Support me at: Buymeacoffee: buymeacoffee.com/scienceisdope Patreon: www.patreon.com/scienceisdope_ Nas IO: nas.io/scienceisdope (For joining my whatsapp community) YT Membership: ruclips.net/channel/UCg--ENXdDpXh5LyLigolg2gjoin UPI: scienceisdope@icici (QR Code available on www.scienceisdope.com/support )
@I made a comment and it got deleted with no warning (it included criticism to u ....or more like feedback to u) So I am sus on u 😡 It could be u tube banning any opinion it does not like ...or your viewers who are mostly pseudo good guys who secretly don't even care about the truth but want to justify their hatred over religion and start a cult of atheists,or it could be u
Hey Pranav am a long time viewer first time commenter and I want to know will you ever . Talk about the situation in the Sri Padmanabhaswamy temple in Kerala . Because one of the vaults can't be opened because religious officials and astrologers are going around . Claiming ng how shiva is going to destroy the universe if the vault door is opened .
@@shrey._.77sif possible, can you please name one? I would like to correct it myself too and if found he is wrong I will update my information to correct one. Thanks!
Jaggi forgets that we use the word memory for foam mattresses also. Memory foam returns to its previous shape. Surely, that isn't the same as it remembering things.
Honestly adding pictures just made it very interesting. Earlier i was reluctant to even look at the card but adding these pictures suddenly make it look very fun and im interested. Maybe i like things very visual. keep doing this pranav. I've managed to change a blind sadhguru follower to a rational person only because of your videos.
This guy is spreading a little misinformation here and there as well, at 6:21 , Erwin did say that the unity and continuity of vedanta are reflected in the unity and continuity of wave, and he is not getting political, he is getting religious targeting Hindu religion. And don`t say that "its because hindus are majority" because its not like muslims are in minority either, he is a biased critic.
Hi Pranav, lot of thanks for making such a video. I liked it very much. I would like to request you to make more videos on logical fallacies like this. Best of luck and thanks again.❤
i always wanted a video on logical fallacies you really did a great job. Hope you make a video of all the fallacies with this type of real example which is happening around us so that we can understand these things easily and clearly.
Hey Pranav! Very good initiative on creating this game! I was checking out the google doc and had an idea , could you rearrange them alphabetically? Like Terms starting from A-Z, Thank you so much for your work!
I feel that the thumbnail showing the sentence "I MADE A NEW FREE GAME" in the place of "FALLACIES AND BIASES" might get a lot of attention. May be conduct a poll.
you must have learned about fallacy till now. So please see what this guy want's to project that equivocation fallacy used by Sadhguru is actually He didn't please read what actually equivocation fallacy mean.
@@scienceisdope Bro you're doing them the jjjack films treatment, I guess you came up to the idea your self but that kinda copping but still cool I just watched the video, should've commented later but still pretty sick
@@manvendramama hinduism doesn't allow to have your own philosophy if it is not canonical to all the scriptures If I borrow your concept It's still your concept Not yours Advaita is forever entitled to hinduism and shankracharya alone Never to acharya Prashant or anyone If Prashant opposes shankracharya (I don't watch his lectures) It is not Advaita
@@manvendramama whatever I have said is a complete opinion of every single advaitin preacher Philosophy is only accepted if it is able to consistently explain everything written in hindu scriptures You can question the interpreter Not the text
I want you to make a video on all the fallacies you know because it's very interesting for me to know about new fallacies, so I want that you can make a video on all the fallacies you know and describing them❤
Can you please make a video explaining each of the fallacies and biases which you name? Honestly there are so many, with little differences between them, it makes it difficult to differentiate between them. Can there be a guide for this?
Bro what is this water has memory, each and every cell in our body has memory as we are the beings of our past generations and I didn't understand what wrong he said
Can't we make an AI which detects any logical fallacy in a given input data (subtitles or audio transcript) ? I know it will not be 100% accurate or precise. But still a good way to tackle mis/dis information.
Hey Pranav, could you please do a video on Dr. Vandana Shiva, she's a woman who with her degree in philosophy of physics claims to he a physicist and is against GMOs in plants. She has gotten a lot of fame even on reputed platforms like Democracy now and TedX when she's literally against the green revolution
@msrsculpts8179according to religion 😂 they always wait for science to discover 😜 something only then they can claim on it shoes who's supreme and who's cucksucker 😂
Finally found the best RUclips channel ever ❤ Iam muslim ( in past ) when I was searching about this topic ( science and religion) some Muslims has their own conspiracy theory about science and religion And some people who completely against Muslims and pro Hindu telling Islam is not science and hinduism is that true religion. But you are amazing ❤ My English is so bad sorry for that 😢 I wiil copy this comment and post it in every video as possible ❤ (I don’t pray or believe in god but i follow the humanity)
Pranav i don't think using fallacies every single time when u have to argue about something sounds less like you proving something and more like u suppressing the other person to even speak by mentioning something they dont even know Its belittling in a way And plz dont follow the jacksfilms way dude was so hungry for attention he made a whole channel about sniper wolf content and did the same thing he critizes her for U can do better man
@msrsculpts8179not really...those are some stupid scientists , Because we did not have solid proof of back holes,Dark matter ,now we know they exist visually....we also think their is dark energy , but we don't have proof yet We can't prove universe exists as it does not make full sense ....but we know universe exists
@msrsculpts8179meanwhile science proving everything so religion 😂 can claim we know that before 😂 teri kya gand jali hain har jagah yehi comment kr rha hain 😂
I think if people invest more time in exploring yoga & helpful teachings by sadhguru could get some life changing benefits instead of coming to a conclusion & proving this wrong that wrong😂😂
I dont agree with this way of learning from textbooks about logic and fallacies, firstly if truth (which it self can be a complicated concept) could be discovered by reading books, then everyone would have the same opinions, but its not because written logic are not enough, there are more variables like the nature of contents and contents itself, the nature of nouns, creation of indvidualistic concepts and subjective opinons, and priorities. The best way of being a reletively intelligent person who has its own way of thinking and making their opinions is, first be born as at least decently intelligent person, then be incredibley honest and open minded, understand the limilations of language, nouns and categories, learn to observe first hand deeply and complexly and develope ur own way of thinking and create ur own labels, defination and categories. The only thing the written way of how to think does is: close the doors of mind for develop individualistic way of thinking, it also make same minded closed groups who have arrogance. Remember, we all are subject of Ultimate Reality, we didnt created our self, the outside world, our consiousness, and ability of understand
The video is not about "finding the truth", but rather "finding the illogical points" in some claims. Logical fallacy is a tool which we can use to have honest, clear conversation, not about finding the absolute truth. Your comment itself is a series of premises that develops logically so that you can present your argument (A because B then C) You used logic yourself to rationalise your position.
