What happened before the Big Bang?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 мар 2020
  • Understanding how the universe began has been a goal for scientists, philosophers, and theologians for millennia. In this video, Fermilab’s Dr. Don Lincoln describes the scientific view on this topic. He covers what we know, what we think, and what we may forever never know.
    To learn more visit:
    fnal.gov
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 11 тыс.

  • @emeraldaisle2927
    @emeraldaisle2927 Год назад +37

    The best science quote ever ( 02:42 ), "...That should impress the heck out of you. It still blows my mind, and it's what I do everyday...." - Dr. Don Lincoln

  • @hzk1234
    @hzk1234 4 года назад +1051

    "It's not a sin to not know something. It's only a sin to think you do when you clearly don't"
    - Dr. Don Lincoln

    • @spiralsun1
      @spiralsun1 4 года назад +9

      Chesky Stern it might also be a sin to say that we don’t know something when we clearly do! We do know what existed before or outside spacetime. You will see what I mean if you stop trying to make your way back to the beginning from within spacetime -when we know that the natural laws break down! Seriously that’s just being stupid. You can take yourself out of the universe one way. By finding the one solid thing that must have existed forever. Probability or probabilities. I explain the implications of this one foundation of reality in my video where I look hideous but Looks aren’t everything 😆🤷‍♀️
      People are so sure that they don’t know but that’s patently ridiculous because you can take the whole universe as an experimental result in a way- and then we DO KNOW that there was the probability of the universe existing. We know that and that’s huge. Probability is prime. It exists without the universe. The implications of that are staggering. I explain in my video. Incidentally I am a scientist in the top 1% of IQ and I have thought about this one thing my whole life. I am not being contentious, flippant, or cute. I discuss these things with Nobel Prizewinners. He’s just wrong.
      ruclips.net/video/wDiEMCPM7KA/видео.html

    • @pradeljames3260
      @pradeljames3260 4 года назад +27

      @@BadBoiFX let her express her opinions. You don't hold her mind and her conciousness. Why don't you just respect different people's views. Don't be an asshole, we're all Humans. Everybody has the right to express themselves.

    • @timeless_realm
      @timeless_realm 4 года назад +10

      @@BadBoiFX and, likewise, no one asked for your comment.

    • @StoryGordon
      @StoryGordon 4 года назад +9

      Misconceptions aren't sins.

    • @wanaraz
      @wanaraz 4 года назад +15

      @@spiralsun1 BS nonsense!

  • @lubimenergetiky8131
    @lubimenergetiky8131 Год назад +64

    Finally a good science channel with 0 clickbait. Great job, please stay awesome.

    • @02markcal
      @02markcal Год назад +5

      I agree just pure science without the hype.

    • @steveshadforth8792
      @steveshadforth8792 11 месяцев назад

      Unlike that Bint hoffennhuer

    • @kilosolutions
      @kilosolutions 11 месяцев назад

      and it's not for the lack of opportunity. 11:10 proves me right.

    • @RD-kz4wr
      @RD-kz4wr 11 месяцев назад

      Great pure science up to 1x10-43 seconds. During this point he throws out the most obvious point and provides 3 explanations even more radical. Physics 'breaking down' is not the most obvious explanation. You can't explain physics if what you use to calculate it doesn't exist yet. Einstein's theory perfectly predicts that space, time, and matter are interdependent. That's the 'physics' relationship we have. It's pretty obvious if you don't have one you don't have any. The most logical explanation is that there was nothing as we know it. No time, matter, or space. His concept of multiple universes is also most logical mathematically, but does not need to intercept with ours.

    • @FurryFoxFren
      @FurryFoxFren 7 месяцев назад +1

      Well, it's not like they need to be misleading. They are a real science lab (I can confirm, I have family members working there) that actually works with these things.

  • @hansruiter-jo4ke
    @hansruiter-jo4ke 2 месяца назад +1

    I have seen several of your videos and its always a joy to watch.
    You make the hard to understand much more understandable and even more interesting.
    Thanks for that.

  • @benjaminrobles3825
    @benjaminrobles3825 3 года назад +202

    I love how he does this so we can learn and not the money cause he has no ads

    • @z_boozebag
      @z_boozebag 3 года назад +8

      same mans a hero

    • @jacksonlarson6099
      @jacksonlarson6099 3 года назад +3

      I would imagine he already has a decent amount of money in the bank.

    • @BradWatsonMiami
      @BradWatsonMiami 3 года назад +1

      == The Conglomerate - Universe Creation Theory (combining GOD/Nature, Ancient Religions, Astronomy, Cosmology, Laws of Physics, General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Chaos Theory, Laws of Biology & Chemistry, Linguistics, Mysticism, and Philosophy))
      "'Energy is neither created or destroyed in an isolated system'. 'The BIG Bang-Bit Bang' inflation/expansion of energy and information into the void 13.8 billion years ago was a supermassive white hole spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our 'parent universe'. This duality combines general relativity’s singularities of infinite density in ‘Cosmic Egg hatchings’ of all universes within 'The Conglomerate': multiverse without random bubble universes and parallel worlds. 'In the beginning' the Planck density of the core of a SBH is a birth canal..‘Quantum bounce SBH-SWH seed transitions’ are ‘quantum tunneling umbilical wormholes’ with energy-matter and data transformed/transferred, albeit scrambled and encoded. Our Universe is 1-in-2 trillion 'self-similar offspring' each with the same inherited physical laws (‘DNA’). This ubiquitous cause-and-effect 'circle of life cycle': birth-life-death-transformation-rebirth explains infinite space and eternity - a necessity. Reproduction is GOD/Nature’s simple plan for greatly spreading life for everything from cells to universes."
      Why does this Universe exist? Because it's our playground (god + run = ground).
      - Seal #1a of the 7seals.blogspot.com

      This has triggered The Apocalypse/Revelation which is not the ‘end of the world‘ - it‘s the 2nd Coming (E=mc²).

    • @timguan5353
      @timguan5353 3 года назад +2

      yep I definitely appreciate that

    • @BradWatsonMiami
      @BradWatsonMiami 3 года назад +1

      == The Conglomerate of Universes - Universe Creation Theory ==
      combining GOD/Nature, GOD=7_4 or Fod=6_4 theory, ancient religions, astronomy, cosmology, fined-tuned laws of physics/general relativity/quantum mechanics, chaos theory/fractals, laws of biology & chemistry, linguistics/code-breaking, programming the Universe, mysticism, and philosophy/anthropic principle

      "Energy can’t be created or destroyed, only transformed/transferred in an isolated system." General relativity allows black holes, white holes and Big Bang.

      ‘The BIG Bang-Bit Bang’ inflation/expansion of energy₇₄ and information into the void 13.8 billion years ago was a supermassive white hole spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our ‘parent₇₄ universe’. This duality combines general relativity’s singularities of infinite density breaking through spacetime in ‘Cosmic Egg hatchings’ of all created universes within ‘The Conglomerate’: multiverse with no random quantum fluctuation bubble universes, no parallel universes or parallel worlds, and no universes with different physical laws. Our Universe is 1-in-2 trillion ‘self-similar offspring’ each with the same inherited ‘DNA’.

      “In the beginning”, the Planck density of the core of a SBH is a birth canal. ‘Quantum bounce SBH-SWH seed transitions’ are ‘quantum tunneling umbilical wormholes’ with energy-matter and data transformed/transferred, albeit scrambled and encoded. The ubiquitous cause-and-effect ‘circle of life cycle’: birth-life-death-transformation-rebirth explains infinite space and eternity - a necessity. Reproduction is GOD/Nature’s plan for greatly spreading life from cells to universes. GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4 is the #1 program₇₄/law/initial₇₄ condition (GOD704.fandom.com ).

      Why does this Universe exist? It’s our playground (god + run = ground₆₄).

      - Seal #1a of the 7seals.blogspot.com . Only the returned Christ & Albert Einstein reincarnated could produce this - it's triggered The Apocalypse/ Revelation which is NOT the 'end of the world'. COVID-19 is part of Seal #4: S=19 (18.6) Theory.

  • @spudhead169
    @spudhead169 4 года назад +315

    Don, the only complaint I have about your videos is a very serious one and it's something you should seriously consider. There's not enough of them.

    • @ajcook7777
      @ajcook7777 4 года назад +7

      Not trying to be rude or offend whatsoever with this comment:
      Alot of good knowledge and content but I have a hard time getting over all those forced hand gestures. It's quite easy to tell when someone constantly overuses them, in this case, they became very distracting when they were added in randomly and at will, they just didn't match the script...looked very unnatural...

    • @TheCarpenterUnion
      @TheCarpenterUnion 4 года назад +6

      @@ajcook7777 I think he oversimplifies things a bit for me..
      The hand gestures are a good facet to presentation.

