The TRUTH About S-400 & ATACMS: Who’s the WINNER?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 фев 2025
  • The TRUTH About S-400 & ATACMS: Who’s the WINNER? - Dive into the high-stakes rivalry in modern warfare! On one side, Ukraine, backed by Western allies, wields the ATACMS-a long-range missile for precision strikes. On the other, Russia showcases its powerful S-400 system, blending Soviet legacy with advanced tech to counter threats. Who will gain the upper hand? Will sheer firepower beat advanced precision, or will technology be the ultimate edge? Let's find out!
    01:00 - S-400 TRIUMF VS ATACMS
    04:14 - HOW IT WORKS IN REAL COMBAT?
    Explore more in-depth insights on our website: defensefeeds.com
    Sources: pastebin.com/N...
    Subscribe Now :
    / @military-tv

Комментарии • 98

  • @kamilhorvat8290
    @kamilhorvat8290 19 часов назад +49

    Who's writing the script? Kick him out and hire someone better. Since when is mach 2.5 faster than mach 3 ?

    • @lolocemoipopo7537
      @lolocemoipopo7537 19 часов назад +8

      In fact S400 speed is 6.2 according to WikiCia

    • @tomcat9112
      @tomcat9112 15 часов назад +3

      there are 3 type of s400, 1 mach 3, the other mach 6 or 7, and the third mach 14.
      atacms is correct

    • @Etheldreda20
      @Etheldreda20 13 часов назад +2

      It is obviously AI this channel is that shiet

  • @ebenezernsubuga1352
    @ebenezernsubuga1352 19 часов назад +32

    The s400 that was destroyed in kursk was under maintenance plus the pantsir has dawned the atcams severe times. This annalysis us bullocks

    •  18 часов назад

      So is this.

    • @111076tom
      @111076tom 18 часов назад

      This is so amaturish I am ashemed to have wasted time on it.

  • @readyon3506
    @readyon3506 19 часов назад +24

    S-400 is the Goat

    •  18 часов назад +1

      You mean it might actually hit a goat , LOL, utterly Rubbish .

    • @GegeDxD
      @GegeDxD 18 часов назад

      Rubbish that regularly downing American projectiles. On the other side, go search how many videos about Patriot system destruction you'll find 😉

    • @AndriesDris
      @AndriesDris 16 часов назад

      So you mean to say atacm that are being intercepted are being dropped by Russian ghost?

    • @duran791
      @duran791 15 часов назад

      U just dumb

    • @BITStudioCode
      @BITStudioCode 11 часов назад +1

      It really is. Far range and high accuracy. The main reason why it had sometimes failed in ukraine is because US and NATO constantly flies spy planes and electronic warfare planes near ukraine and russia(like the RQ-4B and in critical moments give the s400 a sudden daze, causing the system to malfunction. This happens because russia lacks enough electronic warfare countermeasure units to deploy all across the battlefield. In the inner parts of ukraine where NATO jets cannot reach the S400 is doing perfectly fine and is doing an exquisite job downing atacms,jdams, HARM missiles, and much more. The main reason is that NATO EW drones and aircraft are scared of russian EW countermeasures like the murmansk-BN and the krasukha 4 that has been widely deployed there.

  • @kenkuntai
    @kenkuntai 18 часов назад +10

    the patriot is not even close to the s400 bro

  • @Cathayius-z6y
    @Cathayius-z6y 19 часов назад +41

    Most ATACMs used by Ukraine were intercepted by S400 and destroyed!!🤣🤣🤣

    • @MrRynev
      @MrRynev 18 часов назад +7

      exactly!

    • @lightbird27
      @lightbird27 17 часов назад +7

      There is also the jamming/spoofing systems employed by Russia. It drastically lowered it's precision.

    • @qwertyuiopasdfghjkl9959
      @qwertyuiopasdfghjkl9959 2 часа назад +1

      I oby tak dalej!👍. Zniszczcie to faszystowskie przekleństwo dla świata!👏

  • @bakrusochaitom6589
    @bakrusochaitom6589 18 часов назад +11

    Atacms win in propaganda video where as s400 won in real combat,war😅

  • @thomasbayer2832
    @thomasbayer2832 19 часов назад +15

    You are comparing apples to oranges!
    ORWSHNIK vs ATTACMS
    or ISKANDAR vs ATTACMS
    S400 is air defense!
    Besides, Russia already uses S500.

