1) ur a genius this is the most concise MM video I've ever seen 2) If the animatronic is Shadow Freddy and not GoldenFreddy, that also ties in a HUGE ton to "Follow Me," what with Shadow Freddy being used to lure kids to William crime scenes. - Cori
Connie note: Thoughts on Elizabeth as the CouchPerson? It's a similar sprite to other Generic Children, matches the minimalist design of MustardMan, and she has a "higher standing" with William than Michael does, so she might think she can convince him to leave Mike alone, but "knows better" than to argue further. - Connie
@Dual-Process-Theory I think it’s unlikely because she’s like, 5. I really doubt William would let her be up at midnight especially since he’s already in a bad mood
It cant be Shadow Freddy. Whatever Shadow Freddy is, if its an agony creature, it most likely formed from the MCI rather than the Bite of 83. The Novel Trilogy has Shadow Freddy, where the Bite of 83 didnt happen but the MCI did happen.
Idk why people think Midnight Motorist is so confusing. Its just William Afton drunk driving home after killing Charlie at Freddy's, Mrs. Afton on the recliner watching TV, telling William to leave Michael alone, him banging the door and making threats, later going around the house to Michaels window (formerly Davids) where he sees Michaels footprints and a singular pair of animatronic footprints. Specifically, the animatronic footprints are Golden Freddy's, David Aftons footprints. Golden Freddy can teleport. It cant be some springlock scarecrow cuz those are animatronics and the suits are heavy to carry around. And it cant be Shadow Freddy because Shadow Freddy is an agony creature born from the MCI rather than the Bite of 83. Shadow Freddy appears in the novel trilogy, where the MCI did happen but the Bite of 83 didnt happen.
you're saying this as if it's confirmed. It's not. I believe that Michael is the couch potato and Dave is the runaway. you don't need to be so cocky to try and convince people.
9:20 It also doesn't make sense because, according to that one Steam post, only Nightmare BB is canon. Before we had nightmare gas and discs, the dreamer was very likely CC. If he *could not* have imagined Nightmarionne, then he likely *did not* see the Puppet in any form.
One thing I do wanna say I don’t think in the mound can be crying child’s grave for a couple reasons 1. Fnaf world update 2 has him have a proper gravestone 2. everyone knows he died. In the week before when the whole phone call happens. A employee tells the bully to get the child away from the bear and there are people also mad at them for doing that. And in into the pit the announcer states “Please do not shove anybody’s head in the animatronic’s mouth AGAIN” To add further to this Crying child, quite literally dies in a hospital. Nobody hates William at this point so imo Crying child would have a regular gravestone at the cemetery The mound/grave in my opinion, has to be Elizabeth’s Why 1. Nobody knows Elizabeth died. William covered everything up because of the gas leaks 2. Willam would’ve had to take Elizabeth’s body out at some point and he would’ve had to get rid of it somehow
Or maybe GF, possessed by his brother, shows up at Michael's house just like Susie in Coming Home. So night after night, Michael follows him to Freddy's to be with him. This would be a foreshadowing of Mike's motivations at Freddy's in FNaF 1.
Genuine LOL when you said "maybe we should ask why, but idk it's probably agony or something." I love (hate) how the games have given us some vague allusions to mechanics (what's remnant? Idk, read a book. But it does exist, I promise!), most of the names of characters, some important dates. But like, very little why, especially where William and his stand, SHADOW FREDDY are concerned. Ghost juice or reviving his son or he's a cold blooded murderer who does it for fun. Who knows, maybe he had prophetic visions that these kids HAVE to die to prevent the apocalypse! There's no in canon contradiction to this explanation! Edit: oh you don't like Dave as a name. Them's fighting words (nah. Believe what you want. I just can't be convinced his name is not Dave. Scott could say "the Crying Child's name is Jeremy." And I would immediately say "oh he retconned it. That's weird.")
*chefs kiss* I still think Michael worked at FNAF1 and possibly 2 under Williams control, like movie Vanessa, but that still fits But, if immortal and the restless is relatable for him that early, what if 'the baby' is charlie 'dont wake the baby' puppet? Movie Vanessa did know if wills crimes
Yeah I actually put this in the video (although it was after the audio and it just popped up on screen so I don’t blame anyone for not noticing), I think it could be a connection but I’m not sure
Here are a couple of things to think about. In sister location we learned some things about Michael Afton, such as he became a purple guy, he was not always purple, his "death" turned him purple, and then there is a scene where he states that the animatronics thought he was his father, which I believe that was meant to be after he turned purple, so they were not simply confused for being his father due to his genetics, they are both dead but still moving. I believe the mustard man of midnight motorist is the father, William but at a time before he has died. As for when William died, I believe that would be what is shown in the Baby ending of FNAF World. I know people think that is Henrey, but I cannot recall why, but the guy there talks about having regrets about building Baby and then in the next game, Sister Location, Elizabeth says to her father William, "Didn't you make her just for me?" I think William took his own life after the death of his daughter by his own creation of Baby and then came back as the original purple guy.
Another thing that goes against Henrey being the one that dies at the end of FNAF World is how Henrey is the one that set up the Pizza Simulator game to burn all the animatronics and set the souls free...unless he is also a walking corpse.
I personally think the runaway is Crying Child. His change in behavior would be from the fear experiments William puts him through as a punishment for running off. He could’ve mistaken Shadow Freddy for Fredbear and maybe he went off to Freddy’s. I don’t think he was brought to Charlie’s body at all, be he was just looking for an escape from home. JR’s could be a restaurant with Henry as the green man considering Charlie was the only kid with a green wrist band, and he’d be keeping Afton out because they had some kind of falling out in their partnership. The mound could be just the evidence left over from Charlie’s murder, or a dig cite for one of the restaurants because there’s a clearing wear the mound is.
I don't think BVRunaway automatically means his fear has to originate from seeing Charlie's corpse. In the minigame, we have the couch person saying "he had a rough day," which would mean something happened to the runaway earlier that day. Under BVRunaway, I think this is referring to BV gaining his phobia earlier on in the day.
Nice video, I like the points you bring up and think this is very fitting for the narrative of the series. But, please speak up! I had to increase my volume to almost twice of what I usually listen to videos with. Your mixing is fine, maybe the background music could be a little quieter at times, but the video as a whole is just very quiet, that's my only critique.
