RTX 4060 vs RTX 3060 vs GTX 1080 Ti (Benchmark in 9 Games at 1440p)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 июл 2024
- #rtx4060 #rtx3060 #gtx1080ti
Compare this and more GPU benchmarks on my website:
teflonstestbench.com/benchmarks
Testing the RTX 4060 8GB, the RTX 3060 12GB and the GTX 1080 Ti 11GB in 9 games and benchmarks at 1440p (QuadHD) to see which one is the fastest. Showing temperature, core usage, power draw and much more data in real time. Extra Details and Information about the tests and system in the intro of the video.
Time spans and games Tested:
00:00 Intro & Test System
00:48 Cyberpunk 2077
01:57 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
03:15 Metro Exodus
04:50 Far Cry 5
05:53 Red Dead Redemption 2
08:06 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
09:31 Forza Horizon 5
11:04 Horizon Zero Dawn
14:01 Time Spy
16:12 Test Results
Contact: teflongrhq@gmail.com
Donate: www.paypal.com/paypalme/Teflo...
Music:
Song: Rogers & Dean - No Doubt [NCS Release]
Music provided by NoCopyrightSounds
Free Download/Stream: ncs.io/NoDoubt
Watch: • Rogers & Dean - No Dou...
Track: Deflo & Lliam Taylor - Reflections [NCS Release]
Music provided by NoCopyrightSounds.
Watch: • Deflo & Lliam Taylor -...
Free Download / Stream: ncs.io/DLTReflectionsYO 
Наука
i upgraded my 1050 ti build to a 4060 build and tbh i don't hate it since low power consumption and i can run well everything maybe the price is a bit high but i think it is worth it if u want something that runs good and dosn't eat power like a monster really happy with it
I'm upgrading from a 1050 ti to a 3060 on Thursday. I got a deal for it though, a 3060 for 175 usd brand new I don't think is half bad. I know the performance isn't great but 12GB of VRAM buys some future proofing.
@@_gr1nchh congrats man, and something is something, a upgrade from a 1050ti to that is a really nice thing, if u play 1080p then u don't need to worry much for future proofing
@@deniss0072 Yeah I can move down. I'll mostly be doing single player stuff in 1440p. I'm ok with low/medium settings as it will mostly just be single player stuff and some eSports which are low anyways for higher refresh rate. I'm just happy to have something that can run games. I wanted to play Helldivers 2 and it's just not really good to play on a 1050 ti at all.
Thanks for your work.
aaah the Epic 1080Ti aka the Last Flagship that was worth the price at launch , btw you can bet that it can perform waaaaay better if Ngreedia didnt gimp its performance soo much
Agree 100% was one of the best cards to be released by Nvidia at it's time and price, and is still kicking. Tho yeah, they basically killed it with the drivers not giving it any attention, it is such a shame as the architecture is really good and could still play games great, like the 1070s and 1080s
just buy amd? a 6700xt is an upgrade from a 1080ti in every way or if you have the money you can go 7900xtx
Both companies have good and bad products, it's not about not buying one ever again, tho to be honest Nvidia seems to be the one that is the most out of touch with their products, and by a good margin. The RX 6700 XT is a really good product, is efficient, has a good amount of VRAM and a really good spicing and for me is better than the equivalent from nvidia, way better, tho the RX 7900 series I think are not as good generally, but I haven't studied them a lot.
@@teflonstestbench I'd imagine just like the rtx 3090 and the titan rtx before it every card with 24gb of vram is gonna hold up for a long time if you're willing to drop settings
Yeah it was ahead of its time
The music in the Far Cry sequence is bangin
i also really love it
gtx 1080 ti is a hell of a gpu released back in 2017 like wow dude
pls put the recent price and the GB on the thumbnail elplsty
I don't think the current price could be a good idea as it changes a lot and depends on the country, but I'll start putting the VRAM as that would make a lot of sense, thanks :)
Can you play the cyberpunk 2077 with ray tracing enabled using a 1080?
