The Dasamsa (D10) and Transits through the Vargas with Vedic Astrologer Ernst Wilhelm
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 янв 2024
- In this video, Ernst Wilhelm discusses the multiple ways to calculate the D10 (the Dasamsa) and the reason for each calculation. We also talk about the use of vargas (divisional charts or harmonic charts) to make better predictions with transits.
Kala Astrology Software:
www.vedic-astrology.net/Kala/...
Levi Cosijn's Astrology Page: www.levicosijn.com/
View the full curriculum of the Asheville Vedic Astrology Apprenticeship Program here: vedic-astrology.teachable.com/
Facebook Asheville Vedic Astrology
/ ashevillevedicastrology
#VedicAstrology
#Astrology
#learnastrology
#divisionalcharts
#vargas
Some truths are to be learned as a language, by listening, and listening again, and again...
Om.
Thanks for referencing me Ryan. Ernst and I have discussed many fascinating astrological ideas over the last couple of years. But here I need to point out though that it is the research of astrologer Rok Koritnik that really opened my eyes to the difference between parivritti and irregular varga theory. Also the connection between the parivritti drekkana and the navamsa came through his research, which then resulted in Ernst programming the parivritti drekkana for the Yogada calculations in Kala.
Rok was just asking about you.
@@RyansVedicAstrology Oh yes, he sent me the video.
Oh, I did not know that came from Rok!
@@ErnstWilhelm Yes, the difference between the parivritti vargas and other irregular vargas raised some questions regarding Yogada calculations.
Bless you Ernst, reading my mind here. Bless you Ryan for the opportunity!
Om.
Thank you brothers 🙏
I appreciate your intellect, guys. I don’t really understand what you are talking about here, but i like to listen anyway. :)
that was very high level and very useful! thank you!
Thank you for this video!
You are so welcome!
I enjoy and learn so much from each video on this Channel and Ernst as well.
I do have a question that it has me feeling confused. What is the difference between Vedic Astrology and Vedic Tropical astrology?
I got a chart from a Vedic Astrologer and my Ascendant based on that chart showed to be Capricorn. However, when I use the website in this channel to calculate my birth chart, Aquarius shows as my ascendant. I would love if you had the time to explain what the difference is or which one I should be following. I would also be very interested in a reading if you are offering these.
Thank you so much for your time and for all the work you do.
As a quick clarification, judging the transits in a varga: Say Saturn is in Pisces in the sky, we look at Pisces in each Varga to see how Saturn is affecting that varga? Thank you Ryan and Ernst!
Almost. If you make a chart for THIS moment (with Saturn in Pisces), then look at the vargas from THAT chart of this moment. It will tell you what Saturn is doing by transit in EACH varga.
I guess it is now about your energy at this point that you give, and not about some narrow technical topic.
Levi is pronounced "lev-ee".
It rhymes with chevy.
that's heavy!
I have learnt astrology with your content guys for a couple of years. I've done all that, hundreds of hours, to evetually come to the conclusion that astrology is bullshit. still big respect for your knowledge. but it's just theory.
it's hard to make those predictions work, isn't it?
There is generally a lack of empirical research in astrology. Myself and a few friends of mine have put many of the ancient techniques and concepts (both Western and Indian) to test and I can say without any reservation that a lot of them don't work, no matter how hard we try. A lot of ancient astrology is mostly theory. Just try Jaimini's svamsha techniques with both tropical and sidereal Zodiacs. Most of them don't work at all no matter which concept of svamsha we use. Just poor techniques with below 45% of accuracy.
But, there is some stuff that works really, really well. It's just that we need to distil the stuff from the old texts, use what works and expand on it. Also, expanding horizon by studying ancient western astrology and also some modern ideas is beneficial.
As an astrology skeptic who practices astrology I say to myself many times: "What if it's all bullshit?" But then astrology finds its way to surprise and amaze me. There's more to it than study from a text or a teacher. It requires inner commitment and deep contemplation of fundamental principles, plus, finding the techniques that resonate with you, techniques you're able to wield effectively, because you really understand them. Also, without a systematic approach there will be no repeatability and reliability. One needs a system and this is especially true for the vargas. Most astrologers use vargas in a chaotic, haphazard way. Most modern jyotish theory on vargas is rubbish. Most modern jyotish which unnaturally puts together Jaimini, Parashari and Varahamihira's (Yavana style) jyotish has no order and is more chaotic than western modern astrology is. It's just one big mess and no wonder it comes out as just theory. Even a poor one.
Nowadays I only take seriously astrological research based on empiricism, which means testing techniques on lots of charts, systematically with obligatory test for false positives.
@@rok_koritnik hey, thank you for the effort you put in this response. I like the way you reason and imho it's the only way to navigate through the complexities of this topic. would you mind connecting online? I'd love to know more about your research
What makes me sad about this comment is that astrology has gone over so many people’s head, just like religion. I mean, I understand, it is our egos desire to control our lives and to feel prepared for the worst- but the truth is that the zodiacs and its planets were designed to hold the human evolution. Hence even the word “Grahas”. The universe is a “story” that writes itself every day.
Jyotish- Science of Light.
As in “matter”.
Mater- mother ;)
It’s a “language”.
Of “Time”.
@@MaRaXxX17 seems like you misunderstood my comment