Alright thanks, I will take this into account for future videos (except my next one because it’s already done lol, it’s basically a shitpost anyways). Although I’m gonna be real the music is actually really low, I’m pretty sure at one point the volume is at 1, it’s just really loud I guess. So I’ll be sure to increase the voiceover going forward 👍
Great theory man! You brought up really interesting plot points such as Shadow Freddy role in FNAF 6. My theory for Midnight Motorist is that Michael is the runaway, the foot prints is Golden Freddy and the couch person is Mrs.Afton. I always thought that the couch person looked to be grieving, which matches Mrs.Afton considering the events of the BITE83, Mrs.Afton would be protective of her other children. Michael for me, seems right to be the runaway. He would tend to lock himself in his room for his guilt. It doesn't really fit the Crying Child's personality for him to do that, even if something traumatized him so bad to be as he is in FNAF 4. I also think Michael actions here leads him to experience the FNAF 4 gameplay for the first time or maybe a second, aka the nightmare experiments. - "He will be sorry when he gets back." The foot prints could be either Shadow Freddy or Golden Freddy, it could be the Crying Child as Fredbear, then Michael either goes to Fredbear's again (which I think is the same place where Charlie dies) or maybe the mound of dirt. I liked how you connected the 7th grave in FNAF World's update 2, which is far away from the others and next to Fredbear. The mound of dirt could be Crying Child's grave. Also I believe JR's is just a bar btw lol
7:45 the only problem i could see is if shadow freddy takes form from the agony of the MCI instead of charlie's murder, but then again there was a fredbear/freddy animatronic walking around as we see in take cake to the children so im not sure
to be fair, in ucn one of nightmares voicelines is "i am your wickedness, made of flesh" which could indicate that he just took form from any horrible crime afton committed
I still believe in MM83. I just feel like the 87 dice is either saying Mike is Fritz or that It’s a coincidence and a fun nod to FNAF 1’s Custom Night Easter Egg. On the note, I feel like color connection is really sketchy and a bit convoluted because of how it’ll ignore the narrative and character traits in the lore. Mike being the Couch Person doesn’t make sense in my opinion because I don’t see William trusting Mike over everything else since William likes to be the one in control of things, especially with his own children. And I can’t see Mike defending his brother BEFORE FNAF 4 because that’ll put him in a punishment from William. So in my opinion, Mrs. Afton makes the most sense as Couch Potato because the person is actually defending their son AND William doesn’t do anything about the person at all and instead go abuse the kid. And the runaway seems to be more brave and it really doesn’t necessarily make sense that BV would have that character and see Charlie’s corpse like that- which kinda means that Scott retconned it. And yet people don’t really look that this view and insists on the simple part since BVRunaway was the first conclusion back in 2017. However, I agree with most of this video
Any theory that uses FNAF world as evidence is a good theory to me! I thought this was a really well done video -- well paced and efficient in information delivery~
I think the yellow guy is yellow because Sister Location showed another purple guy (Michael) so to not confuse the comunity, Scott made him yellow. Aslo the background is very dark, if he is yellow he could stand out. Yellow is also associated with him.
The idea that the mound is CC’s grave doesn’t work, at least if Midnight Motorist is the night of Charlie’s death. Your explanation that William wanted CC’s body to experiment on is the only explanation I’ve seen for this, but it only works if William already knows remnant exists, and if he knows (or at least thinks) that he can bring a person back to life. How would he find out about that? Most likely someone’s death. This early in the timeline, if it’s not CC (which under WillSpeaker it can’t be since he’s presumably alive when the dialogue is said) it’s either Mrs. Afton (if she’s the TV watcher it can’t be her) or Charlie (if the mound already exists and MM is Charlie’s death, it can’t be her). The only way WillSpeaker works under BV First is if Mrs. Afton is already dead, or William murders Charlie while CC’s in a coma, neither of which work under MikeRunaway (at least with the mound being CCs grave). Or he’s just saying stuff, but most parents don’t suddenly gain the delusion that they can learn necromancy because they lost a child, especially since William probably doesn’t care about his son as much as most parents and if he did try to bring CC back I think it would’ve been for science, not for love.
The runaway pretty much dies.😅 I learned from a MM video by Cosmo that Toy Chica the high school years, an intermission from UCN has a statement of a how she'll get her crush/Afton commited a crime that fits midnight motorist's gameplay pretty much flawlessly and has no bearing on a fazbear entertainment property/Pizzeria: 'I'll invite him over to my house, if he doesn't come, then I'll go to his house. If he doesn't open the door, then I'll find a window. Chimney is always an option.' this whole intermission is an account of all the murders Afton committed. So with this connecting to MM, I'd have to Say that this mini game is connected to fnaf 4's night 6 ending scene. If so it has some dark implications for UCN as a narrative game though.
I think mustard man is William, the runaway is Mike, couch person is Mrs afton, the mound is bvs grave I guess, the foot prints are golden Freddy, that place is fredbears, and it’s 1983 after Charlie’s death. I think that Mike sees Charlie’s body, and then hears rumors about the puppet moving around causing him to investigate (also golden Freddy causes him to investigate I call this spark Charlie alter m and spark victim alter m respectfully) and then Charlie (who saw Mike when she died, like from the puppet) calls out to him using the fnaf 2 dreams, showing him what happened, Mike doesn’t understand and goes to fnaf 2 to investigate, then Mike gets a good grasp on what’s going on, causing the immortal and the restless to happen, which pisses William off and he goes “ok fine I killed Charlie and crew now if you tell anyone I’ll kill you and your also my acomplice/servant now” and then fnaf 1 happens in 1989 which Mike works as a Williams spy.
The mound I don’t think can be bite victims grave because into the pit and the week before all confirmed, everyone knows he died and he dies in a hospital bed so he likely would’ve had an actual funeral/grave The grave there is meant to be hidden. I believe the Mound is Elizabeth.
I think there's one detail that debunks DCIMM: Midnight Motorist happens at midnight. We know The DCI happens during William's night shift because Save Them shows possessed animatronics moving around, which only happens from 12AM-6AM. If The DCI happens during William's dayshift, that would mean it happened at the very end of his shift & subsequently the beginning of Jeremy Fitzgerald's shift, meaning Jeremy would've come in to begin his night shift, saw the crime scene, and just didn't report anything. That's just ridiculous. So, it's safe to say The DCI happened when William had the night shift. Like I said earlier, MM happens at midnight, for obvious reasons. The beginning of William's night shift. Why would William come in, cause The DCI, and then just leave hours before his shift ends? Sure, it technically could happen like that, but why? It'd be much simpler, under this idea, to title the minigame "Morning Motorist" or something & just have it take place at 6AM, and literally nothing about the minigame itself would change. So, MM happening at midnight can really only mean it doesn't take place after The DCI. However, that doesn't mean we should ignore the 87 dice. That would be cherry-picking because of the Spring Bonnie antenna. Like, for example, if people can say the 87 dice is just a reference to how 87 is a FNaF-associated number, why can't I say the Spring Bonnie antenna is just a reference to an iconic FNaF character? Our only reasonable option at this point is to say William is fleeing some crime scene in 1987 that isn't The DCI. Is that Charlie's murder? That remains to be seen. I think it is, but FLaF has yet to finish giving us MM lore, so we'll see.
