Male Feminist Neil Gaiman DROPPED By Hollywood 🤣 Cancel Mobs He Helped Create Get Sandman CANCELLED
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 фев 2025
- #Netflix #Sandman #NeilGaiman'
★ Best Way To Support The Channel: / varadark
★ Second Best Way To Support The Channel: / @darktitanenterprises
► Streamlabs Donations: streamlabs.com...
► PayPal Donations: Varadark@darktitanenterprises.com
► Amazon Wishlist: www.amazon.com...
► X / Twitter: / vara_dark
► Instagram: / vara_dark
► Rumble: rumble.com/c/V...
► Discord: / discord
"Believe ALL Women!"
Alright Neil Gaimen.
Its always these types of guys that are the most creepy in my experience on social media as they typically are the creeper hiding in plain sight trying to masquerade as the good guy. Its like a predators camouflage.
@christopherdsuza7531
Same.
And simply look at the Sandman comic books.
Why is anyone surprised such a messed up mind would do such things?
*Nail Gayman
@@ttabood7462
Unfortunate.
True or not the fact that he dug his own grave with that statement few years ago is hilarious to say at least. 😂
He ruined his own death model. And death design was originally from a model he met bruh
SKIP MALE FEMINIST NEIL GAIMAN,
It's a pattern with male feminists.
all activists hide what they do behind their false outrage; smoke and mirrors.
Yup, david jaffe, destiny etc.
So he's being attacked by the very Frankenstein he helped create.
@Malhonn Let me clarify Frankenstein monster
@@mr.melancholy4973 There's always THAT guy , just waiting to pounce on someone saying Frankenstein , instead of Frankenstein's monster lol.
By the way did you know Mark Twains real name wasn't Mark Twain? it was Samuel Clemens. Mind blown right? lol
@Malhonn Seriously no one says Frankenstein's monster. You knew the point he was conveying Jesus Christ man...
@Malhonn it's pride that prompted you to correct OP when you clearly knew what OP was saying. Not that other way around.
@ I have to wonder if someone should correct the wonderful phrasing of
"since most people talk about without never actually read it, its very concerning, its it your pride hurt cause you got corrected" for them?
OR , should people just leave it alone like normal human beings , since the general idea of what they were trying to say was apparent? Quite the dilemma. Hate to see something like that go uncorrected lol
You can create your own monarchy, but that doesn't exempt you from getting overthrown.
They gender-swapped John Constantine???? Now I’m glad I never watched the Sandman series, and never will.
And Lucifer
Ffs its not a gender swapped john its one of his goddamn ancestors its not him how many times does this need to be explained?
They gender-swapped Constantine??? wtf?? I read they made him not bi in the TV series. Damn it! Everyone acts like someone’s gonna get offended.
Same here.
His graphic novel was very good though. Even if you don't like his politics or his wisdom, he writes very well.
Netflix is quick to join the cancel gaiman bandwagon yet they steadfastly defended Cuties? Interesting
The difference between successfully getting attention from hate clicks and failing to do so at work here, I'd imagine.
Still a good catch up though. 👍
Many such cases. SAD!
I'm glad that you mentioned that. It's been quite a while since the Cuties debacle but I cite it often when someone acts appalled that I don't sub to the service and haven't seen the latest Netflix thing. I will never forget what they did. Degenerates.
The women's Lib movement is now bringing back Puritanism.
Puritanism?
Guys, a male feminist being a complete creep? Here's my shocked face.
Gaiman, this is what happens when someone crafts a doomsday weapon device. That device has historically always came back to destroy its creators. Now, Gaiman, you are the target of that weapon.
What goes around, comes around.
"Live by the sword, die by the sword."
Yet only 2.57M watched season 1 after he did "sex swap and race swap" for "Inclusive" 😂👌🔥💀
Hoist by his own petard. Eh, what can ya do?
Laugh at the idjit . Now , I know its bad to laugh at mentally ill people . But he doesnt consider himself one
I always say that the most virtuos of signalers, like Jaffe, are the ones that need the closest of investigations.
Joss Whedon, Neil Gaiman, Warren Ellis,and the beat goes on.....
Warren Ellis had some weird accusations. Doesn’t seem like he really did anything.
@@deandrerobinson2590 Despite my dislike of Gaiman, and the irony in being attacked by the toxic culture he supported, I never believe any of these accusations until they actually provide evidence.
