God showed me about the KJV. I had no idea about "KJO" stuff. My brother had just died, but had given me a KJV bible shortly before his death. I picked it up only because I needed the concordance. Then I found myself comparing that bible with the NASB I'd used for 18 years, along with my newer NIV. I was shocked to discover the differences, which only God could've shown me. It was then I began learning about versions, but my trust in God's word has never faltered. I know what he showed me.
Having read KJV all my life, when I started to read different versions to compare them, I was "that's not what the bible says". It threw me off and I couldn't continue because it was too confusing.
Same here. I don't agree with the modern versions, they lower the meanings and the next thing you know, they'll have the not so serious context, nothing to worry about. It's causing them to err rather than be prepared to the Spiritual Warfare.
you did no such thing. The KJV and other translations do NOT say different things unless of course you are too dumb to be able to read the same thing in different translations and understand it. Jesus didn't speak in KJV english. He didn't even speak in English at all which is probably news to you.
@@rosaliebent4833 You are using weak arguments while you try to defend the modern translations. Let me help... You need help... You said: "you did no such thing." Response: This is where you started, so this is where I will start. 1. How do you know? 2. Can you prove that he "did no such thing."? No. You can't. Now, can I prove that the modern translations do say totally different things? Yes. Acts 8:37 in the modern English translations: ....... Omitted **In the modern translations they actually go from Acts 8:38 to Acts 8:38 The modern translators can't even count!** Acts 8:37 And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. **If you would like to know *WHY* the "Church of Christ" (cult) translator wanted that verse taken out of the text I am willing to show you why.** I John 5:7 in the modern English translations: 1Jn 5:7 And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is the truth. (Revised version) 1Jn 5:7 There are three witnesses: (Good News Bible) 1Jn 5:7 And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is the truth. (American Standard version) 1Jn 5:7 For there are three that testify: (New American Standard version) I John 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. *The King James Bible* (God's pure preserved word: in English for English speaking people) You will notice in the modern versions we see that 2 *MAJOR* Bible doctrines are changed, attacked, weakened and removed: A. The Trinity. B. The Deity of Jesus Christ. I can give you numerous translation errors that are found in modern translations. The modern versions weaken *MAJOR* Bible doctrines. You said: "The KJV and other translations do NOT say different things unless of course you are too dumb to be able to read the same thing in different translations and understand it." Response: That is an emotional response. Those kinds of responses are due to weak faith. The word of God will strengthen your faith in God & God's word. Romans 10:17 King James Bible. You said: "Jesus didn't speak in KJV english. He didn't even speak in English at all which is probably news to you." Response: That is irrelevant and silly at the same time. Jesus poke in Hebrew, was recorded in Greek and the word of God was translated into English. Think about this... *NOTHING* was lost! The King James Bible is the pure translation of the Hebrew (Masoretic Text) and the Greek (Textus Receptus) Your anger makes you attack instead of having a civil discussion.
By God's grace my precious dad gave me the KJV long time ago... Love to hear about the KJV! Thank you brother for you're wisdom in all this. May God bless you and your family in Jesus Mighty name abundantly 🙏👨👩👦😇❤️
"FOR THE WORD OF GOD IS QUICK, AND POWERFUL, AND SHARPER THAN ANY TWOEDGED SWORD, PIERCING EVEN TO THE DIVIDING ASUNDER OF SOUL AND SPIRIT, AND OF THE JOINTS AND MARROW, AND IS A DESCERNER OF THE THOUGHTS AND INTENTS OF THE HEART." Hebrews 4:12 Awesome, we purchased enough of the "King James Bible" Companions for every BIBLE in the house - almost! The ones that I use regularly anyway. That little booklet is such a huge help to me! Thank you so much, Brother David. An awesome work you our doing for our LORD JESUS CHRIST!
God help you if you don't speak English and understand old English to boot. Looks like hell is your final resting place if you don't have the inspired KJV. All those poor Chinese, or Indian people. Hope they all learn old English in time to be saved.
@@Netgazum It's in ENGLISH not Chinese and it's the inspired Word IN ENGLISH so your comment is pointless. God's Word can be in any language,as long it doesn't distort the original Hebrew and Greek meaning and intent and make it say something completely different. And English is the main spoken language throughout the world.
@@spirit-walkerwaters4521 According to the King James in Deuteronomy 32:8 some how the nations of the world were split up according to the number of the sons of Israel,. That was before there was an Israel so how could they be split according to their number? Seems like a bad translation and it is, good thing we had the older dead sea scrolls to reference and correct the corruption with the right translation, Sons of God. Certainly the King Jamess is not inspired why would you make such a claim? It's an ok translation.
@@Netgazum That's completely false. Genesis 35:10 shows the truth “And God said unto him, Thy name is Jacob: thy name shall not be called any more Jacob, but Israel shall be thy name: and he called his name Israel.” The Dead Sea Scrolls are filled with lies and that's because they were forged, and at a later date than the ORIGINAL OLD TESTIMENT HEBREW BIBLE
@@spirit-walkerwaters4521 That is factually incorrect. Sorry but the dead sea scrolls are much older than the Hebrew masoritic texts used for the King James and no one disputes that do your research.You are not arguing any sense and as it's written in the KJV those verses make no sense. So now that the truth has been established do not lie anymore about the source material for the KJV, if you do you are just a lier.
I have KJV and KJVer , only ones i'll use. Now , I am currently in a Bible study, and I have been persecuted slightly for reading from the KJV. I understand that most of the students do not speak english as their first language. So I told them that I would read the NIV only for the class and in my personal studies I will read KJV. English is not their first language so, I was trying to be understanding when I was chosen to read a Verse out loud. I asked God in prayer to help me understand the KJV , because I had learned about how the different translations remove Verses and Jesus' Words, I no longer wanted to read from any other Bible but the KJV. The KJV is so beautiful! and when I read from it , I feel like I am reading from the heart.
Well said! I love the KJV! Some people say it's hard to understand, to those people I say: i grew up in another country and English is my second language, if I can understand it then so can you! Besides, do a verse by verse comparison with another translation and you will find that the meaning of words have been diminished or changed, it's scary!
I have been willfully reading the King James Bible since I was 12. I find the language, poetry and tone of the King James text to be, by far and wide, superior not only to any modern Bibles, but basically all modern American English. Because of my fascination with the King’s English, when I was in 10th grade and we got into the Tragedy of Julias Caesar and Romeo & Juliet, I was even able to correct my English teacher’s pronunciation of the words and their meanings.
Well, the letters are in modern english without the f mean a s and so on.. Its quite understandable, and some of the words that I found that I didn't know were answered in the context.. some of them if you keep reading will answer it self.. and seriously.. you learn new words in school and people have no problem look it up.. Also we dont' rewrite hymns or shakespare.. so.. .we should have more enthusium to read the Bible and study from it... sometimes taking the time to slow down, learn is a good thing. God bless
Amen, brother. Actually, I have noticed in modern version circles, that Christians never open the Bible when they’re discussing it. They just talk about the general idea of a particular passage. I like to open the Bible and go to the scriptures that we are discussing to be sure that we have them right, and a major reason for this it’s because I believe in God‘s perfect preserved words, and not in a general dynamic equivalence of ideas.
Garbage. SInce 'modern version circles' is basically the entire church, you don't seem to know much about this topic. BTW Gods preserved words were in HEBREW and GREEK so unless you are a scholar in these languages, you are NOT reading 'preserved words' but rather a translation thereof.
Are the many other versions responsible for the condition of the Church today? Sure is strange to hear Pastors make us laugh yet fail to tell us about sin, repentance or the wrath of God.
rlunnerstall. I say partially. If you research where the modern translations come from you'll understand. What's worse is that almost every pastor in America is against the KJV. It's actually really sad and disheartening to hear from your own pastor(s) that the KJV has "mistakes" in it or that the verse in my Bible was put in by some random person who grab a hold of the manuscript (and yes this IS being taught today). For example, "Christian" schools are teaching that in 1 John 5:7 that the three heavenly witnesses the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit is a forgery when the early church fathers quote this exact verse which predate their manuscripts! The sad part of it is that the argument that they make is the same as the Jehovah witness' argument. Check out their founder's quote in his book: “The only text in Scripture which was ever claimed to prove, or affirm, that the Father, Son and Spirit are one, is a portion of 1 John 5:7, 8. This appears only in Manuscripts written since the fifth century, and is acknowledged by all Trinitarians to be a “forgery.” So undisputable is this, that the translators of the “Revised Version” recently published, omit the clause without note or comment, though those Revisors [sic] were themselves believers in Trinity.” Excerpt From: David W. Daniels. “Can You Trust Just One Bible?.” But, I know the truth, I know where my Bible comes and the ones who wrote it. I hold up the KJV/Valera 1602 Purificada high!
@@Obediah002 Wow. The MSG is not even a translation! it shouldn't be allowed to have such a title... I'll admit I picked up a copy from the Goodwill for a buck but it's only for curiosity's sake. It's not a translation but a paraphrase
We would be doing good in our searching of Him out in His word by looking back to the language the KJV was translated from not looking for an easier read or comparing multiple versions to see what you can glean rom them all, which is really kinda nonsensical.
Too bad we have to specify which version of the Bible these days, whereas in the past little children would sing simply: "The B-I-B-L-E, yes that's the book for me! I stand alone on the Word of God, the B-I-B-L-E!" You are right on, brother. Thanks so very much. From now on, it's the KJV for me!
Unless you are Catholic, in which case you have a non-KJV Bible that is several books longer thsn the KJV. Or an Eastern Orthodox Christian, in which case you have another non-KJV Bible that is several books longer than even the Catholic one.
@@Dreamerwild Or unless you are a JW, in which case you also have a corrupt perversion of man's word, not God's word! Just saying! I used to be JW! Thank God, I know the truth now, and I'm out for GOOD!
Thank you for this, I use the exact 'defense', I guess I would say, in defending my Bible usage of the King James and it's amazing the attacks that I get. God bless you and keep imparting your God inspired wisdom. God bless you brother.
God help you if you don't speak English and understand old English to boot. Looks like hell is your final resting place if you don't have the inspired KJV. All those poor Chinese, or Indian people. Hope they all learn old English in time to be saved.
KJV could express urgency, conviction, damnation like no other modern versions. If this is where I knew my life is done for, then I'm gonna stick with it. I choose not to err and lower the meanings of each words.
@@tdickensheets No one is forcing anyone to read the King James Bible.... We are just pointing out the errors of your modern versions.... Your hypocrisy is noted...
Yes, though I don't want to reocmmend someone read a Bible with condtrictions and corrupted doctrine. Yes, can get someone salvation but its a trjoan horse.@@tdickensheets
This is what happens when the Bible is worshipped and put on the same level of God. Yes it’s gods word, but it’s more fluid than people realize, it’s not contained by specific words and translations, it’s here in our hearts and in our vocal traditions
Bible before 1611 KJV 1) Tyndale in 1526 2) Coverdale in 1535 3) Matthews Bible in 1537 4) Taverners Bible in 1539 5) Great Bible in 1540 6) Geneva Bible in 1560 7) Bishops Bible in 1568
@@DJFAmenHeavy How am I wrong? Have you ever looked into the history of the King James Bible? And to say that Bible alone and none else is wrong on many levels.
Proverbs 18:1 KJV, “Through desire a man, having separated himself, seeketh “ {and} intermeddleth with all wisdom.” Proverbs 18:1 NKJV, “A man who isolates himself seeks his own desire; “He rages against all wise judgment.” Proverbs 18:1 NASB, “He who separates himself seeks {his own} desire, “He quarrels against all sound wisdom.” Proverbs 18:1 ESV, “Whoever isolates himself seeks his own desire; “he breaks out against all sound judgment.” Proverbs 18:1 DR, “He that hath a mind to depart from a friend seeketh occasions: he shall ever be subject to reproach.” Proverbs 18:1 NIV “An unfriendly person pursues selfish ends “and against all sound judgment starts quarrels.”
One question you need to ask is what did the word "intermeddeleth" mean and do we still use it today? for if we don't use the word anymore, then the meaning of that word might be lost to some (or most) people. Another is what does the hebrew say, for even if you don't respect the Hebrew, it still can explain why other bibles say what they say on account of some (or most) of them are at the very least trying to follow the Hebrew here.
If the kjv sounds beautiful to you, it's because the translators made it that way on purpose. Sometimes this resulted in archaic or more latinate words cause those sounded nice back then. It seems no English bible before the kjv had "intermeddeleth" there in proverbs 18 : 1, so you could have an issue with all of these too if you wanted : Wycliffe(i) 1 He that wole go a wei fro a frend, sekith occasiouns; in al tyme he schal be dispisable. Coverdale(i) 1 Who so hath pleasure to sowe discorde, piketh a quarell in euery thinge. MSTC(i) 1 He accompanieth himself with all steadfast and healthsome doctrine, that hath a desire to it and is sequestered from company. Matthew(i) 1 Who so hath pleasure to sow dyscorde, pyketh a quarel in euery thyng. Great(i) 1 He accompanieth hym selfe with all steadfast & helth some doctryne, that hath a feruent desyre to it and is sequestrate from companye. Geneva(i) 1 For the desire thereof hee will separate himselfe to seeke it, and occupie himselfe in all wisdome. Bishops(i) 1 Who so hath an earnest desire [to wysdome] he will sequester him selfe to seeke it, and occupie him selfe in all stedfastnesse & sounde doctrine
I understand how a young or a new Christian could read other versions. But I don't understand how a true born again believer could stay in these liberal watered down translations. God blessed me as a young man, letting me know that all I needed was the KJV. It was the word of God preserved perfectly for the English speaking nations. I did not have to waste precious time and effort sifting through the Westcott and Hort fabrications. What a blessing!