The DCI are kids that broke into the pizzeria. In the week before Ralph and the week before says kids Would break into Freddy’s to steal Fazbear memorabilia to prove their bravery. We see in save them the bodies are all over the place and blood splatters. Because the kids split up. The mini game is called “save them” Freddy could’ve saved them if he woke up just a little earlier. As for why it’s called “later that night” William likely just left the building early to take care of the bodies.
@@Browhatisyoudoing Who exactly the DCI kids are doesn't really matter. All that matters is that they're killed during William's night shift. We know Midnight Motorist takes place at midnight because it's in the name: "MIDNIGHT Motorist." William really has no reason to leave the building early, to his house of all places.
@@UnoriginalJokester I agree that the DCI were killed during William Night Shift however William does not follow the rules. He doesn’t follow the basic stuff a night guard is supposed to do. In fact in night 6 phone guy brings the idea up of leaving in the middle of the night showing it’s completely possible “ Listen j-just finish your shift it’s safer than trying to leave in the middle of the night” William would have likely had to leave early to get rid of DCI bodies. The bodies that we were not found but there was an investigation ( the police were able to track the kids disappearance back to Freddy’s Day 3 People start spreading rumors about the disappearance and how something similar happened beforehand Day 4 (police find Freddys is place the DCI kids seem to have gone to) Day 5 (Building is on lockdown and William quits because he doesn’t want the police to find out what he did. The police believe that it’s likely a previous employee is involved with the murder) Day 6 Building gets closed down police find the connection between golden Freddy suit and the killer We know phone guy doesn’t know the animatronics are possessed because of the week before where he genuinely believes what he saying
In my personal opinion here’s what I think Midnight motorist takes place in 1987 for a couple reasons 1. The dice. 2 mph 187 3. The different house. 4. A perfectly parallel Fnaf 2 where the minigames are about the 3 crimes William commit Charlie’s death The MCI The DCI . The orange guy is William (five laps at Freddy’s basically confirmed it) . The mini game takes place later after William commits the DCI as the description says “ Talk about a killer ride! This smooth cruiser is the perfect choice for anyone wanting to flee a crime scene win a race” . Jrs is what happened to Fredbears after it shut down it got turned into a bar this is shown in the silver eyes with Charlie stating that building was used as a bar for a short time “a dark bar with a country western band playing on the stage” (probably the mediocre melodies) . The reason jrs is important is because jrs/Fredbear is the Fnaf 6 location evidence for this is 1. The alley where Charlie dies looks exactly like the alley where the scrap animatronics are at 2. In the epilogues for tales of the pizza Plex there’s actually a safe room in the Fnaf 6 location 3. Rockstar Freddy is the mascot and has a purple hat and bowtie, which only Fred bear had before 4. In SB there’s arcade where the art shows Fredbear and spring Bonnie‘s ghost overtop a burning building. . William is likely not allowed because Of either two reasons 1. They want no association with the old creators of the diner 2. The green guy knows William Afton murdered the 5 children and wants nothing to do with him. Everyone knows William did the MCI they just can’t convict them because there was no bodies found . The mound is A grave as it stated to be one in one of the guides . The grave likely belongs to Elizabeth. It can’t be crying child for 2 reasons 1.everyone knows that he died. His death is public knowledge as confirmed by the week before and into the pits announcer 2. Crying child has no relevance in 6 story Elizabeth on the other hand no one was around to witness her death when William knows any he covered it up with the gas leaks . The house is different because William moved after 1983. It’s probably not in the neighborhood anymore because everyone knows William is a criminal . The person on the couch is Ms Afton. 1. If we look at the midnight motors house, there is no other car meaning that the person on the other couch uses William’s car 2. The person talks to William like they’re on the same level they tell them what to do 3. Into the pit game story parallels midnight motorist And there are only 3 family members in Oswald’s family Oswald’s mom Oswald’s dad Oswald for midnight motorist, it would be Mike’s mom Mike’s dad Mike . Mike is the runway no surprise there. 1. All the siblings are dead so, it kinda has to be him 2. Mike is shown to be a rebel . Mike is likely 16 or 17 since he’s shown to still be living with his parents . if the Oswald parallel is true the reason why William doesn’t want Mike to keep leaving the house and locked him in his room is because Mike witness William commit the MCI ( note: using parallel as a narrative thing not the game theory way into the pit is canon in my opinion. I’m saying the game has a deeper connection/repeat of events) . “That place again” would be the 1987 Freddys . the thing outside the window is likely there because Mike kept going back to that location so something followed him home . The animatronic outside Mike’s window I think could be W. foxy or Freddy (I am not exactly sure I thought golden Freddy was the most likely option, but it seems in the week before he has a vendetta against Mike) . “ He’ll be sorry when he gets back” I think can mean 2 things . Nightmare experiments. . Forces him to look at the location as Fritz Smith
also william might not be allowed in on Jr's because hes already drunk. If its a bar, its probably the same one he was at before going to murder charlie also idk about withered foxy or freddy being the animatronic outside of the window, if its in 87 then why not just golden or shadow freddy? that would be a more straight forward answer ithink
Am I the only one who has a bit of trouble keeping up with the narration when there's no space between sentences? It feels oddly similar to reading paragraph after paragraph without punctuation
Am i the only one personally upset that William is yellow for this one game? I know technically he is the Mustard Man when he's in his fursuit, but its something scott doesn't really do again.
I find it funny that Scott cawthon has stated Michael Afton is not the protagonist in FNAF 4, however nobody excepts that because there is multiple points of evidence pointing in favor of that fact and nothing pointing against it, I also prefer the interpretation of Mike is the FNAF 4 protagonist it's also more narratively satisfying.
