Lets ignore all the obvious flaws and try to find a meaning in it: A typical server rack has a weight limit somewhere above 1000kg. That would be the energy equivalent of 10^20 Joules. Im not sure how much engergy the AI might be worth, but it will definitely be absolutely insignificant. And thats the moral of the story. AI is cool and all, but it won't solve our issues.
: HILARIOUS! [I think they want a short-way to connect things they learned about, like that is the whole-picture. I saw the video, I think that this is making fun of. Honestli, kind of like the einstein-people to some degree for me, but I know why that stuff works statisticalli for their systems that they build, and that is not the wrong-part. That is how their systems basicalli work, but also I found a grammar-component of making things factual. I like my work with making aether a physical-di-mension, the Michaelson-Morley experiment confirms that the aether moves with the earth because the aether is the earth, like the gravity of the earth and the magnetism of the earth and the mass-particles in some type of condensed-standing-wave of this material, and temperature being a frequency of the condensed aether knitted together with itself. Mine works and I have had the top-scientist in the world, : Postmaster-General: Russell-Jay: Gould tell me that my work is correct, and I already knew.]
[Why would you include AI (Artificial Intelligence) in a equation for energy as you say? I don't get the joke. Did someone say that Artificial Intelligence will fix how Einstein's-Equation for when it's wrong? What they call Einstein's-Equation has mass(aether^2÷length^3), pressure/stress(aether^2÷length^4÷turn^2) (43,200seconds=pi-radians) and maybe temperature with the pressure, power(aether^2÷length÷turn^3), momentum-concentration(aether^2÷length^5÷turn) & energy-concentration(aether^2÷length^4÷turn^2). & I had to find the di-mensions of physical-constants because my university told me that there are seven-base-units and I knew there had to be connections between some of them. So I started with lectricians, fining charge(coulomb) as aether÷length & magnet(weber) as aether÷turn. I view you linked an aether-song. Aether comes from the sun in di-rect-character-form, making the voltage, charge & movement in the same di-rection alike what happens in between the plates of a capacitor. The aether pours down like a river that rushes past us while we stand on grating with a pressure like riding the surface & when we step off of grating start at zero-speed and the river forever gives us it's velocity on the surface based on how long we ride and get sped up. But I think there is more-things that the aether can form into than those forms and if those are happening near us, they might be a part of what makes something move, which seems to be their point. Do you think that the einstein equation shows everything? Do you think the einstein equation is correct in the concept of curved-space when length is defined as the di-stance between two-points? I think they might be lining up their coordinates with some alternate-lines of force rather than the kind that we view with metal-filings over a magnet. I never thought his equation had all the things though. But do you think their way of thinking can show how magnets, charges, temperatures and masses work? I don't think that the General-Theory of Relativity was made for Power-Lines. For Power Lines I needed to find Charles P. Steinmetz's-Work.]
@@buttersquids [What type of question is that? One time I was sitting in high-school-chemistry and this kid walked into the class and said "where is the mr. teacher?"" type-stuff and then we didn't say anything and looked over at the teacher getting something out of his desk and then he just said "okay" with a big-o and walked away. It was so funny.]
@@buttersquids [Do you know the joke? Can you tell me so I can know if this is funny? Who said stuff like this? Did you want to have a conversation with me? I guess you can at my website. But my questions were for the maker of this video technicalli, although questions from other-viewers are also welcome with me.]
@@buttersquids [I think I found the Joke if it is the Lex Fridman AI Podcast. I will listen to it, and I will get back with my say on whether I think this is funny, which I just chose to speak about.]
@@buttersquids [I can't figure out how it's suppose to be funny. I saw a couple minutes of the Lex Fridman and they were talking about quantum which einstein people keep saying doesn't mix. I saw a artificial einstein video but that was just talking about computers doing general relativity all on their own, I think.]
I thought it ll be Taylor expansion of special theory energy with gamma. It can be expressed as a summ of mc2+...