@@mithilbhoras5951 i didnt say logic is not important, i said just teaching written logic for understanding world is not good approach as i said clearly "written logic are not enough", and by this im saying first hand observation is better for developing individualistic deep observational skills and coming up with original ideas, than reading written logic, and that itself is not enough as i said. Also i was not talking about absolute truth, normal world level truth are itself complicated if it werent everyone would have same opinions
@@sai_neko_reddyI agree , even when I am winning I feel like...."maybe I a wrong , I am not letting the other guy speak ,it feels like my stomach is churning a bit , I feel uncomfortable,this feels unfair '' Which is why I have found the fuqing epitome of U.N.O reverse , the root of all this problem getting removed Introducing!!! 1) Meta - fallacy : randomly accusing peole of using logical fallacies even if they are not / failing to explain why they used a fallacy 2) fallacy fallacy : just because someone is using a fallacy ,does not mean they are wrong
No it's not because it's liberal right wing hindu who claim that there's place fro everyone in their religion 😂 without caring for traditional Hinduism it's not his fault lol
Jaggi is mixes truth with lies. I have seen him show extreme emotions like angry and happiness too many times which are not qualities of a yogi good enough to be guru. He copies many things from osho. Through i do believe he is helping many through his work as its not pure poison and we have yet to see any drugs and sexual scams thankfully. He has taken the good/useful things from osho. But he likes to preach stories of gods at the same time likes to flaunt that he has not read any scripture and hasn’t read samskrit.
Pranav sir, umm I think there's a clip of you on the learning material of byju's explaining what a female condom is. (Street interview style) Is that really you or a look alike?
Bro I have a question regd all these fallacies. You are ultimately saying, if there is no evidence to a statement, we don't make a conclusion from it. But do you think, humans are capable enough or maybe not interested enough or even thought to do a research/study on each topic? We need to also consider whether the lack of evidence is due to 1. not even doing a study 2. not doing enough study 3. no evidence even after enough study and we are sure that no evidence can be found in future on doing even deeper studies Only in case of 3rd scenario, we can conclude that because there is no evidence, the statement is false, in all other case, it's always can't be said. Also, how much can we trust the current technology because any numbers we get to produce a statistical evidence using any scientific tool may have some errors or may not include all other factors which might be required to be considered but we don't know that based on the given statement due to missing details.
this is so subjective. As fallacies are objectively subjective means you can justify anything by your anology if you name your fallacy somewhat correctly. This can be a valid criticism but we need more context here. in third point, how can you be so sure without any leading evidence that you will find some in the future even after studying it thoroughly? It needs an appeal to something, whether bias towards it or because the authority is forcing you to, for instance, look at the making of department of ayush, CCRAS, ethics commitee for ayurveda, etc. They all have received funds to do research and institutes like e Central Institute for Research in Indigenous System of Medicine (CIRISM), the first Ayurveda research institute of India since 1952 and yet the most research they have done till now lacks matter and evidence. They still get funds even today in 2023 why?
"Water memory is an example of pseudoscience and contradicts the scientific understanding of physical chemistry and is generally not accepted by the scientific community"
Hey I'm a big fan of yours. I want you to make an informative video on cancer in poultry and animals that give us red meat and its health consequences on the consumer. Another favourite youtuber of mine called Peepal Farm who's known for his altruistic journalism and concern for animals made a claim that we are risking Getting cancer by eating non vegetarian food which might have cancer or tumours. A Google search didn't give me solid data. Also I don't have the reach to raise awareness among people.Maybe you can talk to some expert for clarification as you generally do on your channel. I'm concerned because poultry is a cheap source of protein for many but there are many stigmas associated with Cancer and flus , while it's said that if properly cooked, it's safe to consume. Also give insights on redundant use of antibiotics in poultry and livestock industries, and its impact on humans and animals. I'll drop the link of the RUclips video by peepal farm in this thread.
