Told you bro, Usyk is just better, he had a better amateur career and accomplished more than Fury. I had it 116-112 for Usyk. Usyk just dominated him the whole fight AGAIN, but Fury did show he did improve. Hats off to Fury but wave them to Usyk!
116-112 is not crazy at all. Even 117-111. Cleaner more effective work and consistently pushed him back. Purely on volume you have to favour usyk in all the close rounds. Outlanded fury in 10 rounds. Competitive in spurts from fury but very Clear winner. Same as last time.
Thank God I didn't PAY to watch that fight! I don't give a damn what the judges scored, I would call it 0 - 0 because it was absolutely a SNOOZE FEST! I'm 64 years old, been a boxing fan since I was 13 and I think these two fighting for the Lineal Heavyweight Championship is a sad state of affairs for the division. Neither of these guys' names belong in the same SENTENCE with Champions (and a LOT of contenders) of past eras, like Ali, Foreman, Holmes, Lewis, Louis, Liston, or even contenders like Earnie Shavers, Gerry Cooney or Jerry Quarry. SMH
Usyk is the clear winner, anyone who don't know nothing about boxing can decide, its just clear, fury was getting beat and usyk was not getting beat, winner always walks forward and that's what usyk was doing the whole fight
I had it 116-112 for Usyk. You're obviously biased because you "were really hoping that fury would get his belts back", so there is the problem. And clearly, he did win more than 7 rounds, all 3 judges gave him 8, so yea...good luck with your boxing analysis career.
I already implied in the video that I was a bit biased. But to note, it’s funny how the people who bash judges for getting decisions wrong all the time are the same ones saying “see, judges scored it that way too so I must be right!”
@ so the fact that you are biased makes your scoring a lot less credible. First how did you know that I bash the judges? And do they really get the decisions wrong All The Time? Or do they mostly get it right (a lot more often than not). You need to work on your logic.
@@BigDonchrare that all 3 judges get the same score if its wrong. Normally one anomaly. If all 3 agree its much more plausible that it was a legit score.
@@Dimka2012Bo if my video was titled “Fury was robbed” then you’d have a point. But my video was just a recap of the fight with 5% of it talking about my thoughts on the decision.
Told you bro, Usyk is just better, he had a better amateur career and accomplished more than Fury. I had it 116-112 for Usyk. Usyk just dominated him the whole fight AGAIN, but Fury did show he did improve. Hats off to Fury but wave them to Usyk!
Nope.
@ Yes
Usyk stayed one step ahead...
Well, Donch. What can we do about it? 😔
116-112 is not crazy at all. Even 117-111. Cleaner more effective work and consistently pushed him back. Purely on volume you have to favour usyk in all the close rounds. Outlanded fury in 10 rounds. Competitive in spurts from fury but very Clear winner. Same as last time.
Oleksandr Usyk vs Daniel Dubois Next Please!
Thank God I didn't PAY to watch that fight! I don't give a damn what the judges scored, I would call it 0 - 0 because it was absolutely a SNOOZE FEST! I'm 64 years old, been a boxing fan since I was 13 and I think these two fighting for the Lineal Heavyweight Championship is a sad state of affairs for the division. Neither of these guys' names belong in the same SENTENCE with Champions (and a LOT of contenders) of past eras, like Ali, Foreman, Holmes, Lewis, Louis, Liston, or even contenders like Earnie Shavers, Gerry Cooney or Jerry Quarry. SMH
Usyk is the clear winner, anyone who don't know nothing about boxing can decide, its just clear, fury was getting beat and usyk was not getting beat, winner always walks forward and that's what usyk was doing the whole fight
I had it 116-112 for Usyk. You're obviously biased because you "were really hoping that fury would get his belts back", so there is the problem. And clearly, he did win more than 7 rounds, all 3 judges gave him 8, so yea...good luck with your boxing analysis career.
I already implied in the video that I was a bit biased. But to note, it’s funny how the people who bash judges for getting decisions wrong all the time are the same ones saying “see, judges scored it that way too so I must be right!”
@ so the fact that you are biased makes your scoring a lot less credible. First how did you know that I bash the judges? And do they really get the decisions wrong All The Time? Or do they mostly get it right (a lot more often than not). You need to work on your logic.
@@BigDonchrare that all 3 judges get the same score if its wrong. Normally one anomaly. If all 3 agree its much more plausible that it was a legit score.
@@Dimka2012Bo if my video was titled “Fury was robbed” then you’d have a point. But my video was just a recap of the fight with 5% of it talking about my thoughts on the decision.