Wow it's almost if lower tuning produces a softer sound. You could literally pick any higher and then any lower tuning and you'll have the same effect. 432 is completely arbitrary.
Also it's not more harmonious as we work on a 12 tone equal tempered system, therefore all harmony in terms of intervals sounds comparatively identical no matter what tuning we use.
Wow! yes I hear a big difference. At 432, the sound is relaxing and calming - even when you play loudly. At 440, the sound is strident, edgy and harsh. I'm going to tune my piano and other instruments to 432. Thank you!
the thing is that pianos are built to sound their best at 440hz so lower or higher will lose most of the tone and resonance and wouldn't be a stable tuning either.
@@jamesbigfan364 You know.. After a while of playing, I ended up agreeing with you. My digital piano sounds best at 440.. I am 'retracting' my previous results.. and thank you!
Wow! Big difference. I play classical music and sing arias. When listening to 440Hz, I enjoyed it with my mind, could hear individual notes. But not expecting that listening to 432Hz, the mind got quiet and there was a feeling of peacefulness, oneness, the musical piece became one entity and the notes were part of that one entity, moving and swaying together back and forth. There was definitely deeper sense of connection. I will be tuning my piano to 432Hz! Thank you for making this video. 🙏🌷
What amazed me is that switching from 440 to 432 felt like switching from a solid state amp to a tube amp, or from a CD to vinyl! There is just something softer and more musical about it...
Although actually tuning the piano down to 432 might be even better, because it would likely naturally cause different harmonics compared to digitally tuning down...
In a way, yes. Digitally tuning a recording down creates some degree of distortion. I once tried to convert a single piano note up by one whole octave, and it sounded completely off key and weird. . I realized, it was because there are so many underlying harmonics in an acoustic piano that the harmonics themselves were not preserved equally when shifting the note that high. See my work with A432hz and color on my channel here, The Acoustic Rabbit Hole. @@gcensing6351
Great video. Thanks for showing the difference. This becomes a less "academic" issue and more real when you can compare the two frequencies side by side. Yes, when played at 432 Hz, it is definitely more comforting, soothing and peaceful.....
I've been streaming in 432 and sometimes 440. What I miss in 432 is the familiarity of 440 ( decades listening to it), the edginess. But 432 is like experiencing 20/20 vision after a life long slightly blurry vision ( the familiar)
What a difference, it is hard to describe. From the first few tones I felt the difference, like a tingling moving to the ends of my fingertips and toes. Who would have thought? I simply just found this video in the YT recommendations. Thank you for sharing.
I've performed live in 432hz tuning for some time now & I could pick it straight away first hearing all those clashing harmonics & standing waves of 440hz "I heard there was a secret chord that David played & it pleased the lord"
@@joshhickson7551Gosh, I thought the so-called resonance was just “a thing in research papers” and wouldn’t be sensible by a normal human being. But I literally just felt some tiny little buzz in my fingers, which were far away from my speakers, when I played it in 432hz! 😮
Both were wonderful. As I listened to the 440, I remained still to listen and enjoyed. But when I listened to the 432, I caught myself swaying deeply with the music and continued when it was over. Amazing.
Exactly, the music is just so much more meaningful in 432, I really feel, my breath slowed, I deeply calmed, I feel energy and excitement in my body, and I almost have tears in my eyes 😅. Both are great, 440 is good too, but 432 has that feeling that 440 doesn't have
@@skLuke638 exactly, you don't know but I play piano too, and I like to improvise and play freely on it. And switching to 432hz has just changed everything for me. I usually don't feel so connected and free with the music I play. But here the notes are seemless, they flow together and there is no wall as for when I play 440. It is like the harshness has been removed. 432 let's me really feel the music and it free the note. I don't care about what lot of people say, that there is no difference, I also don't care about those conspiracy theories and more, I just know that it feels much better to play and hear at 432 than 440 hz. That is enough for me to switch to 432 😊
432 is softer which sets a certain mood; the transitions, at least to me are more noticeable. 440 is not necessarily harsher but more like exciting. It's like comparing a baritone to a soprano singing the same song.
Die 432-Hz-Version klingt für mich insbesondere in den hohen Lagen nicht angestrengt, wie bei 440 Hz, sondern immer noch angenehm und enstpannt. Ich spiele inzwischen selbst auch nur noch auf 432 Hz, weil meine Ohren das einfach lieber mögen und als angenehmer empfinden - es ist für mich ein körperlich wahrnehmbarer Unterschied..
People need to understand a few facts. A modern grand is built with a frequency of A = 440Hz - 442Hz maintaining the ideal string tension for every string used in our equal temperament. When you tune such a modern grand on 432 the strings are simply not on their optimal stretch . In order to ''hear'' what 432 Hz could sound like in an ideal way, a total new instrument should be built with optimal specifications of string length, width, tension that accompany 432Hz in the best way possible. Listening to 'tunings' on RUclips is flawed all the way. The comments of more 'relaxing'' and 'less harsh' have nothing to do with the tuning, but either an artificial conversion of the wav file from 440 to 432 OR loser/lower tuned strings that lose their pronounced edge when struck by a hammer. The result in both cases is a slightly softer tone that sound often better on a RUclips comparison clip. . In real life however, and i have tuned a few piano's on 432Hz, the piano loses much of it's ''body'' . Most people need an intonation of the hammer heads to reduce the harshness of the perceived sound. It has nothing to do with tuning.
Слушала ночью, перед сном. От 440 моя нервная система содрогается, неприятная боль в теле. На 432 могу продолжить расслабление и лечь спать под музыку и уснуть.
The 440 original evoked in me feelings of nostalgia (and invariably, loss). Really speaking to the music itself, it is unsettling in a way that only certain pieces can be and yet yields satisfaction in the knowledge that it elicited an emotional response. (Truthfully a testament to your playing and composition) The 432 although not really sounding all that different, didn't manage to generate that same response in me. It felt easier to listen to, but ultimately less impactful for me. Thank you for doing this, it's a rather interesting exercise.
The 440Hz sounded amazing. The 432Hz sounded amazing too, but a bit less fiesty. It did not sound as complete as the 440Hz I think you play so well, you made both sound great. I would go with the 440Hz.
