The most realistic animation and accurate representation of the sinking would still go to Titanic: Honour and Glory, 2024 sinking animation. It’s coloured, very smooth, and the animation is the most realistic i’ve seen. This videos animation is good and would be even better with colour, but wouldn’t ever beat the animation made by Titanic: Honour and Glory
@@handsomemann01if you mean the ship itself, probably, if you are talking about the sinking animation, I can tell it’s in Roblox, the ship was just made grey and the lighting have no shadows, etc.
Want to point out some unsung heros of the titanic. The engineering team stayed in their stations, using the last of her steam to power the ship to keep the lights on for as long as possible, also controlling her ballest tanks to stop it from tiling when taking on water. That allowed all lifeboats to be deployed on the left and right sides of the ship. When they were finally told to leave their posts, all lifeboats had already gone. None of the engineers survived the sinking
Ngl, this is so accurate and just fire in general, if you colorized the model i would watch it all the time, (would also make it an S on a tier list, but in this form its an A)
Pretty great. My only recomendations for improvement would be having the 4th funnel break off in the descent, lights going out in sections. Keep up the great work :)
Did they make this song for the game? if so that is INSANE dedication, it is incredibly hart to get an entire wind and brass band to make a song for a Roblox game.
Hi, I have a question about the theory, It shows the starboard (In several gameplay videos I saw) list to get over 5 degrees and get up to 8 degrees? I was wondering if I could ask about the logic for the starboard list being this heavy, for example, if their were any accounts that suggest it? Great game and video aswell btw, keep up the great work :)
@@lochlanmuir2291 I agree with their being starboard list after collision as many witnesses testified it. What I meant was for it being 8 degrees, if there were any accounts of it going over 5 degrees? 5 degrees comes from testimony of Quartermaster Hitchens about the captain noting a 5 degree starboard list at 11:45 - 11:50.
Right, it was both. She listed to port just slightly prior to the collision due to the shifted coal from the now-extinguished coal fire, but all of the water entering the hull on the starboard side gave her a list in that direction. Around the time Scotland road began to flood, she returned to something of an even keel, more or less. Either the unhampered flooding of Scotland road or the opening of the D deck reception room's gangway door (it's not entirely certain the door was actually left open, there's conflicting testimony) gave the ship a strong list to the port side. Right around the time the wheelhouse went under, the ship lurched back to something of an even keel and stayed that way until she broke apart and sank completely.
@@SaraRoseVaughan we know the that the gangway door was probably opened that night, however there's conflicting testimonies on whether or not it did stay open. I do not think it remained open due to the fact that lifeboat 6 couldn't have been lowered down if it was.
@@PietroLombardo-b4c The door is open on the wreck, though that could be a case just like the blown out cargo hatch- blasted off its hinges by the sudden shifting of water inside the bow.
Can you add back the other style sinkings like a night to remember, titanic 1997, james cameron 2012 and v-break whilst also new ones like titanic 1953 and roy mengot 1985?
@@Rudnaz_127 Just to clarify a few things: 1. The 1997 Theory and the James Cameron 2012 Theory have been added into the game. With 1997 being most beloved and the 2012 Theory being almost accurate with a few inaccuracies. 2. The game is striving for accuracy and we are reliving a tragic event that happened back in 1912. The V-Break Theory has been widely debunked by Titanic experts and historians, it also doesn't align with the evidence found at the wreck site. A Night to Remember, although considered the most accurate in terms of character portrayals, is however inaccurate on how the ship sank, as it doesn't have the ship split in two near the end. This was because at the time, no one believed that the ship actually split despite many survivor testimonies saying so. That is, until the wreck was discovered by Robert Ballard on 1st September 1985, revealing that the ship had indeed broken in two. 3. While it would be fun to play, it's best if we rely on accuracy rather than inaccuracy, when the game is supposed to be a memorial to all those lives lost. It would be kind of disrespectful.