@scienceisdope People misuse fallacies all the time Their are 2 additional fallacies like 1) meta - fallacy - randomly claiming others of using fallacies when they r not / not providing proper explanation for what they are using 2) fallacy fallacy - just because someone uses logical fallacy , does not mean his claim is wrong Such as 2+2= 4 because smart people said so , this is appeal to authority , but 2+2= 4 Fallacies are almost always objectively subjective ,this means that if u r trying to give someone an example he can randomly say "false analogy , or straw man" Which is not even true , The other person can simply ask "I dont think u r giving a good example / I think your original statement was correct " "Appear to authority" - just because a smart person said something does not make it a must be true statement , but it still has some weight age Logical fallacy don't always mean that the other persons argument is wrong ,it mostly means that the other persons argument is not good enough to make a strong judgment,but it definitely makes a difference Whataboutery - this can be a solid argument in case of self defense /r e venge or it might be used to (outside the argument )show the bias of the narrator When u show the comments of your channel in the video that is NOT WHATABOUTISM they are just claiming u r biased Imagine making a statement that u don't realise is wrong and someone says "you made a Strawman fallacy'' just like u did to that guy in comments , bro that is not even straw man fallacy ,if that us straw man fallacy , then Go damn everything is a fallacy , that was just a false statement,u can Simply tell him why he is wrong People who use logical fallacies are a lot of times people who learn it from somewhere and just copy it word to word I have so much more to say ...but I forgot about it ....I will add later after re watching the video How do u manage to make so many mistakes in such a normal and short video ? Do u really wonder why people hate u ,after clearly making so many mistakes Do u really thing u r a "GOOD GUY" Don't say "everyone makes mistakes '' no they don't....plus that is whataboutism Give me an opportunity to make video ,i will make EXACTLY 0 mistakes "Non biased" "Care about the truth " Because I want to clarify it is not completely bad. here are some good things about the video : u clarified ad hominem =\= insults U clarified that u don't need to know name anf meaninf of logical fallacies if u r already a rational person
@@tathagatquandaliusganesh1082I am probably be banned But it is an appeal to authority because I said " because smart people said so , smart people saying something means that 2+2=4 is a fallacy , but 2+2=4 is not a fallacy
@@rahulram9406it does have evidences as mostly indus site are found near a place where people say sarawati river used to flow as at that time people used to establish civilization near side of the river
Sadhguru makes these kind of content. It is because these kind of content is what worked out for him. To be a salesman is tough. You have to make them purchase your product whatever it is. Its his traits that helped him get there. He had a soothing sound and he was proficient in English.Hen business was not successful. There is a saying by Charlie munger, if you get an opportunity, don't ever let go of it, grab it with your life. People believe him because people wants to hear his bulshit. They want to be misled. There will be the misleading people and those who are misled, there will also people who show that you have been misled. The misleading people and those who show they have been misled are in sympiotic relationships. It is a win-win situation. But the consumers of the videos are fu*cked. They are using valuable time. It is like a pump and dump scheme. People who get dumped call it a scam and go to people influencers that tell them that the person who dumped them was a scammer. Same goes for sadguru. Blind belief is not Sadhguru fault. Blind belief is publics fault. Anyone can advice, it is upto you to believe them or not.
it's so sad that none of the guys that you've called out have responded in the comment section ever...I follow Tom Nicholas on here, and whoever he has called out has been responsible enough to reply in the comment section which he has responded to and pinned. These guys are so shallow that they don't even have the courage to do that! Shameful
True....let us see hiw it turns out (I don't have my hooes high , when Jacks does it , he did not do it about controversial and serious thing , it was related to a pathetic girl who wanted attention )
I was not getting notification of your new videos, also I am banned your reddit sub, so wasn't aware of new videos. I will try the game. Thanks for explaining the fallacies. I recently became agnostic. Slowly killing the religious man inside me. I hated you when you made a video on Praveen Mohan, but slowly I started listening to you and found i was ignorant.
@@SameersQuestForGod8 debate where I am busy for months may be in jan it's year end work will be more I hardly get time I think it can't be in 5-10 minutes mean while choose topic for debate I make you clear with my views I believe in both science and religion I think religion and God is beyond science so in which topic you want to debate you should know that in advance if you fail to answer any questions in topic u have choosed I quit the debate and claim that you have ignorance fallacy I am studying in Hindu logical science nyaya darshan and vaisesika darshan so think before you debate if you cannot answer ignorance fallacy
@@SameersQuestForGod8 if you want to have debate before date I can connect with my nyaya darshan professor but I am not responsible if u cannot answer him he use logic for everything if you don't I could help in both point urs and mine but don't expect this from my professor five minutes enough for him to disprove your concept don't blame me later if u want to debate with me should wait till jan
@@SameersQuestForGod8 it's not cake walk to debate with Hindus and traditional Buddhists you can only fight in RUclips in reality you cannot stand in front of them do you think they studied logic for 12 -16 years they don't know logic
@@SameersQuestForGod8 if you so curious for debate choose topic if u so curious I connect this Sunday to my Buddhists friend ask him science if say ur not in reality and proves the same from logic I am not responsible think and choose the topic I forward it to right person don't expect Buddhists to answer the question he might use Just logic to know Buddhists logic once I asked him do god exists he Just used logic to prove existence of God later said follow text experience is required so choose topic correctly I forward to right person
Being fan of a text is solely upon individual. You can be an atheist and love the scriptures as a text. The same as I am an atheist and I am a fan of marvel comics.
As an ex Pranav hater, I have a little advice for Pranav: The amout of hate comments will drastically reduce if he be a bit respectful towards people's religious sentiments. Just like in Acharya Prashant's videos, he is against all superstitions but at the same time he also tells that this superstition is not spirituality. Real spirituality is something else. This way people perceive that this superstition is like a weed in spirituality that needs to be removed. But the way Pranav speaks sometimes implies like the religion is wrong in some aspects. Which hurts people's feelings. And instead of agreeing, they get even more defensive and believe even more in the superstitions. According to me, 80% of Sadhguru is extremely wise and rest 20% of him is filled with bullshit facts that he read somewhere and didn't confirm (due to his bias) if the source is right or not.
I am not saying to continue tradition. But I am saying that when we debunk the superstitions, it looks like we are targeting the religion. Instead tell people that this is not your spirituality. "Playing with colours on holi, bursting crackers on diwali or tying a thread on raksha bandhan is not spirituality. Knowing yourself and knowing the truth is." -Acharya Prashant. What I am saying is that people confuse tradition with spirituality and feel hurt when we debunk the tradition.
After all this I came to the conclusion that: Religion ☯️ created for: 🎉 Respect: out of respect PPL start follow good PPL and that become religion at some point. Like : followers of channel are also kind of same ... In very small ⚖️ scale 🎉Unity: stop fighting and make them 🤔 think in the same way 🎉 Guidelines: to provide guidance how to live , what to do n what 🚫 not 🎉 Focused: beleive in something one so that PPL don't waste time to explore every thing and not doing daily work . 🎉 Faith 🙏: PPL want something on which they can believe 🙏 and ask for help when in trouble And it really works coz PPL get positivity when they think ... God will help them just keep doing. And many other aspects fulfilled by religion. So being in a group is better even when there are lots of non scientific concepts Are there just to feel PPL satisfied coz satisfaction 😂 is the biggest thing, if u have that u are good in every situation. Buy yes smart PPL are using it to fool normal ppl and taking advantage. That's very normal thing. In every field smart make fool other not so smart .