    • @Elrog3
      @Elrog3 4 года назад +2

      I'm just glad he doesn't misrepresent science like so many other channels out there.

    • @Pravinkumar-zv7ww
      @Pravinkumar-zv7ww 4 года назад +1

      Can someone give the content of this video in a short note.

    • @samsum3738
      @samsum3738 4 года назад

      @@Pravinkumar-zv7ww yes

  • @madisonnapolitano7531
    @madisonnapolitano7531 7 месяцев назад +6

    Amazing! This was such a consumable video! So reasonably timed, and well explained. Very, very fascinating!

  • @timmonapier8832
    @timmonapier8832 Год назад +4

    I haven't heard that put so simply and clearly before. Thank you! Dr Lincoln

  • @D.NogueraMusic
    @D.NogueraMusic 4 года назад +1195

    "It's better to have questions you can't answer, than having answers you can't question"
    Edit:
    Quote from Richard Feyman, according to many commenters below.

    • @kleinbot
      @kleinbot 4 года назад +24

      42

    • @MikeStoddart
      @MikeStoddart 4 года назад +55

      Science vs Religion?

    • @D.NogueraMusic
      @D.NogueraMusic 4 года назад +91

      @@MikeStoddart it doesnt have to be a versus. Science, philosophy and religion can become dogmatic for the people who can't admit "I don't know."

    • @lucidstate4664
      @lucidstate4664 4 года назад +3

      Moron!

    • @Peter_Scheen
      @Peter_Scheen 4 года назад +40

      @@D.NogueraMusic It goes even further. For many the "I do not know" is not an option. When you say to a creationist that you do not have an answer to a certain question they consider your whole argument invalid.
      Example, Evolution, tons of evidence but we do not know how Abiogenesis exactly works. Therefor, Evolution is rejected.

  • @videos4mydad
    @videos4mydad 4 года назад +242

    My absolute favorite part of the video is the repetition of how "we dont know" and that it is far better to admit the truth than to arrogantly proclaim something without evidence. Love it! There is no shame in not knowing - that's what science is all about!

    • @RME76048
      @RME76048 4 года назад +29

      "... it is far better to admit the truth than to arrogantly proclaim something without evidence." Please tell that to Fox "News." And the President.

    • @cosmodeus1720
      @cosmodeus1720 4 года назад +7

      ". . .arrogantly proclaim something without evidence."
      This is what annoys the hell out of me about Brian Cox and Michio Kaku.

    • @dunruden9720
      @dunruden9720 4 года назад +3

      @@RME76048 Quote, "I know this, and I'm a smart guy!" Sheesh!!

    • @Mellownius
      @Mellownius 4 года назад +1

      Pretty cool since he’s a pretty chill dude ... don’t mind learning from him a little science if he can dig a little faith ... never know , he could learn a thing or two even though I’m pretty sure he’s much smarter than your average bear 😎

    • @lrvogt1257
      @lrvogt1257 4 года назад +5

      CosmoDeus Are they claiming they know something they don’t know or something YOU don’t know... or are they saying things for which there is evidence and suggesting hypothesis. what have they said is certainly factual that is not?

  • @UltimaGaina
    @UltimaGaina Год назад +2

    This voice felt so familiar after listening to "The Theory of Everything" on Audible! Checking the professor's name both here and there clarified that it was not just a coincidence, but I never pictured the mustache. 😁 Great lectures!

  • @stephenlouden480
    @stephenlouden480 2 года назад +6

    amazing explanations on mind boggling theories. thank you. I started learning and don't intend to stop. ive always wanted to learn about this stuff. , physics and chemistry so that when someone asks me what i know i can finally say I know about .. literally..everything. 🤓

    • @foobarmaximus3506
      @foobarmaximus3506 Год назад

      lol

    • @foobarmaximus3506
      @foobarmaximus3506 Год назад

      Learn to capitalize first. Then learn about other stuff.

    • @valinorean4816
      @valinorean4816 Год назад

      mmm... how does mind work, exactly? how to make a sentient creature? we don't know that, yet

  • @scarbo22
    @scarbo22 4 года назад +261

    So nice to hear a lecture without background music. Thank you.

    • @peaceman269
      @peaceman269 3 года назад +7

      Yes I agree ditch the music - it's noise and doesn't help

    • @chucktooley4553
      @chucktooley4553 3 года назад +5

      Same as with porn! A refreshing change, thank you Fermilab. 🖖🏼

    • @keyboardevangelist8956
      @keyboardevangelist8956 3 года назад

      The good news has once again come to you today. You can inherit the kingdom of God even if you are a sinner.. after all we are all sinners in God's standards of justice and holyness (he says that if a man looks at a woman with lust he has already committed adulterly with her in his heart NO MAN IS THAT PURE😅).....All you have to do is to honestly humbly pray repent turn away from sins (read the10 commandments) and trust that Jesus for his love❤❤ for you he left his throne in heaven and came to the world he was humbled humiliated betrayed beaten and killed for your sake to pay the fine of your sins and mine so that we won't spend our eternity in hell but with him in heaven...this might be the last time you read the gospel...Look around🔥🔥 be smart..the end is nigh🔥 ..He is coming back soooon not as the sacrificed lamb of God🐑..but as King of Kings🤴 the judge of the whole world..Your soul is on the line😭😭. Eternity is a long time.

    • @BradWatsonMiami
      @BradWatsonMiami 3 года назад

      == The Conglomerate of Universes - Universe Creation Theory ==
      combining GOD/Nature, GOD=7_4 or Fod=6_4 theory, ancient religions, astronomy, cosmology, fined-tuned laws of physics/general relativity/quantum mechanics, chaos theory/fractals, laws of biology & chemistry, linguistics/code-breaking, programming the Universe, mysticism, and philosophy

      "Energy can’t be created or destroyed, only transformed/transferred in an isolated system." General relativity allows black holes, white holes and Big Bang.

      ‘The BIG Bang-Bit Bang’ inflation/expansion of energy₇₄ and information into the void 13.8 billion years ago was a supermassive white hole spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our ‘parent₇₄ universe’. This duality combines general relativity’s singularities of infinite density breaking through spacetime in ‘Cosmic Egg hatchings’ of all created universes within ‘The Conglomerate’: multiverse with no random quantum fluctuation bubble universes, no parallel worlds, and no universes with different physical laws. Our Universe is 1-in-2 trillion ‘self-similar offspring’ each with the same inherited ‘DNA’.

      “In the beginning”, the Planck density of the core of a SBH is a birth canal. ‘Quantum bounce SBH-SWH seed transitions’ are ‘quantum tunneling umbilical wormholes’ with energy-matter and data transformed/transferred, albeit scrambled and encoded. The ubiquitous cause-and-effect ‘circle of life cycle’: birth-life-death-transformation-rebirth explains infinite space and eternity - a necessity. Reproduction is GOD/Nature’s plan for greatly spreading life from cells to universes. GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4 is the #1 program₇₄/law/initial₇₄ condition (GOD704.fandom.com ).

      Why does this Universe exist? It’s our playground (god + run = ground₆₄).

      - Seal #1a of the 7seals.blogspot.com . Only the returned Christ & Albert Einstein reincarnated could produce this - it's triggered The Apocalypse/ Revelation which is NOT the 'end of the world'. COVID-19 is part of Seal #4: S=19 (18.6) Theory. It‘s the 2nd Coming (E=mc²).

    • @bigjapko3139
      @bigjapko3139 3 года назад

      lecture WITH background music is a show, not lecture.

  • @aa-to6ws
    @aa-to6ws 4 года назад +237

    "But before that, the universe was way hotter"
    Weren't we all?

    • @motog4221
      @motog4221 4 года назад +11

      Hotter than that archer? I struggle to envisage such heat.

    • @davidm5707
      @davidm5707 4 года назад +2

      @@motog4221 He means when we were younger, as well.

    • @motog4221
      @motog4221 4 года назад +2

      @@davidm5707 and I mean that archer was hawt. Kazowie!

    • @Simon.the.Likeable
      @Simon.the.Likeable 4 года назад +3

      May have been hotter but certainly lacking the complexity and depth which develop with curated aging.

    • @roddymcape7697
      @roddymcape7697 4 года назад +2

      I always thought what happened before the Big Bang was Two and a Half Men, both created by the same producer....😁😁😁😁😷😷😷😷😷

  • @4apca
    @4apca Год назад +2

    Thank you Dr Lincoln for another exceptional piece.

  • @umangupasham9589
    @umangupasham9589 2 года назад

    Dr. Don Lincoln, this by far the best video I have ever seen on the big bang theory & quite opening when you mentioned that we do not know what was universe like at time = zero & I guess 10th -43 secs.