I disagree. Here is my logic and reasoning - Several accounts from a range of angles said they saw a third section. Other survivors testified different break locations which can be accounted for with sections. The wreck even supports this. A counter arguement is how would it end up where it did. Here is my logic for this. As said by another enthusiast, the forward tower is 4km under and 600 (i think,) metres from the wreck. It would only have to move forward by 1 metre every 6 metres it goes down. If it slid partially into the sea, this would give it more likely to get their aswell. The corridors such as the promenade would allow for water to flow through rather than build up. Their would be not alot of drag even though the current would be going the opposite direction due to layout. It might have also collapsed to the starboard side when it broke off to account for how it was far east when the ship listed to starboard in break. Another counter argument is how would the survivors who said it broke forward of the third funnel not notice the break location having moved back. Here is my logic. The bow would have seperated before the tower fell showing a break infront of the third funnel that they would have noticed. Some said it broke in the middle. They would have guessed it broke their, for example Arthur Bright instead of being more specific that it broke forward of the third funnel as the third funnel falling could have confused them as where it broke. They would have also used the funnels to dtermine break location so wouldnt be a 100% sure where it was as thee third funnel fell. Those who said it broke forward might not have noticed due to the funnel falling that there was a break behind and those that did could have guessed it was engines breaking out and not thought it was actually a third section. Those that didnt specifiy or said it broke in the middle may have said this as they werent able to determine break location due to third funnel falling and tower breaking off so guessed it broke in the middle OR didnt say.
this might just be me, but the port list looks a little too much also if you can it would look a lot better if you could make it look somewhat jagged when it breaks, because it just being flat looks a little weird
the port list is supposed to be that high. its what the survivors said happened there are nearly 20 cases of survivors saying that they thought the ship would capsize, a 9 degree port list is way too little to cause that. The list you see here is 15 degrees
I feel that none of the sinking theories ever understand that, the breakup has to be at a point in which boilers spilling out would be visible, because some survivors actually saw that. So essentially the breakup, down to almost the Keel itself needs to be visible above the water line for at least a little bit.
I assume you are referring to Frank Osman's testimony, where he says that it seemed to him as if the engines slid out onto the bow. However, he was not in a good position to see such a thing, as Boat 2 was facing the ship from an aft-starboard direction, and close to it as well. He could've just heard the sounds of the breakup and assumed that the engines slid out (which is somewhat accurate, as the forward starboard engine is thought to have slid out during the breakup). Also, it would be pyshically impossible for the stern to settle back with the lower decks almost completely exposed.
@@CPorter Perhaps, but his testimony indicates that it only appeared as if debris was sliding out, seeing as he uses "it seemed to me" before describing it.
this theory is based off actual reserch and analysis. not your stupid 1997 theory. time to wake up people. this is based with survivors in mind not action.
Don't take the 1997 movie as ACCURATE take other more recent animation of titanic sinking, almost all of them shows the 2nd funnel collapsing. @@davey_capuchin
@@davey_capuchin you know the movie is fabricated. the second funnel falls "...The second funnel, large enough for two automobiles to pass through abreast, seemed to be lifted off, emitting a cloud of sparks It looked as if it would fall on top of me. It missed me by only twenty or thirty feet. The Suction of it drew me down and down struggling and swimming, practically spent."- Jack Thayer
@@USTUGS in fact all fourth of Titanic funnel collapse, the first, the second, the third on the breakup and the last one on the rear collapse during the ship taking final plunge
wdym, in the james cameron movie the ship doesnt even have any list to port or starboard, and in movie it doesnt split in middle but between 4th and 3rd funnel
@@Wolfric_Rogers no it didn't. If it did then there would have been more eyewitnesses to it. Most eyewitnesses thought they heard something breaking up but didn't witness anything. If the ship broke at such a steep angle there would have been no doubt. In the meantime until the ship was discovered it was assumed that it sank intact. And after further Evidence was found at the wreck it was determined that it was impossible for the ship to have achieved such a high angle before breaking apart. The new Theory based on evidence is that the propellers were barely out of the water when it broke apart
@zexionii2024 .. Don't ask him to elaborate...He seems pretty undereducated explaining these stuff...Or, maybe english isn't his primary language. .so he's a bit short of words...Phuck him as of now... Don't you guyz follow Titanic: Honor & Glory's official YT ?... They're gonna livestream the sinking on April 14th. . like the previous year. . with some changes of course... .
![[SFM] Risky Recital](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RzNkY1_Nk3o/mqdefault.jpg)
1:19 "I hope you enjoy your time together!"
"I put the diamond in the coat...AND I PUT THE COAT ON HER!!!"
"I give it to you... If you can get it."
Take it !… Take IT!
IF YOU CAN GET IT!
Lovejoy : Coward
@@theforgottenone687lovejoy says bastard not coward
I think they will, Cal
Love to see realism and attention to detail in this sinking. Looking forward to more updates!
Tomorrow, friday, at 16:30 PM will be the southaptom update
@gatoconstrutor9101 I do not play this game anymore
@@Larsonteevee well, but will update
Considering this is done in roblox, add some color to the ship and this is the most accurate sinking animation ever built in roblox!
