“to take is a mistake” isn’t a good rule to follow. You should definitely analyze the situation but sometimes taking is the best move and if you follow that rule you’ll always miss it
We need more educational chess videos like this that teach general strategy rather than opening traps and rare tactics. This is what chess is all about.
I followed this golden rule and didn't take my opponent's pieces when I had chances. But it resulted with my opponent checmating me with all his forces.
You are heartly requested to make complete chess guide paving the way from beginner to mastery, as it will be liked by all the people from every nooks & corner of the country, even from abroad (I'm from Nepal ❤️)... Because you are one of the good tutor .. analysing & explaining every possible move from learner point of view. So please ...it will be the greatest contribution to the nation.
As a beginner chess player, this is absolutely true for me i also though of attacking with knight. Thanks for helping this advice will be useful for me :)
Also sir can you please make a video on how to win a loosing end game in chess. IF others want this video then please press the like button and show your support both to the Channel and to the comment...
I don’t know, his bishop is already much more dominant than yours and his knight is a little more dominant too. I’d say in this situation trading bishop for knight and knight for bishop is more advantageous for you than black. All you have to do afterwards is break down his pawn structure and you’ll gain the upper hand for the simple fact that overall you’re more develop.
OK here's the problem with saying that, most beginners will hear that and think that tree along is always a mistake and while in a complicated high tension situation, it usually is, some of them are afraid to trade pieces even when they gain an advantage. I was in a tournament yesterday and a player from a younger category had been offered a Quean trade when their opponent had less material and he should have taken the trade since it would have prevented any further tactics involving the opponent using that piece to regain an advantage but he didn't, and he also lost a rook to a pin by said Quean. When he was telling his coach how he lost the game, the coach asked him why he didn't trade Queans and he said "to take is a mistake". For reference, he was 15.
I'd sacrifice my bishop by first taking the knight and then, sacrifice the knight (not a 100% certain that the other player would want to take the knight or not), and move the pawn H forwards to block the queen.
G3 threatens queen. Another mistake people make us to focus on immediate threats, create more danger for the opponent and your pieces are safer--lol Nevermind that’s checkmate lol!!
it isn't so simple. there is a variation which also needs to be explored what if black takes the bishop on e3 hitting the rook. if white takes the queen you capture the rook attacking the queen. if white takes the knight you take white's knight and material is roughly equal getting a bishop, rook and knight, for a knight and queen. ignoring this possibility is why lower rated chess players never improve, they don't see the nuances in the position. they don't ask but what if my opponent doesn't obey my forcing moves?
I disagree with this example. Black activates a bishop, but then you get to trade off an inactive bishop for an active one, simplify the position, and pretty much kill any momentum black has.
Chess Talk: “Remember this golden rule, To take is a mistake”
Me: *Not taking a free Queen after his advice*
That only happens when you play opponent like me 😂
If you're playing good players, taking the queen is ALWAYS a trap 😭
There’s never going to be a free queen
Bottez gambit declined
@@vta0533 😂
Me who would literally move the pawn forward 💀
🤣🤣
thats a good strategy i think
same
Same so simple
Same
“to take is a mistake” isn’t a good rule to follow. You should definitely analyze the situation but sometimes taking is the best move and if you follow that rule you’ll always miss it
I'm glad you are explaining a grand Master the golden rules of the game 👍
The whole saying is to take is a mistake unless it damages your openents structure or imptoves your position
the point is to not snap take, but have those red lights flashing in your head to tell you to analyze the position.
Completely agree with you.
Yup. Just moving the pawn up to h3 was not a bad move either, but depends!
Rephrase this entire thing by emphasizing "Keep the tension". That, is a phenomenal lesson
Yes, that's also a good way of putting it!
Jeetendra: "To take is a Mistake"
Mikhail tal: **Downfall**
Man just threatened tal's entire carrer
Lol 😂 😆
"to take is a mistake"
Not when my opponent blunders the queen💀
Instructions unclear: Lost all my pieces and got checkmated by 4 queens
We need more educational chess videos like this that teach general strategy rather than opening traps and rare tactics. This is what chess is all about.