@@udhayveersingh1855u don't need shoes for running , u don't need gym to build muscles , u don't need practice to be good at mathematics..but it definitely helps Look at India, China , Rome , Ottoman empire etc ,they were all built on religion and co existed every and any thing can be used to make people hate each other "Black vs white" "Men vs womem" "Straight vs trans" "Muslims vs Hindu" "Muslims vs Christian" "Muslims vs Jew" "Young people vs old people' A lot of people fight in name of countries...should country be banned People fight in name of food and wafer...should be ban food and water People fight for race Should we only let people of 1 race exist ?
@msrsculpts8179 no, no one says this . And you don't need to be a scientist to ask why when and how. If u don't know something that doesn't mean whatever I will say will be ultimate truth. Same goes for religion or scientist both, if they can't prove it then it will remain just theory.
@msrsculpts8179that is a valid point , science can not , so we should probably try to make educated guesses , a lot of guesses by religion makes a lot of sense so I support them U have proven your point , I agree with u , I thought u meant something else ,sorry
@@GoDEmon-xe1ve guess is guess. Without any proof it's guess or theory. So don't believe on it. Weather done by scientist or any religion. But ppl are believing in it even when we know it's just theory or story or hypothesis.
Support me at:
Buymeacoffee: buymeacoffee.com/scienceisdope
Patreon: www.patreon.com/scienceisdope_
Nas IO: nas.io/scienceisdope (For joining my whatsapp community)
YT Membership: ruclips.net/channel/UCg--ENXdDpXh5LyLigolg2gjoin
UPI: scienceisdope@icici (QR Code available on www.scienceisdope.com/support )
@I made a comment and it got deleted with no warning (it included criticism to u ....or more like feedback to u)
So I am sus on u 😡
It could be u tube banning any opinion it does not like ...or your viewers who are mostly pseudo good guys who secretly don't even care about the truth but want to justify their hatred over religion and start a cult of atheists,or it could be u
So... you finally uploaded this on the main Channel.
Hey Pranav am a long time viewer first time commenter and I want to know will you ever . Talk about the situation in the Sri Padmanabhaswamy temple in Kerala . Because one of the vaults can't be opened because religious officials and astrologers are going around . Claiming ng how shiva is going to destroy the universe if the vault door is opened .
Did you use new camera vid quality looks good?
I will not buy you a coffee. But I would like to send you an important text regarding consciousness and the idea of unity. Where should I send you?
This channel does a hell of a job of exposing misinformation without becoming too political
Not sure if this is genuine or sarcasm 😅😂
@@akarshiaaryan5952 Genuine
@@akarshiaaryan5952why would it be sarcasm?
@@shrey._.77s I have yet to notice Pranav do this. Those who claim this have an agenda
@@shrey._.77sif possible, can you please name one? I would like to correct it myself too and if found he is wrong I will update my information to correct one. Thanks!
Jaggi forgets that we use the word memory for foam mattresses also. Memory foam returns to its previous shape. Surely, that isn't the same as it remembering things.
😂😂😂
but he is jaggi so can we really argue tho ? 😂😂😂😂 Imagine we argue with him he will say " close your eye " or "dimension dimension
dimension "
@msrsculpts8179according to faith, anything that can't be proven does exist
Don't give him ideas
@msrsculpts8179according to religion monkey 🐒 eat sun, Muhammad 🐖 fly on donkey Jesus😺 walk on water
Honestly adding pictures just made it very interesting. Earlier i was reluctant to even look at the card but adding these pictures suddenly make it look very fun and im interested. Maybe i like things very visual. keep doing this pranav. I've managed to change a blind sadhguru follower to a rational person only because of your videos.
Irony is that before watching this video there was an ad from Isha Foundation 🤣
😂😂😂😂😂
@ServantofKrishna-yx8yf Unicorns live in ur pants
this is gonna be super fun , cant wait to play this game.
Best comedian awars goes to brainless pranav radha krishnan
Bhai gussa mat ho,let it go
This guy is spreading a little misinformation here and there as well, at 6:21 , Erwin did say that the unity and continuity of vedanta are reflected in the unity and continuity of wave, and he is not getting political, he is getting religious targeting Hindu religion. And don`t say that "its because hindus are majority" because its not like muslims are in minority either, he is a biased critic.
Love the coloring in BG and thanks for the game😂
Hi Pranav, lot of thanks for making such a video. I liked it very much. I would like to request you to make more videos on logical fallacies like this. Best of luck and thanks again.❤
Make a game on zakir Hussain and Owaisi also
i always wanted a video on logical fallacies you really did a great job. Hope you make a video of all the fallacies with this type of real example which is happening around us so that we can understand these things easily and clearly.
It's really great pranav 🙌 thanks for sharing the pdf
I m learning my own fallacies i generally use
Thanks 👍 again
Thank you so much for this video. This is super useful ❤❤
The perfect and complete video I wanted since I came to know about fallacy. Thanks bro.
Keep up the good work 🔥
Bro's doing jjjake films treatment to them
@msrsculpts8179 anything science is unable to prove can exist but just cant certainly say it exists or not
Play any video of jaggi.
Take a shot of vodka everytime he says "fundamental"
Should be a fun game.
i don't want him to die from alcohol overdose
@ServantofKrishna-yx8yf What exactly do you mean by GOD? One that is in your Profile Picture? Or something else?
Hey Pranav! Very good initiative on creating this game! I was checking out the google doc and had an idea , could you rearrange them alphabetically? Like Terms starting from A-Z, Thank you so much for your work!
I feel that the thumbnail showing the sentence "I MADE A NEW FREE GAME" in the place of "FALLACIES AND BIASES" might get a lot of attention.