  • @hermeticxhaote4723
    @hermeticxhaote4723 3 года назад +96

    "For all we know, there are still things we don't."
    There will never be a time in human history where this isn't true.

    • @michealtaylor7745
      @michealtaylor7745 3 года назад +3

      Yes we will. Tomorrow. Two mnths after your comment. We still don't know all shit.

    • @srobertweiser
      @srobertweiser 3 года назад +4

      What I don’t know could fill Soldier Field.

    • @andrewferg8737
      @andrewferg8737 3 года назад +1

      But we do know that all physical states are derived from previous states. And we do know of another class of object not requiring an initial state.

    • @mitchellc4
      @mitchellc4 3 года назад

      The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
      Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21
      Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
      John 17
      3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.

    • @Kiros37100
      @Kiros37100 3 года назад +6

      @@mitchellc4 Why are you quoting entirely unrelated fiction books under a video about science?

  • @Festerbestertester6
    @Festerbestertester6 3 года назад +33

    I really appreciate that he's able to say "we don't know". It gives "us" (these geniuses) something to work on.

    • @frankcabanski9409
      @frankcabanski9409 3 года назад +2

      Him: "I don;t know. Therefore, I'm right." Nope.

    • @mitchellc4
      @mitchellc4 3 года назад

      The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
      Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21
      Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
      John 17
      3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.

    • @shermie_65
      @shermie_65 3 года назад +1

      @@mitchellc4 nope genius, thats not it...

  • @gorber1971
    @gorber1971 Год назад +1

    I love that you use 'Centigrade'. I still do it, but then change it to 'Celsius' because I don't think anybody will know what I'm talking about nowadays.

  • @lethalrancher
    @lethalrancher 2 года назад

    Great video….I did in fact learn from it…thnx for sharing….

  • @friedpicklezzz
    @friedpicklezzz 3 года назад +383

    A HUGE compliment to the presenter and people involved creating this video. It’s not easy to explain difficult things in an easy way. Not only that, the tempo and depth is just right, there’s no distracting music and the length of the video is just perfect.
    Looking forward learning more.

    • @mitchellc4
      @mitchellc4 3 года назад +4

      The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
      Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21
      Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
      John 17
      3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.

    • @Takeabowson1986
      @Takeabowson1986 3 года назад +18

      @@mitchellc4 do you have evidence that any of this actually happened?

    • @intlvoiceofreason9239
      @intlvoiceofreason9239 3 года назад +7

      @@mitchellc4 Yikes!!

    • @lederereddy
      @lederereddy 3 года назад +1

      @Jeroen De Cloe
      "It's not easy to explain difficult things in an easy way."
      That's true when someone's just trying to explain something difficult.
      Like a rocket engineer trying to explain how all the many facets involved in the mechanics of a rocket work together to produce a rocket that does what it's designed to do.
      That would be very difficult to explain in an easy way.
      But Dr Logan, I think it was, he's trying to explain the impossible.
      There is no scientific method in his description. There's no science that could reveal anything about what happened before creation came into being.
      And the big bang model defies the laws of physics, logic, the scientific method and common sense.
      Apparently, this fantasy club actually believe they represent Christ.
      Far from it. Christ taught us to trust God's word. Not change it, amend it, manipulate it, to conform with the secular ideologies of big bangs, billions of years, evolution, etc.
      When, and for how long the creation event took is clearly written in the book of Genesis, and specifically, the King James version.
      What God's word teaches is clear.
      The only question is do you believe God's word or man's best guesses?
      Because this guy is not teaching science aka observed, tested, repeatable knowledge.
      He's choosing what seems most reasonable, and aligns best with the modern secular concessions.
      Literally, you have to presume the big bang happened before compiling various theories about when and how it happened, what was happening prior to it, what caused it, etc.
      Without your initial assumption that it happened, there is nothing to extrapolate upon.
      That means it's all fantasy.
      So, you tell me... What, exactly, have you actually learned from examining a long list of previous fantasies?
      And if you're a Christian, believe Christ. He created the world as is, in six days, approximately 6000 years ago.
      Personally, I chose to believe God's word... At least until it can be proven wrong.
      And His word, as always, has proven to be, by far, the most scientifically sustainable model of the universe's origin and creation.
      No model that begins with "billions of years ago" stands up to objective scrutiny.
      Just the observation of the many clues just inside this solar system defy and debunk that model...
      Dinosaur fossils, and fossils in general, have been proven to be but a few thousand years old, by numerous examples of the actual application of the scientific method.
      Evolutionists have only one good reason to deny science every time it defies evolution. They prefer to believe there is no Creator.
      But Christians don't have any good reason to deny both God and science.
      Peer pressure is not a good reason, btw.
      Leave God out of it and just stand by the actual unbiased, objective, tested and repeated observable facts.
      Bio matter has a half-life of about 520 years, tops. Period. End of discussion.
      Rescuing devises are not how science moves forward.
      The bible, ancient textual human history, archeology, fossils, and the objectivity of the scientific method, just to name a few, all favor God's word, at all times, and in all things.
      But Christians need to learn to trust God...
      At least until His word has been demonstrably proven wrong.
      If anyone could have done that, there would be no bible.
      It's loaded from top to bottom, side to side, cover to cover with specific people, places, things, times, dates, prophecies, world renowned events, and more...
      If it was all made up, it would be the easiest thing in the world to debunk.

    • @Mozart1220
      @Mozart1220 3 года назад +8

      @@mitchellc4 And yet there is no credible evidence backing that up. God is a MYTH, and the entire story of "jesus" is taken from several earlier "pagan" religions.

  • @JMichael2x2
    @JMichael2x2 4 года назад +235

    Ironically he gets my attention when he says, “there are some things we don’t know.” That’s probably the most accurate statement in his discussion!

    • @slavaserbie9155
      @slavaserbie9155 4 года назад +3

      Yes!!!!

    • @jamescaban7710
      @jamescaban7710 4 года назад +14

      It's more like we know 1% of 100 but we say we got half of it figured out and they call that a theory and then supposedly use the scientific method... if you have 1% of knowledge in a subject no matter what you think you still don't know Jack schitt...

    • @lightningbrigade4722
      @lightningbrigade4722 4 года назад +3

      Awesome comment

    • @YTho-ev1ej
      @YTho-ev1ej 4 года назад +16

      @@jamescaban7710 what we know, we know, what we don't, we don't. Not really sure how you can fault him for that. He is providing the only knowledge humans have been able to obtain about our universe and its existence so far.

    • @JMichael2x2
      @JMichael2x2 4 года назад +6

      Y. Tho - I’m not criticising him, what I said was true. I just think it’s more interesting when scientists talk about what they don’t know, since that’s when the juices of our imagination and innovation explode discovering. Also, when you understand what we don’t know, it’s pretty boring when a scientist starts telling you with great confidence what happened before the Big Bang.

  • @anthonyat2401
    @anthonyat2401 Год назад +2

    Another excellent presentation by Dr Don.

  • @moragosullivan5166
    @moragosullivan5166 Год назад

    I know none of the math, but I love all of the information. Fascinating. I listen to every o e of these. My mind constantly thinks about all of the information. Thank You.

  • @MshadowsenseoC
    @MshadowsenseoC 4 года назад +118

    I respect the fact that you won't lie about y'all not knowing.

    • @KrustyKlown
      @KrustyKlown 4 года назад +21

      there already are far too many people with sacred books full of lies of knowledge

    • @kennethhicks2113
      @kennethhicks2113 4 года назад +3

      Yes, something that should be taught in all disciplines starting in grade school.

    • @KrustyKlown
      @KrustyKlown 4 года назад +13

      @Mike Doonsebury There a difference between Knowledge, Belief, Scientific Hypothesis, and a Scientific Theory. If you understood the difference, you wouldn't have posted your comment.
      Far too many people think a scientific hypothesis when stated, is something that scientists know to be true, or are asserting to be true. No, it's only a possibility they have reason to believe MAY be true, and do not have any verifiable evidence for it yet.

    • @eatersofdead
      @eatersofdead 4 года назад +3

      @@KrustyKlown What you just stated is the Definition of a Theory. This guy in this video is stating as fact. That is falsifying evidence, in the name of Consensus Science. To me looses all credibility. Even with a Dr. at the beginning of his name.

    • @mattweston1212
      @mattweston1212 4 года назад +9

      @@eatersofdead found someone who doesn't know the difference between theory as used colloquially and theory used in a scientific context. Shocker.

  • @ricardocastillo5485
    @ricardocastillo5485 4 года назад +145

    What happened before the big bang, the short version:
    "Dunno".

    • @seelenwinter6662
      @seelenwinter6662 4 года назад +8

      the only thing they know is, that they know nothing...