Do you mean the character encyclopedia? That just says BV is the protagonist of FNaF 4, which is still true with Mike being the player. It also says “he faces nightmares in his bedroom but his *real* story is told in the minigames”, implying that the nightmares aren’t his story
@zetorocks811 that might be the interpretation but I believe Scott said it himself but I'm not 100% sure, I probably should have mentioned I heard this in another theory video once so any miscommunication was entirely my fault sorry about that.
@zetorocks811 however usually when someone says that a character is the protagonist they usually mean of the main part of the game which is the night sections not the mini games.
@ The Character Encyclopedia already gets objective information wrong and had to rely on Dawko for help so I wouldn’t worry too much about it either way
@@zetorocks811 fair enough, it has proven unreliable in some aspects so you are right, but if I am right it is actually kind of amusing you have to at least admit that.
Where did Glitchtrap get it's costume? If it is the mimic, then wouldn't it be weird for it to invent a whole new bunny costume? Wouldn't it make more sense if it was copying something that use to be real? Maybe in MM "later that night" refers to fruity maze, because they are both table cabinets. In fruiting maze, Afton is wearing some kind of spring bonnie costume and it might not be a springlock suit.
The most common theory I see if that the runaway is Crying Child, but I struggle with that for one reason: Crying Child doesn't lock himself in his room, he is locked in by someone else and he hates it. We literally end those minigames by banging on the door, trying to get out, until we collapse in exhaustion. Yellow Guy reacts to his door being locked as something that the runaway does regularly despite being told not to; that doesn't make sense for Crying Child, who desperately wants the door to be open. Even if, say, Michael was locking him in, and William didn't know that at first, it should be immediately obvious that this isn't something that the Crying Child likes or does intentionally.
In the FNaF 4 bedroom the doors are not able to close, that’s a huge part of the design. There’s no offical source that confirms this is Mike’s room but they do imply it’s the bite victim’s. Also whoever we play as in the game is could barely reach the door knob so it has to be a child and we know Mike is a teenager. The FNaF 4 bedroom was a response to crying child’s actions in midnight motorist. It starts with crying child following shadow freddy and ends with crying child defending against him (yes, nightmare is shadow Freddy).
Yeah, that's one of the biggest reasons as to why I can't vibe BVRunaway. He *hates* being locked in rooms (even his own). Also, if you believe WillPlush, BVRunaway makes even mess sense. First cutscene in FNAF 4 has Will as Psychic Friend Fredbear say "What did he do this time? He locked you in your again." which not tells us that not only is this a recurring thing with the brothers; but, William is more exasperated by it then anything. Come Midnight Motorist, the Runaway locking their door (again, a recurring thing with them) set William off. Like, REALLY SET HIM OFF to the point that he's yelled at his son through the door, banged on the door, went out of his way to try to make it in through the window, and promised that "he would be sorry when he got back", all with the terrifying implication that he was going to get violent. This doesn't sound like the same father in FNAF 4 who was mildly annoyed with his sons and barely did anything to stop things between them. Oh, and his relationship with C.C. just does a complete 180. Psychic Friend Fredbear offers comfort and advice (if a bit heavy handedly) to C.C. to confront his fears while Will in Midnight Motorist would probably be the very embodiment of his fears. None of this tracks under BVRunaway whether it's before or after the Big Bite.
Crying child breaking out of his room does not contradict his personality in FNaF 4. Think about it. Why is William constantly keeping him on tabs? Why do you think he has nanny cams installed in his plushies? If this was before any death or remnant discovery then why did Afton build the FNaF 4 experiment chambers? A father should not be spying on his son and feeding into his fears for no good reason unless if he’s done something he shouldn’t have done. Such as, running away from home. I believe midnight motorist was what caused the personality shifts of both BV and Mike. In midnight motorist, BV isn’t fearful of the animatronics and he is easily tricked into following them while in FNaF 4 he is always sobbing, scared and hates being locked in a room. While midnight Mike defends BV, FNaF 4 Michael is now a snarky teen who picks on his brother and plays a cruel prank which would lead to his demise. Yeah it’s the opposites from what we see in the fourth game but the fact that the two are a reflection of the personalities from MM is intriguing. We have to first ask what’s the importance of this mini game, how does it fit the lore? If BV is the runaway then it would explain why he is put into the nightmare experiments, the overall design of the bedroom and why he’s so scared.
i honestly cant stand afton mm from a game design perspective. scott is a competent puzzle and game maker. when was the last game u played where a character in inexplicably changes colors. it would be like if marios hat was orange for one game and the change was not acknowledged.
i saw a theory video recently which said that cc survived the bite and was experimented on by william (that being fnaf 4) using illusion disks and the actual animatronics (which would have been accessible to william while freddys was closed after charlie’s death) and this would explain the line “what have you brought home?” the theorist also proposed that william eventually killed the crying child to experiment a death causing possession, and theorized that cc was actually the one you should not have killed. if you’d like to check it out i can look for it, i dont remember the name now, but it blew my mind. great video i love your perspective!!
Remember if I’m wrong Scott Cawthon retconned it
Scott once said that there was only one retcon he made, I doubt this is the retcon he’s talking about
@@UpStartTugBoati think this is a joke lol
@@UpStartTugBoatobvious joke
Right right
@@UpStartTugBoatumm consider scott is a time traveler 🙄
1) ur a genius this is the most concise MM video I've ever seen
2) If the animatronic is Shadow Freddy and not GoldenFreddy, that also ties in a HUGE ton to "Follow Me," what with Shadow Freddy being used to lure kids to William crime scenes.
- Cori
Connie note: Thoughts on Elizabeth as the CouchPerson? It's a similar sprite to other Generic Children, matches the minimalist design of MustardMan, and she has a "higher standing" with William than Michael does, so she might think she can convince him to leave Mike alone, but "knows better" than to argue further.
- Connie
@Dual-Process-Theory I think it’s unlikely because she’s like, 5. I really doubt William would let her be up at midnight especially since he’s already in a bad mood
@@zetorocks811 first point- fair
second point- it was the 80s kids stayed up till 1am playing with firecrackers
It cant be Shadow Freddy. Whatever Shadow Freddy is, if its an agony creature, it most likely formed from the MCI rather than the Bite of 83. The Novel Trilogy has Shadow Freddy, where the Bite of 83 didnt happen but the MCI did happen.
@@Dual-Process-Theory Most likely not. The CouchPerson is too tall to be a child.