The most realistic animation and accurate representation of the sinking would still go to Titanic: Honour and Glory, 2024 sinking animation. It’s coloured, very smooth, and the animation is the most realistic i’ve seen. This videos animation is good and would be even better with colour, but wouldn’t ever beat the animation made by Titanic: Honour and Glory
I dont think it was made in roblox, i think they use 3d animation software and export it into roblox
@@handsomemann01if you mean the ship itself, probably, if you are talking about the sinking animation, I can tell it’s in Roblox, the ship was just made grey and the lighting have no shadows, etc.
@@Dup1o.2 why would they use roblox studio when they have blender to autodesk?
Want to point out some unsung heros of the titanic. The engineering team stayed in their stations, using the last of her steam to power the ship to keep the lights on for as long as possible, also controlling her ballest tanks to stop it from tiling when taking on water. That allowed all lifeboats to be deployed on the left and right sides of the ship. When they were finally told to leave their posts, all lifeboats had already gone. None of the engineers survived the sinking
Poor guys, at least they died knowing they saved hundreds of lives.
Ngl, this is so accurate and just fire in general, if you colorized the model i would watch it all the time, (would also make it an S on a tier list, but in this form its an A)
Very accurate depiction! Well researched, well done
I love the added detail of the lights turning red
This is my titanic sinking theory
Well done! Much better than that other animation going around.
Add boilers
You also forgot the engine room
No
@@MamaOmni bro have you not see the mistakes in this video
@@StephentrainboyRailfanbrony no
Why? This was about the sinking not a virtual tour of the ship. Smh
2:50 dreak the ship
Pretty great. My only recomendations for improvement would be having the 4th funnel break off in the descent, lights going out in sections. Keep up the great work :)
Very decent video well done
2:20 This is where the hogging becomes too much for the ship to handle
I like the titanic sos music
Wonderful 😎
THIS VIDEO IS VERY GOOD,AND I HOPE THERE ARE MORE THINGS LIKE THIS
I love the game and I play on it more then others can’t wait for more updates
can i suggest the ship rocking from port to starboard as the list rights itself
amazing
🫃
real time confirmed
So painful that the ship is tearing apart in the bottom of the ocean, even one of the railing ripped apart
This game is amazing!
Very interesting. Will there be any more sinking animations added into the game?
1997 is already here and we are going to get 2016 and 2012
@@RobloxianXwhat about one piece theory
@@Masterchief_Titomaybe It adds
But ill be honest man i would like 53/58 sinking on randomized.
@@Masterchief_Tito there used to be one piece theory from 1958, but it got deleted i think in the new V2 update
@@jazdajazda2191 I know that
Did they make this song for the game? if so that is INSANE dedication, it is incredibly hart to get an entire wind and brass band to make a song for a Roblox game.
There is such a thing as digital song making you know
Hi, I have a question about the theory,
It shows the starboard (In several gameplay videos I saw) list to get over 5 degrees and get up to 8 degrees? I was wondering if I could ask about the logic for the starboard list being this heavy, for example, if their were any accounts that suggest it?
Great game and video aswell btw, keep up the great work :)
It’s physically impossible to not have a starboard list. It hit on the starboard side
@@lochlanmuir2291 I agree with their being starboard list after collision as many witnesses testified it. What I meant was for it being 8 degrees, if there were any accounts of it going over 5 degrees?
5 degrees comes from testimony of Quartermaster Hitchens about the captain noting a 5 degree starboard list at 11:45 - 11:50.
woulnd th big piece have fallen off during the sinking down not at the surface?
Cool
Please bring back real time sinking
i would love to see this finished
Perfect game
2:58 : my electricity!! noo my electricity bill!!!
1:58 first time noticing this song has some movie song stuff in it
3:15 "Jack, Jack whats happening Jack?"
Sir this is a wendy's
Titanic was kinda Port listed. Not Starboard listed.
no it was both, it listed to starboard until around 1:15, and then it listed to port until the final plunge when it rightened itself.
Learn more better kid. I agree with this person above me
Right, it was both. She listed to port just slightly prior to the collision due to the shifted coal from the now-extinguished coal fire, but all of the water entering the hull on the starboard side gave her a list in that direction. Around the time Scotland road began to flood, she returned to something of an even keel, more or less. Either the unhampered flooding of Scotland road or the opening of the D deck reception room's gangway door (it's not entirely certain the door was actually left open, there's conflicting testimony) gave the ship a strong list to the port side. Right around the time the wheelhouse went under, the ship lurched back to something of an even keel and stayed that way until she broke apart and sank completely.