May be conduct a poll.
he did it
I don't know why but I feel i have something achieve when he post video.
@@manvendramama why TF you are spamming this everywhere ❔
@msrsculpts8179 again this man is back who think evolution is fake
Yes it's true you really achieved a bug mind bug.😂😂😂
Didn't know you watched jacksfilms lol. This is amazing!
This looks so fun! Thank you for putting the effort to make the bingo cards and all too, I'm gonna play this with my friends
Great job Pranav
I am happy that people in India like you exist to put some sense of scientific temperament in the future generations.
Amazing idea, Pranav! A great way to learn to think rationally!
you must have learned about fallacy till now. So please see what this guy want's to project that equivocation fallacy used by Sadhguru is actually He didn't please read what actually equivocation fallacy mean.
Wow, very innovative video. Nice work!
Thanks man!
@@scienceisdope Bro you're doing them the jjjack films treatment, I guess you came up to the idea your self but that kinda copping but still cool
I just watched the video, should've commented later but still pretty sick
@@manvendramamathere's no Advaita vedanta of Prashant
😂
It's is Advaita if shankara and you guys aren't even capable of refuting it
@@manvendramama hinduism doesn't allow to have your own philosophy if it is not canonical to all the scriptures
If I borrow your concept
It's still your concept
Not yours
Advaita is forever entitled to hinduism and shankracharya alone
Never to acharya Prashant or anyone
If Prashant opposes shankracharya (I don't watch his lectures)
It is not Advaita
@@manvendramama whatever I have said is a complete opinion of every single advaitin preacher
Philosophy is only accepted if it is able to consistently explain everything written in hindu scriptures
You can question the interpreter
Not the text
I want you to make a video on all the fallacies you know because it's very interesting for me to know about new fallacies, so I want that you can make a video on all the fallacies you know and describing them❤
This is such a great resource for teaching, thank you!!!
I wish this video was available in Hindi. Maybe you could try using an AI tool to do that?
Can you please make a video explaining each of the fallacies and biases which you name? Honestly there are so many, with little differences between them, it makes it difficult to differentiate between them. Can there be a guide for this?
Same
+1
@Allinoneanime-fj5tzsaw it, thank you. He needs to highlight it more though. That being said, a video will be more helpful reach wise.
You can read about all the fallacies here
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
@@itsoblivion8124 we want pranav's explaination
Bro what is this water has memory, each and every cell in our body has memory as we are the beings of our past generations and I didn't understand what wrong he said
Hi we can try this game on fit tuner's video on Hindu rituals ,if possible?
The dimension guy never stops spitting bs to prove his self proclaimed godman status.
Can't we make an AI which detects any logical fallacy in a given input data (subtitles or audio transcript) ? I know it will not be 100% accurate or precise. But still a good way to tackle mis/dis information.
Hi Pranav,
Where we can get articles to read about any subject for free. Or to which domain we can get more stuffs to learn.
This was much needed!! 🙌🙌
Hey Pranav, could you please do a video on Dr. Vandana Shiva, she's a woman who with her degree in philosophy of physics claims to he a physicist and is against GMOs in plants. She has gotten a lot of fame even on reputed platforms like Democracy now and TedX when she's literally against the green revolution
10:22,Most funny part,Knowledge of Brahmin Texts😂😂😂
@msrsculpts8179according to religion 😂 they always wait for science to discover 😜 something only then they can claim on it shoes who's supreme and who's cucksucker 😂
Guide book for scepticism 🙌
Finally found the best RUclips channel ever ❤
Iam muslim ( in past ) when I was searching about this topic ( science and religion) some Muslims has their own conspiracy theory about science and religion
And some people who completely against Muslims and pro Hindu telling Islam is not science and hinduism is that true religion.
But you are amazing ❤
My English is so bad sorry for that 😢
I wiil copy this comment and post it in every video as possible ❤
(I don’t pray or believe in god but i follow the humanity)
Bro science has limitations. It doesn't have an answer for many things.
Why don't you include those rice bag conversions chutzpah ?
They will kill him n that's why
Pranav i don't think using fallacies every single time when u have to argue about something sounds less like you proving something and more like u suppressing the other person to even speak by mentioning something they dont even know
Its belittling in a way
And plz dont follow the jacksfilms way dude was so hungry for attention he made a whole channel about sniper wolf content and did the same thing he critizes her for
U can do better man
Sir Make A video on environment and phatakhas , delhi air pollution and car bans, what makes sense and what not . thank You.
welp, JJJackfilms atleast got someone to make the Bingo card too lmfao
Super work, dude!
Next video on zakir naik or any muslim maulana plz
Whataboutry
He already made one 2 years ago.
Your channel and science journey channel are good for whole world with all languages
Brilliant!
Finally the grid is full bingo 😮
Guys you don't understand this content is gold✨
SSSNIPER WOLF WOULD LIKE TO TALK TO YOU.....
Thank you for bringing out this game! Needed in everybody's cognitive toolkit.
Intro like a fittuber video 😂😂😂
Bro made a better game ad than 99.99% of mobile game ads
You need to also talk about falsifiability. It is very important in the field of science
@msrsculpts8179not really...those are some stupid scientists , Because we did not have solid proof of back holes,Dark matter ,now we know they exist visually....we also think their is dark energy , but we don't have proof yet
We can't prove universe exists as it does not make full sense ....but we know universe exists
Metaphysics falls in this category.
Notion of multiverse is also metaphysical.
@@itsoblivion8124true ,but a lot of things accepted by scientists are metaphysical
Their no EXACT definition of metaphysics
@@binay413963 metaphysics means beyond physics or after physics
But the question comes is maths a science. I mean you can't apply falsifiability in maths.
i respect people who does religion because its decreases competition for me to become more successful
😂😂i never thought of it that way. Thank you Optimistic person
Wow.....my comment got deleted
I am going to crazy against the u tube Officials 😡
@@kovelamanas9905so did you succeed?