Idk why people think Midnight Motorist is so confusing. Its just William Afton drunk driving home after killing Charlie at Freddy's, Mrs. Afton on the recliner watching TV, telling William to leave Michael alone, him banging the door and making threats, later going around the house to Michaels window (formerly Davids) where he sees Michaels footprints and a singular pair of animatronic footprints.
Specifically, the animatronic footprints are Golden Freddy's, David Aftons footprints. Golden Freddy can teleport.
It cant be some springlock scarecrow cuz those are animatronics and the suits are heavy to carry around.
And it cant be Shadow Freddy because Shadow Freddy is an agony creature born from the MCI rather than the Bite of 83. Shadow Freddy appears in the novel trilogy, where the MCI did happen but the Bite of 83 didnt happen.
you're saying this as if it's confirmed. It's not. I believe that Michael is the couch potato and Dave is the runaway. you don't need to be so cocky to try and convince people.
@Kebab_Lover_99 and you need to calm down. They're just exposing their interpretation
this is what I believe
@@matteoartizzu3759 mb
@@Kebab_Lover_99 Im saying it ignorantly on purpose. I know its not confirmed, although it is what I believe.
9:20 It also doesn't make sense because, according to that one Steam post, only Nightmare BB is canon.
Before we had nightmare gas and discs, the dreamer was very likely CC. If he *could not* have imagined Nightmarionne, then he likely *did not* see the Puppet in any form.
One thing I do wanna say I don’t think in the mound can be crying child’s grave for a couple reasons
1. Fnaf world update 2 has him have a proper gravestone
2. everyone knows he died.
In the week before when the whole phone call happens. A employee tells the bully to get the child away from the bear and there are people also mad at them for doing that.
And in into the pit the announcer states “Please do not shove anybody’s head in the animatronic’s mouth AGAIN”
To add further to this Crying child, quite literally dies in a hospital.
Nobody hates William at this point so imo Crying child would have a regular gravestone at the cemetery
The mound/grave in my opinion, has to be Elizabeth’s
Why
1. Nobody knows Elizabeth died. William covered everything up because of the gas leaks
2. Willam would’ve had to take Elizabeth’s body out at some point and he would’ve had to get rid of it somehow
Or maybe GF, possessed by his brother, shows up at Michael's house just like Susie in Coming Home. So night after night, Michael follows him to Freddy's to be with him. This would be a foreshadowing of Mike's motivations at Freddy's in FNaF 1.
Genuine LOL when you said "maybe we should ask why, but idk it's probably agony or something."
I love (hate) how the games have given us some vague allusions to mechanics (what's remnant? Idk, read a book. But it does exist, I promise!), most of the names of characters, some important dates. But like, very little why, especially where William and his stand, SHADOW FREDDY are concerned. Ghost juice or reviving his son or he's a cold blooded murderer who does it for fun. Who knows, maybe he had prophetic visions that these kids HAVE to die to prevent the apocalypse! There's no in canon contradiction to this explanation!
Edit: oh you don't like Dave as a name. Them's fighting words (nah. Believe what you want. I just can't be convinced his name is not Dave. Scott could say "the Crying Child's name is Jeremy." And I would immediately say "oh he retconned it. That's weird.")
*chefs kiss* I still think Michael worked at FNAF1 and possibly 2 under Williams control, like movie Vanessa, but that still fits
But, if immortal and the restless is relatable for him that early, what if 'the baby' is charlie 'dont wake the baby' puppet?
Movie Vanessa did know if wills crimes
Yeah I actually put this in the video (although it was after the audio and it just popped up on screen so I don’t blame anyone for not noticing), I think it could be a connection but I’m not sure
Here are a couple of things to think about. In sister location we learned some things about Michael Afton, such as he became a purple guy, he was not always purple, his "death" turned him purple, and then there is a scene where he states that the animatronics thought he was his father, which I believe that was meant to be after he turned purple, so they were not simply confused for being his father due to his genetics, they are both dead but still moving. I believe the mustard man of midnight motorist is the father, William but at a time before he has died. As for when William died, I believe that would be what is shown in the Baby ending of FNAF World. I know people think that is Henrey, but I cannot recall why, but the guy there talks about having regrets about building Baby and then in the next game, Sister Location, Elizabeth says to her father William, "Didn't you make her just for me?" I think William took his own life after the death of his daughter by his own creation of Baby and then came back as the original purple guy.
Another thing that goes against Henrey being the one that dies at the end of FNAF World is how Henrey is the one that set up the Pizza Simulator game to burn all the animatronics and set the souls free...unless he is also a walking corpse.
I personally think the runaway is Crying Child. His change in behavior would be from the fear experiments William puts him through as a punishment for running off. He could’ve mistaken Shadow Freddy for Fredbear and maybe he went off to Freddy’s. I don’t think he was brought to Charlie’s body at all, be he was just looking for an escape from home.
JR’s could be a restaurant with Henry as the green man considering Charlie was the only kid with a green wrist band, and he’d be keeping Afton out because they had some kind of falling out in their partnership.
The mound could be just the evidence left over from Charlie’s murder, or a dig cite for one of the restaurants because there’s a clearing wear the mound is.
Only problem is that David/CC would be sleepy as shit in the FNAF 4 minigames from the experiments. He would basically be a night owl
I completely agree with most everything except that I think Mike could go to the mound but yeah like you said, it would be kinda weird
I don't think BVRunaway automatically means his fear has to originate from seeing Charlie's corpse.
In the minigame, we have the couch person saying "he had a rough day," which would mean something happened to the runaway earlier that day. Under BVRunaway, I think this is referring to BV gaining his phobia earlier on in the day.
Nice video, I like the points you bring up and think this is very fitting for the narrative of the series. But, please speak up! I had to increase my volume to almost twice of what I usually listen to videos with. Your mixing is fine, maybe the background music could be a little quieter at times, but the video as a whole is just very quiet, that's my only critique.
Alright thanks, I will take this into account for future videos (except my next one because it’s already done lol, it’s basically a shitpost anyways). Although I’m gonna be real the music is actually really low, I’m pretty sure at one point the volume is at 1, it’s just really loud I guess. So I’ll be sure to increase the voiceover going forward 👍
This is honestly the best mm theory I’ve ever seen the bits of evidence you use really tie it all together
Great theory man! You brought up really interesting plot points such as Shadow Freddy role in FNAF 6.
My theory for Midnight Motorist is that Michael is the runaway, the foot prints is Golden Freddy and the couch person is Mrs.Afton.