  • @ACNNOMOREBLUFF
    @ACNNOMOREBLUFF 15 часов назад +6

    This is full of misunderstanding of what is an air defense, it's caracteristics, and also why the Russians are constantly upgrading their systems. The S-400 no longer exist in Russia and have been replaced everywhere by the S-450 with longer range and much higer speeds. And you can always saturate any defense systems, even the best one, mith more targets that he can handle. So why Russians suffer sometimes losses, but at a huge price for the attackers. So even if some are destroyed, it's from far the best system around, and they also have the S-500 for high altitude targets and the S-550 to shoot down targets in SPACE. The shooting distance vary with models from 120 to 380Km and speeds froml 2.6 to 5.0 machs.

  • @Achilles-n4o
    @Achilles-n4o 13 часов назад +3

    In November 2021, the A-235 Nudol shot down the non-working Kosmos-1481 satellite at an altitude of about 550 kilometers, which became an absolute record for missile defense systems. The characteristics of the complex are classified - presumably, the A-929 rocket used in the installation can destroy satellites at an altitude of up to 1,000 kilometers.
    The Peresvet laser complex is capable of disabling space objects at a distance of up to 1.5 thousand kilometers.
    The S-500 can not only intercept ballistic missile warheads, but also hit low-flying spacecraft. Presumably, the guaranteed damage zone of the complex is about 800 kilometers.
    The S-550 anti-aircraft missile system (SAM), based on the S-500 Prometheus, became the world's first mobile specialized anti-missile and anti-space defense system. It is capable of effectively destroying intercontinental ballistic missiles.

  • @LegendJoe3063
    @LegendJoe3063 17 часов назад +6

    Garbage Hollywood weapons and LIAR western propaganda channel.😂😂😂😂

  • @VALMOX
    @VALMOX 10 часов назад +2

    Both vehicles are amazing, but I think it’s incorrect to compare these two models… More suitable to compare Iskander-M with ATACMS.
    Btw I made LEGO Iskander-M and ATACMS, check it out them, I hope you like it!🥰

  • @laithpignatt1060
    @laithpignatt1060 18 часов назад +1

    Pretty sure more patriots have been destroyed in this war than the S-400. Why hasn't Ukraine been able to destroy the Kursk bridge, which is defended by S-400 systems and more recently the S-500 system. The bridge has been stated to be one of the main targets of the war.

  • @vasanthkumar4983
    @vasanthkumar4983 19 часов назад +8

    Comparing surface to air and surface to surface system it's just bull shit comparison

  • @Blaster53
    @Blaster53 16 часов назад +2

    Wrong information, S-400 interceptor is flying with hypersonic speed up to 4.7 km/sec, depending of the type of interceptors.
    S-400 is used exclusively to protect very valuable targets. For protection of other possible targets Russians use S-300, Tor, Pantsir, Buk, and other short range systems.
    No ATACMS passed S-400 unless launcher was empty. There is simply no relevant comparison between ATACMS and S-300 because they have different purposes. However well over 80% of ATACMS were destroyed and that speaks volumes.
    Maximal speed of Oreshnik is Mach 15 which is more than 4 km/sec. Only very high speed can cause such damage even without explosive in warhead.

  • @RS-ICon
    @RS-ICon 19 часов назад +1

    This channel isn't bias, a reason why I love it. Truths and facts alone

  • @chandrashekharsawant9628
    @chandrashekharsawant9628 18 часов назад +3

    If the oreshnics didn't damage anything then it's speed must be quite slow, easy target for air defence.
    Why it was not intercepted.

    • @readyon3506
      @readyon3506 16 часов назад

      video maker is smoking crack

  • @BITStudioCode
    @BITStudioCode 11 часов назад

    S400 easily intercepting atacms should never be something that is seen as crazy. The Atacms has a fixed parabolic path it follows, making it really easy to target. And it travels at rather slow speeds compared to something like the kinzhal, which makes it even easier to hit.