When you look at all the spaces in between the notes at 432Hz the difference between each notes is the same. Pi to be exact. It's the Fibonacci Sequence
As you go up in frequency, the spacing between semitones increases. Check out "This is You Brain on Music" Daniel Levitin. A very good explanation of the keyboard and the spacing between semitones. Very similar to our RF spectrum in use for radios. The higher in frequency you go, the wider the RF channels are. This is how you get more information across higher frequencies. This was quite eye opening for me as I work with RF communications. A quote from Infinite5ths: Think of it this way: Every time you double the frequency, you raise the pitch by an octave (12 semitones). So from A-440Hz to A-880Hz is 12 semitones. But then from A-880Hz to A-1760Hz is also 12 semitones. In one case you have a change of 440Hz spread over 12 semitones. In the other you have a change of 880Hz spread over 12 semitones. So as you go up the pitch scale, each semitone consists of a slightly larger change in frequency than the semitone below it. That is why the pitch system is non-linear. There is no set number of (change in) Hz per semitone. So the low end of the keyboard, the spacing between semitones is narrow in frequency than the octaves going up.
from the mathematical view, the multiplication factor to change the frequency by one half tone is the 12th root of 2. If you multiply 440 Hz 12 times with the 12th root of 2, you get 880 Hz. Sorry, but neither Pi nor the Fibonacci sequence do deliver any hint in this question.
440 bright and solid, while 432 mellow and somewhat nostalgic! Nice performance I'd enjoy listening both versions, I even wonder how it'd feel if you change the key.
Thanks for your nice feedback. I think changing the key doesn't make a big difference at least for the topic 432 or 440 hz. for the song itself a transposing can change the sound enormously.
Nostalgic is such a perfect description. It sounds like it’s coming through an analogue film. As soon as 432hz hit, I really felt it on an emotional level, where 440hz didn’t even register on that level. Really cool. I’m going to tune my guitar accordingly.
In both the passion in the execution is undeniable... I'm not a musician, but 440Hz sounds like it's missing something in places... Undoubtedly 432Hz is more comfortable to listen to and seems more complete... Also check that it is the correct 432Hz and not just a bait... Yes it is real 432Hz Thanks for the comparison...
So I noticed 432 sounded exactly 8 Hz lower than 440! Did I win? No seriously, I loved lower tone quality of the 432. 440 was crisper. I’d love to hear this one both pianos together.
I listened with eyes closed. Heard/felt the change to 432..goose flesh and shivered. What that means? Only that I knew it changed and was more effective.. Beautiful piece of music and TY for playing for us. Mahe Ohna ✌️ Favour
Holy molly! We are both professional performing musicians with my hubby listening to this right now, and we are absolutely blown away with 432!!! 😱 It's absolutely different music, OMG we never thought it would be such a HUGE difference. 432 is so comforting and just sounds better overall. My husband has perfect pitch, but I don't and it sounds like a completely different piece to me. Amazing!
the 440 hz is has more bright sounding and the 432hz it had more bass that's made the listener feel more chill, because the sound is not bright as 440hz
Yes, I can melt and stop my mind in both. Both are emotional. And it is the question of present moment what i need more. Sometimes more sharp tones to encourage me to action - tuning in 440hz, sometimes calming, embracing - 432hz. In my opinion nothing is better or worse. It depends if I am able to feel the music from the point of silence inside of me or to be able to get there and let the mind go and ...
I am not so sure if digital processing of this piece to 432 Hz gives the best picture of the sound to a comparison. I would prefer this piece to be played again, on another piano tuned to 432 Hz.
Great video, I was hesitant if to change the tune of my grand piano after reading many theories, but was advised that if I listen to classical music and I like it, that I would not like it to have different tune on my piano. So the only change of frequency we did was on our electronic piano. In this video I loved both versions leaning more towards the 440 Hz, the first one is very uplifting and giving higher vibes, higher tones sound crystal-like and the second version is very calming. Briliant performance. Thanks for this video.
Yes, of course... I've talked to my piano tuner about this several times, who is also a master piano maker and expert for legal issues. For simple pianos, tuning to 432 Hz can work, but he advised me against it, especially for larger modern grand pianos. The construction of the grand piano is very complex and tuned to individual vibrations. It could happen that the grand piano no longer sounds good at 432 Hz. It would also mean that after retuning to 432 Hz you would have to retune it very frequently, as it would take a long time for the new tuning to be held by the strings. - So, a lot of work, cost and risk for a high-quality instrument. But if I had an old upright piano standing around, I would give it a try. :)
@@mgpiano I completely understand why tuning a modern piano and especially a grand to 432hz would be counter productive. They were definitely made with specific tunings in mind and I can see how going against that would be difficult and not worth it in many ways. And yes I agree with you that tuning an old upright to 432hz would definitely be cool and perfectly fitting!
I could barely feel the different tuning on this. Apart of that, nice track, I find myself humming a beautiful melody over your piano base. 🙂 Reminds me of "identities" from vision divine somehow
440 felt powerful, literally grabbed me. I could hear and feel the emotion. 432 felt hollow and safe. Like a soft landing. Less jarring than 440, empty. I can feel the difference, and I think I'd prefer the stress of a good song, nice and loud 440hz, to hear and feel every tone, esp while exercising.
Atleast this song on this instrument. The 432 is more appealing. The 440 kinda made me feel uneasy and uninterested so i skipped through most of that section, but i listened to the full 432 section. The tone better represented the song i think. Calming
Both are beautiful. 440Hz is deep, deep sadness. Suffering that cannot be escaped. 432hz isn't just for sadness. I feel strength and passion to Face Suffering.
The conversion was perfect. Don't hear any artefacts. May I ask how you did the conversion? Wondering if you have the piano itself tuned to 432, I believe it will sound even better. 440 is definitely edgy and more "distant", but familiar. 432 is like experiencing 20/20 vision after decades of the familiar slightly blurry vision. You can now stream music in 432 using vst and Audirvana. I use Elastique vst, and Qobuz.
Tolles Experiment. Wenn man nur 432 ohne Vergleich hört, merkt man keinen Unterschied. Durch die Umrechnung mag die Qualität etwas leiden, aber rein die Tonhöhe würde ich glaube ich 432 bevorzugen. Es klingt etwas interessanter.
Schöner Vergleich, danke dafür. Finde beide Versionen gut. Die 440 Hz hat für mich in einigen Passagen etwas mehr Brillianz, dafür aber auch einen etwas härteren Klang. Die 432 Hz hört sich weicher und runder an. Mir persönlich fehlt bei der 432 Hz etwas.
Very interesting observations! I've been streaming in 432 and sometimes 440. What I miss in 432 is the familiarity of 440 ( decades listening to it), the edginess. But 432 is like experiencing 20/20 vision after a life long slightly blurry vision ( the familiar)
@@mgpiano ❤ ... kam gerade nochmal in mein Bewusstsein zurück das Thema. 440Hz assoziiere ich mit kristallin, Bergkristall bis Diamant. 432Hz tatsächlich organisch, Wachstum. Hat der japan. Wissenschaftler, der die Wasserkristalle sichtbar macht, eigentlich auch mal Bilder gezeigt von Wasser, bespielt mit diesen beiden unterschiedlichen Frequenzen?