I always thought that the couch person looked to be grieving, which matches Mrs.Afton considering the events of the BITE83, Mrs.Afton would be protective of her other children.
Michael for me, seems right to be the runaway. He would tend to lock himself in his room for his guilt. It doesn't really fit the Crying Child's personality for him to do that, even if something traumatized him so bad to be as he is in FNAF 4.
I also think Michael actions here leads him to experience the FNAF 4 gameplay for the first time or maybe a second, aka the nightmare experiments. - "He will be sorry when he gets back."
The foot prints could be either Shadow Freddy or Golden Freddy, it could be the Crying Child as Fredbear, then Michael either goes to Fredbear's again (which I think is the same place where Charlie dies) or maybe the mound of dirt.
I liked how you connected the 7th grave in FNAF World's update 2, which is far away from the others and next to Fredbear. The mound of dirt could be Crying Child's grave.
Also I believe JR's is just a bar btw lol
7:45 the only problem i could see is if shadow freddy takes form from the agony of the MCI instead of charlie's murder, but then again there was a fredbear/freddy animatronic walking around as we see in take cake to the children so im not sure
to be fair, in ucn one of nightmares voicelines is "i am your wickedness, made of flesh" which could indicate that he just took form from any horrible crime afton committed
I still believe in MM83. I just feel like the 87 dice is either saying Mike is Fritz or that It’s a coincidence and a fun nod to FNAF 1’s Custom Night Easter Egg.
On the note, I feel like color connection is really sketchy and a bit convoluted because of how it’ll ignore the narrative and character traits in the lore.
Mike being the Couch Person doesn’t make sense in my opinion because I don’t see William trusting Mike over everything else since William likes to be the one in control of things, especially with his own children. And I can’t see Mike defending his brother BEFORE FNAF 4 because that’ll put him in a punishment from William. So in my opinion, Mrs. Afton makes the most sense as Couch Potato because the person is actually defending their son AND William doesn’t do anything about the person at all and instead go abuse the kid.
And the runaway seems to be more brave and it really doesn’t necessarily make sense that BV would have that character and see Charlie’s corpse like that- which kinda means that Scott retconned it.
And yet people don’t really look that this view and insists on the simple part since BVRunaway was the first conclusion back in 2017.
However, I agree with most of this video
Any theory that uses FNAF world as evidence is a good theory to me! I thought this was a really well done video -- well paced and efficient in information delivery~
I think number 87 may be a reference to the fact that the prints belong to Shadow Freddy
I think the yellow guy is yellow because Sister Location showed another purple guy (Michael) so to not confuse the comunity, Scott made him yellow. Aslo the background is very dark, if he is yellow he could stand out. Yellow is also associated with him.
Yey, new zeto video (something that is as rare as Scott confirming something)
The idea that the mound is CC’s grave doesn’t work, at least if Midnight Motorist is the night of Charlie’s death. Your explanation that William wanted CC’s body to experiment on is the only explanation I’ve seen for this, but it only works if William already knows remnant exists, and if he knows (or at least thinks) that he can bring a person back to life. How would he find out about that? Most likely someone’s death. This early in the timeline, if it’s not CC (which under WillSpeaker it can’t be since he’s presumably alive when the dialogue is said) it’s either Mrs. Afton (if she’s the TV watcher it can’t be her) or Charlie (if the mound already exists and MM is Charlie’s death, it can’t be her).
The only way WillSpeaker works under BV First is if Mrs. Afton is already dead, or William murders Charlie while CC’s in a coma, neither of which work under MikeRunaway (at least with the mound being CCs grave). Or he’s just saying stuff, but most parents don’t suddenly gain the delusion that they can learn necromancy because they lost a child, especially since William probably doesn’t care about his son as much as most parents and if he did try to bring CC back I think it would’ve been for science, not for love.
The runaway pretty much dies.😅 I learned from a MM video by Cosmo that Toy Chica the high school years, an intermission from UCN has a statement of a how she'll get her crush/Afton commited a crime that fits midnight motorist's gameplay pretty much flawlessly and has no bearing on a fazbear entertainment property/Pizzeria: 'I'll invite him over to my house, if he doesn't come, then I'll go to his house. If he doesn't open the door, then I'll find a window. Chimney is always an option.' this whole intermission is an account of all the murders Afton committed. So with this connecting to MM, I'd have to Say that this mini game is connected to fnaf 4's night 6 ending scene. If so it has some dark implications for UCN as a narrative game though.
Something I've noticed is that the Runaway Footprints are alike Mustard Man's ones. Could that indicate that the Runaway is Young Man around 17-18?
I think mustard man is William, the runaway is Mike, couch person is Mrs afton, the mound is bvs grave I guess, the foot prints are golden Freddy, that place is fredbears, and it’s 1983 after Charlie’s death. I think that Mike sees Charlie’s body, and then hears rumors about the puppet moving around causing him to investigate (also golden Freddy causes him to investigate I call this spark Charlie alter m and spark victim alter m respectfully) and then Charlie (who saw Mike when she died, like from the puppet) calls out to him using the fnaf 2 dreams, showing him what happened, Mike doesn’t understand and goes to fnaf 2 to investigate, then Mike gets a good grasp on what’s going on, causing the immortal and the restless to happen, which pisses William off and he goes “ok fine I killed Charlie and crew now if you tell anyone I’ll kill you and your also my acomplice/servant now” and then fnaf 1 happens in 1989 which Mike works as a Williams spy.
The mound I don’t think can be bite victims grave because into the pit and the week before all confirmed, everyone knows he died and he dies in a hospital bed so he likely would’ve had an actual funeral/grave
The grave there is meant to be hidden. I believe the Mound is Elizabeth.
@ I just said that because idk what else
Best MM video in youtube hands down.
Great theory!
William Afton is the perpetrator of the '87 bite after all🙄
I think there's one detail that debunks DCIMM: Midnight Motorist happens at midnight. We know The DCI happens during William's night shift because Save Them shows possessed animatronics moving around, which only happens from 12AM-6AM. If The DCI happens during William's dayshift, that would mean it happened at the very end of his shift & subsequently the beginning of Jeremy Fitzgerald's shift, meaning Jeremy would've come in to begin his night shift, saw the crime scene, and just didn't report anything. That's just ridiculous. So, it's safe to say The DCI happened when William had the night shift.