Yes and No. In theory Nvidia enabled ray tracing on 1000 series cards on a driver when they launched the RTX series, so you should be able to play it at 2 fps or something xD
But otherwise they can't do ray tracing. That's why I trust them without ray tracing and then do a separate video with the cards that can do ray tracing and only testing them with ray tracing enabled on compatible games.
Nvidia did enable DXR ray tracing on GTX cards above the GTX 1060. It's really only a marketing trick to let GTX players see what they are missing out on. Most GTX cards can't run RT at playable framerates without some heavy sacrifices. The 1080 might be able to play Cyberpunk with RT reflections on, using FSR at 30+ fps, but even then, it's not much of an experience.
On my own 1660 Super I decided to try RT overdrive. Big mistake. It took playing the game at 240p for it to actually have a decent framerate.
So to answer your question, no, but actually yes.
So what I am seeing. No sense to upgrading my 1080 TI. As the performance upgrade is minimum at best. Not a single game has a 20% improvement. Guess I will wait tell card quality improves. Hoping for at less a 50% improvement. Though my card might die from old age before we get a decent improvement of performance.
Yup, the GTX 1080 ti holds up really well, no point in changing it, at least not for the entry level cards of newer generations. And about it dying, the 1080s are kinda efficient for a flagship so they won't degrade as much as the current flagships that have 300-500w running through them, so just watch the temps and clean it from time to time and it should be good for a lot more time.
@@teflonstestbench Nice. Well I keep good care of my card. I just wish they would build better cards. It been 3 generation and still the 1080 TI is holding up strong.
It's not about the cards, but more about the games. If you think about it graphics haven't advanced much in the last 5-10 years, so a top of the line GPUs of that time is good for 1080p gaming now. That's why now they are pushing for ray tracing and 4k gaming and high fps, but if you don't care about that a 1080ti or card of that performance level will be enough to play well optimized games at high quality at 1080p
I have a 1080 adavnaced strix 8gb and it holds very well paired with 7700k both are overclocked playing on 1080p in my garage setup .. when I get kicked out for being loud I play 1440 using a 3080 ti .. but that 1080 holds up very well .. don’t kind playing on either .1080s were prob the best designed gpu yet .
How sad is it that in three hardware generations, the 60 class card's raw performance is only 10 FPS faster on average, and is slower in the one percent lows because of memory bandwitdh constraints?
You can shove AI as a miracle cure for losing raw performance, but not while you simultaneously gut memory bandwidth
To be honest, i really wished Nvidia kept on doing the GTX series along with the RTX series, and many people agree. For example, the RTX line ups (usually) start at stuff like, 2060,3050 (only exception), and 4060. Why not make stuff like GTX versions of those cards starting before 60 or 50 or whatever, like a GTX 4050 or something, it would be quite awesome, just scale down the specs of it according to the number like every manufacturer does. Its not possible sadly, but it is something cool to imagine.
Yeah, I would love them to do that too, to have an entry level line up of cards like the 16 series or the 1050 and such, but they don't do it because of money, they know they can price an entry level card at 300$, call it a 4060 when it has the specs of a supposed 4050 and get away with it. And it sucks.
@@teflonstestbenchthing is, that's a problem with Nvidia. they simply don't realise they can make equally as mucch if not more if they made entry level cards at the price their supposed "budget killer" cards are at and just bump their already existing cards price by a bit. A lot more people would buy said new GTX card concept cards if that was true, and hereby make Nvidia more profit as they actually give as much performance as their name implies, and not a 4060 getting nearly outperformed by a 3060 ti
In my opinion, the best Nvidia generations were 7, 9, 10 and 30. 7 and 9 were just game changers at the time, but they don't hold up. GTX 10 series is still being used and kicking, GTX 1660 super and of the like are still insanely popular. And of course, the 30 series. The one to absolutely crash the GPU market, a $400 card demolishing the $1200 2080 TI, which was an absolute DEMON at the time. 30 series were a time period to remember, how Nvidia revolutionalised the GPU market more then they ever had.