One positive is that at least some people are waking up and realising that even if you have several accusers, they can still be (and usually are) lying. Having more than one accuser used to lend credence to accusations, but these days it's become clear that anyone you have looked at in passing might accuse you of something if they think they can get away with it.
@@Murtagh653 In fairness, Gaiman has confirmed that at least some of the accusations were true. He just contends that those acts were consensual rather than assault.
@@drakocarrion that doesn't mean the accusation is true, as they have accused him of assault when he contends what happened was consensual, it just means that they did have a sexual encounter.
@ If someone accuses you of doing a thing & you say "yes it happened but it was consensual" you are confirming that the thing happened. That is what I'm pointing out. He has literally confirmed that some of the things he's been accused of doing were things he did do. He just contends that they were done with consent rather than being abuse. He's still confirming they happened.
He said to "believe all women" so...
In the end they ALWAYS eat their own.
I should add: there never should have Been a season 2 of Good Omens. The book was done and complete and the content in it ends in season 1. Neil making shit up about how "Terry and I always talked about doing Good Omens 2" is a laugh given that Sir Pratchett never collaborated with Gaimen again, and I think we can all guess Why after everything coming to light.
There's an interview in good omens where Prachet and Gamin say that well they kicked idea back and forth neither felt they clicked and were good enough for a sequel preferring to leave it as a one off.
Couple that with Sir Terry Prachets last will forbidding posthumous sequels and calling for his half done drafts and notes to be destroyed good omens getting a season 2 was an insult
strange how the people who accuse others of being horrible people are some of the most vile people ever! ooof!
Serves him right for the monster he made.
Fun totally not related fact: In nature, some predators will blend into their environment in order to get closer to their prey.
My opinion is that presumption of innocence applies to everyone, including the people you don't like, including the people who wouldn't give you the same courtesy.
k, mine stops at bad faith actors, they wanted believe all women to be the cultural norm, im holding them to their standards, they didnt defend presumption of innocence applies to everyone.
oh for sure, but the irony is still delightful and you should rub it in every chance you get
@@brunogamesbr1 I agree with you both 😊
Lol no. This is why conservatives keep losing. You guys are addicted to "playing fair" even when they fuck you over
"Thou doth protest too much."
Woke people in a nut shell, showing the world what they are by accusing others of their own crimes.
Should have gotten a cute, White, Goth chick as Death. I would have watched.
Sandman was always woke, just not by today's standards. It is a classic, though.
The real question is: Will DC drop him?
The accusations are the usual murky consent after the fact stuff. But yes, Gaiman wanted this, let him be judged by the ideas he perpetuated.
Netflix's Sandman was so woke it became unwatchable so I'm not even sad lol It absolutely massacred my favorite characters (Constantine, Lucifer, Death)
Those who virtue signal too much tend to hide too much!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Ew, they gender swapped JOHN FREAKING CONSTANTINE??? Yeah nah, never watched the show and thank goodness I never wasted my precious time with it.
He stands for them and them destroying him now. Ironic.
Well, he make his bed of thorns. Now he just get the lay down. It's sad, I really love the Sandman comics tho.
A "male feminist" who couldn't keep his hands to himself? What a total lack of surprise.
Two seasons on netflix is the norm. Even if nothing happened with Gaiman, it likely would be cancelled anyway.
You reap what you sow
"You can not watch it." I didn't and I owned from the original first printing of Sandman 1 by Vertigo to the end. Still own Death The High Cost of Living and have the trading cards. Was quite disappointed to see a creator willing to destroy his own work. Crazy thing is that after reading his work his lifestyle isn't that big of a surprise.
I mistook him for Neil Druckman.
Same aura, and now same level of irrelevance
Not true that was his evil doppelganger Neil Straightman.
Lesson I learned today: Don't virtue signal if you aren't prepared to be scrutinized. I think I learned this lesson several times last month, can we move on to a new lesson yet?
Last I heard he’s not disputing his actions but states all interactions were consensual so take of it what you will. I think also there’s a distinct possibility these women were clout-chasing.
Never watched it & no reason to watch it now 😂😂😂
Sad because it's good
No kidding about Sanderson. Just picked up his newest book and noticed that LGBT crap is in his books now.
I'd already dropped the Good Omens series when everyone turned gay. The first season was good. The second season was way too gay to continue watching it.