Like I said earlier, MM happens at midnight, for obvious reasons. The beginning of William's night shift. Why would William come in, cause The DCI, and then just leave hours before his shift ends? Sure, it technically could happen like that, but why? It'd be much simpler, under this idea, to title the minigame "Morning Motorist" or something & just have it take place at 6AM, and literally nothing about the minigame itself would change. So, MM happening at midnight can really only mean it doesn't take place after The DCI.
However, that doesn't mean we should ignore the 87 dice. That would be cherry-picking because of the Spring Bonnie antenna. Like, for example, if people can say the 87 dice is just a reference to how 87 is a FNaF-associated number, why can't I say the Spring Bonnie antenna is just a reference to an iconic FNaF character? Our only reasonable option at this point is to say William is fleeing some crime scene in 1987 that isn't The DCI. Is that Charlie's murder? That remains to be seen. I think it is, but FLaF has yet to finish giving us MM lore, so we'll see.
The DCI are kids that broke into the pizzeria.
In the week before Ralph and the week before says kids Would break into Freddy’s to steal Fazbear memorabilia to prove their bravery.
We see in save them the bodies are all over the place and blood splatters. Because the kids split up.
The mini game is called “save them” Freddy could’ve saved them if he woke up just a little earlier.
As for why it’s called “later that night” William likely just left the building early to take care of the bodies.
@@Browhatisyoudoing Who exactly the DCI kids are doesn't really matter. All that matters is that they're killed during William's night shift.
We know Midnight Motorist takes place at midnight because it's in the name: "MIDNIGHT Motorist." William really has no reason to leave the building early, to his house of all places.
Maybe Puppet put them in the animatronics before Jeremy started his shift?
@@pavret4663 Jeremy would've already started his shift by the time Save Them happened. And there's no way a body is getting stuffed in Mangle.
@@UnoriginalJokester I agree that the DCI were killed during William Night Shift however William does not follow the rules. He doesn’t follow the basic stuff a night guard is supposed to do.
In fact in night 6 phone guy brings the idea up of leaving in the middle of the night showing it’s completely possible
“ Listen j-just finish your shift it’s safer than trying to leave in the middle of the night”
William would have likely had to leave early to get rid of DCI bodies. The bodies that we were not found but there was an investigation
( the police were able to track the kids disappearance back to Freddy’s
Day 3
People start spreading rumors about the disappearance and how something similar happened beforehand
Day 4
(police find Freddys is place the DCI kids seem to have gone to)
Day 5
(Building is on lockdown and William quits because he doesn’t want the police to find out what he did. The police believe that it’s likely a previous employee is involved with the murder)
Day 6
Building gets closed down police find the connection between golden Freddy suit and the killer
We know phone guy doesn’t know the animatronics are possessed because of the week before where he genuinely believes what he saying
THE GOAT IS HERE
so shadow freddy is william's stand
In my personal opinion here’s what I think
Midnight motorist takes place in 1987 for a couple reasons
1. The dice.
2 mph 187
3. The different house.
4. A perfectly parallel Fnaf 2 where the minigames are about the 3 crimes William commit
Charlie’s death
The MCI
The DCI
. The orange guy is William (five laps at Freddy’s basically confirmed it)
. The mini game takes place later after William commits the DCI as the description says
“ Talk about a killer ride! This smooth cruiser is the perfect choice for anyone wanting to flee a crime scene win a race”
. Jrs is what happened to Fredbears after it shut down it got turned into a bar this is shown in the silver eyes with Charlie stating that building was used as a bar for a short time “a dark bar with a country western band playing on the stage” (probably the mediocre melodies)
. The reason jrs is important is because jrs/Fredbear is the Fnaf 6 location evidence for this is
1. The alley where Charlie dies looks exactly like the alley where the scrap animatronics are at
2. In the epilogues for tales of the pizza Plex there’s actually a safe room in the Fnaf 6 location
3. Rockstar Freddy is the mascot and has a purple hat and bowtie, which only Fred bear had before
4. In SB there’s arcade where the art shows Fredbear and spring Bonnie‘s ghost overtop a burning building.
. William is likely not allowed because Of either two reasons
1. They want no association with the old creators of the diner
2. The green guy knows William Afton murdered the 5 children and wants nothing to do with him. Everyone knows William did the MCI they just can’t convict them because there was no bodies found
. The mound is A grave as it stated to be one in one of the guides
. The grave likely belongs to Elizabeth.
It can’t be crying child for 2 reasons
1.everyone knows that he died. His death is public knowledge as confirmed by the week before and into the pits announcer
2. Crying child has no relevance in 6 story
Elizabeth on the other hand no one was around to witness her death when William knows any he covered it up with the gas leaks
. The house is different because William moved after 1983. It’s probably not in the neighborhood anymore because everyone knows William is a criminal
. The person on the couch is Ms Afton.
1. If we look at the midnight motors house, there is no other car meaning that the person on the other couch uses William’s car
2. The person talks to William like they’re on the same level they tell them what to do
3. Into the pit game story parallels midnight motorist And there are only 3 family members in Oswald’s family
Oswald’s mom
Oswald’s dad
Oswald
for midnight motorist, it would be
Mike’s mom
Mike’s dad
Mike
. Mike is the runway no surprise there.
1. All the siblings are dead so, it kinda has to be him
2. Mike is shown to be a rebel
. Mike is likely 16 or 17 since he’s shown to still be living with his parents
. if the Oswald parallel is true the reason why William doesn’t want Mike to keep leaving the house and locked him in his room is because Mike witness William commit the MCI
( note: using parallel as a narrative thing not the game theory way into the pit is canon in my opinion. I’m saying the game has a deeper connection/repeat of events)
. “That place again” would be the 1987 Freddys
. the thing outside the window is likely there because Mike kept going back to that location so something followed him home
. The animatronic outside Mike’s window I think could be W. foxy or Freddy (I am not exactly sure I thought golden Freddy was the most likely option, but it seems in the week before he has a vendetta against Mike)
. “ He’ll be sorry when he gets back” I think can mean 2 things
. Nightmare experiments.
. Forces him to look at the location as Fritz Smith
also william might not be allowed in on Jr's because hes already drunk. If its a bar, its probably the same one he was at before going to murder charlie
also idk about withered foxy or freddy being the animatronic outside of the window, if its in 87 then why not just golden or shadow freddy? that would be a more straight forward answer ithink
Am I the only one who has a bit of trouble keeping up with the narration when there's no space between sentences? It feels oddly similar to reading paragraph after paragraph without punctuation
Oh and check out Cosmo's MM theory it's really good.
