All know that it’s supported by ISI. Also our security lapse. Then couldn’t act on it properly when it was in India. Shame on our history. Political failure as well
Series based on past events should be evaluated primarily on factual grounds rather than through the lens of contemporary perspectives, which are often influenced by hyper-nationalism. This black-and-white approach hinders our understanding of complex realities. The series' portrayal of terrorists using code names like 'Doctor,' 'Bhola,' 'Burger,' and 'Shankar' aligns with documented facts, reportedly listed on a government website, possibly the Ministry of External Affairs. While I found the series to be decent, it didn't reach the quality of 'Patal Lok' or 'Family Man.' The hype surrounding it was excessive. Veer Sanghvi's article in The Print highlights several instances where the series failed to accurately depict the involvement of the ISI. Given these factors, it's essential to understand the filmmakers' research methods and how Anubhav chose to portray the real-life experiences of the hostages. While creative liberties are acceptable, it's crucial to avoid distorting facts. The disappointment expressed by Mr. Sharma, the chief steward, suggests that the series may have been rushed and lacked sufficient research
@@jaspalsingh2075 not sure if he had the authority to decide, I think best decision was taken under the circumstances as in the exchange which took place
I am very surprised at this piece by Print. Does not seem like Shanker and/or his team has seen the show. I think last episode talks about ISI having planned and aided. Ofcourse the show did not harp on it again & again. What was the point of this 18 min video!!!! Was it just to add to the speculations already on the internet!!!! The fact that no one was ready to take up the responsibility was also there but under played. I am glad the content maker chose to trust the intelligence of the viewer instead of trying to preach or propogate. I don't think the makers needed to depend on trolls to promote the show. The powerful starcast was enough to generate curiosity and draw the audience... in my opinion.
it's a disgrace that film tries to twist facts to blame someone else, for propaganda purpose, on a topic like this. What can be more shameful than this ? I stopped watching what these people make in 1990s based what happened in Mumbai and that's best decision I made.
When a Super power with all the technological might couldn't prevent 9/11, how can you expect India to do have prevented Hijack those days. If anything Indian Govt of those days should be praised for bringing back all the hostages alive. Their primary motive was the safety of passengers rather than showing bravado. It was a learning experience for countries all over the world regarding the security at the Airports.
What’s the fuss about ic814? I just know that LKA narrowly missed becoming PM of India and pakistan. Though he tried earnestly. That’s why he was the first one to enter the bjp mdm.
अरे भाई अनुभव सिन्हा के दो मकसद हो सकते हैं: 1. आई एस आई से पैसा लेकर फिल्म बनाना और उसको बेकसुर बताना। 2. फिल्म को हिट करने के लिए ये सब करना ताकि खुब पैसा कमाया जा सके। घटिया किस्म के लोग ये हटकंदे अपनाते हैं। इसलिए लोगों को इस फिल्म को नहीं देखना चाहिए।
Hello Mr Journalist. The code names were the ones used by the terrorists. Also, Mr Journalist, ISI was implicated by the spy officer in Nepal. Only you think it was shown to be ISI had nothing to do. Just don't waste airtime.
Shame on the Producer, Director, Actors and Promoters - the series humanising the hijackers, tries to absolve them... Woke Anubhav Sinha works with a fixed mind-set... Never to be watched. ever. The Censor board also needs to be asked, why did they allow the series to be released?
All know that it’s supported by ISI. Also our security lapse. Then couldn’t act on it properly when it was in India. Shame on our history. Political failure as well
अनुभव सिन्हा की फ़िल्मों में पैसा ही अंडरवर्ल्ड और आईएसई का लगता है तो उसी के अनुसार लिपपोटी तो करेंगे
Series based on past events should be evaluated primarily on factual grounds rather than through the lens of contemporary perspectives, which are often influenced by hyper-nationalism. This black-and-white approach hinders our understanding of complex realities.
The series' portrayal of terrorists using code names like 'Doctor,' 'Bhola,' 'Burger,' and 'Shankar' aligns with documented facts, reportedly listed on a government website, possibly the Ministry of External Affairs.
While I found the series to be decent, it didn't reach the quality of 'Patal Lok' or 'Family Man.' The hype surrounding it was excessive.