Very great playing and song. I liked both. I don't have perfect pitch to compare. If you don't tell me I don't know. Very emotional, thanks for sharing
I’m a concert level piano technician and with 47 years experience, and a designer soundboards. I’m not a troll, nor a hater of this. I will add that pianos are designed with scales (tension,etc.) to sound best at a certain pitch. Bosendorfers, for example, are recommended by the factory to be tuned to A443. When tuned at the recommended pitch (as they were designed) the sound “pops”, lacking a better term. When I’ve tuned pianos for clients that want A432 I’ve found that the sound isn’t as vibrant as the board and scale needs. Some clients seem to like 432, but many immediately ask me to tune it back to A440. There is also a trend to tune to A444. Again, if a piano wasn’t designed for A440 this changes things drastically. I hope my comments aren’t taken as trolling, but before people start asking their tuner to drop the piano to 432 please don’t think this is some sort of magical pitch. Pianos “like” certain tensions and not all pianos will sound well at a pitch they weren’t designed for.
Thank you very much for your detailed feedback and for sharing your experience with us. Of course you are not a troll! :D Just as you explain, my piano tuner also advised me against tuning this piano to 432. He was very sure that it would not sound any better. Glad to hear other experienced people like you confirm this. There are so many aspects that determine the sound, the frequency alone is not it either. ... That Bösendorfer recommends 443 Hz is really interesting. Unfortunately, I have never played one. :)
A clear difference - the instrument sounds less stressed at 432 Hz. But I have to wonder how realistic the digital reprocessing to 432 Hz is. Accurate simulation of a piano re-tuning is extremely complex and difficult. Also, my GX-6 sounds sweeter and less harsh than yours even though it's tuned to 440 Hz. I cannot get such a strident quality from mine, even at fortissimo.
It is cool that on my Clavinova I can tune not just the piano but every instrument found in the CVP to 432 or 440 or up or down from there. It is easy to do as well.
Musician/Composer here. I find A432 more aligned to my inner voice, which is to say that the sense of it sits well within my voice. Therefore, and since Music itself is first and foremost of a vocal conception, it would follow that A432 is more aligned to the source. But that my career as a composer has spanned 50 years, and I have never given a thought to it, I doubt that I will think all that much about it again after this. My point: I mostly hear the sounds I imagine and go from there. And, for the past two decades, I have written all my music using a piano despairingly in need of tuning. Not that I really know why beyond saying it tests my sense of pitch, do I prefer it that way. For a tuner to enter my music room and fix it would likely dismantle my world, but more my inner world of Silence versus Sound.
Thank you so much for sharing your experience with us. After so long and so much lived music, you certainly look at things differently than when you started. As you can read here in these comments alone, the "most pleasant sound" is a very personal matter. And that's a good thing too.
@@mgpiano I have found Music to be my greatest teacher. Essentially, where through Love I learned about Creation and through creating did I experience Love, has it all been a journey of spirit. Everything, as I perceive it, is of the one vibration. Blessings, Markus!
Перенастройка фортепьяно в 432 Гц - это, безусловно, лучший и более естественный способ получить нужное звучание! Тембр и резонансы инструмента будут более точными, поскольку фортепьяно изначально настроено в нужной частоте. Перенастроить фортепьяно - это лучше для качества записи. Использовать цифровое изменение частоты - это проще и быстрее, но с заметной потерей качества.
Si, la differenza è abissale! Il suono 432 hz è armonico e dona una stare di benessere generale, mentre il suono 440 hz lo percepisco come se avessi attorno un calabrone che vuole pungere. Il 432 è armonia pura e il 440 è il suo opposto. Grazie per l’interpretazione accurata! 🙏💜
beautiful music and talented performer 😊 now the question I have is the following: since detuning A4 from 440 to 432 Hz and then tuning the other 87 keys in relation to A4 lowers each note of the piano by approx 1/3 semitone, how would we appreciate the same song played on A440 but transposed 1 semitone lower would we feel the same improvement in terms of richness and melancholic appreciation as many have reported ?😊
I would say every transposing changes the whole sound significantly as the tuning of the 88 keys is not "linear thing". also playing a simple song in another key makes a big difference.
i like the old 435Hz european standard,, not as heavy as 432Hz but not as high as 440Hz.. I find I do not like vocals at 440-442Hz.. greatly prefer 435Hz. THat 20 cents shift from 440Hz to 435Hz makes dramatic opera sound warmer and smoother. Especailly modern 442Hz on Verdi and Puccini grate my ears..
@@greatnationnow thank you so much for your words. 🙏 That‘s a good idea... I can make a comparison of 440, 435 and 432 Hz with one of the new recordings from last weekend. On these the piano is freshly tuned... 💪
iam at the 440 Version.. - that makes me to feel the music at my hand on the piano feeling also listening with my ears, body and mind.. that makes me sing.. earlier or later *gg* -- also the 440 hz as the Base Sound ist Grounded and Fully Based.. thats my mind.. Thank you For ! 440
The real comparison would be if the pitch was not converted digitally, but if it were a real piano tuned at 432 Hz. Here, the 432 sounds to me like an old cassette, which is dragged a bit by the tape recorder...
I listened blind, didn't watch the video till after listening so I didn't trick myself. 440 I could hear some of the notes clearer but at 432 it was softer although I'm unsure it digitally reprocessing it could change the quality. I've listened to other 432hz and preferred them but with this I'm not totally sure.
I play guitar. I have found by using 432 for long time will set me in a calm space. Not an hour or even a day.I tried a couple of weeks. Denny the 440 during that time. When you change back, let me know your feelings about it. I have also used 438. It has a similar affect
The 432hz overall sound is good, however something is lost in the melody and hits me wrong at points. The 440hz notes a crisp and hit at the right places. It may be because the 432 is digitally processed changing the playing technique.
The music was beautiful! Both versions. But it's true the 440hz is harsher and more agitating. Where as the 432hz is wonderfully warm and peaceful, even when you got to the more dramatic parts. I think 432 hz might make a big difference in emotional impact. More pleasant. I think I will have my Piano turned to 432hz also. Thanks very much.
Both performances are acceptable to me, not looking at the keys being played. The 432 does sound a bit more relaxing actually, so I would have to agree with a lot of the comments here in that regard. Since I have perfect pitch, watching his hands playing in 440 was driving me a little nuts listening to it in 432. However, that being said, and this goes out to anyone putting out a piano performance in this platform or anywhere else, make sure you get the piano tuned beforehand. The fact that the piano here is so wretchedly out of tune is absolutely unforgivable. I'm a recording engineer, FOH engineer, sound system engineer, a keyboard musician of 65 years and a piano tuner. I can't even begin to say how many piano performances I've heard that could have been just wonderful had the piano been in tune!