@msrsculpts8179meanwhile science proving everything so religion 😂 can claim we know that before 😂 teri kya gand jali hain har jagah yehi comment kr rha hain 😂
I think if people invest more time in exploring yoga & helpful teachings by sadhguru could get some life changing benefits instead of coming to a conclusion & proving this wrong that wrong😂😂
Yes definitely but we should criticise whenever he is wrong that all😂😂
Cant believe he actually took my suggestion to make next video on Sadhguru. Amazing content from amazing guy!
You talking or choking on something? 🤣🤣🤣
Sir, how to deal with these type of people?🤦..... argue or ignore?🤷
Dont bullshit urself with your sir, be alone after 3-4 days u”ll know
Ignore
I dont agree with this way of learning from textbooks about logic and fallacies, firstly if truth (which it self can be a complicated concept) could be discovered by reading books, then everyone would have the same opinions, but its not because written logic are not enough, there are more variables like the nature of contents and contents itself, the nature of nouns, creation of indvidualistic concepts and subjective opinons, and priorities.
The best way of being a reletively intelligent person who has its own way of thinking and making their opinions is, first be born as at least decently intelligent person, then be incredibley honest and open minded, understand the limilations of language, nouns and categories, learn to observe first hand deeply and complexly and develope ur own way of thinking and create ur own labels, defination and categories.
The only thing the written way of how to think does is: close the doors of mind for develop individualistic way of thinking, it also make same minded closed groups who have arrogance.
Remember, we all are subject of Ultimate Reality, we didnt created our self, the outside world, our consiousness, and ability of understand
how to be born as "atleast decently intelligent person?"
The video is not about "finding the truth", but rather "finding the illogical points" in some claims. Logical fallacy is a tool which we can use to have honest, clear conversation, not about finding the absolute truth. Your comment itself is a series of premises that develops logically so that you can present your argument (A because B then C) You used logic yourself to rationalise your position.
@@mithilbhoras5951 i didnt say logic is not important, i said just teaching written logic for understanding world is not good approach as i said clearly "written logic are not enough", and by this im saying first hand observation is better for developing individualistic deep observational skills and coming up with original ideas, than reading written logic, and that itself is not enough as i said. Also i was not talking about absolute truth, normal world level truth are itself complicated if it werent everyone would have same opinions
@@mithilbhoras5951at this point there is a fallacy for every thing and u can just say 🤓☝️it's a fallacy and not even let people talk
@@sai_neko_reddyI agree , even when I am winning I feel like...."maybe I a wrong , I am not letting the other guy speak ,it feels like my stomach is churning a bit , I feel uncomfortable,this feels unfair ''
Which is why I have found the fuqing epitome of U.N.O reverse , the root of all this problem getting removed
Introducing!!!
1) Meta - fallacy : randomly accusing peole of using logical fallacies even if they are not / failing to explain why they used a fallacy
2) fallacy fallacy : just because someone is using a fallacy ,does not mean they are wrong
@ScienceIsDope what are the three books in background. king something…
Even photos albums are memories😂😂
This is COOL! Im loving this! 🤣🤣🤣🙌✌️
Oh God Just found ur channel
What a gem!!!!
*Hey Pranav* , what's your take on Dhruv Rathee latest video, where he's calling himself a Hindu Atheist.
Isn't it contradictory?
No it's not because it's liberal right wing hindu who claim that there's place fro everyone in their religion 😂 without caring for traditional Hinduism it's not his fault lol
Jaggi is mixes truth with lies. I have seen him show extreme emotions like angry and happiness too many times which are not qualities of a yogi good enough to be guru. He copies many things from osho. Through i do believe he is helping many through his work as its not pure poison and we have yet to see any drugs and sexual scams thankfully. He has taken the good/useful things from osho. But he likes to preach stories of gods at the same time likes to flaunt that he has not read any scripture and hasn’t read samskrit.
Hey Pranav, Whenever I argue with shitpellets I tend to resort to ad hominem logical fallacy. How to control it 😅
Pranav sir, umm I think there's a clip of you on the learning material of byju's explaining what a female condom is. (Street interview style)
Is that really you or a look alike?
Bro I have a question regd all these fallacies. You are ultimately saying, if there is no evidence to a statement, we don't make a conclusion from it.
But do you think, humans are capable enough or maybe not interested enough or even thought to do a research/study on each topic?
We need to also consider whether the lack of evidence is due to
1. not even doing a study
2. not doing enough study
3. no evidence even after enough study and we are sure that no evidence can be found in future on doing even deeper studies
Only in case of 3rd scenario, we can conclude that because there is no evidence, the statement is false, in all other case, it's always can't be said.
Also, how much can we trust the current technology because any numbers we get to produce a statistical evidence using any scientific tool may have some errors or may not include all other factors which might be required to be considered but we don't know that based on the given statement due to missing details.
this is so subjective. As fallacies are objectively subjective means you can justify anything by your anology if you name your fallacy somewhat correctly. This can be a valid criticism but we need more context here.
in third point, how can you be so sure without any leading evidence that you will find some in the future even after studying it thoroughly? It needs an appeal to something, whether bias towards it or because the authority is forcing you to, for instance, look at the making of department of ayush, CCRAS, ethics commitee for ayurveda, etc. They all have received funds to do research and institutes like e Central Institute for Research in Indigenous System of Medicine (CIRISM), the first Ayurveda research institute of India since 1952 and yet the most research they have done till now lacks matter and evidence. They still get funds even today in 2023 why?