    • @RockinLoud360
      @RockinLoud360 4 года назад +2

      PARTICLES!
      they did the smashing thing, very hot mmm spicy, then boom big expansion

    • @waynebow-gu7wr
      @waynebow-gu7wr 4 года назад +9

      Michio Kaku is working on a theory that our big bang was caused by another universe.??? How much more BS do they think we are going to take.

    • @hunk2140
      @hunk2140 4 года назад +2

      this has been answered in 2019 paper by Neurokinetikz..I Dunno why these scientists keep persisting on WE DUNNO..
      it's simple..dig in and get enlightened..
      Theoretical Implications
      Either the universe has the properties of a hologram.
      Or the hologram has the properties of a universe.
      What is the Universe?
      The universe is a black hole. And every black hole is a universe.
      The big bang is the collapse of our black hole into a singularity, creating a universe in its interior.
      The universe is a black hole contained in a parent universe with the same laws of physics and other black holes.
      The 7th dimension of string theory is the plane of possible universes with the same laws of physics but different initial conditions.

    • @OdinzEinherjar
      @OdinzEinherjar 4 года назад

      Thanks, just as i suspected.

  • @excidedous
    @excidedous Год назад +3

    It only took less than 15 minutes to say "I don't know" pffftt...

  • @paulyadav2288
    @paulyadav2288 2 года назад +1

    Thank you for your honesty!

  • @MrBrandx8106
    @MrBrandx8106 3 года назад +962

    Lol my son asked me this question. I said "The Big Date".

    • @jeremiahb3421
      @jeremiahb3421 3 года назад +33

      Ahhh haha I saw what you did, good job there I saw what you did 😂

    • @Morrodin182
      @Morrodin182 3 года назад +65

      If he ever asks what will happen after you can say, most likely The Big Breakup :p

    • @besto5486
      @besto5486 3 года назад +22

      @@Morrodin182 and then the great depression state

    • @dylantrost4471
      @dylantrost4471 2 года назад +14

      @@Morrodin182 what a lame joke

    • @Morrodin182
      @Morrodin182 2 года назад +52

      ​@@dylantrost4471 The joke is less lame than your comment though, so I guess you are the whiner eh winner >.>

  • @meranism673
    @meranism673 4 года назад +7

    For me this is the best channel on RUclips to learn things about physics. Thanks for these valuable contents !

  • @daleandrews3552
    @daleandrews3552 Год назад

    I'm a fairly intelligent person holding bachelor degrees in biology (with a minor in chemistry), medical technology, and nursing, in that order. I'm a retired R.N. about 10 years now. In all that schooling, I thereby have an almost total science background. Out of all that science, I've only had 2 courses in physics that didn't require calculus. Those 2 courses would be Physical Chemistry, which are the booger bears of physics courses! I guess that explains why I was only able to fully comprehend his concepts. I really need to go back and watch the video again to try to comprehend those parts that went over my head! To be honest, I was humbled by this presentation. I rarely run across anything I read or see that goes completely over my head. 🤔

    • @panzerblitz2140
      @panzerblitz2140 Год назад

      It goes over your head because it's complete 🐂 It's intended to be incomprehensible so you will buy into their religious dogma and they can get more funding.

  • @stephken8077
    @stephken8077 Год назад

    Fantastic post, thank you.

  • @alencosic3765
    @alencosic3765 4 года назад +60

    "I's not a sin to not know something, it's only a sin to think you do when you clearly don't." Well said Dr. Lincoln

    • @mattpotter8725
      @mattpotter8725 4 года назад +3

      Someone tell this to Trump pleases!!!

    • @daieast6305
      @daieast6305 4 года назад

      no such thing as a sin...science tends to learn most from its mistakes... and who the hay is doctor lincoln?

    • @daieast6305
      @daieast6305 4 года назад +1

      @@mattpotter8725 that is below my pay grade

    • @alencosic3765
      @alencosic3765 4 года назад +2

      @@daieast6305 The word "sin" here is meant more like a "mistake", he used it just to piss on religions. You don't know who doc is, really? Google him

    • @mattpotter8725
      @mattpotter8725 4 года назад

      @@daieast6305 It's below everybody's pay grade, but I still wish someone would tell him, but then he thinks he knows everything better than everybody else. Maybe only his own daughter could tell him, he seems to listen to her.

  • @craiggrocott7559
    @craiggrocott7559 4 года назад +72

    “I would rather have questions that can’t be answered than answers that can’t be questioned”.

    • @spyeatte
      @spyeatte 3 года назад +1

      @Larry Chappell The elephant in the room is that before the big bang there was nothing (no time, no space, no mass, no energy). Genesis 1:1 - In the beginning God created... The physical laws of time and space, and the relationship of mass and energy, and all atomic values defined in the first microsecond. Since God created them he operated outside those parameters and is in no way limited by them in any way. So what was before the big bang we can never know...until we die and then it won't matter.
      Apparently the universe is a one-time event. It was created, will exist for a period of time (approximately 145 billion years) then the "Big Rip" will end it all with all mass reduced to sub-atomic particles and be rolled up like a scroll.

    • @moderntechnology7010
      @moderntechnology7010 3 года назад

      tru

    • @vercingetorix3414
      @vercingetorix3414 3 года назад

      @@spyeatte So Genesis is your science textbook?
      The flood
      Tower of Babel
      Adam and Eve
      Talking serpents
      The Nephili
      The children of God mating with the daughters of men
      etc.
      Are part of your science curriculum?

    • @karnobot9814
      @karnobot9814 3 года назад +1

      @@spyeatte here is why religion is so toxic to people. They think Pretending to know the unknown is knowing and make unsubstantiated claims is virtuous as long as its made in the name of diety and religion

    • @MC-ur6qv
      @MC-ur6qv 3 года назад +1

      @@karnobot9814 Yep. They try to explain stuff that can be explained with science, given time, with some crazy idea of an all powerful being creating everything and when they’re is a legit good point against religion they point to faith

  • @bigredracingdog466
    @bigredracingdog466 Год назад

    7:41 "It's not a sin to not know something; it's only a sin to think you do when you clearly don't."
    That quote alone was worth the price of admission.

  • @melissagregory-oc5jq
    @melissagregory-oc5jq Год назад

    Thank you for this show!

  • @bandotasif
    @bandotasif 4 года назад +81

    I love how Dr. Lincoln explains these things. The available information is very well presented. If he was my teacher when I was much younger I almost certainly would have gone into theoretical physics, the wonderment of science. Amazing.

    • @gernothartung
      @gernothartung 4 года назад +3

      word

    • @herrschmidt5477
      @herrschmidt5477 4 года назад +4

      He never explain anything really in detail. Most of the time it's "we know this and that"

    • @SEVideoQuant
      @SEVideoQuant 4 года назад +11

      Herr Schmidt Maybe because he must summarize in 20 Minutes a 7000 pages textbook...?

    • @herrschmidt5477
      @herrschmidt5477 4 года назад +2

      @@SEVideoQuant no he must not^^

    • @SEVideoQuant
      @SEVideoQuant 4 года назад +1

      Herr Schmidt LoL

  • @Romogi
    @Romogi 3 года назад +71

    'I will never lie to you'. Humility is a requirement for good science.

    • @paulweeldreyer7457
      @paulweeldreyer7457 3 года назад +5

      And desperately lacking today. Just look at how the lab leak hypothesis was treated (lied about).

    • @michaelbee2165
      @michaelbee2165 2 года назад

      @@HamhocksUnlimited It's not any different from Mengele actually.

    • @maryjane1085
      @maryjane1085 2 года назад

      It's usually something that is often said by liars actually - otherwise why would they feel the need to say it - other than to reassure the gullible...

    • @1970Phoenix
      @1970Phoenix 2 года назад +3

      @@HamhocksUnlimited I'm trying to work out if you are a troll or just uneducated (I suspect its the latter).
      Its perfectly reasonable and entirely honest to say there exists a consensus if indeed a consensus does exist. There are many scientific explanations for which there is indisputably a consensus. Biological evolution and the Big Bang are two such examples. It may be that you personally don't like those explanations because (perhaps) they conflict with your preferred religious narrative, but it is demonstrably true that they represent the scientific consensus on those issues.

