂😂
Actually, the lower one looks more like an Autoland.
Autoland isn't designed to achieve a smooth butter landing, it's there to make sure the plane can touch down with an acceptable descend rate without any visibility.
So the pitch and flare are stable, with not too many small adjustments like humans normally do, and usually not a butter landing.
Is that why most landings are done manually? Because the Pilot can achieve a smoother landing than the autopilot feature?
@@Sway392 No not because of that, in CAT 3 conditions with very little visibility Autoland is a requirement
@@Sway392 I have heard from pilots that during autoland, the pilots has to see so many parameters at once that they prefer to land manually than autoland. But yes, in zero visibility, its necessary. as then its not about smooth landing but non-crash landing.
Mde
Very wrong. its trying to stay alive not die
Autopilot buttered 👌
-which one was better-
Which one was butter
Human be like:
Emirates: Your Fired
RyanAir: Your Hired
You're*
I had to admit, autopilot is better and absolutely buttered it
Duh because the pilot didn’t even flare
@@Issthi Yeah I know, the pilot barely flared.
@@Issthiu dont need a flare, especially not the one the autopilot did, it floated for too long and likely couldn’t brake which would result in a crash or overrun. so basically human was better bc it was firmer and the brakes would immediately work
BUTTER 😂
pilot did flare
In some cases the autopilot was better but in others manual was
Personally i trust a computer more than a human. Way too many human errors in crashes
@@dioritbajrami8283nah but about this part u should trust humans more
@@dioritbajrami8283yeah but there are thousands of flights in the air and we barely have any casualties,
@@dioritbajrami8283 Airplane landing is way too easy to make a mistake) Seriously. This is just looks hard
My eyes:↗️↘️↗️↘️↗️↘️↗️↘️↗️↘️
Autopilot: pro butter machine
Human: ryanair pilot
Emrates: you're fired
Spirt: your hired (why does it say alcohol idk did i want it to no) HAPPY NOW?!?
Spirt💀
@@Ninotipinoti Alcohol 💀
@@Ninotipinotiwhy does it say alcohol when i translate it 💀
oh come on boyzbennicer thats ryanair not apirit 🤡
@@CattableYT. wha-
Both pretty good 👍
Bro straight up didn't flare 💀
Main landing gear touchdown:
Autopilot: butter 🧈🧈🧈🧈
Human: Ryanair landing 💀💀💀💀
Front landing gear touchdown:
Human: *B U T T E R* 🧈🧈🧈🧈
Autopilot: *R Y A N A I R landing* 💀💀💀💀
Human absolutely slammed it into the ground
Autopilot: BUTTER OR ELSE..!
Human: LAND ANYWAY IDC RYANAIRRRRRR
Autopilot: super Butter
Human:
Ryan air
Autopilot almost recreated history with that landing💀💀💀💀
You menat human
I
the pilot
Fed ex
Auto pilot-i will put butter on your bread
Human-me pooo on u
Autopilot : used at Etihad
Manuel : used in Ryanair
Ok, now let me know next time youre in a plane if you prefer to land with an ai instead of Manuel.
Nah Manuel is used in Aeromexico
Autopilot: flares*
Human: nose dive to the runway 😅
Both were rather rough, but I’d say the autopilot was slightly smoother.
It’s easy to be first, but it’s hard to be last
Autopilot one was smoother, manual one was more centerlined
Obviously Human
Ryanair: YOUR HIRED 🎉🎉🎉🎉
Autopilot: average pilot landing
Human: Ryanair
❤ Autopilot mode: (Plane vibrating)
Autopilot made a butter landing!🧈🛬
They where both quite hard but the autopilot was better
Auto pilot: BUTTER 🧈
Human:ThAnK yOu fOr FlYiNg RyAn air
Auto pilot:it is butter
Manual:RYANAYIR!!!!!!!
auto pilot
Auto pilot in plane✈ ❌❌
Ghost in plane ✈ ✔️✔️
🛫🏢🏢
@@8XTO that ain't funny bud
@@mategumbagumba I’m from Turkiye and America Is supporting feto and PKK-YPG its teror I hate America
Autopilot has a better approach and back gear landing, but it lets the nose up for too long which leads to the aircraft bouncing on the runway. Manual has a rougher landing overall but gets the nose down on time, making the nose gear landing much smoother, preventing the bouncing and braking much earlier.
So TL:DR: Autopilot has a smoother rear gear landing but much rougher overall, leading to delayed braking. Manual has much rougher initial landing, but leads to earlier braking and smoother operation overall
1. Autopilot was not in the perfect line
2.human is landed with perfect line
3.human landed more like Ryanair
4.Autopilot was too long to downing the front gear
Soo i choose human who agrees?
