My 10 Favorite Books I've Read in 2019
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 июн 2024
- Patreon: / cuck
Twitter: / philosophycuck
Music by Snow.Drift
snowdrift.bandcamp.com/album/...
/ snowdriftproductions
Book links:
Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature:circulosemiotico.files.wordpr...
Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk:
archive.org/details/cyberspac...
www.amazon.com/Cyberspace-Cyb...
Beyond Human Rights:
www.amazon.com/Beyond-Human-R...
Videodrome Scene-by-Scene:
www.amazon.com/Videodrome-Sce...
The Marx-Engels Reader:
sandiegodsa.org/Marx/karl-marx...
Heidegger: a (very) critical introduction:
www.amazon.com/Heidegger-Very...
The Unbearable Lightness of Being:
www.msjkeeler.com/uploads/1/4...
The Idea of Continental Philosophy:
www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/...
www.amazon.co.uk/Idea-Contine...
Theorizing Patriarchy:
libcom.org/files/Theorizing%2...
Life Without Money:
www.amazon.com/Life-Without-M...
"Hey it's Cuck"
Chuckled heartily.
*cuckled
"Hey, it's CUCK"
Such a powerful, alpha level opening
Yeah.
I would never thought, that an open fear of being ridiculed through a certain word expressed through its preventive use, can be called alpha move.
@@torgon2711 and I didn't know you could read other people's mind. Whats next, you're gonna tell us how him having a "C" in his name is motivated by a love of cookies or something?
@@nocap7885 nah, buddy, sometimes you can just think a little and that's enough. i know, for a lefty it's nearly impossible, but i trust in you, bro.
@@torgon2711 You're a very fun and cool guy
thank you mister Ｃｕｃｋ
The analytic philosophy chart made me think of a "continental philosophy virgin vs analytical philosophy chad" meme, and the equally reductionist nature of such comparisons.
Wouldn't that just be virgin Nietschze vs chad Russell?
@@islandboy9381 that's hilarious, I want to see Russell in a wife beater shirt kicking sand into Nietzsche's eye.
Glad to hear you liked theorizing patriarchy as much as I did.
Brought a tear to my eye to hear that LSR and your channel are what Cuck was watching back in the day. You two where what got me into the theory side of leftism when I was like 14.
Hope you are doing well
I love when my favorite philosophical and political RUclipsr's crossover.
anarchopac I started reading it because of your reccomendation and used cuck’s channel pretty often to help understand some of the terminology used, love both of your videos
Why do you hate humanity?
@apostleofazathoth7696 damn i wish i had done that at your age. Instead, I was an anti-SJW till I was 17, ans I wasn't a leftist till my early 20s.
How did you find their channels, if I may ask?
rick and rorty
sorry for making this comment
Mick and Rorty
@@tandogjzethenrikc.7544 Ricardo y Mortín
Thanks, Cuck, for your kind mentioning of my book. I really appreciate that. If you would like to be on our show, "The Hypermodernity Podcast" at some point to discuss your favorite books, we would love to have you.
@CuckPhilosophy PLEASE
Is this the real JDE?
@@arvaakuka8568 yes
tis better if you send an email. i think.
I love the background music this time around. Great video as always.
Sartrey... lord have mercy. But seriously good video. And I would love a continental/analytic philosophy vid.
(Escpecailly because im a stupid undergrad who likes continental philosophy but didnt really understand the difference until after i started studying in the UK. Really could have used a video like that a year ago...)
I've read Marx unprepared when I was 21. As you said the Manifesto and Das Kapital. Fuck I was not prepared, that took me significantly longer than I thought. But made a paper on the discrepancies between Marx and the implementation of communist regimes. I soon realized Marx and Engels ideas were not implemented and that secondary sources often got him quite wrong, even contemporary sources.
The dumbest thing I did was listen to a secondary source saying you had to have a complete understanding of Hegel's Phenomenology of Mind, and going in there unprepared as well........starting with the fucking preface, which was quite the chore on it's own. After that I decided to become someone who professionally breaks bricks with his head. Had to get it of my chest, that fucking paper still haunts me in my dreams.