    • @cindysantillan5278
      @cindysantillan5278 2 года назад

      November yeah

  • @alexfedorov1071
    @alexfedorov1071 Год назад +1

    Thank you )) I learned a few things from this video and my day is not waisted 😀

    • @-_-THINK-_-
      @-_-THINK-_- Год назад

      Did you know God created the world?
      Did you also know a guy named Georges Lemaître, (1894-1966), Belgian cosmologist, Catholic priest came up with the idea of a big bang theory?
      The definition of ( theory ) is-
      a supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, especially one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained.
      "Darwin's theory of evolution is also just and idea some man had.
      In the 1920's is when the idea happen, and it's weird because he was a priest and if he read the Bible it says on the first page God created the world. Unless he didn't really believe the Bible and is one of the people the Bible talks about being a wolf in sheep's clothing deceiving people and causing confusion.
      Most people don't believe the Bible because they say it was written by man and it's wrong but instead some go and believe in nothing or in evolution and the big bang or both those together without the thought of God creating the world...
      Did you know the Bible says there's a number for man and it's the same number as the beast and the number is 666? How did someone thousands of years ago know that the number of man was 666 without DNA testing or the technology you'd need to know that? Because humans have carbon-12 in them which is made up of 6 protons 6 electrons and 6 neutrons and also Jesus and Lucifer where referred to as stars in the Bible and stars too also have carbon-12. How can they possibly know this information unless they where given the knowledge.
      But with all the confusion and lies in the world through time people lost the truth. Now we have people believing in other man's words about life and creation of earth and humans when they truly don't know and the Bible is the answer to those questions without a doubt if you are wide enough to understand what it says which everyone should because God is not the author of confusion...
      We all need to put are faith and trust back into God and his only begotten son Jesus Christ.
      For God so loved the world he gave his only begotten son that whosoever believeth on him will not perish but have everlasting life
      He died on the cross and rose again to save us all from sin cause by the devil.
      Peace and love to everyone who reads this.
      JESUS IS THE WAY THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE NO ONE CAN GET TO THE FATHER BUT BY HIM.

    • @shanebailey9128
      @shanebailey9128 2 месяца назад

      But Not how to spell!

  • @phyllis9750
    @phyllis9750 Год назад +1

    Thank heavens that your son is thinking about this! We need him😉

  • @astrodude7306
    @astrodude7306 4 года назад +10

    I teach astronomy and this still blows my mind

  • @ccchhhrrriiisss100
    @ccchhhrrriiisss100 4 года назад +14

    When I was a kid, one of my classmates used to argue that our universe (and its expansion) is simply the other side of some other parallel universe's black hole. We debated and argued over this idea throughout the fifth grade.

    • @YCCCm7
      @YCCCm7 4 года назад +3

      As the saying goes: "If you can't show it, you don't know it." I will admit I've had the same idea myself, and it's a fun one, but there's problems about the questions of energy quantity and why black holes don't seem to lose any coherent level of mass, although the search for Hawking radiation is still on.

    • @thomasmaughan4798
      @thomasmaughan4798 4 года назад +1

      Janet Jeppsen (Mrs Isaac Asimov) wrote a novel about that very idea. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janet_Asimov "The Last Immortal" (1980) (as J. O. Jeppson)

    • @shaunhumphreys6714
      @shaunhumphreys6714 4 года назад +3

      that's the holographic principle, based on information thought to be imprinted on a black hole's event horizon, which was established as the solution to the information paradox by stephen hawking i think. Then speculation arose that the same thing could apply to our whole universe, all the universe as information imprinted on a two dimensional hologram, either encircling our universe or imprinted on a black hole's event horizon. This encouraged further speculation taking the idea to its most extreme conclusion-the simulation hypothesis. Holographic principle though merely speculative is way more sensible than the latter. But that's only relatively speaking.
      They are both fringe ideas. Indeed two experiments have been done to test for the holographic principle, one was to test for the equivalent of pixels in the structure of space-time. If this is holographic, then space will be pixelated. However so far no pixelation has been found. Another experiment, this one non lab based, used telescopes to measure the journey of different types of electromagnetic waves, specifically if space-time is not a smooth membrane like medium, then Fermi's LAT would have detected a significant time lag between the arrival of the lowest-energy and highest-energy gamma rays. In fact, to within one part in 100 million billion, the two photons traveled at the same speed. Many approaches to new theories of gravity picture space-time as having a shifting, frothy structure at physical scales trillions of times smaller than an electron. Some models predict that the foamy aspect of space-time will cause higher-energy gamma rays to move slightly more slowly than photons at lower energy.
      Such a model would violate Einstein's edict that all electromagnetic radiation -- radio waves, infrared, visible light, X-rays and gamma rays -- travels through a vacuum at the same speed.
      Fermi showed that pixelation or rough 'texture' in space-time may not exist at all. So far the smoothness of the space-time continuum has been confirmed. So that's NO to the holographic principle or simulation hypothesis. It confirms the aether/vacuum conventional idea, supported by Einstein and his predecessors which describes spacetime as euclidean.
      However all this fringe speculation, especially occupying populist 'science' circles, started with the information paradox black hole problem, which I'm not satisfied is solved, and I don't even think it's that great a problem-energy can't be created or destroyed, information can't be lost. These rules may not apply in extreme situations e.g. at the high energy and temperatures just after time equals zero st the big bang our laws of physics did not apply. And similarly things break down in black holes-which are the most extreme predictions derived from General relativity's mathematics-all the tensor and vector calculus. the schwarzschild metric and the kerr metric describes the physics of black holes, and it's pretty crazy,the maths says in a kerr black hole you can visit your own past. Black holes spin space and time. All real black holes are spinning black holes. The angular momentum of the star thay collapsed, plus the material the black hole devows, even at a quantum level, the angular momentum of every fermion and boson means black holes always rotate. A paper in the astrophysical journal detailed how gamma ray bursts seem to produce superluminal motion, with superluminal gamma waves being time reversed.. gamma ray burst only happen in very extreme cosmological events and therefore are another example of where our laws of physics may break down to produce faster than light travel through space under that unique condition. iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ab3bdf

    • @TotalGAMIX
      @TotalGAMIX 3 года назад

      It doesn't make sense cause what would've caused that universe. And then that universe and then that and then that and then that universe. There must be a beginning

    • @briandolan2224
      @briandolan2224 Год назад +1

      Pretty cool dialog for 5th graders! In 5th grade I spent most of my time avoiding cooties and trying to figure out why those creatures called girls were starting to be interesting!

  • @rickbear7249
    @rickbear7249 Год назад +1

    It would be wonderful if you would take the time to create a video explaining what is meant by 10 to the minus whatever in easy to understand terms. You have a wonderful skill at making these complex physics ideas intelligible. Just that you're relying upon mathematics that needs similar very approachable explanations, for people to follow your other wonderful explanations.
    I used to understand this stuff (many years ago) while others who don't have a scientific/mathematics/engineering background would really benefit, and you'd be far more successful in enlightening us all.
    Thank you, Rick

    • @isaac1572
      @isaac1572 Год назад

      Agreed , just state it in years and lightyears.

    • @montagdp
      @montagdp Год назад +1

      10^-N means a number less than 1 with N-1 zeros after the decimal. For example, 10^-3 = 0.001. It's the same as saying 1/10^3 or 1/1000.

    • @zigamuswizard9731
      @zigamuswizard9731 Год назад +1

      Scientists claim that the formation of the bulk of the universe happened all at once, from a small size to vast in ONE SECOND! The numbers they are saying are for the tiniest fractions of a second where everything was getting bigger. They claim that they can get into the last 1/6th (about) of that first second, but they can't go any further back toward actual 0.

  • @patkovskyi
    @patkovskyi Год назад

    If time is relative to the observer/frame of reference, how can we talk about "seconds" after Big Bang? What reference frame is this?

  • @badcamred8824
    @badcamred8824 3 года назад +68

    Just want to say, I appreciate that there are men and women out there like Dr. Lincoln who are dedicating their lives to unraveling life's greatest mystery.

    • @jonb6417
      @jonb6417 3 года назад +8

      ... and wasting their time fabricating theories.

    • @Ryan-eu3kp
      @Ryan-eu3kp 3 года назад +10

      @@jonb6417 you are clueless

    • @mitchellc4
      @mitchellc4 3 года назад +1

      The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
      Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21
      Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
      John 17
      3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.

    • @Ryan-eu3kp
      @Ryan-eu3kp 3 года назад +6

      @@mitchellc4 Koo Koo!!! 🤣

    • @shermie_65
      @shermie_65 3 года назад +5

      @@mitchellc4 nope, thats not it...

  • @Manguadesignz
    @Manguadesignz 3 года назад +52

    Subbed simply because i genuinely learned with no ads

  • @ejgoldguru
    @ejgoldguru Год назад

    i wish i'd had an instructor like you when i was an undergrad -- at 81 and very published, i still know nothing.

  • @damaddog8065
    @damaddog8065 Год назад +1

    Nice work.

  • @Kastor774
    @Kastor774 4 года назад +43

    Optimists: The glass is half full
    Pessimists: The glass is half empty
    Dr. Lincoln: Suppose you have a container that had both air and water

  • @jameslai6879
    @jameslai6879 4 года назад +121

    “I will never lie to you,” said on April 1st.