Yes, you‘re right, the piano wasn‘t tuned before the recording and I also don‘t have pro recording equipment. But please don‘t take it so serious. It‘s not a scientific experiment, just a little fun experiment on a hobby channel. Because of my main job I have so less time for my piano and just used a good moment to record something, nothing else… My respect for your perfect pitch, I admire that! 👍 On my last two videos the piano was tuned the day before. Maybe better for your professional ears. 😉
@@mgpiano this was a really cool experiment, you're very talented and you played a beautiful song. I think it's one of the most worthwhile videos I've ever seen on the internet, and I'm an old coot 🙂👍
440 Hz ist wesentlich kraftvoller , ich denke für Chillout oder Meditationsmusik kann 432Hz besser klingen. Bei diesem Stück finde ich beide Varianten sehr schön. Ich kann nicht sagen was mir besser gefällt. Allerdings glaube ich das bei Genres wie Techno, House oder oder härterer Rockmusik sowie auch Metall 432 Hz eher kontraproduktiv ist. Das ist alles auch etwas Esoterisch was hier reininterpretiert wird. Herbert von Karajan verwendete bei den Berliner Philharmonikern 445Hz,in anderen Ländern wie zb Schweiz sind es 444 HZ. Bei Barock Musik wird manchmal 415 HZ verwendet ,da ist dann der Kammerton A fast einen Halbton tiefer wie bei 440 HZ. Ich sag es mal so 432 HZ finde ich friedvoller oder sanfter. 440 HZ kraftvoller.
432 captivates a part of my soul in a way that 440 does not. If I was singing along it would have to be about something profound where 440 felt more mundane in comparison.
Couldn't a 440hz-tuned piano get a similar effect by using some kind of minor scale, or playing at a lower area or octave? 440hz sounds crisper, or brighter might the better descriptor, while 432hz gives a more mellow & hollow, almost somber or depressed emotion to the piece. I'm not sure which I prefer. Which felt better for you to play? idk, maybe 432hz is a new fad? Sometimes 432hz sounds ugly to me from some other comparison videos I've heard here on youtube.
Barok dönemde LA = 415 miş. Giderek daha güçlü ve sivri sesler duymak için frekans arttırılmış. 432 de bu artış durdurulmalıymış. Kulak daha tize alışınca düşük frekans bol elbise gibi geliyor. Aklım 440 iyi derken duygularım 432 yi seviyor.
![Megan Thee Stallion - Mamushi (Remix) [feat. TWICE] [Official Audio]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5c0_u9PsrsQ/mqdefault.jpg)
432 sounds more harmonious and softer, 440 sounds harsher
Wow it's almost if lower tuning produces a softer sound. You could literally pick any higher and then any lower tuning and you'll have the same effect. 432 is completely arbitrary.
Also it's not more harmonious as we work on a 12 tone equal tempered system, therefore all harmony in terms of intervals sounds comparatively identical no matter what tuning we use.
@@efmusic04 whatever , I liked it better
@@efmusic04 your inability to "hear" is astonishing. I hope that someday you can feel the music as others can.
It's sad really.
@@jtystowe1149 well you seem to have the inability to come out of your illogical echo chamber.
Wow! yes I hear a big difference. At 432, the sound is relaxing and calming - even when you play loudly. At 440, the sound is strident, edgy and harsh. I'm going to tune my piano and other instruments to 432. Thank you!
100%
No is NTSC and Play
the thing is that pianos are built to sound their best at 440hz so lower or higher will lose most of the tone and resonance and wouldn't be a stable tuning either.
@@jamesbigfan364 You know.. After a while of playing, I ended up agreeing with you. My digital piano sounds best at 440.. I am 'retracting' my previous results.. and thank you!
@@suhndog np
Wow! Big difference. I play classical music and sing arias. When listening to 440Hz, I enjoyed it with my mind, could hear individual notes. But not expecting that listening to 432Hz, the mind got quiet and there was a feeling of peacefulness, oneness, the musical piece became one entity and the notes were part of that one entity, moving and swaying together back and forth. There was definitely deeper sense of connection. I will be tuning my piano to 432Hz! Thank you for making this video. 🙏🌷
Thank you very mich for your words! 😊🍀
What amazed me is that switching from 440 to 432 felt like switching from a solid state amp to a tube amp, or from a CD to vinyl! There is just something softer and more musical about it...
Although actually tuning the piano down to 432 might be even better, because it would likely naturally cause different harmonics compared to digitally tuning down...
In a way, yes. Digitally tuning a recording down creates some degree of distortion. I once tried to convert a single piano note up by one whole octave, and it sounded completely off key and weird. . I realized, it was because there are so many underlying harmonics in an acoustic piano that the harmonics themselves were not preserved equally when shifting the note that high.
See my work with A432hz and color on my channel here, The Acoustic Rabbit Hole. @@gcensing6351
Not so much hear a difference but most definitely feel a difference.
I felt my breathing slow on 432. Was not expecting that. 440 sounded sharp and crisp. Both are nice for their uniqueness of feeling and tone.
Test the vibration of both frecvency, you will see, with eyes, the difference !!!! The original, was 432 Hz !! They modulated to 440, for a reason !😊
432hz brought emotion with it, even though I just heard the same song 👍🏼 wonderful how powerful music “can” be
Thank you :D
Yes, you can feel it in your chest. I hope he plays this again but live in 432Hz
432 was softer and more harmonious. Thank you for sharing.
Great video. Thanks for showing the difference. This becomes a less "academic" issue and more real when you can compare the two frequencies side by side. Yes, when played at 432 Hz, it is definitely more comforting, soothing and peaceful.....
Thank you Ken! :)
A 440 Sounded more aggressive to me. I love the transition of the minors into the majors in the 432 Hz version.
I've been streaming in 432 and sometimes 440. What I miss in 432 is the familiarity of 440 ( decades listening to it), the edginess. But 432 is like experiencing 20/20 vision after a life long slightly blurry vision ( the familiar)
Omg at 432 my heart & soul felt it was more connected. I’m shocked
What a difference, it is hard to describe. From the first few tones I felt the difference, like a tingling moving to the ends of my fingertips and toes. Who would have thought? I simply just found this video in the YT recommendations. Thank you for sharing.
I've performed live in 432hz tuning for some time now & I could pick it straight away first hearing all those clashing harmonics & standing waves of 440hz "I heard there was a secret chord that David played & it pleased the lord"
432 has the same clashing harmonics and standing waves because we work on a 12 tone equal tempered system.