Jjjacksfilms is a legend lol
Water memory.... can you try that 3 jar rice water experiment by saying words i love u ,i hate u ,say nothing
"Water memory is an example of pseudoscience and contradicts the scientific understanding of physical chemistry and is generally not accepted by the scientific community"
Hey I'm a big fan of yours. I want you to make an informative video on cancer in poultry and animals that give us red meat and its health consequences on the consumer. Another favourite youtuber of mine called Peepal Farm who's known for his altruistic journalism and concern for animals made a claim that we are risking Getting cancer by eating non vegetarian food which might have cancer or tumours. A Google search didn't give me solid data. Also I don't have the reach to raise awareness among people.Maybe you can talk to some expert for clarification as you generally do on your channel. I'm concerned because poultry is a cheap source of protein for many but there are many stigmas associated with Cancer and flus , while it's said that if properly cooked, it's safe to consume. Also give insights on redundant use of antibiotics in poultry and livestock industries, and its impact on humans and animals. I'll drop the link of the RUclips video by peepal farm in this thread.
ruclips.net/video/oRaM_3EoMno/видео.htmlsi=cpftMKWv6tw16LDu
@scienceisdope
People misuse fallacies all the time
Their are 2 additional fallacies like
1) meta - fallacy - randomly claiming others of using fallacies when they r not / not providing proper explanation for what they are using
2) fallacy fallacy - just because someone uses logical fallacy , does not mean his claim is wrong
Such as 2+2= 4 because smart people said so , this is appeal to authority , but 2+2= 4
Fallacies are almost always objectively subjective ,this means that if u r trying to give someone an example he can randomly say "false analogy , or straw man"
Which is not even true ,
The other person can simply ask "I dont think u r giving a good example / I think your original statement was correct "
"Appear to authority" - just because a smart person said something does not make it a must be true statement , but it still has some weight age
Logical fallacy don't always mean that the other persons argument is wrong ,it mostly means that the other persons argument is not good enough to make a strong judgment,but it definitely makes a difference
Whataboutery - this can be a solid argument in case of self defense /r e venge or it might be used to (outside the argument )show the bias of the narrator
When u show the comments of your channel in the video that is NOT WHATABOUTISM they are just claiming u r biased
Imagine making a statement that u don't realise is wrong and someone says "you made a Strawman fallacy''
just like u did to that guy in comments , bro that is not even straw man fallacy ,if that us straw man fallacy , then Go damn everything is a fallacy , that was just a false statement,u can Simply tell him why he is wrong
People who use logical fallacies are a lot of times people who learn it from somewhere and just copy it word to word
I have so much more to say ...but I forgot about it ....I will add later after re watching the video
How do u manage to make so many mistakes in such a normal and short video ?
Do u really wonder why people hate u ,after clearly making so many mistakes
Do u really thing u r a "GOOD GUY"
Don't say "everyone makes mistakes ''
no they don't....plus that is whataboutism
Give me an opportunity to make video ,i will make EXACTLY 0 mistakes
"Non biased"
"Care about the truth "
Because I want to clarify it is not completely bad. here are some good things about the video : u clarified ad hominem =\= insults
U clarified that u don't need to know name anf meaninf of logical fallacies if u r already a rational person
> completely dad
is a mistake here, good boy
Who said 2+2=4 is an appeal to authority? People later axiomatised arithmetic to even prove that 2+2=4
@@tathagatquandaliusganesh1082I am probably be banned
But it is an appeal to authority because I said " because smart people said so , smart people saying something means that 2+2=4 is a fallacy , but 2+2=4 is not a fallacy
@@binay413963han chup kar bangali rational word sunke teri gand jali hain isliye bakchodi krke counter fallacy de rha hain which is whatbouttery 😂
Make a video on saraswati river is it a real river or myth?
100% myth
@@rahulram9406 there are people providing evidence for it is it authentic?
@@Bhuvanfire it's a weak literary evidence, the academy doesn't approve of such claims
@@rahulram9406it does have evidences as mostly indus site are found near a place where people say sarawati river used to flow as at that time people used to establish civilization near side of the river
Try to do a podcast with Acharya Prashant
Great video Pranav
Bro polichu.
Proud atheist ❤
Atheist or believer, u still believe what u don’t know 😂😂😂
@@prashantvikramsingh9520 Nope.
Sadhguru makes these kind of content. It is because these kind of content is what worked out for him. To be a salesman is tough. You have to make them purchase your product whatever it is. Its his traits that helped him get there. He had a soothing sound and he was proficient in English.Hen business was not successful. There is a saying by Charlie munger, if you get an opportunity, don't ever let go of it, grab it with your life. People believe him because people wants to hear his bulshit. They want to be misled. There will be the misleading people and those who are misled, there will also people who show that you have been misled. The misleading people and those who show they have been misled are in sympiotic relationships. It is a win-win situation. But the consumers of the videos are fu*cked. They are using valuable time. It is like a pump and dump scheme. People who get dumped call it a scam and go to people influencers that tell them that the person who dumped them was a scammer. Same goes for sadguru. Blind belief is not Sadhguru fault. Blind belief is publics fault. Anyone can advice, it is upto you to believe them or not.
Bro will you take request for a video ?
it's so sad that none of the guys that you've called out have responded in the comment section ever...I follow Tom Nicholas on here, and whoever he has called out has been responsible enough to reply in the comment section which he has responded to and pinned. These guys are so shallow that they don't even have the courage to do that! Shameful
Commenting to increase your reach ehehe
6:11 Arvind skrondiger😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@scienceisdope
Hello sir,
I am a student
I have a question that
Do you follow Gita?
He doesnot
@@mr.gamerkabir8142how do u know ?
he is an atheist@@binay413963
@@mr.gamerkabir8142why?it's so good n? isn't it?
@@dannystark7668 why would an atheist follow gita lol?
lovely. i like more provocative responses to pseudoscience and faith. mockery and satire is a step in the right direction
Pranav getting handsome day by day 😳😏
I don't see it
Making a game is kinda weird but ya ok
True....let us see hiw it turns out (I don't have my hooes high , when Jacks does it , he did not do it about controversial and serious thing , it was related to a pathetic girl who wanted attention )
you should do a video on Sathya Sai Baba
Can't wait any more...