Unbearable Lightness is also an incredible book. Though I'm more right-leaning and conservative than you I think it's a great list.
Such a nice read, glad to hear we can get along
@Jan Kuiper Just out of curiosity, is there anything interesting you can share that you learned when readin Marx?
@@GreenGraffiti20 What I found interesting is the way Lenin actually forced the revolution in a way that does not align with Marx's theory concerning the five steps a society has to go through before actually becoming socialistic and then communistic. It is the same mistake Western countries make when they just want to put democracy as a cherry on the top, except the cake still has to be baked.
I prepare by trying to find the actual book.........>.>
@@jankuiper3422 what are some misconceptions that you had about marx and his writings that you dont believe after reading him?
Finally you are back!! please make more videos... I just discovered youw chanel and I've been Very excited..the best channel about philosophy on yt.
lol I don't know if anyone here watches booktube, but it would be hilarious if in the middle of all these philosophy books you just recommended an edgy YA High Fantasy erotica retelling of Rumpelstiltskin novel like the shit they read on there.
I honestly don't know if there are any good novel's that have been published in the last 20 years. When we reference material from that period in class its mostly movies.
@@uperdown0 there definitely is, but we will only know about them in a hundred years
@@LucasVenturoso I'd compare it to letting something sit over night, and letting the cream assemble at the top. Then, the cream gets a cream on top of it, and that's all of the good books released in the last twenty years.
@@uperdown0 Roberto Bolaño's books are great. there's also a fuss around Knausgård, but I haven't read anything he wrote.
@@gustavttt4148 It's just that most of the "popular" English fiction of our time is fairly bad. Fiction in other cultural spheres tend to be more enthralling, which is probably why so many young teens end up addicted to anime and manga and light novels and shit. Like shit Moby Dick is amazing, but that was written almost 170 years ago. I don't think any of us will know in 100 years (if we make it that long) what the best novels of our age are, but the Indians and Chinese will. I study fucking comp lit and I don't know where the good novels are. Although, that being said, my personal favorite that came out in the last 20 years is Alain Mabanckou's "Memoirs of a Porcupine". Funnily enough, I think I was still reading that book when I made my comment 9 months ago.
"Nietzsche says that all events return eternally."
Perhaps this is worded poorly, but taken at face value it is blatantly wrong. Nietzsche posited the idea of the Eternal Reoccurance not as a statement of fact but as a thought-experiment, one by which you could gauche whether the life you are leading now is worthy to be repeated eternally.
Quoted from 'Der Fröhliche Wissenschaft' ('The Gay Science'):
"What if some day or night a demon were to steal after you into your loneliest loneliness and say to you: 'This life as you now live it and have lived it, you will have to live once more and innumerable times more' ... Would you not throw yourself down and gnash your teeth and curse the demon who spoke thus? Or have you once experienced a tremendous moment when you would have answered him: 'You are a god and never have I heard anything more divine.'"
I addressed this on Twitter. It's true that in the Gay Science it's presented as a thought-experiment, but Nietzsche also believed it literally, and used the cosmological literature of his time to back it up.
@@jonasceikaCCK I think he eventually abandoned the idea of it actually existing. So, in the beginning he posed it as a question, then he thought it could be true, but then he posed it as a question again.
@@jonasceikaCCK Yeah, there's definitely room for debate, but I think it's more mainstream now to consider it a thought experiment. It's been a couple years since I was up on the debate, but I remember the pro he-actually-believes-this camp pulling heavily from The Will to Power, a notebook where it's hard to distinguish personal musings from what he felt confident enough to publish.
I better see 12 rules for life on this list.
:DDDD
Lmao
I did read that last year, and went with my family to see him speak.
xD
This is a list for 2019 not for list of all time
You quoted Alain de Benoist? Awesome.
At first, I thought you are a diehard leftist, but now you seem one of the few philosophy channels who talks about every author regardless of political alignment.
This makes your channel one of the best philosophy channels on youtube.
Hiii, longtime viewer and I just became a patron, so you could say I am now a patron of cuckoldry. Your video on limit experiences is my favourite and tho he's on hiatus, would love to see another streamed dialectic with Distributist. You're in a league of your own around here, thanks for the great work.