  • @Achilles-n4o
    @Achilles-n4o 12 часов назад +1

    Iskander in Russia is not one, but two complexes with different characteristics and tasks. Thus, the Iskanedr-M is "charged" with a high-altitude, up to 50 kilometers, supermaneuverable quasi-ballistic missile 9M723 with the function of "invisibility". Its task is to bypass any missile defense system at speeds exceeding six sound levels. To reach it at the "fork" of heights from 20 to 50 kilometers. Modern Western air defense systems are practically unable to intercept it. For greater reliability, the rocket is coated with special radio-absorbing compounds and equipped with false targets. The effective range is up to 500 kilometers.
    The Iskander-M complex, which uses the R-500 cruise missile (launch range up to 500 km), has the task of hitting the enemy on an ultra-low trajectory, at an altitude of up to 6-7 meters above the ground. Which makes NATO apologists shudder. However, if the Iskanders are suddenly used in a complex, there is no point in shaking. Such a doublet of Russian "tacticians" is guaranteed to "roll out" any defensive area.
    The Iskander division's salvo is easily capable of destroying an entire US missile defense position area.

  • @ramnikjain5187
    @ramnikjain5187 16 часов назад +1

    What about destruction of Patriots by Iskander.

  • @MAK2607
    @MAK2607 19 часов назад +4

    2:43
    S400 travels at Mach 2.5, while atacms is little slower at Mach 3. Hmmm...
    Need to reschool myself. Unaware math, physics, & everything has been reversed

  • @CRA404462
    @CRA404462 19 часов назад +4

    This is so wrong in so many levels…

  • @Olivia-m8p3e
    @Olivia-m8p3e 19 часов назад +1

    Watching your channel is like a ticket to a world of fun and joy. Thank you for your creative and energizing work!💜🌆🥰

  • @MizMite2002
    @MizMite2002 19 часов назад +3

    NATO vs Russia. who is winning?

    • @mdalamnoor2160
      @mdalamnoor2160 19 часов назад +4

      Also russia

    • @GouSiam-t4l
      @GouSiam-t4l 19 часов назад

      Ukraine isn't NATO from the start but Russia invaded Ukraine because they're pushing for NATO membership n NATO is also considering Ukraine to be their member as a shield n offence platform to Russia that's why Russia invaded Ukraine

    • @GegeDxD
      @GegeDxD 18 часов назад +1

      It depends where the war would be. In Ukraine NATO cannot win, but can cause destruction and big losses on both sides.

  • @William-g6w
    @William-g6w 19 часов назад +4

    Where do u get ur information from?, be carful what u say Mr. Military TV (Hollywood) SHOW

    • @readyon3506
      @readyon3506 16 часов назад

      he is under the crack effect

    • @qwertyuiopasdfghjkl9959
      @qwertyuiopasdfghjkl9959 2 часа назад +1

      Chwała Militarny Tv! Jesteś wielki. Chwała Rosji🇷🇺. POZDROWIENIA OD POLSKI!🇵🇱 !!!

    • @William-g6w
      @William-g6w 2 часа назад

      Why you not comparing against the S500 hmmmm, S400 is better than all western defence systems, but the S500 well that's beyond the west my friend

  • @japhericncube4323
    @japhericncube4323 16 часов назад

    Then now we will wait to see Iakander Missile vs Patriot System pliz show us.

  • @floatingpoint5860
    @floatingpoint5860 16 часов назад

    but what about Tor m2 SAMs? Weren't they supposed to protect S-400 SAMs?

  • @josmith4626
    @josmith4626 15 часов назад

    Since when was Mach 3 slower than Mach 2.5 (2:41) in the video.

  • @atanasdimitrov8496
    @atanasdimitrov8496 18 часов назад +1

    Talking about comparing apples to oranges...

  • @ericsykes7458
    @ericsykes7458 18 часов назад

    Ukraine doesn't have enough atacms to have the upper hand.