Never realized that there even was a Sandman series. But after Good Omens, I'll skip it too.
death could have looked cool as hell on screen.. but no, the wokeness had to destroy it
Whatever will we do without the writings of Bargain Basement Terry Pratchett?
Like they say: Pretend Woke, Become Broke.
The "believe all women" thing is how I will treat him.
The interesting thing is how Gaiman was getting a pass while Ed Piskor didn't. I think Piskor was always a leftie, but Gauman sold himself more as a feminist, and watching many of his videos he was really acting in them. He wasn't speaking naturally, and I get most pros will be prepare for a Masterclass video. But he was good at having dramatic pauses when speaking about how he got a slow start with his writing career.
He was good at making strangers think he knew him, not just knew his life and stories, but his fans felt like they were buddies. Parasocial bonding and it's best.
People will pick and choose what they are upset about. Gaiman slept with his child's babysitter, while Ben Affleck gets a pass. David Letterman paid money to several interns for sexual favors, but Letterman had Democrats on his show and was happy to kiss their asses.
People are jumping on Blake Lively, but I thought all criticism of women was bad? Most women on the left are fine with threats against JK Rowling because she thinks biology is real. Male feminists know when they should shut up when it comes to defending women.
It's sad. The Sandman is one of my favorite, if not my most favorite comics (tied with Hellblazer). The show was so disappointing. And even though Neil Gaimen is one of my favorite writers, I've always really disliked his personality. Even before he went all super woke, the dude was insufferable.
The dude is hyper talented at writing, but being hyper skilled at one thing doesn't mean he will be smart with other things.
@StackingGains This is so very true.
Yeah I believe in separating art from artists. Most of the books I love were written by people I either strongly disagree with or strongly dislike. Shame Gaiman turned out this way but still love some of his books.
Well he did it to himself so it was very much self inflicted so he pretty much made it implode within itself all thanks to his own crowd and honestly I haven't watched the show myself but if it ends up being canceled because of this guy's own doing, I probably wouldn't watch it
His graphic novels, books and old movies are extremely good. Don't hold as much hope for his recent stuff though.. Just focus on his old proven stuff.
@StackingGains okay I might have to look into his old movies
I can't read anything else he writes, to be honest, I never felt very comfortable with so many situations of abuse in Sandman, but I always justified it by saying that this world was rotten, so... Maybe it wasn't the world that was rotten! And unfortunately my favorite DC characters were the old Morpheus, Constantine and Lucifer; there's Rorschach, Manhattan and others that Gayman didn't touch his dirty finger on!
They've all been loving their consequence culture, haven't they? No surprising breaks with their priors? Right?
The sheer irony of the whole thing is just so hilarious.
Never liked him... overrated writer... good riddance! 🎉
Lucien was one of my favorite characters in the comic books and they race & gender swapped him in the show😒
Like the good book says, by the same measure with which you judge others you yourself shall be measured. Since his standard is believe all women, that's the standard that's going to be used to judge him
What is killing me is if Gaiman wasn't famous or he was a politician, these angry people would not say a word. I'm sick of these angry mobs going after celebrities but keep their mouth shut about these sick politicians.
When the inquisition arrives, eventually nobidy is pure enough...
Another one bites the dust.
Is that what Morpheus looks like in the show? I didn't bother with it after the death race swap. Which Niel gaiman yelled at ppl for saying it was stupid. I'll go back and read my sandman collection.
A "male feminist" just in it to be a cad? I'm shocked! Shocked, I tell you!!
Well, not that shocked . . .
How do think American God's fans feel? Now we're NEVER gonna get a proper conclusion to the series.
Maybe it's for the best. Look at gamers with Dragon Age: The Veilguard. Not getting any game was better than getting something like Veilguard but alas
You are getting better and better with every episode
He's wishing he'd never said believe all women. He wrote nasty things about me and thought it was funny. He's not laughing now, is he? Got no sympathy for the guy.
3:16 ah so all he did was switch cults
Wooow who could have seen this coming.
I called him out a few years ago on Twitter for virtue signaling with his character Death. I mentioned how that character was actually based on a real person’s look, Cinamon Hadley. He even commented on my response. Of course his comments were cringe. Too funny seeing him fall victim to the same people he adores 😅
I mean it's his rule.
Also me and him have debated before.
About iconoclasm and cultural cleansing of his own works.
yea right....
From $37K to $45K that's the minimum range of profit return every week I think it's not a bad one for me, now I have enough to pay bills and take care of my family.