Also, Alfsvoid is back in the milieu, would be intrigued to see a dialectical venn diagram with you two.
Correction at 13:07 Nietzsche doesn’t say all events return eternally, he says we should live as if that were the case
Generally so, but I think sometimes I he just talks as if it's the case though.
If there's any philosopher that says one thing forcefully on one page and then completely does a 180' within the next 4 pages afterwards it's Friedrich Nietzsche.
@@Hooga89 lol
@@theory_underground yeah but he describes it as like an interesting truth you could believe in for fun
False. In the Will to Power (a collection of his notes) he speaks about the reality of the eternal recurrence and how it relates to his ontology. He even was planning to create a book called the eternal recurrence. The main premise for it was that if there was an end state for the universe it would have already occurred. The fact that we are currently experiencing reality means that it is recurring.
9:02 omg it's the Chinese Marx anime!!!
To be honest, in a proper anime about Marx, I'd ship Karl and Friedrich across the world
a man of culture I see
@@mikuhatsunegoshujin Just pause at 9:32, when they face each other on the street: there's so much potential there
Whats the name of it? Are there English subtitles available for it?
@@rhyscooper3693 ruclips.net/video/0T0a_jXHiDo/видео.html
I’d like to see your opinion on Videodrome, and other films of its kind.
Another excellent video of your favorites for the year. I always appreciate your recommendations. I’d like to share with you a helpful way to get into psychoanalysis if you choose to do so. I think that better application of psychoanalysis to philosophy, political praxis, etc. would greatly help society and the persons within it. Freud is very influential, but I feel he oftentimes missed the mark. I think reading Faces in a Cloud (‘79) by Atwood & Stolorow is the best introduction to psychoanalysis. It’s the first book by the pioneers of Intersubjective Psychoanalysis. It even has an excellent psychobiographical analysis of Freud which highlights the strengths and weaknesses of his theories.
Freud and Beyond (‘96) by Mitchell & Black is another good introduction to psychoanalysis. It summarizes the historical development of the field including and after Freud (but doesn’t reach Intersubjective Psychoanalysis). One co-author, Stephen Mitchell, is the pioneer of Relational Psychoanalysis, so you get a feel for that after you read about the other psychoanalytic frameworks. Hope this helps if you decide to take the psychoanalytic plunge!
I absolutely hated Karl Marx - up until I started reading Karl Marx
Note also that almost everything by Marx and Engels, as well as a whole lot of other political philosophers Marxist and otherwise, can be found for free at www.marxists.org
Great recommendations! I definitely agree with your evaluations of Rorty and Marx. They are great thinkers and well worth a read. That last book, "Life Without Money," really seems like one I'd like to pick up.
Love your videos!
Glad you read Rorty. I wrote my dissertation on him last year.
I read Kundera's Unbearable Lightness of Being as a teenager, (too) many years ago, and way before I got into Nietzsche. I don't remember the book much, but I do remember it informing my understanding of eternal return.
One of the best things I read concerning cybernetics from the 90s is N. Katherine Hayle's "How we became post-human". Really explores the idea of information as embodied and the cultural history of the concepts of information and data.
I missed your video on Miyazaki TWICE. I wonder when I'm FINALLY gonna be able to watch it.
I think your first recommendation book in this video is a fantastic choice. I thought of the goofy "are we in a simulation" question you see mentioned in the context/ company of scientific conversations.
Wait, there's a Karl Marx anime?!
Yes. It’s on RUclips.
It really saddens me when studios that produce such great art act like such utter wankers by blocking educational content. They aren't even protecting their property they're just suppressing education.
copyright is not property, there is no possible net-benefits from monopolizing thoughts. it is just a means to create cronies and legitimize censorship.
@@sofia.eris.bauhaus when a studio makes a film that film is literally the property of the studio
@@maximthefox no. it's not. a film is information, and it makes no sense to claim ownership of it. other people copying it does not cause you any cost.
this is on contrast to real property where you can actually benefit form being the exclusivity: if you have a home for yourself, you may arrange it towards your needs, without needing to care if it's useful for other people. you property can, to some extent, be an extension of yourself. something that you can rely on.
