Bach just stays unbelievable ... the intelligence of this man must have been so crazy high till today we're so impressed by his music it's like somebody from the future (the endpoint) went back in time with a time-machine lol to the 17/18th century & from there on started to impress EVERYBODY who will ever life on this planet with Bach you get the feeling that even Aliens would understand him it's universal, it's perfection, he has done what nobody ever has done & it's simply unbeatable two greatest composers EVER lived imo are JS Bach & Beethoven
Wunderschöne Interpretation dieses perfekt komponierten Konzerts mit seidigem Ton der Solovioline, mildem Ton der Soloflöte und shimmerndem Klang des Cembalos sowie gut harmoniserten und perfekt entsprechenden Tönen der anderen Instrumente. Der zweite Satz klingt besonders schön und echt melodisch. Im Kontrast klingt der dritte Satz echt lebhaft und auch begeisternd. Wunderbar vom Anfang bis zum Ende!
One of my favourite Bach's pieces. The cembalo ( harpsichord) part is quite difficult. Notice that at the end of the first movement it has a long section on its own, similar to a cadence in a piano concert.
@@herrickinman9303 You’re splitting hairs. It comes between 6/4 and 5/3 progressions, and Bach was perfectly capable of improvising it on the spot. An earlier, less spectacular version exists. A cadenza may be written out, as this one is. A capriccio is an independent piece.
@@danielwaitzman2118 You're applying the 19th-century usage of _cadenza_ to the 18th century. A cadenza in Bach's time was always improvised. I read in an authoritative source that the so-called cadenza in this concerto is a capriccio, not a cadenza. The issue is not whether Bach could improvise a cadenza; the issue is that a written down passage cannot be an improvisation. The original capriccio in an earlier version of this concerto, was much shorter. Have you heard it?
@@herrickinman9303 Do you have formal training in Music or Musicology? I see that you have videos on pipe-fitting on your Channel. I defer to your opinions on pipe-fitting, but not to your views concerning my own profession. Think twice before you issue pronunciamentos on musical matters-just some friendly advice, which you’ll probably ignore. We both love the music of J.S. Bach, and that should suffice. If you wish to continue this, be prepared for my opinions on pipe-fitting.
I agree with Hawkeye on M A S H. He was attempting to help Radar become more sophisticated to impress a lady.. and told him to respond to classical music with "Ahhhh Bach"
If I had to be stranded on a desert island with all the works of only one artist, I would choose Bach
A fuga com beleza única!
Fine performance. And it's always wonderful to see the original fair copy.
One of the best compositions of the great maestro J.S. Bach I have ever heard! Thank you so much for uploading, Bartje Bartmans!
What an extraordinary history - not rediscovered until 1849.
Bach just stays unbelievable ...
the intelligence of this man must have been so crazy high
till today we're so impressed by his music
it's like somebody from the future (the endpoint) went back in time with a time-machine lol to the 17/18th century & from there on started to impress EVERYBODY who will ever life on this planet
with Bach you get the feeling that even Aliens would understand him
it's universal, it's perfection, he has done what nobody ever has done & it's simply unbeatable
two greatest composers EVER lived imo are
JS Bach & Beethoven
Wunderschöne Interpretation dieses perfekt komponierten Konzerts mit seidigem Ton der Solovioline, mildem Ton der Soloflöte und shimmerndem Klang des Cembalos sowie gut harmoniserten und perfekt entsprechenden Tönen der anderen Instrumente. Der zweite Satz klingt besonders schön und echt melodisch. Im Kontrast klingt der dritte Satz echt lebhaft und auch begeisternd. Wunderbar vom Anfang bis zum Ende!
Allegro: 0:00
Affectuoso: 10:07
Allegro: 15:34
That harpsichord solo is a real smokeshow
Great Bach! Thank you.
One of my favourite Bach's pieces. The cembalo ( harpsichord) part is quite difficult. Notice that at the end of the first movement it has a long section on its own, similar to a cadence in a piano concert.
And that is exactly what it is.
@@danielwaitzman2118 Although it's often called a cadenza, it's not. It's a capriccio. A cadenza is improvised.
@@herrickinman9303 You’re splitting hairs. It comes between 6/4 and 5/3 progressions, and Bach was perfectly capable of improvising it on the spot. An earlier, less spectacular version exists. A cadenza may be written out, as this one is. A capriccio is an independent piece.
@@danielwaitzman2118 You're applying the 19th-century usage of _cadenza_ to the 18th century. A cadenza in Bach's time was always improvised. I read in an authoritative source that the so-called cadenza in this concerto is a capriccio, not a cadenza. The issue is not whether Bach could improvise a cadenza; the issue is that a written down passage cannot be an improvisation. The original capriccio in an earlier version of this concerto, was much shorter. Have you heard it?
@@herrickinman9303 Do you have formal training in Music or Musicology? I see that you have videos on pipe-fitting on your Channel. I defer to your opinions on pipe-fitting, but not to your views concerning my own profession. Think twice before you issue pronunciamentos on musical matters-just some friendly advice, which you’ll probably ignore. We both love the music of J.S. Bach, and that should suffice. If you wish to continue this, be prepared for my opinions on pipe-fitting.
I find this more accurate rather than others versions.... 👌🏻🎶🎼❤️❤️🎵🎼🎶❤️
Always Bach🎶🎶🎶💐
I agree with Hawkeye on M A S H. He was attempting to help Radar become more sophisticated to impress a lady.. and told him to respond to classical music with "Ahhhh Bach"