I know King James has a lot of errors but I trust in God, I tried other bibles and didn't feel comfortable with them so decided the King James and felt comfort in the way he has it written errors or not.
@@markgushue9482 Isaiah 65:25 25The wolf and the lamb shall feed together, and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock: and dust shall be the serpent's meat. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain, saith the LORD. King James Bible Isnt it supposed to be lion and lamb?
I grew up om the kjv and love it. However I am very well educated and have no problem reading it However the kjv is not readable for someone with a 8th or so reading ability or someone who is not a native speaker of English
You just mentioned what made me to search for Bible translations. It bothers me when I hear pastors say " a better reading will be...." There are so many that has read and have faith in that passage and suddenly a pastor comes and cast doubt in their minds
and what are they ACTUALLY doing? Giving you a BETTER rendering of the passage ie more accurately representing what God's Word says. How can that POSSIBLY be an issue?
I have read the KJV Bible since I was able to read. I trust no other Bible, but I did the research to know that it is the only Bible that has not been corrupted by man's ideas. People love to whine about the thee's and thou's of the Bible and yet they make it more accurate. Ye is plural, thou is singular! It isn't difficult and in itself these words help ensure the KJV's accuracy!
Uh, King James specifically requested that the Hampton Court Conference hsve the KJV conform to the eschatology and episcopal structure of the English Church, which charted it's own path away from the rest of Christendom when Henry the 8th couldn't get a divorce. Human intentions are zll over this thing.
I use the Authorised King James but I also have an interest in bringing people to Christ. I distribute scripture for Pocket Testament League in a deprived area with low educational attainment and an NIV or NLT would be better understood than the Authorised. If it brings people to Chist that is all that is important. I was brought to Christ by being given a Gideons New Testament and Psalms at 12. It converted me so that ministry blessed me.
This is so easily debunked. The KJV translators made decisions on how to translate certain words and phrases. Why did they translate Passover in every instance except Acts 12:4 where it's translated Easter??? The italicized words in the KJV are words that they added to help understand the verse better!!
God help you if you don't speak English and understand old English to boot. Looks like hell is your final resting place if you don't have the inspired KJV. All those poor Chinese, or Indian people. Hope they all learn old English in time to be saved.
Bible Translation Stuff "In contrast to the half-dozen mainly medieval manuscripts on which the King James Version was based, we now have over five thousand New Testament manuscripts, including some extremely close to the time the New Testament books were written (by the standard used for ancient texts). These manuscripts make the New Testament by far the best-documented work of the ancient world and also explain why more accurate translations are available today than in times past." Craig Keener
New International Version 1 Corinthians 9:27 I strike a blow to my body and make it my slave so that after I have preached to others, I myself will not be disqualified for the prize. King James Bible 1 Corinthians 9:27 But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway. Why would I read anything other then the King James Bible? The NIV seriously misinterprets the original and preserved word of God.
@@christshrt7686 another ignorant response. The NIV and other modern translations are the Word of God just as the KJV is, but it actually english as we speak it. Do not disgrace yourself with such disrespectful comments about God's Word. I doubt He is very impressed by it.
@@rosaliebent4833 I see that your comment is from 2 years ago.... I never avoid responding to people who do not believe the Bible. Post your comments and I will enjoy discussing the Bible with you!
Romans 5:20 Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound: Hebrews 2:15 And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.
The first two minutes of this are almost unbearable. The speaker tries to make the case that a critic of KJV is relying on his "own wisdom" over "god's wisdom," but couldn't that same platitude be applied to someone advocating for KJV only? After all, the speaker is advocating for KJV ONLY, which means that you are standing above all the "authorities" found elsewhere. At two minutes and thirty seconds he claims that KJV is "gods words," and thst it is a superior version to all the others, which AGAIN is an individual judgment being stacked against other Bibles that he is judging. Which is apparently wrong to do with KJV but not with any of the others. How does the speaker know that the KJV is "gods words," and thst the other translations are only "mixtures with man's words." He claims KJV has been tested, by whom? Where are the results of these tests documented? How does he measure the "prayerful, faithful people" produced by other Bibles against the KJV. How do we know his affirmation that "faithful and prayerful" people produced by the KJV are moreso than those produced by other Bibles? He tells an anecdote about protecting his finances. Would the NIV have not protected his finances as well? What about ESV? He doesn't compare those proverbs between versions of the Bible, he just lists KJV versions and calls them God's words without telling us how he knows that they are God's words. He claims that KJV "says things right," and that KJV doesn't self contract. Can he demonstrate that claim? Can he demonstrate his claim that other versions cause doubt and the KJV doesn't? He just makes assertions without providing evidence that his claims are true. How does he know what god wants? How does he know that the KJV is what god wants?
@@henrylaurel4476 : You are lying about him, he uses evidence to support the claim that the Received Text is copied from the originals and the Westcott and Hort Text is from corruptions.
@@henrylaurel1188 : The KJV Text is from the originals,kept pure by scribes throughout all these years, martyrs to preserve them, the Westcott and Hort Text is from a corrupted stream eventually out of the Vatican, of course you are free to read and study the corruptions, but what a waste of time.
@@golightly5121 There are several problems with the KJV. Those manuscripts you mentioned? They were not perfect or inspired. The Maseritic texts for the old testament were VERY late, dating to around the 10th century. The Textus Receptis for the new testament was written by a Dutch scholar who had incomplete greek manuscripts and had to back-translate a bunch from latin ones. Earlier manuscripts, closer to the originals, have been discovered since the KJV was written. The KJV was written before the Dead Sea Scrolls or the Codex Siniacus were discovered. These texts are archeological finds, and modern translations are largely based on them. They were burried in sand and preserved in pots! So your claims of a catholic conspiracy to alter the text and hide the intent of the originals makes no sense here.
I have explained the KJB in many ways over the past 35 years. Nearly every Christian says the same thing, "I don't see the difference." Why do they say this, well because most simply don't "mediate day and night" on the word. There is only a remnant that stays in the 'word' day and night (many times a day and at night). Those that do, for the most part, will find the differences between the KJB and other bibles.
@@terryford6783 Ignorance is your cult, simpleton. There were no other bibles around for 270 years after the KJB took hold except the corrupt Roman Catholic trash bible which all MV's use the same trash manuscripts that the RCC used for their trash bible.
I will NEVER let another sinful man tell me about my own salvation. I will read it for myself in God's word.... And in English, that is the King James...
If you read the original preface by the actual translators who never said it was not the perfect one, and they did not go against previous translations also.
Let's ignore the many additions to the New Testament (like 1 John 5:7-8) and just go into the fact that it is written in a dead language that nobody speaks and most people don't understand and leave it at that.
The Way if you can’t understand the KJV you really need to get an education. I’ve never had a problem understanding it other then maybe a couple obsolete words which are easy enough to look up.
The first Bible that I read is the Kings James Bible version it is accurate when it comes to the words it is clean and crisp the rest of the bottles of this translations the Kings Kings James Bible the original you know that the Kings James Bible is the best version out there
you mean like how it used the latin word 'lucifer' instead of the actual translation of the word which means LIGHT? or perhaps how it called Pentecost 'Easter' - a pagan festival. There are MANY errors in the KJV that modern translations correct.
AMEN! The authors have watered down the NIV, NASB, ESV, etc, to make it fit their belief system! But is it God's Holy Word? NOT AT ALL! IT'S MAN'S WORD, NOT GOD'S WORD
@@martinbaker7032 You have been lied to... Yes there was a Bible before the King James Bible. Your issue is that you are following the Westcott & Hort only cult.... They are just like their "daddy", he showed up in Genesis 3:1... He also said "...yea hath God said..." The King James Bible is not "just" a translation. It is the pure preserved word of God for English speaking people of today. Your Westcott & Hort only cult makes no sense.
@@martinbaker7032 You are a fool.... **Bible believers are not part of a cult** The King James Bible is against the devil... Your Westcott & Hort only cult is promoting modern English translations! They (modern translations) promote doctrines of devils! You should check yourself! You are working for your father the devil himself! He too said "Yeah hath God said?" (Genesis 3:1) You are also not very educated.... You missed part of what I said... But then your father the devil is a pro at taking things out of *CONTEXT* If you are promoting modern translations you are part of the Westcott & Hort only cult.
@@martinbaker7032 Bible believers are not in a cult... We believe God... God said: Psalm 12:6 The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Psalm 12:7 Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever. Matthew 24:35 Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away. I Peter 1:23 Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever. I Peter 1:24 For all flesh is as grass, and all the glory of man as the flower of grass. The grass withereth, and the flower thereof falleth away: I Peter 1:25 But the word of the Lord endureth for ever. And this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you. Sadly you Westcott & Hort only cultists do not believe God. You do not have a pure Bible... I do! You do not trust God. I do. You worship the intellect.... I don't. God is smarter than you...
When Tyndale later translated the Pentateuch (Genesis - Deuteronomy) from the Hebrew, he used the word "Passover" throughout, so why "Easter" in the New Testament? Probably because the Greek word for Passover, "Πάσχα" (Pascha) does not have an actual meaning in Greek. Instead, it is a transliteration from the Hebrew "פֶּסַח" "Pesach." In Hebrew, the word literally means "Passover," so in the Old Testament, Tyndale was translating the word's actual meaning. In the Greek, however, the word had no meaning and was simply the proper name of a Holiday. By that time, most Greeks used the word to refer to the now separate holiday known in English as "Easter." Thus, ignorant of the roots of the word at the time he was translating the New Testament, Tyndale used "Easter" to translate "Pascha." It is a quite understandable error!
Acts 12:4 in KJV is wrong, given that the Greek term is pascha, "passover". Does the Greek NT, for that matter, anywhere reference any 'pagan' so-called 'holyday' by name? I don't think so. If Luke by inspiration had wanted to reference "Easter" (from the goddess Astarte/Ashtoreth, etc. forms of spellings) I guess there would have been an unambiguous term for it readily available in the Greek tongue. facebook.com/KJVOnlyismRefuted/?ref=page_internal
You should watch the video and listen to what you said. I wanted KJV onlyism to be right. It's not. And just because it would be nice doesn't mean it's correct. Faithful would be looking at the whole picture and take the time to look. It's not as bad or confusing as it seems. You can get the same doctrine from the more acceptable versions. I prefer the KJV everytime. But it's not perfect. It's just the facts. I have no agenda for this. But I wonder if many Baptists aren't guilty of clinging to weaker portions of KJV to protect unbiblical doctrine through appeals to specific word translations that are more diverse in the context of the original culture and the nuance of meaning. . I.e. E.C.T HELL
Many people just dont put in the effort required to come to the correct conclusion. There is a lot! I started out reading paralel Bibles, and asking myself what the the differences actualy are. It didnt take long to come to the conclusion that we take God at His word, not translators...
King James Bible only for me ... the devil has done an excellent job diluting & twisting the Holy Bible thru PER-versions ... confusion & dissension are the result!
+Debra Gill -- "So sad" that OTHERS are "lacking discernment? Try AGAIN! You are there listening to a guy who professes Christ, bash another daily - who also professes Christ, and THAT is *poor discernment* as one of them is a man of God and one is a spoiled brat. People need to decide which is which, though God already has.. Christ would probably say both need to grow up..but you are there STILL ..EVERY day listening to Eddie bash Bryan.. NO discernment in that. Proper discernment is what Apostle Paul said to do when he said: "from such, turn away" - as I did. You need discernment yourself..you largely lack it, and yes, it IS sad! You STILL comment that you '"agree" with Eddie...EVERY day.. *Total lack of any discernment* - You..Eddie..all of them...the Bible says GOSSIP is abomination in Romans 1 and that's ALL Eddie is doing making 943839248293 videos about Bryan.. ONE day, Jesus will tell him.. THAT is what it is going to take.. for you too? OR will you learn discernment while there is still time?? Jesus is *coming soon!*
I don’t have a KJV. I have a NKJV and a Cepher. I read the Bible daily but I have trouble memorizing to the extent that I would like to. I am going to invest in a KJV and see if it makes a difference.
denleemel yet you post no proof, because you have none. Just like the countless other comments out there of people running their mouth saying God’s word has errors, but never can seem to post any proof. Here’s some proof that it has NO errors. www.kjvtoday.com/home/reliable-hebrew-text www.av1611.org/kjv/fight.html#fight15
Hey can anybody help me out there, there are some verses in the old testament that mean exactly opposite in anything other than the king James Bible, I had him pinned down in my old Bible app but it changed. I’m hoping you guys can help me remember some of them. Because I’ve completely forgotten them.❤
Hello everyone and shalom 🕊 I got an email from chick tracts from where I order most of my tracts from and Brother David's book on King James was being promoted. I love love love my King James Bible! I believe that it's the authoratative word of God and is anointed. Mathew 28:19 which reads Go ye therefore, and teach(1)all nations (and) the side note says- (make disciples of). I read in the email sent to me in one of the 51 ways which said this very passage interpretation. Its in my King James bible! Now do I not continue reading the side notes of interpretations or not? I mean should I not trust the (dare I say) scripture references? I fell like saying.. what gives Sam!? 😊 Im a little muddled... I will be praying about this probably right after or soon after posting my comment. God bless all 🙏🏽 Shalom and come Lord Jesus!!!