(of course property also has disadvantages. in a free society you would need to negotiate with the people around you which things can be property and which can't.)
@@sofia.eris.bauhaus Well you can say it isn't on moral grounds, that's fine. But in terms of the law, Spirited Away is the property of Studio Ghibli.
What is and isn't property in terms of morality is essentially the basis of our whole entire culture. If you ask a lot of people, having land as property is immoral.
Whether somethings is physical or not doesn't really come into it so much as the effects having x or y thing as property has on our societies.
@@maximthefox well, the term "intellectual property" certainly exists, but i think you'll find that it's most prominent in propaganda, and rather more controversial among legal scholars.
as i said before, the property analogy doesn't really work. if someone breaks your window, they can be held accountable to buy you a new one. someone who copies a movie can't pay damages because there is no damage done, the amount demanded by the copyright holder is completely arbitrary.
it is not entirely unthinkable that copyright could arise in a free society, but establishing it would either mean complete cultural isolation of the group in question, or just everyone on earth going along with it. this is another difference from real property, where you just can't take away some property in australia without being in australia yourself. property law can be local, "IP" can't really.
i loved and am interested in all you have read on previous year
Please do the video about the difference between analytic & continental philosophy
Thank you for linking free pdfs 😍😍😍😍💓
Damn, heidegger video got blocked before I got to watch it.
same ... again
you can torrent it
idk if its still being seeded but heres the magnet link i got it from
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:957770661a4c04247bd62e4145bd1f01a5fee204
I'm Roko's Basilisk thanks! i hope it works
I’ll check that in the morrow. Many thanks.
Rorty is one of my favourite contemporary philosopher. If you really liked his ideas and got some background knowledge of analytic philosophy, I would recommend you to read about Wilfrid Sellars, John McDowell and Robert Brandom. They are sometime called the Pittsburgh Hegelians, which is a very interesting trend. (Just imagine Hegel's philosophy being re-interpreted in the language of analytic philosophy.)
thx for the tip
sounds kind of like Manuel DeLanda. he writes about Deleuze in the language of analytic philosophy
Thank you for your book list. I look forward to reading your lists.
By the way, what is your opinion of Georgism?
cuck is a socialist and against the currency, so I don't think he will have a favorable view of Georgism. after all henry, George was a capitalist too.
Rorty actually got me interested in postmodernism. For me it was Rorty > Wittgenstein > Heidegger (literally nothing but Heidegger for like 2 years) > Foucault > now I'm working on Hegel and Deleuze
Also the Unbearable lightness of being is my absolute #1 book of all time. Bar none.
I would love to hear you talk about John Maus given you’ve read something about him. He’s the reason I started reading philosophy.
THX for the vid, papa Cuck. This comment is for the algorithm.
Hey, Cuck Philosophy! If you're interested in Rorty and the therapeutic philosophers, might I suggest Mcdowell's "Mind and World" and some stuff from "The New Wittgenstein"? I used to be super into Rorty, and still identify as therapeutic in his sense, but have since believed that Rorty's method is sort of counter-productive for therapeutic philosophers such as myself (for more of what I mean, there's a paper McDowell wrote called "Towards Rehabilitating Objectivity" that explains he dissolves such questions in philosophy). Just a few recommendations I particularly like!
Today I got a Library card. I will have to see if I can borrow any of these books.
I also came upon the phrase "castles in the sky" and ended up watching Laputa by Studio Ghibli. I would really like to see your video on the subject of Hayao Miyazaki. I was quite fond of that movie. Copyright law is confounded!
You should make a video that explains your political beliefs in more detail. Do you belong to a exact tendency with in Leftism? are their any flaws with Marxism? what is your position on various Leftist issues( like the Soviet union or Anarchism)? As far as I can tell, your more open minded and more dynamic than most of "left"tube. Your channel seems like something I should be influenced by.