Pseudoscience ka game baja dala
I was not getting notification of your new videos, also I am banned your reddit sub, so wasn't aware of new videos. I will try the game. Thanks for explaining the fallacies. I recently became agnostic. Slowly killing the religious man inside me. I hated you when you made a video on Praveen Mohan, but slowly I started listening to you and found i was ignorant.
It's doesn't become true what ever u say I challenge you live debate with me
Ok let’s debate. Tell me when?
@@SameersQuestForGod8 debate where I am busy for months may be in jan it's year end work will be more I hardly get time I think it can't be in 5-10 minutes mean while choose topic for debate I make you clear with my views I believe in both science and religion I think religion and God is beyond science so in which topic you want to debate you should know that in advance if you fail to answer any questions in topic u have choosed I quit the debate and claim that you have ignorance fallacy I am studying in Hindu logical science nyaya darshan and vaisesika darshan so think before you debate if you cannot answer ignorance fallacy
@@SameersQuestForGod8 if you want to have debate before date I can connect with my nyaya darshan professor but I am not responsible if u cannot answer him he use logic for everything if you don't I could help in both point urs and mine but don't expect this from my professor five minutes enough for him to disprove your concept don't blame me later if u want to debate with me should wait till jan
@@SameersQuestForGod8 it's not cake walk to debate with Hindus and traditional Buddhists you can only fight in RUclips in reality you cannot stand in front of them do you think they studied logic for 12 -16 years they don't know logic
@@SameersQuestForGod8 if you so curious for debate choose topic if u so curious I connect this Sunday to my Buddhists friend ask him science if say ur not in reality and proves the same from logic I am not responsible think and choose the topic I forward it to right person don't expect Buddhists to answer the question he might use Just logic to know Buddhists logic once I asked him do god exists he Just used logic to prove existence of God later said follow text experience is required so choose topic correctly I forward to right person
Pranav plz make another channel for. Hindi viewers. ..🙏🙌
Make a video on ppl who deny evolution
did already
@@frootiiiqt stop replying everyone
@@jen4ra-vs5og no u qt
@@frootiii lmao
Fan of Upanishads and Bhagwad geeta but not a fan of jaggery dada
Being fan of a text is solely upon individual. You can be an atheist and love the scriptures as a text.
The same as I am an atheist and I am a fan of marvel comics.
Bcz he talks logically 😂
They love saying why dont you talk about othor religions
He is indian and majority is of hindus obviously he will blame a majority population and make so little videos on other ❤
As an ex Pranav hater, I have a little advice for Pranav: The amout of hate comments will drastically reduce if he be a bit respectful towards people's religious sentiments. Just like in Acharya Prashant's videos, he is against all superstitions but at the same time he also tells that this superstition is not spirituality. Real spirituality is something else. This way people perceive that this superstition is like a weed in spirituality that needs to be removed. But the way Pranav speaks sometimes implies like the religion is wrong in some aspects. Which hurts people's feelings. And instead of agreeing, they get even more defensive and believe even more in the superstitions.
According to me, 80% of Sadhguru is extremely wise and rest 20% of him is filled with bullshit facts that he read somewhere and didn't confirm (due to his bias) if the source is right or not.
basically u advising him to do Appeal to tradition.
I am not saying to continue tradition. But I am saying that when we debunk the superstitions, it looks like we are targeting the religion. Instead tell people that this is not your spirituality.
"Playing with colours on holi, bursting crackers on diwali or tying a thread on raksha bandhan is not spirituality. Knowing yourself and knowing the truth is."
-Acharya Prashant.
What I am saying is that people confuse tradition with spirituality and feel hurt when we debunk the tradition.
So basically thoda sa chato aur halke se kato method should be used with religious 😂
@Scienceisdope ,my comment was deletes
After all this I came to the conclusion that:
Religion ☯️ created for:
🎉 Respect: out of respect PPL start follow good PPL and that become religion at some point.
Like : followers of channel are also kind of same ... In very small ⚖️ scale
🎉Unity: stop fighting and make them 🤔 think in the same way
🎉 Guidelines: to provide guidance how to live , what to do n what 🚫 not
🎉 Focused: beleive in something one so that PPL don't waste time to explore every thing and not doing daily work .
🎉 Faith 🙏: PPL want something on which they can believe 🙏 and ask for help when in trouble
And it really works coz PPL get positivity when they think ... God will help them just keep doing.
And many other aspects fulfilled by religion.
So being in a group is better even when there are lots of non scientific concepts Are there just to feel PPL satisfied coz satisfaction 😂 is the biggest thing, if u have that u are good in every situation.
Buy yes smart PPL are using it to fool normal ppl and taking advantage.
That's very normal thing. In every field smart make fool other not so smart .
Yeah, but you don't necessarily need religion for them.
@@udhayveersingh1855u don't need shoes for running , u don't need gym to build muscles , u don't need practice to be good at mathematics..but it definitely helps
Look at India, China , Rome , Ottoman empire etc ,they were all built on religion and co existed
every and any thing can be used to make people hate each other
"Black vs white"
"Men vs womem"
"Straight vs trans"
"Muslims vs Hindu"
"Muslims vs Christian"
"Muslims vs Jew"
"Young people vs old people'
A lot of people fight in name of countries...should country be banned
People fight in name of food and wafer...should be ban food and water
People fight for race
Should we only let people of 1 race exist ?
@msrsculpts8179 no, no one says this .
And you don't need to be a scientist to ask why when and how.
If u don't know something that doesn't mean whatever I will say will be ultimate truth.
Same goes for religion or scientist both, if they can't prove it then it will remain just theory.
@msrsculpts8179that is a valid point , science can not , so we should probably try to make educated guesses , a lot of guesses by religion makes a lot of sense so I support them
U have proven your point , I agree with u , I thought u meant something else ,sorry
@@GoDEmon-xe1ve guess is guess.
Without any proof it's guess or theory. So don't believe on it.
Weather done by scientist or any religion.
But ppl are believing in it even when we know it's just theory or story or hypothesis.
Today's challenge
Watching Pranav on 0.25 X