Absolute truth has mistakes - According to who, and compared to what, other "bibles" full of mistakes and your opinion aka relative truths?! The original... - Give me a perfect copy, oh it only exists in heaven according to relative truth. Well, the Holy Spirit.... - oh the same Holy Spirit you know about from relative truths. I mean logically... - logically you can't even prove without absolute truth that there is anything real outside your mind. Keep arguing Bible correcting relativist God wannabes. "Now the scholar was more subtil than any educator of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the believer, Yea, hath God said that really, here's what He meant" ... I'm sure this is the best translation for scholars and popes.
Hey bro...the other versions were written by men who didn't even believe sound biblical doctrine. Read a brief history below: followingjesuschrist3.com/2015/10/24/the-bible-version-controversy-a-brief-history/
King James Only-ism is a cult. If you prefer KJV, that's fine. It's a great translation. I read it quite often. But to say, "you're only going to be saved by reading the KJV," or, "all modern translations are from the devil," is a sign that you have no idea how we got the KJV in the first place.
Daric other "bibles" have mistakes, the KJV has none. Which book is better than the KJV? If you can think of one, why do you still use the KJV? If you can't think of one, why do you use any other bible?
Sean Lawler You seriously don't understand the history of the bible's transmission and translation process if you can seriously say to someone that the KJV has no problems with it and mean it. It shows complete ignorance of how it came about, as if angels came down from heaven with the KJV bible already translated into English. Go read White's "King James Only Controversy". You'll be much more informed and won't make such an ass of yourself when you talk.
www.chick.com/catalog/books/1271.asp Daric, Click this link an get this book. It will show you what is missing from non KJV Bibles. I can buy you the book if you'd like. :-)
@Power Lister -- Call it a cult. We'll see what God has to say about it one day, since you clearly choose man's words over God's. I'll stay in "CULT" and believe GOD. You are welcome to believe MEN - which is AGAINST the word of God.. but you're blind, and saved believers are not blind.
If that is the case then I suspect that you believe that when God divided up the nations he did so according to the number of the children of Israel. Which would be silly of course since they were not around at the time of the tower of babel when God divided up the nations of the earth. Hmm, I wonder what other issues exist in the KJV?
Am I missing something here? I got an email from chick tracts saying that the word "teach" in the King James version should not be make disciples of all nations where in fact that is what it means in the commentaries that I discovered. Is Chick tracts wrong on this matter? I order mostly from chick tracts to hand out as I share the good news, my testimony etc. Any thoughts?
@@jimd9339God had his Word established over a millenia before the KJV saw the light of day. The Church was also in existence over 1,500 years before there was the KJV. Do you reduce God to being contained within the pages of that one version of Scripture? Sure sounds that way. Do the modern versions truly weaken any doctrine of the Christian faith? I will grant you, that I prefer the Formal Equivalent translations, but God can draw people to Himself, using even a poorer paraphrase, if it speaks to their heart and soul . I ask again, do you limit God?
Right now you are making the KJV the standard... why not make the Greek and Hebrew manuscripts the standard. You realize the TR does not read like any known manuscript. Erasmus (the man who put together the TR which the KJV was translated from) was a Roman Catholic priest who dedicated the TR to Pope Leo X and couldn't even get the copy right the first time. Let alone his statement regarding I John 5:7... he was fighting against the Latin Vulgate which was uses for 1100 years... just because the KJV has been used for 400 years doesn't define superiority. After dealing with Erasmus' known errors you have to deal with Beza's Conjectural Emendations. I use the KJV, but I have to, as a Bible believer, discern the Word for myself through the Spirit. You use so much circular reasoning in this video is frightening. What's even more frightening is that people are following that faulty logic. Please hold the KJV to the same are just. Using preference instead of logic is faulty as well. You are comparing other versions to the KJV, you could use that argument for any version out there. If I used the NASB primarily and compared all versions to that the NASB would be the standard and the KJV would fall short. There are places in the KJV where some words are not translated as accurate as they could be, they don't have bad translations, but it could make things clearer. (Doctrine of hell, etc.) This is just a small fraction of a percentage of the arguments against your faulty logic. I'm not into RUclips debates so I won't respond but I just encourage every man to grow is wisdom and grace like Christ did. Study things out for yourself. Look into textual studies. Don't just listen to faulty logic. If you prefer the KJV, then great! It's a great translation. But to say it's the only, or best, translation you would have to have yourself compared all other versions in a fair and balanced review.
I am a King James Only person. I have a problem with something I read today, which made me pretty upset. I decided that to help me memorize more of Philippians is to write it down word for word. I came to where Paul said bowels and mercies and in my KJ there was a footnote “affection”. Can you explain the use of this word, which to me in modern English, is offensive?The New KJ corrects this.
I’ve read the King James Bible since I was a teenager. All of the other Bibles around then have gone. Only the King James remains. I suspect that the same will happen to the modern Bibles available today.
I think its a Holman KJV compact. But this specific model is no longer in print, but you still can find a Holman Large Print Compact at Amazon with prices ranging from $10 bucks for Bonded Leather to $30 bucks for genuine cowhide leather. It's not the SAME but is pretty close.
I would like to say I have tried reading the NASB but it just seems like another best selling novel, I do not get the same intense spiritual coaching as I do with the KJV.
The NIV, NAS, ESV and other translations are all God's Word the same as the KJV. It is a good thing to have different translations to better understand the Bible
Kevin Jodrey it’s not all of Gods word or even Gods word if it leaves out scripture or changes the meaning of words which isn’t what God said or what he meant. I’ve been comparing versions when I read and see fairly big discrepancies in the NIV and ESV to the point I can’t trust either translation.
Henry Laurel God doesn’t say that. But a thorough study with an open mind will lead you to the conclusion that the critical text has been messed with and that the KJV did Not add verses and additional words.
Henry Laurel I never stated I’m an Onlyest. And even if I was it’s not a cult so don’t make claims you can’t verify. Stating what you did is called lying so obviously you have no problem doing what you accuse others of which also makes you a hypocrite. It’s also a lie that scribes added all of this words. I’ve done my research so if you want to keep making false accusations I’ll let you take that up with the one who will hold you accountable. It’s unbelievable that the liberal Christians of this day have swallowed hook line and sinker the deception of the devil.
Sounds like a very good explanation to me. One example of a major disappointment I've had before was with the Classical Amplified translation. Thought I had a translation brought to my attention that gave accurate elaborations but later on come to find out they are basically just opinions or theoretics, educated guesses for lack of a better way to put it, those "guesses" as I put it can still hold substance maybe? But still were based on opinion. Should seem so simple, I just am looking for accurate elaborations on certain verses that I believe could use more explanation in the English language. Still am going to be cautious against some KJV-only'ers due to the fact that not all KJV-only'ers are not all necessarily going to have the same doctrine or beliefs despite believing in the same translation, get the impression that a lot (not all) KJV-only'ers can have very inhibiting/ignorant religious mindsets. Nonetheless find this to be an excellent explanation as to why to stick with only the KJV for the English language.
Your videos are beyond incredible, I have had the look what missing books and have given them out, now I need the same KJV, insert , and the other dictionary , you talked about
I've also noticed that the most anointed preachers use the KJV in their personal quiet time with the Lord. I think that says a lot about the KJV. When anointed men of God meditate on His Word, their preferred Bible for themselves is the KJV. This is true for Kenneth Hagin, Benny Hinn, TD Jakes, and Joseph Prince. They often preach using NKJV and sometimes in other versions, but when they talk about personal stories on when they're reading the Bible in they're own time, the Bible they use is the KJV. They don't say it explicitly, I just noticed it because I've listened on a lot of their teachings, and read a lot of their books. For example is Kenneth Hagin's story on how he got healed when he was very young. He got so sick that his blood was yellowish, and he felt he was very close to dying. But he read Mark 11:23, decided to believe it and declare it. He declared it with a vengeance again and again and suddenly he felt something trickle from his head to his body, like honey. From that moment on, he was completely healed. I've read this story on one of his books, and I noticed that the Mark 11:23 he was reading and declaring was the KJV. Joseph Prince told a story in a preaching of when he was doing his quiet time, studying His Word. He was asking the Lord about a particular verse that seemed to contradict other verses. Eventually, after reading the verse again and again, the Lord spoke to him and gave him a revelation. When he told this story, he specifically quoted from the KJV because that's what he was reading in his quiet time. I noticed it because he shifted from NKJV. He normally uses the NKJV when preaching. TD Jakes and Benny Hinn normally use the KJV in their preachings and books. TD Jakes sometimes makes his audience laugh when reading the KJV because he says "ass" which is old word for donkey.
There is no way that the King James Bible will cease to be in use! There will always be an intensely loyal following who will prefer it! On the other hand, there are other versions which with variations are every bit as good. I am a Christian who has more than a superficial knowledge of these things; I personally prefer the New English, and the Revised Standard Version, with the Apocrypha which some Christians like, and many scorn.
Question: How do you know which is which? Answer: Holy Ghost/Holy Spirit I prefer the KJV due to Tyndale's influence. I'm not kjv only in any strict sense.
@@anonymousperson6462 They did not use the Latin Vulgate because it is a Catholic manuscript. The King James Bible translators used a different Latin... It was in the right line of Manuscripts.
My friend. Your argument is so convoluted it makes no sense. For instance. The NASB is said to be the best (not perfect) translation we have in English to date. Not because I say so, but because the body of scholars who work with the manuscripts have said so. By the way, it's the Adventists through the work of Benjamin G Wilkinson (Our Authorized Bible Vindicated 1930) that brought in the modern KJV Only trend when JJ Ray and David Otis Fuller copied him and published their work in 55 and 75.
The KJVO while not a disease is definitely a disorder, no doubt about it. A translation has to be judged by it's accuracy to the text it is translating. We should be extremely familiar with the underlying texts of our translation, in this case the TR, and make it our yardstick that all translations are measured by instead of measuring all translations by the KJV.
"Further Thoughts on the Word of God" - __chapt. 4 Understanding Inspiration ...A man who waits for manuscript evidence to establish his confidence in the King James Bible is like a man who wants a DNA sample before he can trust the blood of Christ. ---John M. Asquith
I need some help folks. First, I love the Chicks Tracts ministry ever since I was a child. I have learned much scripturally from you in my life. I personally grew up with the King James and thus, I love it. That being said. Is there no modern translation into contemporary language that meets muster? Common sense would suggest that there is? Second: Biblical translations other than English? Explain the King James Bible version in languages other than English.
@vdaugg ---- You ask: "Is there no modern translation into contemporary language that meets muster?" Common sense would suggest that there is? Well, common sense is WRONG here. How is it common sense to read God's words MIXED with man's words? David just clearly explained that. NOT ONE other Bible than the King James is God's words ONLY... NOT ONE.. People have NO idea of how great a deception those "versions" truly are. I know nothing about foreign languages, but the KJB in ANY language is God's OWN words and NONE of man's word included. If you want to trust MAN, feel free - but it is your soul at stake. As I said and David agrees, EVERY Bible version contains MAN's words and thus IS a deception. Both Proverbs AND the Apostle Peter repeating the verse in Acts is clear: "We ought to obey God and NOT men." I pray this "wakes you up" to the deception you seem to have fallen under.
you ran into the crazies of KJVonlyism which is a cult of conspiracy theorists. The Word of God is unchangeable but the language(s) that people use IS and does, change. Modern translations so little more than retranslate the original into the language of the day. But cultists like KJVonlyists cannot cope with that because they worship the translation, not the God of the translation.
@@rosaliebent4833 You are so off your rocker... The devil has you in his grips... Let me help... **YOU NEED REAL HELP** You ran into the crazies of Westcott & Hort onlyism which is a cult of conspiracy theorists. The Word of God is unchangeable and when the word of God is copied *OR* translated into different languages the language(s) that people use IS and does change *BUT* God's promises to keep His words preserved and pure throughout *EVERY GENERATION* will *NEVER* fail nor will those promises ever change. You said: "Modern translations so little more than retranslate the original into the language of the day." Response: You are so indoctrinated into the devil's cult that you believe that God is a liar and is impotent. It is really sad that you have such a puny lying god. My God is *OMNIPOTENT* and is able to keep His words pure in any language and He has for us English speaking people in the King James Bible. The translators of your weak and perverted modern bibles have an agenda hence the reason for their major changes. God warned His people, the Jews as well as the Christians 3 times in the Bible not to change the Bible, His word, by addition or subtraction. You are so full of the devil that you are stuck labeling Bible believers as "conspiracy theorists" (as if that gives credence to your silly conspiracy theory) and "cult members" as if that helps your weak position of rejecting the word of God. You said: But cultists like KJVonlyists cannot cope with that because they worship the translation, not the God of the translation." Response: You are so full of the devil that it is doubtful that you even have ever read or studied the King James Bible and here you sit, as a Pharisee, judging Bible believers saying that us *BIBLE BELIEVERS* are in a cult. We do praise the word of God because praising the word of God (a form of worship) is Biblical. It is also a way of worshiping the God of the Bible. Psalm 56:4 *In God I will praise his word* in God I have put my trust; I will not fear what flesh can do unto me. Psalm 56:10 **In God will I praise his word: in the LORD will I praise his word** Psalm 56:11 In God have I put my trust: I will not be afraid what man can do unto me. You do not know God or you would not call God a liar. Ye are of your father the devil... That fool showed up in the Bible in Genesis 3:1 questioning God's word! You are just like him!!!! You should get out of the cult that you are in, *REPENT* of your sin and trust the Lord Jesus Christ as your Saviour! Then you too could understand the Bible. I Corinthians 2:14 is in effect *UNTIL* you get saved.... I pray that you will repent and believe the Gospel.