He's more open minded because he doesn't only read leftist theory. There's a tendency on the left to just read leftist authors, which isn't bad necessarily. But this has the side effect of trying to make your thought as "pure" as possible is as far as it relates to Marxist thought. As much as I respect principled MLs, they can annoy me with how rigid their thinking can be. I think a lot of leftists would benefit from reading some Foucault because his writing on power/knowledge meshes quite well with Marxist thought IMO.
@@bigbone_99 I'd say that Deleuze is even more crucial to wake MLs up a bit. Not that I'm attacking their ideology, but it is true that in the worldwide revolutionary movement there's a lot of dogmatism and such, and Deleuze and Guattari just shatter a lot of capitalistic methods of thinking and ideas. After reading A Thousand Plateaus I just stood there thinking holy shit this has not only made me get a better understanding of the world around me or at least get another view, but I also did grow as a person with it.
@@tonacion I definitely want to work my way up to D&G since I found Cuck Philosophy's video on societies of control quite interesting, but it's cool to see that they had that sort of effect on you.
@@bigbone_99 I completely agree with you. I was a Marxist-Leninist, but now I see myself as a type of Leninist interested in Post-structuralism. I want to read deleuze, Derrida, Baudrillard and Foucault. The Autonomist and Post-Marxist tendencies in Europe seem absolutely interesting, and a mix of Marxism and post-structuralism is the best combination among the left.
@@tonacion Would you describe yourself as a Post-Marxist? also, what is your views on the questions I propose in the original post.
I am dying to watch that Miyazaki video but I'm guessing YT keeps taking it down because of Ghibli clips used :(
would love to watch a video of yours about Marshall Mcluhan. i know he's not a diciplend philosopher in any way, but i think his ideas proved their relevence over time.
am reading now "the gutenberg galaxy" and finding it fascinating and challenging in the best way.
thank's for another great video. love your channel
yessss!!! a Marshall Mcluhan vid would be great!
'disiplend' - disciplined
I love Rorty, Mirror as well as Contigency, Irony, Solidarity. I just love his brain.
I've just recently started to watch your video essays and find them amazingly informative(love the links to books, as well PDF's) as well intensely descriptive in "outing" Hicks as well Peterson's...........oh, let's call them, to be overly nice; "short comings", and I have only one questions as of right now, 1.) Does your title, or RUclips name, or whatever it is called, being that I am not really that hip on such things, other than the basic comments that I enjoy writing, but I digress, is that name "short" for the word "cuckold"? I was curious and looked up words that were called "portmanteaus", shortened or a combination of other words, you know "put-togethers", type of things? A linguistic type of mish-mash, such as smoke and fog, makes TA-DA: "smog"! Once again Wiki comes to the rescue.....oh yeah, what's your view on Wikipedia? I love it, but I am not as advanced as the "Cuck" Thanks and please keep up this awesome channel! I've learned a lot in a short period of time and that's great considering that I'm an atheist and were going to all die soon and time, once it runs out, never comes back, unless your crazy or something, believing in time travel machines and the like or blue waffles floating along in space, hey, that's more than one question! Or is it? Hey, that is.......never mind.
I can’t wait for the 2020 one
awesome video, just leaving a comment for the algorithm
Did the new video just get blocked? I was about to watch it
Do a whole video on difference between analytic/continental?
Have you read The Production of Space? I read it around the same time I read Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature and Capital vol 1 for the first time, and it made a big impact on me.
Thank-You!!!
Would you make a video about the difference between the analytic and continental philosophy?
McGrath taught me Heidegger last year at Memorial University of Newfoundland. Did a double take when you mentioned him; I didn't know he had written this book. Really brilliant guy.
Videodrome has you, long live the new *Bang* whoops
Yeeee, i needed this
Do you think it would be a good idea to major in philosophy? Or would you recommend studying it on your own?
patreon names made me like this video
Some interesting recommendations, I will definitely have to check some of them out. Is it heresy to mention that most of these books can be downloaded for free on libgen ??
Oh God! You ratted on us you Judas
Appreciate the ling feng Zheng footage
Love this channel but the low frequency of uploads leaves me craving for more. Anybody got recommendations of similar philosophy channels analyzing cultural phenomena through the post modern / socialist / what not lense?
Thanks!
Alright I really wanna watch that Miyazaki video, damn you RUclips!