👇🏿
Your supposed to keep the nose up as long as you can to bleed off speed
Gotta give it to autopilot
The autopilot activated the reverse thrust too early
No
I would say human is better, not for the quality, but for the safety. Rougher landings are actually safer than smooth ones, and more efficient.
fr, got a point. (got it, because I finished my sentence with a point )
I swear to never do bad jokes again
I feel sorry for y'all
Auto pilot team
⬇️
team auto pilot is better
👇
That’s true
Autopilot (Emirates): „Shut Up I‘m Landing an A380“
Human (Worked at Emirates and Hired at Ryanair after beeing fired): lets try to break the Front wheel 😁
For autopilot the flare was nice
It’s not wuman, It’s a Ryanair pilot!
bro just broke everyones spine with the human landing
Autopilot: Thank you for flying emirates 😊
Human: LaSt YeAr, OvEr 90% oF oUr FliGhtS aRriVed oN tiMe!!!1!1!
Autopilot by a long shot 😂
Auto pilot: let’s butter this landing
Human: nahh I would rather take center line
Human: Welcome to Ryanair
Autopilot: 💥💥
Human:thAnK yUo fOr fLyiNg wiTh RyAnaiR!
manual - little bit bumpy but on the line
autopilot - smooth but off centre
Human: thanks for flying ryanair
Autopilot: let's eat some butter
Ryanair: You are hired!
The autopilot really wanted to pop a wheely 💀
Human: Take necessary steps immediately based on situation.
Autopilot: Pre-programmed😂
Autopilot definitely
Autopilot buttered it🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Ryanair: ur hired
I think that manual landing is better because sometimes you need to hit the plane on the runway because the wheels send a signal to the engine to open the valve and release the hot air and help in the engine braking process. Note that soft landing is sometimes dangerous and causes the plane to leave the runway.
Autopilot👍👍👍
Human: 👍
Autopilot was like butter
Autopilot:let's land! 😊
Human:ThaNk YoU fOr fLyiNg rYaNaIr!!!!!!
Autopilot was a lot smoother and actually flared but human was in touchdown zone
Manual was pretty good I think manual wins
As long at the plane gets to the gate, that’s all we want
Autopilot: BUTTER!!!
Human: Ryanair landing
Human: Welcome to ryanair!
autopilot: nooo i failed to butter
human: flaring? never heard that
Human for efficiency autopilot for comfort
Rather than who lands with more butter, wouldn't it be more important to consider who lands more safely?
Autopilot: let’s have a flare
Humans: RYANAIR!💀💀💀your cooked
Autopilot: Tailstrike
Human : THANK YOU FOR FLYING RYAN AIR
*gear falls*
Auto:We have landed
Manual:THANK YOU FOR FLYING RYANAIR or WIZZ AIR
autopilot: gear good, rip centerline
human: centerline good, rip gear
Autopilot: smooth and good
Human:a little ruff but smooth
Autopilot was smoooooooooth
autopilot: 🧈
human: *_THANK YOU FOR FLYING RYANAIR_*
Human was more on straight but rough while autopilot was smooth
I preper the Autopilot because the landing was very smooth like a butter
Autopilot was like Ryanair landing 💀💀
Autopilot one was controlled by MSFS AI and not to be confused with Airbus Autoland. Both in real life and simulators (MSFS and XP), autoland didn't pass the butter check.
autopilot: flare.
human: *ryanair landing intro noises* DANK U FOR FLYING RYANAIR. LAST YEAR,90% OF OUR FLIGHTS MADE IT TO THE AIRPORT-
Sometimes the human makes very butter landings
Autopilot. Butter the bread? ❤❤❤😂😂😂❤
Ryanair’s smoothest landing:
Autopilot:🧈
Human: ThAnK YoU FoR FLyiNg RyAnAiR
I gotta say that autopilot was better! 😂
ap: was smooth, but the bounce ruined it
human: was not that smooth but was better
umm definitely ill choose autopilot because its even more smother!
Autopilot disables after touchdown so basically in any case, pilot has to be fully prepared to land and steer the aircraft post touchdown... 😊😂
The Autopilot was better because it did a very realistic Butter landing but Human was a Ryanair pilot
The flare in the human’s landing went on vacation
Human for rayner❤
Anyway, manual landing is better because autopilot is a man-made product.
Autopilot is better in this situation
AI had a higher speed on approach, not sure how much I trust that, and they kept their nose gear up so long that it slammed down, the human on the other hand, kept a relatively good speed on approach, and had both main, and nose gear down on the ground pretty quick. When it comes to comfort, I think the AI did good on the initial main gear touch down, but the human did better at a quick touch down.
Autopilot but Manual landing is important according to traning.
Autopilot is soft but has slow touchdown while manual is much faster but a little rough so manual is better
Tbh the human landing had too much vertical speed, causing it to hit hard. But the autopilot can lead to overshooting the runway 😢.