Webster's 1828 dictionary, A crudens or strong's concordance. Scripture interprets scripture.. remember. So if something isn't clear in one place is more clear in another. Always pray first in humility, for wisdom & guidance. It isn't just a textbook. It is his Holy Word. Spiritual things are Spiritually discerned.
I'd like to add that in fact my King James bibles side notes says in Matthew 28 vs 19 "teach"1* (make disciples of). If we should stick with King James only which I love btw are we not supposed to follow the references (of) our King James bibles? This don't make no sense tat all !! 😜😝 Love to hear a response from Chick Tracts 🤔hmm perhaps I should email them...
Prov.21:1, The king's heart is in the hand of the LORD, as the rivers of water: He turneth it whithersoever He will. Prov.22:21, That I might make thee know the certainty of the words of truth; that thou mightest answer the words of truth to them that send unto thee...I am so thankful that the LORD preserved His words, though all the enemies of the truth rage on, and the KJV is certain proof of that. The history of the English Bible (textus receptus) is marvelous in our eyes!
@@martinbaker7032 You can find out about the history of the English bible on youtube now. It's called The Indestructible Book, by Ken Connolly... over 3hrs. and very exciting info
@@martinbaker7032 You are correct though, as many quote parts of verses out of context, and very few know Hebrew and Greek grammar and bible definitions of words. If you have a thirst for truth 'as it is in Jesus', there are a couple places you can learn from: IAmKoine and Grace and Truth, both on youtube. I also recommend The Complete Word Study New Testament, edited by Spiros Zodhiates, and dictionary. There is also the ones for the OT... I use the KJV version for reasons of believing the TR to be least 'corrupted' for lack of a better word. Hope you too receive 'the love of the truth'!
@@martinbaker7032 I am not KJV only, yet I do prefer TR versions of the text. Knowing the history of the English bible may give you more insight, as I've researched this most of my life through hundreds of sources. Yet, every man must 'be persuaded in his own mind' ( to borrow a phrase from Paul ). The Indestructible Book may still be in print (Baker Books). If not you might find a copy on the internet... maybe Abe Books or Google. An example of accuracy is Jn.3:7, 'Marvel not that I said unto thee (singular pronoun), Ye (plural pronoun) must be born again'... meaning Jesus was speaking to one person, telling him that all must be born 'of the Spirit'.
What I know for sure about you if you are a KJV Bible believer? I know you are trinitarian => 1 John 5:7,8 I know you believe that was God himself Who manifested in the flesh to save us => 1 Tim 3:16 I know you believe that someone can only be baptized if they believe in Jesus Christ, the Son of God, with all their heart => Acts 8:37 I know that you believe in the Eternal Condemnation of Hell => MANY SCRIPTURES THAT WERE REMOVED/CHANGED FROM MODERN BIBLE PERVERSIONS. Brother David, if possible, do a video about this subject: 'What I Know for sure about KJV Bible Believers?' This is an enormous advantage that few people think about, after all, all cults and false religions believe in the 'bible', but not in the Bible! What result in confusion; they do not even agree about the BASIC aspects of the Christian faith, for everyone only believe in a bible that does not exist in the real world.
What you say is utter garbage>modern translations do not ary one iota from the KJV on all doctrine, small or large. Why are you people so ignorant and uninformed
@@martinbaker7032 YOu make an interesting point that KJV-onlyists seem to worship the Bible rather than God. Meanwhile, God's Living Word, translated into hundreds of languages and versions thereof continue to bless and multiply the Church thus negating their silly idea that they are 'satanic'. Personally, I think KJVonlyists are morons.
2Tim 2:15 in the NIV builds self-righteous works, While The KJV builds faith and a Relationship with Jesus. NIV 2Tim 2:15. {{{{{ Do your best }}}}} to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth. KJV 2Tim 2:15. {{{{{{ Study }}}}}} to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. I'll Stick to the KJV...
I've been loyal to NKJV my whole Christian life because that's what my church uses. But you've convinced me to get a KJV instead. I completely agree that the notes in NKJV causes confusion. I've also always felt more inspiration (the rhema kind) in the KJV. It's just I've let the "thee", "thou", "ye" in KJV intimidate me before. But the true God-breathed, quickened Word is more important than my intimidation. It is completely possible to train your mind to read in old world English, and I will do that. After all, I have the Spirit of God in me to open my understanding even with all the old English words. I have a question though, what do you think of the Updated King James Version or UKJV? Someone made a translation of the KJV and only changed the thee, thou, ye, thine stuff. He made it available online without a copyright so everyone can use (unlike NIV, ESV, NKJV and others who copyrights and charges a fee for their version of the word of God). Just google UKJV to see his website and the complete UKJV text. That's the website that actually directed me to your channel.
you will find very little difference but it DOES use actual modern pronouns making it a lot easier to read. The KJV WAS a good translation in its time but english has moved on and the KJV now has words no one understands or worse... have changed in meaning. 1 COr 13... what does 'charity' mean?
By this logic would reading scriptures in their original languages be best? I speak Latin (thank you college classics requirements) so the Vulgate bible is open to me, but if I recall correctly much of the New Testament was written in Koine Greek, and the Old Testament was of course written in ancient Hebrew. You make a good argument that the KJV is a trustworthy translation -- and if its translation was divinely inspired then there really isn't an issue -- but could a shadow of doubt about *any* translation be removed by reading the bible as it was originally recorded? I've heard that some idioms and literary devices don't translate well from one language to the next.
People need be told about the 1611KJV and be encouraged to read the opochryphal books.Did you know that without the book of Maccabees,you will not understand John:10:21 about the day of dedication/Hannukah?
Why why why do people try to claim idolatry at people staying true to GODS WORD. This is just proof of the conditioning of our society, why has the church fallen so far away from God AT THE MOMENT that we all started to fall from the King James, unless the versions that we are using are not God's word?
I'm not being a jerk. I am sincere. Aren't you making the argument that: 1) God created the KJV Bible. 2) Therefore the KJV Bible is right because it was created by God. Isn't it fair to say that there is no such thing as a perfect English translation of the Bible? Even translating something like a fairy tale or simple story can cause issues. Are you going to be extremely literal or accurate to the intent? Sometimes these might be the same, but it seems to me like they are not always. Let me know what you think.
The issue is with the manuscripts from which EVERY modern translation comes from. They used the corrupted Westcott & Hort Greek. The King James Bible translators used the Masoretic Text for the OT and the Received Texts for the NT. The King James Bible comes from the pure preserved line of Manuscripts... Modern translations don't.
I have a number of questions: a) who doesn't want us to use the KJV? I know the devil is behind it all, but who's the human face behind the movement on earth? b) why? I get Satan's motive, but what's the excuse (and argument) that the earthly guys use to justify their position. c) how/why can we be sure that the KJV is true while other versions are not?
a) people who care about Gods Word being in peoples ACTUAL language b) The Devil probably is happen about the KJVO argument coz the word of God gets less understandable. c) Listen to actual experts. They are around and NONE are KJVO
@@rosaliebent4833 I don't think "experts" are the ones to listen to. They are always great at leading you exactly nowhere. What the Bible says is: 1 John 2:27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him. You think maybe the Bibleay be right?
Yes the authority to condemn all that don't read the only word of God. God help you if you don't speak English and understand old English to boot. Looks like hell is your final resting place if you don't have the inspired KJV. All those poor Chinese, or Indian people. Hope they all learn old English in time to be saved.
@@Netgazum Well that's just plain silly. Of course the Bible should be translated into every possible language. We simply believe the most authoritative and honest sources should be used for the basis of those translations. Of course those sources would be the Greek and Hebrew manuscripts that were used for the King James Authorized Version and it's predecessors. We reject the lessor manuscripts of highly suspect origin promulgated by the Roman Church that popped out of nowhere in the mid 1800s and seized upon by the German Rationalists and of late foisted upon the ignorant in the form of the new age 'bibles'.
![Yeat & Summrs - GO2WORK [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/NEFEwfPcXRA/mqdefault.jpg)
People Died For That Book. Changed My Life. Especially the Red Words of JESUS
John Connors 111 amen!
@Van Guard Not at all! But some people just like the Red-letter edition! It doesn't make any difference, Red-letter or not! Hope this helps!
@Ван Гвардия good grief Batman.... You are truly missing the point..
Don't force people read KJV only!!
@@martinbaker7032 ignorance. And people absolutely did die for the KJV.
God showed me about the KJV. I had no idea about "KJO" stuff.
My brother had just died, but had given me a KJV bible shortly before his death. I picked it up only because I needed the concordance. Then I found myself comparing that bible with the NASB I'd used for 18 years, along with my newer NIV. I was shocked to discover the differences, which only God could've shown me. It was then I began learning about versions, but my trust in God's word has never faltered. I know what he showed me.
kjv is the pure word of God✝️
Through the years, I keep coming back to David Daniels and his solid theological support for the Bible.
Having read KJV all my life, when I started to read different versions to compare them, I was "that's not what the bible says". It threw me off and I couldn't continue because it was too confusing.
Same here. I don't agree with the modern versions, they lower the meanings and the next thing you know, they'll have the not so serious context, nothing to worry about. It's causing them to err rather than be prepared to the Spiritual Warfare.
Don't force people read KJV only!!
you did no such thing. The KJV and other translations do NOT say different things unless of course you are too dumb to be able to read the same thing in different translations and understand it. Jesus didn't speak in KJV english. He didn't even speak in English at all which is probably news to you.
@@tdickensheets No one is forcing anyone to read the word of God. Pointing out the errors that are numerous in modern translations is safe and needed.
@@rosaliebent4833 You are using weak arguments while you try to defend the modern translations.
Let me help... You need help...
You said: "you did no such thing."
Response: This is where you started, so this is where I will start.
1. How do you know?
2. Can you prove that he "did no such thing."? No. You can't.
Now, can I prove that the modern translations do say totally different things? Yes.
Acts 8:37 in the modern English translations: ....... Omitted **In the modern translations they actually go from Acts 8:38 to Acts 8:38 The modern translators can't even count!**
Acts 8:37 And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.
**If you would like to know *WHY* the "Church of Christ" (cult) translator wanted that verse taken out of the text I am willing to show you why.**
I John 5:7 in the modern English translations:
1Jn 5:7 And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is the truth. (Revised version)
1Jn 5:7 There are three witnesses: (Good News Bible)
1Jn 5:7 And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is the truth. (American Standard version)
1Jn 5:7 For there are three that testify: (New American Standard version)
I John 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
*The King James Bible* (God's pure preserved word: in English for English speaking people) You will notice in the modern versions we see that 2 *MAJOR* Bible doctrines are changed, attacked, weakened and removed:
A. The Trinity.
B. The Deity of Jesus Christ.
I can give you numerous translation errors that are found in modern translations. The modern versions weaken *MAJOR* Bible doctrines.
You said: "The KJV and other translations do NOT say different things unless of course you are too dumb to be able to read the same thing in different translations and understand it."
Response: That is an emotional response. Those kinds of responses are due to weak faith. The word of God will strengthen your faith in God & God's word. Romans 10:17 King James Bible.
You said: "Jesus didn't speak in KJV english. He didn't even speak in English at all which is probably news to you."
Response: That is irrelevant and silly at the same time. Jesus poke in Hebrew, was recorded in Greek and the word of God was translated into English. Think about this... *NOTHING* was lost! The King James Bible is the pure translation of the Hebrew (Masoretic Text) and the Greek (Textus Receptus)
Your anger makes you attack instead of having a civil discussion.
By God's grace my precious dad gave me the KJV long time ago... Love to hear about the KJV! Thank you brother for you're wisdom in all this. May God bless you and your family in Jesus Mighty name abundantly 🙏👨👩👦😇❤️
"FOR THE WORD OF GOD IS QUICK, AND POWERFUL, AND SHARPER THAN ANY TWOEDGED SWORD, PIERCING EVEN TO THE DIVIDING ASUNDER OF SOUL AND SPIRIT, AND OF THE JOINTS AND MARROW, AND IS A DESCERNER OF THE THOUGHTS AND INTENTS OF THE HEART." Hebrews 4:12
Awesome, we purchased enough of the "King James Bible" Companions for every BIBLE in the house - almost! The ones that I use regularly anyway. That little booklet is such a huge help to me! Thank you so much, Brother David. An awesome work you our doing for our LORD JESUS CHRIST!
God help you if you don't speak English and understand old English to boot. Looks like hell is your final resting place if you don't have the inspired KJV. All those poor Chinese, or Indian people. Hope they all learn old English in time to be saved.
@@Netgazum It's in ENGLISH not Chinese and it's the inspired Word IN ENGLISH so your comment is pointless.
God's Word can be in any language,as long it doesn't distort the original Hebrew and Greek meaning and intent and make it say something completely different.
And English is the main spoken language throughout the world.
@@spirit-walkerwaters4521 According to the King James in Deuteronomy 32:8 some how the nations of the world were split up according to the number of the sons of Israel,. That was before there was an Israel so how could they be split according to their number? Seems like a bad translation and it is, good thing we had the older dead sea scrolls to reference and correct the corruption with the right translation, Sons of God. Certainly the King Jamess is not inspired why would you make such a claim? It's an ok translation.