  • @niyomwungerezacharie
    @niyomwungerezacharie 14 часов назад

    You're lying because ATACMS are compared with ISKANDER not S-400

  • @theninja3527
    @theninja3527 10 часов назад

    I heard 2 batteries of S-400 had been destroyed by ATACMS

    • @Achilles-n4o
      @Achilles-n4o 9 часов назад +1

      The dagger complex destroyed in 2023 , one electronic warfare system and 5 Patriots , with one blow , then in the same year 4 patriots , with one blow . Patriot fired 32 missiles at one dagger missile, and did not shoot down.

    • @theninja3527
      @theninja3527 8 часов назад

      @Achilles-n4o these all things you write I already know ok but this 👆 I think 2 batteries of S-400 had been destroyed

    • @Achilles-n4o
      @Achilles-n4o 7 часов назад

      There is zero evidence that it was the S-400. it is a fake and a deliberate stuffing of the CPSO. If it was the S-400, the fireworks would be huge. In the photos, there are no signs of the S-400 being present, the Ukrainian military needed to somehow show at least some success in order to ask for more missiles. so they fabricated this fake.
      fake propaganda is their job.

  • @mahendrabandaranayake2633
    @mahendrabandaranayake2633 14 часов назад

    S400 vs Patriot

  • @romeoaries7074
    @romeoaries7074 18 часов назад +1

    The worst video you've ever made

  • @AKSingh
    @AKSingh 19 часов назад +2

    So much falsehood 😂

  • @chadbernard2641
    @chadbernard2641 19 часов назад +2

    What a terrible video.

  • @yiannis.demetriou9696
    @yiannis.demetriou9696 11 часов назад

    Is this a trick question?
    Hahahaha. I would seriously take the older S300 than any Nato missile defense system

  • @watcher5729
    @watcher5729 13 часов назад

    S400 is AA system not ofensive.the iskendar looks more effecting in spotted duel launch
    seems tne winner in duel once spoted.then upgraded cheaper smerch is upgraded

  • @VladimirPutinSaysHello
    @VladimirPutinSaysHello 13 часов назад

    8:17 atacm get shot down 90% of the time

  • @Метатрон.25
    @Метатрон.25 16 часов назад

    Must be USAID sponsor

  • @johnshackleton323
    @johnshackleton323 16 часов назад

    S400. ❤❤

  • @MmatshweneMashiane
    @MmatshweneMashiane 8 часов назад

    Bias reporting won't get you anywhere

  • @vitaliy7417
    @vitaliy7417 14 часов назад

    Вы обсолютно не компитентны или спицально водите в заблуждения в этот раз вы получаете двойку.

  • @Emily-r9d4s
    @Emily-r9d4s 19 часов назад

    Each of your content is a masterpiece! Keep inspiring us with your creations!🐫🍾💙

  • @robercb77045
    @robercb77045 11 часов назад

    😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 I guess USAID still going

  • @danishjaved454
    @danishjaved454 5 часов назад

    Go and get graduate in defence first

  • @foshizzlfizzl
    @foshizzlfizzl 18 часов назад +1

    This video doesn't make any sense to me....

  • @musangtempur
    @musangtempur 13 часов назад

    Cmon s400 is equivalent patriot not atacms lol😂😂😂.......iskander is equivalent atacms

  • @fampiemesangare913
    @fampiemesangare913 15 часов назад

    😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 um the comedian turned politician mr Zelensky choses to turned his Ukraine into a testing ground for world weaponeries 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 ok almighty god is Russians once again defeating the Nazis-zelensky like they did with Nazis-Hitler thank you 🙏 Russians for your service to humanity across the world 🌎

  • @tedlaabebe6465
    @tedlaabebe6465 11 часов назад

    Biased repor!

  • @111076tom
    @111076tom 18 часов назад

    U amatures are herby unsubscribed.

  • @khrystleooo6994
    @khrystleooo6994 19 часов назад

    Russia sucks😂😂

  • @thezyxwv7488
    @thezyxwv7488 18 часов назад +1

    American technology is best that's why Ukrain lose 20% of its land if Russian technology will become better then all ukrain will be under Russia😂

  • @goodik4885
    @goodik4885 19 часов назад

    U.S.- 💪

  • @libana4081
    @libana4081 12 часов назад

    Anything about missiles Russia is ahead at least a century,remember the U2 plane that USSR shut down over Russia early 60’s,