The 40 series is kind of a joke compared to the 30 series, to be quite honest. Sure, they're better... But, they're considered a joke. they didn't produce the same hype, the 4060 is a complete joke, a humiliation, to the entire line up. at this point, maybe AMD will make a card better then Nvidia's counterpart, and that day which doesn't even seem very far from now, would end Nvidia's career as AMD would likely price it less, as that's their whole GPU brand.
I'd like to add some more to that.
Basically, i mean GTX cards before RTX card line ups as in... Hm, take the 3060 and 3070 line ups for this. The 3060 line ups was used for mainly budget builds, the 3070s lineup was used to take a step up from that. Mid range
A CPU version would be a ryzen 5 vs a ryzen 7 CPU. Ryzen 5 was the perfect middleground for decently budget builds, and the Ryzen 7 lineups were the perfect entry into higher end builds. And guess who sold more? The ryzen 5 3600 blew out the competition... (I worded that weird) so did the ryzen 5 5600, and i am pretty sure the ryzen 5 7600 did too.
What i mean is, if they made GTX cards that were entry level, with their lets say RTX 5060 being a good way to start off mid rannge builds, RTX 5070 a good way to get the upper of mid range builds or the lower of upper end builds, the 5080 the transition into higher end builds, and the 5090 the top of the top.
Perhaps the GTX lineups could be like this too.
Lets say GTX 5020 was the best entry level one for casual gaming, and some recent AAA titles, like a comfortable 1080p60 at high with some medium settings on even later AAA titles then the ones it was meant to be used for, and sweep the floor in terms of esports titles.
GTX 5030 used for the budget semi-casual players or enthusiasts, 1080p75 or something at high, and has some 1440p capabilities on the lower settings, and again, sweeps the floor with esports titles.
GTX 5040 being the first higher end budget one, able to comfortably run high settings on 1080p and get comfortable FPS for AAA games for a while, and run 1440p medium same thing, but probably switch to 1440p low on later AAA titles.
The GTX 5050 being the more so i suppose the real budget killer, comfortably running 120+ FPS at 1080p high on current AAA titles, make that 90+ on later AAA titles. It would likely be very capable of 1440p, and it would probably be quite populaar, nott saying the others wouldnt be popular, they likely would be just as if not aa bit less popular then the 5050
Of course, i am no GPU manufacturer, so some of my ideas may seem exaggerated, or not exaggerated enough lol, but i do think it would be awesome to have that.
And to make the wet dream wetter, they could add the super versions to the GTX line ups, sure its too much material to make them all, too expensive, too many cards... Yeah, but i did mention its only a wet dream.
I am wondering whether 4050 is faster than 1080ti?
it's slower. By like 46%.
Sometimes it seems to me that the RTX 4060 is just a joke from Huang. He released her just to laugh.😂
The 3000 series is dead, my 4060 gives about 175 FPS in plague tale requiem with FG and DLSS on ultra settings, even the 3080 can't compete with that, note that the 3080 is about 320 watts and the 4060 is only 115 watts! I changed my 4060 to 3080 for more FPS, but I lost and regretted and got 4060 again, if you can show an example that 3080 gives about 170 FPS in plague tale requiem with ultra settings 🖐️😅
The big downside is the power consumption of the 1080Ti
why gtx 1080 ti here only 1860 mhz??
I down lock the 1080 ti a bit as this model I have has a lot of factory OC, but if you check any other 1080 ti running at stock they usually run around 1800 MHz of speed so that speed is good.
okay) my evga ftw3 version card work at 1960 mhz@@teflonstestbench
Yeah, but if you go to lower end cards like the blowers or most 2 fan versions they usually go at way lower speeds, that's why I decided to limit mine as well to show the general performance and not the oc and top tier versions performance
what is the performance of the 1080ti without down clock frecuency compared to RTX 4060?@@teflonstestbench
The version I have has extra tdp and extra factory OC, so I'm guessing that if you tune it and let it run at that extra speed you can maybe gain around 1-2% more performance at best.