    • @c.augustin
      @c.augustin 4 года назад +12

      Nope, was uploaded on 2020-03-31.

    • @VanBurenOfficial
      @VanBurenOfficial 4 года назад +3

      @@c.augustin G O T T E M🥇💯🆒️

    • @c.augustin
      @c.augustin 4 года назад +1

      @@VanBurenOfficial Ah, well, I forgot the ;-) - I was only half serious ;-)

    • @williesmith9832
      @williesmith9832 4 года назад +1

      Still, a great comment 😅

    • @DDKKAY
      @DDKKAY 4 года назад +3

      @@c.augustin but the comment is in 1st of April so the comment itself is a lie..😁😁

  • @mozzy76
    @mozzy76 3 месяца назад

    amazing and top notch clear explanation, thanks!

  • @regfries8279
    @regfries8279 Год назад

    Absolutely fascinating. I don’t have a science background, so I’m sorry if this is a dumb question.
    If the known laws of physics didn’t exist between t=0 and t=10^-43 seconds, how do we know what time itself was like during that interval? In the timeline this video is based upon, couldn’t time itself have been elastic or even completely indefinable during that period?

    • @drsatan3231
      @drsatan3231 Год назад

      That was the inflation epoch. The laws of physics we have now didn't exist back then. There was only the inflation quantum field at that point. The four fundamental forces were created as the inflation quantum field decayed after the inflation epoch ended

  • @ThuyTran-ci2et
    @ThuyTran-ci2et 2 года назад +8

    This is such a great video explaining very complex ideas to the general public. Thank you ! I just subscribed based on the quality of this vid.

  • @Galacoo
    @Galacoo 3 года назад +270

    "i was a cute baby" nice try, we all know you were born 54

    • @blackscreennoiseforrelaxat1517
      @blackscreennoiseforrelaxat1517 3 года назад +10

      @MesohornyMeloveulongtime idk but man I can’t stop laughing

    • @JamesBond-ml3zp
      @JamesBond-ml3zp 3 года назад +2

      @@blackscreennoiseforrelaxat1517 Boy this guy got Game!! He's probably got Tons of Women, waiting outside his Tent on the Sidewalk!!

    • @BradWatsonMiami
      @BradWatsonMiami 3 года назад +1

      == The Conglomerate of Universes - Universe Creation Theory ==
      combining GOD/Nature, GOD=7_4 or Fod=6_4 theory, ancient religions, astronomy, cosmology, fined-tuned laws of physics/general relativity/quantum mechanics, chaos theory/fractals, laws of biology & chemistry, linguistics/code-breaking, programming the Universe, mysticism, and philosophy

      "Energy can’t be created or destroyed, only transformed/transferred in an isolated system." General relativity allows black holes, white holes and Big Bang.

      ‘The BIG Bang-Bit Bang’ inflation/expansion of energy₇₄ and information into the void 13.8 billion years ago was a supermassive white hole spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our ‘parent₇₄ universe’. This duality combines general relativity’s singularities of infinite density breaking through spacetime in ‘Cosmic Egg hatchings’ of all created universes within ‘The Conglomerate’: multiverse with no random quantum fluctuation bubble universes, no parallel worlds, and no universes with different physical laws. Our Universe is 1-in-2 trillion ‘self-similar offspring’ each with the same inherited ‘DNA’.

      “In the beginning”, the Planck density of the core of a SBH is a birth canal. ‘Quantum bounce SBH-SWH seed transitions’ are ‘quantum tunneling umbilical wormholes’ with energy-matter and data transformed/transferred, albeit scrambled and encoded. The ubiquitous cause-and-effect ‘circle of life cycle’: birth-life-death-transformation-rebirth explains infinite space and eternity - a necessity. Reproduction is GOD/Nature’s plan for greatly spreading life from cells to universes. GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4 is the #1 program₇₄/law/initial₇₄ condition (GOD704.fandom.com ).

      Why does this Universe exist? It’s our playground (god + run = ground₆₄).

      - Seal #1a of the 7seals.blogspot.com . Only the returned Christ & Albert Einstein reincarnated could produce this - it's triggered The Apocalypse/ Revelation which is NOT the 'end of the world'. COVID-19 is part of Seal #4: S=19 (18.6) Theory.

    • @jefflittle8913
      @jefflittle8913 3 года назад

      54? I am not sure I get the reference. The opposite of 45?

    • @aaronbaddestqueen7713
      @aaronbaddestqueen7713 3 года назад

      Lmao

  • @FistandFootMartialArts
    @FistandFootMartialArts Год назад

    One thing I learned is that I have to watch that again, at least once. LOL
    Prolly more. ;-)

  • @wade5941
    @wade5941 Год назад

    I enjoy your presentation style. Too many get overly theatrical which detracts from the information.

  • @MillerFourFingers
    @MillerFourFingers 3 года назад +11

    When a scientist says "We don't know" respect goes up.

    • @davidwayne8336
      @davidwayne8336 3 года назад +2

      And when religious-ists claim they know something, the opposite happens.

    • @alexamaya3208
      @alexamaya3208 3 года назад +1

      @@davidwayne8336 Claiming to know the answer to something isn’t disreputable in and of itself. It’s the answer you seem to have a bias against, and therefore a hostility that lowers your respect for any theist. But there are perfectly reasonable reasons why we believe God caused the Big Bang, such as the first mover argument. Or the uncaused cause

    • @MC-ur6qv
      @MC-ur6qv 3 года назад

      @@alexamaya3208 Don’t take that guy as an example for all thiests. Believe it or not some of us think they’re may be something after death, we just don’t believe in a particular god.

    • @michaelbee2165
      @michaelbee2165 2 года назад +1

      @@davidwayne8336 But only from unbelievers. We can share the Gospel but only a fool says there is no God. That is from Psalms. And if we share, that person's salvation is not our responsibility. It is between that person and God, not between me and the unbeliever. So you see, I am commanded to share the gospel but not responsible. You are neither, but insist on demanding believers betray Jesus Christ. I pray you come to recognize His call.

    • @michaelbee2165
      @michaelbee2165 2 года назад

      @@alexamaya3208 Very well stated. Factual and reasonable.

  • @henrikpersson1962
    @henrikpersson1962 4 года назад +23

    I think all of this is confusing to me, still I'm watching it.

    • @BradWatsonMiami
      @BradWatsonMiami 3 года назад

      == The Conglomerate - Universe Creation Theory (combining GOD, General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, and Chaos Theory)
      "The BIG Bang-Bit Bang inflation/expansion of energy and information into the void 13.8 billion years ago was a supermassive white hole spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our 'parent universe'. This duality combines general relativity’s singularities of infinite density in a ‘Cosmic Egg’ birth of this and all universes within 'The Conglomerate': multiverse without random bubble universes and parallel worlds. Our Universe is inside the Planck density of that SBH and shares the same event horizon. That SBH-SWH seed phase transition was a 'quantum tunneling umbilical wormhole' with energy-matter and data transformed/transferred, albeit scrambled and encoded. Our Universe is 1-in-2 trillion 'self-similar offspring' each with the same inherited physical laws (‘DNA’). This simple cause-and-effect cycle/'circle of life' - birth-life-death-transformation-rebirth - explains both infinite space and eternity. Reproduction is GOD/Nature’s simplest plan for spreading life for everything from cells to universes." - Seal #1a of the 7seals.blogspot.com

      This has triggered The Apocalypse/Revelation which is not the ‘end of the world‘ - it‘s the 2nd Coming (E=mc²).

    • @pokerilaama8864
      @pokerilaama8864 3 года назад

      Me too.

  • @humbertothebeliever2443
    @humbertothebeliever2443 Год назад +5

    Before the mountains were born or you brought forth the whole world, from everlasting to everlasting you are God....Psalm 90 verse 2

  • @durga61
    @durga61 Год назад

    sir u r just an amazing and awesome explained of the toughest topics.u r funny and simply superb teacher.i love you.kerp doing this kind of interesting and knowkedgeble and mind blowing videos.

  • @prashantmishra1994
    @prashantmishra1994 2 года назад +25

    Hi Don! It was informative video for everyone.That's because,you explained to us in a clear and concise way.
    Thanks & regards.

    • @gtechnosinc2518
      @gtechnosinc2518 2 года назад

      yes, can you get something from nothing?try it, do your experiment idiot.

  • @marqgoldberg7454
    @marqgoldberg7454 2 года назад +22

    I may have to listen to this video 100 before I absorb all of its content. He communicates EXTREMEMY well; but single sentences often contain 3 or more complex ideas that have to be understood individually before connecting them together so as to grasp the meaning of the entire sentence. Each successive sentence then builds upon what preceded it. It's a struggle for me but an immensely rewarding one.