432 resonates in water better, you can find visual proof online. Remember we are 68% water
@@joshhickson7551Gosh, I thought the so-called resonance was just “a thing in research papers” and wouldn’t be sensible by a normal human being. But I literally just felt some tiny little buzz in my fingers, which were far away from my speakers, when I played it in 432hz! 😮
Exactly! I listen to Jonathan Antoine sing that one,....it's beautiful.
440 felt a little harsh, sometimes a little muddy. 432 was crisp, melodious, and comforting. Thank you, I wondered if I could hear a difference.
Yes, like there were more chordal interactions. 440 feels compressed and black/white.
Schumann Frequenz mit 432 Hz muss ich nun nicht mehr hören -
deine 432 Hz Pianostücke sind einfach wunderbar, danke Markus...👋 💖
Hab lieben Dank! 🙏
Schuman frequenz = A444hz.
A432 = Mozartian. Physical.
- _The Acoustic Rabbit Hole_
I feel the 432 as peaceful and flowing it feels right and normal. And Mark, I appreciate your wonderful playing.
Both were wonderful. As I listened to the 440, I remained still to listen and enjoyed. But when I listened to the 432, I caught myself swaying deeply with the music and continued when it was over. Amazing.
Thank you 🍀
Exactly, the music is just so much more meaningful in 432, I really feel, my breath slowed, I deeply calmed, I feel energy and excitement in my body, and I almost have tears in my eyes 😅. Both are great, 440 is good too, but 432 has that feeling that 440 doesn't have
As I listened to it again, I felt an edge removed & sensed even a different heartbeat, something not noticed before. Amazing.
@@skLuke638 exactly, you don't know but I play piano too, and I like to improvise and play freely on it. And switching to 432hz has just changed everything for me. I usually don't feel so connected and free with the music I play. But here the notes are seemless, they flow together and there is no wall as for when I play 440. It is like the harshness has been removed. 432 let's me really feel the music and it free the note. I don't care about what lot of people say, that there is no difference, I also don't care about those conspiracy theories and more, I just know that it feels much better to play and hear at 432 than 440 hz. That is enough for me to switch to 432 😊
@@bobbyzeno8889mit der Gitarre machte ich nach über 20 Jahren gleiche Erfahrungen. Und der Unterschied, was es mit mir macht, war sofort da 😊
432 is softer which sets a certain mood; the transitions, at least to me are more noticeable. 440 is not necessarily harsher but more like exciting. It's like comparing a baritone to a soprano singing the same song.
Yes, it's more "exciting", and familiar.
Die 432-Hz-Version klingt für mich insbesondere in den hohen Lagen nicht angestrengt, wie bei 440 Hz, sondern immer noch angenehm und enstpannt. Ich spiele inzwischen selbst auch nur noch auf 432 Hz, weil meine Ohren das einfach lieber mögen und als angenehmer empfinden - es ist für mich ein körperlich wahrnehmbarer Unterschied..
Das berichten viele. Welches Instrument spielst du auf 432?
How do u convert it to 432-hz
People need to understand a few facts. A modern grand is built with a frequency of A = 440Hz - 442Hz maintaining the ideal string tension for every string used in our equal temperament. When you tune such a modern grand on 432 the strings are simply not on their optimal stretch . In order to ''hear'' what 432 Hz could sound like in an ideal way, a total new instrument should be built with optimal specifications of string length, width, tension that accompany 432Hz in the best way possible. Listening to 'tunings' on RUclips is flawed all the way. The comments of more 'relaxing'' and 'less harsh' have nothing to do with the tuning, but either an artificial conversion of the wav file from 440 to 432 OR loser/lower tuned strings that lose their pronounced edge when struck by a hammer. The result in both cases is a slightly softer tone that sound often better on a RUclips comparison clip. . In real life however, and i have tuned a few piano's on 432Hz, the piano loses much of it's ''body'' . Most people need an intonation of the hammer heads to reduce the harshness of the perceived sound. It has nothing to do with tuning.
432 Hz Soothing! Thank you for excellent presentation!
Слушала ночью, перед сном. От 440 моя нервная система содрогается, неприятная боль в теле. На 432 могу продолжить расслабление и лечь спать под музыку и уснуть.
ON the piano at 432 hz my cat jumped up on my desk to listen. She wont leave. Cats like it too.
haha, my dog likes the piano as well and starts to sing :D
That is why it is called DIVINE SOUND FREQUENCIES.
The 440 original evoked in me feelings of nostalgia (and invariably, loss). Really speaking to the music itself, it is unsettling in a way that only certain pieces can be and yet yields satisfaction in the knowledge that it elicited an emotional response. (Truthfully a testament to your playing and composition)
The 432 although not really sounding all that different, didn't manage to generate that same response in me. It felt easier to listen to, but ultimately less impactful for me. Thank you for doing this, it's a rather interesting exercise.
В том то и дело. 440 более тревожный и в 40 годах перенастроили весь инструмент на 440. 432 более мягкий и мелодичный.
The 440Hz sounded amazing. The 432Hz sounded amazing too, but a bit less fiesty. It did not sound as complete as the 440Hz I think you play so well, you made both sound great. I would go with the 440Hz.
Thank you very much!
When you look at all the spaces in between the notes at 432Hz the difference between each notes is the same. Pi to be exact. It's the Fibonacci Sequence
As you go up in frequency, the spacing between semitones increases. Check out "This is You Brain on Music" Daniel Levitin. A very good explanation of the keyboard and the spacing between semitones. Very similar to our RF spectrum in use for radios. The higher in frequency you go, the wider the RF channels are. This is how you get more information across higher frequencies. This was quite eye opening for me as I work with RF communications. A quote from Infinite5ths: Think of it this way: Every time you double the frequency, you raise the pitch by an octave (12 semitones). So from A-440Hz to A-880Hz is 12 semitones. But then from A-880Hz to A-1760Hz is also 12 semitones. In one case you have a change of 440Hz spread over 12 semitones. In the other you have a change of 880Hz spread over 12 semitones. So as you go up the pitch scale, each semitone consists of a slightly larger change in frequency than the semitone below it. That is why the pitch system is non-linear. There is no set number of (change in) Hz per semitone. So the low end of the keyboard, the spacing between semitones is narrow in frequency than the octaves going up.
from the mathematical view, the multiplication factor to change the frequency by one half tone is the 12th root of 2. If you multiply 440 Hz 12 times with the 12th root of 2, you get 880 Hz. Sorry, but neither Pi nor the Fibonacci sequence do deliver any hint in this question.
Wow 432 is awesome! So mellow and nicer❤
Beide Versionen sind wunderbar, mir persönlich gefällt 432 Hz besser weil es sich für mich weicher anhört. 🥰
440 bright and solid, while 432 mellow and somewhat nostalgic!