1080 ti still worth 😳
The 3000 series is dead, my 4060 gives about 175 FPS in plague tale requiem with FG and DLSS on ultra settings, even the 3080 can't compete with that, note that the 3080 is about 320 watts and the 4060 is only 115 watts! I changed my 4060 to 3080 for more FPS, but I lost and regretted and got 4060 again, if you can show an example that 3080 gives about 170 FPS in plague tale requiem with ultra settings 🖐️😅
The thing is you are getting that with frame generation. So that means the visual quality is not the same. That can be a problem to a lot of people, me included as I can perceive when I'm playing with DLSS or FSR on as the details are severely affected, specially on the performance modes of dlss and framegen. And that without taking into account the visual bugs that create in some games.
Another problem is that most games won't have compatibility with that technology, so while at some games you can get a higher fps rate at others you are gonna have performance problems as you can not artificially improve the performance with framegen.
And the final problem is the latency. You are creating fake frames based on other rendered frames, that means that the created frames don't really happen in game and as such don't reflect the inputs you make ingame thus adding input lag. This is specially a problem at lower fps when this is a lot more noticeable.
Anyways if you like using framegen then good for you. But it's not free performance it has its drawbacks and it's not for everyone but if you are happy with the results and visual quality and experience playing then go for it. But don't sell it as a magical improvement, it's not for everyone and it's far from a perfect way to improve the gaming experience.
@@teflonstestbench I didn't encounter the problems you mentioned because I play offline and new games, and in my opinion, in terms of technology, power consumption, temperature, and price, 4060 is even better than 3080, at least it's not as bad as everyone says.
People say it's bad not for it's features but for it's price and deceptive naming. It is an RTX 4050 in essence but named as a 4060 and with the price of one. So it's true there are new stuff and it's really efficient but people just don't like getting the same stuff for more money. Also compared to second hand options it will loose vs an rtx 3070 in performance while the 3070 can be purchased for a lot lower in a lot of places in the second hand market. So seeing that in previous generations the leap in price/performance was that big is understandable to see the RTX 4060 as a bad product.
If you look at the power consumption, the 1080 can never be stock!
The thing with this generation of cards is that there where two tiers: the ones with the default Nvidia board that had a turbine design and lower clocks and power and the custom designs that had more power and clocked way higher close to 2000mhz that's why I had to down clock this one a bit. Also this model had extra power but limiting that might affect each game differently so I decided to just address the clocks a bit. But the card is running 100% with out of the box values and only with a -50 margin at clock speeds.
Look at the power usage and think twice is ity realy a ripoff
That is the only good point is has, but compared to an RX 6600 XT or RX 7600 for example that should give a close performance, it is 50w less but at a 50-100$ price difference, even more if you get an RX 6600 XT on the second hand market
Not really sure what you're tryin to say🤔🤔
bro if u r gaming, who tf looks at GPU power usage if u have like a 650 psu. U gna be paying 3 dollars extra a month who cares
4060 is such TRASH. The 3060Ti runs faster. Its amazing how well the 1080Ti holds up.
At least the RTX 4060 is efficient, tho I'll be testing it vs the RTX 3060 ti pretty soon to see how it goes, but for it's price I agree I was expecting more.
@@teflonstestbench Right. For a generational leap tho it really is awful. 3060Ti is faster than a 2080 Super yet a 4060Ti barely beats out the 3060Ti? What the hell Nvidia. They even tried comparing a 4060 to the 1060. Why, just why. Power efficient is one thing but this performance? Nah...
Yup, it's impossible to justify, what I think they did is just level up all their tiers, so this RTX 4060 should be an RTX 4050, that would fit with the generational leap we have been getting and would also match the kind of chips they are using on each one. But it's a shame they get away with it, and even more how overpriced they are. I feel scammed having to pay 300€ for a 4060 right now, and even more as the lineup goes up, like the RTX 4060 TI is just stupid, and the 4060 TI 16GB even more so with an absurd bottleneck on the VRAM buffer. And don't get me started on VRAM on Nvidia's side xD
But AMD is also playing this game a bit too, the RX 7600 is a rebranded RX 6600 XT, tho at least it's not that expensive.