    • @johnjepsen4243
      @johnjepsen4243 Год назад

      It's science fiction. Bull feces.

    • @marqgoldberg7454
      @marqgoldberg7454 Год назад +1

      @@johnjepsen4243 do you believe Jesus magiced it up? I guess that's easier. But you never get to learn anything worthwhile.

    • @schechter01
      @schechter01 Год назад

      "extrememy"?

    • @daleandrews3552
      @daleandrews3552 Год назад

      Read my post above, Marq!

    • @charlesx593
      @charlesx593 Год назад

      @@Dawn-Songs Genesis tells us what happened science is trying to discover how it happened.

  • @pankkaj_IITB
    @pankkaj_IITB 10 месяцев назад

    one of the best videos i have seen.. i

  • @drijazdurrani
    @drijazdurrani 2 месяца назад

    Awesomely riveting Dr DON LINCOLN. Can't get better!!

  • @tedskins
    @tedskins 3 года назад +14

    These are the kind of videos you watch at 3 AM

    • @raditzsuper9782
      @raditzsuper9782 3 года назад

      lol 😂

    • @absolutelynothing3621
      @absolutelynothing3621 3 года назад

      I am watching at 730 am

    • @whambamcantacam1042
      @whambamcantacam1042 3 года назад

      1 am here

    • @mitchellc4
      @mitchellc4 3 года назад

      The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
      Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21
      Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
      John 17
      3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.

    • @absolutelynothing3621
      @absolutelynothing3621 3 года назад

      @@mitchellc4 what relevance does that have with what we were saying?

  • @aaronseet2738
    @aaronseet2738 4 года назад +55

    "It's a sin to think you do when you clearly don't."
    I see this sin committed all around me practically everyday.

    • @rhabdob3895
      @rhabdob3895 4 года назад

      Well at least it’s not adultery.

    • @larswadefalk6423
      @larswadefalk6423 4 года назад +7

      Definition of religion.

    • @6862ptc
      @6862ptc 4 года назад +2

      @@larswadefalk6423 Exactly, they think they know what can't be known. Then condemn science.

    • @jeromegoodwin3848
      @jeromegoodwin3848 4 года назад

      Sin merely means "Short Comings" so everyone has Sin.

    • @filiusvivam4315
      @filiusvivam4315 4 года назад

      @@6862ptc that's a false. stop being a bigot.

  • @richardlingo4055
    @richardlingo4055 2 года назад

    when I saw the title my first thought was There is no "before"

  • @4DRC_
    @4DRC_ Год назад

    Is getting data from before 10^-13 just a matter of building a bigger accelerator or is there some energy limit we cant cross?

  • @colebizwell5407
    @colebizwell5407 4 года назад +146

    "But that would be a lie, and I'll never lie to you"
    *sniff*
    *thanks don*

    • @Aurinkohirvi
      @Aurinkohirvi 4 года назад +4

      Next sentence: I think I can hear my lab calling.
      Yeah, do you, really?

    • @texasnewt
      @texasnewt 3 года назад +2

      Scientists are always truthful, never corrupted like, say global warming or the COVID-19 scamdemic, ...

    • @MC-ur6qv
      @MC-ur6qv 3 года назад +2

      @@texasnewt Global warming is real and so is Covid.

  • @another3997
    @another3997 2 года назад +60

    The problem is that we only have a small sample size, taken over a tiny period of time, and from one infinitesimally small spot in the universe. Our perspective is fixed, and we have to make many assumptions based only on the tiny snippets of information we can collect at that point. It's like sampling the air one inch above the ground outside your front door for a week, and then trying to describe the whole of the Earth's atmosphere in minute detail, just from those readings. Yet even with millions of weather measurements taken around the globe every day, dozens of weather satellites in orbit, and vast amounts of computing power running simulations, we still don't have the granularity to accurately predict the exact conditions at that one spot at any point in time. Now imagine this on a universal scale.

    • @lloydperry9227
      @lloydperry9227 Год назад +1

      And what if our assumptions are totally wrong?

    • @pauljack7170
      @pauljack7170 Год назад

      How true ! Humans are overfilled of fake certitudes

    • @TheHulabob
      @TheHulabob Год назад +1

      James Webb surprised everyone

    • @TheHulabob
      @TheHulabob Год назад

      The
      Big bang .was different when the deep infra red james webb telescope shook up the science tists when they did not see what they thought they should see

    • @TheHulabob
      @TheHulabob Год назад

      Holy moly there's hundreds of comments

  • @markhuebner7580
    @markhuebner7580 Год назад

    Very nice! Much more reality than I am used to seeing!

  • @carlcapello9956
    @carlcapello9956 Год назад

    I like these videos about the universe and what happened before the big bang and after the big bang. It is something that boggles the mind and mystifies the brain and to think who or what started this phenomenon and why. I think we are in the birth of time and need to learn so much more about this universe it will probably take more than a lifetime to learn all that the universe has to offer. We are probably looking at 1000's of years before we learn what we need to know about the universe.

    • @mysticwine
      @mysticwine Год назад

      Here's something to know about the universe: it's 90% invisible....just saying

  • @arthurhunt642
    @arthurhunt642 3 года назад +32

    This is absolutely the most interesting video I think I've seen on this subject. This is dealing with our universe. Heavy on the word "our".

    • @-f8884
      @-f8884 2 года назад +2

      You mean MY Universe. You exist in my Universe pal. You should be so lucky.

    • @Paul-hl8yg
      @Paul-hl8yg 2 года назад

      We ARE Universe!! 🇬🇧

  • @ozzyzee1770
    @ozzyzee1770 3 года назад +66

    What a pleasant, likeable chap. Very well explained

  • @markramsay6399
    @markramsay6399 Год назад

    Thanks, really interesting.

  • @user-pl7bz7jp2j
    @user-pl7bz7jp2j 3 месяца назад

    What struck me as odd that we talk about space expanding stretching curving, yet we talk about time as a constant dimension, not affected by space at all. How is that possible? Even around black holes where space curves time curves as well, so why would it be different for the big bang?

  • @muchtentoft
    @muchtentoft 4 года назад +243

    Spoiler: I don't know, you don't know, we don't know, and we'll probably never know

    • @olblu8746
      @olblu8746 3 года назад +27

      Thor L we'll know when we get to heaven, Jesus will show us.

    • @kinglui1257
      @kinglui1257 3 года назад +7

      We’re no suppose to know we gotta enjoy what we got

    • @voges1001
      @voges1001 3 года назад +1

      Edyon hahaha

    • @BradWatsonMiami
      @BradWatsonMiami 3 года назад +5

      == The Conglomerate - Universe Creation Theory (combining GOD, General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, and Chaos Theory)
      "The BIG Bang-Bit Bang inflation/expansion of energy and information into the void 13.8 billion years ago was a supermassive white hole spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our 'parent universe'. This duality combines general relativity’s singularities of infinite density in a ‘Cosmic Egg’ birth of this and all universes within 'The Conglomerate': multiverse without random bubble universes and parallel worlds. Our Universe is inside the Planck density of that SBH and shares the same event horizon. That SBH-SWH seed phase transition was a 'quantum tunneling umbilical wormhole' with energy-matter and data transformed/transferred, albeit scrambled and encoded. Our Universe is 1-in-2 trillion 'self-similar offspring' each with the same inherited physical laws (‘DNA’). This simple cause-and-effect cycle/'circle of life' - birth-life-death-transformation-rebirth - explains both infinite space and eternity. Reproduction is GOD/Nature’s simplest plan for spreading life for everything from cells to universes." - Seal #1a of the 7seals.blogspot.com

      This has triggered The Apocalypse/Revelation which is not the ‘end of the world‘ - it‘s the 2nd Coming (E=mc²).

    • @kinglui1257
      @kinglui1257 3 года назад

      zesty_sauce lol you can’t do nothing your dead lmaooo

  • @rage9715
    @rage9715 4 года назад +3

    Your content is easy to digest and gets me more interested in the topics kudos.

  • @mhansl
    @mhansl 3 месяца назад

    Accepting that we don’t know something is a talent any good scientist must possess.

  • @kensanity178
    @kensanity178 2 года назад +3

    In high school, I lit up a cherry bomb and heard a big bang. Then I joined the Army, went to Vietnam, and heard a really big bang. How big you talkin?

  • @Hajime319
    @Hajime319 4 года назад +128

    “You’re so hot even physics don’t apply to you

    • @ceelo826
      @ceelo826 4 года назад +7

      Underappreciated comment right here

    • @icetea52
      @icetea52 4 года назад +10

      Damn that's smooth.

    • @kallah4999
      @kallah4999 4 года назад +3

      Wow, thanks brah. I'm not gay though. Sorry, didn't mean to hurt your feelings buddy...