@@Netgazum That's completely false.
Genesis 35:10 shows the truth
“And God said unto him, Thy name is Jacob: thy name shall not be called any more Jacob, but Israel shall be thy name: and he called his name Israel.”
The Dead Sea Scrolls are filled with lies and that's because they were forged, and at a later date than the ORIGINAL OLD TESTIMENT HEBREW BIBLE
@@spirit-walkerwaters4521 That is factually incorrect. Sorry but the dead sea scrolls are much older than the Hebrew masoritic texts used for the King James and no one disputes that do your research.You are not arguing any sense and as it's written in the KJV those verses make no sense. So now that the truth has been established do not lie anymore about the source material for the KJV, if you do you are just a lier.
I have KJV and KJVer , only ones i'll use. Now , I am currently in a Bible study, and I have been persecuted slightly for reading from the KJV. I understand that most of the students do not speak english as their first language. So I told them that I would read the NIV only for the class and in my personal studies I will read KJV. English is not their first language so, I was trying to be understanding when I was chosen to read a Verse out loud.
I asked God in prayer to help me understand the KJV , because I had learned about how the different translations remove Verses and Jesus' Words, I no longer wanted to read from any other Bible but the KJV. The KJV is so beautiful! and when I read from it , I feel like I am reading from the heart.
Well said! I love the KJV! Some people say it's hard to understand, to those people I say: i grew up in another country and English is my second language, if I can understand it then so can you! Besides, do a verse by verse comparison with another translation and you will find that the meaning of words have been diminished or changed, it's scary!
They understand it perfectly they hate what it says plain and simple
I find the KJV to be very succinct and eloquent at the same time. Other versions just don't portray the majesty.
I have been willfully reading the King James Bible since I was 12. I find the language, poetry and tone of the King James text to be, by far and wide, superior not only to any modern Bibles, but basically all modern American English.
Because of my fascination with the King’s English, when I was in 10th grade and we got into the Tragedy of Julias Caesar and Romeo & Juliet, I was even able to correct my English teacher’s pronunciation of the words and their meanings.
Well, the letters are in modern english without the f mean a s and so on.. Its quite understandable, and some of the words that I found that I didn't know were answered in the context.. some of them if you keep reading will answer it self.. and seriously.. you learn new words in school and people have no problem look it up.. Also we dont' rewrite hymns or shakespare.. so.. .we should have more enthusium to read the Bible and study from it... sometimes taking the time to slow down, learn is a good thing. God bless
I am going to another note... scientists use latin when creating name for things...
Amen, brother. Actually, I have noticed in modern version circles, that Christians never open the Bible when they’re discussing it. They just talk about the general idea of a particular passage. I like to open the Bible and go to the scriptures that we are discussing to be sure that we have them right, and a major reason for this it’s because I believe in God‘s perfect preserved words, and not in a general dynamic equivalence of ideas.
Garbage. SInce 'modern version circles' is basically the entire church, you don't seem to know much about this topic. BTW Gods preserved words were in HEBREW and GREEK so unless you are a scholar in these languages, you are NOT reading 'preserved words' but rather a translation thereof.
I am going to add.. scientits also dont' use modern language.. they use latin to name things because it can't change.@@rosaliebent4833
Are the many other versions responsible for the condition of the Church today? Sure is strange to hear Pastors make us laugh yet fail to tell us about sin, repentance or the wrath of God.
rlunnerstall. I say partially. If you research where the modern translations come from you'll understand. What's worse is that almost every pastor in America is against the KJV. It's actually really sad and disheartening to hear from your own pastor(s) that the KJV has "mistakes" in it or that the verse in my Bible was put in by some random person who grab a hold of the manuscript (and yes this IS being taught today). For example, "Christian" schools are teaching that in 1 John 5:7 that the three heavenly witnesses the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit is a forgery when the early church fathers quote this exact verse which predate their manuscripts! The sad part of it is that the argument that they make is the same as the Jehovah witness' argument. Check out their founder's quote in his book:
“The only text in Scripture which was ever claimed to prove, or affirm, that the Father, Son and Spirit are one, is a portion of 1 John 5:7, 8. This appears only in Manuscripts written since the fifth century, and is acknowledged by all Trinitarians to be a “forgery.” So undisputable is this, that the translators of the “Revised Version” recently published, omit the clause without note or comment, though those Revisors [sic] were themselves believers in Trinity.”
Excerpt From: David W. Daniels. “Can You Trust Just One Bible?.”
But, I know the truth, I know where my Bible comes and the ones who wrote it. I hold up the KJV/Valera 1602 Purificada high!
I've heard pastor preach he can see Jesus in ALL the versions; a number in his congregation used the Message.
Amen
@@Obediah002 Wow. The MSG is not even a translation! it shouldn't be allowed to have such a title... I'll admit I picked up a copy from the Goodwill for a buck but it's only for curiosity's sake. It's not a translation but a paraphrase
We would be doing good in our searching of Him out in His word by looking back to the language the KJV was translated from not looking for an easier read or comparing multiple versions to see what you can glean rom them all, which is really kinda nonsensical.
Too bad we have to specify which version of the Bible these days, whereas in the past little children would sing simply: "The B-I-B-L-E, yes that's the book for me! I stand alone on the Word of God, the B-I-B-L-E!" You are right on, brother. Thanks so very much. From now on, it's the KJV for me!
O the KJPCE, yes that's the book for me. I stand alone on the word of God, the KJPCE!
Unless you are Catholic, in which case you have a non-KJV Bible that is several books longer thsn the KJV. Or an Eastern Orthodox Christian, in which case you have another non-KJV Bible that is several books longer than even the Catholic one.
@@Dreamerwild Or unless you are a JW, in which case you also have a corrupt perversion of man's word, not God's word! Just saying! I used to be JW! Thank God, I know the truth now, and I'm out for GOOD!
@@sirhood1848 D C Tommy is weak...if he is even saved. Pray for him
How old are you? 90+? modern translations are BETTER which is why we use them.
Hey David Daniel, I love the King James authorize Bible and it’s the only one Bible and that’s good enough for me, brother MATTHEW LEE❤😊
God's authority and power is in the KJV I feel it
Amen.
Curt Christensen, wow, what a compelling argument.
Negative.
James Dare because I don’t agree the the kjv is the one and only translation. Ok. Lol
@@defendingthefaith.7889 I don't agree with your disagreement....
Thank you for this, I use the exact 'defense', I guess I would say, in defending my Bible usage of the King James and it's amazing the attacks that I get. God bless you and keep imparting your God inspired wisdom. God bless you brother.
Amen I was just accused of being in a cult and being demonic. All because I prefer the KJV for it's accuracy and the fruits that came from it.
Great, well said, enjoyable explanation of why KJVO, thanks, bro David Daniels!
God help you if you don't speak English and understand old English to boot. Looks like hell is your final resting place if you don't have the inspired KJV. All those poor Chinese, or Indian people. Hope they all learn old English in time to be saved.
KJV could express urgency, conviction, damnation like no other modern versions. If this is where I knew my life is done for, then I'm gonna stick with it. I choose not to err and lower the meanings of each words.
Don't force people read KJV only!!
@@tdickensheets No one is forcing anyone to read the King James Bible.... We are just pointing out the errors of your modern versions.... Your hypocrisy is noted...
@@jimd9339 Do we have freedom in USA read other Bible versions??
Yes, though I don't want to reocmmend someone read a Bible with condtrictions and corrupted doctrine. Yes, can get someone salvation but its a trjoan horse.@@tdickensheets
This is what happens when the Bible is worshipped and put on the same level of God.
Yes it’s gods word, but it’s more fluid than people realize, it’s not contained by specific words and translations, it’s here in our hearts and in our vocal traditions
It’s more fluid?! God is the same yesterday today and tomorrow.
@@Themaskedbeliever read again, I never said god changes, I said the Bible does
@@maximilian6830 the Bible is Gods word. If Gods word changes meaning God changes. They are related to each other
@@Themaskedbeliever God is not limited to a book
@@maximilian6830 shows that you don’t have a standard to lean on.
Bible before 1611 KJV 1) Tyndale in 1526
2) Coverdale in 1535
3) Matthews Bible in 1537
4) Taverners Bible in 1539
5) Great Bible in 1540
6) Geneva Bible in 1560
7) Bishops Bible in 1568
KJV ONLY!
If it is King James only, then you are saying King James is God or a prophet.
@@tonyf4991 dont be so silly
@@DJFAmenHeavy How am I wrong? Have you ever looked into the history of the King James Bible? And to say that Bible alone and none else is wrong on many levels.
Proverbs 18:1 KJV, “Through desire a man, having separated himself, seeketh
“ {and} intermeddleth with all wisdom.”
Proverbs 18:1 NKJV, “A man who isolates himself seeks his own desire;
“He rages against all wise judgment.”
Proverbs 18:1 NASB, “He who separates himself seeks {his own} desire,
“He quarrels against all sound wisdom.”
Proverbs 18:1 ESV, “Whoever isolates himself seeks his own desire;
“he breaks out against all sound judgment.”
Proverbs 18:1 DR, “He that hath a mind to depart from a friend seeketh occasions: he shall ever be subject to reproach.”
Proverbs 18:1 NIV “An unfriendly person pursues selfish ends
“and against all sound judgment starts quarrels.”
One question you need to ask is what did the word "intermeddeleth" mean and do we still use it today? for if we don't use the word anymore, then the meaning of that word might be lost to some (or most) people.
Another is what does the hebrew say, for even if you don't respect the Hebrew, it still can explain why other bibles say what they say on account of some (or most) of them are at the very least trying to follow the Hebrew here.
If the kjv sounds beautiful to you, it's because the translators made it that way on purpose. Sometimes this resulted in archaic or more latinate words cause those sounded nice back then.
It seems no English bible before the kjv had "intermeddeleth" there in proverbs 18 : 1, so you could have an issue with all of these too if you wanted :
Wycliffe(i) 1 He that wole go a wei fro a frend, sekith occasiouns; in al tyme he schal be dispisable.
Coverdale(i) 1 Who so hath pleasure to sowe discorde, piketh a quarell in euery thinge.
MSTC(i) 1 He accompanieth himself with all steadfast and healthsome doctrine, that hath a desire to it and is sequestered from company.
Matthew(i) 1 Who so hath pleasure to sow dyscorde, pyketh a quarel in euery thyng.
Great(i) 1 He accompanieth hym selfe with all steadfast & helth some doctryne, that hath a feruent desyre to it and is sequestrate from companye.
Geneva(i) 1 For the desire thereof hee will separate himselfe to seeke it, and occupie himselfe in all wisdome.
Bishops(i) 1 Who so hath an earnest desire [to wysdome] he will sequester him selfe to seeke it, and occupie him selfe in all stedfastnesse & sounde doctrine
THE OBJECTIONS HERE are breathtaking and always the same-old same-old; IN REPLY . . . Get a dictionary and learn something new.
I agree. I have other versions but the King James is my anchor.
@@henrylaurel1188 really? Yes. Christ is my main anchor. But as far as Bibles go, its KJV. Better?
But I'll
I understand how a young or a new Christian could read other versions. But I don't understand how a true born again believer could stay in these liberal watered down translations. God blessed me as a young man, letting me know that all I needed was the KJV. It was the word of God preserved perfectly for the English speaking nations. I did not have to waste precious time and effort sifting through the Westcott and Hort fabrications. What a blessing!
@@martinbaker7032 You are free to follow the Catholic and Egyptian lines of scripture, but as for me and my house, we will follow God's word.
It is, and always will be, KJV for me.
I know King James has a lot of errors but I trust in God, I tried other bibles and didn't feel comfortable with them so decided the King James and felt comfort in the way he has it written errors or not.
Most level headed and accurate comment regarding the KJV.
It doesn't have one error. Where'd you get that from?
@@markgushue9482 Isaiah 65:25 25The wolf and the lamb shall feed together, and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock: and dust shall be the serpent's meat. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain, saith the LORD.
King James Bible
Isnt it supposed to be lion and lamb?
Rachel It says the lion should eat straw like the bullock (or ox). That is saying all those creatures will get along.
I grew up om the kjv and love it. However I am very well educated and have no problem reading it However the kjv is not readable for someone with a 8th or so reading ability or someone who is not a native speaker of English
You just mentioned what made me to search for Bible translations. It bothers me when I hear pastors say " a better reading will be...." There are so many that has read and have faith in that passage and suddenly a pastor comes and cast doubt in their minds
and what are they ACTUALLY doing? Giving you a BETTER rendering of the passage ie more accurately representing what God's Word says. How can that POSSIBLY be an issue?
Just came across your channel. So good and encouraging to hear your trust in God’s holy Word! Thanks!!
The biggest problem with KJV only is most people aren't aware they aren't even using an AU1611. Spelling matters.
I have read the KJV Bible since I was able to read. I trust no other Bible, but I did the research to know that it is the only Bible that has not been corrupted by man's ideas. People love to whine about the thee's and thou's of the Bible and yet they make it more accurate. Ye is plural, thou is singular! It isn't difficult and in itself these words help ensure the KJV's accuracy!
Luke 17 : 34 anyone?
Uh, King James specifically requested that the Hampton Court Conference hsve the KJV conform to the eschatology and episcopal structure of the English Church, which charted it's own path away from the rest of Christendom when Henry the 8th couldn't get a divorce.