HOW !! I know it's possible , I would appreciate if you show me how to go about it .
It's Roberta Ann Caudill doing she changed my life. A BROKER- like her is what you need.
$_700k and yet still counting on Roberta Ann Caudill is the kind of person one needs in his or her life to be honest❤️❤️❤️>>>>
😱Sounds familiar, I have heard her name on several occasions.. and both her success stories in the wall Street journal
ROBERTA ANN CAUDILL
Gotta love Karma.
I thought that was TLOU's Neil. Not Sandman's. Also, they couldve easily rolled with a female Constantine being a Variant.
I dont recall Netflix Sandman being an ElseWorld product officially, but the ArrowVerse had the accurate Constantine for a decade, and thats done. So having that actor reprise his role wouldve been confusing.
A Variant wouldve avoided trouble, but Neil just had to say "inclusivity", when we're tired of shoved-in politics in today's Western Media.
Haha I always somehow confuse Neil Gaiman with Clive Barker.
I believe them Neil
It’s always Male Feminists.
Seems every time something like this happens it is a male feminist? Weird huh.
Sandman is finaly getting put to bed.
You know what really makes me want to watch or play something?
Calling me an ist or a phobe. I make an effort to actively avoid them as they tend to be bad and use the name calling for free advertising.
HA! No loyalty from the woke. they eat their own faster than lightspeed. However it couldn't have happened to a more deserving person. He brought this upon himself.
I bet he regrets believing the woman (Scarlett) when she texted him with the reassurance "everything between us was consensual (and wonderful)". There is no way of interpreting this story in which she didn't lie, at some point; either when she said it was consensual (which she claims she only said to cheer him up) or later when she told her story to Tortoise media and said it wasn't.
I do believe though that he believed it was consensual otherwise he wouldn't have been doing the virtue signalling during "Me Too".
But, I do see a lot of the standard virtue signallers doing hand-wringing videos titled "we need to talk about Neil Gaiman" and I think, "do we? How come? I don't recall being called for jury service!" As if, if we don't condemn him we must be condoning him, when clearly none of us are in receipt of all the evidence, we only have the information we have through the filter of unreliable journalists with an agenda who will be cherrypicking details to fit a narrative structure, and this really should be tried in a court of law, not in the public sphere.
One such virtue signaller is Vaush, who is by (albeit, unsubstantiated) internet rumour not without his own unsavory predilictions, so really should be a little reticent about casting stones, who speculates "how long before Gaiman turns MAGA?" (Citing people like Russell Brand as the pattern) Well... could you blame him, if he did? Who would want to be in a social space in which everyone around you dogmatically assumes every detail of your public demonisation to be true without skepticism (unless your surname is Biden, in which case it is Russian disinformation)? He also tried to draw parallels between Amanda Palmer's collusion with Gaiman as being like Ghislaine, but they are not remotely comparable as a couple. I would suggest a better comparison might be Simone De Beauvoir and Jean-Paul Sartre, though it is less topical, in that they too were polyamorous and De Beauvoir seduced young women (significantly younger and morr impressionable than the women Gaiman and Palmer were involved with) to be lovers for Sartre, and both couples espoused a modernist feminist ideology that informed their sexual lifestyle. Whilst Epstein and Ghislaine were running a blackmail operation which there is no reason to think Gaiman and Palmer were using women in that way.
The other thing I notice is a large proportion of the feminists now doing scandal videos about how they are "done with" Gaiman or so disappointed or feel betrayed by him, are transwomen, so in other words men that already have such a high dose of misandry that they can't accept that they themselves are men, and I think "c'mon, if you were that conscientious about consent then why are you demanding the right to use women's changing rooms? Is causing a woman discomfort not a problem if you wear a bra; is that the rule?
That sums up my thoughts. I'm never really impressed by numbers because I think once an allegation is made public there is a domino effect where past events get reinterpreted through a new lens, almost like scenes from a movie played with a horror soundtrack become sinister just by the mood suggested by the soundtrack. Yes, the journalists managed to collect nine women, but by their own admission "of varying shades" of egregiousness, some of which would have been unremarkable without the context of the first allegation.