The algorithm has blessed me today 🙏
Lets ignore all the obvious flaws and try to find a meaning in it:
A typical server rack has a weight limit somewhere above 1000kg. That would be the energy equivalent of 10^20 Joules. Im not sure how much engergy the AI might be worth, but it will definitely be absolutely insignificant.
And thats the moral of the story. AI is cool and all, but it won't solve our issues.
I'm so glad I've found these videos
: HILARIOUS! [I think they want a short-way to connect things they learned about, like that is the whole-picture. I saw the video, I think that this is making fun of. Honestli, kind of like the einstein-people to some degree for me, but I know why that stuff works statisticalli for their systems that they build, and that is not the wrong-part. That is how their systems basicalli work, but also I found a grammar-component of making things factual. I like my work with making aether a physical-di-mension, the Michaelson-Morley experiment confirms that the aether moves with the earth because the aether is the earth, like the gravity of the earth and the magnetism of the earth and the mass-particles in some type of condensed-standing-wave of this material, and temperature being a frequency of the condensed aether knitted together with itself. Mine works and I have had the top-scientist in the world, : Postmaster-General: Russell-Jay: Gould tell me that my work is correct, and I already knew.]
[Why would you include AI (Artificial Intelligence) in a equation for energy as you say? I don't get the joke. Did someone say that Artificial Intelligence will fix how Einstein's-Equation for when it's wrong? What they call Einstein's-Equation has mass(aether^2÷length^3), pressure/stress(aether^2÷length^4÷turn^2) (43,200seconds=pi-radians) and maybe temperature with the pressure, power(aether^2÷length÷turn^3), momentum-concentration(aether^2÷length^5÷turn) & energy-concentration(aether^2÷length^4÷turn^2). & I had to find the di-mensions of physical-constants because my university told me that there are seven-base-units and I knew there had to be connections between some of them. So I started with lectricians, fining charge(coulomb) as aether÷length & magnet(weber) as aether÷turn. I view you linked an aether-song. Aether comes from the sun in di-rect-character-form, making the voltage, charge & movement in the same di-rection alike what happens in between the plates of a capacitor. The aether pours down like a river that rushes past us while we stand on grating with a pressure like riding the surface & when we step off of grating start at zero-speed and the river forever gives us it's velocity on the surface based on how long we ride and get sped up. But I think there is more-things that the aether can form into than those forms and if those are happening near us, they might be a part of what makes something move, which seems to be their point. Do you think that the einstein equation shows everything? Do you think the einstein equation is correct in the concept of curved-space when length is defined as the di-stance between two-points? I think they might be lining up their coordinates with some alternate-lines of force rather than the kind that we view with metal-filings over a magnet. I never thought his equation had all the things though. But do you think their way of thinking can show how magnets, charges, temperatures and masses work? I don't think that the General-Theory of Relativity was made for Power-Lines. For Power Lines I needed to find Charles P. Steinmetz's-Work.]
what
@@buttersquids [What type of question is that? One time I was sitting in high-school-chemistry and this kid walked into the class and said "where is the mr. teacher?"" type-stuff and then we didn't say anything and looked over at the teacher getting something out of his desk and then he just said "okay" with a big-o and walked away. It was so funny.]
@@buttersquids [Do you know the joke? Can you tell me so I can know if this is funny? Who said stuff like this? Did you want to have a conversation with me? I guess you can at my website. But my questions were for the maker of this video technicalli, although questions from other-viewers are also welcome with me.]
@@buttersquids [I think I found the Joke if it is the Lex Fridman AI Podcast. I will listen to it, and I will get back with my say on whether I think this is funny, which I just chose to speak about.]
@@buttersquids [I can't figure out how it's suppose to be funny. I saw a couple minutes of the Lex Fridman and they were talking about quantum which einstein people keep saying doesn't mix. I saw a artificial einstein video but that was just talking about computers doing general relativity all on their own, I think.]
😂