Human intentions are zll over this thing.
Now I feel bad for not finding this video sooner. I gave out NIV bibles thinking it was easier to read. Now people are possibly reading them 🤦
Oh dear
I use the Authorised King James but I also have an interest in bringing people to Christ. I distribute scripture for Pocket Testament League in a deprived area with low educational attainment and an NIV or NLT would be better understood than the Authorised. If it brings people to Chist that is all that is important. I was brought to Christ by being given a Gideons New Testament and Psalms at 12. It converted me so that ministry blessed me.
This is so easily debunked. The KJV translators made decisions on how to translate certain words and phrases. Why did they translate Passover in every instance except Acts 12:4 where it's translated Easter??? The italicized words in the KJV are words that they added to help understand the verse better!!
Yes sir I agree. God's words = King James Bible only. Let's have faith towards the true God only. Other books are deceiver.
God help you if you don't speak English and understand old English to boot. Looks like hell is your final resting place if you don't have the inspired KJV. All those poor Chinese, or Indian people. Hope they all learn old English in time to be saved.
Your channel is a blessing. You are doing gods work. Thank you.
Your right, and any other version produces confused people wondering what are the basic doctrines that are important to know.
Bible Translation Stuff
"In contrast to the half-dozen mainly medieval manuscripts on which the King James Version was based, we now have over five thousand New Testament manuscripts, including some extremely close to the time the New Testament books were written (by the standard used for ancient texts). These manuscripts make the New Testament by far the best-documented work of the ancient world and also explain why more accurate translations are available today than in times past."
Craig Keener
New International Version 1 Corinthians 9:27
I strike a blow to my body and make it my slave so that after I have
preached to others, I myself will not be disqualified for the prize.
King James Bible 1 Corinthians 9:27
But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway.
Why would I read anything other then the King James Bible? The NIV seriously misinterprets the original and preserved word of God.
Not so the meaning is "giving myself a black eye" why should I read the KJV when the NIV is more accurate?
@James Dare garbage. I see you avoided responding to me, non-church-goer.
Why are KJVonlyists usually such liars?
@@christshrt7686 another ignorant response. The NIV and other modern translations are the Word of God just as the KJV is, but it actually english as we speak it. Do not disgrace yourself with such disrespectful comments about God's Word. I doubt He is very impressed by it.
The NIV is an abomination
@@rosaliebent4833 I see that your comment is from 2 years ago.... I never avoid responding to people who do not believe the Bible.
Post your comments and I will enjoy discussing the Bible with you!
Romans 5:20
Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:
Hebrews 2:15
And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.
The first two minutes of this are almost unbearable. The speaker tries to make the case that a critic of KJV is relying on his "own wisdom" over "god's wisdom," but couldn't that same platitude be applied to someone advocating for KJV only? After all, the speaker is advocating for KJV ONLY, which means that you are standing above all the "authorities" found elsewhere.
At two minutes and thirty seconds he claims that KJV is "gods words," and thst it is a superior version to all the others, which AGAIN is an individual judgment being stacked against other Bibles that he is judging. Which is apparently wrong to do with KJV but not with any of the others.
How does the speaker know that the KJV is "gods words," and thst the other translations are only "mixtures with man's words."
He claims KJV has been tested, by whom? Where are the results of these tests documented? How does he measure the "prayerful, faithful people" produced by other Bibles against the KJV. How do we know his affirmation that "faithful and prayerful" people produced by the KJV are moreso than those produced by other Bibles?
He tells an anecdote about protecting his finances. Would the NIV have not protected his finances as well? What about ESV? He doesn't compare those proverbs between versions of the Bible, he just lists KJV versions and calls them God's words without telling us how he knows that they are God's words.
He claims that KJV "says things right," and that KJV doesn't self contract. Can he demonstrate that claim?
Can he demonstrate his claim that other versions cause doubt and the KJV doesn't? He just makes assertions without providing evidence that his claims are true. How does he know what god wants? How does he know that the KJV is what god wants?
He has many videos with the evidence.
@@henrylaurel4476 : You are lying about him, he uses evidence to support the claim that the Received Text is copied from the originals and the Westcott and Hort Text is from corruptions.
@@henrylaurel1188 : The KJV Text is from the originals,kept pure by scribes throughout all these years, martyrs to preserve them, the Westcott and Hort Text is from a corrupted stream eventually out of the Vatican, of course you are free to read and study the corruptions, but what a waste of time.
@@golightly5121 There are several problems with the KJV. Those manuscripts you mentioned? They were not perfect or inspired. The Maseritic texts for the old testament were VERY late, dating to around the 10th century. The Textus Receptis for the new testament was written by a Dutch scholar who had incomplete greek manuscripts and had to back-translate a bunch from latin ones.
Earlier manuscripts, closer to the originals, have been discovered since the KJV was written. The KJV was written before the Dead Sea Scrolls or the Codex Siniacus were discovered. These texts are archeological finds, and modern translations are largely based on them. They were burried in sand and preserved in pots! So your claims of a catholic conspiracy to alter the text and hide the intent of the originals makes no sense here.
@@Dreamerwild : Which modern translation is perfect, pure and preserved?
I have explained the KJB in many ways over the past 35 years. Nearly every Christian says the same thing, "I don't see the difference." Why do they say this, well because most simply don't "mediate day and night" on the word. There is only a remnant that stays in the 'word' day and night (many times a day and at night). Those that do, for the most part, will find the differences between the KJB and other bibles.
what a pile of drivel. Like every other conspiracy theorist you abuse those who disagree with you. You are ignorant.
@@terryford6783 Ignorance is your cult, simpleton. There were no other bibles around for 270 years after the KJB took hold except the corrupt Roman Catholic trash bible which all MV's use the same trash manuscripts that the RCC used for their trash bible.
@@rosaliebent4833 They don't disagree with me, but with God, it's His word, I'm just the messenger. Get a clue simpleton!
@@craigluchin4585 the Word of God says NOTHING about some English translation 1600 years after the Bible was written. what an idiotic argument.
I will NEVER let another sinful man tell me about my own salvation. I will read it for myself in God's word.... And in English, that is the King James...
If you read the original preface by the actual translators who never said it was not the perfect one, and they did not go against previous translations also.
I've never read a cogent argument about what is wrong with the KJV, and how a new translation fixes what is wrong with the KJV.
ESV
you might want to actually try READING a modern translation because your ignorance is showing.
@@rosaliebent4833 still haven't.
@@douglasbrinkman5937 thats what ignorance is - totally proud of being uninformed and wrong.
Let's ignore the many additions to the New Testament (like 1 John 5:7-8) and just go into the fact that it is written in a dead language that nobody speaks and most people don't understand and leave it at that.
Greek and Hebrew are dead? Surely you jest.
The Way if you can’t understand the KJV you really need to get an education. I’ve never had a problem understanding it other then maybe a couple obsolete words which are easy enough to look up.
The first Bible that I read is the Kings James Bible version it is accurate when it comes to the words it is clean and crisp the rest of the bottles of this translations the Kings Kings James Bible the original you know that the Kings James Bible is the best version out there
you mean like how it used the latin word 'lucifer' instead of the actual translation of the word which means LIGHT? or perhaps how it called Pentecost 'Easter' - a pagan festival. There are MANY errors in the KJV that modern translations correct.
No it is not
I like how you refute David. You do it with Love.
Good job sir... God bless
I PROVED to a Pastor that his translation was wrong. It didn't matter. I will from this point on go with the KJV Only. It matters to me.
Here's extreme detail and proofs... if you'd like
ruclips.net/video/5ZsZLDWWZMs/видео.html
Luke 17 : 34
The KJV is the only version that I understand!
AMEN! The authors have watered down the NIV, NASB, ESV, etc, to make it fit their belief system! But is it God's Holy Word? NOT AT ALL! IT'S MAN'S WORD, NOT GOD'S WORD
@@martinbaker7032 You have been lied to... Yes there was a Bible before the King James Bible. Your issue is that you are following the Westcott & Hort only cult.... They are just like their "daddy", he showed up in Genesis 3:1... He also said "...yea hath God said..."
The King James Bible is not "just" a translation. It is the pure preserved word of God for English speaking people of today.
Your Westcott & Hort only cult makes no sense.
@@martinbaker7032 You are a fool.... **Bible believers are not part of a cult** The King James Bible is against the devil... Your Westcott & Hort only cult is promoting modern English translations! They (modern translations) promote doctrines of devils!
You should check yourself! You are working for your father the devil himself! He too said "Yeah hath God said?" (Genesis 3:1)
You are also not very educated.... You missed part of what I said... But then your father the devil is a pro at taking things out of *CONTEXT* If you are promoting modern translations you are part of the Westcott & Hort only cult.
@@martinbaker7032 BTW The King James Bible is not "just a translation" it is the very word of God in English for English speaking people...
@@martinbaker7032 Bible believers are not in a cult... We believe God...
God said:
Psalm 12:6 The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
Psalm 12:7 Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.
Matthew 24:35 Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.
I Peter 1:23 Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.
I Peter 1:24 For all flesh is as grass, and all the glory of man as the flower of grass. The grass withereth, and the flower thereof falleth away:
I Peter 1:25 But the word of the Lord endureth for ever. And this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you.
Sadly you Westcott & Hort only cultists do not believe God.
You do not have a pure Bible... I do! You do not trust God. I do. You worship the intellect.... I don't. God is smarter than you...
When Tyndale later translated the Pentateuch (Genesis - Deuteronomy) from the Hebrew, he used the word "Passover" throughout, so why "Easter" in the New Testament? Probably because the Greek word for Passover, "Πάσχα" (Pascha) does not have an actual meaning in Greek. Instead, it is a transliteration from the Hebrew "פֶּסַח" "Pesach." In Hebrew, the word literally means "Passover," so in the Old Testament, Tyndale was translating the word's actual meaning. In the Greek, however, the word had no meaning and was simply the proper name of a Holiday. By that time, most Greeks used the word to refer to the now separate holiday known in English as "Easter." Thus, ignorant of the roots of the word at the time he was translating the New Testament, Tyndale used "Easter" to translate "Pascha." It is a quite understandable error!
Acts 12:4 in KJV is wrong, given that the Greek term is pascha, "passover". Does the Greek NT, for that matter, anywhere reference any 'pagan' so-called 'holyday' by name? I don't think so. If Luke by inspiration had wanted to reference "Easter" (from the goddess Astarte/Ashtoreth, etc. forms of spellings) I guess there would have been an unambiguous term for it readily available in the Greek tongue. facebook.com/KJVOnlyismRefuted/?ref=page_internal
AMEN
This seems like you're adding the KJV to the Godhead. Like idolatry.
You should watch the video and listen to what you said.
I wanted KJV onlyism to be right. It's not. And just because it would be nice doesn't mean it's correct.
Faithful would be looking at the whole picture and take the time to look. It's not as bad or confusing as it seems. You can get the same doctrine from the more acceptable versions. I prefer the KJV everytime. But it's not perfect. It's just the facts. I have no agenda for this.
But I wonder if many Baptists aren't guilty of clinging to weaker portions of KJV to protect unbiblical doctrine through appeals to specific word translations that are more diverse in the context of the original culture and the nuance of meaning.
. I.e. E.C.T HELL
Many people just dont put in the effort required to come to the correct conclusion. There is a lot! I started out reading paralel Bibles, and asking myself what the the differences actualy are. It didnt take long to come to the conclusion that we take God at His word, not translators...
King James Bible only for me ... the devil has done an excellent job diluting & twisting the Holy Bible thru PER-versions ... confusion & dissension are the result!
And I might add ... some VERY spiritually weak saints is another tragic result of PER-versions!! :(
Another thing I also noticed is they lack dissernment. So sad. GOD BLESS
+Debra Gill -- "So sad" that OTHERS are "lacking discernment? Try AGAIN! You are there listening to a guy who professes Christ, bash another daily - who also professes Christ, and THAT is *poor discernment* as one of them is a man of God and one is a spoiled brat. People need to decide which is which, though God already has.. Christ would probably say both need to grow up..but you are there STILL ..EVERY day listening to Eddie bash Bryan.. NO discernment in that. Proper discernment is what Apostle Paul said to do when he said: "from such, turn away" - as I did. You need discernment yourself..you largely lack it, and yes, it IS sad! You STILL comment that you '"agree" with Eddie...EVERY day.. *Total lack of any discernment* - You..Eddie..all of them...the Bible says GOSSIP is abomination in Romans 1 and that's ALL Eddie is doing making 943839248293 videos about Bryan.. ONE day, Jesus will tell him.. THAT is what it is going to take.. for you too? OR will you learn discernment while there is still time?? Jesus is *coming soon!*
and yet EVERY pseudo-cult uses the KJV as its basis
I don’t have a KJV. I have a NKJV and a Cepher. I read the Bible daily but I have trouble memorizing to the extent that I would like to. I am going to invest in a KJV and see if it makes a difference.
right i have the cepher also i believe its YAH Word
You don't really know if the KJV Bible is without errors. so sir you take it by faith.
Now your getting it.....
Actually it has many translation errors, which KJV only cultists refuse to acknowledge.
denleemel yet you post no proof, because you have none. Just like the countless other comments out there of people running their mouth saying God’s word has errors, but never can seem to post any proof. Here’s some proof that it has NO errors.
www.kjvtoday.com/home/reliable-hebrew-text
www.av1611.org/kjv/fight.html#fight15
Justin h
Genesis 1:1
Did God create the heaven or heavens?