Nice performance I'd enjoy listening both versions, I even wonder how it'd feel if you change the key.
Thanks for your nice feedback. I think changing the key doesn't make a big difference at least for the topic 432 or 440 hz. for the song itself a transposing can change the sound enormously.
Nostalgic is such a perfect description. It sounds like it’s coming through an analogue film. As soon as 432hz hit, I really felt it on an emotional level, where 440hz didn’t even register on that level. Really cool. I’m going to tune my guitar accordingly.
I liked the soulfulness I felt played at 432 hz. Nicely done!
thank you!
What a beautiful song... Excellently played... Thank you so much for this treat... 💗
thank you for your words!
432 for song in the following keys:
C minor/E flat major
F minor/A flat major
B flat minor/C sharp major
D minor/F major
G minor/ B flat major
The 432 feels warm. Relaxing, gentle, but the 440 sounds stark, brash and bounces of the hard surfaces.
In both the passion in the execution is undeniable...
I'm not a musician, but 440Hz sounds like it's missing something in places...
Undoubtedly 432Hz is more comfortable to listen to and seems more complete...
Also check that it is the correct 432Hz and not just a bait... Yes it is real 432Hz
Thanks for the comparison...
I can hear it and feel it!!!! Love Arrangement/Song.... Thank You Young Lad!!!
"heilend" hin oder her, ich werde immer ein Fan von 440 bleiben :D Vielen Dank für den direkten Vergleich.
Sehr gerne 😊
darf ich fragen warum? 🙂
@@Rijeka1074 einfach Gefühl. Immer wenn ich einen Vergleich höre, gefällt mir 440 besser :-)
So I noticed 432 sounded exactly 8 Hz lower than 440! Did I win? No seriously, I loved lower tone quality of the 432. 440 was crisper. I’d love to hear this one both pianos together.
You won! 😀
both together would sound out of tune, it’s more a case of one or the other..😊
@@andreh.dupuis8475 haha, definitely! 😊 For sure he means one by one…
I listened with eyes closed. Heard/felt the change to 432..goose flesh and shivered. What that means? Only that I knew it changed and was more effective..
Beautiful piece of music and TY for playing for us.
Mahe Ohna ✌️ Favour
Holy molly! We are both professional performing musicians with my hubby listening to this right now, and we are absolutely blown away with 432!!! 😱 It's absolutely different music, OMG we never thought it would be such a HUGE difference. 432 is so comforting and just sounds better overall. My husband has perfect pitch, but I don't and it sounds like a completely different piece to me. Amazing!
the 440 hz is has more bright sounding and the 432hz it had more bass that's made the listener feel more chill, because the sound is not bright as 440hz
I don't know which is best, but I'm playing the video over and over just to hear that heavenly music you play.
Thank you :)
Thank you, I love to hear that! 😊
Yes, I can melt and stop my mind in both. Both are emotional. And it is the question of present moment what i need more. Sometimes more sharp tones to encourage me to action - tuning in 440hz, sometimes calming, embracing - 432hz. In my opinion nothing is better or worse. It depends if I am able to feel the music from the point of silence inside of me or to be able to get there and let the mind go and ...
@@ivanasakura1234 😊🙏🙃
I am not so sure if digital processing of this piece to 432 Hz gives the best picture of the sound to a comparison. I would prefer this piece to be played again, on another piano tuned to 432 Hz.
I totally agree with you... but than you might have the problem that every piano sounds a bit different, even the same model...
Great video, I was hesitant if to change the tune of my grand piano after reading many theories, but was advised that if I listen to classical music and I like it, that I would not like it to have different tune on my piano. So the only change of frequency we did was on our electronic piano.
In this video I loved both versions leaning more towards the 440 Hz, the first one is very uplifting and giving higher vibes, higher tones sound crystal-like and the second version is very calming. Briliant performance. Thanks for this video.
Thank you very much! ... tuning your piano to 432 is not simple step, which I would not recommend...
@@mgpianoMay I ask why you would not recommend tuning your actual piano to 432? That’s something I think would be nice if a piano tuner could do.
Yes, of course... I've talked to my piano tuner about this several times, who is also a master piano maker and expert for legal issues. For simple pianos, tuning to 432 Hz can work, but he advised me against it, especially for larger modern grand pianos. The construction of the grand piano is very complex and tuned to individual vibrations. It could happen that the grand piano no longer sounds good at 432 Hz. It would also mean that after retuning to 432 Hz you would have to retune it very frequently, as it would take a long time for the new tuning to be held by the strings. - So, a lot of work, cost and risk for a high-quality instrument. But if I had an old upright piano standing around, I would give it a try. :)
@@mgpiano I completely understand why tuning a modern piano and especially a grand to 432hz would be counter productive. They were definitely made with specific tunings in mind and I can see how going against that would be difficult and not worth it in many ways. And yes I agree with you that tuning an old upright to 432hz would definitely be cool and perfectly fitting!
@@agustinresendiz5745 Thank you, that's the point! :)
I could barely feel the different tuning on this. Apart of that, nice track, I find myself humming a beautiful melody over your piano base. 🙂 Reminds me of "identities" from vision divine somehow
432 musica al top ...meravigliosa ,sprigiona emozioni dal cuore soave all'orecchio ...grazie ..🙏
A very interesting comparison! And the performance was wonderful and I listened to it. very!🥰
thank you!
440 felt powerful, literally grabbed me. I could hear and feel the emotion. 432 felt hollow and safe. Like a soft landing. Less jarring than 440, empty. I can feel the difference, and I think I'd prefer the stress of a good song, nice and loud 440hz, to hear and feel every tone, esp while exercising.
Atleast this song on this instrument. The 432 is more appealing. The 440 kinda made me feel uneasy and uninterested so i skipped through most of that section, but i listened to the full 432 section. The tone better represented the song i think. Calming
Thank you Thank you for showing the difference so brilliantly😊
432 definitely has a softer quality. 440 is kind of piercing in it's clarity.
Both are beautiful.
440Hz is deep, deep sadness.
Suffering that cannot be escaped.
432hz isn't just for sadness.
I feel strength and passion to Face Suffering.
Thank you!! 😊
Ohhh boy, i love piano, what a treat you are 💜💜💜💎💎💎
Thank you for sharing this. Both were nice, but yes, I can feel 432 is softer and more calming.
The conversion was perfect. Don't hear any artefacts. May I ask how you did the conversion? Wondering if you have the piano itself tuned to 432, I believe it will sound even better. 440 is definitely edgy and more "distant", but familiar. 432 is like experiencing 20/20 vision after decades of the familiar slightly blurry vision. You can now stream music in 432 using vst and Audirvana. I use Elastique vst, and Qobuz.
Thank you, ... it was just a digital pitching in Logic Express. But of course there is some loss of quality with the pitch..