@@teflonstestbench Right?! The actual pricing of the 40 series, how they advertise it, etc. It is beyond greedy. They're basically forcing you to only play games that have FG. I got my 3060Ti for $400 during the chip shortage. I had a 1050Ti prior so it was a massive leap for me. Like honestly I only hit my vram limit ONCE and that's because I was benchmarking Wolfenstein 2 on max, so it's really not a concern for me, but seriously the 4060Ti should have been 10-12gb and at least 30% faster. It really is a 4050Ti in sheep's clothing. I remember when the 1080Ti was over 40% faster than a 1080. If Nvidia keeps this garbage up then 3060Ti may be my last Nvidia GPU. I already abandoned Intel for AMD in CPUs, the R5 5600X is a monster and perfect pairing to 3060Ti. I love DLSS upscaling but FG is a scam through & through.
@dapoculos13 Yup, the RTX 3060 TI is a good card, for me the best of that generation and right on the limit for the VRAM capacity, 8GB can still work for 1080p and some 1440p, exactly what that card is designed to. But I don't understand having a 4070 with 12GB, like for now it's not that bad but for the future is horrible. Ask is happened with the RTX 3080 and 3070 ti, that VRAM is simply not enough. And if you loon abck it shows, a beefy VRAM buffer with a good amount of ram let's the card stay relevant for way longer as it did with the 2080 ti and 1080 ti. AMD seems to understand that and that's why the 6800 is such a good card. I've been using Nvidia most of the time but I might change to AMD soon, drivers are better features are not that bad and with Fluid Motion Frames you are not gonna really need Nvidia's frame generation. But we'll see, maybe Intel will get into the fight soon. But I would really love to see more love to the entry level cards, I miss the times when we got the 1600 series or the 1050/1050 ti/1060 type of cards. Cheap, good amount of vram, basic card for gaming. Not extra cores, expensive features or nonsense. People want a 100$ GPU, not a 300$ one that performs like the last generation one and adds cores and features that are not needed for most games.
Haha i wish to see the looks on noob's face when they heard that the result 4060 is from overclocking and there should be no difference than a 3060 in terms of factory performance 😂
What do you mean? The card is not overclocked and it's running as it comes from the factory
@@teflonstestbench then tell it to benchmark lower than 115w tdp, 125w tdp is not the factory's settings
It is running at that tdp, but cards can peak a little bit more than the tdp, around 10w and more for the most power hungry so this is the normal behaviour.
@@teflonstestbench but then it's no longer a valid/fair benchmark if the other generation GPU wasn't doing the same "peak a little more" when you are benchmarking them.
If they're all doing the same, allowed boths to "peak a little more". The result will be a 4060 are having the same performance as a 3060, and those other cards will perform even better that it seems in the previous benchmark. Stretching the scores even further between 4060 and other cards.
*That "peaking a little more" is not gonna void the fact that this is "overclocking".
That peak is the default behaviour of all Nvidia cards. All of them will peak a little bit more momentarily over their tdp. Basically all the cards I test I let them at their factory behaviour and configuration, and only lower the tdp to the default values on those that have a board design with extra tdp.
1080to consuming the power for 2 4060 and barely keeping up bruh
It is 7 years old and was only about double the price of the 4060 all that time ago. It was the best deal we have ever had.
@@danielthunder9876 I said that cuz still many people are buying that shit second hand and it's not even that worth it
@@Yeaitts depends on how much you pay for it, i've seen 1080ti for 100 euro whereas the 4060 costs 320
@@Yeaitts They go for 115 usd. rtx 4060 is 320. Sameish, performance, 3x the price. and who tf cares abt gpu power usage. I think ur justifying ur own purchase to urself lmao
@@ihavenoidea4727 I don't have either. Just got a 2050 laptop. But I've always been curious about the tech out there
1080ti is still a beast