@Jason Wilkins - The Bible SAYS that it is without error. Read 2 Timothy 3:16-17. (I shouldn't have to tell you that if you studied the Bible)
Hey can anybody help me out there, there are some verses in the old testament that mean exactly opposite in anything other than the king James Bible, I had him pinned down in my old Bible app but it changed. I’m hoping you guys can help me remember some of them. Because I’ve completely forgotten them.❤
Your videos are sooooooooooo good !
Hello everyone and shalom 🕊 I got an email from chick tracts from where I order most of my tracts from and Brother David's book on King James was being promoted. I love love love my King James Bible! I believe that it's the authoratative word of God and is anointed. Mathew 28:19 which reads Go ye therefore, and teach(1)all nations (and) the side note says- (make disciples of). I read in the email sent to me in one of the 51 ways which said this very passage interpretation. Its in my King James bible! Now do I not continue reading the side notes of interpretations or not? I mean should I not trust the (dare I say) scripture references? I fell like saying.. what gives Sam!? 😊 Im a little muddled... I will be praying about this probably right after or soon after posting my comment. God bless all 🙏🏽 Shalom and come Lord Jesus!!!
Absolute truth has mistakes - According to who, and compared to what, other "bibles" full of mistakes and your opinion aka relative truths?!
The original... - Give me a perfect copy, oh it only exists in heaven according to relative truth.
Well, the Holy Spirit.... - oh the same Holy Spirit you know about from relative truths.
I mean logically... - logically you can't even prove without absolute truth that there is anything real outside your mind.
Keep arguing Bible correcting relativist God wannabes.
"Now the scholar was more subtil than any educator of the field which the
LORD God had made. And he said unto the believer, Yea, hath God said that really, here's what He meant" ... I'm sure this is the best translation for scholars and popes.
Hey bro...the other versions were written by men who didn't even believe sound biblical doctrine. Read a brief history below:
followingjesuschrist3.com/2015/10/24/the-bible-version-controversy-a-brief-history/
Sola Scriptura
I think you misinterpreted what I wrote, visit my channel :)
will do amigo...and glad to hear it.
Send us an email at arisetopottershouse@gmail.com for we are in Florida also. Good article btw.
This encouragement could not have come at a better time!
King James Only-ism is a cult. If you prefer KJV, that's fine. It's a great translation. I read it quite often. But to say, "you're only going to be saved by reading the KJV," or, "all modern translations are from the devil," is a sign that you have no idea how we got the KJV in the first place.
Daric other "bibles" have mistakes, the KJV has none. Which book is better than the KJV? If you can think of one, why do you still use the KJV? If you can't think of one, why do you use any other bible?
Sean Lawler
You seriously don't understand the history of the bible's transmission and translation process if you can seriously say to someone that the KJV has no problems with it and mean it. It shows complete ignorance of how it came about, as if angels came down from heaven with the KJV bible already translated into English. Go read White's "King James Only Controversy". You'll be much more informed and won't make such an ass of yourself when you talk.
show me one mistake.
ok ill show you one.. Romans 8.26 calls the Holy Spirit "it" The Holy Spirit is a person not a thing.
www.chick.com/catalog/books/1271.asp
Daric, Click this link an get this book. It will show you what is missing from non KJV Bibles. I can buy you the book if you'd like. :-)
It's not a disease it's a cult.
@Power Lister -- Call it a cult. We'll see what God has to say about it one day, since you clearly choose man's words over God's. I'll stay in "CULT" and believe GOD. You are welcome to believe MEN - which is AGAINST the word of God.. but you're blind, and saved believers are not blind.
@@TheMistysFavs does your salvation depend on which translation you read from?
I only trust the KJV. Thank you, god bless.
If that is the case then I suspect that you believe that when God divided up the nations he did so according to the number of the children of Israel. Which would be silly of course since they were not around at the time of the tower of babel when God divided up the nations of the earth. Hmm, I wonder what other issues exist in the KJV?
Then you have turned that Bible into an idol instead of something Holy. And turned King James into God or the very least a prophet.
Am I missing something here? I got an email from chick tracts saying that the word "teach" in the King James version should not be make disciples of all nations where in fact that is what it means in the commentaries that I discovered. Is Chick tracts wrong on this matter? I order mostly from chick tracts to hand out as I share the good news, my testimony etc. Any thoughts?
I think, as important as the King James version is, you are making a mountain out of a mole hill!
God's pure, preserved words are not a small issue... The modern versions, all of them, weaken major Bible doctrines.
@@jimd9339God had his Word established over a millenia before the KJV saw the light of day.
The Church was also in existence over 1,500 years before there was the KJV.
Do you reduce God to being contained within the pages of that one version of Scripture? Sure sounds that way.
Do the modern versions truly weaken any doctrine of the Christian faith? I will grant you, that I prefer the Formal Equivalent translations, but God can draw people to Himself, using even a poorer paraphrase, if it speaks to their heart and soul .
I ask again, do you limit God?
@@jimd9339 except not a SINGLE doctrine is in any way altered or minimised, trump supporter.
@@rosaliebent4833 Except you are a troll... You got me! I now know better... Enjoy your darkness Marxist.
Thanks for sharing that with us David!
Right now you are making the KJV the standard... why not make the Greek and Hebrew manuscripts the standard. You realize the TR does not read like any known manuscript. Erasmus (the man who put together the TR which the KJV was translated from) was a Roman Catholic priest who dedicated the TR to Pope Leo X and couldn't even get the copy right the first time. Let alone his statement regarding I John 5:7... he was fighting against the Latin Vulgate which was uses for 1100 years... just because the KJV has been used for 400 years doesn't define superiority. After dealing with Erasmus' known errors you have to deal with Beza's Conjectural Emendations. I use the KJV, but I have to, as a Bible believer, discern the Word for myself through the Spirit.
You use so much circular reasoning in this video is frightening. What's even more frightening is that people are following that faulty logic. Please hold the KJV to the same are just. Using preference instead of logic is faulty as well. You are comparing other versions to the KJV, you could use that argument for any version out there. If I used the NASB primarily and compared all versions to that the NASB would be the standard and the KJV would fall short. There are places in the KJV where some words are not translated as accurate as they could be, they don't have bad translations, but it could make things clearer. (Doctrine of hell, etc.)
This is just a small fraction of a percentage of the arguments against your faulty logic. I'm not into RUclips debates so I won't respond but I just encourage every man to grow is wisdom and grace like Christ did. Study things out for yourself. Look into textual studies. Don't just listen to faulty logic. If you prefer the KJV, then great! It's a great translation. But to say it's the only, or best, translation you would have to have yourself compared all other versions in a fair and balanced review.
I am a King James Only person. I have a problem with something I read today, which made me pretty upset. I decided that to help me memorize more of Philippians is to write it down word for word. I came to where Paul said bowels and mercies and in my KJ there was a footnote “affection”. Can you explain the use of this word, which to me in modern English, is offensive?The New KJ corrects this.
but isnt the KJV 'perfect' according to you and your cult?
God bless you David Daniel 🙏 thank you for reaching us the KJV Bible
I’ve read the King James Bible since I was a teenager. All of the other Bibles around then have gone. Only the King James remains. I suspect that the same will happen to the modern Bibles available today.
so silly. so incorrect. modern translations outsell the KJV 10 to 1.
What about the 1560/1599 Geneva bibles?
Please, I love the size of that bible your holding. What brand/model # is that? I want to order it. It looks like genuine leather too. Thanks, Jose.
I think its a Holman KJV compact. But this specific model is no longer in print, but you still can find a Holman Large Print Compact at Amazon with prices ranging from $10 bucks for Bonded Leather to $30 bucks for genuine cowhide leather. It's not the SAME but is pretty close.
I would like to say I have tried reading the NASB but it just seems like another best selling novel, I do not get the same intense spiritual coaching as I do with the KJV.
The NIV, NAS, ESV and other translations are all God's Word the same as the KJV. It is a good thing to have different translations to better understand the Bible
Don't take this wrong but you are quite ignorant. Study.
@@martinbaker7032 I reckon that Reed Scott is a kjvo.
Kevin Jodrey it’s not all of Gods word or even Gods word if it leaves out scripture or changes the meaning of words which isn’t what God said or what he meant. I’ve been comparing versions when I read and see fairly big discrepancies in the NIV and ESV to the point I can’t trust either translation.
Henry Laurel God doesn’t say that. But a thorough study with an open mind will lead you to the conclusion that the critical text has been messed with and that the KJV did Not add verses and additional words.
Henry Laurel I never stated I’m an Onlyest. And even if I was it’s not a cult so don’t make claims you can’t verify. Stating what you did is called lying so obviously you have no problem doing what you accuse others of which also makes you a hypocrite. It’s also a lie that scribes added all of this words. I’ve done my research so if you want to keep making false accusations I’ll let you take that up with the one who will hold you accountable. It’s unbelievable that the liberal Christians of this day have swallowed hook line and sinker the deception of the devil.
Sounds like a very good explanation to me. One example of a major disappointment I've had before was with the Classical Amplified translation. Thought I had a translation brought to my attention that gave accurate elaborations but later on come to find out they are basically just opinions or theoretics, educated guesses for lack of a better way to put it, those "guesses" as I put it can still hold substance maybe? But still were based on opinion. Should seem so simple, I just am looking for accurate elaborations on certain verses that I believe could use more explanation in the English language. Still am going to be cautious against some KJV-only'ers due to the fact that not all KJV-only'ers are not all necessarily going to have the same doctrine or beliefs despite believing in the same translation, get the impression that a lot (not all) KJV-only'ers can have very inhibiting/ignorant religious mindsets. Nonetheless find this to be an excellent explanation as to why to stick with only the KJV for the English language.
Your videos are beyond incredible, I have had the look what missing books and have given them out, now I need the same KJV, insert , and the other dictionary , you talked about
Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.
I've also noticed that the most anointed preachers use the KJV in their personal quiet time with the Lord. I think that says a lot about the KJV. When anointed men of God meditate on His Word, their preferred Bible for themselves is the KJV.
This is true for Kenneth Hagin, Benny Hinn, TD Jakes, and Joseph Prince.
They often preach using NKJV and sometimes in other versions, but when they talk about personal stories on when they're reading the Bible in they're own time, the Bible they use is the KJV.
They don't say it explicitly, I just noticed it because I've listened on a lot of their teachings, and read a lot of their books.
For example is Kenneth Hagin's story on how he got healed when he was very young. He got so sick that his blood was yellowish, and he felt he was very close to dying. But he read Mark 11:23, decided to believe it and declare it. He declared it with a vengeance again and again and suddenly he felt something trickle from his head to his body, like honey. From that moment on, he was completely healed. I've read this story on one of his books, and I noticed that the Mark 11:23 he was reading and declaring was the KJV.
Joseph Prince told a story in a preaching of when he was doing his quiet time, studying His Word.
He was asking the Lord about a particular verse that seemed to contradict other verses. Eventually, after reading the verse again and again, the Lord spoke to him and gave him a revelation. When he told this story, he specifically quoted from the KJV because that's what he was reading in his quiet time. I noticed it because he shifted from NKJV. He normally uses the NKJV when preaching.
TD Jakes and Benny Hinn normally use the KJV in their preachings and books. TD Jakes sometimes makes his audience laugh when reading the KJV because he says "ass" which is old word for donkey.
What is sad is you think these socalled ministers of God are anointed!! All the ones you listed teach false and unbiblical doctrine.
You might want to widen you list of people you listen to and perhaps consider people considerably younger as well.
Smith Wigglesworth and Charles Finney, both KJV men
All four men you mentioned are false teachers! Ironic.
@@glennomac7499 back in a time where there were NO OTHER OPTIONS. is that the best you can do?
There is no way that the King James Bible will cease to be in use! There will always be an intensely loyal following who will
prefer it! On the other hand, there are other versions which with variations are every bit as good. I am a Christian who has
more than a superficial knowledge of these things; I personally prefer the New English, and the Revised Standard Version,
with the Apocrypha which some Christians like, and many scorn.
Question: How do you know which is which?
Answer: Holy Ghost/Holy Spirit
I prefer the KJV due to Tyndale's influence. I'm not kjv only in any strict sense.
Brandon sets himself above God and his pure word?
@@herbbearingseed no, he doesn't. Next question.
Kjv was a bit more literal with the Latin vulgate than Tyndale's translation was.
@@anonymousperson6462 They did not use the Latin Vulgate because it is a Catholic manuscript. The King James Bible translators used a different Latin... It was in the right line of Manuscripts.
@@jimd9339 kjv is catholic. It had anglocatholic translators, used the bishops Bible and the rheims new testament.
It is also trusting in your own wisdom to decide the KJV is the only Word of God when God doesn't say that.
My friend. Your argument is so convoluted it makes no sense. For instance. The NASB is said to be the best (not perfect) translation we have in English to date. Not because I say so, but because the body of scholars who work with the manuscripts have said so. By the way, it's the Adventists through the work of Benjamin G Wilkinson (Our Authorized Bible Vindicated 1930) that brought in the modern KJV Only trend when JJ Ray and David Otis Fuller copied him and published their work in 55 and 75.
KJVO has been around over 100 years.
The NASV was translated from the Codex Vaticanus. It is a bible based on Alexandrian gnosticism.
The KJVO while not a disease is definitely a disorder, no doubt about it. A translation has to be judged by it's accuracy to the text it is translating. We should be extremely familiar with the underlying texts of our translation, in this case the TR, and make it our yardstick that all translations are measured by instead of measuring all translations by the KJV.