Tolles Experiment. Wenn man nur 432 ohne Vergleich hört, merkt man keinen Unterschied. Durch die Umrechnung mag die Qualität etwas leiden, aber rein die Tonhöhe würde ich glaube ich 432 bevorzugen. Es klingt etwas interessanter.
closing eyes and listenng to both intro's it is crystal clear which one brings you instant inner peace...
Schöner Vergleich, danke dafür. Finde beide Versionen gut. Die 440 Hz hat für mich in einigen Passagen etwas mehr Brillianz, dafür aber auch einen etwas härteren Klang. Die 432 Hz hört sich weicher und runder an. Mir persönlich fehlt bei der 432 Hz etwas.
Very interesting observations! I've been streaming in 432 and sometimes 440. What I miss in 432 is the familiarity of 440 ( decades listening to it), the edginess. But 432 is like experiencing 20/20 vision after a life long slightly blurry vision ( the familiar)
Sehr schön. Jede Variante für sich. 440Hz klingt klarer aber auch etwas härter. 432Hz ist schmeichelnder, weicher aber auch etwas flacher.
Dankeschön! 🙏 Ich nehme es genauso wahr… 🍀🍀🍀
@@mgpiano ❤ ... kam gerade nochmal in mein Bewusstsein zurück das Thema.
440Hz assoziiere ich mit kristallin, Bergkristall bis Diamant.
432Hz tatsächlich organisch, Wachstum.
Hat der japan. Wissenschaftler, der die Wasserkristalle sichtbar macht, eigentlich auch mal Bilder gezeigt von Wasser, bespielt mit diesen beiden unterschiedlichen Frequenzen?
Very great playing and song. I liked both. I don't have perfect pitch to compare. If you don't tell me I don't know. Very emotional, thanks for sharing
Perfect pitch is something else
I’m a concert level piano technician and with 47 years experience, and a designer soundboards. I’m not a troll, nor a hater of this. I will add that pianos are designed with scales (tension,etc.) to sound best at a certain pitch. Bosendorfers, for example, are recommended by the factory to be tuned to A443. When tuned at the recommended pitch (as they were designed) the sound “pops”, lacking a better term. When I’ve tuned pianos for clients that want A432 I’ve found that the sound isn’t as vibrant as the board and scale needs. Some clients seem to like 432, but many immediately ask me to tune it back to A440. There is also a trend to tune to A444. Again, if a piano wasn’t designed for A440 this changes things drastically. I hope my comments aren’t taken as trolling, but before people start asking their tuner to drop the piano to 432 please don’t think this is some sort of magical pitch. Pianos “like” certain tensions and not all pianos will sound well at a pitch they weren’t designed for.
Thank you very much for your detailed feedback and for sharing your experience with us. Of course you are not a troll! :D Just as you explain, my piano tuner also advised me against tuning this piano to 432. He was very sure that it would not sound any better. Glad to hear other experienced people like you confirm this. There are so many aspects that determine the sound, the frequency alone is not it either. ... That Bösendorfer recommends 443 Hz is really interesting. Unfortunately, I have never played one. :)
A clear difference - the instrument sounds less stressed at 432 Hz. But I have to wonder how realistic the digital reprocessing to 432 Hz is. Accurate simulation of a piano re-tuning is extremely complex and difficult.
Also, my GX-6 sounds sweeter and less harsh than yours even though it's tuned to 440 Hz. I cannot get such a strident quality from mine, even at fortissimo.
I get shivers sometimes with 432 in the back of the head. More so than the 440.
I tried to listen with my heart, it turns out there is a striking difference between the two. thank you my friend 🙏
you're welcome!
It is cool that on my Clavinova I can tune not just the piano but every instrument found in the CVP to 432 or 440 or up or down from there. It is easy to do as well.
I prefer 440Hz 👍
Indeed, I found the 432Hz mote touching. Thank you for the wonderful example.
Literately no difference. You hear the difference because you heard the 440hz version then 432hz so it sounds slightly out of tuned.
the difference between the two frequencies is very noticeable. I always thought that 440 was more suitable for tuning electronic instruments.
Musician/Composer here. I find A432 more aligned to my inner voice, which is to say that the sense of it sits well within my voice. Therefore, and since Music itself is first and foremost of a vocal conception, it would follow that A432 is more aligned to the source. But that my career as a composer has spanned 50 years, and I have never given a thought to it, I doubt that I will think all that much about it again after this. My point: I mostly hear the sounds I imagine and go from there. And, for the past two decades, I have written all my music using a piano despairingly in need of tuning. Not that I really know why beyond saying it tests my sense of pitch, do I prefer it that way. For a tuner to enter my music room and fix it would likely dismantle my world, but more my inner world of Silence versus Sound.
Thank you so much for sharing your experience with us. After so long and so much lived music, you certainly look at things differently than when you started. As you can read here in these comments alone, the "most pleasant sound" is a very personal matter. And that's a good thing too.
@@mgpiano I have found Music to be my greatest teacher. Essentially, where through Love I learned about Creation and through creating did I experience Love, has it all been a journey of spirit. Everything, as I perceive it, is of the one vibration. Blessings, Markus!
Перенастройка фортепьяно в 432 Гц - это, безусловно, лучший и более естественный способ получить нужное звучание! Тембр и резонансы инструмента будут более точными, поскольку фортепьяно изначально настроено в нужной частоте.
Перенастроить фортепьяно - это лучше для качества записи.
Использовать цифровое изменение частоты - это проще и быстрее, но с заметной потерей качества.
Si, la differenza è abissale!
Il suono 432 hz è armonico e dona una stare di benessere generale, mentre il suono 440 hz lo percepisco come se avessi attorno un calabrone che vuole pungere.
Il 432 è armonia pura e il 440 è il suo opposto.
Grazie per l’interpretazione accurata! 🙏💜
beautiful music and talented performer 😊 now the question I have is the following: since detuning A4 from 440 to 432 Hz and then tuning the other 87 keys in relation to A4 lowers each note of the piano by approx 1/3 semitone, how would we appreciate the same song played on A440 but transposed 1 semitone lower would we feel the same improvement in terms of richness and melancholic appreciation as many have reported ?😊
I would say every transposing changes the whole sound significantly as the tuning of the 88 keys is not "linear thing". also playing a simple song in another key makes a big difference.
i like the old 435Hz european standard,, not as heavy as 432Hz but not as high as 440Hz.. I find I do not like vocals at 440-442Hz.. greatly prefer 435Hz. THat 20 cents shift from 440Hz to 435Hz makes dramatic opera sound warmer and smoother. Especailly modern 442Hz on Verdi and Puccini grate my ears..