Fourth observation, before I wrap up: I'm making no assessment of his guilt or otherwise, but the reception of the story and Gaiman's current predicament reminds me of Annie Teriba who was an Oxford student union rep back in 2014ish, I think, who was very "woke", by current terminology, or an "sjw" by the terminology of back then; an activist in the "Rhodes must fall" campaign which was aligned with BLM before the George Floyd incident made BLM mainstream, and ran "consent training" workshops that preached an absurd level of conscientiousness to ensure that apparent consent was real consent, (consider "power dynamics", level of intoxication, possible emotional pressure or peer pressure yada yada, until "real consent" becomes an unobtainable ideal). Naturally she got accused of sexual assault by two "women" (at least one of which was biologically male, we can assume since she was reported as using a "transphobic slur" when she was first confronted with the allegation). No one came to her defence! The anti-sjw crowd rubbed their hands in glee that she was hoist by her own petard and the sjw crowd of course wouldn't countenance the idea that any allegation was false. She was forced to make a public apology that her accusers curated (the first apology she wrote they binned because she attempted to "humanize herself" in her telling of it and they made her write a new one) and she had to resign from her position on the student council and disppeared from public view. But, by normal definitions I don't think she had assaulted anyone. Unfortunately for her she had by the definitions she herself endorsed. Whenever I see someone in that culture of activism get accused I do think, bear in mind the company they are keeping that the likelihood of getting accused must be quite high, given the expanded definitions they endorse. I also think bdsm culture must present a high likelihood too because it is a form of bedroom LARPing in which one is playing out fantasies of being abused, so you know it is attracting people who romanticize the idea of being victims, so you know that is already something they have an obsession about.
.. Neil What?man
Nature is healing.
Karma is a beautiful thing.
I can never look at butter in the same way again.
Happy 150 K subscribers Vara❤❤❤
I wasn't into the Sandman comic, so skipping the show was easy for me. Innocent until proven guilty, of course. I did enjoy reading Good Omens, but I suspect Pratchett's talents were responsible for that.
We all knew it was either Genius or Weirdo route😂
sad to hear that. American gods actually is a great book.it's kinda annoying that art people come out as just one more money sucker without its own vision in the end
i stoped watching sandman at the first episode as it was filled with DEI hires.
Male feminist Neil Gaiman FELTED
Bruh his name is Gai Man and he's a male feminist....It LITERALLY writes itself.
You reap what you sow Gaiman
As someone who read the entire series, he's right about Sandman always being woke. There were a lot of eyebrow raising moments in those comics. Read the story arc A Game for You centered around the character Barbie, and tell me that that isn't a very woke story before the term woke even became a thing?
Edit: Sorry for my english, not my first language. Also, are we going to forget the very pdf file character Delirium?
to be fair Sandman was truly always super woke. That was at the time woke was not a curse word though. But the wokeness of the Sandman was mostly based on sexuality and trans people. Also, most important characters were white. Though The Endless were unnaturally white like statues. I love Sandman comics and will not ever stop loving Gaiman projects despite his behavior. And Netflix's Sandman was pretty good except for race swapping many important character. Lucius I was ok with being portrayed by black woman, but Death and Rose being black makes no sense. Atleast in if one considers that in 15th century flashback Death was in England's pub and Rose being descendant of rich woman from UK Unity Kinkaid is also unrealistic considering history of racism in Europe.
GOOD DAMN IT !!!!! THIS IS NOT ON MY BINGO CARD !!!!!
I am not supporting woke bs, but Tom Sturridge who played Dream is one hell of a good actor.
at one time the sandman comics had some of the best storytelling in the comic book world. weird, harsh, bloody and emotional, and not fair or soft at all. good mythic world building stuff.
its a gd shame this is how he ended up, too bad he insisted on carrying an extra long petard. die young or become the villain neil, good riddance.
Oh man, I'm enjoying this. Now....let's dig up Pratshit and his posthumous skeletons.
I mean he must have known stuff working with Gaiman and probably kept it under his (stupid) hat, having something to hide himself.
lol dude got REKT
His name precedes him really😂🤣🥳
No loss there. Sandman started out fine... Then became woke 😂
Blandman
Sandman was ok on Netflix. I would have preferred to see a comic accurate set of characters. That said the actors were really good for the folks they played. As for Neil, yeah I am disappointed. I was a big fan of his in the early days. I had grown out of most of that type of work a decade or so ago. Also never trust a male feminist.
People who are always act extremely happy and joyful have an extremely dark side as well.
If you are happy you need to be investigated.
Should drop Neil Druckman too