Finally....keep making more shorts like this 😍😍
same for me.
I followed this golden rule and didn't take my opponent's pieces when I had chances. But it resulted with my opponent checmating me with all his forces.
bF4 to protect the pawn in H2, then H3 to force the knight to escape and bG5 to trap the queen
"The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting"
-Sun Tzu
I'm REALLY liking these SHORT takes.
You are heartly requested to make complete chess guide paving the way from beginner to mastery, as it will be liked by all the people from every nooks & corner of the country, even from abroad (I'm from Nepal ❤️)... Because you are one of the good tutor .. analysing & explaining every possible move from learner point of view.
So please ...it will be the greatest contribution to the nation.
& if there is any course from you I'm not acknowledged about...then please let me know.🙂
Thanks sir for this amazing Rule
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Thanks for the great advice 🙋♂️
1M soon !!!
I like the 'keep the tension', followed by moving the piece and removing the tension.
Words are fun.
You are the best chess tutor... And your videos are also the best 👌🏻...
As a beginner chess player, this is absolutely true for me i also though of attacking with knight.
Thanks for helping this advice will be useful for me :)
to take is not a mistake..... actually it depends the situation...you have to know when to take and when to not
Give the link of your chess board please
You can get it here: amzn.to/34w0ysX
Normally we try to avoid complex situations so we play take - take.
"To take is a mistake."
Me who ignored my opponent blundering his Queen
The bishop 1018272e726 miles away
This is a brilliant axiom and example
Most of you...
No. I would pressure the Queen by pushing the pawn to the Queen to make it move back.
This is also good move. I like your way of explaining things.
For ghotam this would be a chapter of danger levels
even h3 is a decent move because it immediately diffuses that threat of Qh2# which can equalise the game and can go either side right
Rather than it i would just move pawn from h2 to h3 it would be much better than wasting so many moves.
Plz make a video on magnus vs pragnananddha
Chess Talk: To take is a mistake
Me: Immediately losing to everyone
Also sir can you please make a video on how to win a loosing end game in chess.
IF others want this video then please press the like button and show your support both to the Channel and to the comment...
Another move that can be played is bishop to f 6
Prevent queen from attacking
Just move that pawn on the left one step forward
Great lesson
Chess Talk: “Remember this golden rule, To take is a mistake”
Me: got checkmated by a pawn which I hesitated to take :-)
Sir please given more information about chees
9.99 ... 1Million soon... Congratulations 🥳🤩🎉
"To take is a mistake"
*Me casually not takes pawn and mate him but just retreats instead*
Sir you are teaching very 👍👍
pov: your opponent blunders a free queen
*you remember the golden rule*
*you blunder your queen*
*he takes your queen*
You: 😐
Love your videos sir❤️
Your videos help me very much
Me after my opponent hangs a queen
"To take is a mistake" "To take is a mistake" "To take is a mistake"
I lose more pieces to undeveloped bishops then fully developed bishops. I just never see it coming.
I will prefer more shorts in future
I don’t know, his bishop is already much more dominant than yours and his knight is a little more dominant too. I’d say in this situation trading bishop for knight and knight for bishop is more advantageous for you than black. All you have to do afterwards is break down his pawn structure and you’ll gain the upper hand for the simple fact that overall you’re more develop.
Totally agree +1
Great lesson!
Amazing background you have there
I didn't even notice knight was there. I would have simply push the pawn
"Knight takes, bishop takes."
Me : I don't even know there's a bishop
This helped a lot
I liked! That's a good advice.
Instructions unclear opponent is up 9 queens 2 rooks bishops and knights😢
Loved the tip
Opponent hangs his queen. “ to take is a mistake “
Exactly lol he just wanted to make a any dumb quote
Make this kind of more videos 🙃
Please make video on vishy anand's game
Advance the last white pawn simple
Lol
I hate the bar on the right showing who the computer thinks is winning.