That‘s an interesting experience. Maybe I should try to make a video with 435 Hz... 👍
Wow, ya, I would like to hear this in 435 to see what he's talking about. Your playing almost brings tears to my eyes. Just so beautiful!
@@greatnationnow thank you so much for your words. 🙏
That‘s a good idea... I can make a comparison of 440, 435 and 432 Hz with one of the new recordings from last weekend. On these the piano is freshly tuned... 💪
iam at the 440 Version.. - that makes me to feel the music at my hand on the piano feeling also listening with my ears, body and mind.. that makes me sing.. earlier or later *gg* -- also the 440 hz as the Base Sound ist Grounded and Fully Based.. thats my mind.. Thank you For ! 440
WoW! Thank you!!
The real comparison would be if the pitch was not converted digitally, but if it were a real piano tuned at 432 Hz.
Here, the 432 sounds to me like an old cassette, which is dragged a bit by the tape recorder...
Yes, for that you need two similar pianos, each tuned to the spcific frequency… but I‘m glad two have one at least, which sounds great with 440 Hz… 😊
I listened blind, didn't watch the video till after listening so I didn't trick myself. 440 I could hear some of the notes clearer but at 432 it was softer although I'm unsure it digitally reprocessing it could change the quality. I've listened to other 432hz and preferred them but with this I'm not totally sure.
I play guitar. I have found by using 432 for long time will set me in a calm space. Not an hour or even a day.I tried a couple of weeks. Denny the 440 during that time. When you change back, let me know your feelings about it. I have also used 438. It has a similar affect
432 was a purer and gentler sound. more natural. i felt and even heard the difference.
The 432hz overall sound is good, however something is lost in the melody and hits me wrong at points. The 440hz notes a crisp and hit at the right places. It may be because the 432 is digitally processed changing the playing technique.
The music was beautiful! Both versions. But it's true the 440hz is harsher and more agitating. Where as the 432hz is wonderfully warm and peaceful, even when you got to the more dramatic parts. I think 432 hz might make a big difference in emotional impact. More pleasant. I think I will have my Piano turned to 432hz also. Thanks very much.
Please more. Thank... LG Ivo
Vielen Dank, lieber Ivo. :) Weitere Videos sollten zwischen den Jahren kommen...
432 calms your heart
Both performances are acceptable to me, not looking at the keys being played. The 432 does sound a bit more relaxing actually, so I would have to agree with a lot of the comments here in that regard. Since I have perfect pitch, watching his hands playing in 440 was driving me a little nuts listening to it in 432. However, that being said, and this goes out to anyone putting out a piano performance in this platform or anywhere else, make sure you get the piano tuned beforehand. The fact that the piano here is so wretchedly out of tune is absolutely unforgivable. I'm a recording engineer, FOH engineer, sound system engineer, a keyboard musician of 65 years and a piano tuner. I can't even begin to say how many piano performances I've heard that could have been just wonderful had the piano been in tune!
Yes, you‘re right, the piano wasn‘t tuned before the recording and I also don‘t have pro recording equipment. But please don‘t take it so serious. It‘s not a scientific experiment, just a little fun experiment on a hobby channel. Because of my main job I have so less time for my piano and just used a good moment to record something, nothing else… My respect for your perfect pitch, I admire that! 👍 On my last two videos the piano was tuned the day before. Maybe better for your professional ears. 😉
@@mgpiano this was a really cool experiment, you're very talented and you played a beautiful song. I think it's one of the most worthwhile videos I've ever seen on the internet, and I'm an old coot 🙂👍
@@jakevendrotti1496 thank you very much!! 🍀
Olá. Vou tocar igual a você esta linda música!!!!❤👍👍👍🤗☝️
Parabéns pela sua maravilhosa e linda apresentação!!!
muito obrigado! 😇
Sembrano due canzoni completamente diverse. Comunque una bella composizione. Complimenti 👏👏
432 Hz feels like a warm sunlight in the early morning hours, while 440 Hz burns brightly similar to midday
440 Hz ist wesentlich kraftvoller , ich denke für Chillout oder Meditationsmusik kann 432Hz besser klingen. Bei diesem Stück finde ich beide Varianten sehr schön. Ich kann nicht sagen was mir besser gefällt. Allerdings glaube ich das bei Genres wie Techno, House oder oder härterer Rockmusik sowie auch Metall 432 Hz eher kontraproduktiv ist. Das ist alles auch etwas Esoterisch was hier reininterpretiert wird. Herbert von Karajan verwendete bei den Berliner Philharmonikern 445Hz,in anderen Ländern wie zb Schweiz sind es 444 HZ. Bei Barock Musik wird manchmal 415 HZ verwendet ,da ist dann der Kammerton A fast einen Halbton tiefer wie bei 440 HZ. Ich sag es mal so 432 HZ finde ich friedvoller oder sanfter. 440 HZ kraftvoller.
Ja, das kann man so sagen. Und interessant, dass die Frequenz so ein riesen Thema ist, war mit garnicht so bewusst. LG 😊
Sehr interessant. Doch meines Erachtens hinkt der Vergleich etwas, da digital processed anders klingt als tatsächlich auf 432 Hz gestimmt 😊
Ja, ich weiß. Aber mit dieser wissenschaftlichen Härte hier hatte ich auch nicht gerechnet… 😂
432 captivates a part of my soul in a way that 440 does not. If I was singing along it would have to be about something profound where 440 felt more mundane in comparison.
Very interesting - definitely a difference - much easier to listen to !
432 feels good and balance. 440 i feel stressed
Didn't feel any difference, but you can definitely hear a difference. I am fine with both honestly.
440 sounds superior, 432 was slightly subdued and almost a little muffled, but the song was well played, Bravo 👏
Thank you 😊
You said it mate! Nothing beats 440!
Скажите пожалуйста, что это за музыка? Как ее можно найти?
Now begs the question, why was 440 made standard and who did it!?
Very interesting you may find!
Couldn't a 440hz-tuned piano get a similar effect by using some kind of minor scale, or playing at a lower area or octave?
440hz sounds crisper, or brighter might the better descriptor, while 432hz gives a more mellow & hollow, almost somber or depressed emotion to the piece. I'm not sure which I prefer. Which felt better for you to play? idk, maybe 432hz is a new fad? Sometimes 432hz sounds ugly to me from some other comparison videos I've heard here on youtube.
My ears really love the 432 hz version more. Could listen to it for hours
Barok dönemde LA = 415 miş. Giderek daha güçlü ve sivri sesler duymak için frekans arttırılmış. 432 de bu artış durdurulmalıymış. Kulak daha tize alışınca düşük frekans bol elbise gibi geliyor. Aklım 440 iyi derken duygularım 432 yi seviyor.