@@SaraRoseVaughan we know the that the gangway door was probably opened that night, however there's conflicting testimonies on whether or not it did stay open. I do not think it remained open due to the fact that lifeboat 6 couldn't have been lowered down if it was.
@@PietroLombardo-b4c The door is open on the wreck, though that could be a case just like the blown out cargo hatch- blasted off its hinges by the sudden shifting of water inside the bow.
U should do more sinking ships
Do more of the sos sinkings or are they from Titanic sos?
What is the app that you made this called?
Please anwser me
@@GalaxE0zblender
I think the light went down so far early
It’s too high out of the water, but overall very well done.
Can you add back the other style sinkings like a night to remember, titanic 1997, james cameron 2012 and v-break whilst also new ones like titanic 1953 and roy mengot 1985?
No. All are inaccurate. This one, however, IS accurate
@@lochlanmuir2291 idc if they're innaccurate, they're fun to play and will be interesting to play.
@@Rudnaz_127 well I care and it's annoying
@@kadenrobinson7067 Well then, we've got different damn opinions.
@@Rudnaz_127 Just to clarify a few things:
1. The 1997 Theory and the James Cameron 2012 Theory have been added into the game. With 1997 being most beloved and the 2012 Theory being almost accurate with a few inaccuracies.
2. The game is striving for accuracy and we are reliving a tragic event that happened back in 1912. The V-Break Theory has been widely debunked by Titanic experts and historians, it also doesn't align with the evidence found at the wreck site. A Night to Remember, although considered the most accurate in terms of character portrayals, is however inaccurate on how the ship sank, as it doesn't have the ship split in two near the end. This was because at the time, no one believed that the ship actually split despite many survivor testimonies saying so. That is, until the wreck was discovered by Robert Ballard on 1st September 1985, revealing that the ship had indeed broken in two.
3. While it would be fun to play, it's best if we rely on accuracy rather than inaccuracy, when the game is supposed to be a memorial to all those lives lost. It would be kind of disrespectful.
athos theory? 😱
Actually it’s mi’s theory
Actually Boat C and D Bug. Davids cant swing back to lowering.
Make a new version of titanic honor and glory 2024
pls add 2006 sinking
Yo ask groovy domino for the air pockets to improve the game more
his lungs bursted
@@edenabad4216 makes sense
@@Averagebloxy not to mention he can't move for over 30 days
2:52
is this blender
Yes Roblox Titanic SOS 😂😅 Difficult control boat like
good theory, but the forward tower dosent come off (at least that’s what tamity said)
well, it very well could have come off. That area of Titanic was under a lot of stress, due to Titanic, basically falling apart near the 3rd funnel.
@@Roman-R-2009 thanks.
@@AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHJHH yea, no problem.
I disagree. Here is my logic and reasoning -
Several accounts from a range of angles said they saw a third section. Other survivors testified different break locations which can be accounted for with sections. The wreck even supports this.
A counter arguement is how would it end up where it did. Here is my logic for this. As said by another enthusiast, the forward tower is 4km under and 600 (i think,) metres from the wreck. It would only have to move forward by 1 metre every 6 metres it goes down. If it slid partially into the sea, this would give it more likely to get their aswell. The corridors such as the promenade would allow for water to flow through rather than build up. Their would be not alot of drag even though the current would be going the opposite direction due to layout. It might have also collapsed to the starboard side when it broke off to account for how it was far east when the ship listed to starboard in break.
Another counter argument is how would the survivors who said it broke forward of the third funnel not notice the break location having moved back. Here is my logic. The bow would have seperated before the tower fell showing a break infront of the third funnel that they would have noticed. Some said it broke in the middle. They would have guessed it broke their, for example Arthur Bright instead of being more specific that it broke forward of the third funnel as the third funnel falling could have confused them as where it broke. They would have also used the funnels to dtermine break location so wouldnt be a 100% sure where it was as thee third funnel fell. Those who said it broke forward might not have noticed due to the funnel falling that there was a break behind and those that did could have guessed it was engines breaking out and not thought it was actually a third section. Those that didnt specifiy or said it broke in the middle may have said this as they werent able to determine break location due to third funnel falling and tower breaking off so guessed it broke in the middle OR didnt say.
Add color
Is this the Roblox S.O.S titanic?
There happened the split 2:57
0:06
Titanic Theory 2012
The ships lights yellow to orange
they just slowly dimmed the further the ship lost power
I don't like the new background music they've put, It doesn't feel like you're really there.
I rathe the band music.