OK here's the problem with saying that, most beginners will hear that and think that tree along is always a mistake and while in a complicated high tension situation, it usually is, some of them are afraid to trade pieces even when they gain an advantage. I was in a tournament yesterday and a player from a younger category had been offered a Quean trade when their opponent had less material and he should have taken the trade since it would have prevented any further tactics involving the opponent using that piece to regain an advantage but he didn't, and he also lost a rook to a pin by said Quean. When he was telling his coach how he lost the game, the coach asked him why he didn't trade Queans and he said "to take is a mistake". For reference, he was 15.
I'd sacrifice my bishop by first taking the knight and then, sacrifice the knight (not a 100% certain that the other player would want to take the knight or not), and move the pawn H forwards to block the queen.
Sir, next time can you please make a video on what should white play after the following continuation '1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6'?
The things we learn from your videos ar truly amazing sir. Thank You for sharing this knowledge with us 🙏🙏
Sir I just wanted to tell you that you have inspired me into playing chess
Black bishop g4 can be taken by white bishop e2 so i do think rather than check mate take knight and later bishop so both are equal
To take is a mistake, especially when you're allowing play from your opponent.
If you find a good move go ahead for a better move
Sir how about h3 ?
Can be a good move for short term but after 3-4 turns the result would be the same
I think black would exchange knights and then develop the bishop leading to an equal position
Softens the king side, knight can just jump back and the position would still be equal
G3 threatens queen. Another mistake people make us to focus on immediate threats, create more danger for the opponent and your pieces are safer--lol Nevermind that’s checkmate lol!!
What about bishop in F4, then H3 to threaten the knight and bishop in G5 to trap the queen?
chess talk:"remember the golden rule,to take is a mistake
me:not taking a free knight that if i take its a checkmate after his advice
Maybe something like "to trade won't always amaze" or some shit would be a safer rule to follow😂
Keep making more shorts :))
What will you do if your knight is not in the e5 square?
I’ll remember that rule only when my opponents queen is hanging
Sees an open peice remembers the rule "to take is a mistake"
My jackass just moved the pawn infront of the king ☠️
I agree that knight to f3 is a better move, but how is the position equal when the knight take removes the immediate mate threat with the black queen?
Pls provide me the link of this board which u used in beginning
unless the opponent leaves it hanging
A question….what if we exchange bishops after exchanging knights???
Now you have figured out the algorithm
Sir can you make next video of chess universe
Amazing 👍👍
Thank you very much for all he videos . It is very very very useful sir. Without you, I was not in the chess life. Brilliant and stupendous!
My golden rule-
Don't play the every obvious move you opponent wants you to play!
it isn't so simple. there is a variation which also needs to be explored what if black takes the bishop on e3 hitting the rook. if white takes the queen you capture the rook attacking the queen. if white takes the knight you take white's knight and material is roughly equal getting a bishop, rook and knight, for a knight and queen.
ignoring this possibility is why lower rated chess players never improve, they don't see the nuances in the position. they don't ask but what if my opponent doesn't obey my forcing moves?
“To take is a mistake”
En passant (forced):
Who said that en passant is forced 😂
My biggest mistake was moving queen to pawn for free meal or didn't notice when queen vs queen without backup
"To take is a mistake"
Me: Guess I'll lose
"mishtake"
I disagree with this example. Black activates a bishop, but then you get to trade off an inactive bishop for an active one, simplify the position, and pretty much kill any momentum black has.
To take is a mistake.
Me 13 moves into a game, having not taken a single piece: *This game is so easy now*
To take or not to take that is the question
Me: Bruh just take the pawn to h3
In the first senario we also have our bishop
But for intermediate players, for 3 min games, its good to take and trust your endgame skills are better than the opponents'
I will exchange the bishops and move the h pawn forward. To take is not always a mistake.
Lol the bishop was crying
After Qh4 we can also move BF4
Good one
How about pushing one square of pawn in front of rook to challenge the knight and guarding vulnerability to Queen.