Veer Sanghvi's article in The Print highlights several instances where the series failed to accurately depict the involvement of the ISI.
Given these factors, it's essential to understand the filmmakers' research methods and how Anubhav chose to portray the real-life experiences of the hostages. While creative liberties are acceptable, it's crucial to avoid distorting facts. The disappointment expressed by Mr. Sharma, the chief steward, suggests that the series may have been rushed and lacked sufficient research
Only one big mistake was there Brijesh mishra prime minister principle sactary who didn’t dicide the action
Yes it’s true but also shameful
@@jaspalsingh2075 not sure if he had the authority to decide, I think best decision was taken under the circumstances as in the exchange which took place
If it was isi,what general vp malik do
Filmmaker wanted a controversy..😂😂😂 for publicity..
@@biswajitbordoloi8092
Real footage shows. Ajit doval with female official,,there is no female representation in web series
We require Modi Ji for next 15 years,a strong govt and strong PM very very important
Both are Practical & Magician Power to Full Common People 😅
Fact that Indian public,s weakness must be counted,relatives of hostages demonstrations r also responsible for govt action at that time.
Total shame for series makers,anti India sows must be banned, govt has to be Stern on safety of the nation
i feel very very disappointed with anubhav sinha..
Ohh you said Sinha was playing foul? Dang it… Print is ‘canceled’ now 😂
I am very surprised at this piece by Print. Does not seem like Shanker and/or his team has seen the show. I think last episode talks about ISI having planned and aided. Ofcourse the show did not harp on it again & again. What was the point of this 18 min video!!!! Was it just to add to the speculations already on the internet!!!! The fact that no one was ready to take up the responsibility was also there but under played. I am glad the content maker chose to trust the intelligence of the viewer instead of trying to preach or propogate. I don't think the makers needed to depend on trolls to promote the show. The powerful starcast was enough to generate curiosity and draw the audience... in my opinion.
कारगिल में जो हुआ उसका फ़्रस्टेशन था मुशरफ़ का
अब हम क्या कहें आडवाणी जी के बयान का आई एस आइ का था पाकिस्तान का पूरा कामथा। फिर फिर क्या उखाड़ लिया पाकिस्तान का। ऐ चारों नेता बकवास थे।
लीपा पॉटी तो करता ही है अनुभव सिन्हा
it's a disgrace that film tries to twist facts to blame someone else, for propaganda purpose, on a topic like this. What can be more shameful than this ? I stopped watching what these people make in 1990s based what happened in Mumbai and that's best decision I made.
When a Super power with all the technological might couldn't prevent 9/11, how can you expect India to do have prevented Hijack those days.
If anything Indian Govt of those days should be praised for bringing back all the hostages alive. Their primary motive was the safety of passengers rather than showing bravado.
It was a learning experience for countries all over the world regarding the security at the Airports.
What’s the fuss about ic814? I just know that LKA narrowly missed becoming PM of India and pakistan. Though he tried earnestly. That’s why he was the first one to enter the bjp mdm.
Hizack Hizack 😅😅
Aaj ke din Modi sahab jo Rahul ke demands ko importance de rahe hai, woh bhi ek galti hi hai
अरे भाई अनुभव सिन्हा के दो मकसद हो सकते हैं:
1. आई एस आई से पैसा लेकर फिल्म बनाना और उसको बेकसुर बताना।
2. फिल्म को हिट करने के लिए ये सब करना ताकि खुब पैसा कमाया जा सके।
घटिया किस्म के लोग ये हटकंदे अपनाते हैं। इसलिए लोगों को इस फिल्म को नहीं देखना चाहिए।
What is your opinion is not clear. You only relayed what everyone knows. Is Anibhav Sinha right or wrong was not discussed at all
Film maker wanted controversy..
Hello Mr Journalist. The code names were the ones used by the terrorists. Also, Mr Journalist, ISI was implicated by the spy officer in Nepal. Only you think it was shown to be ISI had nothing to do. Just don't waste airtime.
Next time come prepared. Aaaa...aaaa....aaaa.... Seems that u r prepared.
Shame on the Producer, Director, Actors and Promoters - the series humanising the hijackers, tries to absolve them... Woke Anubhav Sinha works with a fixed mind-set... Never to be watched. ever. The Censor board also needs to be asked, why did they allow the series to be released?