    • @gregandcindygingerich9615
      @gregandcindygingerich9615 4 года назад +2

      Well, since he’s speaking of a point in TIME at 10 to the -48 seconds, in other words pretty effing early in the history of the universe, I think it could also be said, “You’re so fresh the laws of physics don’t apply to you! “ Just another scientifically observed option...

    • @m.a2894
      @m.a2894 4 года назад +1

      Wait did Vsauce said that

  • @jamesdong8179
    @jamesdong8179 4 года назад +232

    video title: What happened before the Big Bang?
    me: well, obviously the Big Foreplay

    • @roddymcape7697
      @roddymcape7697 4 года назад

      Two and a Half Men before and Young Sheldon later....

    • @olivernald
      @olivernald 4 года назад +6

      Our universe on my wild guess was a product of a very large black hole which reach its maximum compression of singularity causing it to explode as the big bang.

    • @jamesdong8179
      @jamesdong8179 4 года назад +3

      @@olivernald I have a few black holes in mind. Some are a bit on the brown side though

    • @jaxxonbalboa3243
      @jaxxonbalboa3243 4 года назад +1

      There is no before...the BB is a perpetual. This means the entire universe is constantly recycling itself...it's a process machine.

    • @speedy-cc
      @speedy-cc 4 года назад +2

      El basho. best comment on utube. Legend 😅🤣

  • @florh
    @florh Год назад

    is there an actual difference between how much energy in temperature it takes for a phase transition to occur, or is energy energy for a possible phase transition? what if temperature came after cosmic inflation? I mean, there had to be some point where some energy was converted into fundamental particles for pressure, friction, anything that causes a shift in temperature, to occur?
    If the universe did exist as a zero point dimension with infinite density, how did it get hot in the first place for gravity to break symmetry, if there is a graviton. So this would suggest a time before our time? Then what before our time cause that zero dimension with infinite density to break symmetry and become a 3D environment?
    Cosmic inflation, I would ask, would this be where the gravity field gained its non-zero vacuum potential, like the higgs did after electroweak symmetry breaking? what if those gravitons are still flying at the speed you mentioned and the universe tries to catch up by expanding? or did I just describe dark energy? What if G.U.T. is incorrect, and all fields in QFT just emerged instead of some separated from a grand unified force? How would we be able to see evidence that even there was a grand unified force, or even electroweak force? if smashing lead together in a tunnel of just 27km doesn't cut it, how about a tunnel of 3500 km in the Kara- and Barendtsea, it looks undeep enough to make it float underwater? Or as Sabine Hossenfelder a while ago mentioned a 1500km long 600TeV particle collider in the gulf of Mexico, which is a lot deeper, but probably supported by landmass and some of it floating.
    What if there wasn't anything yet that could be considered matter in any way, when the universe started as a infinite zeropoint dimension with infinite energy instead of density? How can you compact energy, wouldn't it just all fit into a zeropoint dimension? Temperature came because of first interactions, all those zeropoint particles vibrating in such a small space, would heat up pretty quickly? That's why I'm a bit sceptic about the "hot dense soup of matter and energy" statements I hear quite often from other physicists. How do we know it was hot and dense in the first place? What made it hot and dense to start out from? Sorry, I watched some videos of Sir Roger Penrose, and that seems to be his favorite question to ask, "what caused it....". Just like with cosmic inflation, what force caused this was his question.
    Sorry to bombard you with questions again, but chat gpt is just no help at all. Without interactions, every single fundamental particle in the entire universe, could fit perfectly in a zeropoint dimension. Only, what would cause it for particles to start interacting, and which particles? Seems hard to believe that quarks were already determined to become quarks at T equals zero, right?

  • @omahanb1
    @omahanb1 Год назад

    We might not know but wow so close. I enjoy watching and speculating about .001 ; you bring it where I can imagine in my wonder. There could never be a negative .0 ?

  • @RonaldModesitt
    @RonaldModesitt 4 года назад +12

    Thank you for another great physics video! During most of your videos you are standing in front of a black board with all kinds of calculations, that really intrigue me. I know the black board is primarily for show. But, I wonder if you would consider discussing the black board and some of the equations that are pertinent?

    • @RonaldModesitt
      @RonaldModesitt 4 года назад +1

      @Slippery Storm Funny, Don doesn't look like one of those kind of guys!

    • @RonaldModesitt
      @RonaldModesitt 4 года назад +1

      @Slippery Storm Careful Slippery, you're gonna get us in trouble!

    • @TheFlyingBrain.
      @TheFlyingBrain. 2 года назад

      That would require imagining that the viewer is capable of thinking beyond the surface of things, and that is just something that isn't done in the case of videos like these. It's much easier to provide the appearance of teaching, than it is to actually TEACH.

  • @jimmycburfield5997
    @jimmycburfield5997 3 года назад +4

    Bringing the light of knowledge! Combing curiosity with scientific enquiry.
    Good stuff

  • @negativeman896
    @negativeman896 Год назад +1

    That's a very attractive archer in your video. The science stuff is pretty keen as well.

  • @YuSuck
    @YuSuck Год назад

    The universe never started and will never end. It’s just always been there.

  • @Iceman-xx1kh
    @Iceman-xx1kh 3 года назад +15

    Let's hope the James Webb can get safely up and bring sooo much more.

    • @mlmimichaellucasmontereyin6765
      @mlmimichaellucasmontereyin6765 3 года назад

      Yes!!! Now. I give 10:1 odds that the view is at least 10x "bigger" than before. Zo send me your bet & I will start an escrow account to cover it. O...BTW, there R so many shibboleths in this BS video that I will refuse to accept wagers from those of you who believe any of the absurdities claimed about all that BS about what exists beyond what real science can study (etc.).

  • @jimeldred772
    @jimeldred772 3 года назад +3

    I appreciate your honesty. I enjoy listening to your knowledge about our universe.

  • @greggweber9967
    @greggweber9967 Год назад

    Considering moving mass and energy, how fast was it moving?
    One mass is in free fall approaching a massive planet, therefore it is moving really fast. It passes another that is stationary on a tower. Is there any difference between the two?

  • @AvgDude
    @AvgDude Год назад +1

    Before the Big Bang, the concept of Before/After may not have even existed as we understand time passing.

  • @astroboy7712
    @astroboy7712 2 года назад +6

    Dr. Don Lincoln - Thank You!!!! I'm watching your Great Courses Series... I find it just awesome that folks like Dr. Don care enough to take the time to "translate" this cool knowledge and information to the proletarians... Sooo cool... I'm hooked... forget rock stars... and actors... Don is the real star!!! thanks!

  • @frequencymanipulator
    @frequencymanipulator 2 года назад +5

    A most splendid offering. The science explained in a calm and pragmatic manner. Thanks so much.

    • @michaelpalmer7954
      @michaelpalmer7954 Год назад +1

      "Thus saith God the LORD, he that created the heavens, and stretched them out; he that spread forth the earth, and that which cometh out of it; he that giveth breath unto the people upon it, and spirit to them that walk therein:" Isaiah 42:5 "Which commandeth the sun, and it riseth not; and sealeth up the stars.
      8 Which alone spreadeth out the heavens, and treadeth upon the waves of the sea.
      9 Which maketh Arcturus, Orion, and Pleiades, and the chambers of the south.
      10 Which doeth great things past finding out; yea, and wonders without number." Job 9:7-10 Also search; Isaiah 45:12: Isaiah 40:22: And John 1:1-5 "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
      2 The same was in the beginning with God.
      3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
      4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
      5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not." Also John 3:16-18

  • @richardsttati317
    @richardsttati317 11 месяцев назад

    Thank you for such fantastic information… and I pray 🤲 to God to give us a convincing answer while we are still alive…Amen

  • @michelebriere9569
    @michelebriere9569 Год назад

    I need a link to get that t-shirt.

  • @stankahuna5271
    @stankahuna5271 3 года назад +3

    I could listen to this guy all day, and I'm struggling to even understand half the stuff he is talking about, but that calm, collected, and intelligent, he's not lying to me, its the truth, so sad I have to come and listen to a physics lecture to find some truth in here

  • @pguti778
    @pguti778 4 года назад +12

    7:44 the best 10 seconds of a RUclips ever !!!!

  • @bustardrichard
    @bustardrichard 2 года назад +1

    On the smashing of 2 lead nuclei together
    What kind of thermometer did you, in fact, use to measure such tremnegous temperature golly

  • @slickstretch6391
    @slickstretch6391 Год назад

    If the universe was so small, what is the frame of reference for "small"? Small compared to what? What was around the "small" universe for it to expand into?

    • @peteconrad2077
      @peteconrad2077 Год назад

      It doesn’t expand into anything. It was small compared with its current size.