Good thing you can enable that
this might just be me, but the port list looks a little too much
also if you can it would look a lot better if you could make it look somewhat jagged when it breaks, because it just being flat looks a little weird
the port list is supposed to be that high. its what the survivors said happened
there are nearly 20 cases of survivors saying that they thought the ship would capsize, a 9 degree port list is way too little to cause that. The list you see here is 15 degrees
omg
That's more like it
Luckily it didn't hit a bridge.
Oof bro too soon 😂
Too soon
I feel that none of the sinking theories ever understand that, the breakup has to be at a point in which boilers spilling out would be visible, because some survivors actually saw that. So essentially the breakup, down to almost the Keel itself needs to be visible above the water line for at least a little bit.
I assume you are referring to Frank Osman's testimony, where he says that it seemed to him as if the engines slid out onto the bow. However, he was not in a good position to see such a thing, as Boat 2 was facing the ship from an aft-starboard direction, and close to it as well. He could've just heard the sounds of the breakup and assumed that the engines slid out (which is somewhat accurate, as the forward starboard engine is thought to have slid out during the breakup).
Also, it would be pyshically impossible for the stern to settle back with the lower decks almost completely exposed.
@@HugoGHA true I guess that could be a case of that. But I think he definitely saw something falling out rather than hearing it only.
@@CPorter Perhaps, but his testimony indicates that it only appeared as if debris was sliding out, seeing as he uses "it seemed to me" before describing it.
@@HugoGHA fair
Angle is too high, should be 23-25, degrees maximum in the animation it seems reaching nearly 40-45
in the game the angle only reaches 29 degrees in the sinking simulation
the angles you have put are too high. Titanic reached 22 degrees maximum.
Its a ok game but the sky box is bad
Add boilers and engine rooms
TITANIC SOS (SLOWED)
Another one bites the dust
this theory is based off actual reserch and analysis. not your stupid 1997 theory. time to wake up people. this is based with survivors in mind not action.
Most people know that the 1997 sinking theory is wrong it’s just that it’s iconic and it’s really cool to see the ship at a 45 degree angle
@@zachgarbett1630its not, plus I hate when people say it is at 45 degrees or depict it.
@ ok right, it’s the same through if people genuinely think that it was the James Cameron style sink
2rd funnel dosent collapse
it does
@@USTUGS I see it in the movie 2nd funnel didnt fall so it’s DOSENT fall
Don't take the 1997 movie as ACCURATE take other more recent animation of titanic sinking, almost all of them shows the 2nd funnel collapsing. @@davey_capuchin
@@davey_capuchin you know the movie is fabricated. the second funnel falls
"...The second funnel, large enough for two automobiles to pass through abreast, seemed to be lifted off, emitting a cloud of sparks It looked as if it would fall on top of me. It missed me by only twenty or thirty feet. The Suction of it drew me down and down struggling and swimming, practically spent."- Jack Thayer
@@USTUGS in fact all fourth of Titanic funnel collapse, the first, the second, the third on the breakup and the last one on the rear collapse during the ship taking final plunge
I guess you watched James Cameron film of Titanic sinking which is incorrect. 🤘
wdym, in the james cameron movie the ship doesnt even have any list to port or starboard, and in movie it doesnt split in middle but between 4th and 3rd funnel
I think you need glasses cuz this is so much different with james cameron film
Too much of an angle. It has been disproven that the ships Stern raised so high into the air before it broke.
Actually, it probably did reach quite a high angle, with the third funnel about half-submerged.
This isn't that high, Titanic rose to about 23°
More like 30.
@@Wolfric_Rogers no it didn't. If it did then there would have been more eyewitnesses to it. Most eyewitnesses thought they heard something breaking up but didn't witness anything. If the ship broke at such a steep angle there would have been no doubt. In the meantime until the ship was discovered it was assumed that it sank intact. And after further Evidence was found at the wreck it was determined that it was impossible for the ship to have achieved such a high angle before breaking apart. The new Theory based on evidence is that the propellers were barely out of the water when it broke apart
@@1989gibbi
..The "New Theory" is indeed wrong!!..It was disproven by many Titanic historians & researchers...Go. .read some... .
❤😂🎉😢😮😅😊
Incorrect sinking
How??
@@zexionii2024 it means what it says..
@zexionii2024
.. Don't ask him to elaborate...He seems pretty undereducated explaining these stuff...Or, maybe english isn't his primary language. .so he's a bit short of words...Phuck him as of now... Don't you guyz follow Titanic: Honor & Glory's official YT ?... They're gonna livestream the sinking on April 14th. . like the previous year. . with some changes of course... .
@@Thel2552 How is the sinking innaccurate?
Actually the sinking is one 100% correct
The james cameron version is absolutely unrealistic
Cool