Check his community section, it's available to torrent.
Hi Cuck, can you please do a review of the book W.I.L.D., What Is Life Definitively by A. Radical? I would love to hear your thoughts on it.
Thanks.
i tried to read marx. i didn't understand most of it. But thanks to people like you i do
You'll do yourself a big favor by reading some Lenin, particularly (but not limited to) The State and Revolution.
Of course, I have!
Well, that is great and makes me happy to hear. Subjectively, it seems to me that a lot of the people reading the thinkers you tend to discuss on this channel don't read Lenin & Stalin, and vice-versa, which makes for a gap between good philosophy and political thinking.
I read the unbearable lightness of being this year as well. It was so,don’t want to say influential, but informative on how i view social relationships. Like the second part of the book with sabina and franz,their relationship and the concept of a contextual dictionary was the most interesting part of it. The seeming conflict in how both of them view each other and the world. The opening though was the most memorable, that felt all too real. We truly do lose the weight of thing when time passes,that lightness as pleasurable as it seems to obscures our perception of something-the fundamental incompatibility of teresa and tomas but their ever recurring relationship being the one coming close to mind. Or maybe I fundamentally misunderstood the book and what i said was bullshit.
Hey, what's up with your video that got pulled down by YT due to DMCA?
I think its because he used too much Ghibli footage. I personally think this falls within the constraints fair use, but you tube is run by algorithms and it can't really discern. Good luck reaching a living human being to make a case though.
trailblazingfive go to the "community" tab on his channel, and you'll see his link to the direct upload of the video to google drive. that seems to be the only way to watch
Habe you read some of the work of Moishe Postone? What Do you think of it?
Oh damn can you send a downlaod of the ghibli heidegger video?
idk if its still being seeded but heres the magnet link i got it from
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:957770661a4c04247bd62e4145bd1f01a5fee204
Man can you change the colors of your new video like you did with the emoji movie?
What’s the anime in the background when he’s talking about the Marx Engels reader.
It's a Chinese propaganda anime called "the Leader." It's really, really bad.
Maybe read up on money from the left before considering a post-money setup. The historic context of money makes its importance for the next 100+ years all that more clear. See Mary Mellor "Money For The People" on the web or her book. Also consider contributions by Yanis Varoufakis or Steve Keen to understand from a dialectical framework the dysfunction of the neoclassical economic theory that informs the mainstream political and economic thinking today. It's an important frame that corrects some of the rhetorical overshooting Marx did when he was over-emphasizing the Ricardian economic anlaysis (which neoclassical economic thinking also heavily draws from to its peril). Going by Keen, anyway.
Can you do a video on Zigmunt Bauman Liquid Modernity??? Please!
Thank you! Oh, I wish every left-tuber did this. There is so much stuff to read I never know what to go for next.
Hello! Have you read Henry Staten's book "Wittgenstein and Derrida"? I think it's great.
Time for a 2021 edition
do a video of mainlander philosophy
(I will do this until you make a video)
Hey, what anime are the clips from during the Marx segment? Thanks! Great video
Pretty sure it's the Chinese anime called "The Leader"
God bless the People's Republic of China for making this show
Is that "Discreet Music" by Brian Eno playing in the background?
I am not very well educated on Kant, but how can Kant be Cartesian, in the sense mentioned in the video that the subject perceives an object, and an Idealist at the same time?
i watched radical reviewer does that count
"Philosophy doesn't help us in any way; it doesn't give us any guidelines. It only sharpens and strengthens the thinking mechanism". UGK
I’m familiar with Rorty, but never read him. I’ll check him out.
Thanks :)
I ended up buying the Marx and Engels reader and I dont regret it at all
Have you read the zen buddhist poet Thich Nhat Hanh? Zen is fascinating for me as I try understanding it eventhough I know it is ungraspable and unknowable. But when I meditate I feel it instead and it has helped me a lot, with depression and anxiety. It has helped me with many relationships and to be more compassionate. As a solarpunk anarchist it makes sense to me. Heidegger was inspired by zen and taoism but westernized it and willingly hid these influences by also using his opaque style. See ZEN IN HEIDEGGER’S WAY
by David Storey who posits that 1) Zen is uncompromisingly nonmetaphysical; 2) its discourse is poetic and non-rational; and 3) it aims to provoke
a radical transformation in the individual, not to provide a theoretical proof or
demonstration of theses about the mind and/or the world. I think Spinoza is fascinating also. And how about Bataille? Have you read him?
are you gonna try to repost the video that got the copyright strike?