Am i the only one personally upset that William is yellow for this one game? I know technically he is the Mustard Man when he's in his fursuit, but its something scott doesn't really do again.
I think that WIlliam is purple becouse he hasnt commited a murder yet and that he killed charlie "later that night"
Wait why hasnt anyone on youtube talked about elizabeths grave before?
I find it funny that Scott cawthon has stated Michael Afton is not the protagonist in FNAF 4, however nobody excepts that because there is multiple points of evidence pointing in favor of that fact and nothing pointing against it, I also prefer the interpretation of Mike is the FNAF 4 protagonist it's also more narratively satisfying.
Do you mean the character encyclopedia? That just says BV is the protagonist of FNaF 4, which is still true with Mike being the player. It also says “he faces nightmares in his bedroom but his *real* story is told in the minigames”, implying that the nightmares aren’t his story
@zetorocks811 that might be the interpretation but I believe Scott said it himself but I'm not 100% sure, I probably should have mentioned I heard this in another theory video once so any miscommunication was entirely my fault sorry about that.
@zetorocks811 however usually when someone says that a character is the protagonist they usually mean of the main part of the game which is the night sections not the mini games.
@ The Character Encyclopedia already gets objective information wrong and had to rely on Dawko for help so I wouldn’t worry too much about it either way
@@zetorocks811 fair enough, it has proven unreliable in some aspects so you are right, but if I am right it is actually kind of amusing you have to at least admit that.
I think that Charlie dies the same night as MCI
Where did Glitchtrap get it's costume? If it is the mimic, then wouldn't it be weird for it to invent a whole new bunny costume? Wouldn't it make more sense if it was copying something that use to be real? Maybe in MM "later that night" refers to fruity maze, because they are both table cabinets. In fruiting maze, Afton is wearing some kind of spring bonnie costume and it might not be a springlock suit.
It’s a springlock suit
@@zetorocks811 I doubt a springlock suit would be stitched together like cloth and be that skin tight
@infsm27 I mean in Fruity Maze it’s the springlock suit
The most common theory I see if that the runaway is Crying Child, but I struggle with that for one reason: Crying Child doesn't lock himself in his room, he is locked in by someone else and he hates it. We literally end those minigames by banging on the door, trying to get out, until we collapse in exhaustion. Yellow Guy reacts to his door being locked as something that the runaway does regularly despite being told not to; that doesn't make sense for Crying Child, who desperately wants the door to be open. Even if, say, Michael was locking him in, and William didn't know that at first, it should be immediately obvious that this isn't something that the Crying Child likes or does intentionally.
In the FNaF 4 bedroom the doors are not able to close, that’s a huge part of the design. There’s no offical source that confirms this is Mike’s room but they do imply it’s the bite victim’s. Also whoever we play as in the game is could barely reach the door knob so it has to be a child and we know Mike is a teenager. The FNaF 4 bedroom was a response to crying child’s actions in midnight motorist. It starts with crying child following shadow freddy and ends with crying child defending against him (yes, nightmare is shadow Freddy).
What if Williams punishment after MM is what causes him to hate being trapped in a room?
Yeah, that's one of the biggest reasons as to why I can't vibe BVRunaway. He *hates* being locked in rooms (even his own).
Also, if you believe WillPlush, BVRunaway makes even mess sense. First cutscene in FNAF 4 has Will as Psychic Friend Fredbear say "What did he do this time? He locked you in your again." which not tells us that not only is this a recurring thing with the brothers; but, William is more exasperated by it then anything.
Come Midnight Motorist, the Runaway locking their door (again, a recurring thing with them) set William off. Like, REALLY SET HIM OFF to the point that he's yelled at his son through the door, banged on the door, went out of his way to try to make it in through the window, and promised that "he would be sorry when he got back", all with the terrifying implication that he was going to get violent.
This doesn't sound like the same father in FNAF 4 who was mildly annoyed with his sons and barely did anything to stop things between them.
Oh, and his relationship with C.C. just does a complete 180. Psychic Friend Fredbear offers comfort and advice (if a bit heavy handedly) to C.C. to confront his fears while Will in Midnight Motorist would probably be the very embodiment of his fears.
None of this tracks under BVRunaway whether it's before or after the Big Bite.
What If The Runaway is William JR 😂
Crying child breaking out of his room does not contradict his personality in FNaF 4. Think about it. Why is William constantly keeping him on tabs? Why do you think he has nanny cams installed in his plushies? If this was before any death or remnant discovery then why did Afton build the FNaF 4 experiment chambers? A father should not be spying on his son and feeding into his fears for no good reason unless if he’s done something he shouldn’t have done. Such as, running away from home. I believe midnight motorist was what caused the personality shifts of both BV and Mike. In midnight motorist, BV isn’t fearful of the animatronics and he is easily tricked into following them while in FNaF 4 he is always sobbing, scared and hates being locked in a room. While midnight Mike defends BV, FNaF 4 Michael is now a snarky teen who picks on his brother and plays a cruel prank which would lead to his demise. Yeah it’s the opposites from what we see in the fourth game but the fact that the two are a reflection of the personalities from MM is intriguing. We have to first ask what’s the importance of this mini game, how does it fit the lore? If BV is the runaway then it would explain why he is put into the nightmare experiments, the overall design of the bedroom and why he’s so scared.
What if freddy second last name was fredbear the second?
So CCs name is in fact Dave? Got it
6:00 12:00 golden freddy ^ ^
i honestly cant stand afton mm from a game design perspective. scott is a competent puzzle and game maker. when was the last game u played where a character in inexplicably changes colors. it would be like if marios hat was orange for one game and the change was not acknowledged.
I’m pretty sure William being orange is just meant to represent him being drunk
I mean tbf if you had to make William another color yellow makes sense because of how connected William is to Springbonnie (and the Fredbear plush)
Kinda quiet.
i saw a theory video recently which said that cc survived the bite and was experimented on by william (that being fnaf 4) using illusion disks and the actual animatronics (which would have been accessible to william while freddys was closed after charlie’s death) and this would explain the line “what have you brought home?” the theorist also proposed that william eventually killed the crying child to experiment a death causing possession, and theorized that cc was actually the one you should not have killed. if you’d like to check it out i can look for it, i dont remember the name now, but it blew my mind. great video i love your perspective!!
sorry unsure if this is clear or not but, this would make cc william’s second victim after charlie, first victim killed with the goal of possession
ae
It can't be Golden Freddy.
He literally tries to kill Mike in both Fnaf 2 night 6 and whole Fnaf 1