So, to read a perfect Bible I need to learn Greek and Hebrew expertly? The more than fifty scholars, the best of the best, did it already!
@@henrylaurel1188 : The two different manuscript streams disagree with you, I am overjoyed with Antioch, you suffer through Alexandrian.
"Further Thoughts on the
Word of God" -
__chapt. 4 Understanding Inspiration
...A man who waits for manuscript evidence to establish his confidence in the King James Bible is like a man who wants a DNA sample before he can trust the blood of Christ.
---John M. Asquith
Amen brother!
I need some help folks. First, I love the Chicks Tracts ministry ever since I was a child. I have learned much scripturally from you in my life. I personally grew up with the King James and thus, I love it. That being said. Is there no modern translation into contemporary language that meets muster? Common sense would suggest that there is?
Second: Biblical translations other than English? Explain the King James Bible version in languages other than English.
@vdaugg ---- You ask: "Is there no modern translation into contemporary language that meets muster?" Common sense would suggest that there is? Well, common sense is WRONG here. How is it common sense to read God's words MIXED with man's words? David just clearly explained that. NOT ONE other Bible than the King James is God's words ONLY... NOT ONE.. People have NO idea of how great a deception those "versions" truly are. I know nothing about foreign languages, but the KJB in ANY language is God's OWN words and NONE of man's word included. If you want to trust MAN, feel free - but it is your soul at stake. As I said and David agrees, EVERY Bible version contains MAN's words and thus IS a deception. Both Proverbs AND the Apostle Peter repeating the verse in Acts is clear: "We ought to obey God and NOT men." I pray this "wakes you up" to the deception you seem to have fallen under.
@@TheMistysFavs what are you talking about?! I just asked for some help with some sincere questions . You are not being helpful.
@@TheMistysFavs Not one OTHER English translation since 1881 is God's word.
you ran into the crazies of KJVonlyism which is a cult of conspiracy theorists. The Word of God is unchangeable but the language(s) that people use IS and does, change. Modern translations so little more than retranslate the original into the language of the day. But cultists like KJVonlyists cannot cope with that because they worship the translation, not the God of the translation.
@@rosaliebent4833 You are so off your rocker... The devil has you in his grips... Let me help... **YOU NEED REAL HELP**
You ran into the crazies of Westcott & Hort onlyism which is a cult of conspiracy theorists. The Word of God is unchangeable and when the word of God is copied *OR* translated into different languages the language(s) that people use IS and does change *BUT* God's promises to keep His words preserved and pure throughout *EVERY GENERATION* will *NEVER* fail nor will those promises ever change.
You said: "Modern translations so little more than retranslate the original into the language of the day."
Response: You are so indoctrinated into the devil's cult that you believe that God is a liar and is impotent. It is really sad that you have such a puny lying god. My God is *OMNIPOTENT* and is able to keep His words pure in any language and He has for us English speaking people in the King James Bible.
The translators of your weak and perverted modern bibles have an agenda hence the reason for their major changes.
God warned His people, the Jews as well as the Christians 3 times in the Bible not to change the Bible, His word, by addition or subtraction. You are so full of the devil that you are stuck labeling Bible believers as "conspiracy theorists" (as if that gives credence to your silly conspiracy theory) and "cult members" as if that helps your weak position of rejecting the word of God.
You said: But cultists like KJVonlyists cannot cope with that because they worship the translation, not the God of the translation."
Response: You are so full of the devil that it is doubtful that you even have ever read or studied the King James Bible and here you sit, as a Pharisee, judging Bible believers saying that us *BIBLE BELIEVERS* are in a cult.
We do praise the word of God because praising the word of God (a form of worship) is Biblical. It is also a way of worshiping the God of the Bible.
Psalm 56:4 *In God I will praise his word* in God I have put my trust; I will not fear what flesh can do unto me.
Psalm 56:10 **In God will I praise his word: in the LORD will I praise his word**
Psalm 56:11 In God have I put my trust: I will not be afraid what man can do unto me.
You do not know God or you would not call God a liar. Ye are of your father the devil... That fool showed up in the Bible in Genesis 3:1 questioning God's word! You are just like him!!!!
You should get out of the cult that you are in, *REPENT* of your sin and trust the Lord Jesus Christ as your Saviour! Then you too could understand the Bible. I Corinthians 2:14 is in effect *UNTIL* you get saved.... I pray that you will repent and believe the Gospel.
How do you understand all the old words of the king james bible what do i use
Use a dictionary online
The KJV Bible's Built in Dictionary ruclips.net/video/6wetBMS5cLw/видео.html
Webster's 1828 dictionary, A crudens or strong's concordance. Scripture interprets scripture.. remember. So if something isn't clear in one place is more clear in another.
Always pray first in humility, for wisdom & guidance. It isn't just a textbook. It is his Holy Word. Spiritual things are Spiritually discerned.
I'd like to add that in fact my King James bibles side notes says in Matthew 28 vs 19 "teach"1* (make disciples of). If we should stick with King James only which I love btw are we not supposed to follow the references (of) our King James bibles? This don't make no sense tat all !! 😜😝 Love to hear a response from Chick Tracts 🤔hmm perhaps I should email them...
Prov.21:1, The king's heart is in the hand of the LORD, as the rivers of water: He turneth it whithersoever He will. Prov.22:21, That I might make thee know the certainty of the words of truth; that thou mightest answer the words of truth to them that send unto thee...I am so thankful that the LORD preserved His words, though all the enemies of the truth rage on, and the KJV is certain proof of that. The history of the English Bible (textus receptus) is marvelous in our eyes!
@@martinbaker7032
You can find out about the history of the English bible on youtube now.
It's called The Indestructible Book, by Ken Connolly... over 3hrs. and very exciting info
@@martinbaker7032
You are correct though, as many quote parts of verses out of context, and very few know Hebrew and Greek grammar and bible definitions of words. If you have a thirst for truth 'as it is in Jesus', there are a couple places you can learn from: IAmKoine and Grace and Truth, both on youtube.
I also recommend The Complete Word Study New Testament, edited by Spiros Zodhiates, and dictionary. There is also the ones for the OT... I use the KJV version for reasons of believing the TR to be least 'corrupted' for lack of a better word.
Hope you too receive 'the love of the truth'!
@@martinbaker7032
I am not KJV only, yet I do prefer TR versions of the text. Knowing the history of the English bible may give you more insight, as I've researched this most of my life through hundreds of sources. Yet, every man must 'be persuaded in his own mind' ( to borrow a phrase from Paul ).
The Indestructible Book may still be in print (Baker Books). If not you might find a copy on the internet... maybe Abe Books or Google.
An example of accuracy is Jn.3:7,
'Marvel not that I said unto thee (singular pronoun), Ye (plural pronoun) must be born again'... meaning Jesus was speaking to one person, telling him that all must be born 'of the Spirit'.
What I know for sure about you if you are a KJV Bible believer?
I know you are trinitarian => 1 John 5:7,8
I know you believe that was God himself Who manifested in the flesh to save us => 1 Tim 3:16
I know you believe that someone can only be baptized if they believe in Jesus Christ, the Son of God, with all their heart => Acts 8:37
I know that you believe in the Eternal Condemnation of Hell => MANY SCRIPTURES THAT WERE REMOVED/CHANGED FROM MODERN BIBLE PERVERSIONS.
Brother David, if possible, do a video about this subject: 'What I Know for sure about KJV Bible Believers?'
This is an enormous advantage that few people think about, after all, all cults and false religions believe in the 'bible', but not in the Bible! What result in confusion; they do not even agree about the BASIC aspects of the Christian faith, for everyone only believe in a bible that does not exist in the real world.
Three persons is polytheism. God is one. Too many scriptural proofs for that.
Deut six :4. John eight :24,27. etc etc.
What you say is utter garbage>modern translations do not ary one iota from the KJV on all doctrine, small or large.
Why are you people so ignorant and uninformed
@@martinbaker7032 YOu make an interesting point that KJV-onlyists seem to worship the Bible rather than God. Meanwhile, God's Living Word, translated into hundreds of languages and versions thereof continue to bless and multiply the Church thus negating their silly idea that they are 'satanic'. Personally, I think KJVonlyists are morons.
2Tim 2:15 in the NIV builds self-righteous works, While The KJV builds faith and a Relationship with Jesus.
NIV 2Tim 2:15. {{{{{ Do your best }}}}} to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth.
KJV 2Tim 2:15. {{{{{{ Study }}}}}} to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
I'll Stick to the KJV...
I've been loyal to NKJV my whole Christian life because that's what my church uses. But you've convinced me to get a KJV instead. I completely agree that the notes in NKJV causes confusion. I've also always felt more inspiration (the rhema kind) in the KJV. It's just I've let the "thee", "thou", "ye" in KJV intimidate me before. But the true God-breathed, quickened Word is more important than my intimidation. It is completely possible to train your mind to read in old world English, and I will do that. After all, I have the Spirit of God in me to open my understanding even with all the old English words.
I have a question though, what do you think of the Updated King James Version or UKJV?
Someone made a translation of the KJV and only changed the thee, thou, ye, thine stuff. He made it available online without a copyright so everyone can use (unlike NIV, ESV, NKJV and others who copyrights and charges a fee for their version of the word of God). Just google UKJV to see his website and the complete UKJV text. That's the website that actually directed me to your channel.
Elisha Star the kjv was once copyrighted as well. The kjv wasn't the first translation. I recommend the tyndale new testament or NMB to you instead.
Nathan Skip Or the WEB. That one was NEVER copyrighted, because the copyright was waived.
Thee and thou are singular. Ye is plural. See John 3:7
NKJV is superior.
you will find very little difference but it DOES use actual modern pronouns making it a lot easier to read. The KJV WAS a good translation in its time but english has moved on and the KJV now has words no one understands or worse... have changed in meaning. 1 COr 13... what does 'charity' mean?
By this logic would reading scriptures in their original languages be best? I speak Latin (thank you college classics requirements) so the Vulgate bible is open to me, but if I recall correctly much of the New Testament was written in Koine Greek, and the Old Testament was of course written in ancient Hebrew.
You make a good argument that the KJV is a trustworthy translation -- and if its translation was divinely inspired then there really isn't an issue -- but could a shadow of doubt about *any* translation be removed by reading the bible as it was originally recorded? I've heard that some idioms and literary devices don't translate well from one language to the next.
RUclips: gipp where are the originals
Watch the 90 minute version.
Starxteel KJB1611 I noticed you post Dr. Gipp's sermons on your channel, and would like to thank you for that here. :O)
You are welcome :)
Starxteel KJB1611 and it's just a coincidence you disable comments on your videos.
People need be told about the 1611KJV and be encouraged to read the opochryphal books.Did you know that without the book of Maccabees,you will not understand John:10:21 about the day of dedication/Hannukah?
Why why why do people try to claim idolatry at people staying true to GODS WORD. This is just proof of the conditioning of our society, why has the church fallen so far away from God AT THE MOMENT that we all started to fall from the King James, unless the versions that we are using are not God's word?
your argument is idiotic and best and unbalance at worst.
I'm not being a jerk. I am sincere.
Aren't you making the argument that:
1) God created the KJV Bible.
2) Therefore the KJV Bible is right because it was created by God.
Isn't it fair to say that there is no such thing as a perfect English translation of the Bible? Even translating something like a fairy tale or simple story can cause issues. Are you going to be extremely literal or accurate to the intent? Sometimes these might be the same, but it seems to me like they are not always. Let me know what you think.
The issue is with the manuscripts from which EVERY modern translation comes from. They used the corrupted Westcott & Hort Greek.
The King James Bible translators used the Masoretic Text for the OT and the Received Texts for the NT. The King James Bible comes from the pure preserved line of Manuscripts... Modern translations don't.
I have a number of questions:
a) who doesn't want us to use the KJV? I know the devil is behind it all, but who's the human face behind the movement on earth?
b) why? I get Satan's motive, but what's the excuse (and argument) that the earthly guys use to justify their position.
c) how/why can we be sure that the KJV is true while other versions are not?
a) people who care about Gods Word being in peoples ACTUAL language
b) The Devil probably is happen about the KJVO argument coz the word of God gets less understandable.
c) Listen to actual experts. They are around and NONE are KJVO
@@rosaliebent4833 I don't think "experts" are the ones to listen to. They are always great at leading you exactly nowhere.
What the Bible says is:
1 John 2:27
But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
You think maybe the Bibleay be right?
@@blazeovich class conspiracy theorist thinking. ignore ALL the experts because 'you' know better. Guess you're an anti-vaxxer too, right?
You teach with authority David.
Yes the authority to condemn all that don't read the only word of God. God help you if you don't speak English and understand old English to boot. Looks like hell is your final resting place if you don't have the inspired KJV. All those poor Chinese, or Indian people. Hope they all learn old English in time to be saved.
@@Netgazum Well that's just plain silly. Of course the Bible should be translated into every possible language. We simply believe the most authoritative and honest sources should be used for the basis of those translations. Of course those sources would be the Greek and Hebrew manuscripts that were used for the King James Authorized Version and it's predecessors. We reject the lessor manuscripts of highly suspect origin promulgated by the Roman Church that popped out of nowhere in the mid 1800s and seized upon by the German Rationalists and of late foisted upon the ignorant in the form of the new age 'bibles'.
@@henrylaurel1188 The Jack Chick cult.