What happened to Chinese with socialist characteristics
Chinese Marxist Students-activists are imprisoned by the Chinese Communist Party.
Account for Comment
It’s amazing that kind of contradiction hasn’t obliterated the world.
@@Lightwolf234 Not exactly. Communism is not an ideology or dream in that part of the world during the 30s to 90s. It is a propaganda election message. Vote (with guns) for my party and see this new world we bring. It is going to better than the present (old corrupted republic). Once that is done, Pigs became humans and humans pigs. Hard to tell which is which. So a bunch of students with ideas = new contestants. Solution = destroyed them for powet.
Are you talking about that Patreon guy?
i changed my patreon name to "george soros"
the music and the the sound of your voice are jarring af.
But I enjoy none the less.
Make the Analytic vs Continental video!
I keep trying to get into Capital, and I keep bouncing off of it. I can see it, I can appreciate the theory, it's just so dense....
David harveys companions make it easier. He also has video lectures online.
I'm a philosophy student in Poland. To simplyfy it drastically, we have been influenced mostly by German philosophers (phenomenology, dialectic materialism, existentialism, idealism, political philosophy in a broad sense - you name it) throughout the last century, while also having a bunch of outstanding classical logicians and onthologists on our own and obviously having ongoing adventure with the French (well, I'm 'early' Heidegger guy, don't ask me). It always gets me feeling kind of confused or even embarrased when somebody pulls out the 'analitic-continental' argument, to the extent I couldn't even imagine non-Anglo-Saxon writing on this very topic.
Didn't wanna be mean. This distinction just seems so clearly unjust and you don't hear or see it anywhere else from some meme pages or whatever. Always thought it's specifically English, considering longlasting historical lack of popularity of anything that isn't logic or empiricism out there.
What an intro
Someone wrote about John Maus :o
Cuck : this would require us crawling out of our minds”
Psychedelics: hold my beer
Just a note on eternal recurrence with respect to your fiction novel. Nietzsche didn't say that all things did that, returned infinitely and eternally such that time is a circle, he instead put a similar notion through the mouthpiece of Zarathustra because he knew it was not a notion he could seriously put forth in his own name. Whether or not he believed it himself is unknown, it was simply a thought experiment he posed, for readers to gauge whether, when confronted with a daemon, would curse the daemon or thank him upon hearing this news. Given that the standard idea is simply the one you expressed in the video, that all events only happen once and never again, Nietzsche thought to propose this idea to give the thought that even though your awareness of each moment is finite, and often we do everything we can to push through many moments so that we may never have to experience them again, he is asking with this, "What if you cannot do that really, what if every moment you will instead experience an infinite many times, how does this change your perception and how does this change how you act?" With all due respect, I do not think this was relayed effectively or accurately in the video.
How exactly is Rorty's response to modern western philosophy any different from Heidegger's notion of truth as aletheia versus a productionist metaphysics view of truth as correspondence?
Hey! Please answer my comment it is really REALLY important. Can you please make a broad introduction about manuel delanda's a thousand years of non-linear history? I have read it but i can't make people read it. I don't have any source of communication power like you do with your channel. Basically what he does is takes deleuze's thought to a much much clearer and broader area. He seeks 3 dimensions of history which is geological, linguistic, and biological he makes it in very very unantropocentric point of view which is insane and very informative. Also, i don't have time for making a broad video about it just to understand all of its concepts. Please help me and your other viewers with it. Also one more thing to add, he basically combine continental philosophy with analytic philosophy. You should really check that out. His knowledge is ridicoulus be ready for that either :)))
They keep blocking your video on Miyazaki!
Went on goodreads for "Beyond Human Rights" and found "Mein Kampf" under "readers also enjoyed"...